Thứ Bảy, 11 tháng 11, 2017

Youtube daily so Nov 11 2017

Hello! And welcome to MCM Comic Con!

My name is John and I'm from Final Boss Fight!

Hi!!

Hi!!

I'm with Shern!

And she is...

Luxray

Yeah..

And she does real good cosplays too!

Look at this!

She's even got a tiny tail!

YEAH!

That's perfect!

And Luke what do you think of her cosplay?

It's great!

It's great?

There's certain aspects of her I enjoy more...

But we won't be going to it today.

Thank you...

Well...

Hello!

Hello!

This is my pikachu!

Aaah! Cool!

How did you get it?

Let's get the Pikachu some artworks

Where is your trainer?

I am the trainer...

YEAH!!

We have food!

Let's go.

All these offerings for the Pikachu!

I know! Come on then!

Bye Pikachu!

Come here Pikachu.

Pikachu needs restitching up

Look at his arm!

Pikachy needs to have a neck too

So I'm here back with... the Voice Guy!

Yes, hello!

Now that you did your pants up once again...

We met this guy just yesterday!

And he has an amazing voice!

Yes!

Apparently too, YEAH! WOOH!

Apparently they agree as well, that's what the whooing's for!

We might be working together...

Yes...

In the future of course.

So that's why, coming to MCM is important!

You meet that kind of guy!

Of course!

It's all about the connexions!

And there's a good connexion growing here!

Oh my god...

And here we are for the last time at Comic Con...

It's soon gonna be the end...

And this evening, I go back to Paris.

So behind me...

There's the friends.

They're still all here.

A small sum up of Comic Con

That was...

That was two intense days...

But really funny

I could meet...

Queen, Whitey, Luke and James Play...

Everybody!

And... As I've been wanting to meet them for a long time... It's really...

It was a delight, really.

Are you speaking in English or French?

I'm speaking French.

Oooh nice!

Yeah because... Queen, here.

"BONJOUUUR!"

Queen here who...

"BONJOUUUUUUUR!!!"

Just here.

Who's just there, hates it when I speak French.

Yeah.

Because she doesn't understand a thing.

I don't know what you're saying so fuck off!

I... I'm just saying you hate me speaking in French because you don't understand a thing.

Pretty much, yeah.

Yeah.

So, are you sad it's the end of the day?

Oh yeah.

I'm also sad it's the end of the weekend...

The end of Comic Con...

and I must go back and not see you...

(faking crying real bad)

We'll see each other again!

In May!

In May, yeah!

Yeah, yeah...

With your bloody panda!

My back is hurting ME!!!

Well guys!

It's the end!

The commotion

and cries...

Oh yeah, BYE!

BYE!!

Bye!

Bye, they don't care!

They're already on their way...

I got to go now!

There are people waiting for me

Apparently, there's always a possibility...

Maybe... I'M NOT THAT LONELY!

Right!

The Voice Guy is going to join the Voice Family!

Yes...

So, bye Voice Guy!

Bye, bye!

Yup, it's the end!

Everybody leaves...

Game Hog...

Game Hog.

John...

Hello!

Err... The ass of Luke I think.

And there's Random...

Random Shern...

Bye Random...

And...

BYE!!

Bye, bye bye!

There's James... There's people over there...

And they're all saying goodbye because it's the end and I'm already crying!

IT'S TIME TO LEAVE!!

It's time to leave, yes...

The big doors are gonna be closed...

And we won't be able to get out!

Oh... shit.

Run! Run while you can!! FLY YOU FOOL!!

Summing up Comic Con...

That was two crazy days, two great days, two intense days

I really LOVED it

Met many interesting people

Well then... So I'm going back to Paris.

I might not film that because it's boring.

But...

T'was Luke.

And so...

Thank you friends and I do hope you enjoyed the videos... And don't forget!

Friendship on YouTube is important, and go subscribe to every channel I named earlier!

Bye guys, we see each other again very soon for another video on Geek Worlds!

Bye everyone!

Like, comment and subscribe to us!!

For more infomation >> SKARR AT COMIC CON - Day 2 Part 2 : AND SO IT ENDS - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

Giang hồ hải phòng có TUỔI gì so với tập đoàn Mafia này - Duration: 7:11.

For more infomation >> Giang hồ hải phòng có TUỔI gì so với tập đoàn Mafia này - Duration: 7:11.

-------------------------------------------

How to Speak English Fluently When You Don't Know so Many Words - Duration: 3:54.

Hi! My name is Jason Palmer and I'm an English teacher from Toronto, Canada.

Today we're going to talk about how to speak English when you don't know that

many words. A lot of experts say that in order to learn any new language it's

important to learn the most important words in that language, usually the top

300. If you know the most important or mostly used words, the 300 mostly used,

usually that's enough to start a conversation and to feel a little bit

comfortable to speak in that language. But 300 words is not a lot of words and

you might feel a little bit shy about speaking a new language. So, it's

important to be willing to make mistakes. This is the most important part of

learning anything, especially learning a new language. So, the more you practice

and the more you make mistakes - the faster you'll be able to speak more

comfortably in English. The second thing that's important to note is that you

should start by maybe memorizing some phrases as well. If you can memorize

phrases, this can help you... this can help give you more confidence

in the language. So, memorizing may be common phrases like greetings, how to

respond at a restaurant or for doing everyday typical things - this could make

you feel very comfortable and give you some more vocabulary to use into

practice. Thirdly, I think an important thing to do is to focus on using the

words you have. Use them like a tool. So, when you don't know other words you can

still use the words you know to describe things and to explain yourself. So, quite

often I see students who struggle to find a word in their mind and they need

to find a dictionary or do something to translate, but really it's better to

force yourself to use the words you already know. It helps you to

construct things with the right grammar and to really kind of focus on looking at

things from a different perspective. So, it's a great way to use the language

that you already know. Also the more you struggle when there are words that you

don't know, it's more likely that you will remember those words once you learn

them. So a big part of learning is putting in a lot of effort and hard work

and trying to remember anything that you learn. Finally, it's very important that

you push yourself. So, practice as much as you possibly can, get out there, make

mistakes, try to learn new things. Just because you don't know a lot of words

it's not an excuse to not learn the language. There's always something new

you can learn and you push yourself to the next level. One other problem I

notice with a lot of students is that quite often they might reach a plateau,

maybe some level where they can communicate everything they need to

communicate effectively enough, but it's hard to really grow in the language. So, I

always recommend learning new things, new grammar, practicing everything that you

learned, get out there and try as much as possible. And that's the best way to

learn. Okay, and just to review: remember don't be afraid to make mistakes,

memorize phrases, practice describing things with the words that you know. and

always push yourself. And that's it for me today. Don't forget to subscribe to

the link below. This has been Jason Palmer and I'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> How to Speak English Fluently When You Don't Know so Many Words - Duration: 3:54.

-------------------------------------------

OFFICIAL LIST: HERE'S ALL THE HOLLYWOOD PLAYERS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SO FAR - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 5:46.

After the Harvey Weinstein scandals broke, exposing the pedophiles and sexual predators

which lurk in Hollywood's upper elite, dozens of other victims have begun to come out, showing

us just how deep the abuse goes.

Since it's been getting hard to keep track of so many people, we thought it might be

useful to put together a "definitive list," of every Hollywood power player who's been

accused of sexual misconduct in some form.

This includes sexual harassment, sexual assault, and other sex-related accusations.

Note that these aren't all definitively proven just yet—some of them may be complete

lies and attempts to smear a reputation, while others could be entirely truthful.

So with that in mind, here's our list of every single producer, director, or actor

who's been accused of misconduct in the Hollywood sex scandal.

Ben Affleck, 45, has been accused of groping MTV host Hilarie Burton during a 2003 appearance

on Total Request Live.

He has since issued an apology, confirming the validity of the accusation.

Louis C.K., 50, was accused of sexual misconduct by five women in an expose published by the

New York Times.

They claim that he masturbated during phone conversations with them, and in front of them

while asking them to watch.

Andy Dick, 51, has been accused of "groping peoples' genitals," along with "unwanted

kissing/licking and sexual propositions" to at least four women on the set of independent

feature film Raising Buchanon.

he has denied the groping claims, but admitted to licking and propositioning people.

David Guillod, manager and producer, was accused of drugging and sexually assaulting actress

Jessica Barth in 2012.

These allegations have not been proven yet, and we are still waiting to hear more.

Dustin Hoffman, 80, was accused of sexual harassment by Anna Graham Hunter in an article

published by The Hollywood Reporter.

he has also been accused of making "verbal advances" on Wendy Riss Gatsiounis, although

this has not been confirmed.

Ethan Kath, 34, was accused of rape on October 24th by a former bandmate, Alice Glass.

She claims that the sexual abuse lasted for nearly 10 years, starting when she was 15

years old.

Jeremy Piven, 52, was accused by actress Ariane Bellamar of groping her on two occasions.

Piven has denied the allegations so far.

Brett Ratner, 48, was accused of sexually harassing six women in a report from Los Angeles

Times.

He has decided to sue Melanie Kohler for libel, but is no longer working with Warner Brothers.

Twiggy Ramirez, 46, was accused of rape on October 20th by Jack Off Jill singer Jessicka

Addams, who claims that Ramirez (whose real name is Jeordie White) sexually assaulted

her while they were dating.

Chris Savino, 46, has been fired from Nickelodeon after multiple women filed complains against

him.

According to CBS News, he has since issued an apology writing that he is "deeply sorry"

for his words and actions, which may have caused discomfort among women.

Steven Seagal, 65, has been accused of sexual harassment by Portia de Rossi, who claims

he unzipped his pants during a private audition.

Kevin Spacey, 58, has been accused of making sexual advances towards Anthony Rapp when

he was only 14 years of age.

He has since come out as gay, and apologized for the "drunken behavior" he exhibited

to Rapp.

Jeffrey Tambor, 73, has been accused of engaging in "inappropriate behavior" by his former

assistant, a transgender woman named Van Barnes.

Tambor, who plays a transgender woman on Amazon original Transparent, has since rejected these

claims.

James Toback, 72, has been accused of sexually harassing over 300 women according to a bombshell

report by the Los Angeles Times on October 27th.

Actress Julianne Moore accused Toback of preying on aspiring actresses, exchanging sexual favors

for roles.

Bob Weinstein, 63, has been accused of harassing TV producer Amanda Segel.

According to a story by Variety, Weinstein invited her to dinner, to his home and to

a hotel, during a three month time period in the summer of 2016.

Harvey Weinstein, 65, has been accused of decades of alleged sexual harassment and sexual

assault.

His list of accusers now totals 76 women, now including actresses Angelina Jolie, Gwyneth

Paltrow, and Rose McGowan.

Ed Westwick, 30, was accused of rape by actress Kristina Cohen, who filed a report of sexual

assault with the Hollywood police station on November 7th. Cohen claims that Westwick

raped her at his house three years ago, but Westwick has denied the allegations.

As more and more victims come out, many are left wondering whether the Hollywood sex scandal

is just a massive witch hunt, or if there's something sinister lurking behind the curtains.

Conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones and Mark Dice have long suggested that Hollywood

is filled with pedophiles and corrupt sexual deviants, but others disagree.

For more infomation >> OFFICIAL LIST: HERE'S ALL THE HOLLYWOOD PLAYERS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SO FAR - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

After NOAA's winter outlook, WKBN meteorologist says 'not so fast' - Duration: 1:50.

For more infomation >> After NOAA's winter outlook, WKBN meteorologist says 'not so fast' - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

GZSZ-Jule steigt aus: SO emotional sagt das Team Adieu - Duration: 2:17.

For more infomation >> GZSZ-Jule steigt aus: SO emotional sagt das Team Adieu - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

【 MMD 】-【Sozuky】-My BoyFriend 7w7-So x Azus x Sofy(? - Duration: 0:41.

For more infomation >> 【 MMD 】-【Sozuky】-My BoyFriend 7w7-So x Azus x Sofy(? - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

Marius Hoppe: Nackt! Darum wird sein Sixpack so gehypt - Duration: 4:00.

For more infomation >> Marius Hoppe: Nackt! Darum wird sein Sixpack so gehypt - Duration: 4:00.

-------------------------------------------

Why is the Religious Resurgence in China so Monumental? - Duration: 1:43.

There was an article this week in The Economist magazine an observation that a

lot of people are making these days that there's a resurgence of religion in China.

And also mentioned about Christianity, they say around 80 million

Chinese are Christians I've heard as high as a hundred million. I remember one

day when I was in prayer the Lord spoke to me as I was getting ready to teach a

leadership class and He showed me the globe and He showed me how the

Christianity started in the Middle East and throughout history it's been kind of

traveling around the world: first to Europe than the Americas and then now of

course in Asia. And He spoke to me how that it's going to ultimately end up

back in the Middle East. I preached that message, and one day I was in Florida

I actually missed my plane so I went into a library or a bookstore to find

something to do and I found a book God in Beijing and in it they talked about

the amazing move of God there in China They were one of the ones who were

saying there's about a hundred million Christians in the country. But also in

that book they talked about a man who had a vision just like I did about the

moving of God in Christianity moving around the world. But added to it that

the Chinese the great revival that's there puts them in a great position to

finish that movement around the world. They were saying how that the Middle

East would be certainly opposed to American Christianity but if it comes

from the East they're going to be open to it.

The book of Revelation talks about a great army that comes from the east to

invade the Middle East. Well a lot of people think is Antichrist

I believe it's going to be the Christ who's going to be marching to that final

frontier and we're going to begin to see the greatest revival and harvest we've

ever seen in history.

For more infomation >> Why is the Religious Resurgence in China so Monumental? - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

What makes Doki Doki Literature Club so scary? - Duration: 10:13.

On the 22nd of September this year, a free-to-play visual novel named Doki Doki Literature Club

was released on steam.

Although it looks like your standard visual novel on the outside, it gained a lot of popularity

once people actually started looking into it.

Apparently, the game's lead developer Dan Salvato, came up with the idea for the game

because of his own mixed feelings towards anime and his love for unsettling and creepy

themes.

This definitely shows in Literature Club as the entire shtick of the game is that it messes

with your expectations.

The game isn't scary because it has blood, jump-scares and other startling scenes per

se.

If you were to start up a horror game, you'd expect such things and therefore, they may

not be as effective.

You know you're going to get scared.

That's just inevitable.

The point of the game is generating fear, you want to be scared.

It was made to scare you and make you feel creeped out and you know that.

But the only warning we get at the start of Doki Doki Literature Club is a short disclaimer

to not play this game if you are under the age of 13 or if you are easily scared by disturbing

content.

Yes, there is a link that you can click which will tell you the details of the game, but

that's completely optional to read.

Clicking the link will only give you a short warning message about some of the game's themes

and advise you to not play the game if you are struggling with mental health disorders

such as depression or anxiety.

But the warning itself that appears in-game doesn't tell us exactly what the disturbing

content is or when it's going to appear; effectively keeping the players on edge during the entire

time playing the game.

So what exactly is the thing that makes Doki Doki Literature Club so scary?

We're seen subversion's of tropes like this before.

And a lot of visual novels already contain disturbing content, so why is Literature Club

special?

It's because it presents its horror elements really fucking well.

There's not a single sign that anything is wrong in the game until about three hours

in, and at that point we've already been on edge because of the warning at the beginning.

It softly leads us into a false sense of security by holding our hand and making sure we're

as comfortable as possible.

It doesn't start off with a scary story, or a murder scene or anything violent or shocking

for that matter.

It's very much your standard visual novel.

You have the stereotypical character tropes present and each girl's personality is easy

to understand.

Someone who is used to visual novels, would simply be led to believe that the ''disturbing

content'' is part of a bad ending or so.

This is why Literature Club is so scary: because there is scary content where there

isn't supposed to be.

It's not very hard to figure out that the appeal behind romantic visual novels is the

dating.

Getting to spend time with the characters, bonding with them and eventually starting

a relationship is the end goal.

The majority of the audience who play romantic visual novels are often in it for this sake.

The appeal lies in the cute characters, the emotional investment and the romance.

We're not talking about just any visual novels here, because things like horror and mystery

visual novels do of course exist, but those games tend to rely a lot more on their stories.

Whilst most dating visual novels care less about the setting and pour all of their time

into making the CG's off all their characters look the absolutely adorable.

The point of romance visual novels is to sell the characters, sell the chase for a potential

relationship and sell a fantasy, to put it briefly.

So making a game like Doki Doki Literature Club, where everything seems to be just like

your usual romance visual novel suddenly turn dark, is what throws people off.

It's not as scary if you know you're going to be scared.

Back in the early days of the internet, I'm not sure if bringing this up is going to make

me seem old or not but nevertheless, there was a game called ''the red dot.''

Different pictures would appear on the screen with a red dot somewhere on them that you

were supposed to click on.

Each time you managed to find the dot on one of the pictures, the dot would get smaller

and smaller, making you lean in closer and closer to the screen before effectively jump-scaring

you with a bright, flashing image and a loud scream.

Of course, this was only a jump-scare and can't exactly be credited as horror but

my point is that it catches you off guard.

In this innocent game about finding and clicking on a dot, you're suddenly startled by a loud

noise and a flashing image.

Literature Club utilizes the same technique but a lot more complicated of course.

It works to get you invested in the game and its characters before suddenly hitting you

upside the head with a very startling and unsettling scene.

The game attacks you when you least expect it, when your brain is preoccupied with playing

the game and experiencing the romantic visual novel, it suddenly gets scary and catches

us off guard.

Creating an uncanny feeling inside the world where we felt safe just a few moments earlier.

But the game isn't as simple as to only use shocking content to scare the player.

There are several jump-scares in the game, but it also uses other techniques to make

the player feel uneasy.

Like distorting the music, messing up the dialogue, messing with the game files,

deleting characters, breaking the 4th wall and distorting the character

sprites.

All of this adds up to a very alarming experience.

The game takes the sounds, environments, sprites and UI and starts messing with it.

Sometimes, the changes are short-lived and pass by quickly and sometimes they drag on

for entire conversations.

It takes what we've familiarized ourselves with up until that point and starts throwing

us for a loop by making ever so slight changes to it every now and then.

Suddenly cutting the music and blurring a character's facial features or distorting

the music and giving a character photo-realistic eyes is unsettling because that's not how

things are ''supposed to be.''

It looks weird and is just strange enough that it creeps us out without being a jump-scare

every single time.

Not only is the idea of the game itself breaking scary, but the direction that the game takes

with the girls growing increasingly more unstable and paranoid at every turn is scary as hell.

Everyone starts acting strange.

One second they're fine and in the next they're a completely different person.

The girl's characters suddenly aren't easy to read anymore.

They're unpredictable and you can't be of any help.

The longer you play, you'll gradually begin to lose more and more control and there's

nothing you can do about it.

The game will delete your save files, force you into making certain dialogue choices and

remove all menu options.

By continuing to go through the game in this state, you'll soon find out that Monika is

the one who's actively messing with the game as you're playing it by deleting and/or altering

certain files.

It turns out that Monika wasn't given a route by the developer, but because she fell in

love with you, she decided to rework the game in order to give herself a

route.

This included making sure you wouldn't fall in love with any of the other girls as well,

meaning that she rewrote the three other girls to push them to the extreme and make sure

they weren't likable or just simply deleted completely.

Once she's had enough, Monika goes as far as to delete everything except for herself

and the clubroom.

This final scene with Monika is unsettling for several reasons.

First off, it's an eerily calm scene in comparison to what you've just been through for the past

couple of hours.

But she's also addressing you directly, not as in the character in the game but the person

who is currently playing it.

She tells you all about how she made a route for herself in the game by deleting all of

the other girls in order to give herself a happy ending together with you.

The thought of a computer program falling in love with someone who boots it up is already

unsettling, but now it's been given a face and a name as well.

She knows if you're playing the game through Steam or not.

She knows if you're recording the game.

She even gives you detailed instructions on how she went about deleting the other characters.

Which also ends up being her demise as the player can simply go about deleting Monika

in the same manner that she deleted the other three girls and then restart the game.

Although, doing this will eventually lead to the game crashing again after attempting

to start a new game without Monika.

I think Doki Doki Literature Club is about much more than simply subverting tropes.

It's not just about a character realizing that she's in a game, accidentally breaking

the 4th wall.

This is about a character remaking the game and deleting everything,

including the 4th wall.

You, as the player, has the goal of trying to date the girl in the game that you like

and at the same time, Monika has the goal of dating you.

So essentially, Doki Doki Literature Club is about the romantic visual novel that is

furiously trying to date you back.

I hope you enjoyed this video, thank you so much for watching.

For more infomation >> What makes Doki Doki Literature Club so scary? - Duration: 10:13.

-------------------------------------------

Trennung? Von wegen! So süß schwärmt Shakira von Gerard! - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> Trennung? Von wegen! So süß schwärmt Shakira von Gerard! - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

Anne Reburn - So It Goes (Official Audio) - Duration: 3:33.

Now I see it, what I needed So I'm leaving now, I'm letting go

It's taking everything in me Just to whisper, just to sleep

I'm giving in to what I need But now I know I have to leave

Yeah, now I know I have to leave

So I said it, so I said it, oh I'm letting go (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

So I let it, so I let it go So it goes (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

I'm biting tongue and dragging feet What if I'm leaving love behind me?

Am I afraid of never knowing, or just afraid of what I've gone through? Am I seeing hope or holding onto dust?

I should trust myself

So I said it, so I said it, oh I'm letting go (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

So I let it, so I let it go So it goes (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

Now I see it, what I needed So I'm leaving now, I'm letting go

(Goodbye, oh goodbye)

I'm not giving up, I'm giving in I'm not moving on just to play pretend

You can't dig your heels in And get where you're going

I'm not giving up, I'm giving in I'm not moving on just to play pretend

You can't dig your heels in If you wanna keep growing

So I said it, so I said it, oh I'm letting go (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

So I let it, so I let it go So it goes (Goodbye, oh goodbye)

For more infomation >> Anne Reburn - So It Goes (Official Audio) - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Paper cut - Why do paper cuts hurt so much? - Duration: 1:27.

Smart Learning for All

Topic: Paper cut

Why do paper cuts hurt so much?

It is because paper hates us.

No

We use our fingers and hands to sense our surroundings.

Hence, they have more number of nociceptors than any other parts of our body.

Nociceptors are pain receptors that respond to change in pressure, temperature, etc.

Now, the edges of the paper are not smooth but are rough or jagged.

Oh

They are like a saw.

Absolutely

Hence, sometimes when we rub our hands or especially fingertips against the edges, it cuts them like a saw, activating the nociceptors.

Now, as there are more nociceptors on our hands, we feel more pain.

In addition to this, the paper cut might also have fragments of paper containing chemicals which may irritate the skin and thus increase the pain.

For more educational videos please visit http://www.SmartLearningforAll.com

Also, don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

For more infomation >> Paper cut - Why do paper cuts hurt so much? - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

Why The Girl From Ed Sheeran's 'Perfect' Video Looks So Familiar - Duration: 1:53.

The music video for Ed Sheeran's sugar-sweet love song "Perfect" has everything you could

want in a winter love story: gorgeous scenery, cozy cabins, snowball fights, snow angels,

skiing montages, and… an intriguing match for the bashful Brit.

Playing the role of Sheeran's friend-turned-lover is actress Zoey Deutch, and chances are you've

seen her around.

After getting her start with a guest appearance on NCIS in 2011, the 23-year-old daughter

of '80s icon Lea Thompson has come to snag her fair share of screen time over the years.

Fans of Disney Channel's The Suite Life on Deck may recognize her from her role as Maya

Bennett, the girlfriend of Dylan Sprouse's character, Zack.

Others may recall her work in The CW's Ringer, in which she played the rebellious teen Juliet

Martin, acting opposite the show's star Sarah Michelle Gellar.

"Who would've ever thought that picking up trash would be this exhausting?"

While she began her career in television, she's since moved on to star in a number of

feature films, including Vampire Academy and Dirty Grandpa with fellow former Disney kid

Zac Efron.

Afterwards, Deutch acted alongside big screen pros Bryan Cranston and James Franco in the

comedy Why Him?

"I wanted to say, dad, that I love you."

"I love you, too, honey."

"I love you more."

"No you don't.

Love you to the moon and back!"

Then, in 2017, she took on the leading role in the drama Before I Fall, which told the

story of a teenage girl forced to relive her final day over and over again.

Deutch has also appeared on several magazines covers, modeling for the likes of InStyle,

Marie Claire, and Vanity Fair.

Deutch's appearance in "Perfect" wasn't her first starring turn in a music video.

In 2014, she appeared in The New Division's video for "Opium," which also featured a wintery

landscape and cabin setting.

By now, this promising up-and-comer should be a pro at running in the snow.

Thanks for watching!

Click the NIcki Swift icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Why The Girl From Ed Sheeran's 'Perfect' Video Looks So Familiar - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

Religion Has No Earthly Purpose, So Why Do We Cling to It? | Reza Aslan - Duration: 9:56.

Studies of children have shown that we are born with this instinct for what's called

"substance dualism," the idea that the body and the mind or soul, however you want

to think of the psyche, are separate.

Children who as young as three or four years old, who have not grown up with any kind of

religious instruction, naturally assume that they have a soul.

And so I think a lot of theorists believe that this belief in the soul is universal,

that it can be traced back deep into our evolution.

Why?

There's a whole host of reasons for that: I mean I suppose that if you're an "unbeliever"

you think that it's just some kind of evolutionary accident—It's a trick of the mind, as

it were, that makes you think that you are an immaterial being inside a material body.

If you're a believer you think that it's probably because there is a soul and maybe

perhaps that we were intentionally created in such a way as to think that there is more

to us than just the material realm.

It's really a choice, but what cannot be denied is that belief in the soul is a belief

that all peoples share regardless of their culture or their religion.

And it's a belief that goes back as far back in time as we can possibly trace it.

And if these psychological studies that I was talking about are right, it's a belief

that we're born with.

Over the last couple of hundred years, there's been an enormous amount of thought that's

gone into the question of "why religion?"

You know the one thing that we all agree on is that religion has been a part of the human

experience from the beginning.

In fact, we can trace the origin of religious experience to before homo sapiens.

We can trace it with some measure of confidence to Neanderthals.

We can measure it with a little less confidence all the way to Homo Erectus.

So we're talking hundreds of thousands of years before our species even existed.

So the question is why?

If religion is a universal phenomenon—or rather I should say religious experience—If

religious experience is a universal phenomenon, if it can be traced in all peoples, all cultures

and throughout all time, then there must be some evolutionary reason for it.

There must be a reason.

Some adaptive advantage to having a religious experience or faith experience.

Otherwise, it wouldn't exist.

And so there have been over the last couple of centuries numerous attempts to figure out

exactly what that adaptive advantage would be.

The most popular explanation, of course, is the sociological one: that religion creates

a sense of cohesion amongst a group.

And that sense of cohesion, the idea that we could come together and create a collective

identity based on shared symbols or shared metaphors gave an adaptive advantage to believing

communities that non-believing communities did not have.

That's a pretty good answer.

The problem is that religion is as much a divisive issue as it is a cohesive one.

It's as good at creating outgroups as it is in groups.

And more importantly, the problem with the social cohesion theory is that kinship was

a much more powerful and much more dominant form of social cohesion than religion was.

Our ancestors lived in small communities that were bound together by blood, by relationship,

by kinship long before they created symbols and mythologies in order to unify them.

So it's a pretty good answer, but it doesn't really explain what adaptive advantage religion

would have had.

Others have said well, it's about giving us answers to the unanswerable questions of

the world, that what it did was create a sense of knowledge about the universe that lessened

anxiety in some way, and that was an adaptive advantage.

Well even if that were true—and there's truly no reason scientifically to think that

it was—it's really hard to make an argument about why that would necessarily be an adaptive

advantage, particularly because religion actually causes far more anxiety than it lessens.

In fact, to put it in evolutionary terms, the cost of religious expression is enormous.

It's enormous in terms of time, it's enormous in terms of the cognitive processes that are

involved in it.

It sort of creates greater anxiety when you feel as though your actions have cosmic significance.

All of this is to say that the countless different answers that have been given for "Why religion?"

fail primarily because they're functionalist answers.

What they primarily say is what religion does, not why religion exists.

And so a group of cognitive scientists, particularly cognitive scientists who focus on religion,

have tried to look to a different way of answering this question of "why religion?"

And what they discovered is that number one, there is, in the end, no adaptive advantage

to religious faith.

And number two, that the reason that religion exists is because it is an accidental byproduct

of some other adaptive advantage.

And here we get into very complicated conversations about cognitive theory and the development

of our frontal lobes and things like that.

But to put it in its simplest way, religious thinking is embedded in our cognitive processes.

It is a mode of knowing.

We're born with it.

It's part of our DNA.

The question then becomes why?

One answer is that there is no why.

It's just simply an accident of other much more important, much more necessary cognitive

adaptions—adaptations, I should say.

Or if you're a believer you would say because we were made that way.

Because we are designed to believe that there is more to this world than the material realm.

That that mode of knowing that exists in our brain is there for a reason.

Either answer is fine.

There are some people who say well, what religion really does and the reason that it exists

is that it creates some morality, right?

That if we imagine that there's this absolute moral lawgiver then we're less likely to

kill our neighbor, and that creates some sort of adaptive advantage.

The problem with that theory, of course, is that the concept of a moral lawgiver is barely

5,000 years old, and religious expression goes hundreds of thousands of years.

I mean if you even think about the Mesopotamian gods or the Egyptian gods—and this is again

7,000 or 8,000 years ago—these were not moral beings.

On the contrary, they were amoral and often immoral beings!

So the idea that religion is about morality is a very new idea.

Others say that religion is about authority.

It's a way of maintaining control and power over a group, and perhaps those groups that

were religiously inclined had an adaptive advantage because that notion of an authority

structure allowed them to survive better.

Again, that's a pretty good answer.

The problem is that you're talking about institutionalized religious expression, which

maybe, maybe is 12,000 to 14,000 years old.

That's as far back as we can trace anything that looks like an institutional religious

authority.

And again that does not explain why religion existed hundreds of thousands of years before

that.

The truth of the matter is we just don't know.

But what is a fact is that there is something in the way that our brains work that compels

us to believe that we are more than just the sum of our material parts.

That thing is either an echo or an accident, or it's deliberate and purposeful.

And which you decide is purely a matter of choice because there is no proof either way.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét