Thứ Hai, 24 tháng 4, 2017

Youtube daily or Apr 24 2017

Ankerberg: Richard Dawkins and other evolutionary biologists are still confidently proclaiming

that it's possible to build a Cambrian animal by natural selection and random mutation in

small incremental steps.

But what are some of the problems that you see with this evolutionary view?

Dr. Stephen Meyer: Well, actually many of the leading Cambrian paleontologists are now

disputing that view.

There's a paleontologist at the Smithsonian named Douglas Erwin who has written a book

with James Valentine from the University of California Berkeley.

And they take what they call a non-uniformitarian evolutionary view, which just in plain English

means that whatever caused the Cambrian animals to emerge, it's unlike anything, any biological

process we see at work today, including the mutation natural selection process.

So, there's a lot of scientists who are doubting the creative power of the mutation

selection mechanisms.

One of the reasons for that is that natural selection can only select for a functional

advantage, for an advantageous change in a protein or a gene at the smallest level.

And yet, we know that the odds of generating such a new gene or protein by random mutations

alone is extremely small.

And it's small even when we take into account the number of opportunities there are for

such an event to occur, given the known history of life on earth.

So, the idea that mutation and selection have this amazing creative power is really increasingly

being questioned.

It does a great job of explaining small minor variations in existing protein folds and structures,

but if you need enough changes to build what's called a new protein structure, a new protein

fold, too many things have to go right before there's any selectable advantage.

There is no gradual series of steps up the backside of the mountain.

It's basically a big-jump proposition where you need many coordinated changes to occur

before there's any selectable advantage.

And the number of coordinated changes that are required are so vastly improbable that

it's far more likely, as we were saying in the last program, that such a random search

will fail, than it is that such a mechanism will succeed.

So the really important, I would say, mathematical reasons to doubt the creative power of the

mutation selection mechanism with respect to the problem of building even one gene or

protein, let alone a whole new Cambrian animal which would require hundreds and thousands

of new genes and proteins.

For more infomation >> Could the Cambrian animals have come into existence as a result of natural selection or mutation? - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

Part 12 | How to Setup Custom Domain (Free or Paid) | Blogger Course in Urdu/Hindi - Duration: 10:51.

Part 12 | How to Setup Custom Domain (Free or Paid) | Blogger Course in Urdu/Hindi

For more infomation >> Part 12 | How to Setup Custom Domain (Free or Paid) | Blogger Course in Urdu/Hindi - Duration: 10:51.

-------------------------------------------

Gameplay clip "OR YM" # 1 - Duration: 1:45.

[Scholar 2017]

[Clip gameplay "OR YM" # 1]

[I will go to information there]

[It is a child of the Earth who came from OR YM few years ago and what about spherical energies?]

[That is, I thought they were other things and 2 children there, which sera OTL?]

[I like those numbers]

[To play!]

[He looks like one of the spheres before the child got a game]

[Six levels, I will not reach time]

[A thorn]

[Me is damaging]

[Space switch]

[Slime-On, What is that? ]

[There will be the orange objects]

[This gave me more than others]

[If I do not move might fall]

[I spent the first zone, let him follow!]

[It will be more difficult next]

[Soon more gameplays]

For more infomation >> Gameplay clip "OR YM" # 1 - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

LPGA V or X - Duration: 0:31.

When it comes to total performance,

there's a choice.

The V or the X.

V.

I play the X.

I love the X.

Stops on a dime.

I choose the X.

The distance is insane.

For tour players and amateurs,

the choice is clear.

X, all day.

The X!

V.

The X.

The V. I love the consistent flight.

Absolutely the V.

I play the X...

... and so will he.

The choice is better than ever.

The New Pro V1 or Pro V1x.

For more infomation >> LPGA V or X - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

Outline of The Recurring Meetings in an Agency (Too Much or Necessary?) - Duration: 4:13.

One of people's main complaints

about the agency business is that there are a lot

of meetings, sometimes unnecessarily so.

Way too many meetings on the calendar.

In this video I'm gonna run through the recurring meetings

that are on my calendar

and show you what we do in each one of 'em,

and hopefully you can use those

to improve the functions of your agency.

So here is my calendar for June 25th.

This is a little bit out in the future,

so all of my regular meetings are gone.

These are just the recurring meetings.

And here's what I got.

Monday I have blocked out to make videos,

so I have this standing meeting here.

This 11:30 is a client update call.

I'm trying to pull myself off of 'em.

We just hired a new account manager,

and he and the director of production, my co-founder Robert,

should be taking those calls.

Ideally by the time we get to June 25th, he will be

and I won't be needed on that meeting any more.

But that is a weekly call

that we are gonna have with all of our accounts

where the account manager tells the client what's going on

and gets intense feedback.

The next meeting that's recurring,

Monday's like a full recurring day,

is the x27 Mastermind.

That's where I meet with my co-founder

and we run through all the accounts

and we basically touch base on how the company is doing

from a strategic level.

And I'll actually go through what we talk about

in that Mastermind video in about a week,

so stay tuned for next Monday's video for that.

So after that I have a one on one with Liban.

He's one of our cold callers.

A one on one.

I got it from this podcast called Manager Tools,

which we'll link that one on one episode

down in the description.

But what it is is a 30 minute meeting

where the first 10 minutes are the employee,

the team member talking

about anything they wanna talk about.

Middle 10 is where we talk about anything I want

to talk about from them, updates, that sort of stuff.

And then the last 10 minutes we talk about the future,

where their career is going, that sort of thing.

And these one on ones have been

extremely helpful for morale.

The next thing on my calendar is a daily standup with Liban.

By the time we get to June 26th, these won't happen.

But what I incorporate is every time we come up

with a new process,

I add daily one on ones for the first two weeks

just to touch base and see how the process is going.

As you saw a few weeks ago,

we are testing out a new cold email process.

It is working amazingly well.

And we are about five days into the daily one on ones.

So we probably have another week of those

and then these won't be on the calendar anymore.

It's a five minute update call

where I basically say, "Hey, Liban, how's it going?"

I look at the Excel doc

that I went over a couple videos ago,

and that's basically it.

Five, six minute call, that's it.

And then the final recurring meeting on Mondays

is the weekly sales standup.

I either made a video on this

or I will make a video on this

about how to effectively run a sales standup,

so expect that one or it's gonna be in the description.

