Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 6, 2018

Youtube daily US Jun 2 2018

South Korea's defense chief Song Young-moo is in Singapore for this year's Shangri-La

Dialogue, Asia's largest security forum... and of course North Korea is the talk of the

town.

Song also held separate talks with his U.S. counterpart James Mattis on the sidelines.

Our Park Ji-won fies this report from the island state.

Delivering a speech entitled "De-escalating the North Korea crisis" at the forum's plenary

session on Saturday, Seoul's Defense Minister Song Young-moo stressed the Moon Jae-in administration's

North Korea policies and drive to denuclearize the peninsula not only contribute to the stability

of Northeast Asia,... but also promote global prosperity and peace.

He said South Korea's defense ministry will continue to closely consult with the North

to implement the Panmunjom Declaration,... where the two Koreas agreed to cease all hostile

acts and turn the Demilitarized Zone into a peace area.

During a Q&A session,...

Minister Song said he believed North Korea will comply with the international community's

demand that it denuclearize in a complete, verifiable, and irreversible manner,... known

in diplomatic speak as CVID.

"CVID is a promise that must be kept.

We believe North Korea, which hopes to be part of the international community will accept

the conditions, as complete verification is beneficial to the North."

U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, who also gave a speech on Saturday on U.S. leadership

and the challenges facing Indo-Pacific security,... insisted the issue of American forces in South

Korea is not related in any way to talks with North Korea,... saying it's a matter for Seoul

and Washington only.

"Any discussion about the number of U.S. troops in the Republic of Korea is subject to one;

the Republic of Korea's invitation to have them there; and the discussions between the

U.S. and the Republic of Korea, separate and distinct from the negotiations that are going

on with the DPRK."

Following their speeches,...

Song and Mattis held a closed-door meeting lasting around 45 minutes.

Song and Mattis expressed satisfaction right after the talks.

Their discussions focused on ensuring peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula and

both sides reaffirmed their iron-clad alliance.

The two defense chiefs also welcomed the results of the two recent inter-Korean summits,...

saying they hoped positive change on the peninsula will create the optimal conditions for the

upcoming North Korea-U.S. summit in Singapore.

"And the defense chiefs of South Korea, the U.S., and Japan will meet on Sunday morning,...

the last day of the Shangri-La Dialogue,... to jointly discuss ways to bring peace and

stability on the Korean Peninsula,... as well as deepening military cooperation among the

three countries.

Park Ji-won, Arirang News, Singapore."

For more infomation >> Defense chiefs of S. Korea, U.S. discuss peace and prosperity of Korean peninsula - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says no new U.S. sanctions on North Korea while two sides talking - Duration: 0:42.

Staying with that meeting at the White House.

U.S. President Donald Trump revealed there will be no new U.S. sanctions placed on North

Korea... while the two sides are engaged in dialogue.

Speaking to reporters outside the White House after seeing off Kim Yong-chol,... Trump also

said he doesn't want to use the term "maximum pressure" anymore to describe U.S. pressure

on North Korea.

He added that he looks forward to the day when he can take the sanctions off Pyongyang.

Regarding possible economic support and aid for the regime, President Trump deflected

such responsibility to the North's three closest neighbors -- South Korea, Japan, and China

-- citing the vast geographical distance between the U.S. and North Korea.

For more infomation >> Trump says no new U.S. sanctions on North Korea while two sides talking - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

'This Is Us' star Niles Fitch reflects on father in Atlanta - Duration: 4:02.

For more infomation >> 'This Is Us' star Niles Fitch reflects on father in Atlanta - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Love Background Music | No Copyright | Us Ringtone | 🔥Share chat🔥 - Duration: 0:57.

Hi friends

Welcome my Channel

Sharechat Ghantamaza

Love Background Music

Us all song and ringtone

No Copyright Music

Love You all Friends

Thanks Watching videos

One Like Brother Love You All Friends

For more infomation >> Love Background Music | No Copyright | Us Ringtone | 🔥Share chat🔥 - Duration: 0:57.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. 40 Garage Sale - Duration: 13:54.

For more infomation >> U.S. 40 Garage Sale - Duration: 13:54.

-------------------------------------------

4 dead, 7 hurt in t-bone crash on US 30 - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> 4 dead, 7 hurt in t-bone crash on US 30 - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

The US Federal Court System: How do you JOIN the courts? - Duration: 7:37.

In the United States court system, we've got all these federal courts, with all these federal judges.

860 of them at the moment, to be exact – which is a lot.

So, how exactly do you get that job?

Like, are there a bunch of people out there with resumes that say "proficient in Microsoft Excel, Photoshop, and really good at judging things"?

Not quite.

Federal judgeships are a lifetime appointment – once they get the job, they've got it for a long time.

And that's why the process of picking a judge is so complicated.

But don't worry, we're going to take it step by step.

Consider this your "I'm just a bill" for how a judge, becomes...like a different kind of judge.

The TL;DR version is that, according to Article II of the Constitution –

that's the one that talks about the powers of the executive branch – the President appoints federal judges with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Senators make a short list of judges, the President picks one, the Senate says yep, that person checks out, and Boom.

Judge for life.

But wait – don't I vote for these people?

Like, I definitely saw a bunch of judges on my ballot the last time I went to the polls.

Where does that all fit in?

Just like the federal government has an executive, legislative, and judicial branch, so does each state within it.

So your state has a Governor, a state legislature, and its own court system.

The way your state judges get picked depends on where you live.

In some states, they are appointed by the Governor or selected by the state legislature, but in 39 states, judges are elected by you.

We don't vote on federal judges, but lots of people who get picked to be federal judges start as out judges in their states.

So, that's a good reason not to skip that section on your ballot next time.

Anyway, back to advice and consent:

As soon as there's a vacant seat on the court, either because a judge retired or died, the Senate and the President need to start working together to fill it.

The whole idea behind having a representative government is that the people who are in charge of our laws, institutions, and infrastructure

are part of our communities – that they hear us and understand us and feel responsible to us.

That's why we have members of Congress representing every state and district.

And the same idea goes for federal judges.

Usually, when there is a vacancy in the court, the President asks for recommendations from

Senators in the state or states that the court serves, so that judge has an understanding of the legal system in that community.

Those home state Senators come up with recommendations in a few different ways.

In lots of states, they'll put together a federal nominating commission,

which is basically a team of well-respected lawyers in that state who know what's up on the legal scene and can recommend good judicial candidates.

A Senator might also get ideas from the local bar – no, not that kind of bar – the professional association that licenses lawyers in each state.

Once the home state Senators have a short list of candidates, they'll share it with the President – that's the advice part.

The White House will usually ask for information about the recommendations, like their education and employment history,

opinions they've given in past cases if they've been a judge in a lower court,

which organizations or political parties they've been involved in, and details about their finances, to make sure they can make fair decisions.

Basically, they want to make sure that nobody is gonna offer a judge special perks or money to say,

"hey, Your Honor, I really need you to rule in favor of Team Vegetable in this 'are tomatoes fruit' case."

You know somebody out there is in the pocket of Big Vegetable.

The White House takes all that information, and then they do even more research.

They try to figure out if the judge is qualified by interviewing the candidates, their supervisors,

lawyers they've worked with, lawyers they've worked against, friends, colleagues,

pretty much anybody who would know about their work in the legal profession.

They even investigate candidate's tax returns, criminal record, and medical history.

I mean, once you appoint a judge, there's no going back, right?

So it makes sense that if you want someone who is qualified, has integrity, and is who they say they are, you would ask everyone who might know about those things!

You can't take it back if your brand-new Supreme Court Justice was exaggerating about being proficient in Excel.

There's one more step before the President announces a nomination, but it happens outside the White House.

The American Bar Association, that nonpartisan professional organization of lawyers we talked about before, will rate each of the candidates on their qualifications.

"Well Qualified" ratings go to the candidates who have the best of the best reputations in their field,

and are seen by their peers as experts at interpreting the law in the most unbiased manner.

A "Qualified" rating means that the ABA thinks they're competent enough to do this (very hard) job,

but in a normal way, not in, like, a heart eyes and hundred emojis way.

A "Not Qualified" rating means that the people whose job it is to decide who is qualified to practice law say the candidate is not qualified to practice law at this important of a level.

The President doesn't have to take a candidate's ABA rating into account,

but it's a pretty bad look if they nominate someone that everyone else says is not qualified.

Once the White House has had a chance to review allll of this advice, the President nominates one person for the role;

usually it's someone the home state Senators recommended, but not always.

Then, the Senate has to approve the President's nominee – that is the consent part.

First, the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is the group of Senators who lead the advice and consent process,

sends a form to the Senators in the states where the nominee would be serving to ask them their opinion of the nominee.

The form is a slip of paper, and it's blue, so to make it easy on all of us, they call it a blue slip.

This is where the Senator can write about why they are in favor of or against the candidate being appointed judge.

If the President didn't take their advice on nominees, or nominated someone who they think isn't qualified,

they can delay the process or prevent a nominee from becoming a judge by writing a negative opinion on their blue slip,

or even failing to send their blue slip back to the Senate.

But if the blue slips look good, the Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing to ask questions.

It's kinda like any other job interview – except there are a couple dozen people there,

and it might be aired on C-SPAN, and they can still send you written questions after the face-to-face part is over.

Then that small committee of Senators votes on whether the candidate should become a judge.

They decide whether to bring the candidate to the full Senate for a vote, and if they do,

whether they recommend that the Senate should consent or not consent to the nomination.

The last step in the whole process is for the full Senate to vote on the nominee.

This is another place the process can get slowed down, because it's up to the Senate Majority Leader to schedule the vote.

If the Majority Leader doesn't agree with the nomination they can put voting off, or just not schedule it at all,

as we saw when Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declined to schedule a hearing on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland,

so he just never got rejected or confirmed.

But when the Senate follows their normal process, they debate about whether or not to confirm the nominee until 2/3 of the Senate says they're ready to go to a vote.

That two-thirds agreement to end the debating is called a cloture vote.

Then the real vote happens, and if a majority of Senators say,

"Yes this person should be a federal judge," the President officially appoints that person to serve on the court for-ev-er.

Or, at least until they decide to retire. Or they die.

We'll cover how you fit into this whole process soon, but next time, we'll talk about what happens now.

Once a judge is appointed to a federal court, what do they actually do there?

They judge cases, duh!

But figuring out the right way to decide them?

That takes a whole new kind of judgment in itself.

For more infomation >> The US Federal Court System: How do you JOIN the courts? - Duration: 7:37.

-------------------------------------------

4 dead, 7 hurt in T-bone crash on US 30 - Duration: 2:04.

For more infomation >> 4 dead, 7 hurt in T-bone crash on US 30 - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

Jobs Report Shows Strong Growth In Tri-State, Across U.S. - Duration: 1:50.

For more infomation >> Jobs Report Shows Strong Growth In Tri-State, Across U.S. - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says no new U.S. sanctions on North Korea while two sides talking - Duration: 0:30.

Staying with that extraordinary meeting at the White House.

U.S. President Donald Trump revealed that there will be no new U.S. sanctions placed

on North Korea while the two sides are engaged in dialogue.

Speaking to reporters after he saw off Kim Yong-chol at the White House,... Trump also

said he doesn't want to use the term "maximum pressure" anymore to describe U.S. pressure

on North Korea.

He added that he looks forward to the day when he can take the sanctions off Pyongyang.

For more infomation >> Trump says no new U.S. sanctions on North Korea while two sides talking - Duration: 0:30.

-------------------------------------------

Liverpool FC transfer target Christian Pulisic revelation made by US reporter ● News Now ● #LFC - Duration: 2:23.

LIVERPOOL transfer news is hotting up and fans will be excited by the latest update

on Christian Pulisic.

Pulisic is the USA's hottest prospect in a generation and he's already made waves

in Europe with Borussia Dortmund.

The winger is a long-term target of Jurgen Klopp, who's looking to splash the cash

at beaten Champions League finalists Liverpool.

Grant Wahl, who works for US publication Sports Illustrated, has kept close tabs on Pulisic's

career to date.

And he's now revealed where he believes the 19-year-old is most likely to end up if

he quits Borussia Dortmund this summer.

"Hi Grant.

What's your prediction on Pulisic's next club after Dortmund, and when do you think he'll

make the move?," Wahl was asked in a Reddit 'Ask Me Anything' session.

And he replied: "If I had to make a pick, I'd say Liverpool, as soon as this summer."

Wahl says Pulisic could just as easily stick with Dortmund, while some of Liverpool's

rivals are keen on the Hershey-born ace too.

"But could also see him staying in Dortmund another year, and teams like Tottenham, Arsenal,

Bayern Munich and Man United in the mix," he added.

Pulisic's father, Mark, this week dismissed claims his son could call it a day at Borussia

Dortmund this summer though.

"He was linked to Tottenham.

Last week it was Liverpool.

The week before Man United.

The week before this... it's hogwash," he said.

"He's linked with a different club every week.

I have no idea.

"Now is the time that the season has just ended that we'll sit down with Dortmund, we'll

sit down with, I don't know whether others clubs are in the mix, and see what Dortmund's

idea is and their plans for Christian.

"But there's nothing concrete.

Right now, Christian plays for Dortmund and that's where he is planning on playing again

next year."

For more infomation >> Liverpool FC transfer target Christian Pulisic revelation made by US reporter ● News Now ● #LFC - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

POOL PARTY FAMILY FUN DAY | SWIM WITH US | FAMILY VLOG - Duration: 12:04.

Alright guys we are all getting out of the pool.

We had a fun afternoon in the pool of course.

It is so nice and refreshing.

It was a little cold at first, it took me a little while to get in of course, but I'm

not one of those dive right in girls I guess.

So thank you so much for watching.

Go ahead and subscribe, thumbs up, check all the links down below.

And I will see you next time.

For more infomation >> POOL PARTY FAMILY FUN DAY | SWIM WITH US | FAMILY VLOG - Duration: 12:04.

-------------------------------------------

Canada Slaps Tariffs On US In Response To Trump - Duration: 15:27.

EARLIER THIS YEAR THERE WERE A FEW ROUNDS BACK AND FORTH OF

PROPOSED TARIFFS BETWEEN THE U.S. AND CHINA, DONALD TRUMP

FINALLY GETTING TO MAKE GOOD ON HIS DECADES LONG VENDETTA

AGAINST CHINA, WHETHER REAL OR PERCEIVED, AND SOME OF THE

TARIFFS WERE PUT INTO PLACE, SOME IT IS IMPLIED THAT THEY

WILL GO INTO EFFECT, WE HAVE PUT TARIFFS ON SOME OF THEIR GOODS,

THEY HAVE DONE THE SAME, IT ALREADY HAS HURT A FEW

INDUSTRIES INCLUDING SOYBEANS IN THE U.S., NOW IT'S GOING EVEN

FURTHER, AND IT ISN'T JUST AGAINST CHINA --

FOR EXAMPLE, I BELIEVE THAT CANADA IS THE SINGLE LARGEST

EXPORTER TO US OF THESE TYPES OF METALS, ABOUT SIX TIMES AS MUCH

AS CHINA IS.

SO IF HE IS STICKING A THUMB IN EYE OF CHINA

HE'S STICKING A WHOLE HANDFUL INTO TRUDEAU'S EYES OVER THAT.

THEY AREN'T HAPPY ABOUT IT, TRUDEAU AND OTHERS ARE

RESPONDING, HERE IS TRUDEAU WITH CANADA'S POSITION.

THESE TARIFFS ARE TOTALLY UNDETECTABLE.

THAT CANADA COULD

BE CONSIDERED A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT TO THE UNITED

STATES IS INCONCEIVABLE.

THESE TARIFFS WILL HARM INDUSTRY AND

WORKERS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CANADA/U.S. BORDER.

THESE

TARIFFS ARE AN AFFRONT TO THE LONG-STANDING SECURITY

PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES, AND IN

PARTICULAR AN AFFRONT TO THE THOUSANDS OF CANADIANS WHO HAVE

FOUGHT AND DIED ALONGSIDE THEIR AMERICAN BROTHERS IN ARMS.

I'VE

BEEN VERY CLEAR THAT MY INTERACTIONS WITH PRESIDENT

TRUMP HAVE BEEN CLEAR AND FIRM, WE HAVE ALWAYS, AND INDEED HE

HAS ALWAYS, UNDERSTOOD THAT I WILL COME AND DO, STAND UP FOR

CANADIAN INTERESTS AND CANADIAN -- CANADIAN WORKERS.

THIS DECISION BY THE U.S. ADMINISTRATION WILL HURT

CANADIANS, IT WILL HURT AMERICANS, AND WE REGRET THAT

DEEPLY.

OF COURSE THE TARIFFS AGAINST THEM, THAT IS TROUBLE FOR

CANADA, BUT IT TURNS OUT THERE IS ACTUALLY SOMETHING THESE

OTHER COUNTRIES CAN DO IN RESPONSE.

IT'S NEVER BEEN TRIED

BEFORE -- THEY CAN SET UP TARIFFS AGAINST US.

AND IT LOOKS

LIKE THEY ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO DO THAT.

HERE IS THE MINISTER OF

FOREIGN AFFAIRS TALKING ABOUT CANADA'S LIKELY COUNTER ACTIONS.

WE ARE IMPOSING DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR TARIFFS FOR EVERY DOLLAR

LEVIED AGAINST CANADIANS BY THE U.S. WE ARE TODAY BEGINNING A 15

DAY CONSULTATION PERIOD WITH CANADIANS SO THAT THEY MAY

EXPRESS THEIR SUPPORT FOR OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED

COUNTERMEASURES AND THE LISTS OF GOODS.

THIS IS $16.6 BILLION OF

RETALIATION.

THIS IS THE STRONGEST TRADE ACTION CANADA

HAS TAKEN IN THE POSTWAR ERA.

IF YOU'VE BEEN PAYING ATTENTION YOU CAN PROBABLY

UNDERSTAND OR PREDICT WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT, TRUMP WILL GET

PISSED OFF AT WHAT THEY DID, ADD SOME NEW TARIFFS, THEY WILL FEEL

OBLIGATED TO DO THE SAME, WE'VE SEEN THIS PLAY OUT BEFORE, AND I

WANT TO CONTEXTUALIZE THESE COUNTER ACTIONS A LITTLE BECAUSE

SAYING WE ARE GOOD TO PUT TARIFFS ON STEEL AND ALUMINUM,

FOREMOST REGULAR PEOPLE THAT DOESN'T REALLY MEAN ANYTHING, IT

WILL AFFECT YOU, YOU DON'T BUY STEEL BEAMS BUT ALUMINUM GOES

INTO THE CARS YOU BUY, CANS YOU PURCHASE, ALL SORTS OF

APPLIANCES AND THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT THE E.U. IS ALSO RESPONDING,

THE ECONOMIC REGULATORY COMMISSION MET AND HAS AN

EIGHT-PAGE LIST OF THINGS THEY WILL THEN BE PUTTING TARIFFS ON

THAT INCLUDES --

ANY NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTS, WHICH MEANS THAT IF

YOU ARE LIVING IN THE RUST BELT YOU MIGHT SAY LOOK AT TRUMP, HE

IS STANDING UP FOR US, STEEL IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE

EXPENSIVE TO EXPORT TO US -- AND THEN THE PRODUCTS THAT YOU MAKE,

WHEN YOU TRY TO SELL THEM ABROAD, AS WE DO AS A COUNTRY,

YOU WILL NOW SELL LESS OF THEM, THERE WILL BE LESS DEMAND FOR

AMERICAN GOODS BECAUSE OF THESE OBVIOUS REACTIONS FROM THE

E.U., CANADA, MEXICO, AND RELATED COUNTRIES.

SO CHINA IS COMING NEXT, AND THIS IS ABOUT 12 TO $16 BILLION

AS THE EXPLAINED FROM CANADA RETALIATING, THE CHINESE ARE

TALKING ABOUT $200 BILLION, THAT WE WOULD DO TO THEM AND THEY

WOULD DO TO US, AND RETALIATION.

BUT I WANT TO STAY ON CANADA FOR

ONE SECOND BECAUSE TRUMP TWEETED OUT THEY MUST OPEN THEIR MARKETS

AND TAKE DOWN THEIR TRADE BARRIERS, THERE REPORT A REALLY

HIGH SURPLUS ON TRADE WITH US.

AND OF COURSE AS USUAL THAT'S

NOT TRUE.

YOU WOULD THINK HE WOULD ACCIDENTALLY GET SOME

THINGS RIGHT.

AND ON THE ISSUE OF THE TRADE SURPLUS, WE HAVE A

TRADE DEFICIT WITH MOST EVERYONE SO IT'S LIKE SHOOTING FISH IN A

BARREL.

THE ONE COUNTRY WE DON'T HAVE A DEFICIT WITH HIS CANADA,

WE ACTUALLY HAVE A TRADE SURPLUS WITH CANADA OF $12.5 BILLION,

AND HE GOT THE ONE COUNTRY WRONG.

BUT IN AN EARLIER

INTERACTION HE BRAGGED ABOUT, TRUDEAU CAME IN HERE AND SAID

THEY HAVE A SURPLUS WITH US -- THAT WE HAVE A SURPLUS WITH

THEM, AND I MADE IT UP THAT WE DON'T, I TOLD HIM WE HAVE A

DEFICIT, I MADE IT UP.

WHY ARE YOU BRAGGING ABOUT THAT?

WHAT A

WEIRDO YOU ARE, WHAT A STRANGE MAN YOU ARE. AND WHAT IS THE

POINT OF THAT STORY, WHAT DOES IT PROVE OTHER THAN THE FACT

THAT YOU ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR?

AND YOU KNOW THEY COULD

JUST LOOK IT UP, RIGHT?

YOU KNOW THEY AREN'T JUST GOING TO TAKE

YOUR WORD FOR IT AND BE LIKE, OKAY, I GUESS THE U.S. HAS A

DEFICIT, FINE, YOU WIN.

BECAUSE HE'S USED TO MAKING THESE

BACKROOM DEALS, OH, YEAH, I'LL GIVE YOU THAT IF YOU GIVE ME

THIS, AND THEN YOU'LL ABOUT IT AND THE GUY DOESN'T FIND OUT --

YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT, THEY ARE GOING TO FIND OUT!

BUT I'M SUPER

CURIOUS WHAT YOU GUYS THINK ABOUT THE TRADE OVERALL, AND

SOME OF THESE SANCTIONS THAT ARE BEING -- NOT SANCTIONS BUT

OBVIOUSLY TARIFFS THAT ARE BEING PUT INTO PLACE.

OBVIOUSLY THIS IS ALL RIDICULOUS, BUT WHAT IS A SHAME

IS THAT IT ALSO DISTRACTS FROM THE MEDIUM AND LONG-TERM ISSUE,

AND THAT IS OUR TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE BROKEN.

THE FIX ISN'T

IMPOSING TARIFFS, THE FIX IS NEGOTIATING ON BEHALF OF WORKERS

RIGHTS SO THERE IS RECIPROCITY, BECAUSE OUR WORKERS ARE GETTING

THE SHORT END OF THE STICK RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE WE ARE TRADING WITH

COUNTRIES THAT ALLOW IN MANY CASES SLAVE LABOR, THAT DON'T

HAVE APPROPRIATE HUMAN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT IN LABOR PRACTICES,

SO OUR WORKERS ARE AT A DISADVANTAGE.

WHAT WE OUGHT TO

BE DOING WITH OUR POWER AROUND THE WORLD IS NOT IMPOSING CRAZY

TARIFFS THAT LEAD TO WAR, BUT RATHER ADVOCATING FOR MORE HUMAN

RIGHTS, FOR MORE WORKERS' RIGHTS, SO THAT IF YOU WANT TO

ENTER INTO A TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES YOU HAVE

TO CALL YOUR WORKERS THE RIGHTS THAT OUR WORKERS HAVE SO THERE

IS AN EVEN PLAYING FIELD.

IN THIS SITUATION, IF YOU DRAW IT

UP OVER A LONG TIME, IS IN PART OWNED BY THE CORPORATE

DEMOCRATS.

THE UNIVERSE HATES A VACUUM, AND OVER THE LAST FEW

YEARS THAT HASN'T BEEN A COUNTER TO THE UNFETTERED ENTHUSIASM FOR

GLOBAL TRADE.

DEMOCRATS HAVE SAID NO HARD NEGOTIATING IN

TRADE DEALS, WHICH HAS SOLD US DOWN THE RIVER.

SO OUR RESPONSIBILITY AS DEMOCRATS IS TO ADVANCE A

PROGRESSIVE TRADE AGENDA BASED ON EQUALIZING WORKER RIGHTS

AND HUMAN RIGHTS AROUND THE WORLD, AND MAYBE THIS IS A

CHANCE WHILE PEOPLE ARE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE QUESTION

OF TRADE WHERE WE CAN START RAISING THAT ISSUE.

I JUST WANT TO SAY HOW PROPHETIC THAT SOUTH PARK MOVIE

WAS, BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE THAT WAR WITH CANADA WITH

ERIC CARTMAN AS PRESIDENT.

AND IT MAKES NO SENSE, BECAUSE MOST

OF THE THINGS TRUMP DOES MAKE NO SENSE EXCEPT TO HIM, SO I FEEL

LIKE THIS IS A SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PATHOLOGY THAT

HAPPENING WHERE HE WANTS TO ISOLATE HIMSELF FROM EVERYONE

AND EVERYTHING.

OBVIOUSLY WE NEED INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS TO

INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS, ONE OF THE THINGS THIS HURTS THE MOST

IS THE UNITED STATES SOLAR INDUSTRY WHICH IS ALREADY A 30%

TARIFF ON SOLAR PANELS, WE NEED CHINESE SOLAR PANELS TO SOLVE

THE GLOBAL PROBLEM OF CLIMATE CHANGE, AND OF COURSE TRUMP HAS

UNILATERALLY WITHDRAWN US FROM THE PARIS ACCORDS AS WELL.

I

THINK HE LIKES TO ACT ON HIS OWN EVEN IF IT IS IN NO ONE'S

INTERESTS, JUST TO MAKE TROUBLE.

AND WHAT IS UNFORTUNATE THIS

WEEK IS THAT IT MAKES JUSTIN BIEBER -- I MEAN JUSTIN TRUDEAU

-- LOOK GOOD AT A TIME WHEN HE JUST NATIONALIZED THE CANADIAN

TAR SANDS PIPELINES AND BECAME AN OIL TYCOON, AND SHOULDN'T

LOOK GOOD ABOUT ANYTHING RIGHT NOW.

THE WHOLE INTERNATIONAL

COMMUNITY SHOULD BE COMING TOGETHER TO ROUNDLY CONDEMN

JUSTIN TRUDEAU'S ACTION AGAINST PIPELINE ACTIVISTS, AGAINST THE

ENVIRONMENT, AGAINST FIRST NATIONS IN CANADA THAT THOSE

PIPELINES ARE GOING TO RUN THROUGH THEIR TERRITORIES, AND

NOBODY WANTS THAT EXCEPT FOR THE OIL INDUSTRY.

SO RIGHT NOW IT'S

A MASSIVE DISTRACTION FROM SOMETHING THAT JUSTIN TRUDEAU

DID THAT IS REALLY HORRIBLE.

I WANT EVERYBODY TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE THINGS

ARE NON-BINARY, LIKE EITHER YOU SAY YES TO THE CORPORATE TRADE

DEALS OR YOU SAY LET'S DO A TRADE WAR.

THOSE AREN'T YOUR

ONLY TWO OPTIONS, AND IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IF THE PRESIDENT IS

INTELLIGENT OR NOT, OR CARES ABOUT YOUR INTERESTS ARE NOT.

I

THINK JOE IS EXACTLY RIGHT, THERE IS A WAY TO NEGOTIATE

THESE DEALS THAT IS BETTER FOR YOU GUYS.

SO WHEN TRUMP SAID

THAT ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL IT MADE SENSE, AND IT APPEALED TO

PEOPLE BECAUSE THEIR WAGES ARE SO LOW AND THEY SAW THEIR JOBS

BEING SHIPPED OUT.

I ALWAYS GO BACK TO NICK SMITH, HE'S THE GUY

WE INTERVIEWED, LOCAL ORGANIZER, COMES FROM A COAL MINING FAMILY

IN WEST VIRGINIA, STARTS THE INTERVIEW DURING THE 2016

CAMPAIGN BY SAYING I AIN'T NOTHING BUT A WHITE TRASH

HILLBILLY FROM THE HOLLER BUT HERE'S WHAT I KNOW.

HE SAYS AT

LEAST TRUMP HAD THE DECENCY TO LIE TO US, THE CORPORATE

DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG THERE IS NO HOPE FOR YOU,

IT'S ALL STATUS QUO, WE ARE GIVING EVERYTHING TO THE

CORPORATIONS -- AND BY THE WAY, DON'T GET ME WRONG, CORPORATE

REPUBLICANS FULLY AGREE -- SO THIS IS THE ONE ISSUE, NOT ON

RACISM, NOT ON ANYTHING ELSE, THE ONE ISSUE THEY STAND UP TO

TRUMP ON.

THEY SAY WAIT A MINUTE, MY CORPORATE DONORS ALSO

WANT UNFETTERED TRADE, THAT IS TRADE DEALS ORGANIZED AND

WRITTEN BY CORPORATIONS, BECAUSE THAT IS THE DONORS FOR CORPORATE

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS.

SO IF YOU ARE ANGRY AT THIS TALISMAN

YOU ARE RIGHT, UNFORTUNATELY WE WENT THE WRONG DIRECTION TO TAKE

OUT THAT ANGER BECAUSE NOW YOU WON'T GET ANY HELP, YOUR

PRODUCTS WILL BE MORE EXPENSIVE, AND YOU AREN'T GOING TO GET YOUR

JOBS BACK, AND WE ARE GOING TO START A TRADE WAR.

INSTEAD OF

SAYING HEY, INSTEAD OF THE CORPORATIONS WRITING THOSE

DEALS, WHY DON'T THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA AND

THE EUROPEAN UNION RIGHT THOSE DEALS WHERE WE ACTUALLY CARE

ABOUT EACH OTHER'S WORKERS AND LIFT UP THOSE STANDARDS TOGETHER

INSTEAD OF FIGHTING EACH OTHER SENSELESSLY AND DRIVING UP

PRICES AND LOSING JOBS.

WOULDN'T IT BE AMAZING IF AT THE SAME TIME THAT WE ARE

HELPING TO USE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN OUR WORKERS AND WORKERS

IN VIETNAM OR CHINA OR WHEREVER TO RAISE THEM UP TO OUR LEVEL,

IF THE E.U.

COULD ALSO ELBOW US A LITTLE BIT TO GET OUR WORKERS RIGHTS

UP TO THEIRS.

EVENTUALLY THE VIETNAMESE WILL BE LIKE, YOU GUYS HAVE TO HELP

YOUR WORKERS.

UNFORTUNATELY WE MIGHT GET TO THAT POINT.

THERE'S A BIGGER ISSUE HERE THAT IS FASCINATING, BECAUSE

WHEN YOU DO THIS, IT'S CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A

FREE MARKET.

YOU KNOW, ALL THESE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES

FOR YEARS, OH, THE FREE MARKET, THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE TO HAVE --

NO, OUR ECONOMY IS CREATED, IT'S CREATED BY OUR TAX POLICIES,

IT'S CREATED BY THE WAYS THAT WE ENCOURAGE CORPORATIONS TO JUST

BASICALLY EXTRACT THINGS OUT OF THE EARTH AND THEN RAPE AND

PILLAGE THE ENVIRONMENT AND DO THAT WITHOUT ACTUALLY ANY KIND

OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON THE BOTTOM LINE.

BUT WHAT THIS SHOWS

IS THAT YOU COULD USE GOVERNMENT POLICY TO ACTUALLY CREATE BETTER

THINGS FOR WORKING PEOPLE, BETTER THINGS FOR POOR PEOPLE,

BETTER THINGS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.

INSTEAD THIS IS A

WEIRD LASHING OUT THAT TRUMP ALWAYS DOES, BUT IT POINTS OUT

THE FACT THAT WHAT A LOT OF PEOPLE, ROBERT REICH AND OTHERS

HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR MANY YEARS, THERE IS NO FREE MARKET.

OUR

ECONOMIES ARE RIGGED, AND THEY ARE RIGGED TO BENEFIT THE

WEALTHIEST AMONG US, AND WE COULD IN FACT INTERVENE IN THE

WAY THAT CAPITALISM WORKS AND DO IT IN ALL SORTS OF WAYS THAT

WOULD HELP PEOPLE, BUT WE DO IT IN WAYS THAT HURT MOST PEOPLE.

IN THIS CASE WITH TRUMP.

BUT IT SHOWS THAT THE PHILOSOPHY OF

NEVER TOUCH THE FREE MARKET IS A COMPLETE LIE, AND HAS BEEN FOR

DECADES.

WHAT IS WORSE IS THAT THE ONLY TIME DEMOCRATS AND

REPUBLICANS WANT TO TOUCH THE FREE MARKETS ARE WHEN COMPANIES

NEED HELP.

BUT WHEN WORKERS NEED HELP, FORGET IT.

OR JUST PEOPLE.

THIS ISN'T GOING TO HURT JUST POOR PEOPLE

IN AMERICA, IT WILL HURT POOR PEOPLE IN THOSE COUNTRIES WHEN

ALUMINUM CAN PRICES GO UP AND THE BASIC PRICES OF ALL THESE

GOODS GO UP.

FOR THE POOREST PEOPLE IN AMERICA IT WILL BE AN

EXTRA TAX ON THOSE FOLKS, BECAUSE FREE, UNFETTERED

CAPITALISM ALSO HURTS PEOPLE IN OTHER WAYS.

OF COURSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS UNFETTERED CAPITALISM,

ADAM SMITH TALKED ABOUT HOW YOU NEED REGULATION OF COURSE, YOU

CAN'T HAVE MONOPOLIES OTHERWISE THAT WOULD COME INTO EFFECT

RIGHT AWAY.

ANYONE WHO HAS EVER STUDIED ECONOMIC SYSTEMS KNOWS

THAT, AND IT'S JUST MARKETING BY THEM.

IN FACT WE DON'T HAVE

UNFETTERED CAPITALISM OR ANYWHERE NEAR IT RIGHT NOW

PARTLY BECAUSE WE HAVE GIGANTIC CRONY CAPITALISM, SO THE TOP 200

CORPORATE GIVERS INTO POLITICS RECEIVE BACK $4.4 TRILLION IN

SUBSIDIES.

WHERE IS YOUR FREE MARKETS?

THERE ARE NO FREE

MARKETS, THEY BUY OUR POLITICIANS THROUGH PRIVATE

FINANCING OF ELECTIONS AND THEN THEY HAVE CRONY CAPITALISM WHERE

THE WEALTHY GET MORE WEALTHY AND THE POWERFUL GET MORE POWERFUL

AND THE REST OF US SUFFER, AND THEN THEY BRING IN A CLOWN FROM

A REALITY SHOW TO DISTRACT YOU AND DO SOME JUGGLING AND SAY I

STARTED A TRADE WAR, THAT SOUNDS TOUGH, IT WON'T HELP YOU AT ALL,

BUT ARE YOU DISTRACTED ENOUGH?

AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW.

For more infomation >> Canada Slaps Tariffs On US In Response To Trump - Duration: 15:27.

-------------------------------------------

US in FORCEFUL warning to Beijing over South China Sea as WW3 fears grow - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:08.

US in FORCEFUL warning to Beijing over South China Sea as WW3 fears grow

BEIJING'S actions in the South China Sea are "intimidating" and the Pentagon will

"compete vigorously" if needed, US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has said.

The comments by Mattis, speaking at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, come at

a time of increased tension between the two nations in the South China Sea.

"China's policy in the South China Sea stands in stark contrast to the openness that our

strategy promotes, it calls into question China's broader goals," said Mattis, who said

he would be travelling to Beijing this month.

"The US will continue to pursue a constructive, results-oriented relationship with China,

cooperation whenever possible will be the name of the game and competing vigorously

where we must," he added.

Last month, China's air force landed bombers on disputed islands and reefs in the South

China Sea as part of a training exercise, triggering concern from Vietnam and the Philippines.

Satellite photographs taken on May 12 showed China appeared to have deployed truck-mounted

surface-to-air missiles or anti-ship cruise missiles at Woody Island in the disputed sea.

"Despite China's claims to the contrary, the placement of these weapon systems is tied

directly to military use for the purposes of intimidation and coercion," Mattis said.

Two US Navy warships sailed near South China Sea islands claimed by China on Sunday.

It came at a particularly sensitive time and just days after the Pentagon withdrew an invitation

to China for a major US-hosted naval drill.

China's state-run Global Times newspaper said in an editorial tension in the South China

Sea was "due to the US continuing to increase its military presence in the region, forcing

China to naturally upgrade its defensive weapons on the islands".

"This in turn gives the U.S. more excuses to exert military pressure, causing regional

tensions to spiral," it said.

Mattis acknowledged that China's militarisation of islands was a reality but warned of further

consequences.

"I believe there are much larger consequences in the future when nations lose the rapport

of their neighbours ... eventually these (actions) do not pay off," Mattis said.

He also reiterated that the Pentagon was committed to working with Taiwan for its defence, comments

that are likely to anger China.

China's hostility towards self-ruled Taiwan has grown since Tsai Ing-wen from the pro-independence

Democratic Progressive Party won presidential elections on the island in 2016.

China claims Taiwan as its own and it is one of its most sensitive issues.

For more infomation >> US in FORCEFUL warning to Beijing over South China Sea as WW3 fears grow - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

Watch: U.S. Allies Denounce President Trump's Tariffs Decision | NYT News - Duration: 1:38.

"We don't have good trade deals."

"Nafta is the worst trade deal maybe ever signed."

"Do we make any good deals anymore?"

"Let me be clear.

These tariffs are totally unacceptable.

The American administration has made a decision today

that we deplore and obviously is

going to lead to retaliatory measures, as it must."

"There were different scenarios,

but obviously today, unfortunately, the worst case

scenario was presented,

which is imposing tariffs on your allies."

"I regret the protectionist decision of the U.S. administration

on steel and aluminum.

I'm hoping that it will be possible to avoid

an escalation, because we don't want to have a trade war.

We want to have a real dialogue with the U.S.

But again, I regret such a decision."

For more infomation >> Watch: U.S. Allies Denounce President Trump's Tariffs Decision | NYT News - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea summit is back on, President Donald Trump hits U.S. allies with metal tariffs - Duration: 21:02.

ROBERT COSTA: It's back on. President Trump will head to Singapore to meet with the

North Korean leader. I'm Robert Costa. We discuss the diplomatic drama and what it

means, and new tariffs spark trade tensions, tonight on Washington Week.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) And I have never said it happens in one meeting.

You're talking about years of hostility, years of problems, years of really hatred.

And I told him today, take your time. We can go fast. We can go slowly.

ROBERT COSTA: A week after canceling a summit with North Korea, President Trump

announces the on-again, off-again meeting with Kim Jong-un is back on.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) We'll be meeting on June 12th in Singapore.

ROBERT COSTA: Both the president and the secretary of state say they are confident talks

with North Korea over nuclear weapons are moving in the right direction. We report on

the latest twist in the high-stakes negotiations. Plus, economic uncertainty as the

U.S. slaps new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Europe, Canada, and Mexico.

We discuss it all with Peter Baker of The New York Times, Andrea Mitchell of NBC News,

and Shawna Thomas of VICE News.

ANNOUNCER: This is Washington Week. Once again, from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Good evening. Just one week after abruptly canceling a meeting with North

Korean leader Kim Jong-un, President Trump announced the June 12th summit is a go.

On Friday he met with North Korea's former spy chief, Kim Yong-chol, at the White House.

The huddle was the culmination of this week's developments.

Days earlier, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo hosted a dinner with Chol and other North

Korean officials in New York to continue the rapid-fire diplomacy that began almost as

soon as the president pulled out of the planned summit last week.

Today the president lowered expectations even as he expressed optimism to reporters.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) I have never said it goes in one meeting. I think it's

going to be a process. But the relationships are building, and that's a very positive thing.

ROBERT COSTA: Peter, let's just get into this. He's talking about the beginning of a process.

If this is just the start of a long process, what does success look like on June 12th?

PETER BAKER: Yeah, that's a great question. We're no longer looking at June 12th as

the breakthrough moment. Now we're looking at it as a get-to-know-you-plus meeting.

That's what he called it.

And, look, they were trying to downplay expectations because I think it's become clear to

them, especially in this last week as things kind of blew up and were put back together,

that there's no such thing as a straight line when it comes to North Korea, and they did

not want to have the expectations so high that when they came out of Singapore without a

document that seemed to be a solution to everything that it looked like a failure.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, what about - what document could come out of this?

It may not be denuclearization commitments from North Korea, but the president mentioned

there could be an end to the long Korean War.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Indeed, and I think one interim step might be establishing interest

sections. That would not be a full embassy, it would not be an end to the war yet -

although he did certainly tee that up - but it could be the beginning of steps toward

that. And interest sections would be a big deal because we have no real visibility in

Pyongyang. And interest sections would be what we had with Cuba for all those decades,

where you can do spying. You can do everything that you can do at an embassy, except

have formal recognition. So it would give us a window into what they are doing, a much

easier way to verify whether they're complying, and also they would have a window into

Washington, which they clearly have because we're a much more transparent society.

ROBERT COSTA: What do you make of Secretary Pompeo? He's the one in the Oval Office

with the president. It's not National Security Advisor John Bolton.

The hawks are not driving this process. It's Pompeo; it's the president himself.

SHAWNA THOMAS: I think what's interesting about that is, you know, in some ways the

State Department should be taking the lead on this.

If we were doing a more normal process of this kind of negotiation, a lot of what we've

seen in this back and forth would have happened behind closed doors, it usually isn't

this publicized, but it would be the State Department trying to figure out what does

denuclearization mean? Are we speaking the same language? Are we doing that?

I actually think it's a somewhat - even though Pompeo is pretty much a hawk as well -

it's a somewhat good thing that the guy who's in charge of the State Department is the

one who's, in some ways, representing America in that room along with President Trump.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And in fact, Bolton - John Bolton, the national security advisor, was

noticeably absent. There were some indications that he might be there today.

He was not in the Oval Office. He was nowhere to be seen. And it is, I'm told,

exactly because - precisely because he spoke of the Libyan model, almost derailed

this whole meeting. So did Mike Pence, and he was not in the room. It was just

John Kelly and, importantly, Pompeo, as Shawna says. He's the point man here.

He has street cred with the president because he was the CIA briefer for 17 months before

30 days ago, approximately, he became the secretary of state. So he is a hardliner,

but he is also very invested in this. And I think he has correctly taken stock of the

president's interest in legacy. There are political implications for this.

He's going to do something that no other president has been able to do.

And if they can verify it, and if he now has a lowered expectation that it's going to

take a while - it's not going to be one summit or two or three.

He might stay longer in Singapore. He's certainly indicated that - than one day.

He might be able to do something that Barack Obama certainly never achieved, or even

really attempted, that George W. Bush tried and failed at, and that Bill Clinton,

most importantly, tried and failed to achieve.

ROBERT COSTA: So not having Bolton in the room, that's a big signal. So's when the

president said we didn't talk about human rights. That's an issue so many past

American presidents have talked about with North Korea. What are the signals, though,

that Kim Jong-un is sending? He's sending his top guy in Kim Yong-chol to talk to the

president. What has he done, though, to show any kind of commitment to these talks?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, I think sending his top guy is one way. I think the fact that

he - it still seems that they are talking, that you have a team of people who is in

Singapore still going through the process of trying to figure out what actually happens

on June 12th. And I also find it interesting that even though last week we all got into

a frenzy and President Trump said, you know, he's not going to actually go to the summit,

he sent the letter, that whole thing, it seems like behind the scenes people just kind

of kept going, which they needed to do if you were going to try to make June 12th work.

PETER BAKER: But the president said two things today - several things today, but two

things in particular that were notable and different, right? You played one of them,

this will be a process, not right away. He's sending a signal, take your time.

He specifically even said those words. I said those words, take your time.

A week ago they were saying it had to be rapid denuclearization, it had - it could not be

extended over time. It's a big change.

The other thing was I don't even like to use the phrase "maximum pressure" he said.

Well, that is his phrase for his strategy of economic and diplomatic isolation of North

Korea. What he's signaling is, in effect, we may not be taking sanctions off, but

we're really maybe not going to be enforcing the ones we've got on all that

vigorously. It's letting up a little bit of the pressure.

And that's seen by some experts as a significant concession.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, what's driving Kim Jong-un at this moment, though? Is it China

pushing him to the table? Is it the sanctions that are crippling his economy?

What's putting him to give the letter to Kim Yong-chol to drive this moment?

PETER BAKER: By most accounts he wants to bring his backwards country into at least a

little bit more of an economic, you know, prosperous place. You see the satellite

photos with the North completely dark while China and South Korea are lit at night.

There is such deprivation in that place. And he seems - according to people who are

smarter about this than I am - to be concerned about finally trying to bring it out

of that backwards area. And the nuclear weapons program is his playing card.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And one of the things to remember here is that Kim Yong-chol was a real

enemy, an adversary. He's still sanctioned. He had to get special permission to

even set foot in the United States, and then to come to Washington.

The visit is in sharp contrast to the only previous visit at this level in the Oval

Office, which was with Bill Clinton in October of 2000, setting up Madeleine Albright's

trip 10 days later. It was the red carpet today. It was the South Portico.

It was photographers and reporters positioned to catch the glimpse of them walking down

the colonnade, the Oval Office -

SHAWNA THOMAS: Shaking hands afterwards. That's - yeah.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Shaking hands, pictures released. And then the respect of walking

him out to his motorcade, taking still photos with the rest of his delegation,

posing for pictures, and then praising him so warmly.

ROBERT COSTA: So let's say this - the U.S. is giving Kim respect. As Peter was

saying, they're trying to help him turn on the lights in his own country. What do U.S.

allies, what does the rest of the world say if this meeting happens on June 12th and he

doesn't commit to denuclearization, but he somehow is engaging with the world?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I think - I mean, I think, number one, South Korea and Japan say if he

doesn't commit to denuclearization and also insists on us pulling back from some of our

security that's in that region - like the nuclear umbrella that's over those two

countries - I think they say, you got played, to a certain extent. I think the rest of

the world is just going to sit and watch because they don't want to be played by North

Korea. But in some ways - in some ways this was half a win today, for the North Koreans.

And if that handshake and that photograph happen on June 12th in Singapore, that's almost

a full win for North Korea.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And the South Koreans - President Moon in South Korea is completely

invested in this. He ran on this program. And he, you know, quickly met with Kim Jong-un

this past weekend to put it back together. That was, in fact, a little worrying to

the American side. They thought, well, maybe Moon is too much joining Kim Jong-un.

But the Japanese are very nervous about this.

ROBERT COSTA: And the president seemed a little nervous about Russia's engagement with Kim Jong-un.

SHAWNA THOMAS: That's exactly right.

PETER BAKER: Yeah. He was very peeved that Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey

Lavrov met to meet with Kim Jong-un in North Korea. What was that about?

It seemed to be some sort of a Russian play.

ROBERT COSTA: What was it about?

PETER BAKER: Well, we don't know. But if it's Russia you can assume it wasn't friendly.

I mean, it was not coordinated, clearly, with the United States, and that they have their

own interests in North Korea. They have their own interests in this region.

They have their own interests basically in preventing a win for the United States.

Vladimir Putin sees global diplomacy as a zero-sum game. If we win, that means they lose.

So they tend to muck around in things. The other thing that's interesting about this is

that, you know, this - for the president, one of his strengths and weaknesses, sometimes

the same thing, is his lack of firm commitment to particulars in any policy, right?

He - unlike, say, some of his predecessors who got themselves locked in - we have to have

this, that, or the other thing in order to have a deal - President Trump is very flexible

on stuff like that. He's very capable of creating a deal that doesn't actually comport

with what he had said in the past and doesn't worry that he'll be called out for being

inconsistent. That gives him some flexibility going into a negotiation.

It may or may not be a good deal, but it also means that he may have a greater chance of

coming to the table with something to show for it.

ANDREA MITCHELL: I think that's exactly right. And also Peter's point about what Kim

Jong-un gets out of this, he does want to turn the lights on. And I was in New York

when Secretary Pompeo pointedly showed Kim Yong-chol the vista of the East River, the

skyscrapers. They wanted to show Manhattan. They wanted to show off the White House.

Not as grand as, in fact, the palace that Kim Jong-un inhabits in Pyongyang.

But the rest of the country is just barren. I can't even describe what it was like to

drive from Pyongyang, a number of years ago, down to the DMZ.

And you see these barely arable lands with what looks like feudal Medieval peasants

hoeing with wooden non-mechanized equipment. They have basically nothing.

ROBERT COSTA: The rest of the world is watching very closely as the president deals with

North Korea. They're also watching closely on trade this week. New tariffs President

Trump has imposed on aluminum and steel imported from Europe came about with a new

policy this week. Canada and Mexico are looking at new policies from the U.S.

The move comes from the president as the administration is also pressuring China.

The American allies this week immediately pushed back, threatening retaliation and

measures targeting American products.

The decision is raising concerns, certainly on Capitol Hill.

The president, as you remember, originally imposed the 25 percent tariff on steel and 10

percent on aluminum in March, citing national security concerns, but issued a temporary

exemption for the EU, Canada, and Mexico. That exemption has now expired. Shawna, VICE

News has been talking to voters in the Midwest and other places around the country.

We always think about trade sometimes in Washington as something that's being negotiated

among the power players, but how is it affecting those who are out in the country running

businesses, running farms?

SHAWNA THOMAS: Well, we - a couple weeks ago, back in March actually, when we were in

Illinois for another story, we talked with a farmer. He's a Trump supporter.

Has a farm that has a lot of dairy cows and a couple of other things.

And one of the things he said that we found to be really interesting is that he still

supported President Trump despite the fact that there was this, like, are we going to get

these more tariffs from China, are we going to get more tariffs from the EU, that whole thing.

But he was able to sort of basically convince himself that President Trump has a master

plan; he probably doesn't realize how this affects farmers, so people need to tell him

how it affects farmers; but once he finds that out and once we all see what the plan is,

things will be fine, and stay on President Trump's side.

And I think it's interesting how no matter what he does, if you support him you are able

to sort of comport his actions into something that is believable that is supporting you.

ROBERT COSTA: So is that what's keeping the president plowing forward in such an

aggressive way, he knows some of his base is going to stick with him - he had good jobs

numbers on Friday for the U.S. economy - even though some

of his advisors, some Republicans, are saying, hey, hold off?

PETER BAKER: No, that's right, even Republicans who are normally very deferential to him

are saying this is going to actually hurt us. All the things you're bragging about in

terms of the economy now are at risk if you get us into a sustained and escalating kind

of trade war. It's a very interesting moment for the Republican Party because their

orthodoxy has been for decades free trade, free trade. And I think what you're saying

is right. I mean, we have focused so much in recent years on the losers in free trade -

and there are losers of free trade - and their stories have captivated politicians

like President Trump and like many, many Democrats, but if you flip that around

there are a lot of winners in free trade too. And if they suddenly become losers,

it will be interesting to see how that changes the political dynamics.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And I was interviewing some farmers from Wisconsin who were on Capitol

Hill lobbying to prevent this from happening.

They are really getting killed by it and are very concerned about the NAFTA negotiations,

which had reached a critical point and had succeeded in the last couple of days.

Pressure by this administration had gotten Mexico and Canada back to the table to

renegotiate NAFTA, they came up with a deal, and then it got blown up - by Vice President

Pence is the argument from Canada, Justin Trudeau furious at this personal slam that -

statement that came out from the White House against Canada last night.

ROBERT COSTA: His statement in response, Andrea, was - he said Canada has been America's

most - one of America's most steadfast allies, served along America in two world wars,

the Korean War; we have to believe that sometime their common sense will prevail.

Powerful words from the prime minister.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Yeah, and they were in Afghanistan, they were elsewhere, they are NATO

allies, and there is so much anger.

And you talk to cranberry growers in Massachusetts, yes, that's a - that's a Democratic

state, it's a blue state, but I think throughout the Midwest you're going to hear real

pushback. The auto industry is going to get killed by this. So we should be hitting at

China for its unfair trade practices, but we're really blowing ourselves up is the argument.

ROBERT COSTA: But are we going to see pushback? Because Democrats seem to be

trying to steal back this populist trade pitch from President Trump.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Well, I think - I think as we get closer and closer, and if this trade

war actually becomes a trade war, you will.

I mean, I think one of the points - and probably your guys in Wisconsin and my guys in

Illinois said this - is that - when we were there, even just the conversation around

NAFTA and the threat of these tariffs, he was like, I have lost money today. So it

wasn't that I'm going to lose money in five months; he was like, I look at my fields,

I know what I've planned, I've already lost money because of the threats of these tariffs.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Keep your eye on the auto industry. That's the Midwest. That's where

this election was won and lost by the Democrats, and they are really going to be hit hard.

ROBERT COSTA: What about inside of the White House, Peter?

We talk about Bolton with North Korea, him not being in the room says a lot. On trade

you have Peter Navarro, this nationalist trade advisor inside of the White House,

really pushing the administration to be - take a harder stance on China and on the EU.

PETER BAKER: Well, he has, and they're very divided on this. You see this basically

every day, this kind of a flip-floppy kind of quality at times to it. Today Secretary

Mnuchin says the trade war is off for now, it's on hold, and the next day suddenly

they're going back wholesale on it. Peter Navarro and Mnuchin are supposedly at odds.

They supposedly have had shouting matches at each other.

And that I think kind of captures sort of this - you know, the dynamics of this

administration, where there really is an ideological divide between, you know,

traditional business-oriented type Republicans who are going along with the president's

concern about trade, but are fundamentally believers in the orthodoxy of the party for

the last couple decades; and then the populist side, the nationalist side that believes

that they've been - the other side has been all wrong going back to the '90s.

ROBERT COSTA: The president said in his comments to reporters before he got in the

helicopter that he wants to cut bilateral deals with Canada, with Mexico, with the EU.

Is this what we should expect in the coming months?

ANDREA MITCHELL: I don't see any chance that Canada is now going to negotiate with the

U.S. bilaterally they are so angry about what has happened. This is a really deeply

painful slam, and you don't treat Canada - his rhetoric against Mexico has been so

profoundly disagreeable. We've seen that. We saw a very sharp statement from Pena

Nieto, the president of Mexico, about the wall because was in Nashville, the president

was, again talking about Mexico paying for the wall, and Pena Nieto immediately tweeted -

SHAWNA THOMAS: No we're not.

ANDREA MITCHELL: - no we're not, and that we're speaking for all of us.

ROBERT COSTA: And the G-7's coming up in Canada.

SHAWNA THOMAS: It's going to be awkward. ANDREA MITCHELL: That is going to be awkward.

PETER BAKER: This is amazing. It's coming up in Canada.

ANDREA MITCHELL: That's next week.

PETER BAKER: Exactly, next week. And the president is going to go up there to

Canada, hosted by Justin Trudeau, and who else is going to be there?

The Germans, the French, the British, and the Japanese, who are also, you know, on the

edge on the steel stuff. I mean, there's a lot of tension coming into that meeting,

and they're already on edge because of the ripping up of the Iran deal.

I mean, Europe and America are at odds about that.

So this is going to be a big, big meeting full of possible tension there.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the EU or the countries within

the EU can't actually just negotiate unilateral deals with us anyway.

PETER BAKER: No.

SHAWNA THOMAS: It is part of their charter that the EU does these things as one solid

bloc. So President Trump might want that, but that's not how the EU operates.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And when he got out of TPP, which was also Hillary Clinton's position,

he got out of TPP and said we're going to have all these - you know, these bilateral

negotiations, none of which has happened.

Meanwhile, China filling in and moving in and making their own deals.

So we've created a huge vacuum at a big disadvantage to American business in Asia.

ROBERT COSTA: And Europe's facing its own problems because you have a new government

coming into Italy, you have the Brexit sentiment still in the U.K.

They're not functioning as a total institutional continent either.

PETER BAKER: No, that's right. Europe is really on the edge because of this

Italian thing, and it's striking that we've heard nothing from the White House

about it, nothing from the administration. In the past we saw, when Bush was

president, when Obama was president and Europe was sort of on the edge, they spoke out.

They at least provided some rhetorical leadership in what they were trying to say. There's

no interest in this, it seems like, in this White House, and that has a huge impact

on them because if Europe suddenly tanks economically that will have a big impact on us.

ROBERT COSTA: Final thoughts on how this plays in the midterms, trade?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I think if you see people in the Midwest who actually feel the pain on

this - because that's what people vote on. They vote on their jobs. They vote on

their money. They vote on whether they can take a vacation with their kids, right?

And so if there are people in the Midwest who thought President Trump was going to bring

them something and they blame him for their farms not making as much money, then I think

Republicans will probably suffer.

ROBERT COSTA: We shall see. SHAWNA THOMAS: Yeah.

ROBERT COSTA: We'll see what happens. As President Trump would say, we'll see what

happens. Thanks, everybody. We have to leave you a few minutes early tonight so

you can support your local PBS station. They truly support Washington Week.

We thank you and them. Our conversation will continue online on the Washington

Week Extra, where we will talk about Puerto Rico's recovery and presidential pardons.

You can find that later tonight at PBS.org/WashingtonWeek.

I'm Robert Costa. Enjoy your weekend.

For more infomation >> North Korea summit is back on, President Donald Trump hits U.S. allies with metal tariffs - Duration: 21:02.

-------------------------------------------

THE U S TRIED TO DETONATE AN ATOM BOMB ON THE MOON - Duration: 4:43.

THE U.S. TRIED TO DETONATE AN ATOM BOMB ON THE MOON � BUT THERE WAS AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL

RESPONSE� ARJUN WALIA.

In the 1950s, Colonel Ross Dedrickson was responsible for maintaining the inventory

of the nuclear weapon stockpile for the AEC, and for accompanying security teams checking

out the security of the weapons, among many other duties.

As his obituary states:

He was assigned to the US Atomic Energy Commission.

A long service with the Energy Commission between 1950-1958 included, contract administration

duties at Nevada test sites, Pacific Nuclear Test Area west of Hawaii, nuclear weapon manufacturing

and quality assurance in Albuquerque, and inspection of nuclear and non-nuclear facilities

throughout the country.

He served with the 5th Air Force in Japan and later as a ranking Colonel, Officer in

Charge of the Pacific Unified Command (TM)s alternate �command and control center�

in Hawaii.

In 1962, he was transferred and served as Deputy for Material for the 832 Air Division

at Canon Air Force Base, Clovis, New Mexico.

He retired from the USAF in 1964.

He is one of hundreds of military whistleblowers with verified backgrounds to have been brought

forth by Dr. Steven Greer�s Disclosure Project.

His testimony about UFOs � specifically about UFOs and nuclear weapons � can be

corroborated by a wealth of information and evidence that�s now available within the

public domain.

(To read more about a few of these encounters, click here.)

Many of these whistleblowers have made multiple appearances at the National Press Club in

an effort to get this information out to the world, with the most recent example being

the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure, which took place a few years ago.

With such a professional background, working in the places he has worked, it�s safe to

infer he was privy to sensitive information on a number of subjects.

This isn�t just a random high-ranking military whistleblower talking about a random issue.

There are many whistleblowers and documents clearly outlining a decades-long relationship

between UFOs and nuclear storage facilities and test sites.

A number of these incidents have visual confirmation, along with air and ground radar confirmation

as well.

Related CE Article: This Is What Happens When A UFO Is Tracked On Military Radar

In the interview below, Dedrickson explains how the American government tried to detonate

a nuclear weapon on the moon, but were prevented from doing so.

As far as the mainstream goes, it�s public knowledge that a declassified report by the

Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center from June 1959 shows just how seriously they considered

the plan, called Project A119.

In general, they wanted to investigate the capability of weapons in space, as well as

gain further insight into the space environment and the detonation of nuclear devices within

it.

As far as the information below, that probably goes deeper into the Black Budget.

It�s interesting how the world is so into television shows like Stranger Things, which

depicts the Department of Energy and their involvement with otherworldly creatures and

other strange facts, yet so willing to ignore a high ranking American Colonel who held very

sensitive positions at the Department of Energy for years, at a time when all of this nuclear

development was really hot.

He is the real deal and it�s interesting to ponder what he might really know.

�I also learned about incidents involving nuclear weapons, and among these incidents

were a couple of nuclear weapons sent into space were destroyed by the extraterrestrials.

. . . At the very end of the 70s and the early 80s, we attempted to put a nuclear weapon

on the moon and explode it for scientific measurements and other things, which was not

acceptable to the extraterrestrials.

They destroyed the weapon before it got to the moon.�

For more infomation >> THE U S TRIED TO DETONATE AN ATOM BOMB ON THE MOON - Duration: 4:43.

-------------------------------------------

Loud Dobbs & Sebastian Gorka:US-NOKO summit on JUNE 12 - Duration: 10:55.

good evening everybody our top stories President Trump says the Singapore

summit is on after hosting North Korea's top diplomat at the White House today

President Trump says real progress is being made but the president cautions

everyone that that June 12th Singapore summit could be only the first of what

will be many meetings to be held between the two leaders they want it we think

it's important and I think we would be making a big mistake if we didn't have

it I think we're going to have a relationship and it will start on June

12 we'll take up the president's efforts to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula and

to bring North Korea into the global community of nations dr. Sebastian Gorka

among our guests here tonight also tonight how about that Trump economy

just keeps getting stronger and stronger the latest job numbers show unemployment

at an 18-year low and that has dims and rhinos running scared five months ahead

of the midterm elections and those establishment rhinos Ryan and McConnell

are sweating profusely wringing their hands they're near tears that President

Trump just keeps winning and winning we take up the political implications with

the Dean himself Ed Rollins and the national left-wing media brimming with

hacks and activists and mediocrities the mundane and the inane working tirelessly

to support the profane foul-mouthed Samantha bee holding on to her job while

Roseanne Barr is ousted by big entertainment diamond and silk here to

talk about the efforts of Hollywood the National left-wing media and corporate

America to silence conservatives our top story tonight President Trump says the

June 12 Singapore summit with Kim jong-un is back on president Trump made

the announcement after his historic meeting with President Kim's envoy Kim

Jung Cheol at the White House Fox News House correspondent Kevin cork with our

report loo good evening I think it's probably going to be a very successful

meeting that's what we heard from President Trump at the conclusion of

today's meeting with North Korean officials he also told us to pack our

bags the trip is on the meeting is on the summit is on but June 12th in

Singapore now no surprise here this was a rare gathering at the White House

between leaders from Washington and Pyongyang in fact first time in nearly

two decades a top official from the Hermit Kingdom has actually come here

and now what began as an expected delivery of a letter from Kim jong-un

and perhaps a brief visit morphed into this 80 minute discussion of a wide

range of topics from denuclearization to security to sanctions and a whole lot

more now the President as you can well imagine I was asked about a number of

different things like might he do something about sanctions what about the

so-called maximum pressure campaign the president said a lot but most notably he

warned everybody to tamp down expectations because this is only a

first step we're going to be June 12th we'll be in Singapore it'll be a

beginning I don't say and I've never said it happens in one meeting you took

in about years of hostility years of problems

years of really hatred between so many different nations but I think you're

gonna have a very positive result now it is also fair to point out Lou that the

US has to be sober about this pending summit with the North Koreans after all

we have seen them say all the right things previously in fact they've made a

number of promises previously only to break them each and every one in fact I

don't have to go very far back in history I can take you back to some

pictures we have from October of 2000 you remember that big meeting that the

North Koreans had with then President Bill Clinton well unfortunately for them

for us and for the entire world you see where that got us nowhere because the

North Koreans reneged on the deal so say folks here at the White House now as you

can also imagine we are eager to get a readout of that letter that the

president talked about receiving from the North Koreans as soon as I get when

I promise you I will pass it along but for now back to you Lou Kevin we await

we await your update thanks so much Kevin cork from the White House joining

me now to take up the declaration today by the president that there will be a

June 12 summit after all in Singapore dr. Sebastian Gorka Fox News national

security strategist former strategist to president Trump good to have you with us

tonight sub and president Trump is not only it appears accomplishing the

impossible but doing so at an unprecedented speed warp speed that

summit will actually begin if it is to happen on the 12th 11 days from tonight

what yeah it's truly stunning Lou remember how diplomacy was done before

the age of Trump in the end secretary Pompeo if a decision like this had been

taken to cancel the summit previously then the talks and the negotiations and

the meetings in Vienna and Geneva would have taken a year or a year and a half

to get back on track it would have taken two weeks it would have taken two weeks

just for Kerry to get his bicycles to Singapore right right and and the

president announces the cancellation it's a tough letter but he leaves that

window open he says look this is important for all of us so if you

want to send me a letter write me a letter and within a couple of days that

letter is hand-delivered to the Oval Office and the president walks out and

says let's do this I mean it's it's we've never seen this before in

diplomacy it's stunning and of course percolating along the way is the the

foundation work of a lot of career diplomats working to get to get this on

exactly the right footing and see that the conditions that the president is

laid out are met every step of the way preceding that summit the president

while being very cautious seems also very assured that the North Koreans are

meeting the markers at least to this point well look I have to say he's got

the right man heading the State Department to have somebody who was

running and reforming the CIA for over a year who made these connections to the

highest levels of that regime then transform over to the State Department

to become the chief negotiator he knows where the problems are he knows about

weapons regimes inspection regimes and I think said you would agree there is no

one within this administration who knows more about the State Department about

our history and international relations and with the North Koreans and every

other every other country in the world then john bolton the national security

adviser and i think it's interesting we haven't seen hide nor hair of

ambassador bolton why he is working obviously in the trenches and laying the

groundwork and doing everything he can to assure this president success he and

his brand-new chief of staff Fred flights they know exactly the games

North Korea's played for the last 30 years they know exactly what to look for

there I'm sure they're working hand in glove with Mike Pompeo and his new team

and they rest assured if this some it actually

happens Lou it will be a very serious regime they put in place yeah you know

it's it's it's an exciting prospect obviously for the world as the president

has said ie it is a it should be an exciting prospect for Kim jong-un and

the North Koreans we also know that you know like the Scorpion in the tortoise

nature is a very strong strong element to overcome now we'll see whether or not

this president will determine whether or not that scorpion can overcome its

nature Sebastian Gorka is always good to have

you with us thanks so much thank you - my pleasure

appreciate dr. Sebastian Gorka up next today's jobs numbers so good the Dems

can't stand it and Rollins on the midterms the numbers the Trump economy

no yes the dims the deep state and the left

they are just apoplectic this man keeps winning see there fella he said he would

win and win are you tired yet no nobody is Ed Rollins here next stay with us

you

you

For more infomation >> Loud Dobbs & Sebastian Gorka:US-NOKO summit on JUNE 12 - Duration: 10:55.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Close to Imposing Sanctions on European Companies in Russian Pipeline Project - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 5:09.

U.S. Close to Imposing Sanctions on European Companies in Russian Pipeline Project

The decision would test already fraught relations with Germany, other allies.

The Trump administration is edging closer to imposing sanctions on energy companies

from Germany and other European countries in a bid to scuttle the construction of a

politically contentious Russian gas pipeline across the Baltic, according to three sources

familiar with the issue.

Officials are still looking at other ways to block to project, known as Nord Stream

2, a natural gas pipeline project meant to bring Russian gas into the heart of Europe.

But key figures in the administration now view sanctions as an increasingly likely option.

The measure would add yet more tension to the relationship between the United States

and Germany, where officials are already fuming over President Donald Trump's punitive moves

on trade, his decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, and other issues.

"They will stop at nothing to block Nord Stream," one of the sources said, referring

to members of the Trump White House.

Successive administrations opposed the pipeline since it was first broached in 2015, fearing

it would undercut Ukraine in its lucrative middle-man position for energy flows between

Russia and Europe.

Congress passed a bill last summer making sanctions possible.

Many Central and Eastern European countries also oppose the project, which they fear will

tighten Moscow's energy stranglehold on Europe by doubling the amount of natural gas

that flows directly from Russia to Germany.

The State Department would not respond directly to the matter but said companies working on

the project were doing so at their own peril.

"We have been clear that firms working in the Russian energy export pipeline sector

are engaging in a line of business that carries sanctions risk," a State Department spokeswoman

said.

Trump has complained that Berlin is spending billions of dollars on the pipeline while

refusing to earmark more money for defense.

(In fact, the cost of the project would be borne by private companies, not public funds.)

He has also criticized Germany repeatedly for its trade practices.

The friction was apparent during German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas's visit to Washington

last week, which included tense exchanges between officials from both sides — over

the Iran nuclear deal, trade, and the Nord Stream project.

National Security Advisor John Bolton and other top U.S. officials see the project as

a threat to the United States and European security and are determined to stop it, the

source said.

"Everything is on the table.

… The administration is taking a whole of government approach to stopping the Nord Stream

project."

In response to a query, a National Security Council spokesman said the administration

wanted to reduce Russian economic leverage over Europe.

"There is consensus across the U.S. government that Nord Stream 2 deepens this dependence

at a time when Russia's activities have become increasingly dangerous and unpredictable,"

the spokesman said.

One of the officials leading the push for sanctions is Wess Mitchell, the assistant

secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs.

He raised the issue repeatedly on a visit to Europe in recent weeks, according to U.S.

diplomats and one former senior U.S. official.

Congress passed strict sanctions legislation on Russia last summer in part to tie Trump's

hands on policy toward the Kremlin.

But until recently the White House had downplayed the need for more economic sanctions over

the pipeline.

"If the White House is serious now about targeting Nord Stream 2, that would be a remarkable

change," said Tim Boersma, an energy expert at Columbia University's Center on Global

Energy Policy.

Boersma suggested that unraveling U.S.-European relations in recent months might account for

the shift in the White House's approach to Russia's big energy project.

The sanctions would affect several companies, including Wintershall Holding and Uniper of

Germany; Engie of France; Royal Dutch Shell, an Anglo-Dutch oil company; and Austria's

OMV.

Nord Stream 2 has secured nearly all the permits it needs for the $11 billion project from

countries around the Baltic.

"Certainly, the only one who can stop Nord Stream 2 now is the United States via sanctions,"

said one European diplomat who works on energy issues.

"If there is no dramatic step from the U.S. government, Nord Stream 2 will be built."

Opposition to Nord Stream has been one of the Trump administration's few consistently

anti-Russia positions since it took office, though opposition has been stronger at the

State Department than in the White House.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét