Cong Minh blog: Youtube daily is it Jan 31 2018

For more infomation >> Fear is not real. It's a choice. - Duration: 25:02.

-------------------------------------------

When Is The Best Time Of Day To Take CBD Oil - Duration: 3:46.

Well hello everyone it's Mike here, I just want to welcome you back to Green Akers Place and today

I want to ask you a question, a question

that's been asked by me, or of me several times.

And that's it's when is the best time to take CBD oil? And, it's a legitimate question

I mean everybody wants to know when is the

optimal time to take your CBD Oil for the best results? And

you know I've asked that question, many people ask me that question, so I decided to make this video,

to try to give you my opinion of when is the best time to take CBD Oil? Now

you know you may think well is it in the morning? Is that the best time to take CBD Oil?

Is the best time to take CBD oil before breakfast on an empty stomach?

Or, is the best time to take CBD Oil of the night, before you go to bed? And

in my opinion all of those questions are the right answer every one of those questions

are right. You know the best time to take CB deal in my opinion

Is any time you can get it in your body. The best time to take it for me,

and what I do every morning,

or every day is, when I get up of a morning the first thing I do is going and start up start a pot

of coffee because I'm a coffee drinker. I love coffee. And

this is my coffee starting to brew then I take my drops. I put my drops under my tongue.

That's the best way to ingest your CBD Oil, in my opinion, is sublingual under the tongue and let it absorb

Into your bloodstream that way. And what as my coffee's brewin,

I'll let that set and just absorb into my body.

And then I'm good to go for the rest of the day. And when I come home of a evening,

you know sometimes I take it immediately just as soon as I come in around 3:30 4:00 4:30 5 o'clock, whatever.

But, sometimes I wait till 7 or 8 o'clock at night before I go to bed. And

any time is great. I mean it doesn't matter, for some I know

it may you know you may get a little more tired of evening and you want to get ready and go to bed because I'm

going to tell you, once you go to sleep, you will sleep well.

That's one thing that has been such an

amazement to me and and has impressed me more than anything is the amount of sleep I get.

Not just the amount of sleep, but the quality of sleep. That's the thing, I sleep very well every night.

I wake up the next morning fully rested. I go throughout the day with plenty of energy.

I'm not feeling fatigued and lethargic like

I was. So in my opinion, the best time to take cbd oil is twice a day.

Early in the morning, and late of evening

And I know some people take it two or three times a day. They may take it during lunch time or whatever.

But any time is a good time to get this nutritional supplement into your system, because this is not a medicine.

This is actually a plant-based, or phytonutrient

that our body needs. So as soon as you can get it in and get it going in your system the better.

And so I hope this has helped you out a lot

you know it's a great question. And

you know, hey listen, if you're interested in buying this product,

I'm gonna leave a link down in the description box. You can click on my link and

you can purchase this product and get started taking it to to help you feel rested to help you get energy and

take some of the pain and inflammation away from your body. Also

we have a great opportunity for a business, if you if you're interested in joining this business

and and

I'll leave a link in the description box for that as well. So, we appreciate you guys taking the time to watch this video. And

we look forward to talking to you again soon. Y'all have a great day!

For more infomation >> When Is The Best Time Of Day To Take CBD Oil - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

Restaurant Says Starbucks' Exclusive Sales Clause Is Causing It To Lose Business - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> Restaurant Says Starbucks' Exclusive Sales Clause Is Causing It To Lose Business - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Does It Matter That Science Can't Detect God? - Duration: 2:37.

Atheists often justify their atheism by saying there's no evidence for God.

But when pressed about what type of evidence they're looking for, it often turns out

they're only looking for scientific evidence.

But this quest for truth starts off on the wrong foot.

Science is an empirically based discipline, and as such is ordered to physical reality

within our physical universe.

But if science's detecting powers are restricted to physical reality, and God by definition

is a non-physical being, then how could science in principle detect God?

The answer is, "It can't!"

Science can no more detect God than a metal detector can detect plastic cups.

And to not believe in God because there is no scientific evidence for him is as unreasonable

as refusing to believe there are plastic cups on the beach because a metal detector provided

no evidence for them.

The metal detector's inability to detect plastic cups says nothing about whether or

not plastic cups exist on the beach.

It's simply a manifestation of the limitations of the detecting powers of the instrument.

Similarly, science's inability to detect God says nothing about whether or not God

exists; it's simply a manifestation of the limitations of the detecting powers of science—it

can be used to detect only that which is empirically verifiable and quantifiably measurable.

To say that God doesn't exist because science can't detect him is to confuse the method

for knowing reality with reality itself.

In order to know the things that science can't, such as God, we must use other methods, such

as philosophy.

So, it really doesn't matter that science can't detect God, and therefore it's not

a justifiable reason to be an atheist.

If you want to learn more about this topic and others like it, visit our website at catholic.com.

For Catholic Answers, I'm Karlo Broussard.

Thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> Does It Matter That Science Can't Detect God? - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

IT'S 6 O'CLOCK | Telling the Time in Romanian #11 - Duration: 2:43.

IT'S 6 O'CLOCK

Cât e ceasul?

What time is it?

Hi. This is Mihnea.

Welcome to Romanian Hub, the Ultimate Romanian Language Learning Portal.

Welcome to another episode in the Telling the Time in Romanian series.

This episode will be focused on all possible ways of telling the time of the day.

Hai să începem.

Let's start.

Este ora 6.

It's 6 o'clock.

Este ora 6 fix.

It's 6 o'clock sharp.

Este 6 și 10 minute.

It's 10 minutes past 6.

Este 6 și un sfert.

It's quarter past 6.

Este 6 și jumătate.

It's half past 6.

Este 6 fără un sfert.

It's quarter to 6.

Este 6 fără 10.

It's 10 to 6.

Este 6 dimineața.

It's 6 in the morning.

Este 6 seara.

It's 6 in the evening.

And that's the end of this episode of Telling the Time in Romanian.

Cât e ceasul?

What time is it?

Why don't you tell me in the comments section below what time is it in your city right now?

And, don't forget to SUBSCRIBE.

In that way you won't miss the next episode.

Ceau.

This is Mihnea, signing out from Bangkok.

For more infomation >> IT'S 6 O'CLOCK | Telling the Time in Romanian #11 - Duration: 2:43.

-------------------------------------------

How far is it from Gibsons to Sechelt? - Duration: 1:00.

As the two largest centres on the Sunshine Coast, it's not unusual for residents to regularly

travel back and forth between Gibsons and Sechelt.

But just how far is that trip?

Google Maps says it's a 23-kilometer drive between the two towns.

In normal conditions on a good day, you should be able to make the drive in less than

half-an-hour.

If you hop on the bus, the trip should take you about 45 minutes.

If you're healthy and fit, riding your bicycle from Gibsons to Sechelt will require an hour-and-15-minutes

of your time.

If the weather's calm and you're really ambitious AND you want to make the trip in a way that most

people never see, you can canoe or kayak that distance in five to seven hours.

But make sure if you do that. you're prepared and that you're going with an experienced paddler.

Whichever mode of transportation you plan on taking, make sure you give yourself a little

extra time.

Weather and the ferry schedule can have a big impact on traffic all along the Sunshine Coast.

For more infomation >> How far is it from Gibsons to Sechelt? - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

🎲FunFair co-founder Jez San explains what is Funfair and how it's helping online casinos🎲 - Duration: 2:31.

I'm Jezz San I'm one of the founders of FunFair which is a gaming technology

company based in London. FunFair has created technology that empowers casino

operators to offer a fair game so it's powered by the blockchain and smart

contracts and it's the first time that we've been able to build a casino gaming

system, a platform that literally runs on the blockchain and doesn't require any

servers one of the problems we're solving is the trust problem that many

players don't want to trust leaving money in a casino or believe that

they're going to be cheated and even though the cases of people actually

being cheated is very low because there is a trust issue the market is limited

in its size by the number of people willing to participate in it so we

believe by creating technology that guarantees a fair game and also does it

very efficiently so that casino operators have good margins we believe

that we can have an expanded market we believe we can offer the player benefits,

the operator benefits, even the regulators and affiliates get

something out of it. And how does your technology do that? So it does that

firstly we've built the games to run in smart contracts on the blockchain and

then we've also built a scaling technology that we call fate channels

and that allows transactions to run really fast which allows players to play

games at the speed that is fun because right now the blockchain is quite slow

and can be overloaded at times and that wouldn't be a fun experience for players

if if the games they played were slowed down by the blockchain so we have

technology that takes the games off chain lets them run really fast and then

goes back to the chain to do settlement. So what is your transaction rate? We can

do thousands of transactions a second and it could scale much faster than that

and it does that by opening the transaction on the blockchain and

putting bringing deposits onto the blockchain and then it can play as many

games as it wants off chain and then it goes back to the blockchain to settle so

there's really no limit to the number of transactions per second and this is all

running on today's Ethereum we're not waiting for a future version it runs

today on on our website FunFair.io

For more infomation >> 🎲FunFair co-founder Jez San explains what is Funfair and how it's helping online casinos🎲 - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

DavorCoin is Sinking - Can They Turn It Around? - Duration: 37:01.

DavorCoin is Sinking - Can They Turn It Around?

For more infomation >> DavorCoin is Sinking - Can They Turn It Around? - Duration: 37:01.

-------------------------------------------

Cat is unhappy to see it's owner - Duration: 0:07.

Good Morning, damsel

For more infomation >> Cat is unhappy to see it's owner - Duration: 0:07.

-------------------------------------------

Afterlife: Is there one? | A Mortal Minute - Duration: 1:21.

What is the afterlife? Is it a place? A state of being? Chemical processes in the

brain that are meant to comfort us as we slide into oblivion? Or is it something

else entirely? If it's a place, where is it? Are we like fish swimming in the

water, completely unaware of an entire world above the surface surviving in a

way that we could not? If it's a state of being, does that mean that after we die

we exist completely outside time and space? And if it is a chemical process

that is meant to gently send us off to nothingness. is that a product of

evolution, and if so what is its advantage? What do you think? Please let

us know in the comments below and don't forget to like and subscribe for more

videos like this. This has been your Mortal Minute.

For more infomation >> Afterlife: Is there one? | A Mortal Minute - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

IT 2017 is Not a Remake | IT - Duration: 3:05.

I notice a lot of people are calling a new it movie a remake hmm. I just want to explain why it's not a remake

I get it we live in a remake era

everything's being remade, reboot, remake and we so badly want to add IT into the good remake section

However, that's wrong because 2017 IT is not a remake. It's the first movie version and I'll explain why

The 2017 is the movie adaption of IT while 1990 is the TV adaption. Yes, both are telling the same story

but there is a huge difference in a movie adaption versus a TV adaption

A movie adaption has a whole movie studio behind it in this case Warner Brothers.

a way bigger budget which allows you to do more stuff of casting and production.

A huge factor. A TV adaption is under TV network, which is ABC.

a smaller budget but also heavy restrictions on censorship, and this is a horror movie about a clown who eats kids

Stephen King's it is not the ideal movie for TV

So you're never gonna get the full treatment that it deserves on a TV format. It's not even HBO. This is ABC primetime in 1990

By the way, I love the 1990 version

for a TV movie it was great, but even back then

I wish IT had gotten released into movie theaters over TV

Cuz the movie director Tommy Lee Wallace and the makeup crew could have done a lot more to the movie

Tommy Lee Wallace said after paying off all the actors and the crew they barely had any money left over for the movie.

A lot of the stuff on the original script

ABC cut out to make a TV friendly. Just want to give examples the difference between a TV versus movie

In a recent interview Bart Mixon the makeup artists from the 1990 TV movie

even mentioned the advantage of movie version has over a TV version

Movie wise you have more of a running time to tell a story

Which I'd even think about and they had to deal with TV censorship, which I already mentioned

If you're gonna call it a remake then you're gonna have to call Tim Burton Sleepy Hollow

Alice in Wonderland in all of the chronical Narnia movies a remake

cuz all of them had TV adaption movies or mini series that took place way before the movie adaptions came out

But we don't call them remakes cuz they're not remakes. I'm sure there's more examples, but that's at least three

I could think of right away, and yet I noticed nobody calls them remakes

That is why IT is not a remake

This is the first movie adaption of IT

And it's definitely not made for TV.

The 1990 version was made for TV. You guys got to remember that

and that's why IT 2017 is not classified as a remake, and it shouldn't be called a remake

For more infomation >> IT 2017 is Not a Remake | IT - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

Does It Matter That Science Can't Detect God? - Duration: 2:37.

Atheists often justify their atheism by saying there's no evidence for God.

But when pressed about what type of evidence they're looking for, it often turns out

they're only looking for scientific evidence.

But this quest for truth starts off on the wrong foot.

Science is an empirically based discipline, and as such is ordered to physical reality

within our physical universe.

But if science's detecting powers are restricted to physical reality, and God by definition

is a non-physical being, then how could science in principle detect God?

The answer is, "It can't!"

Science can no more detect God than a metal detector can detect plastic cups.

And to not believe in God because there is no scientific evidence for him is as unreasonable

as refusing to believe there are plastic cups on the beach because a metal detector provided

no evidence for them.

The metal detector's inability to detect plastic cups says nothing about whether or

not plastic cups exist on the beach.

It's simply a manifestation of the limitations of the detecting powers of the instrument.

Similarly, science's inability to detect God says nothing about whether or not God

exists; it's simply a manifestation of the limitations of the detecting powers of science—it

can be used to detect only that which is empirically verifiable and quantifiably measurable.

To say that God doesn't exist because science can't detect him is to confuse the method

for knowing reality with reality itself.

In order to know the things that science can't, such as God, we must use other methods, such

as philosophy.

So, it really doesn't matter that science can't detect God, and therefore it's not

a justifiable reason to be an atheist.

If you want to learn more about this topic and others like it, visit our website at catholic.com.

For Catholic Answers, I'm Karlo Broussard.

Thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> Does It Matter That Science Can't Detect God? - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Disgusting Michael Moore Is Back With NASTY Demand For White Males – Forgets He's One - Duration: 4:51.

For more infomation >> Disgusting Michael Moore Is Back With NASTY Demand For White Males – Forgets He's One - Duration: 4:51.

-------------------------------------------

What is a Spectrum Analyzer and Measurements You Can Make - What the RF - Duration: 4:30.

Why hello there. In this video, we'll be discussing what a spectrum analyzer is

and the different measurements you can make on it. My name is

What's up everyone.

The name is Nick Ben and I'm an engineer here at Keysight and welcome to this

episode of What the RF. In this episode we'll be discussing what a spectrum or

signal analyzer is. "What is a spectrum analyzer?" you may ask. This right here, is

a spectrum analyzer. A spectrum analyzer basically analyzes spectra.

Alright, fine fine fine. There's more to a spectrum analyzer than

I actually let on. If you've ever used an oscilloscope like the one that you see

right here, then you know that it displays received signals with respect to

amplitude versus time. Now on the other hand a spectrum analyzer displays

received signals with respect to amplitude versus frequency. Now in terms

of a simple analogy for this very complicated electromagnetic topic, I

guess you could say it's pretty much like comparing the same data between a

pie chart and a bar graph.

Here, we see that Daniel has eaten eight pies, Nick

has eaten two pies, and Ally has eaten one pie. And also here we see that Daniel has

eaten majority of the pies. This can only mean that Daniel really likes pies.

For those of you that don't know, the term spectrum analyzer and signal

analyzer are used almost interchangeably, but there are some slight differences.

Spectrum analyzers display a signal's amplitude as it varies by frequency but

by definition a spectrum analyzer does not measure the phase of your signal. Now

without this phase information of your signal, we wouldn't be able to measure

for example digital communications like LTE on your cell phone. On the contrary a

signal analyzer like this one measures the amplitude and phase of a signal at a

single frequency. If you transmit an RF signal from your device, a signal

analyzer can down convert the signal into a digital signal and the signal

analyzer can display the signal in terms of constellations, spectrum, power versus

time, etc. Basically a signal analyzer can measure both amplitude and frequency and

phase of your signal of interest which you can't do on a spectrum analyzer. Now

let's learn what kind of measurements we can make on our all-knowing signal

analyzer. he main use of a signal analyzer is to measure the power of a

signals of various frequency components like radio frequency and audio signals.

A signal analyzer allows you to analyze your device's signal and circuit

performance in a way that isn't possible using other means. Say looking at it in

the time domain. Spectrum and signal analyzers can make a large variety of

measurements ranging from harmonic distortion test for transmitters, WLAN

analysis, and spectral masks for showing limits of unwanted emissions, to two tone

tests on an RF power amplifier. Because of how powerful a tool a signal analyzer

is, it is practically owned across all engineering labs for design development

and testing of engineer's devices. If you need to see the frequency makeup of your

signals, a signal analyzer is a great tool to have. Also if you'd like to dig

deeper into spectrum analysis, check out the application note in the description

below, but more importantly don't forget to subscribe and check out the

other videos on our channel. Alright that's it for this episode. Thanks so

much

What the RF? Who keeps turning off these lights?

Hello? Hello? What the RF?

For more infomation >> What is a Spectrum Analyzer and Measurements You Can Make - What the RF - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

2 Investigators: It's Doomsday If GPS Is Disabled - Duration: 2:39.

For more infomation >> 2 Investigators: It's Doomsday If GPS Is Disabled - Duration: 2:39.

-------------------------------------------

Officer in Arms Alastair Bruce says it is unli Forget Meghan what will HARRY wear to the wedding? - Duration: 5:02.

Officer in Arms Alastair Bruce says it is unlikely Harry will wear military uniform

Predicts as he is no longer a serving member of Army he may wear morning suit

Bruce says that Harry still has the option of wearing uniform on his big day

Since the announcement of Prince Harry's engagement to Meghan Markle speculation has mounted over what we can expect the bride to wear on her big day.

However, Meghan isn't the only one who will need to make a good impression, with her dashing fiance also expected to dress the part for what is sure to be one of the most watched weddings of all time.

But while a version of the classic white wedding dress is almost certainly a given for Meghan, what her prince will wear is less clear.

According to one former Army officer and respected royal commentator, Prince Harry might not follow in the footsteps of his older brother, who wore full military attire to marry Kate Middleton in 2012

In fact Alastair Bruce suggested that the happy couple's chosen location, St George's Chapel at Windsor Castle, makes it more likely Harry will choose a traditional morning suit

William wore the uniform of the Colonel, Irish Guards at his wedding, because he had recently been appointed to this role by The Queen and his wedding was a ceremonial one.

However, according to former army officer Bruce, a ceremonial expert who is a royal commentator for Sky News, we are unlikely to see Harry in uniform when he and Meghan exchange vows next spring

Speaking to Cosmopolitan, Bruce said: 'As Prince Harry is no longer a serving officer in the Armed Forces, it is unlikely he will wear a uniform

'If they choose to marry in St George's Chapel [which the couple have confirmed they will do in May], as the Earl of Wessex did, I would expect he would choose morning dress.'

However, Bruce says that if he wanted to the prince would have the option of wearing a uniform and would be most likely to choose the 'Captain in the Blues and Royals part of the Household Cavalry Regiment, which was his uniform while serving'.

MailOnline have contacted Kensington Palace for a comment

Meanwhile Meghan, 36, is expected to wear a 'classic and simple' gown after previously hinting at what her dream wedding dress would look like

Before she was to be Prince Harry's girlfriend, the actress, 36, described in an interview how her ideal gown as something that is 'classic and simple', calling Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy's wedding dress her 'everything goals'.

Meanwhile, she also said the fairytale gown worn by her Suits character Rachel Zane was 'not my personal style', saying that she'd prefer something more 'relaxed'.

This suggests that Meghan's wedding dress is likely to be rather different to the Duchess of Cambridge's traditional gown by Alexander McQueen, which she wore to walk down the aisle in 2011.

Speaking in an interview with Glamour about her dream dress, Meghan said: 'Classic and simple is the name of the game, perhaps with a modern twist.

'I personally prefer wedding dresses that are whimsical or subtly romantic.'

Explaining how she wouldn't choose a gown like the Anne Barge dress worn by her character in season 5, she added: 'It's not my personal style, because I'm a lot more relaxed than Rachel but I love that I got to play dress up in this gown.'

Meghan also cited her the minimalist white gown worn by Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy on her wedding day in 1996 as her all-time favourite celebrity wedding dress.

The classic dress worn by John F Kennedy Jr's bride was designed by American designer Narciso Rodriguez, who was little known at the time, suggesting he could potentially be in the running to design Meghan's own gown.

The actress also listed some of her favourite wedding dress labels, including French designer Delphine Manivet and Greek-based designer Christos Costarellos.

She declared herself a fan of both Elie Saab and J

Mendel, who may also be in the

For more infomation >> Officer in Arms Alastair Bruce says it is unli Forget Meghan what will HARRY wear to the wedding? - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

Dairy Allergy: What It Is And How To Know If You Have It - Duration: 6:04.

Dairy Allergy: What It Is And How To Know If You Have It

A dairy allergy is an overreaction of the immune system to milk proteins whey and/or casein.

Symptoms can range from mild (such as hives, swelling, itching, rashes) to a severe and potentially fatal allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis.

Diagnosis by a qualified allergist by means of a skin or blood test is often the most effective way of confirming a dairy allergy.

Although milk is widely considered an excellent source of dietary calcium and protein, it is also one of the most common allergens in the world, particularly among children.

According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, about 2.5% of children aged three or younger are allergic to dairy products.

The good news is about 80% of children will likely outgrow their dairy allergy by the age of 16.

Understanding Your Allergy.

Dairy Allergy Versus Milk Allergy.

Dairy allergy is the blanket term used for an allergy to milk and all milk-based products.

Specifically, a dairy allergy is an allergy to the milk proteins casein (comprising about 80% of the protein in milk ) and whey (about 20%).2 Having an actual allergy to milk usually means having to avoid all dairy products including butter, cheese, yogurt, ice cream, sour cream, ghee, whey, milk chocolate, cream cheese and so on.

Dairy Allergy Versus Lactose Intolerance.

Many people think that dairy allergy is the same as lactose intolerance.

But contrary to popular belief, the two are completely unrelated!4 Individuals who have a dairy allergy experience allergic symptoms to milk because their immune system recognizes casein and/or whey as harmful substances.

In turn, this causes the immune system to overreact and triggers hives, vomiting, itching, and even anaphylactic shock in extreme cases, which can be life-threatening.

Yeah, it's not fun.

In comparison, people who are lactose intolerant are unable to digest the sugar component in milk – lactose – due to low levels of an enzyme called lactase.

Consuming milk or derivative products when you're lactose intolerant can lead to symptoms such as diarrhea, gas, or abdominal cramps, but this condition is not life-threatening.

Sure, you'll be uncomfortable, but you'll live!.

People with a dairy allergy will be intolerant and/or allergic to milk and all milk-based products.

However, those who are lactose intolerant can be sensitive to some milk products but not others, depending on how the milk fat is processed in specific derivative products.5 For example, someone who is lactose intolerant may be able to digest yogurt easily but could experience discomfort with cheese or butter.

The specific reaction depends on how the casein and whey in each product were broken down and processed during production.

What's Causing Your Dairy Allergy?.

Like all other food allergies, an allergy to milk and dairy products is caused by a malfunction in the good old immune system.

When a person allergic to dairy consumes milk or milk products, their immune system recognizes casein and/or whey as dangerous intruders and produces antibodies called immunoglobulin E (IgE).

The next time the person consumes milk or other dairy products, the IgE rushes to neutralize the threat (milk proteins) by triggering the immune system to release chemicals called histamines which can cause a variety of allergic reactions.

For more infomation >> Dairy Allergy: What It Is And How To Know If You Have It - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

Disgusting Michael Moore Is Back With NASTY Demand For White Males – Forgets He's One - Duration: 4:53.

For more infomation >> Disgusting Michael Moore Is Back With NASTY Demand For White Males – Forgets He's One - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

Officer in Arms Alastair Bruce says it is unli Forget Meghan what will HARRY wear to the wedding? - Duration: 5:02.