But this is where me, my co-founder Robert,

and our two sales co-founders Afnan and Cameron

discuss all the accounts and where we see the company going

in terms of sales in the next week.

And it's also to talk about how much work they're doing,

what sort of stuff they're working on.

The rest of the calendar are one on ones

with the different team members,

except for these two meetings.

One is a weekly product standup where the account manager

and the project manager go through every single account

in detail and talk about how we can improve the strategy.

Basically this is where the account manager,

where Lael takes his feedback from the client

and works with Istvan our project manager

and Robert to implement it.

These usually take about a half hour.

Santiago is on there as well, our marketing strategist

to help if there's any strategy questions.

And then the final recurring meeting

besides all the one on ones with the team

is the final X27 mastermind for the week.

So on Monday I meet with Robert to talk about

where the company's going for the week

and then on Friday we meet

and these are more chill meetings

where we're basically just catching up before the weekend.

Similar to how a one on one is structured

with a team member.

It's just me and my co-founder.

Those are my recurring meetings.

Leave a comment below and

judge me harshly.

Are there any unnecessary meetings you're seeing in here?

Are there any meetings you think should be added?

And for your agency, is there anything you would add

based on this doc to your company's process?

Also are there any of these meetings you want to see

in more detail in future videos?

Let me know.

If you like this video be sure to like it

to encourage this type of content on YouTube.

Subscribe for more B2B sales training

and if you need marketing support for your digital agency

check out experiment27.com, thanks.

For more infomation >> Outline of The Recurring Meetings in an Agency (Too Much or Necessary?) - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

10 Real People with Superpowers - Duration: 5:26.

Brainy Dose Presents:

10 Real People with Superpowers

Believe it or not, there are people walking among us who possess real-life superpowers.

These individuals, in most cases, are born with a rare genetic mutation, which allows

them to do things that should NOT be possible!

The following superhumans have some amazing abilities, and here are their superpowers:

Number One: The Brain Man

Daniel Tammet has Savant Syndrome, an extremely rare form of Asperger's that gives him almost

unimaginable mental powers.

He sees numbers as shapes, colours and textures, and can perform incredibly complicated math

equations all in his head.

Daniel remembers pi to over twenty-two-thousand digits.

He can also learn to speak a language fluently from scratch in just one week.

Number Two: The Human Anvil

Gino Martino is a professional wrestler and entertainer, with a superhuman skull.

Gino has had blocks of concrete broken over his head with a jackhammer.

He even had a bowling ball dropped on him from 15 feet high while holding a brick tile

on top of his head!

According to doctors, Gino's skull is 2.3 times thicker than the average human skull.

Number Three: The Iceman

Wim Hof has the power to withstand below freezing temperatures.

He achieves this remarkable feat through meditation by turning his "inner thermostat" up.

Wim ran marathons barefoot in snow, has been buried in ice, and holds the world record

for the longest time submerged in an ice bath.

Wim has also climbed the top of Mount Kilimanjaro, in a pair of shorts!

Number Four: The Living Camera

Stephen Wiltshire has the amazing ability to look at a subject just once, and create

a drawing of the subject in full detail and accuracy.

Stephen has drawn several panoramic pictures of world famous cities relying only on his

unique memory.

His largest single piece of work to date is a 10-meter-drawing of Tokyo which took him

8 days to complete.

Number Five: The Rubber Man

Jaspreet Singh Kalra is a young contortionist with an extremely flexible body.

He was inspired by Daniel Browning Smith - an American contortionist.

Jaspreet is capable of rotating his head 180° backwards and he can dislocate both of his

shoulders.

He can rotate his torso 180° backwards, and has an advanced front and back bending range.

Number Six: The Ultra-Marathon Man

Dean Karnazes is able to run at high speed all day long without getting worn out!

That's because he doesn't experience muscle cramps, even when his runs exceed 100 miles.

Dean's amazing feats include running on a treadmill for 80 hours non-stop, and running

50 marathons in 50 states in 50 consecutive days.

Scientists concluded that if Dean was kept hydrated and properly fed, he could run at

around 7-10 MPH for the rest of his life.

Number Seven: The Human Magnet

Muhibija Buljubašić claims to have a special ability that allows him to stick random objects

onto parts of his body.

Since he discovered his 'magnetic' abilities, Muhibija has been seen with a remarkable range

of objects stuck to his body.

Including multiple spoons, TV remotes, cellphones, glass objects and even an iron!

Now, some speculate that human magnetic abilities are nothing more than greasy skin.

Whether that's true or not, the ability to accumulate the amount of grease it would

require to hold an iron to one's chest would be remarkable in itself!

Number Eight: Zamora the Torture King

Tim Cridland is the man that feels no pain.

Tim has used this ability for shock entertainment by pushing needles and skewers through various

parts of his body.

Tim says he can do this because he has mastered mind over matter.

However, researchers say it's because Tim was born with a mutation, making him not feel

pain the way that the rest of us do.

Number Nine: The Lion Whisperer

Kevin Richardson is an animal behaviorist who has been accepted into several lion prides

and clans of hyenas.

He made a name for himself breaking practically every safety rule that was ever created in

regards to working with wild animals.

Instead, he takes the time and puts in the effort to learn about the animals' unique

behaviors and characteristics.

As a result, these wild animals end up accepting him as one of their own.

Number Ten: The Eye-Popper

Kim Goodman has the most shocking eye-popping ability on the planet.

She can pop out her eyes to an unbelievable 12 millimeters!

Kim discovered her amazing eye-popping ability when she was hit on the head by a hockey mask;

and ever since that day she could pop out her eyes on cue.

Do you have any special abilities?

If so, share them with us in the comment section!

Or, tell us what superpower you WISH you had!

Thanks for watching!

Please LIKE and SHARE this video!

And

SUBSCRIBE for more!

For more infomation >> 10 Real People with Superpowers - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

Pregnant or not.. - Duration: 3:31.

HEY guys welcomes to my chanel

sorry cant help but shake

so so nervous

sadly no line appeared

For more infomation >> Pregnant or not.. - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

how to install or get games and apps for free without any root in ipad/ipod/ios/and tablet in 2017 - Duration: 5:58.

For more infomation >> how to install or get games and apps for free without any root in ipad/ipod/ios/and tablet in 2017 - Duration: 5:58.

-------------------------------------------

Vertigo Gaze Stabilization Exercises - Ask Doctor Jo - Duration: 4:07.

Hey everybody it's Doctor Jo, and today

I'm going to show you some gaze

stabilization exercises for vertigo.

Let's get started.

Vertigo is a very

general term. It's usually diagnosed a lot.

You have vertigo, but vertigo is a

symptom, it's not really a diagnosis. You

can have positional vertigo, you can have

centralized vertigo, you can have

vestibular loss, so it's really just a

symptom of many things. So these gaze

stabilization exercises are really for

like a chronic dizziness type of vertigo.

Some people say that the positional

vertigo, this doesn't really help, but in

my opinion I think is worth doing when

you're doing your other exercises with

it as well. So just to know that when

someone says vertigo, it's not

necessarily a specific diagnosis, it's

just something a symptom that you have,

and it could be something else. So with

that said, for these exercises, it's just

like it sounds you are gazing upon

something and stabilizing your eyes. So

what you want to do is make a target. You

can put an X on a sticky note and put it

on a wall, or you can just use your

finger, but you want to keep your eyes on

the target, whatever you're looking at. So

when I do it, I'm going to do it at a

slight angle so you can see what I'm

doing, but when you're doing it at home,

you want it to be right in front of you.

So you don't want your body or your head

to be an angle, you want to be straight

in front of you, but I feel like if I do

it I'm going to be looking at the camera

instead of my fingers, so I'm going to do

it at a slight angle. Also be aware that

while you're doing these it might

reproduce some of those dizzy symptoms,

you might start feeling a little sick or

nauseated, getting that spinny feeling, so

make sure you're in a safe environment

when you do it, and make sure that you

don't have to go anywhere right after

you do these, and then eventually it will

get better. So I'm going to just use my

finger to look at and keep my gaze on my

finger, and then just move my head side

to side, while I'm looking at my finger.

So I'm trying to keep my eyes there the

whole time, which sounds pretty easy but

if you have chronic dizziness, sometimes

this is pretty hard to do, so just start

off with

10 to 15 seconds of this. Eventually you

can work your way up to 30 seconds or a

minute, but in the beginning you don't

want to do a whole lot because it might

reproduce some symptoms of dizziness. So

after you go side to side, then you're

going to go up and down, but same thing

try and keep your eyes on the target the

whole time, which again is sometimes

harder than it sounds. So just looking up

and down, keeping those eyes on the

finger, and moving the head. So then after

you do that, then you're going to go at

an angle, so I'm just going to bring my

head one way, and then down. So again

trying to keep my eyes on my finger the

whole time. It might look kind of funny

because I'm focusing very hard on that

finger, but keeping that gaze in one spot,

and then doing the other angle. So going

up and down, so really just trying to

retrain your vision, and so you don't

have that dizziness. So it's it's an

exercise, you're exercising those eyes,

trying to get that stabilization back. So

it's as simple as that, and so it's just

retraining your eyes because a lot of

times with that dizziness, you have what

we call up nystagmus. Which is that

shifting of the eyes, and a lot of times

if you're getting tested by your doctor,

your physical therapist, that's what they

look for. They bring your head down and

they look to see if your eyes are

bouncing back and forth, and so this is

just a great way to help strengthen that

so you don't have that dizziness or

spinning feeling all the time. So if you

have any questions, leave them in the

comments section. If you'd like to help

support our channel so we can make more

awesome videos, click the box up here. And

remember, be safe have fun, and I hope you

feel better soon.

For more infomation >> Vertigo Gaze Stabilization Exercises - Ask Doctor Jo - Duration: 4:07.

-------------------------------------------

Yo Yo dieting - Duration: 1:41.

Hi guys.

Welcome to our channel Health-Hatch.

So today I am gonna talk about Yo-Yo dieting or Crash diet.

Generally whenever we have to attend parties or family function or wedding ceremonies.

Looking slim, pretty is like must for us.

So you know we go in for a 10-day or a 15-day weight loss program wherein we go for a salad

diet or fruit or a fruit juice diet or skipping one of the major meals like breakfast, lunch

or dinner.

Now such kind of crash diets does lead to weight loss, So it is basically the muscle

loss & not fat loss right.

And the other thing is once you return to your routine program, your routine schedule

you tend to gain double the weight that you have lost right . The other thing is such

kind of diet reduces your body's immunity making you prone to infections like cold,cough,fever

etc.

It also reduces your body's haemoglobin levels making you know feel tired very soon.

Also it leads to hair loss.

So please stop following such kind of crash diets and go for a healthy harmless weight

loss rather inch loss or a fat loss diet program.

Right?

Which reduces your chances of getting diabetes or PCOD or heart disease in future.

If you find this video useful Like, Share and Subscribe to our You-Tube Channel.

For more infomation >> Yo Yo dieting - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

How to Kill Anxiety Once and For All - Duration: 1:49.

hi

For more infomation >> How to Kill Anxiety Once and For All - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

What's My Personality: Thinking or Feeling? - Duration: 5:12.

Welcome to Willow Tree Training's Type Transformations, a video series to help you learn more about

yourself and transform your world.

In this video, we will explore one of the dichotomies of personality type theory.

What do we mean by that?

Well, the definition of a dichotomy is a difference between two completely opposite ideas or things.

Your personality type is made up of four preferences, chosen from the four dichotomies of extraversion

or introversion, sensing or intuition, thinking or feeling, and judging or perceiving.

You have a natural, in-born preference for one or the other options of the four dichotomies.

So let's explore these preferences, and while you're watching, see if you can figure out

which one fits you best.

Ready?

Let's go!

We all know what it means to think and to feel.

But thinking and feeling have different meanings when we talk about personality type preferences.

According to type theory, thinking and feeling are actually two different decision-making

modes.

So, thinkers tend to step out of situations to make their decisions, looking at issues

based on an objective standard of truth.

While feelers prefer to step into situations and make decisions more subjectively by putting

themselves into other people's shoes.

Thinkers typically use data, logic, and cause-and-effect analysis to come to the one best answer.

Feelers use their personal values, empathy, and compassion when they are deciding what

to do.

Both types want to be fair in their decision making, but they have different definitions

of fairness.

Thinkers believe fairness means holding everyone to the same standard and applying rules equally,

based on whatever principle or law that applies.

Feelers believe that fairness means considering each person's particular situation and allowing

for exceptions to the rule based on any potential negative impact or to meet that person's individual

needs.

Thinkers value competence and tend to critique in order to find flaws that can be corrected,

so they can sometimes appear to feelers to be rather blunt or critical at times.

Feelers value personal relationships and tend to overlook flaws, preferring to show appreciation

and praise, so they can appear to thinkers to ignore problems or give people too many

chances.

It's important to remember that thinkers feel and feelers think.

When you're making a big decision, you most likely will look at both the objective and

subjective aspects of the situation.

But which do you tend to use first?

Which is more important to you?

Do you start with the logical analysis and then think about how your decision might affect

others?

Or do you immediately consider the impact on people and relationships and then start

scrutinizing the objective facts?

One more thing to consider when making your decision is the cultural bias for men to be

thinkers and women to be feelers.

But research has shown that men and women have an almost equal chance of being a thinker

or feeler.

So if you're torn between choosing thinking or feeling, it may be that you're being pulled

toward one because of social expectations, but your natural preference is actually for

the other.

So do you feel that you are a thinker?

Thinkers are logical and analytical.

They use objective principles to make their decisions.

They are reasonable and fair because they treat everyone the same.

And they look for what is true and what is false in a situation.

Or do you think that you're a feeler?

Feelers are kind and empathetic.

They use subjective inner values to decide the best course.

They are understanding and fair because they treat everyone as an individual.

And they look for what is good and what is bad in a situation.

So whether you are a thinker or a feeler, you have unique strengths and blind spots.

One is not better than the other.

They are both rational ways of making decisions.

Be sure to watch more of our videos to discover your other three preferences.

These other preferences are extraversion or introversion, sensing or intuition, and judging

or perceiving.

And remember, the best way to discover your personality type is to take the Myers-Briggs

Type Indicator with a certified practitioner to go over your results.

Visit our web site at www.willowtreetraining.com for more information about having one of our

certified MBTI practitioners assess your personality type.

Until next time, keep leading, learning, and transforming.

For more infomation >> What's My Personality: Thinking or Feeling? - Duration: 5:12.

-------------------------------------------

Nicole's Vlogs Should I take a dip or not 98 in CA! - Duration: 11:23.

Nice Summer Day here in CA...

Vieo by; Nicole Gaspard

For more infomation >> Nicole's Vlogs Should I take a dip or not 98 in CA! - Duration: 11:23.

-------------------------------------------

Longevity Grows in Vietnam Being Thrown Out Without Knowing or Knowing - Duration: 2:04.

For more infomation >> Longevity Grows in Vietnam Being Thrown Out Without Knowing or Knowing - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

''WHERE DID YOU GROW, HONG KONG OR SOMETHING!!?'' ((LEVEL UP)) - Duration: 3:10.

Oh, it's over with...

((MANDARIN)) You must be Chinese?

((MANDARIN)) Are you Chinese?

((MANDARIN)) Do you speak Mandarin?

((MANDARIN)) Yes, I can

((MANDARIN)) Then we can use Chinese to speak

((MANDARIN)) OK, we can

((MANDARIN)) How much did you pay for those, are they real?

((MANDARIN)) I'm not sure if they're real or not, but my wife bought them for me in Taiwan

((MANDARIN)) Ohm your wife is Taiwanese?

((MANDARIN)) Yes

((MANDARIN))That's good stuff there

((MANDARIN)) Thank you

((MANDARIN)) Why don't you sell it to me?

hahahahahha

((MANDARIN)) No way

((MANDARIN)) My wife will kick my butt

((MANDARIN)) That's right

((MANDARIN)) You speak well

((MANDARIN)) Thanks

((MANDARIN)) But my wife doesn't have anything with me being able to speak Chinese though

((MANDARIN)) Did you go to school or something?

((MANDARIN)) I'm self-taught. I studied at my house the whole time

((MANDARIN)) ''CLOSE THE DOOR AND CREATE THE VEHICLE'' Do you know that expression?

((MANDARIN)) This is an idioma

((MANDARIN)) This expression describes a person who teaches himself to do a certain thing, right?

((MANDARIN)) Very good

((MANDARIN)) Excellent!

((MANDARIN)) He's from Burma. He's Chinese, but his parents grew up in Burma

((MANDARIN)) This is my teacher

((MANDARIN)) I want to learn Burmese so I often practice with him. He teaches me Burmese and I teach him Chinese

((MANDARIN)) So, perhaps in this aspect I can say ''Kill two birds with one stone''

((MANDARIN)) Does that make sense?

((MANDARIN)) If I use ''Kill two birds with one stone''

((MANDARIN)) Kill two birds with one stone

((MANDARIN)) Very smart!

((MANDARIN)) Nah, what part of China are you from?

((MANDARIN)) Guangzhou, China

((CANTONESE)) Then you speak Chinese?

((CANTONESE)) Oh, you also speak Cantonese, awesome

((CANTONESE)) Yea, I can speak Cantonese

((CANTONESE)) Because lately I've been studying Cantonese because...

''Where you grow?!!''

ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLMMMMMMFFFFFFFFAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For more infomation >> ''WHERE DID YOU GROW, HONG KONG OR SOMETHING!!?'' ((LEVEL UP)) - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Understanding energy leaks or, Seven Ways to keep your Mojo - Duration: 19:26.

Understanding energy leaks or, Seven Ways to keep your Mojo

by Edward Morgan

In the yoga tradition we encounter a fascinating metaphor: it is said that the milk of a lioness

is so potent that no container can hold it except for pure gold. If the golden vessel

has impurities, the milk will eat through the vessel like acid at those points, and

drain away. In the same way, if the practitioner has too many �energy leaks� then the spiritual

energy (shakti) that is generated through yogic practice will simply leak away again.

Have you ever been to a yoga retreat or meditation weekend that was so inspiring and empowering

that you felt sure your life was going to change radically, only to find within days

or weeks of returning home that all that extra juice had seeped away, returning you to much

the same default state you had before the retreat? If so, you�re not alone. This is

a very common experience. Because energy leaks.

Once you know what the main energy leaks are, you can set about plugging them. If you manage

to plug most of them, you will experience something astonishing: the very same yogic

practices you�ve been doing all along now seem to generate much more power, energy,

pra?a. In fact, they�re not generating more, you�re just not leaking it away.

Systematically addressing these �leaks� shifts the playing field of spiritual practice

radically. Of course, it can take time to address them � but it�s time and effort

well-spent, that repays its investment more generously than you might imagine.

So, what are the most common energy leaks? Here is a short explanation of each major

energy leak. They are discussed in more detail in my six-month Immersion program.

1. Exhaustion due to overdoing/multi-tasking

Easily the most common energy leak in today�s society, overdoing means having a plate that

is too full, leaving little time for the relaxation, play, and social bonding that humans evolved

with for most of their history. These are not only necessary for health, they create

a body-mind container that can hold the energy generated by spiritual practice. By contrast,

an exhausted body-mind is riddled with �holes� out of which that energy drains away. Your

conditioned mind might be convinced that you can�t afford to do less; but really, you

can�t afford not to. (And by the way, if you use stimulants [caffeine etc.] every day,

you are exhausted, though you might not feel it.) As Sakta-saiva teacher Dharmabodhi says,

�Wake up out of the dream of over-doing. Take responsibility for your runaway life.

Closely examine the cultural trance of over-doing, expose it and tune into your own energies

instead. Follow a simpler and more natural way of living, [which is actually] a more

productive way of living.�

Oh and by the way, however proud you are of your ability to multi-task, it�s now been

proven that multitasking decreases your effectiveness at all tasks (see the work of John Medina).

Most importantly, according to the yoga tradition, to be healthy and sane one needs to have at

least four hours off a day, at least one full day off a week, at least one full weekend

off a month, and at least three full weeks off a year. When I say �off� I don�t

just mean not being in the office � I mean not checking emails, not thinking about to-do

lists, not accomplishing anything. Just being. Unscheduled time, free of agenda, unless it

be the �agenda� to connect with yourself, your loved ones, nature, and/or art. Just

look at kids who haven�t yet become addicted to glowing screens, if you can find any: they

explore the world around them with wide-eyed wonder, and their creative energy flows through

vivid imaginative play. We�re not meant to lose that. It�s part of our natural state.

We need that creative energy, that curiosity, that wonder, to feel that life is worth living.

You will slowly access more and more of it if you create time for agenda-free connection.

2. Dis-ease of the physical body

The second energy leak is of course intimately related to the first. When we�re overdoing,

we develop dis-ease (or full blown disease) quite easily. When dis-ease has set in, it

draws our attention and leaks our pra?a (vitality or life-force). Dis-ease is different from

being disabled; note that someone can be disabled or have a chronic condition without having

dis-ease. It all depends on how they relate to their disability (e.g. how much they focus

on it, whether they form a self-image out of it, and what mental frame they view it

through). Dis-ease is listed as the second most important energy leak because if it is

occurring, it�s a top priority to address. Your body is full of wisdom. Often (not always),

illness or dis-ease is a warning sign, or is telling your something. Inquire into the

natural wisdom of the body to find out what it is, perhaps with the help of a skilled

medical intuitive (I can recommend someone) � whose services should complement, never

replace, those of your doctor(s).

3. Excess emotional reactivity

This is a delicate one to discuss. As a cognitive neuroscientist recently wrote, �The ability

to regulate one�s strength of emotional response is highly adaptive: It stops us from

investing too much energy into [certain] things.� While there is no degree of emotion that is

�too much� in the Tantrik View, it�s important to note that some emotions are generated

or amplified by believing in a mentally-constructed �story� about a situation. This very common

energy leak can be described as losing contact with your essence-nature, your natural Presence,

through buying into a story associated with a strong emotional response, which often results

in throwing your energy at someone else (usually the person you blame for your feelings). When

you speak in anger and say things you later want to retract (�I didn�t really mean

that!�), that�s a good example of emotional reactivity. When you sit (or move, or dance)

with your feelings, neither owning nor disowning them, but just being with them as a form of

pure energy, that�s the opposite of emotional reactivity. When your assumptions seem like

indisputable facts and you�re filled with self-righteous indignation, that�s emotional

reactivity. When you�re curious about where these intense emotions are coming from and

can laugh at yourself in wonder, that�s the opposite. When you buy right into a disparaging

comment from a peer and enter a world of hurt, plagued by repetitive painful thoughts (�How

could they?� �What an asshole!� �I can�t believe s/he hates me!� etc.), that�s

emotional reactivity. When you keep your heart open and let yourself feel the pain in the

other person and in yourself, without buying that person�s story and perhaps even seeing

beauty and opportunity in the pain, that�s the opposite.

The opposite of emotional reactivity, then, is really just natural human Presence. To

abide in that Presence is the goal of the path. Then strong emotions can arise without

the emotional reactivity that harms you and others. Obviously, emotional reactivity deserves

a whole workshop to itself. It�s intimately related with #9 below.

4. Losing contact with natural Presence through thought/fantasy/reverie

Those who habitually dwell in the mind-world can hardly imagine how much joy and aliveness

is unavailable to them. Unfortunately, that�s most of the planet. Being lost in vikalpas

(fantasy/reverie/mental images) is a primary way we divorce ourselves from sweet, simple

abiding in our natural state. Here we�re talking about a) imagining possible future

scenarios in which you might be happier (fantasy); b) imagining possible future scenarios in

which you might suffer (anxiety); c) remembering past �good times� through rose-colored

glasses and wishing things could be like that again (reverie); and remembering past �mistakes�

and thinking about what you �could have� or �should have� done (regret/guilt).

(See p. 138 of T.I.) These four are, in the yogic view, simply the most common forms of

insanity. Humans are simply terrible at accurately predicting how they�ll feel in any given

future situation, even when they�re convinced otherwise (as Dan Gilbert has proven), and

they are also terrible at remembering the past with any accuracy (what you think are

accurate memories are largely expressions of your individual psychology, much like dreams

woven from elements of past experiences). A fifth version of getting lost in vikalpas

is simply focusing intently on data of any kind to buffer your existential angst or distract

yourself from what you and others are feeling. Someone doing a crossword puzzle or playing

a challenging video game or reading all the news of the day might claim that they are

more in the present moment, but they are just as much �in their head� � and therefore

divorced from flowing Presence � as someone lost in thoughts of possible futures or remembered

pasts. Inhabiting mental worlds and imagined realities is a significant energy leak for

a yogi, and one that is ubiquitous in our society.

5. Strongly held beliefs or opinions

This is closely related to #4. It can be hard to believe this is an energy leak until you

experience for yourself the influx of life-force that comes from finally, deeply admitting

the truth that you really don�t know anything for sure. That just about all your strongly

held beliefs and opinions are either wishful thinking or fearful thinking. That the world

is far, far too complex, and the variables far too numerous, for our little brains to

justifiably hold a fixed opinion about anything (apart from your own inner experience, perhaps).

Note that having beliefs/opinions is not an energy leak; it�s gripping tightly to those

opinions, unyielding and hard in your attitude rather than soft and open, and being so convinced

you�re right and you know how things really are (as opposed to the other guy) that is

the energy leak. There�s a lot more to reality than what any one of us can see; acknowledging

that helps you be softer, more open, and therefore better at connecting with others.

6. Unclear relationships / unclear boundaries

Since the entire range of social norms pertaining to all kinds of intimate relationships is

in flux in the 21st century, #6 is a pretty big one. Of course, when you�re just getting

to know someone, it�s normal for the nature of the relationship to be undefined. However,

hanging out too long in limbo where you�re not exactly sure what the other person wants,

needs, or feels, but you�re hoping they�ll come round to your way of seeing the relationship,

is a powerful pra?a-drain. Conversely, being clear about where you�re at but keeping

the other person in limbo by not committing to a specific form of relationship with clear

agreements or boundaries is also an energy leak (because using other people depletes

your shakti).

Obviously, the solution is communication, but few of us know how to communicate our

feelings and needs without casting them in the form of a narrative about what the other

person is doing wrong (or what you�re doing wrong, for that matter). Which doesn�t help.

Ongoing clarifying dialogue (which doesn�t descend into nitpicking, pseudo-psychoanalysis,

or finger-pointing) about what you want and what you�re okay with, and what your loved

one wants and is okay with, is crucial to create the firm foundation for relationships

that aren�t energy leaks.

Except sometimes the solution isn�t communication; sometimes you hang on to a relationship that

is past it�s �expiration date� out of fear or attachment. This is a huge energy

leak. The solution is to let go and walk away. If you need support for that, check out Conscious

Uncoupling.

7. Unconscious speech / excessive speech / gossip

Another very common energy leak in our society, this one is difficult to shift because of

huge social pressure to conform to how others around us use language. Yet excessive speech

is such an energy drain that in Ayurveda it is said to lead to various forms of disease

(mainly through exacerbation of vata dosha). Have you ever noticed that masters of yoga

and meditation speak less, and speak carefully? Swami Muktananda once said, �The power of

your words increases in direct proportion to the silence that you keep.�

Ideally, before opening a topic of conversation we ask ourselves four questions, the so-called

Four Gates of Speech: 1) is it true, this thing I want to say? 2) is it necessary or

helpful to speak it? 3) have I found a loving way to say it? 4) is it the right time? (It

helps to remember the four key terms: true, necessary, kind, right time). For more on

this important topic, see the two chapters on �Discipline in Speaking� in The Yoga

of Discipline.

So how do you plug the energy leaks? Suggestions and leads have been given above, and these

can be supplemented by your own research, your intuitive knowing, and by practicing

under a qualified teacher. Specifically, the tradition of Tantrik Yoga has many tools for

plugging energy leaks.

There is so much more than can be said about all of these topics than we have space for

here! Below you�ll find the other seven main energy leaks, which I hope to cover in

another post. And if you resonate with what you�ve read here and want to learn more,

please watch these videos.

Based on everything I�ve received from my teachers over 26 years, I made a list of the

eight most hazardous pitfalls on the spiritual path, which when addressed are also, in my

view, the eight keys to sustainable awakening. The topic of Energy Leaks constitutes just

one of these eight. Some of the others are obvious, such as distorted understanding of

the student-teacher relationship, and some are not so obvious, like lack of alignment

of View, Practice, and Goal, or impure motive for practice. These �Eight Great Pitfalls�

which can become the �Eight Keys to sustainable Awakening� are discussed in more detail

in this video.

Other energy leaks include: 8. addictions

9. other habitual behavior patterns fueled by and further fueling samskaras

10. mismanagement of sexual energy 11. submitting to fatalism and disempowering

use of divination tools (e.g. relying on astrology, tarot, or psychic readings more than on your

innate intuitive capacity) 12. incorrect performance of spiritual practices

(usually due to incorrect instruction) 13. becoming �possessed� by the energy

and thought-patterns of other Realms (�realm� is a technical term in Tantrik psychology)

14. believing that one�s conditioned view of reality is actually the way things are

(aj�ana)

IMPORTANT CAVEAT: If you succeed in plugging energy leaks but have not learned to dissolve

self-images and have not become conscious of the pitfalls described in the Six Realms

teachings (#13 above), then the greatly increased energy and power available to you can magnify

latent harmful tendencies as well as virtues. As Dharmabodhi so aptly put it, �Without

having dissolved the core patterning of how one sees and �knows� oneself to be (our

self-story/concept) and how one relates, the power released through shakti sadhana will

inflate the already existing [egoic] patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting, often causing

harm to the practitioner by sidetracking them with obstacles or skills/successes/powers.�

This topic will be covered in a future post entitled �Does the Practice of Yoga Automatically

Make You a Better Person?; or, how yoga can turn a

jerk into an even bigger jerk.�

For more infomation >> Understanding energy leaks or, Seven Ways to keep your Mojo - Duration: 19:26.

-------------------------------------------

Eurovision 2017 - Big 5: Privilege or Curse? - Duration: 8:27.

Hi guys and welcome back to "Chev's Choice".

First of all I want to thank all of you for the love and support that I got on my last,

very personal video.

I'm so glad that I could reach and maybe even help some of you that deal with similar issues.

So I will definitely do videos like that from time to time.

If you haven't seen the video, you find it up here.

But now let's talk about Eurovision.

Today I want to talk about an issue that was requested in a comment, and I thought it's

a great topic to discuss, because most people have an opinion on it but it's mostly only

seen from one perspective.

So I'm trying to give a little more insight into two questions here.

The first: Are the big 5 as generous as they claim to be, and therefore do they deserve

an advantage in the game?

And second: Is automatic qualification actually a advantage worth fighting for?

But I'm not a journalist, so If I say something wrong just correct me in the comments.

Let's go

France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom automatically qualified for the Grand Final

since the introduction of a Semi-Final in 2004 after already having the privilege of

participation regardless of their previous results, other than the rest of the countries

that were excluded if they ranked too low in the past 5 years.

They were joined by Italy after their return in 2011.

Quite a few arguments are used to justify this decision.

Some say those are the countries that reach the most viewers (where is Russia though?),

others say they are the biggest market to sell music in Europe (where's Russia though?).

But the main argument that is used is that the big 5 were allowed this privilege based

on their higher financial contribution to the contest compared to the rest of the countries,

which by the way is not made out of good will by those countries but because the allocation

system of the application fees by the EBU - which is based on the country's relative

financial status and number of potential viewers - works that way.

So it's the EBU's system that decides the fees, not the countries themselves, to

assure that countries are able to compete that couldn't afford otherwise.

Not a lot of numbers are actually made public, but from what can be found, the fees for the

big 5 lie around 350'000,- € while the other countries pay somewhere between 25 and

250.000 €. So yes, the big 5 might pay 1 or 200,000 € more than others, but compared

to what a broadcaster spends to produce 8 hours of prime time show themselves, or to

buy the rights of broadcasting a single soccer championship game for instance, that's peanuts.

Of course that fee is only one part of the costs, the other being accommodation of the

delegation, stylists, rehearsals, the whole performance, etc.

But that can be as high or as little as the countries want them to be and have no influence

on the contest as a whole.

So the financial argument of automatic qualification to the final is actually ridiculous in my

opinion.

The big 5 might be more financially important members of the EBU in general for instance

for sports events and things like that, but that has nothing to do directly with the Song

Contest and shouldn't have any influence in its outcome.

Also let's not forget that the biggest cut of the costs by far is payed by the hosting

country.

The big 5's collected contribution sum up to around 12 % of the total costs while the

host country alone is responsible for around 30% with a minimum of 5 million € charged

by the EBU.

So the only country deserving some form of acknowledgement should be the host.

But in general, is it fair that some countries pay more than others?

If you look at it like a regular contest where everyone is equal, maybe not.

But a show like that simply isn't possible if everyone pays the same.

Either it is too expensive for some countries to participate in the first place or the show

needs to be downsized or stripped back by for instance having the same stage design

every year to save costs, which makes the show a lot less exciting for everyone.

So I do in fact think it is fair to have a calculation based on the country's financial

capacity.

And based on the small differences between the fees for country 5 to country 6 or from

6 to 7, there is one obvious question: tell me baby where we draw the line?

why have a big 5 and not 6 or 4 or 10?

But there's one argument that always comes up that I haven't yet talked about:

The power of each televote.

Germany's population is much higher than Denmark's, so a single vote by someone in Germany has

a smaller effect on the final points given out as a whole, compared to someone in Denmark.

But if that's an issue we have to redefine the whole base of the contest.

I love that it's an imaginative and comparably peaceful battle between 43 countries and not

"just" a song contest, where we get the results by counting every vote separately.

In that case we could eliminate the country system completely and have just 43 independent

acts fight for the best song like every other show on TV.

But That would take away so much of what makes the ESC so exciting.

So in conclusion to the first question I personally I think the big 5 status should be revoked.

There's simply not enough merit to justify giving exactly and only those 5 countries

a better position in the contest, which brings me to the second question:

Is there actually an advantage in automatic qualification?

The big 5 haven't competed in a semi final since they were introduced in 2004.

Let's have a look at their average ranking since then:

France with an average of 18.3 Germany 16.8

Italy (after they returned in 2011): 9.7 Spain with18.3

and the UK with 19.5

So surprisingly they lie quite close together apart from Italy, and less surprisingly far

away from being in the top 10 – apart from Italy.

And what surprised me the most was that even after the jury votes were reintroduced in

2009 the average scores did change only by around half a place while Spain ranked even

worse than before.

Even though the juries were brought back to a large part to balance out political votes

that were said to especially privilege eastern European countries and therefore minimize

the chances of the big 5.

Clearly it didn't influence the big 5's chances though.

So it seems that the fear of the big 5, or at least the original big 4 not to qualify

if they competed in the semi finals seems justified when they ranked in the lower third

most years, right?

But clearly there's no obvious advantage in it either, except being able to say they were

in the final and closing their eyes to how low they would have actually ranked among

all the contestants.

So they never really get a real feedback on their entries as well.

If they failed to qualify in the semis for a couple of years, maybe they would see more

clearly what they did wrong and can reassess their selection for next year.

I have no doubt at all that with a good entry their chances are just like every other country's.

I can't imagine that France wouldn't have qualified last year, Italy probably would

have qualified most of the time.

Clearly Germany wouldn't have for the past few years, but for good reasons, because they

simply didn't deliver good enough entries.

And I'm from Switzerland, so I know what I'm talking about.

Maybe they would finally send acts that are actually representative of their music market.

France seems to have learned that with Amir and Alma that are very current french pop

songs.

And the UK has brought up so many great musicians that I'm always disappointed with what ends

up at Eurovision.

Of course once you're in a downward spiral the really popular acts maybe don't want to

be associated with the Eurovision and facing a zero point disaster.

But still they should be able to find talented musicians and song writers that come up with

a real and original song that's not based on a Eurovision formula.

Show us what your countries are made of.

Give us something like Rita Ora or Adele instead of electro velvet.

Give us something like Helene Fischer instead of Jamie-Lee.

Show us what you're country is made of instead of buying yourself a ticket for the final

and always looking for new ways to feel underprivileged.

I'm sure the audience would appreciate that much more.

And by that they could also broadcast the semi finals on their main channel because

people would be interested in watching their own country and their competition, and if

they had sent something worth qualifying cheer for them in the finals.

That way they would also get the full potential out of what they payed for instead of broadcasting

just the final to the broad audience.

So as a short conclusion.

I don't see any value in the big 5 idea.

Neither for them nor for the audience.

I think it's purely a fear of facing the actual problem which lies in the selection of the

songs.

But now I'm interested in what you think?

Did you like this video?

Do you agree with the points I've made or do you think I've missed something important?

Tell me everything in the comments below.

And to make up for this little bashing of the big 5 I'm planning a small hommage to

them in my next video.

If you want to see that, subscribe to my channel, so you don't miss it.

For now thank you for watching and goodbye.

For more infomation >> Eurovision 2017 - Big 5: Privilege or Curse? - Duration: 8:27.

-------------------------------------------

Dosa Idli Batter Recipe | डोसा बेटर बनाने की विधि | Homemade Dosa Idli Batter - Duration: 5:01.

For more infomation >> Dosa Idli Batter Recipe | डोसा बेटर बनाने की विधि | Homemade Dosa Idli Batter - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's glorious first 100 days More frightening or more pathetic - Duration: 9:01.

President Trump�s glorious first 100 days More frightening or more pathetic

There is a lot of chatter these days about the looming milestone of the �first 100

days� of the Donald Trump administration and how he measures up in presidential history.

This trope goes back to Franklin Roosevelt�s first term, when he took office in 1933 amid

the Great Depression, the worst economic crisis in America history, and promised to get to

work immediately to bring relief to millions of suffering Americans.

He declared a bank holiday to stop the run on withdrawals and immediately called Congress

into session seeking to pass legislation to help farmers and unemployed people and create

a federal jobs program.

Since then, all presidents come up for a 100-day report card.

Most recently, President Barack Obama entered office during a major economic upheaval unleashed

by a global financial crisis that had unfolded during the presidential campaign.

He warned that it wasn�t going to be easy, asking for the nation�s patience and saying,

�The first hundred days is going to be important, but it�s probably going to be the first

thousand days that makes the difference.�

During his transition period, Obama had been focused on finding bipartisan support for

a stimulus plan to stop the bleeding of jobs and home foreclosures and managed to get it

passed in eight days, with support from a handful of Republicans.

He passed a budget resolution and signed major legislation on workers� rights and health

care that had been stalled or vetoed under President George W. Bush.

Obama also issued executive orders on numerous topics, from closing the prison at Guant�namo

Bay to new government ethics rules.

At the 100-day mark, 65 percent of Americans polled said they approved of the job he was

doing, with only 29 percent disapproving.

President Trump's glorious first 100 days: More frightening or more pathetic?

Back on the campaign trail in 2016, Donald Trump portrayed the nation as a desperate

dystopian hellscape and promised his adoring followers that he would make America great

again.

But he he went beyond that.

Decrying NAFTA and inner-city crime, vowing to bring back jobs and go after undocumented

immigrants, undo regulations and fight ISIS, Trump promised to fix it all �very, very

quickly.� Sometimes he�d add that it would �happen so fast your head will spin.�

Indeed, Trump�s pitch to his voters was that none of these were difficult issues and

the problem had been our �stupid� leaders who just didn�t know what they were doing.

He famously said in his nomination acceptance speech at the Republication convention, �I

alone can fix it,� making it clear that he planned to do it all at once.

Just before the election, Trump released his plan for the first 100 days and it was extremely

ambitious.

He promised to reverse every Obama executive order he could think of and issue as many

of his own as possible on the very first day.

His ill-conceived travel ban was the most controversial and a few of his promises, like

his pledge to �propose a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members

of Congress,� have been quietly shelved.

Others, in light of subsequent events, now seem mordantly amusing, such as �a lifetime

ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.�

Trump didn�t manage to do everything on his list the first day but he fulfilled many

of those promises during the first few months, most of them serving as props for his tedious

daily signing photo ops, even if they don�t really add up to any substantial accomplishments.

And while his �big, beautiful wall� may be indefinitely put on hold (because it was

an imbecilic idea in the first place), he�s made real progress on his draconian immigration

crackdown.

The Department of Homeland Security under former Gen. John Kelly and the Department

of Justice under Jeff Sessions have most definitely taken off the gloves, and plans are underway

for an even more drastic crackdown.

In fact, Sessions is systematically carrying out Trump�s �law and order� campaign

pledges by turning back voting rights enforcement, �reviewing� police consent decrees, talking

up the drug war and rejecting forensic science that leads to fewer innocent people being

convicted.

But presidents are generally not considered to have had a successful first 100 days without

any major legislative achievement, particularly when their party controls both houses of Congress.

And the great negotiator presented himself as someone who could make �deals� almost

magically.

Indeed, it was the single most important skill he allegedly possessed.

He was so good at it he would make Mexico pay for the wall and singlehandedly renegotiate

all the trade deals so thoroughly that our trading partners would give up all their jobs

and profits and thank us for the privilege.

Unfortunately for the president, he does not have even one real legislative victory.

His most substantial achievement is a bill letting hunters kill bear cubs in their dens

while hibernating.

His only serious attempt at negotiating a legislative deal was so badly botched it ended

in ignominious failure after just 18 days of debate in the House.

That, of course, was the health care bill meant to �repeal and replace� Obamacare.

Recent rumors of a quick revival are, according to savvy observers, a product of White House

hype and desperation for a 100-day �win,� rather than a sign of any real movement on

the issue.

In other words, Trump�s 100-day achievements have consisted of his signing of some orders,

having his picture taken with people around a big table, instituting �law and order�

through his henchman Jeff Sessions � and failing to get even one major piece of legislation

passed into law, despite his party�s congressional majorities.

According to the latest Gallup poll, he has the worst average approval rating (41 percent)

during this period of any president in that survey�s history, and by a margin of 14

points.

Nonetheless, Trump says it�s been the most successful first 100 days in history, telling

Fox Business News:

We freed up so much and we�re getting great, great credit for it.

We have done so much for so many people.

I don�t think that there is a presidential period of time in the first 100 days where

anyone has done nearly what we�ve been able to do.

To borrow one of his favorite phrases: That�s fake news.

And it�s so profoundly delusional that it�s actually kind of sad.

For more infomation >> President Trump's glorious first 100 days More frightening or more pathetic - Duration: 9:01.

-------------------------------------------

Christy Mack- Life-or-Death Decision: Real Sports Bonus Clip (HBO) - Duration: 0:55.

DAVID SCOTT: In a way, this was a life or death decision for you.

You said, "If he ever gets out, he will kill me."

And you said it with absolute conviction.

Yes, and I still feel the same way.

I know so many other women and men also feel

the same way when their abuser gets out.

They don't know what's going to happen.

At one point, the defense had asked us for an offer,

and, of course, I consulted with the district attorney

-and... and with Chris-- -Plea bargain.

Yes. And, um, we had come to an agreement that

we would offer him minimum of 16 years,

a maximum of life in prison.

And I talked to Christy about it.

And I'll never forget what she said,

'cause she turned at me and she said,

"Well, you know, I trust you." She goes,

"At least I know I have 16 more years to live."

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét