Cong Minh blog: Youtube daily is it Jan 2 2018

Hey guys and girls!

Welcome back to the Bitcoin series where we try to find a way to make a passive income

through digital currency mining.

In this episode, we ask the question "What Is A Bitcoin Wallet And How Does It Work?"

to give you guys a better understanding of where to put your precious coins when you

buy them.

My name is Jake Owens and this is Millionaire Mindset Hub.

Alright, let's get into it.

If you have a credit card or use cash in the real world then you probably own a wallet.

They're traditionally leather which you flip open to reveal pockets to hold your credit

and identification cards, maybe keys and a space to hold your cash or other long and

thin paper items.

So, you already know what a wallet is an essentially what a Bitcoin wallet is, sometimes referred

to as a digital wallet is because it's the exact same concept.

However, instead of being a physical product that you keep in your pocket, it's a very

sophisticated software that stores your cryptocurrency virtually.

Now, before we delve into the various wallet types, it's important to tell you guys what

a public and private key are as this can determine what wallet you choose.

A public key is in the name, it's an alphanumeric address that you provide to the public which

they can use to send you coins.

Whereas a private key is the opposite, it's the key which you need to keep safe and secure

as it's the alphanumeric code which allows you to send coins to other people.

So if someone else gets their hands on it they could send themselves all of your coins.

To own Bitcoins, or any cryptocurrency you need a digital wallet.

Which there are five types to choose from.

A desktop wallet, a mobile wallet, a web wallet, a hardware wallet and a cold wallet.

Desktop wallets as you'd imagine are installed on a desktop computer giving you, the user,

the ability of complete control over that wallet enabling you to create a Bitcoin address

for sending and receiving cryptocurrencies.

Mobile wallets can be seen as a step up from desktop wallets in the fact that they aren't

fixed to a single location.

So unless you're one of those people in the habit of carrying their desktop around everywhere

they go, a mobile wallet allows you to send and receive Bitcoins and other digital currencies

anywhere you are in the world as long as you have an internet connection.

Once you get the wallet app working on your phone properly it works just the same as the

desktop wallet where you're able to comepletely control that wallet and all of your coins

inside.

The mobile wallet also allows for a touch to pay payment method by scanning a QR code

which allows you to pay for things similarly to 'Apple Pay'.

Then there are web wallets.

These are online wallets you access through a desktop or mobile on a browser like Chrome,

Firefox or Safari.

These are the same as a mobile or desktop wallet where you have control over your coins

and can send or receive money at any time and from anywhere as long as you're logged

into your account using that same QR code or through account transactions.

Then there are hardware wallets.

These are basically devices that can hold private keys electronically and create payments

but are still in the development phase and have not been released just yet.

And lastly, there is cold storage.

Which essentially is an offline method of safeguarding your coins.

This is where your coins are on a platform that is never connected to the internet, protecting

it from unauthorised access, cyberattacks and other abilities that come with online

access.

These could be things like a USB stick that is never connected to a computer that is online

or it could be a piece of paper.

The desktop and mobile wallets are relatively safe since the key is stored on the actual

device.

So someone would have to physically steal your computer or phone to have access to that

private key.

Cold storage is a method allowing you to keep your private key completely offline so there's

no chance or ability for outsiders to remotely access your private key.

They would have to physically take the device where the key is stored.

Even on desktop and mobile, there are threats of hackers being able to log into your computer

or mobile remotely and have access to your wallet that way.

You can do cold storage by filing your private key on a USD stick, CD, Hard Drive, Paper

or a computer that never goes online.

Because the key would never have access to the internet, your key would therefore be

100% safe unless someone physically stole that device that you had your private key

on.

And the least secure way to store your private key is using an online wallet because anyone

in the world is able to gain access to your wallet souley through a username and password.

So taking all factors into consideration, what I would recommend, is using a mobile

wallet if you're intending to spend your coins.

But if you're not it's best to use a cold storage method for maximum security.

Even having a piece of paper and filing it away into a bank vault could be your best

option.

So, taking all factors into consideration what I would recommend is using a mobile wallet

if you're intending to spend your coins, if you're not it's best to use a cold storage

method for maximum security.

Even having a piece of paper and filing it away into a bank vault could be your best

option.

So in conclusion, when you have a wallet you have two keys, a public key and a private

key.

A public key is the key you give people so that they can send you money, whereas a private

key is your key you use to send other people money.

There are multiple ways to store your keys, you can use a desktop wallet, a mobile wallet,

a web based wallet, a hardware wallet and finally cold storage.

Cold storage is the most secure way to store your currency from hackers as your wallet

never touches the internet.

The web based wallet is the least secure method as it can be quite easy to figure out someones

username and password.

So I would suggest something in the middle, like a mobile wallet so it gives you the freedom

to be able to make transactions from anywhere in the world that you have an internet connection.

Hey guys and girls!

Thanks for watching, I hope you enjoyed the episode.

If it provided you with any value and you feel that way inclined feel free to hit that

subscribe button and like the video.

If you've got any questions or would just like to reach out and say "Hi!" feel free

to do so in the comment section below or feel free to PM me.

In the next episode, I'll be doing some reviews of wallets that you can use.

Again, thanks a ton for watching.

I'll see you guys in the next episode!

Cheers! :D

For more infomation >> What Is A Bitcoin Wallet And How Does It Work? - Duration: 7:15.

-------------------------------------------

Is The Popular Dry January All It's Cracked Up To Be? - Duration: 2:26.

For more infomation >> Is The Popular Dry January All It's Cracked Up To Be? - Duration: 2:26.

-------------------------------------------

Is it permissible for a Muslim to say "Happy New Year"? - Duration: 9:54.

Some of the Muslims congratulate one another at the beginning of the year, saying 'Happy

New Year" and the like.

Prophet (SAW) did not used to congratulate people because of the beginning of the year

or because of the day they were born.

And would it have been good, the peophet (SAW) would've done it (ASW), because he was sent

by Allah to teach people everything good, in this life and the hereafter.

And to warn against every evil in this

life and the hereafter.

In an hadith sahih Muslim, so it was upon the prophets of Allah to teach people whatsoever

of good they know, for them.

To warn against whatsoever evil, any evil thing they know.

So since the prophet (SAW) didn't teach people, it shouldn't be done.

And if someone has this principle, you have this principle, what prophet (SAW) did, legislate

it, said it, accepted it, alhamdulillah you do it the way he did it.

But if he (SAW) didn't do it, you leave it.

Because from the sunnah, what prophet (SAW) left, you leave it (ASW).

Some people think the sunnah is only what the prophet (SAW) did, you do it.

They don't know that even what he didn't do, what he left alone, to leave it alone is also

sunnah.

Therefore Umar (RA) as in sahih Buhari, when he kissed the black stone, he said " if it

was not that I've seen the messenger of Allah (SAW) kissing you oh black stone", the best

stone on earth is the black stone in the Ka'bah; that's from the jannah.

Back then it used to be white when Allah sent it down.

It turned to black because of the sins of the mushrikoons; sound hadith shows that.

So Umar (RA), he's talking to the black stone, he doesn't mean the black stone, he meant

the people, those around him and those who will come after him.

Because Umar, he's one of the sahabas who was commanded to follow his way.

peophet (SAW) said "follow the two who are after me, Abubakar and Umar" (RA).

So Umar he says, teaching people that sunnah, "oh black stone if I hadn't seen the messenger

of Allah kissing you I wouldn't kiss you."

Yes with the status of the black stone, the position the black stone is, where it came

from, how many prophets kissed the black stone.

Prophet (SAW), he was following them when he did that.

He himself (AS) was following the religion of prophet Ibrahim.

Prophet Ibrahim was following those before him, nam.

The Ka'bah is a place of worship for all humans, even prophet Adam.

The first house (built for worship), place for the people, for humans on the earth is

the one in Makkah, Allah said (SWT).

And from the humans Adam, and Nuh, and the others.

So prophet (SAW), Umar said to the stone "if I hadn't seen the messenger of Allah kissing

you I wouldn't kiss you," this is sahih Buhari by the way, sound narration.

So why?

Because Umar when he saw prophet (SAW) see the black stone, when he saw other stuff he

didn't kiss them; he considered that sunnah.

When he saw the black stone, the prophet (SAW) kissing it, he saw this as exceptional.

Based on that he kissed the black stone; not to worship it.

You don't kiss the black stone to seek blessings, baraka to follow, nothing of that.

Don't have even that aqeedah, that by touching the black stone blessings will be upon you;

no!

Rather you do what the prophet (SAW) did.

Let alone a black stone that special; some people even when they greet someone they honor

or someone who they think he is good or she's good, and they greet, they have the feelings

of that they're receiving blessings from the hand of that person.

This is not correct understanding; that was only a baraka for the prophet (SAW).

So to leave off what the prophet (SAW) left off is sunnah, nam; so not to congratulate

on a new year.

Also, the new year, what year?

Some people, they congratulate you this year, to the new year counting from those months

of January, February.

So January is the first month of the new year.

Who made that month the first of the year?

Muslims have other (different) calendar, they count it.

Umar himself (RA) is the one who started it, again sunnah.

He started it from the hijrah of the prophet (SAW), when the peophet (SAW) migrated from

Makkah to Madina.

Thus, today is the month of Rabi al-akhirah 23 (13), 1439, if I'm not mistaken.

Anyway, so even that is the year.

So now it's not new year in the Islamic calendar.

Now it's the 4th month; Muharram, Safar, Rabi Awwal, Rabi al-akhirah, 4th month.

Where is the new year?

You find people saying new year, where did this come from; from the kufar, from the Christians

who started this date based on what they believe about their fake god, who they believe.

Because other than Allah, it's a fake god.

Allah is the only true God, the rest are falsohood.

Why?

Because they created nothing.

Even prophet (ASW) created nothing.

Even the food he used to eat, the water he used to drink, he didn't create them.

let alone his mother, and those before him.

Therefore he doesn't deserve to be worshipped; he shouldn't be thanked (ASW) for the blessings

that Allah gave him.

So muhim they celebrate, or they're following the date, referring to that.

So #1 this is not even (the beginning of) the Islamic.

Even had it been the (beginning of the) Islamic year itself, the Islamic calendar, the beginning

of Muharram, you don't make this kind of congratulations.

Umar who made the beginning of that calendar, he didn't use to do that when it starts.

And also related, let alone now congratulating on Christmas, and what they call Halloween,

Valentine's day or these things.

And some of these are aqeedah, worshipping other than Allah.

And some of them have evil, evil, promotion of evil things, evil desires, haram, and things

that related, and the likes.

You find Muslims congatulating one another.

Where are you akhi? you're in China, you congratulate one another where those people who may be

worshipping, if they want, some of them, Allah a'lam, dogs, congratulate.

If we're in India, those who worship cows, we congratulate and encourage them to.

We are here in Stone Mountain, those who are, majority congratulate Issah or Maryam; we

do that?

We are somewhere, Allah a'lam, Africa, they congratulate one another sheikh Tijani, we

do it.

Where are you going?

They're playing on you.

You are Muslim, sahih and sunnah.

You follow prophet (SAW), you have the best example.

So be careful, and whatever you wanna do, check what our imam, the true imam, the real

imam, the haq imam, prophet (SAW), what he did.

Through that, alhamdulillah, you may not have so much books, you may not have memorized

all of the Qur'an.

But walillahi hamd, you have a principle through which you know thousands of issues.

We ask Allahu Kareem to forgive us!

For more infomation >> Is it permissible for a Muslim to say "Happy New Year"? - Duration: 9:54.

-------------------------------------------

What is he saying?(60) (Listening Practice) [ ForB English Lesson ] - Duration: 2:27.

Hello everyone and welcome back to ForB's English lesson video.

My name is Richard and today I'm gonna say something and I'd like you to guess what I'm saying.

Are you ready?

It's getting cold.

Could you catch that?

Alright.

Let's try that again but this time with a little hint.

You ready?

It's getting cold.

Did you catch it?

Alright.

Let's try that again but this time a little bit slower.

It's getting cold.

Did you catch it?

Alright.

The answer is "It's getting cold."

Alright so the "I" in "It" is said softly and the "g" at the end of "getting" is also said softly,

and the "d" as well.

So it sounds like "It's getting cold."

It's getting cold.

Alright.

So let's practice that together.

So please repeat after me.

First slowly, then a little bit faster after that.

Are you ready?

It's getting cold.

Great.

Now let's try that a little bit faster.

It's getting cold.

Great.

Now even faster than that.

It's getting cold.

Great.

Now let's try that three times quickly.

It's getting cold.

Great.

So now you know what to say when the temperature gets cold or you are feeling cold.

You can always say "It's getting cold."

Alright.

So my name is Richard.

Thank you for watching today's video.

Remember to please click like, share and subscribe.

And I'll catch you next time.

For more infomation >> What is he saying?(60) (Listening Practice) [ ForB English Lesson ] - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

Why is it SO cold? When will it warm up? - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> Why is it SO cold? When will it warm up? - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

JBL Link 500 - Is It Better Than The Google Home Max?? - Duration: 7:17.

When the google home max was released, JBL quietly released their JBL Link 500 smart

speaker.

And basically the Link 500 does the same thing as the google home Max, its a smart speaker

thats all about sound.

So if you're thinking about getting a powerful smart speaker for your home are you better

off with Google's offering or something from a third party?

Lets find out.

JBL's link series line up now consists of 4 different speakers.

Theres the Link 10 and Link 20 which are kind of like voice assistant enabled JBL Flip 4's

which also have built in batteries, and theres the link 300 and link 500 which don't have

built in batteries.

And just like the Google home Max, the Link 500 currently costs $400.

But I wouldn't be surprised if it goes on a sale here and there.

Design wise, the JBL link 500 is slightly larger than the google home max.

It also has the same fabric outer shell thats pretty synonymous with other JBL speakers

and it comes in two colors, black or white.

Unlike the Google Home Max which has a touch sensitive touch bar on the top which only

allows you to adjust your volume and play and pause your music, the Link 500 has a few

more buttons on the top and allow you to do a little more than the max.

More importantly, it has a dedicated button so you can activate google assistant, something

that I don't understand why the max dosnt have.

And if you double press the play pause button you can skip a track directly from the speaker.

Something that again the max cant do, even though its pretty simple.

The Link 500 also has a dedicated bluetooth pairing button which does come in handy if

the Link 500 isn't connected to wifi and if you want to use a bluetooth connection

instead.

And finally theres a mic mute button.

On the front of the speaker you will also find the white led notification lights that

light up when google is listening to you just like the Max.

And on the bottom you will also find a wifi indicator light, and like I mentioned in my

link 10 and link 20 video, I feel this light is completely unnecessary… unless theres

a problem with the wifi connection theres no need to constantly keep this light on.

Even the google home max doesn't have this useless and annoying light.

Another thing I also don't like about the Link 500 is the lack of ports.

Theres no Aux jack and theres no USB type c port like the max.

For me it would have been a no brainer to include these ports on the Link 500.

And something I really want to point out is the weight differences.

The Link 500 weighs in at 7.7 ponds while the Google Home Max weighs in at 12 pounds.

But aside that, google assistant performance on the Link 500 is just as accurate and as

fast as any other google home speaker.

The Link 500 picks up your voice up from various distances just as well and inquiries are processed

just as fast.

Ok, now

lets talk about what really matters, sound.

You may know by know that the google home max is rocking dual 4.5 inch woofers and dual

.7 inch tweeters.

Where as the JBL Link 500 has dual 3.5 inch woofers, dual .8 inch tweeters and it has

an exposed passive radiator on the back that really moves when the bass really gets going.

First off, the google home max gets slightly louder than the jbl link 500 at max volume.

But only by a few decibels.

At max volume both of these speakers live in the low 80's decibel range and they both

suffer relatively the same amount of distortion.

So if loudness is your main priority then both of these speakers perform relatively

the same.

When it come to sound quality, like I've said in past videos… the max has a V shaped

sound signature.

Theres a lot of emphasis on the bass and the highs but the vocals and mids are a little

pushed back.

Where as the link 500 has an even sound signature but with an emphasis on the vocals.

It also has a good amount of bass, but the bass is not as punchy as the max and lows

don't resonate as much as the max either.

Although both of these speakers do sound really good, the sound on the max is much fuller.

You can literally feel the music with the max and as a result its more fun to listen

to.

But the google home max is definitely geared towards people how listen to pop, hip hop,

dance, R&B, or rap with its strong emphasis on the bass.

If you're somebody that loves bass then the max is great, but if you're someone

who likes a flatter sound signature then you'll be better off with the Link 500.

But if you're building out a smart home with google assistant in mind it is a great

thing to have options when it comes to hardware.

But keep in mind, 3rd party hardware might mean delays when it comes to the newest features.

First off, with JBL smart speakers you cant make phone calls like you would with either

of the google home smart speakers.

You also cant use the broadcast feature.

And the JBL link 500 also doesn't allow you to adjust the EQ like you can on the Max.

Hopefully JBL smart speakers and all other 3rd party google assistant smart speakers

will add new google home features shortly after google releases them, because I would

hate to see the same type of fragmentation android suffered when it was first released.

Although I do like the JBL link 10 and Link 20 because they sound much better than the

google home, if you're trying to decided between the Google Home Max and JBL Link 500

it think youre much better off with the Google Home Max unless you're not a fan of the

v shaped sound signature it has to offer.

I Personally think it looks better than the JBL link 500 and using Google's own hardware

means you'll have access to the newest features as soon as they drop.

But like I said in my initial review, I would like to see google add some extra tap functionally

to the max so you can control your music playback and tap to activate google assistant.

Is that so much to ask for?

For more infomation >> JBL Link 500 - Is It Better Than The Google Home Max?? - Duration: 7:17.

-------------------------------------------

Woman Live-Tweets Couple Arguing In Airport – The Ending Of It Is Winning The Internet - Duration: 2:41.

Woman Live-Tweets Couple Arguing In Airport – The Ending Of It Is Winning The Internet

In 2017, everyone should feel able to voice their own wants and needs.

Every couple does not need to have the same path, but ideally, every couple should be

supportive of their partner's decision.

Women can do just as much as men in their careers, if not more.

You'd think we'd be hearing more about supportive boyfriends and husbands, but one

story that has made the rounds on Twitter is about a very unsupportive boyfriend.

One Twitter user shared the exchange she overheard in the airport one day.Apparently, one boyfriend

didn't think that his girlfriend should accept a job.

His reason?

She'd be getting promoted and making more money than him.

Um, hello, does he know what year it is?

The Twitter user decided to live-tweet the entire fight, so all of her Twitter users

could feel involved.At first, it seemed like the woman in the relationship was going to

give up a dream job for her man.But then he went ahead and told her to do it and decided

to make things even worse for himself by digging himself a deeper hole.Apparently, mentioning

kids was not the right move.

You'd think this guy who have realized his mistake when he'd told her not to take the

job.

But to then tell her she wouldn't need it work because she'd be having their children.

Boy, he was in for it!As soon as he brought up kids, he was done for.

This wasn't a conversation, it was the end of a relationship.

This airport fight took an interesting turn after that moment.

And we can all root for this anonymous woman now!Yes, get it, girl!

Good for you!

Thank goodness she didn't give up her dream and advancement in her career for someone

who doesn't value her.

But then the story continued…While the airport suddenly became boring after their breakup,

the intrigue for the rest of us continues.

The original tweet has gone viral.

The tweet got over 34,000 likes and 11,000 retweets, with over 1,000 replies on the thread.Everyone

wanted to share their support for "Brave Airport Lady" and to let her know she made

the right choice.

The whole Twitterverse wanted to make sure she and no one else ever settled for less

than what they deserve.All of her Twitter users were so happy with how the fight ended.

Many other Twitter users shared their elation at how things went down.

For more infomation >> Woman Live-Tweets Couple Arguing In Airport – The Ending Of It Is Winning The Internet - Duration: 2:41.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News!!! THEY FOUND IT!!! COMEY Is GOING DOWN… ENJOY PRISON!! - Duration: 38:57.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News!!! THEY FOUND IT!!! COMEY Is GOING DOWN… ENJOY PRISON!! - Duration: 38:57.

-------------------------------------------

Call of Duty WW2 Season Pass | WORTH IT? - Duration: 4:33.

Hey guys, Aaron here with A/C Gaming.

Today we're talking about whether or not the Call of Duty: WWII Season Pass is worth buying.

So, let's look at the pros,

talk about the cons,

and then come up with a final decision.

So, starting with the pros,

it goes without saying: if you're a hardcore Call of Duty fan,

and you expect to be playing WW2 for a long time,

then you might as well purchase the Pass.

I think it only makes sense that, if you're going to be playing the game,

you might as well grab the DLC content.

And, getting the Season Pass is the best way to do that.

The Season Pass grants players access to 4 DLC expansion packs in 2018.

The first of these expansions is entitled, "Resistance."

This DLC attempts to recapture the civilian resistance efforts

which took place throughout Central Europe during WWII.

The expansion pack is set to bring players 3 additional multiplayer maps,

1 new map for the War game mode,

and a new map for Nazi Zombies.

Now, if Sledgehammer delivers the same amount of content in each of the 4 DLC's,

then players would get about 12 new multiplayer maps,

4 new War maps,

and 4 new Zombie maps.

In the U.S. the Season Pass costs $50.

If you're in the European Union,

it will cost you €50 - which is kind of unfair for players in the E.U.

because that's technically more money than if you were in the U.S.

And, the Pass costs about £40 in the U.K.

Now, I don't really understand Activision and Sledgehammer's pricing with the Pass.

Because the prices vary depending on what part of the world you're in -

which doesn't really make any sense.

In other words, if you're in the E.U. the Pass is going to be way more expensive

than if you're in the U.S. or the U.K.

And on that note, let's move into the cons.

Buckle up, guys! Because we're about to dive into some major issues with the Season Pass in COD WW2.

I wish I had more favorable things to say about the Pass.

But sadly, I don't.

I already mentioned the issue with the Pass pricings.

But another huge issue is that we don't even know what the other 3 DLC's will be.

I mean - take Battlefield 1's Premium Pass, for example.

Now, I know Battlefield and Call of Duty are two completely different franchises,

and their games are very different.

But, at least with Battlefield 1, we know the titles, settings, and overall concepts of the DLC's

long before they're released.

That way, we get a general idea of what we get if we purchase the Pass.

But when it comes to the Season Pass in Call of Duty WW2 ...

Well, we have no idea what the next 3 DLC's will be.

And, that's kind of a shame.

That means that players are being forced to walk into this deal blindly,

not really knowing what to expect from it.

Now, let's talk about the new maps coming in "Resistance" -

the first DLC that you get with the Season Pass.

First off, I should point out that two of the maps:

Carentan, which is currently available to Season Pass owners,

and Occupation are both retextured maps from previous Call of Duty titles.

In other words, the layouts of these maps are being reused.

The only difference is that they look different.

Honestly, I'm not opposed to old maps coming back in new Call of Duty games.

But, I don't think players should have to pay for those maps in DLC expansions.

Instead, I wish Sledgehammer Games were bringing us something new and fresh.

I mean, if we're going to pay $50, we might as well get some new content that truly is new.

Not simply reused maps from previous Call of Duty games.

I understand that the layouts of Carentan and Occupation were fan-favorites.

But, I think players should get those maps for free.

I think we should only have to pay for maps that truly are new maps.

Also, let's talk about new weapons in the "Resistance" DLC.

To my knowledge, there are no new weapons coming in the DLC (in multiplayer).

Sledgehammer Games may choose to bring new weapons due to there being so few weapons in the base game.

However, we'll just have to wait and see.

Also, we're not really sure if there will be any new playable factions added in the DLC content.

My guess would be that there will likely be some sort of civilian faction in the "Resistance" DLC.

But, other than that, we don't really know of any others.

Now guys, my honest opinion is that the Season Pass is NOT worth the price.

Yes, I understand that video games cost money to develop.

But honestly, I think Activision and Sledgehammer Games

are charging players way more money than the DLC's are worth.

However, as I said earlier, if you're a hardcore Call of Duty fan,

and you expect to be playing WW2 for months to come,

then getting the Season Pass may be worth it.

However, if you're not a hardcore Call of Duty fan, and you're just looking for a great gameplay experience,

then I would say that the Pass is not worth buying.

But, that's just my opinion.

Guys, I hope you found this video to be helpful.

If so, feel free to SUBSCRIBE, and check out the other videos in our WORTH IT? playlist.

Thanks for watching, guys!

Until next time.

For more infomation >> Call of Duty WW2 Season Pass | WORTH IT? - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP COMMITTED 'IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES' AND IT'S 'APPROPRIATE' TO MONITOR, DEMOCRAT SAYS - Duration: 2:55.

Trump committed impeachable offenses and IES appropriate to monitor Democrat says many lawmakers believe

Impeachment charges may be warranted for president Donald Trump

But continues to hold off on a full-fledged effort to get him out of office

I think there are a lot of us myself included who believe that Donald Trump has committed impeachable offenses

Democratic Representative, John Yarmuth of Kentucky said on

MSNBC's, and T P Daily Show Wednesday, but that doesn't mean that impeachment is a reasonable thing to pursue

Yarmuth elaborated with the same reason that other Democrats have given in the pursuit of impeaching Trump

We're not in the majority so we are not going to get passed in the house it takes two-thirds in the Senate

He said we'd never get close if we got an impeachment resolution passed so it would just be a waste of time

But Yarmuth added it is appropriate to keep conversations going on potentially impeaching Trump

Yarmuth was among six House Democrats who introduced several articles of impeachment against Trump in mid-november

their resolution which failed to pass stated that Trump was guilty of obstruction of justice for firing FBI director James Comey

That he violated the Constitution by accepting profit from foreign governments

and the US for his enterprises undermining the judiciary s independence and

Threatening press freedom the Democrat from the red state joined the impeachment efforts after Trump in October criticized an NBC news report that

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had called him a moron in the nuclear arsenal

Discussion and warned he would challenge news and network licenses

With all of the fake news coming out of NBC and the networks at what point is it appropriate to challenge their license

bad for country Trump tweeted

Yarmuth called that an impeachable offense to use government to censor media

So I wanted to go on the record saying he's committed an impeachable offense. He said

Yarmuth on Wednesday said he agreed with

Democratic leaders of the party s focus at the moment should not be on the uphill battle to impeach Trump

But on making gains for American citizens right now

We have a huge energy advantage and our voters are telling us every day our base is saying go after him

Impeach him please do but that's not going to help us win back control of the house

He said we should be running on how we can make American lives better for the people other pushes to impeach Trump

including one by Democratic Representative, Al Green of Texas

Also have fallen flat the likelihood of Trump facing impeachment could rise if Democrats win back the house next year

representative Gerald Kneedler who won this spot on the House Judiciary Committee vacated by representative John Conyers

Campaigned on the claim that his decades of experience in constitutional law made him the most qualified lawmaker to hold the trump

administration accountable for its destructive policies and unprecedented misconduct

For more infomation >> TRUMP COMMITTED 'IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES' AND IT'S 'APPROPRIATE' TO MONITOR, DEMOCRAT SAYS - Duration: 2:55.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP COMMITTED 'IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES' AND IT'S 'APPROPRIATE' TO MONITOR, DEMOCRAT SAYS - Duration: 2:55.