The Federal Reserve Is A Saboteur – And The
"Experts" Are Oblivious
I have written on the subject of the Federal Reserve's deliberate sabotage of the U.S.
economy many times in the past.
In fact, I even once referred to the Fed as an "economic suicide bomber."
I still believe the label fits perfectly, and the Fed's recent actions I think directly
confirm my accusations.
Back in 2015, when I predicted that the central bankers would shift gears dramatically into
a program of consistent interest rate hikes and that they would begin cutting off stimulus
to the U.S. financial sector and more specifically stock markets, almost no one wanted to hear
it.
The crowd-think at that time was that the Fed would inevitably move to negative interest
rates, and that raising rates was simply "impossible."
Many analysts, even in the liberty movement, quickly adopted this theory without question.
Why?
Because of a core assumption that is simply false; the assumption that the Federal Reserve's
goal is to maintain the U.S. economy at all costs or at least maintain the illusion that
the economy is stable.
They assume that the U.S. economy is indispensable to the globalists and that the U.S. dollar
is an unassailable tool in their arsenal.
Therefore, the Fed would never deliberately undermine the American fiscal structure because
without it "they lose their golden goose."
This is, of course, foolish nonsense.
Since its initial inception from 1913-1916, the Federal Reserve has been responsible for
the loss of 98% of the dollar's buying power.
Idiot analysts in the mainstream argue that this statistic is not as bad as it seems because
"people have been collecting interest" on their cash while the dollar's value has
been dropping, and this somehow negates or outweighs any losses in purchasing power.
These guys are so dumb they don't even realize the underlying black hole in their own argument.
IF someone put their savings into an account or into treasury bonds and earned interest
from the moment the Fed began quickly undermining dollar value way back in 1959, then yes, they
MIGHT have offset the loss by collecting interest.
However, this argument, insanely, forgets to take into account the many millions of
people who were born long after the Fed began its devaluation program.
What about the "savers" born in 1980, or 1990?
They didn't have the opportunity to collect interest to offset the losses already created
by the Fed.
They were born into an economy where saving is inherently more difficult because a person
must work much harder to save the same amount of capital that their parents saved, not to
mention purchase the same items their parents enjoyed, such as a home or a car.
Over the decades, the Fed has made it nearly impossible for households with one wage earner
to support a family.
Today, men and women who should be in the prime of their careers and starting families
are for the first time in 130 years more likely to be living at home with their parents than
any other living arrangement.
People are more likely to be living with their parents now than back during time periods
in which young people actually wanted to stay close to their parents to take care of them.
That is to say, most young people are stuck at home because they can't afford to do
anything else, not because they necessarily want to be there.
This is almost entirely a symptom of central bank devaluation of the currency and its purchasing
potential.
The degradation of the American wage earner since the Fed fiat machine began killing the
greenback is clear as day.
The Fed is also responsible for almost every single major economic downturn since it was
established.
As I have noted in the past, Ben Bernanke openly admitted that the Fed was the root
cause of the prolonged economic carnage during the Great Depression on Nov. 8, 2002, in a
speech given at "A Conference to Honor Milton Friedman … On the Occasion of His 90th Birthday:"
"In short, according to Friedman and Schwartz, because of institutional changes and misguided
doctrines, the banking panics of the Great Contraction were much more severe and widespread
than would have normally occurred during a downturn.
Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the
Federal Reserve.
I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression.
You're right, we did it.
We're very sorry.
But thanks to you, we won't do it again."
Bernanke is referring in part to the Fed's program of raising interest rates into an
economic downturn, exacerbating the situation in the early 1930's and making the system
highly unstable.
He lies and says the Fed "won't do it again;" they are doing it RIGHT NOW.
The Fed was the core instigator behind the credit and derivatives bubble that led to
the crash in 2008, a crash that has caused depression-like conditions in America that
we are still to this day dealing with.
Through artificially low interest rates and in partnership with sectors of government,
poor lending standards were highly incentivised and a massive debt trap was created.
Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan publicly admitted in an interview that the central
bank KNEW an irrational bubble had formed, but claims they assumed the negative factors
would "wash out."
Yet again, a Fed chairman admits that they either knew about or caused a major financial
crisis.
So we are left two possible conclusions — they were too stupid to speak up and intervene,
or, they wanted these disasters to occur.
Today, we are faced with two more brewing bubble catastrophes engineered by the Fed:
The stock market bubble and the dollar/treasury bond bubble.
The stock market bubble is rather obvious and openly admitted at this point.
As the former head of the Federal Reserve Dallas branch, Richard Fisher, admitted in
an interview with CNBC, the U.S. central bank in particular has made its business the manipulation
of the stock market to the upside since 2009:
"What the Fed did — and I was part of that group — is we front-loaded a tremendous
market rally, starting in 2009.
It's sort of what I call the "reverse Whimpy factor" — give me two hamburgers
today for one tomorrow."
Fisher went on to hint at his very reserved view of the impending danger:
"I was warning my colleagues, Don't go wobbly if we have a 10 to 20 percent correction
at some point…
Everybody you talk to… has been warning that these markets are heavily priced."
[In reference to interest rate hikes]
The Fed "front-loaded" the incredible bull market rally through various methods,
but one of the key tools was the use of near-zero interest rate overnight loans from the central
bank, which corporations around the world have been exploiting since the 2008 crash
to fund stock buybacks and pump up the value of stock markets.
As noted by Edward Swanson, author of a study from Texas A&M on stock buybacks used to offset
poor fundamentals:
"We can't say for sure what would have happened without the repurchase, but it really
looks like the stock would have kept going down because of the decline in fundamentals…
these repurchases seem to hold up the stock price."
In the initial TARP audit, an audit that was limited and never again duplicated, it was
revealed that corporations had absorbed trillions in overnight loans from the Fed.
It was at this time that stock buybacks became the go-to method to artificially prop up equities
values.
The problem is, just like they did at the start of the Great Depression, the central
bank is once again raising interest rates into a declining economy.
This means that all those no-cost loans used by corporations to buy back their own stocks
are now going to have a price tag attached.
An interest rate of 1% might not seem like much to someone who borrows $1000, but what
about for someone who borrows $1 Trillion?
Yes, borrowing at ANY interest rate becomes impossible when you need that much capital
to prop up your stock.
The loans have to be free, otherwise, there will be no loans.
Thus, we have to ask ourselves another question; is the Fed really ignorant enough to NOT know
that raising rates will kill stock markets?
They openly admit that they knew what they were doing when they inflated stock markets,
so it seems to me that they would know how to deflate stock markets.
Therefore, if they deliberately engineered the market rally with low interest rates,
it follows that they are deliberately engineering a crash in markets using higher interest rates.
Mainstream economists and investment "experts" appear rather bewildered by the Federal Reserve's
exuberance on rate hikes.
Many assumed that Janet Yellen would hint at a pullback from the hike schedule due to
the considerable level of negative data on our fiscal structure released over the past
six months.
Yellen has done the opposite.
In fact, Fed officials are now stating that equities and other assets appear to be "overvalued"
and that markets have become complacent.
This is a major reversal from the central bank's attitude just two years ago.
The fundamental data has always been negative ever since the credit crisis began.
So what has really changed?
Well, Donald Trump, the sacrificial scapegoat, is now in the White House, and, central bank
stimulus has a shelf life.
They can't prop up equities for much longer even if they wanted to.
The fundamentals will always catch up with the fiat illusion.
No nation in history has ever been able to print its way to prosperity or even recovery.
The time is now for the Fed to pull the plug and lay blame in the lap of their mortal enemy
– conservatives and sovereignty champions.
They will ignore all financial reality and continue to hike.
This is a guarantee.
In the Liberty Movement the major misconception is that the Fed is attempting to "catch
up" to the next crash by raising interest rates so that they will be ready to stimulate
again.
There is no catching up to this situation.
The Fed has no interest in saving stock markets or the economy.
Again, the fed has raised rates before into fiscal decline (during the Great Depression),
and the result was a prolonged crisis.
They know exactly what they are doing.
What does the Fed gain from this sabotage?
Total centralization.
For example, before the Great Depression there used to be thousands of smaller private and
localized banks in America.
After the Great Depression most of those banks were either destroyed or absorbed by elite
banking conglomerates.
Banking in the U.S. immediately became a fully centralized monopoly by the majors.
In a decade, they were able to remove all local competition and redundancy, making communities
utterly beholden to their credit system.
The 2008 crash allowed the banking elites to introduce vast stimulus measures requiring
unaccountable fiat money creation.
Rather than saving America from crisis, they have expanded the crisis to the point that
it will soon threaten the world reserve status of our currency.
The Fed in particular has set the U.S. up not just for a financial depression, but for
a full spectrum calamity which will include a considerable devaluation (yet again) of
our currency's value and resulting in extreme price inflation in necessities.
The next phase of this collapse will include the end of the dollar as we know it, making
way for a new global currency system that uses the IMF's SDR basket as a foundation.
This plan is openly admitted in the elitist run magazine 'The Economist' in an article
entitled "Get Ready For A Global Currency By 2018."
It is important to understand what the Fed actually is — the Fed is a weapon.
It is a weapon used by globalists to destroy the American system at a given point in time
in order to clear the way for a new single world economy controlled by a single managerial
entity (most likely the IMF or BIS).
This is the Fed's purpose.
The central bank is not here to save the U.S. from harm, it is here to make sure the U.S.
falls in a particular manner — a controlled demolition of our fiscal structure.
For more infomation >> [ซับนรก] BLACKPINK - 'มักจะชอบด้อมๆ (มองๆ) (AS IF IT'S YOUR LAST)' - Duration: 4:00. 
For more infomation >> Seth Williams Pleads Guilty In Corruption Case, Resigns As Philly DA - Duration: 2:54. 
For more infomation >> [K-POP VERSUS] BLACKPINK - AS IF IT'S YOUR LAST VS MAMAMOO - YES I AM - Duration: 5:42. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét