Thứ Bảy, 30 tháng 6, 2018

Youtube daily will Jun 30 2018

For more infomation >> The ROCKET LAUNCH will be *BLAST OFF* in Fortnite: Battle Royale! - Duration: 13:25.

-------------------------------------------

Heritage Square Will Close For Good This Weekend - Duration: 1:59.

For more infomation >> Heritage Square Will Close For Good This Weekend - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Park facilities throughout Oahu will soon be locked at night - Duration: 2:16.

For more infomation >> Park facilities throughout Oahu will soon be locked at night - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

Prince Louis Christening: Will Kate Middleton release Princess Charlotte photos? - Duration: 3:37.

 Kate Middleton is set to make her next appearance when her son Prince Louis is christened next month, and tradition is likely to follow that of Charlotte and George

 Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, has briefly stepped out of the public eye on maternity leave for a well-deserved break, but is returning for some occasions

 last seen at Trooping the Colour, Kate won't fully return to the royal schedule for a couple of months yet

 In the mean time, the country is readying for the next royal event, the christening of two-month-old Prince Louis

  Prince Louis is to be officially christened on July 9 at The Chapel Royal, in St James' Place London

 It is expected that, like the last two occasions, official photos of the Christening will be shared of the Cambridge family following the event

 Official photos included the family, including the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, the new godparents, and the Queen and Philip

  Other photos showed the royal family leaving after the occasion, and the royal couple exiting the venue with their newly christened children

  Prince Louis will be christened by Justin Welby, The Archbishop of Canterbury, the same person to have christened the last two royal children

 The new Prince will be christened at the same place as his brother Prince George, but not sister Charlotte who was christened at Sandringham chapel

  Who will Prince Louis' godparents be? Prince Louis' godparents are as of yet unconfirmed, and there is constant speculation over who will receive the honour

 So far, odds are pointing to former soon-to-be former private secretary Miguel Head and childhood nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke as the favourites

 Miguel Head is up front with odds of 2/1, while there's also a 3/1 chance Kate calls upon private secretary Rebecca Priestley

 Jessica Bridge of Ladbrokes said: "As with George and Charlotte, the Duke and Duchess chose close and trusted friends and aides, rather than immediate family members, and the odds suggest that will be the same with little Prince Louis

"   Who are Miguel Head and Tiggy Legge-Bourke? Miguel Head has been part of the royal household for more than 10 years as Prince William's private secretary

 The role of private secretary to the Duke is the most senior appointment in the Cambridge household, but Kensington Palace announced Mr Head would be leaving his role to be replaced by civil servant Simon Case

 Tiggy Legge-Bourke was hired as personal assistant to Prince Charles and nanny to Princes William and Harry

 On Prince Charles and Diana's separation, the Prince of Wales hired Tiggy as nanny to their two sons, and played an important comforting role following Diana's death

For more infomation >> Prince Louis Christening: Will Kate Middleton release Princess Charlotte photos? - Duration: 3:37.

-------------------------------------------

Tony,You Will Change The World - Iron Man 2 (2010) HD - Duration: 3:28.

Everything is achievable through technology.

Better living, robust health

and for the first time in human history, the possibility of world peace.

I'm Howard Stark,

and everything you'll need for the future can be found right here.

City of the Future? City of Tomorrow? City of...

I'm Howard Stark,

and everything you'll need in the future can be found right here.

So, from all of us at Stark Industries,

I would like to personally...

Tony, what are you doing back there? What is that?

Put that back. Put it back where you got it from.

Where's your mother? Maria?

Go on. Go, go, go, go.

All right, I think we got...

I'll... I'll... I'll come in and...

Are you waiting on me?

So, from all of us at Stark Industries, I'd like to personally show you

my ass.

I'd like to... I can't... This is...

I can't... We have this, don't we?

This is a ridiculous way...

Everything

is achievable

through technology.

Tony?

You're too young to understand this right now,

so I thought I would put it on film for you.

I built this for you.

And someday you'll realise that it represents a whole lot more

than just people's inventions. It represents my life's work.

This is the key to the future.

I'm limited by the technology of my time, but one day you'll figure this out.

And when you do,

you will change the world.

What is and always will be my greatest creation

is you.

For more infomation >> Tony,You Will Change The World - Iron Man 2 (2010) HD - Duration: 3:28.

-------------------------------------------

Arsenal transfer news: When Lucas Torreira deal will be completed, Ever Banega update - Duration: 2:27.

 Arsenal are in the midst of a midfield overhaul which has seen Santi Cazorla and Jack Wilshere head for the exit door

 Torreira has been targeted to add some much-needed steel to Unai Emery's squad as he plans for next season

 The Sampdoria ace is currently on Uruguay duty at the World Cup and will be eager to start Saturday's showdown with Portugal

 Ornstein has now explained a deal for Torreira to join Arsenal will have to wait until after the tournament in Russia ends

 And he's also revealed Ever Banega, who played under Emery at Valencia and Sevilla, is not an alternative to the 22-year-old

 "[Aaron] Ramsey contract talks ongoing," Ornstein wrote on Twitter. "Arsenal hopeful of agreement with Sampdoria for Torreira but nothing signed, no player agreement/medical - decided once #URU finish #WorldCup + if doesn't happen #AFC will look elsewhere (not Banega)

 "[Jack] Wilshere still exploring options - nothing close." Ornstein's update came hours after he claimed Calum Chambers is poised to put pen to paper on a new Arsenal deal

 "Calum Chambers will today sign a new 4yr contract with Arsenal to keep him there until 2022," said Ornstein

 "Only signed 2yr extension in Oct 2017 that tied him down until 2021 but new head coach Unai Emery sees huge potential in 23yo + wants him to compete for starting berth at centre-back #AFC

" Meanwhile, Arsenal are said to be showing interest in Mexico international Miguel Layun

 Like Torreira, the former Watford left-back is competing at the World Cup. Atletico Madrid, AC Milan and Marseille are eyeing up 30-year-old Layun too

For more infomation >> Arsenal transfer news: When Lucas Torreira deal will be completed, Ever Banega update - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

These Most Beautiful Small Houses Will Make You Reconsider Your Home | Perfect Small House Design - Duration: 11:54.

These Most Beautiful Small Houses Will Make You Reconsider Your Home

For more infomation >> These Most Beautiful Small Houses Will Make You Reconsider Your Home | Perfect Small House Design - Duration: 11:54.

-------------------------------------------

GOODLATTE: WHETHER HOUSE REPUBLICANS WILL - Duration: 14:15.

the day house Republicans have been waiting for is finally here

infamous anti-trump FBI agent Peter struck not answering questions on his

way into a congressional hearing this morning that's what you see on the

screen but he is now taking questions from the House Judiciary Committee

behind closed doors struck agreed to a voluntary appearance after Chairman Bob

Goodlatte subpoenaed him last week Goodlatte Wayne and earlier today ahead

of the big event the bias which was clearly against Donald Trump and for

Hillary Clinton is reflected in the actions that were taken by the FBI in

both those investigations she they leaned over backwards to give her

special treatment that no other criminal suspect would receive and in the Trump

case they leaned forward to launch an investigation the roots of which we need

to learn a lot more about and we will hold a public hearing with mr. struck in

the very near future and tomorrow FBI director Christopher Rae and Deputy

Attorney General rod Rosenstein are set to testify publicly before the House

Judiciary Committee the two are expected to field questions about the DOJ and FBI

is actions in the run-up to the 2016 election and findings in the recently

released Inspector General report meanwhile Republican Senator Lindsey

Graham writing a letter to Rosenstein demanding more information about the

role that struck and Lisa page played in the Russia probe

here's Graham last night on the story well hole we know now is it the person

in charge of the Clinton email investigation mr. stroke and Miss Paige

were in the tank for Clinton and hated Trump now did those two people start an

investigation against the Trump campaign because they had a political bias or was

it based on legitimate evidence my question is what role did they play in

the Russian investigation so Josh you are a veteran of the hill and a lot of

the action on this issue now has moved to Congress it's close testimony today

we heard chairman Goodlatte say that he will be having open testimony soon

what is the role here that Congress should be playing in having hearings

should they be open should some be closed

how does Congress play a helpful and not partisan role right well I know the

president would prefer if all of these were open and I think most of the

American people would too but there's also a lot of classified information

that could come up here and I think probably safety first is the best way to

handle this I don't object to the fact that this initial testimony has been

given behind closed doors but I do think something significant could come of it I

mean what we know is that Peter struck was incredibly biased about the way that

he handled his business well we don't know is how that influenced everything

right how that influenced the Clinton investigation how that ultimately

influenced the the trumpet investigation in in the Russia collusion case you know

you can see where some of his Testament testimony might be formative into what

the ultimate conclusions here this entire episode would be well Melissa

we've talked a lot about the fact that there's a closed hearing today and so

each side will come out and probably talk about it in very different ways

you've advocated for much more openness on this let the American people get

answers to these questions and so eventually is that what's going to have

to happen well I did hear one report that there's going to be a transcript

from this and I wonder how much of that we're going to be able to see or how

much of it is redacted you know we don't want them to disclose sources and

methods right the things that have been shown so far that before they said it

was sources and methods has been just an embarrassment and I think it's just it's

been a very frightening time for people in terms of what the FBI and the DOJ is

willing to do and our perception of it and we need the confidence in those

organizations restored I think Peter struck it's interesting he

seems like I mean if you looked at him walking in he looked kind of exhausted

he was trying to smile it seems like he is a story that he wants to tell and I

for one am really interested in hearing it well he has said he wanted to talk

and the situation reached and in Cindy there's that video right there by the

way of him going in that I was describing and you can kind of look and

judge for yourself yeah the situation reached a rather incendiary point for

him last week and so he said yeah definitely he wanted to be part of this

conversation I think if you take a look at the situation no matter which will

little party if there was one that was leveraging and I've heard the word

weaponize but definitely leveraging its power against another based on bias or

based on just wanting to keep their own jobs no matter who was in the White

House and keeping certain people in and out of the White House I still

critically want to know what the plan was for Peter struck and Lisa page to

keep this president out of the White House was it a wider plan they mentioned

their boss Andrew McCabe the former FBI deputy director who at the agency knew

about this plan was it just two lovers trying to out text each other it was it

well I don't know I'm asking questions so was it any of these things but I

think we do need to know that and every political party since there seems to be

socialism in the room among the Democratic Party but with every bullet

we should want we should be thirsty hungry to know how you can leverage

these agents the DOJ or the FBI and if they're going to figure out what the

punishment will be the accountability will be once we find out whether or not

that that's truly what happened but right now it's dirty yeah and one thing

is for sure a lot of stuff leaks so we don't know what we'll find out well and

to pick up on that point of wanting to know everything we're not even talking

we're talking about Peter shock that's our focus but rod Rosenstein is gonna

get a grilling to about how the Justice Department in the Congress's opinion had

not been forthcoming with information they're going to be asked he's going to

be asked all kinds of questions about what he signed off on what he did not

sign off on what he knows about the Special Counsel investigation whether he

should recuse himself based on somewhat of a conflict of interest with the

Special Counsel investigation considering he advocated or at least

approved of the firing of James Comey which prompted the Special Counsel

investigation so there are all kinds of questions also for rod Rosenstein who is

now in charge of that investigation that's all right let's do some breaking

news right now we knew

is coming together Fox News is working to confirm but so far TMZ and The

Associated Press and others are reporting that Joe Jackson has died the

patriarch of the Jackson family originally the Jackson 5 has passed away

there are reports that family sources are saying that he passed away at 3:30

this morning in Los Angeles TMZ broke the story that Joe Jackson was

hospitalized earlier this month with terminal cancer

his family has been flocking to his bedside since again that's TMZ reporting

his wife Catherine had been at his bedside as were some of the children and

grandchildren we knew that he had health problems

he was hospitalized back in 2016 with a high fever but most recently reports of

cancer and now the man the father of arguably the most famous group of people

in the world as musicians I mean you can go musician by musician about who was

the biggest star but Joe Jackson has died the patriarch of that family more

news as we get it outnumbered you're watching it we're back in a moment

Fox News Alert a federal judge in California ordering migrant children to

be reunited with their families within 30 days that is a tall order given that

some 2,000 children are still separated after illegally crossing the border the

Justice Department responding in part quote last night's Court decision makes

it even more imperative that Congress finally act to give federal law

enforcement the ability to simultaneously enforce the law and keep

families together this comes at this White House just minutes from now is

expected to vote I'm sorry the house is expected to vote on a compromise

immigration bill that is not likely to pass but President Trump this morning

tweeting House Republicans should pass these strong

but fair immigration bill known as good lot two in their afternoon vote today

even though the Dems won't let it pass in the Senate passage will show that we

want strong borders and security while the Dems want open borders crime Wynn

Fox News senior Capitol Hill producer Chad program is live with the latest

Chad I mean what's the latest vote count there

yeah they don't seem to have the votes no one here is under any assumptions

that this piece of legislation will pass they've tried to massage this bill over

the past couple of days they added a verified provisions to deal with

affirming whether or not workers were eligible to be on the job here in the

United States they added agriculture provisions for guest workers to come and

pick crops on farms but that probably gained some votes and lost some others

this is the uphill struggle that they face when the House of Representatives

is poised to vote on this bill in about a half hour 45 minutes from now and

Steve Scalise the Majority Whip continues to try to get the votes for

this but it's not looking good let's listen this bill is even stronger than

the last bill at building the wall front-loading the money so the president

Trump can have the money needs to build the wall close loopholes reunite

families it does all of those things but clearly we we haven't been able as

Republicans to get an agreement on how best to do this and and that's where the

divide is now consider this the house of representatives is on the precipice of

defeating a bill that would a lot twenty five billion dollars in cold hard cash

for the wall that's pretty extraordinary and what that does is it punch that

debate until October something else to look for in this vote on the bill that

failed last week the so-called conservative bill they got 193 yeas for

that piece of legislation that's more than they thought they were going to get

we'll see if this bill gets more or less than that vote last week what's next

well we're told that there could be a bill coming maybe not before the July

4th recess on a narrow piece of legislation that deals with the child

separation issue on the border there's a bill in the house but the one to watch

is one in the Senate there's an unusual couple working on this piece of

legislation according to Mitch McConnell the majority leader it's Dianne

Feinstein the Democrat from California and Ted Cruz the Republican from Texas

and Mitch McConnell says if you can get those two senators together on this

piece of legislation considering their divergent views they should be able to

pass that just on child separation by voice vote in the Senate Melissa all

right Chad program thank you so much for that report I'm going to bring it out to

the couch Josh I mean if you look at it it's a win win for Republicans because

if they have the vote and they lose they're able to point at Democrat

and say you voted no on daca and I remember people flooding to the Capitol

or wherever it was that Nancy Pelosi wasn't screaming in her face that she

had voted no to helping daca kids they also vote no on border security so it

becomes even if they aren't able to pass the legislation if they are that it

could say they won if they lost they can point at Democrats and say you voted no

well recall just back in late January early February Democrats have the same

opportunity actually ended up shutting the government down over this debate and

and what they shut it down over is what you're seeing again is that the base of

the Democratic Party as evidenced by the election when last night doesn't want to

do border security not only do they not want to do a wall they want open borders

altogether abolish ice is the kind of the new cry of the Democratic Party

which is just completely out of step with where vast majority of America is

on this and so if you want to fix the daca issue if you want to fix the child

separation issue for Democrats you can't even talk about fixing the larger

problem of illegal immigration Murray I know they always say because you're

explaining you're losing but how did Democrats explain voting no on daca is

that hard to defend when they go into reelection I think let's first take a

step back the Republican caucus cannot get enough votes because the hard right

does not want to vote for dreamers to get a path to citizenship so so is that

the argument the candidate no I'm just saying like let's be very honest about

why this legislation is not going to pass and I actually think Democrats

should take a look at it but and because I've said if this is our one chance to

fix daca right protect these dreamers if this is it and I fear it might be I

think we should take a long and hard look at it because they're not doing it

and in the Senate I actually think there are Democrats I mean the fact that

Dianne Feinstein is working with Ted Cruz in and of itself is sort of

groundbreaking in DC but the problem is last week the president tweeted let's

not pass anything on immigration today he says we can't boiling them I mean it

sounds that way you're gonna go with we're gonna go give he has to give

guidance to Congress and he's giving you I don't think that's a winning argument

when you're running for re-election I mean he's given to just the fact that's

not like politics with all of this is infuriated and frustrating we have a

flood on the border of people coming here illegally

catch-and-release is now back as the policy because they are now keeping

children with adults who aren't necessarily their parents there's no

mechanism now for them to prove that these are parents rather than strangers

that smugglers have put them together with in Mexico and shove them on the

border and they use the children as shields and say look this is my passport

they have a report in The New York Times about a guy saying look I have this kid

and this is my passport into the u.s. because I know they're going to release

me we have six hundred thousand cases in the backlog of the immigration system

right now that is the problem and yet we're focused on this comprehensive

dockable when we have an emergency that continues

to happen year after year and this is what Capitol Hill is focused on the

problem is now they could fix it with the feinstein cruz bill they're ignoring

it there's an emergency going on and all we're talking about is all of these

other distractions that could come later without solving the action I don't know

why everybody's sick of the establishment and Washington it's so

hard to figure out well look I I mean I think they're gonna fix it all right

we'll see well we hope so all right we're outnumbered just a

moment we'll be right back

For more infomation >> GOODLATTE: WHETHER HOUSE REPUBLICANS WILL - Duration: 14:15.

-------------------------------------------

Colony Season 3, Episode 9: Will Kidnaps Snyder | Colony on USA Network - Duration: 1:34.

For more infomation >> Colony Season 3, Episode 9: Will Kidnaps Snyder | Colony on USA Network - Duration: 1:34.

-------------------------------------------

There will be some change in my videos - Duration: 1:01.

Suggest

For more infomation >> There will be some change in my videos - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says auto tariff probe will be completed in three to four weeks - Duration: 0:38.

U.S. President Donald Trump says his administration's investigation into whether to increase tariffs

on car imports will be completed in three to four weeks.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump also said the U.S. is not

considering leaving the World Trade Organization.

Trump ordered the "Section 232" national security probe into automobiles in May, and the U.S.

Commerce Department is looking into car imports to the U.S., which include those from South

Korea, the EU and Japan.

Similar probes ordered last year... that led to import tariffs on steel and aluminum...

took about ten months to complete.

For more infomation >> Trump says auto tariff probe will be completed in three to four weeks - Duration: 0:38.

-------------------------------------------

Colony Season 3, Episode 9: Bram Wants Will To Kill Snyder | Colony on USA Network - Duration: 1:50.

For more infomation >> Colony Season 3, Episode 9: Bram Wants Will To Kill Snyder | Colony on USA Network - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

Will UX Ever Become Obsolete? (Jakob Nielsen) - Duration: 2:02.

[Aurora]: At Jakob Nielsen's keynote speech in Las Vegas, an attendee asked whether

UX would ever grow to a point where it's become so prevalent that we don't need UX people anymore.

[Jakob Nielsen]: Well, I think that research and design are the two sides of that coin

of creating a good user experience.

I think we need both.

I don't think we can do away with the research because that would presume that we would have

all the answers already and — we just need to just design something, and you don't need

to figure out what should be designed.

But we do need to figure that out, because we will always want to do something else.

Even if you just look at something like web design.

And web design has been around now for a long time.

We really do know a lot of criteria for what makes a good website.

And yet, when it comes to making a website for a specific company or for a specific purpose,

we still can't just say, "Well, just go and copy Amazon."

In fact if you copy Amazon, you will have a bad website, because you are not Amazon.

You have a different set of circumstances.

So, therefore, you always need to figure out: who are your customers, what are they trying

to do, and those are going to be different things.

Therefore, we will continue to need research, we will continue to need design,

and the two will have to work together.

And that's the way you create good products, because we are trying to solve new needs.

I mean, there are certainly some needs that you might say, they are known, and we don't need

a lot of research for those needs, but they are the less interesting parts of it: the

less value-added part of it.

And even they will need some amount of design.

But all of the new things, which is the majority, probably, of the interesting work, definitely

they require UX research, they require UX design — they require the full package.

For more infomation >> Will UX Ever Become Obsolete? (Jakob Nielsen) - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

Appell an Werbe-Influencer: Basti Pannek will Welt verändern - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> Appell an Werbe-Influencer: Basti Pannek will Welt verändern - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

Where Everyone THINKS LeBron James Will Go In The NBA - Duration: 5:30.

With LeBron James's decision being so close, I wanted to know what everyone thought of

LeBron's situation and so I asked , "Where do you think LeBron will go?"

What is up dudes, dudettes, ballers, players.

It's ya boi MJ.

This is the 50K special video and I was lucky enough to go to VidCon.

Thanks to the NBA for the whole trip.

So while I was there I asked a lot of content creators and Youtubers where they thought

LeBron would go.

Y'all been asking for a facecam so here it is!

Let me know in the comments where you think LeBron will go and let's just get

right into it.

I don't know where you came from Andy, but thanks!

I personally want LeBron to go to the Lakers cuz I'm a Lakers fan and who doesn't wanna

be in LA, but the way free agency is shaping up, it's seeming like he might actually

stay in Cleveland as crazy as that sounds.

Now my mic was bugging when I was talking with Flight and McQueen so

I added subtitles.

I

was also able to go to Venice Beach after vidcon and they featured me in a game so if

you wanna see this whole vlog of vidcon, of the game, lemme know in the comments down

below and check out VeniceBall cause they got a special vibe.

Big thanks to everyone who was in the video, cause it was just a great time.

I love the way basketball can just bring people together.

Now you have to lemme know in the comments where you think LeBron is going since he has

opted out and because the decision is coming up.

There's also a giveaway coming up soon too.

Drop a like if y'all liked the video and for all the awesome people in it.

Their links will be in the description.

The end of this video got even more people

in it.

The instagram shout of the day goes to beastmode and the ALLDAY notification squad shout out

goes to Igor Felix Felix.

Thanks for the ALLDAY support.

Make sure to hit the bell for ALLDAY notifications and if you're not a sub, hit that subscribe

button to join the ALLDAY community for more fire content and ALLDAY support.

It's ya boi MJ.

We Out!

For more infomation >> Where Everyone THINKS LeBron James Will Go In The NBA - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

SENATOR RAND PAUL (R-KY): I THINK SUPREME COURT VOTE WILL BE DIVIDED ALONG PARTY LINES - Duration: 14:15.

all right we'll know soon not what the president wants to do about this

replacing Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court here now much of this was

telegraphed it was just a matter of when we were told not even if but again as we

indicated the Supreme Court justice indicated the president today you want

to stop by talk to the president tell him in person that he wanted to step

down and now the choices the president has a list he's going to use that list

now on that list so happens to be a the Utah Senator Mike Lee I want to get the

read on that from Kentucky Senator Rand Paul what he makes of that one Center on

the list senator and your colleague Mike Lee how do you feel about that I think

it'd be a great pick but I think I'd hate to lose him in the Senate you know

he and I are allies on so many things constitutional war powers criminal you

know justice reform personal privacy all of these issues Mike Lee has been right

there with me so I'd hate to lose him from the Senate but he's a very

thoughtful guy well-read well-spoken and knows the law better than anybody that

I've ever met probably so he'd be a great pick but I'd be of divided

loyalties because I think we really need him in the Senate where we're often

outnumbered by people who don't really seem to give a darn at all about the

Constitution well that's high praise from you Senator obviously would be a

little convoluted too because then he would have to leave the Senate and then

obviously the governor of that state with a point of replacement that could

be confusing but do you think that there's any anyone on that list that

could surprise folks that the because some people look back for to be on the

conservative side say you know we've been disappointed before they use the

Souter example and others even Anthony Kennedy and surprised people with you

know how he could go from conservative to a swing vote

albeit an important vote but what do you make of it I don't know everybody on the

list but I do know that guy who was at the top of the list Neel Gorsuch is

amazing I just read his opinion in the carpenter case is the case about whether

the government can track your location forever all of the time without a war

and his was the only dissent that said when you give your records to a third

party a telephone company or a bank horses was the only one that says the

fourth amendment digital still should apply completely and always that you

still have a privacy or a property ownership in information when you let

somebody hold it you haven't given up an expectation of privacy and Gorsuch

opinion was better than anybody else's on the court so you're talking to a

guy's a big fan of course such on the Fourth Amendment and I think on property

and on a lot of other issues he's going to probably end up being the most

libertarian justice we have so if anybody else's in the mode of Neal

Gorsuch I'm all for them you know senators some of the recent decisions

that have been close ones at 5-4 rulings you know have prompted some to say we

need a more decisive court one more conservative vote in this case could

potentially make 5-4 ruling 6-3 rulings the other side laments that process

though and that hints that this is going to be a very very divisive summer into

the fall what do you think you know I if I had to predict I think Supreme Court

vote no matter who president Trump picks will be divided along party lines

because the Democrats have dug in and I don't think they're willing to look at

each individual person that is nominated they're so angry they're not talking

about violence there are people in the Capitol pushing people yelling kidnapper

I mean it's really gotten kind of out of hand you have members of comrade of

Congress fomenting this kind of stuff so no I think they're gonna dig their heels

in and just yell and scream and vote against anybody president Trump picks

but you know they're about eight states where Democrats are running for the US

Senate where President Trump won by between 20 and 40 points and so if they

want to yell and scream and say they hate everything about the Trump and

they're not going to do anything and not listen to anything Republicans have to

say their voters might think otherwise in November because I think they're

tired of Democrats making everything so partisan frankly so this other view that

oh what's the rush and hear that from any of the left

what there is no need to rush and they use that and Chuck Shumer I believe use

that if I'm paraphrasing a senator that you know Mitch McConnell had used that

argument in holding off on a Barack Obama appointment for the Supreme Court

position that was ultimately filled by judge gorgeous that they're the same

applies here so they wonder about I would say it's a

completely different situation when Senator McConnell said we need to wait

till after the election it was a presidential election the president gets

to pick Supreme Court so you can see how when you're in the middle of deciding

that the president is you probably also shouldn't at the very last minute of a

presidency when that president's not running have them pick you can see how

the election might really be important to decide who the next presidents going

to be we're not going through a presidential election we're just going

through a congressional election so no I think we should proceed forthwith and

like I say if President Trump nominates somebody half as good or nearly as good

as Neil Gorsuch I'll be very happy because there is another thought here

whatever happens in the house senator there's a good likelihood at least in

the Senate Republicans could pick up seats way too early to say and you're

not gotten in this before but the math might improve or the odds of getting a

pick approved right now it's as close as you can get yeah no I think that it's

very likely that the Republicans keep their majority in the Senate or actually

maybe expand that authority or a majority I think in the house it's going

to be historic but typically throughout history when a president wins in one

party the other party often takes over 30 seats or more in the house I think

it's looking less likely than that because the Democrats problem is there

now the party of sort of special sort of small percentage sort of victim groups

spread out through society but they've sort of lost track of being for the

working man and I think just the general working man who's not part of some sort

of special class or a special group victim group who just wants a good job

is starting to see gosh the economy is picking up wages are picking up this may

be the most rapid growth we've seen in a decade or more

I think we're gonna hit four percent GDP growth I think the enthusiasm I feel I

think we could hit five percent GDP growth if we could just sort of calm the

waters on the trade front but if we can get beyond this trade war and it doesn't

escalate I think the tax return is just starting to get into the economy and I

really think you're gonna see some amazing economic growth

you mentioned the economic growth on the wind that's been at the back certainly

the president course we had a market trip up today as we've had nine of the

last 11 trading day so I don't want to get too overly obsessed with that but is

your concern I'm a senator that a chief justice should should be a strict

constitutionalists in other words just following what our forefathers intended

and not trying to reinterpret that or add to that because by that definition a

lot of modern-day decisions were apart from that and and that even so-called

conservative just now swing vote justices have the herb from that what

does a Rand Paul want to see out of the Supreme Court pick someone who reads the

Constitution as it was intended is aware of the original intent of the the

framers of the Constitution and understands basically if they wanted a

very small government it did very little in the marketplace and actually had a

very modest and moderate foreign policy that made it difficult to go to war we

only went to war when Congress voted on it so a constitution that was not only

thought it was important to protect privacy but you know John Adams said

that James Otis's arguments against general warrants or writs of assistance

he said it was the spark that led to the revolution so Fourth Amendment privacy

issues are very big for those of us who believe in the original interpretation

of the Constitution all I can say that don't know everyone on the list but I do

think that Neal corsets who is at the top of the list has turned out to be a

great justice and if we can get any more similar to Neal Wars which I'll be

exceedingly happy Senator Rand Paul very good seeing you thank you very much

thank you all right then there is the religious

issue involved here the right to life issue involved here roe v-- wade and so

much here what's at stake with evangelical leader Bob Vander Plaats

after this

alright you could mark it consistently and like clockwork every time it's

Supreme Court position opens up the first issue that comes to mind is roe

v-- wade right to life the whole abortion issue comes back and what role

and what thoughts that particular justice has or potential justice has on

these matters it's an important matter that's next guest the president CEO of

the Family Leader Bob Vander Plaats but they're gonna have you how crucial is

that issue to you I mean I above others with others among others what it's the

cornerstone of all their issues Neil I think this is an opportunity to restore

a culture of life in this country that honors God and blesses people we

definitely see this as an answer to prayer I think it also marks that this

might be the most consequential election 2016 at least in my lifetime the one

versus Hillary and president Trump because of Gorsuch is a standard we'd

like to see another Gorsuch on that court now you might be surprised those

on the Left feel a little differently and they have even ERDs that this be put

off on how do you feel about that well I don't think it should be put off and

we're thrilled to have our own senator Iowa's u.s. senator being chaired the

Judiciary Committee chuck Grassley he's the one who actually pushed it back

until we had the presidential election but this isn't a presidential election

we do at President Trump he's going to appoint the next Supreme Court justice

nominee and I believe this Senate is going to confirm his desire even if it

got pushed off me I think we're gonna do is you see a rallying of the base when

they thought the base on the right was not going to be energized this time

that's the base of the race going to be very energized they see what's at stake

as you mentioned the culture of life is at stake you know you think about it -

they might be careful what they wish for right because there's a possibility that

if they waited the number of Republicans in the Senate could actually increase

regardless what happens in the house and so that's where all the action will be

on this appointment but having said that there is a sense that do we just reverse

row v Wade but what do we do going for what would be your preference going

forward well in Iowa we took a major step this past legislative session we

passed heartbeat legislation signed by Governor Reynolds that whole legislation

was aimed and purposed to take down roe v wade because nil you understand the

crux of the roe v wade argument was if we could ever determine that that baby

was a person that whole case collapses a heartbeat does that we knew the courts

were going to be changing we didn't know candy was gonna be retiring but we knew

of Gorsuch there and if Kennedy did retire or Ginsburg stepped off the court

we knew Trump was going to be a constitutional conservative president

who would appoint constitutional conservative judges and we have a chance

to take down roe v wade this is a historic moment in the pro-life

community today let me then go on to gay marriage Bob there there's a sense that

that is now settled law and that the Supreme Court has settled it not once

but twice technically three times do you agree with that no I don't agree with it

I think God's designed for marriage and family we will revert back to that I

think the reason you're seeing Senator Schumer and others being so upset about

what's taken place today everything that they've run through and got passed has

been through the courts it hasn't been through the people hasn't

been through the elected office holders and now the courts are changing and so

we think marriage needs to be debated again and I think we think we use the

people should be decided reverted back do you mean that marriage it can only be

accepted between a man and a woman yeah I do believe that absolutely those

marriages that we've seen same-sex marriages that we'd seen would it be

your view then Bob that that this new configured Supreme Court down the road

assuming it's more conservative should recognize that as well and upend all of

these gay marriages well I think what we should do as a culture is return back to

the way God designed and intended it and that is between a man and

woman those are the parameters with that one that would be very big news to a

number of gays and those who welcome these three decisions technically three

that has now seen marriage in that expanded light you do not and you don't

think we should no I don't think we should and I I think we're going to

continue to have this conversation as a country but we're do it in the right

process and that's why I think what you saw with your previous guests Rand Paul

wanting a constitutional conservative Supreme Court justice who understands

it's not their job to make law and it's not their job to rewrite the

Constitution a constitutional amendment is done by we the people not by five

Supreme Court justices so I think there's going to be a lot of issues up

for debate but in large part this is a very exciting day for those who believe

in the fabric of the Constitution today Bob Vander Plaats the CEO the Family

Leader thank you very good seeing you good seeing you too thank you new well

right he was a Democratic vice-presidential candidate an

independent United States Senator if it being a Democratic senator the prominent

leader on this whole issue that's about to come up to his old colleagues in the

United States Senate what does Joe Lieberman make of what the good Reverend

just said of what Ron Paul has been saying and what everyone seems to be

saying in between about a royal a battle to come of course from Rand Paul and

others

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét