It was anarchy back to back earthquakes rock Anchorage US news
The earthquakes, measuring 7.0 and 5.8, briefly triggered a tsunami warning but no deaths or injuries have been reported
The earthquakes, measuring 7.0 and 5.8, briefly triggered a tsunami warning but no deaths or injuries have been reported
Back-to-back earthquakes measuring 7.0 and 5.8 rocked buildings and shattered roads in Anchorage on Friday, sending people running into the streets and briefly triggering a warning to residents in Kodiak to flee to higher ground for fear of a tsunami.
The warning was lifted a short time later. There were no immediate reports of any deaths or serious injuries.
The US Geological Survey said the first and more powerful quake was centered about 7 miles (12km) north of Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, with a population of about 300,000. People ran from their offices or took cover under desks.
Cracks could be seen in a two-story downtown Anchorage building, and photographs posted to social media showed fractured roads and collapsed ceiling tiles at an Anchorage high school. One image showed a car stranded on an island of pavement, surrounded by cavernous cracks where the earthquake split the road.
Cereal boxes and packages of batteries littered the floor of a grocery store, and picture frames and mirrors were knocked from living room walls.
People went back inside after the first earthquake struck, but the 5.8 aftershock about five minutes later sent them running back into the streets.
A tsunami warning was issued for the southern Alaska coastal areas of Cook's Inlet and part of the Kenai peninsula. Police on Kodiak Island warned people in the city of 6,100 to "evacuate to higher ground immediately" because of "wave estimated 10 minutes".
In Kenai, north of Anchorage, Brandon Slaton was alone at home and soaking in the bathtub when the earthquake struck. Slaton, who weighs 209lbs, said it created a powerful bath-and-forth sloshing in the bath, and before he knew it, he was thrown out of the tub by the waves.
His 120lb mastiff panicked and tried to run down the stairs, but the house was swaying so much that the dog was thrown off its feet and into a wall and tumbled down the stairs, Slaton said.
Slaton ran into his son's room after the shaking stopped and found his fish tank shattered and the fish on the floor. He grabbed it and put it in another bowl.
"It was anarchy," he said. "There's no pictures left on the walls, there's no power, there's no fish tank left. Everything that's not tied down is broke."
Alaska averages 40,000 earthquakes per year, with more large quakes than the 49 other states combined. Southern Alaska has a high risk of earthquakes because of tectonic plates sliding past each other under the region.
David Harper was getting coffee at a store when the low rumble began and intensified into something that sounded "like the building was just going to fall apart". Harper ran to the exit with other patrons.
"The main thought that was going through my head as I was trying to get out the door was, 'I want this to stop,'" he said. Harper said the quake was "significant enough that the people who were outside were actively hugging each other. You could tell that it was a bad one."
On 27 March 1964, Alaska was hit by a magnitude 9.2 earthquake, the strongest recorded in US history, centered about 75 miles east of Anchorage. The quake lasted about four and a half minutes, and the tsunami it triggered claimed about 130 lives.
For more infomation >> It was anarchy back to back earthquakes rock Anchorage US news - Duration: 3:15.-------------------------------------------
US NAVAL ACADEMY Q&A FT. VICTOR WANG - Duration: 6:35.
How much was this? Enough. Why? It only cost $15 guys.
Why you tryna expose me?
What's up guys welcome back to my channel. As you can see I got this man
over here, Victor Wang, from the Naval Academy. We're gonna do a Q&A with him. If you
don't remember, he was in my original video of 1v1 versus Naval Academy
Midshipman. If you probably saw that video, I let him win the 1v1 just because
you know.... I just needed him to feel good
about himself you know after he got beat down from plebe summer you know he
had to feel good anyways. As you guys know, Victor goes to Naval Academy
and he doesn't really have many opportunities to kind of get these kind
of Q&A sessions going so I thought you know why not do a Q&A in my house during
Thanksgiving Day. In one of my other videos you guys gave a bunch of
questions that you want to ask Victor, so I have them on a sheet of paper
right here, so without further ado, I want to first say, Victor can you
give a brief description of yourself in case there any ladies out there who want
to hit you up you know Yeah I'm a BCA 2017
graduate we're the same graduating class that's how we know each other. I didn't
get into Naval Academy on my first time, I applied twice, so I went to
University of Illinois in Urbana Champaign for a year and then I transferred to Naval
Academy. Yeah kind of my story. So let's start with the first question, when
is Nick Gee getting his $37.00 back? I already gave it to him, I gave him rides, the rides
covers up for that so never I guess. My next question comes from my sister, why
did you choose the Navy and why not the Army, the Marines, the Air Force.
It just had a lot more options coming out so coming in you can service like a lot
more things for example to I got submarines, you can service
Warfare Officer, you can be a Marine Corps officer, Navy pilot, seal, yoD, med
Corps. It's just that in the army you don't really have many options
air force you don't really have many options as well. Ash Jindal asked
this question he's my great grandbig in Theta Tau. He wants to know who would
win in a game of musical chairs, a team of blind people or a team of deaf people
A team of deaf people cuz the blind people wouldn't know where to go, they'd just like
keep on walking, they wouldn't know where to sit
well they'd know when the music stopped. yeah but then the deaf people would realize that the
blind people knew that and then the Deaf people would react
via how the blind people react that's true that's true. I'd rather be deaf than
blind in real life. So this comes from Andrew Zheng, man scale Tony Wu. ten men yes
oh man ten minute he's a snack. Sam asks
how do you get a friend like tony. Who said we're friends? Yeah I just like I just found
him off the street actually and he just happened to go the Naval Academy. Sanjana Rao
wants to know what is your first memory of me. I thought you were a loser. I think I told you cuz
in basketball camp remember yeah and then were trying to show up
and everything and show off. like nothing's changed I guess
but it's like there's more to this more to you than I thought. I think
you're looking at someone else like it was some other dude because I
actually made my jumpshots.
are you aware of the subtle Asian traits page and what do you think of it? I am I
think it's a really funny really relatable takes up a lot of my time.
Ok so now I'll go into some of the navy questions now. We're gonna start with how is the food
at the Naval Academy? A lot of people there complain about it, but it's honestly not
that bad I mean we get hot food every single day and three meals a day and a
lot of people don't get that in this world. And even compared to like regular college
food like it's not that bad. How does it compare to Johns Hopkins food?
So much better at least during the day I went. You definitely didn't come during Sterling Brunch.
Sterling brunch is once a month and it's basically when we get really
bougie and we start giving out salmon shrimp we have like ice sculptures and
stuff. It's just a time you know. What classes are you taking and what do you
learn at the Naval Academy. Right now the classes I'm taking are Calc 3
chem 2, naval history, boxing, cyber security, English, that's it. I take 18 or
17 credits. 18 is average. Yeah you see like I'm trying to I'm trying to like
get through Hopkins taking 15 credits or less every semester so like 18 just
sounds incredibly insane and combine that with like the 5 a.m. workouts and
then...yeah it's a lot of stuff. What's
the worst military obligation you have to do so far? Parades
Nobody likes parades, like you'll find them online if you look up
USNA parade. You'll find it it's like an hour and a half long, it's mandatory
nobody likes them at all. It's really boring. Especially this summer it's bad because
I you have to wear FTV's, it's like your parade uniform. First of all, it's really
really uncomfortable and then it's also kind of thick too and sometimes you'll
be standing out there in like 105 degree weather people will pass out because it
get super duper hot. Those are the worst nobody likes them. What are your plans
after graduation. I want a service like submarines so I'll be a submarine
officer and then you can go to power school first around like two years then
you're an officer aboard submarines. Apple or Android? Windows or
Mac? Ok, fortnite or pubG?
What is your
mile time now and what was it before going to Naval Academy.
My 1.5 mile time is about 9:45 so I guess that's a 6:30 per mile pace so I'm
assuming I can run a mile under 6:30 Before going to Naval,
my personal record was a 6:38.
So that's all the questions I have for Victor today I hope you guys enjoyed
this video I hope you guys gain some insight on the Naval Academy life and
just on the thoughts that goes on in this man's head but until next time we
out
-------------------------------------------
Tariff tensions shadow US, Canada, Mexico trade pact signing - Duration: 2:06.
For more infomation >> Tariff tensions shadow US, Canada, Mexico trade pact signing - Duration: 2:06. -------------------------------------------
THEY CANNOT KILL US OFF. - Duration: 6:51.
For more infomation >> THEY CANNOT KILL US OFF. - Duration: 6:51. -------------------------------------------
December PV Promo (US only) - Duration: 1:54.
- We're helping you focus on the joy of the season
with a bundle of holiday surprises
in this month's PV promo.
Gather the ones you love with these joyful products
to feel the warmth of the season.
Place a 100 PV Essential Rewards order
and you'll receive a free 5-milliliter bottle
of Lemongrass Vitality.
The light, bright flavor will warm up a cup
of herbal tea and support your overall wellness.
When you place a 190 PV order, you'll get
a 5 milliliter of Joy essential oil blend.
Use this comforting combination of citrus and
floral scents to welcome loved ones to your home.
When you order with Essential Rewards,
you'll also get a 15-milliliter bottle of Pine,
the freshest way to make your home feel like the holidays.
With a 250 PV order you'll receive
a 5-milliliter bottle of White Angelica.
This complex blend has a harmonizing scent
that you can diffuse when family comes to visit.
When you make a 300 PV order,
we'll send you a 5-milliliter bottle of Gathering.
When the chaotic energy of the holidays tries to intrude,
diffuse this warm blend to help keep calm.
Make a qualifying 400 PV order,
and you'll receive a 15-milliliter bottle of Frankincense.
With a sacred history, and an aroma that
elevates spiritual practice, this oil makes
a great gift for the enlightened ones on your nice list.
We'll also send you a copy of D. Gary Young:
The World Leader in Essential Oils.
This powerful book written by Young Living
co-founder and CEO, Mary Young,
gives an expansive overview of the life, passions,
and achievements of our founder.
We hope it inspires you to share some of your favorite
Young Living tales with family and friends.
To learn more about this promotion,
and to place your qualifying order, visit YoungLiving.com.
[Young Living Essential Oils]
-------------------------------------------
30% Off the Ever Us Two-Stone Diamond Collection at KAY - Duration: 0:16.
Being in love is an amazing thing,
being in love with your best friend is everything.
This is Ever Us.
One diamond for your best friend, one for your true love.
Now 30% off at Kay.
♪
-------------------------------------------
Trump signs trade pact with Canada and Mexico to replace Nafta US news - Duration: 3:20.
Trump signs trade pact with Canada and Mexico to replace Nafta US news
Each country's legislature must also approve the agreement but Democrats in the US are already demanding changes
Each country's legislature must also approve the agreement but Democrats in the US are already demanding changes
Donald Trump and the leaders of Canada and Mexico signed a revised North American trade pact, a deal that fulfills a key political pledge by the US president but faces an uncertain future in the US Congress.
The celebratory moment was dimmed by ongoing differences over Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs, as well as plans for massive layoffs in the US and Canada by General Motors.
The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is meant to replace the 24-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta), which Trump has long denigrated as a "disaster".
But while Trump has hailed the new agreement as a radical rewrite of the "worst trade deal ever made", Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau pointedly referred to the deal as the "new North American Free Trade Agreement".
Trump appeared with Trudeau and outgoing Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto at the G20 summit in Buenos Aires for the formal signing ceremony. Each country's legislature must also approve the agreement.
"It's been long and hard. We've taken a lot of barbs and a little abuse and we got there," Trump said of the pact. "It's great for all our countries."
Legislative approval is the next step in the process, but could prove to be a difficult task in the US, especially now that Democrats – instead of Trump's Republicans – will control the House of Representatives come January. Democrats and their allies in the labor movement are already demanding changes to the agreement.
Within hours of the signing, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the deal must have stronger labor and environmental protections in order to get majority support in Congress and "must prove to be a net benefit to middle-class families and working people".
The three countries agreed to the USMCA just hours before a US-imposed 30 September deadline. Many trade analysts say the successor to Nafta isn't all that different from the old one, despite Trump's claim that it would "transform North America back into a manufacturing powerhouse".
While Trump hailed the revised trade pact, Trudeau was more measured and used the event to call on Trump to remove steel and aluminum tariffs the US slapped on Canada and Mexico. Trudeau also referenced recent downsizing moves by GM in North America as a "heavy blow".
"With hard work, good will and determination, I'm confident that we will get there," Trudeau said.
Peña Nieto, who will hand off to his successor Saturday, said he was honored to be at the signing on the final day of his administration, calling it the culmination of a long process "that allow us to overcome differences and to conciliate our visions".
The new agreement requires that 40% of cars eventually be made in countries that pay autoworkers at least $16 an hour – that is, the US and Canada and not Mexico – to qualify for duty-free treatment under the trade pact. It also requires Mexico to pursue reforms of labor law to encourage independent unions.
-------------------------------------------
Moon, Trump agree next N. Korea-U.S. summit will create momentum for denuclearization - Duration: 2:18.
Now,... onto the South Korean leader's trip to the G20 Summit in Argentina.
President Moon Jae-in and U.S. President Donald Trump held talks Friday on the sidelines of
the summit.
North Korea dominated most of their discussion.
Shin Se-min has this story.
The leaders of South Korea and the United States in tune on North Korea.
Presidents Moon Jae-in and Donald Trump sat down on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in
Argentina on Friday for a frank discussion with just their translators in attendance.
They vowed to align their policies to ensure the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
remains on track.
"President Trump, while affirming his commitment to hold a second North Korea-U.S. summit early
next year,... asked that South Korea and the U.S. maintain close cooperation so the summit
will be another historic milestone in the process of denuclearizing North Korea."
President Moon's chief press secretary explained that President Trump reaffirmed his pledge
to hold a second summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un,... and noted that Kim's
planned reciprocal visit to Seoul may create new momentum in efforts to denuclearize Pyeongyang
and establish peace in the region.
Although the two did not go into details on when Kim might travel to the South,... it's
viewed that Kim's visit would help the ongoing push for peace.
The Blue House official said the question now is on whether the North Korean leader
sticks to his pledge.
On North Korea sanctions,...
Presidents Moon and Trump agreed that keeping the regime under already imposed sanctions
is necessary until the Korean Peninsula is completely denuclearized.
While the two allies share the goal of complete denuclearization,... their approach on how
to achieve it isn't in lockstep.
Seoul has been pushing to improve ties with Pyeongyang through economic engagement,...
while Washington has been pursuing a dual policy of pressure and dialogue which has
caused friction between the North and the U.S.
"The meeting between Presidents Moon and Trump was a chance to reopen the possibility of
Kim Jong-un visiting Seoul by the years' end-- in the hope that it could give the stalled
denuclearization process another push.
Shin Se-min, Arirang News, Buenos Aires."
-------------------------------------------
Places in India which protect us from Modernization | Best places in India | 123 Telugu facts - Duration: 6:04.
Hi Friends Welcome To 123 Telugu Facts.
Electronic Gadgets have become part of our lives.
It is impossible to stay away from these.
If we see some places we forget ourselves.
We forget electric gadgets at that time.
Let us learn about those 10 places in India which give us that feeling.
1 : Bandipur National Park,Karnataka.
It combines 2 National Parks.
It is correct place to search for wild Animals.
If people want to explore forest this place is 1 among them.
There are many animals there like Spot Elephants & so on to see.
2 : Andaman Nicobar Islands.
It is not fare to compare this place with others.
This places fill power in us.
Nature lovers hunger will be fulfilled.
We can see & enjoy these Islands nature beauty.
Andaman Islands Govt are even providing us with many water Games.
There is beauty hidden inside it.
3 : Thar Desert.
We can enjoy Jaisalmer desert colors & long travel in desert on Camel.
This is correct place to switch off mobiles & make our body parts active.
We can even see traditional dances & many more in this Desert which shines like gold.
4 : Ladakh .
Ladakh is a place where we can know about our inner soul & peace if we have spiritual values.
Mathas here are filled with peace & Nature beauty.
Without visiting ladakh our life feels something is missing in it.
We must not miss those Mathas in some places.
5 : Kerala ,Detox Near Back waters.
By sitting on Deck we can enjoy back water's & sea & can also eat sea food.
Rice plantations & coconut trees make us happy.
Kerala is best place to have a Detox holiday.
6 : Rann of Kutch.
Feel darkness once.
It is 1 of important places in India.
It is worlds biggest salt desert.
Rann of Kutch life starts in October.
In remaining months it looks dry.
Tent there give a great feeling.
Rann is 1 of best holiday spots in the world,there are some packages to visit this place.
7 : Thick Western Ghats.
Every 1 wants to be in nature beauty.
Western Ghats belong to UNESCO.
They are famous for wildlife.
It is 1600 km long think forest which make our eyes happy.
It makes us freeze by its beauty & animals.
Rainy season is best to visit this place.
We can see Waterfalls at every edge at that time.
7 : Meghalaya .
We loose our selves by seeing Meghalaya Cave beauties.
There are many famous caves at this place.
This is only of place in India which has vast space.
This place makes us feel magical after seeing that place beauties.
We can never forget tents in that thick forest.
9 : Trek in Sikkim.
The place for people who like Adventure is Sikkim.
It is 1 of the place which India Tourism provides services as a holiday spot.
Trekkers climb Majestic Mountains.
This place gives us a feel like we are in Himalayas in happy short tour .
This is 1 best trekking places.
We feel happy after trekking & enjoy natural beauty.
We must invade Buddhist tradition there.
We must try to eat there traditional foods.
10 : Rishikesh.
We can mental peace if we try yoga.
We must plan before going to Rajaji National Park.
We can enjoy happily.
Subscribe , Click Bell , Like , Share.
-------------------------------------------
New U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations: A Rebalance or a Reshuffle? - Duration: 37:44.
China has an honored place in our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific if it chooses
to respect its neighbors' sovereignty; embrace free, fair, and reciprocal trade; uphold human
rights and freedom.
The American people want nothing more; the Chinese people and the entire Indo-Pacific
deserve nothing less.
Pence lashed out on China again at APEC.
What will the Trump-Xi meeting at the G-20 summit look like?
The simplest prediction is that there will be very little outcome.
Forty-six years ago, the United States severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan for China.
In hindsight, was that a good policy?
There's no question that we ignored and devalued the political progress and political
rights of the people of Taiwan in pursuit of a hopeful or optimistic approach towards
dealing with China.
So do you think the U.S.-Taiwan relationship will undergo fundamental changes under President
Trump?
Yes, I do.
Welcome to Zooming In, this is Simone Gao.
Every new administration rebalances foreign relations to some extent.
U.S.-China relations have been fine-tuned for decades from the Nixon era to the Obama
era.
Now that fine-tuning is disrupted by the Trump administration.
President Trump calls for Americans to wake up from a decades-long wishful thinking about
China.
Will there be a reshuffle of the most important bilateral relationship in the world under
Trump?
How will that affect Taiwan, Communist China's main rival, an extremely important ally of
America and a friend, who felt betrayed but never left?
I discussed these questions with Mr. Stephen Yates, who served as Deputy National Security
Adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney and Idaho Republican Party Chair.
Mr. Yates is the CEO of consulting firm DC International Advisory, and he spent years
of his life in Taiwan.
The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, or APEC, was held in Papua New Guinea over the
weekend.
This year, they didn't reach an agreement because China and the U.S. disagreed with
each other.
This is highly unusual.
1989 was the last time APEC leaders did not work out a group statement.
It is reported that four Chinese officials barged into the office of the host country's
foreign minister uninvited.
They demanded changes in the official communiqué.
The demand was rejected and Chinese officials left voluntarily after security officers were
summoned.
China dismissed the account as "rumors."
Prior to the supposed conflict, Vice President Mike Pence openly criticized China once again.
It comes after he declared an official China policy overhaul last month.
And let me be clear again: China has an honored place in our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific
if it chooses to respect its neighbors' sovereignty; embrace free, fair, and reciprocal
trade; uphold human rights and freedom.
The American people want nothing more; the Chinese people and the entire Indo-Pacific
deserve nothing less.
Chinese President Xi Jinping rebutted Mr. Pence's account by pointing at the U.S.
as the one installing isolationist and protectionist trade policies.
Resorting to old practices such as protectionism and unilateralism will not resolve problems.
On the contrary, they can only add uncertainties to the global economy.
Only openness and cooperation can bring more opportunities and create more space for development.
This is a well proven historical fact.
One who chooses to close his door will only cut himself off from the rest of the world
and lose his direction.
China is the third-largest donor to countries in this region.
The U.S. comes fourth but is catching up.
Mr. Pence announced the United States' pledge to join Australia and Japan in helping to
bring electricity to 70 percent of Papua New Guinea by 2030.
The United States will also partner with Papua New Guinea and Australia on their joint initiative
at Lombrum Naval Base on Manus Island.
This move has strategic importance since the base is big enough to hold large naval vessels
and task groups, according to the New York Times.
So America and China were not on good terms at the APEC meeting.
It almost seemed that Mike Pence went there and disrupted a good show Xi Jinping was trying
to put on, considering Beijing financed roads and a $50 million renovation of a convention
center in the host city.
This APEC summit probably would have served more as a PR instrument to Beijing than anything
else.
The real show is G-20 in December where Trump and Xi will meet.
What will that meeting be like?
Here is my earlier discussion with Mr. Stephen Yates.
U.S.-China relations.
The G-20 is coming up.
What do you think will be the outcome of the Trump-Xi summit?
Well, my experience tells me that expectations should be pretty low.
Usually when leaders get together, they exchange talking points, they have some sense of what
each is seeking, and the simplest prediction is that there will be very little outcome.
And most of our leadership meetings are like that.
Occasionally it's different.
You end up with something like Nixon going to China or having a big fundamental change
in American policy.
I don't think this kind of meeting is a big fundamental change.
President Trump has just gone through a midterm election; President Xi is under what we perceive
to be strong economic and political pressure inside China.
I don't think either leader is looking to make big concessions in this meeting.
That's an important time to have a conversation between the two leaders.
I don't believe that President Trump feels the need or the desire to fundamentally change
his trade policy.
I think he intends to keep very strong pressure on China economically, at least through his
reelection campaign, and maybe even beyond.
These are beliefs about economic policy and the impact that U.S. trade policy has had
on American workers that he has articulated for several decades.
This is part of his political theology almost.
And so I don't expect him to make a significant change and concede.
What I'm hearing from the Chinese side, they send envoys to the United States almost
sounding boastful that they're actually in a strong position, from their point of
view.
And so, so far, on the U.S. side, what I understand, and actually agree with, on the Trump administration
approach on economic policy towards China, I don't see that changing.
And then what I see from China is more of the same theater of saying we're strong,
we are displacing the United States as the economic leader of the world, you are becoming
isolationist because of your protectionist policies.
And we have two leaders talking past each other.
That's what I think the G20 meeting is likely to be like.
That President Trump will restate his priorities.
He will speak in terms that say he's open to a deal, but it's a deal that President
Xi is not prepared to accept in my estimation right now.
And so the back-and-forth attentions, the on-again, off-again negotiations are likely
to go on for at least the next two years.
Then what's the purpose of this meeting after all.
I mean It is speculated that Xi Jinping initiated the request to meet, right?
Yeah.
Well, it is part of a pattern that, when major leaders go to these multilateral gatherings,
and we know President Trump doesn't like multilateral gatherings, that they'll have
bilateral meetings with key counterparts.
Even to American stakeholders, say, like investors in Wall Street and farmers and manufacturers
around the United States, they're feeling some of the effects of the trade tension.
And so it's reassuring to them to see our leader engage the Chinese leader even if they're
not making concessions or accommodations or reaching a new deal.
If there was no conversation going on, that could create a degree of uncertainty among
some of these economic and political actors that would be a problem for U.S. politics
and U.S. policy.
And so even though this is somewhat theater, I think that that theater has an important
impact on some key American stakeholders.
I expect that President Xi Jinping has similar needs inside China to be seen engaging the
U.S. president even if there isn't a clear, definable outcome to come home and say this
is what I got from the meeting.
So that's what I assume the purpose of this meeting is.
But I would put it at extremely low chances of a significant policy development coming
out of the meeting, even if something is announced, it's probably a symbolic announcement more
than a major breakthrough or change in the economic relationship.
But the difference between the U.S. and China is, China cannot afford a prolonged trade
war, the U.S. can.
I believe that to be true.
But as unimportant as I am, I believe that President Trump believes that to be true.
And, while there are many analytical fights among China experts and economic experts about
who's winning, who's losing, who's facing what kinds of risks and pressures in this,
the dominant analysis that the President of the United States accepts is that there's
more pressure on China, it's having a more negative effect on China's economy than
on the American economy, and there are large numbers of American voters and workers who
feel like decades of U.S. policy towards China has unfairly disadvantaged them.
So even if they're paying a price in the short term, a lot of them say that they're
willing to accept that price if it results in a rebalancing of the U.S.-China economic
relationship towards something more normal, more fair, more reciprocal.
And those are the words that the Trump administration has been using.
And those are ideals that a large number of Americans would agree with.
The key test is do we go through this period of risk and tension and get better results.
And so far, it's too soon to say.
But I support the direction the policy is going.
I don't think the president is going to change it.
And when the president looks at his 2020 reelection campaign, those states that are very key for
him to keep in his coalition to get reelected are the states where labor movements and other
activist groups were very critical of NAFTA and of U.S.-China trade.
And so what he's done on trade negotiations so far is very much aimed at those geographies,
and I think he has to keep consistent with his policies.
So that makes me wonder what Xi Jinping's thinking is even more.
If President Trump won't make concessions and China can't afford a prolonged trade
war.
What is he going to do?
Well, I would say, somewhat candidly, I don't care what he does because it's his job to
figure that out.
The biggest obstacle, though, for American policy, and I think for the benefit of the
Chinese people, is how effective are we in helping the Chinese people know the truth
about the economic impact this has?
Because the Communist party still has near total control on information.
They can make up their own statistics; they can make up their own leadership statements;
and they can say that they are doing better off than they are.
And there could be a large number of Chinese people that think, well, maybe I'm the only
one feeling this pain.
Or my village is the only one feeling this pain, but the rest of China is doing okay.
And out of a sense of patriotism, they're willing to sacrifice in their own small universe
if bigger China is doing better.
And that kind of propaganda has protected Communist Party leaders for a very, very long
time.
So I do believe that the Chinese economy has faced some difficulties.
Even just in stock markets we can measure what the cost of recent changes has been.
But the key challenge is do a large number of Chinese people see that this is a broader
problem, not just a narrow one for them and where they live and that their leaders are
perhaps not giving them the whole truth.
And only then would the Chinese people be prepared to be able to put pressure on their
own leaders to make adjustments that clearly the Communist Party leadership has not wanted
to make.
Coming up: Has the U.S. started a new cold war with China?
But I come before you today because the American people deserve to know that, as we speak,
Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic, and military
tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the
United States.
China is also applying this power in more proactive ways than ever before, to exert
influence and interfere in the domestic policy and politics of this country.
Under President Trump's leadership, the United States has taken decisive action to
respond to China with American action, applying the principles and the policies long advocated
in these halls….
That was a scorching speech made by Vice President Pence on China about a month ago.
Is it a declaration of a new cold war?
This is what Stephen Yates has to say.
Talking about Vice President Pence's speech, people say that seems like a declaration of
a new cold war with China.
What's your opinion?
Well, I served in the White House when 9/11 happened and the so-called "war on terror"
began.
And one way that was talked about that resonated with me was that we didn't declare war on
the terrorists, the terrorists had declared war on us.
And it took until 9/11 for us to decide that we were going to systematically respond.
And that's how I think about the China challenge.
We are not declaring a cold war on China; China has engaged in a cold war against us
for a very long time.
Since when?
Well, maybe since the founding of the Communist Party.
And maybe that never stopped.
And at the very least, going through even the reform and opening period of Deng Xiaoping,
there were many things that are, to put it in President Trump parlance, China-first policies
that were nationalist, aggressively seeking advantage, and there isn't necessarily something
inherently wrong with that.
There's something inherently wrong with failing to recognize that that's what they're
doing and meeting the challenge.
And so when you look from the 1990s, especially forward, when we started to have campaign
finance scandals of Chinese business people and others trying to buy influence in our
political system, all the way through recent decades, where you have Chinese business people
going into companies and conspicuously being able to walk away with financial or technological
intellectual property to the point where there's competition or crippling of those companies,
we're just at a fundamentally different place now than we were.
And it's my estimation that it's been a part of a very systematic and cognizant
policy of the Communist Party to engage America in this way and basically benefit from our
strengths with the hope of bringing some of those strengths to China, which seems fair
enough, but at the same time to find ways to cripple us from within.
And that's the part which I think people are just beginning to talk about and have
more of an awareness of.
In my experience, there have been many Democrats who have had these kind of concerns.
I remember in the 1990s engaging in China policy debates with committees in Congress
and members of Congress, and there were Democrats that were very vocal about their concerns
on these ideas.
And so we're at the beginning of a conversation of -- not just what an American response would
be – in the Trump administration, in the new Congress, but also in Europe and in broader
parts of Asia about how do we organize and strengthen relatively free societies against
this kind of aggression.
And it's not an easy question to answer.
So I think that cold war was declared by China in engaging in these policies, and we're
just now beginning to talk about how to respond, which is not the same thing as actually responding.
So you are essentially saying the United States did not start a new cold war with China.
The Chinese Communist Regime has been in a cold war with the U.S. ever since they took
power.
And only now the United States starts to realize it and respond to it.
Right.
The fundamental assumption of the Nixon-Kissinger compromise with the People's Republic of
China was that the United States could look past the absolute brutality of the Great Proletarian
Cultural Revolution and look past the very obvious self-inflicted poverty that the and
other terrible policies of the Communist Party had imposed upon China.
We could Great Leap Forward ignore these weaknesses and flaws because the value of having China
balance against the Soviet Union in some fashion in the Cold War competition exceeded what
benefit we thought we could get by confronting these truths about where China was.
So we allowed ourselves to suspend disbelief about the nature and health of the Chinese
system in order to have geopolitical advantage in the world against the Soviet Union.
By the time the competition with the Soviet Union fundamentally changed, we were so accustomed
to this suspension of disbelief that we just continue with these assumptions.
And then the assumption becomes, well, if we just allow China to become more well off
and more integrated with the world, that that improvement in standards of living, in integration
into the international system, will change the nature of the policy of the Communist
Party of China.
And it will be communist only in name only, and the nature of the government and the party
will be one where our differences will become fewer, and areas of cooperation will expand.
And we can normalize what China is like and what the relationship between the U.S. and
China is.
That's been the theory.
And it's been the dominant theory in our universities and in our government and in
Republican and Democrat administrations.
We're just at the first time that someone's been willing, in a leadership level, to say
I don't believe that anymore and to start taking a different approach to how to negotiate
with a country that doesn't resemble this image that has been accepted for far too long.
So I think it's actually a very historic and important moment for us.
It's unclear whether we will stick to this different approach or whether we have pressures
in Congress and in the reelection campaign and, if some other leader is elected, will
they continue some elements of the Trump approach towards China?
Or will they go back to the mainstream, more accommodating view.
And that is something that only two or three more election cycles can answer.
Coming up: Will there be a fundamental change in the U.S.-Taiwan relationship under President
Trump?
At the APEC meeting, U.S. Vice President Mike Pence met with Morris Chang, who is leading
Taiwan's delegation at the summit.
APEC is the only major regional forum that includes Taiwan as a member.
However, Taiwan has never been able to be represented by its president at the annual
gathering due to opposition by China.
According to Taiwanese media, the Pence-Chang meeting is the highest level interaction between
the United States and Taiwan at the APEC summit.
Meanwhile, Pence did not have a sit-down meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
This is probably another blow to Xi Jinping at the APEC meeting since Beijing is super
sensitive as to who is meeting the Taiwanese on the international stage.
The Pence-Chang meeting is everywhere in Taiwanese media.
But does Taiwan feel truly secure with this administration?
Forty-six years ago, the U.S. severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan for China.
That left Taiwanese people feeling that Taiwan is just a piece of commodity at U.S. disposal.
It can be sold for a bigger profit at any time.
Do you think that will be the case with this administration?
Well, I get this question all the time in Taiwan.
There's a massive anxiety about being treated like a bargaining chip.
And no one wants to feel like they're just that simple chip.
They are a nation, a proud people, a democracy, significant economy, very well educated, integrated
with the world in many, many ways, and they want to be treated with respect, dignity,
and all those other things that people naturally want.
So they're doing everything that is – that they're supposed to, and yet still feel
at risk of being sold out.
And so that anxiety is very, very real and pronounced in Taiwan.
And, unfortunately, Taiwan has, in fact, been used as a bargaining chip.
The people of Taiwan had no vote over whether they should stay in the U.N. or, as Chiang
Kai-shek's government decided out of protest, to withdraw from the U.N. when the PRC finally
won the general assembly votes to enter in.
They didn't have a say in whether to advocate a one China, one Taiwan policy, which the
United States was probably prepared to accept in the early 1970s.
They instead were governed by a dictator that said no, there is a "one China" policy,
and the Republic of China is that one China, and we will not concede, and we will retake
the motherland.
That was, of course, crazy talk.
But the people of Taiwan have been sold out in a number of different ways.
More establishment or traditional foreign policy experts have come up with nice phrases
to try to make this sound okay, but there's no question that we ignored and devalued the
political progress and political rights of the people of Taiwan in pursuit of a hopeful
or optimistic approach towards dealing with China.
And so I am much more critical of the approach that has been taken, much more critical of
what I see as establishment foreign policy thinking on this, and the people of Taiwan
are not wrong to have that anxiety.
It is clearly possible that this administration or any administration could reach yet another
deal with China that would be to Taiwan's disadvantage.
That's possible.
I don't think it's as likely just because President Trump thinks differently than most
American presidents ever do.
And he – there's some debate about what it means to be a nationalist, but one thing
for sure is, if he's making unnecessary accommodations on Taiwan to try to get a deal
with China, that's weakness.
And President Trump hates to appear weak.
And so there are some elements of his natural approach to policy that should be reassuring,
that he's not someone that is going to be happy with or rush into making unnecessary
concessions.
And I think a lot of the concessions that American policymakers have given on cross-strait
issues or dealing with Taiwan generally, have been out of unnecessary weakness on the American
side.
So this whole idea that we can't allow leaders of Taiwan to freely visit the United States,
it's a profoundly un-American policy.
It's also one that we have not followed consistently with other countries with whom
we don't have diplomatic relations.
And Taiwan now is the only democratic society on the planet that we don't allow leaders
to come freely to our country and engage our people.
So I don't think that President Trump is as likely to be susceptible to that temptation
to make those concessions as other leaders have.
He's not interested in new world wars, major power conflicts.
One of the reasons he built a coalition to get elected president was to pull back somewhat
from a perceived overextension of American engagement in conflicts.
He was critic of the war in Iraq and somewhat a critic of the war in Afghanistan, which
still goes on.
And so he would be susceptible to the notion that, well, if you engage in these policies,
it increases the risk of conflict, but I think that to his core he believes in peace through
strength and that the best deterrence against some kind of a conflict with China is the
reality, but at the very least, a perception that he's just crazy enough to fight and
that America is stronger than it's ever been.
And that, I think, is the narrative that he would like to go into negotiations with.
And until that changes, Taiwan is relatively in a safe space in terms of being a victim
or a bargaining chip in that kind of back and forth.
But the great game for President Trump very much focuses on rebalancing, recalibrating
the U.S.-China relationship on security, economic, and other areas.
And if that rebalancing occurs, I think he genuinely is open to a businesslike, friendly
relationship with China, not necessarily the Communist Party, but with China and the Chinese
people.
So it's not an anti-China policy.
And I think he believes that.
So whether I'm wrong in my faith and the Taiwan people are right about their anxiety,
we'll have to see.
But for now, I think it's very low risk of the American position towards Taiwan getting
weaker.
I think there's a very high likelihood of it getting stronger.
And you think this is an opportunity for Taiwan.
It is.
You know, I have some sympathy for the people of Taiwan.
I spent a lot – a part of my life coming and going to Taiwan.
These are people who endured many decades of colonization and a dictatorship, martial
law, and then through all of that, even with diplomatic isolation, still emerged with a
very competitive vibrant democracy, successful economy, a good, well-meaning people who seem
to have world-class food that is there to welcome any guest at any time.
Clear, positive value to add to the world and its neighbors.
And so I think it's incredibly important to not just do them a favor, but honor our
own values by making sure that we're not imposing pain and restrictions on people who
have chosen this good path in so many other ways.
I also think it's a very important example to all Chinese people that they at some point
in their own way, if the people in Taiwan can outlive a Leninist dictatorship and martial
law and organize themselves to make their national leaders have to submit to their will,
well then the people in Jiangsu province can too.
Guangdong province can too.
And other areas of China can too, and should.
And so to me that's the other reason to make sure that the U.S. leadership and our
policy reflects the value of what has happened in Taiwan.
Have they?
This is what I'm going to ask you.
Has the U.S. leadership reevaluated their Taiwan policies, especially the one from 46
years ago and see if that was a good decision after all?
There has not been a systemic questioning or review of that, at least to my satisfaction.
And there are a handful or more other experts on China that are around Washington and around
the United States that have been in and out of government the way I have.
And we all basically see a significant weakness in the concessions made from the Nixon-Kissinger
consensus to the present.
And we have felt the power of the criticisms of the Communist Party against what we do
in our careers, against our ability to travel freely, and from the business community in
the United States feeling as though it has to accommodate the Communist Party's point
of view if they want their businesses to be able to enjoy the benefits of this rapidly
growing economy over the last several decades.
And so we are a minority view.
But I think that President Trump is the first opportunity to have a president that is open
to practicing true realism.
And true realism means seeing power and weakness for what it is.
And if you truly believe in advancing your national interests and are engaged in a global
competition to try to create as much advantage for your own people as you can – and I think
that's what President Trump's policy is fundamentally – then we have an opportunity
to break away from some elements of that.
But you will know that that policy has finally been subjected to review when we stop using
the words "one China."
Because the words "one China" is a form of communist manipulation and control.
If they're able to control the words that we use for our own policy, a policy that makes
no sense in the English language, then they're able to control our thoughts and our options
and our actions.
And for 50 years the Communist Party of China has been able to control American leaders'
thoughts, options, and actions with regard to dealing with China.
And President Trump has not escaped that entirely, but he's the first American leader in a
generation plus to show some signs of looking in that direction and trying.
And so whether it was President Trump or any other elected leader of the United States
that proves an openness and a willingness to do that, I want to support that.
So do you think the U.S. Taiwan relationship will undergo fundamental changes under the
Trump administration?
I do.
I think there's elements of that relationship that will become more normalized, whether
there is a formal diplomatic recognition is an interesting question.
I think that is possible, but perhaps unlikely.
But much more normalization of the defense relationship with Taiwan.
Fundamentally, the Trump administration seems to believe that allies and security partners
that have more independent deterrent capability of their own is a greater and more effective
challenge to Chinese aggression.
And so whether it's Japan, Taiwan, other partners having greater independent deterrent
capability is seen as positive.
And that will feed into more of a normalized defense or security relationship with Taiwan,
I believe.
And you hear words along these lines coming from the current defense department.
It could, and it should, lead to more normalized trade and investment relations.
For far too long we've sort of said, well, we can't have a bilateral investment treaty
with Taiwan because the word "treaty" implies statehood, and these are the verbal
games that the "one China" policy has been able to control the thoughts, minds,
and options of American decision-makers.
When they sort of sober up and wake up and they realize, oh, we can engage in a legal
agreement with whatever entity we want to, and China has no control over that, then we
can say, you know what, there's opportunity for America and opportunity for Taiwan to
engage in a new trade and investment relationship.
And if we set high standards in that, it will help America's negotiations with other partners
in Asia and elsewhere.
And so there's an opportunity there.
But it will take two to tango, as they say.
It'll take some innovation and boldness on the Taiwan leadership's part, and it
will take a willingness and an openness from the U.S. government.
I think that the most important parts of the U.S. government are open to this now.
So really it's – the opportunity is there, and when Taiwan emerges from its political
competition at home, maybe there will be some proposals that will be evidence of this trend
being manifest.
November 24th, 2018, is the election day of the 9 in 1 elections in Taiwan.
Taiwanese people will elect almost every level of their local government.
It will be a democratic display for the world as well.
Just as Mr. Yates said, decades of colonization, dictatorship, martial law, with diplomatic
isolation up until now, have not deterred the pursuit of democracy in Taiwan.
Taiwan is a touchstone for whether the Chinese people are capable of democracy after all.
And that judgement is as essential to the Mainland Chinese people as it is to the Americans
and the entire Western world.
Thanks for watching Zooming In, I am Simone Gao.
See you next time.
-------------------------------------------
How Surge Pricing and the Uber Marketplace Work | What Moves Us | Uber - Duration: 2:32.
(music)
- Hi, I'm Katherine Gorman, and I'm here today
with Arundhati Singh and Kristin Kaiser.
I feel like everyone had the same idea
to come to the beach today, and it's gonna be
really pricey to get home now.
- Yeah, with a crowd like this, surge pricing is probably
in effect, prices are gonna be higher than normal.
- But nobody's a fan of surge pricing.
It sort of feels like you're getting taken advantage of.
- I know it may feel that way, but in actuality,
Surge was created to ensure that we deliver reliability.
Surge actually only kicks in when the number
of riders looking to get home exceeds the number
of drivers available, and what Uber tries
to do in real time is to correct
that imbalance by raising the price.
For drivers, the higher price actually attracts more of them
into the area to meet that rider demand.
And as more drivers start to come into the area
to meet that demand, surge pricing will start to come down.
- And riders have choices in these scenarios, too.
They can wait for drivers to become available,
our prices update every few minutes,
or they can share a ride with Uber Pool for a lower price.
- So do you guys want to wait it out
and go get a cup of coffee?
- Yeah, I think that sounds like a great idea.
- Let's do it.
(music)
- I think the fundamental question here is,
if you know when big events are gonna happen
or when you're gonna have a lot of demand,
why not send drivers to where they need to be ahead of time?
- So drivers don't want to be sitting around not earning.
But there are things that we can do
to deliver that reliability.
Something we're working on right now is driver promotions.
These help drivers plan ahead to drive during busy times
and areas to prevent marketplace imbalance.
- But how do promotions for drivers
help Uber be more reliable?
- Driver promotions are offered in advance
to help drivers plan to drive
in those busy times and places.
For example, we have Consecutive Trips, and we have Quest.
With Consecutive Trips, drivers earn extra
for driving in those really busy times and areas.
- And with Quest, drivers earn extra
for completing multiple trips over several days.
The hope is that by carefully offering these promotions,
we can encourage more drivers to get
on the road to drive during busy times
and in busy areas to meet that demand.
- Got it, so the main focus is trying
to bring balance to the marketplace.
- Yeah, absolutely, and that's why we are
constantly building new tools to bring
that reliability to our riders and drivers.
- Supporting a healthy marketplace
for riders and drivers, that's what moves us.
(music)
-------------------------------------------
US stocks jump ahead of US-China trade talks - Duration: 2:10.
For more infomation >> US stocks jump ahead of US-China trade talks - Duration: 2:10. -------------------------------------------
Sarah Sanders blames Mueller for 'undermining' U.S.-Russian relations - Daily News - Duration: 4:50.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders slammed special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation for undermining U
S.-Russian relations but claimed President Trump nixed his meeting with Vladimir Putin over Ukraine
She made the notable attack on the special counsel amid speculation that the president pulled out of his planned meeting with Putin in part due to blowback from the stunning guilty plea by his former lawyer Michael Cohen to an additional charge
Trump announced that the meeting was off just an hour after he said Thursday it was a good time to meet with Putin at the G20 summit in Argentina
Sanders made the accusation against federal investigators in a statement in following reports that Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Putin and Trump would have an informal conversation while they are both in Argentina
'The Russian Witch Hunt Hoax, which is hopefully now nearing an end, is doing very well
Unfortunately, it probably does undermine our relationship with Russia. However, the reason for our canceled meeting is Ukraine
Hopefully, that will be resolved soon so that productive conversations can begin,' Sanders said
'Witch hunt' is the term the president routinely uses to denigrate Mueller's investigation into Russia's role in the 2016 campaign and whether or not there was coordination with Trump's campaign, which the president has repeatedly denied
Sanders doubled down on the White House assertion it was Russia's seizure of three Ukrainian vessels, which provoked international outrage – and not the bad optics of Trump meeting with the Russian president in the wake of Cohen's guilty plea
The president faced blowback after his one-on-one meeting with Putin in Helsinki this past summer, where he declined to forcefully confront the leader and even explained Putin's denial of hacking the U
S. elections.A White House official confirmed there will be no 'pull aside' - State Department term for informal, unscheduled talks between world leaders that can happen at summits - between Trump and Putin
Both men were in the same room for the 'family photo' - the time when all the G20 leaders gather on stage for a group picture
Trump walked by Putin in order to get to his spot, but did not shake his hand or otherwise interact with him
Trump stood between French President Emanuel Macron and Japanese Prime Minister Shizo Abe for the event
After Trump unexpectedly nixed the Putin meeting on Thursday, Peskov told reporters the Kremlin had not yet received direct confirmation from the White House about it
"If this is indeed the case, the president will have a couple of additional hours in his schedule for useful meetings on the sidelines of the summit," Peskov quipped in reference to Putin
Sanders told reporters en route to Buenos Aires that the two sides had exchanged phone calls, but her language didn't reveal whether they had in fact connected
Peskov, as a senior aide to Putin, features in the stunning government information that accompanied Cohen's guilty plea Thursday
It described Cohen's efforts to contact a Russian official, known to be Peskov, about a Trump tower project in Moscow even as Trump plowed through the presidential primary process
Cohen falsely told Congress he did not recall 'any contacts by me' with a person identified as 'Russian Official 1
' However the information cites a May 2016 email where former Trump business partner Felix Sater said that 'Russia Official 1' wanted to invited him to a St
Petersburg business forum and introduce him to the president of Russia or another top official
-------------------------------------------
World AIDS Day 2018 - What "The AIDS Memorial" Teaches us... - Duration: 2:16.
What "The AIDS Memorial" teaches us.
Many of you are probably like myself and fall into either the millennial generation or younger
and as such many of us take for granted the time that we live in.
It really is a remarkable time to think that with today's technology, we can actually manage
HIV so it is no longer a death sentence.
We have preventative medications such as PREP and TRUVADA that can prevent the transmission
of the HIV virus.
However, this wasn't always true in the past.
The further back in time you go, say for example my parents generation, HIV and AIDS was widely
misunderstood.
Those who developed the infection were shamed, abandoned and in many times demonized and
completely ostracized from society.
There wasn't a regular standard for treatment that was widely available and affordable for
your average person.
When someone was diagnosed with HIV, it was generally much too late to even attempt any
form of long lasting treatment other than comfort, and a lot of what was available for
treatment was not something that the average person could afford.
When we compare that to today, we can see how truly amazing it is to live in a time
where not only can the average person diagnosed with HIV lead a relatively healthy and normal
life, they can also thrive.
Many nights ago, after way too many cups of coffee, I stumbled across "The Aids Memorial"
on Instagram.
The Aids Memorial pays tribute to many of those who have lost their lives to HIV and
AIDS in the past.
But not only does it do this, it puts faces and real stories to the numbers associated
with those that we've lost.
It's a truly beautiful and solemn reminder of what the battle against HIV and AIDS means
not only to our current times but the impact that it has had upon our society.
The AIDS Memorial teaches us to cherish the time that we have, to live and to love, and
to never forget the faces, the names and the stories of those we have lost.
We must never forget those who were unfairly taken away from us.
The project has moved me many times and it is something that I think everyone should
sit down and read and scroll through when they have the time.
It has helped shape my views on the past, strengthened my resolve to fight against ignorance
and stand up and continue to voice the need for much needed research, more public education,
and more widely available, affordable medications and treatment.
-------------------------------------------
George H W Bush, former US president, dies aged 94 - Duration: 2:38.
George H W Bush , the 41st President of the United States, died on Friday aged 94
Family spokesman Jim McGrath says Mr Bush died shortly after 10 pm Friday, about eight months after the death of his wife, Barbara Bush
The nation's 41st president served from 1989 to 1993, and eight years later watched his son George W
became the 43rd president. The elder Bush saw his popularity swell with the United States' success in the Gulf War in 1991, only to watch it evaporate in a brief but deep recession
The Republican was defeated in his bid for a second term by Democrat Bill Clinton
Mr Bush had also been a World War II hero, Texas congressman, CIA director and Ronald Reagan's vice president
Only one other U.S. president, John Adams, had a son who also became president. His son, former president George W Bush, paid tribute to him as a "man of highest character and the best dad a son or daughter could ask for"
Statement by the 43rd President of the United States, George W. Bush, on the passing of his father this evening at the age 94
pic.twitter.com/oTiDq1cE7h— Jim McGrath (@jgm41) December 1, 2018 More to come
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Coast Guard crew returns - Duration: 3:02.
For more infomation >> U.S. Coast Guard crew returns - Duration: 3:02. -------------------------------------------
Why US Life Expectancy Is Declining - Duration: 3:48.
For more infomation >> Why US Life Expectancy Is Declining - Duration: 3:48. -------------------------------------------
Paint Drying (2016) US Trailer - Duration: 0:35.
*music*
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét