Cirque du Soleil is like the best circus acts in the world.
Everything they do is always top notch,
and they've really got like a sort of almost mythical reputation.
We're in Glasgow, and we are doing
a Cirque du Soleil C:LAB exploration workshop.
It's stuff that you'd never find in like a normal skate park
or anywhere else in the world.
This workshop is a lot about experimentation.
They're very much of the belief that they can kind of train somebody up
to almost do anything, or make the impossible possible.
We're just trying to get all synchronized.
We just need to kind of be focused and be switched on,
because any minute, like your mind slips, yeah, you're just gonna crash
or come right off the side.
We start to work with bicycles in other shows,
but now we have that organ, that is really dedicated to that,
to push the limit in any direction.
The main objective is to see if
it's possible to ride bikes on the Wheel of Death.
There's Vision Ramps, the Cirque du Soleil performance
and then the BMXs are all coming together
to bring three different worlds together as one.
Vision have basically built a contraption
that is going to mimic one of the circles of the Wheel of Death.
So they're just kind of working out whether
it's possible to ride outside of it and also inside of it.
It's definitely out there in terms of bike riding.
Today, we've got a free-standing, 8-foot-high, Wheel-of-Death wannabe,
and we're just essentially trying to see what it's like
to ride the wheel just when it's rolling.
Yesterday was with the scaffolding around
to make sure they can adapt to the speed of the wheel
and to react to the mechanism,
and now we are going to try without.
I would say that I'm not scared, but a little concerned.
That is terrifying.
It's kind of how I imagined it, where simple things would work,
but then there'd be so much development as we went on,
and just with like being able to push it.
Been awesome, especially the hamster wheel.
Been designing that for a few months,
so it's really cool to see the guys finally ride on it.
You got to concentrate when you're trying that.
It's progression.
As well as riding on the actual apparatus,
we want to see if the riders can jump through it.
The Wheel of Death, we're just jumping through it.
Even that by itself, jumping through it is pretty scary,
because you can't see the landing.
It's totally blind. It's getting scary.
I thought he was dead.
I think this is absolutely insane,
it's like nothing that anyone has ever rode before.
It's quite amazing to see these guys going through that small space.
They're really bringing something really different. I like it.
If the question if me, can I see already an act?
For sure, but not just one.
We were getting a lot of inspiration by watching those guys.
They are so crazy and so incredibly talented.
Again for me, it's always the same thing:
it's pushing the human physical limits.
That's what we do, and that's definitely what those guys did.
It's cool, it's exciting, and there's like a lot of work to do.
This is the first workshop we're doing for the show.
I'm sure there'll be many more.
Definitely excited to see where all this is gonna go.
It's been amazing, but it's definitely been scary and bit intimidating.
I can't wait to see how this all turns out,
and this is the first stages of development.
So far it's looking pretty promising,
and I'm sure it's gonna be an amazing in the end.
For more infomation >> BMX Tricks you have NEVER seen before! | BMX Wheel of Death #CirqueShop | Cirque du Soleil - Duration: 5:13.-------------------------------------------
Why Memory cards/pendrives have Smaller size than they Showed ? | explained | Curious Brain - Duration: 2:52.
you might notice that your computer shows the size of a your pendrive or mermory card
little less as compared to the size promised by the manufactured company or
as label on the box
have you ever wondered why your memory card or pendrive
has smaller storage capacity than they showed?
the reason has to do with math and marketing but our question is..
why the stated capacity of the drive can't be usable
so here is the answer there are three different reasons behind it
reason one different operating systems treat your disk differently windows os may
not show the disk space like Linux , Mac or Unix there are little discrepancies
between the file formats and algorithms used by the different operating systems
but it does not matter as much
reason two another reason is that a portion of
memory space is reserved for system files and data sectors for better
performance this is the primary reason behind the
less usable space than the mentioned space reason 3 the last reason it is
actually a logical reason and main reason before moving to the topic if
you are not yet subscribed to my channel please go ahead and subscribe by
clicking on the red button down below because it helps me to keep making more videos like this
now moving to the topic humans think of numbers in base 10
that is for manufactures 1 KB equal to thousand bytes 1 MB equal to thousand
kilo bytes 1 GB equal to thousand megabytes and so on on the other hand
for computers 1 KB equal to 1024 bytes 1 mb equal to 1024 kilobytes
and 1 GB equal to 1024 megabytes and so on for instance you bought a new 32 GB
memory card when you put it in your mobile or computer it shows 29.8 GB only
where the 2.2 GB of storage gone ? do the manufactured company cheated you?
well this difference is due to the different number systems used by humans
and digital circuits let's have a look at this simple
calculation for manufacturer 32gb equal to 32 x 1000 mb
that equal to 32 x 1000 x 1000 kilobytes that equal to 32 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 bytes
that is equal to 32E9 bytes and computer knows 1mb
equal to 1024 KB and 1 GB equal to 1024 MB and so on.. therefore the computer calculates as follows
32 GB equal to 32 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 bytes by 1024 x 1024 x 1024 bytes
that equal to 29.8 GB
hope you understand this ... :)
-------------------------------------------
Pa. Senate Approves Bill To Let School Workers Have Guns - Duration: 1:52.
For more infomation >> Pa. Senate Approves Bill To Let School Workers Have Guns - Duration: 1:52. -------------------------------------------
Alyssa lost her phone? - Never have I ever - Duration: 8:46.
heyyyyyy guys !! :) :P
so Alyssa ( my friend) and I are going to play never have i ever.
Sorry about the cards I know it's hard to see the writing :)
We both have :)
me being weird :P
it's ok it's true sadly
oh noooooo 'and; says Alyssa looking at the ground sadly thinking should i say it
Oh no gigiling is it a bad sign or a good sign..
nooooo please say neverrr
Oh nooo more stories when are the tales going to stop 'kidding'
When you imagine it all happening again and you just can't help but laugh..
Red llickerish with milk chocolate inside of it sooo yumm
BLAH BLAH BLAH
wait did she say fake or fate .. i wonder
noooooooooooooooooooooo
WOOO go Alyssa lol
FINALLY
OOOH Alyssa please tell
Them memes
oooh go on
awkward silence....
wait I thought you could read?? nevermind :)
But hasn't everyone
acterally five hours do sound a bit right
im joking we are joking
Noooo that's mine!!
oh my i guess ill never get that dollar back
my room is where you find all the treasures?
my left hand hates me
Emily: looks at the camera covers her mouth thinking- oh no i do this alot
that face lol
i remembered it was my chocolate lickerish lolly the thing that Alyssa was eating earlier
IT'S A PUPPET
yes please do that it would mean alot :)
Hey i have more than 30
and maybe i will even have more then that if you quickly hit that subscribe button
wait no sorry just tap it or click it if your on the computer...
-------------------------------------------
ALERT, ALERT! Central Banks Buying Stocks Have Rigged US Stock Market Beyond Recovery - Duration: 34:33.
Central banks buying stocks are effectively nationalizing US corporations just to maintain
the illusion that their "recovery" plan is working because they have become the banks
that are too big to fail.
At first, their novel entry into the stock market was only intended to rescue imperiled
corporations, such as General Motors during the first plunge into the Great Recession,
but recently their efforts have shifted to propping up the entire stock market via major
purchases of the most healthy companies on the market.
Brian Rich, writing for Forbes, describes the economic illusion created by central banks
buying stocks during a time of presidential prosecution:
The chaos and dysfunction message is loud, but markets aren't hearing it.
The real story is very different.
Stocks continue to surge; stock market volatility continues to sit at ten–year (pre–crisis)
lows.
The interest rate market is much higher than it was before the election, but now quiet
and stable.
Gold, the fear–of–the–unknown trade, is relatively quiet.
This all looks very much like a world that believes a real economic expansion is underway,
and that a long–term sustainable global economic recovery has supplanted the shaky
post-crisis (central bank–driven) recovery that was teetering back toward recession.
In other words, political chaos in the regime is not denting the stock market, because central
banks buying stocks are eliminating volatility.
Indeed, if you were to gauge the economy at this point by the US stock market, everything
must be grand because the Trump Rally has been one of our most exuberant stock rallies.
According to Rich, all of that is a central-bank-created slight of hand intended to distract you from
what is happening in politics and throughout the macro economy:
Remember, the financial media and Wall Street are easily distractible.
Not only do they have short attention spans, but they've been trained throughout their
careers to find new stories to obsess about….
We have major central banks around the world that continue to print money.
These central banks buy assets with that freshly printed money.
That means, stocks, bonds and commodities go higher.
Distract you from what?
Distract you via the roaring success of stocks from the fact that the central banks' recovery
is failing everywhere.
As Rich says, the fate of the world now rests on the successful outcome of these new policies
because the banks that are now too big to fail are the central banks, themselves.
The Fed and its central proxies are creating a grand distraction from a story that would
chill America to the bone … if the truth were told.
Proofs of central banks buying stocks to rig the market
The Federal Reserve already confessed it rigged the stock market last January in hopes of
creating a "wealth effect" throughout the US economy.
Its plan, confessed by ex-Fed governor Richard Fisher was to front-run the stock market with
its forward messaging about bond purchases though which it created massive liquidity
that would be invested in stocks.
It worked like this: By promising overnight profits on bonds to its member banks, the
Fed knew they would soak up tons of bonds.
From there, the Fed hoped the member banks would take the money they made off of buying
US bonds and selling them immediately to the Fed for a profit and invest that money in
stocks, which they did.
(Whether the Fed was just hoping or was secretly directing its member banks to do so could
be speculated about endlessly; but they expressed it as "hoping to create a wealth effect.")
Until now I have been speculating about central banks buying stocks, claiming that was all
that was supporting the stock market; but I was also just speculating for years that
the Federal Reserve was intentionally front-running the stock market throughout its "recovery."
Now those interventions in the stock market, which fueled the Fed's recovery throughout
the market's long climb, are a well-known fact, admitted to by the Federal Reserve.
My speculation that the long bull market was driven almost entirely by banks was much doubted
years ago when I and other writers gathered at Zero Hedge, were claiming that was exactly
what the Fed was doing.
I couldn't prove it back then, but everything clearly pointed in that direction, even as
many experts denied it.
Last year, I upped my claims to saying that I believed the only thing that terminated
the stock crash in January was a move toward even more direct Fed rigging of stock prices
via having proxies buy oil (one significant cause of the January crash) and stocks directly.
All year long, I speculated that the Fed was merely holding the illusion of recovery together
by directly buying select commodities and stocks to drive the markets back up because
it was an election year in which they would "pull out all the stops," In this case
that expression doesn't mean organ stops, but all the market stops, but particularly
the biggest stop of all that said central banks should not buy stocks because their
capacity to rig the markets is infinite, and they have no investment risk.
They can buy and hold forever, and they can create new money to replace any they lose.
As if to confirm my suspicions, the Fed began talking early last year about the possibility
of buying stocks directly.
However, they implied that would only happen, if at all, in some distant future should the
economy crash again.
I stated that this thing they would like to be able to do overtly and with everyone's
blessing was something they were already doing covertly.
They were merely running the flag up the pole to see if they could move from working through
proxies to being able to work openly — testing the nation's response by putting the idea
out there.
Recently Bank of America, the Wall Street Journal and others have begun to state that
central banks are buying stocks in huge quantities.
The only questions remaining is whether they are doing so at the Fed's bidding and whether
they are doing it primarily to prop up an otherwise failing stock market.
By definition, cornering enough of the market to push it where they want it to go is called
"rigging."
What is the scale of central banks buying stocks?
The Forbes article from May continues,
Among the reports on portfolio holdings yesterday, we heard from the Swiss National Bank….
Switzerland's central bank has more freshly printed money to put to work every quarter,
and has been increasing their allocation to equities dramatically–$80 billion of which
is now (as of the end of the first quarter) in U.S. stocks!
That's a 29% bigger stake than they had at the end of 2016.
The SNB is the world's eighth biggest public investor.
In one quarter, they upped their stake in US stocks by almost a third, and they are
only the eighth-largest public investor!
What are the other big guys doing?
Back in April, Bank of America noted that central banks had purchased $1 trillion in
assets this year alone.
Now, that includes bonds more than it does stocks; but globally it tells us that quantitative
easing continues at a massive scale, even as the Fed is unwinding its stimulus (or says
it is).
Now, you have to know that a lot of that trillion dollars in less than a year is flowing across
the ocean to the United States because the US remains the best looking horse in the glue
factory.
In fact, Marketwatch summed up BofA's analysis of the situation by saying, "that might
be all you need to know about stock and bond market performance in 2017."
Indeed, that one fact by itself may sum up everything there is to say about why stocks
are still rising and why the Trump Rally was as steep as it was and why it is trying for
a third time to push a hole through the ceiling.
Market watch notes that central banks have gobbled up a "record amount of financial
assets" this year.
At the time the research was conducted, this would translate into well over $3 trillion
annualized, making this the strongest period of central-bank stimulus since 2007!
No small claim, since that earlier period was the most extraordinary stimulus burst
history had ever seen.
Ask yourself an honest question if you believe in the Fed's continual recovery narrative:
"Is this what recovery looks like — continued record amounts of stimulus forever?"
Yet, the story only gets richer.
(Well, for some.)
The newly created money invested by the Swiss National Bank didn't attempt to buy important
but dying companies.
It went predominantly to Facebook, Alphabet (Google) and Apple.
Is it any wonder, then, that these stocks, known as the FAANG stocks, are the ones that
drove the NASDAQ to new heights?
The Swiss National Bank has gone from having about 9% of its holdings in stocks back in
2007 to currently having 22% of its much larger balance sheet in stocks.
Last year, when I speculated about all of this, the SNB had already increased its stock
holdings by 41% in a year's time!
By the third quarter of 2016, when I was just speculating the central banks were the major
driver, the SNB owned $1.7 billion of Apple, $1.2 billion of Microsoft and $1.08 billion
of Exxon.
(Remember my speculations on the oil connection?)
Reuters reported last year that …
Switzerland's central bank now owns more publicly-traded shares in Facebook than Mark
Zuckerberg, part of a mushrooming stock portfolio that is likely to grow yet further.
The tech giant's founder and CEO has other ways to control his company: Zuckerberg holds
most of his stake in a different class of stock.
Nevertheless this example illustrates how the Swiss National Bank has become a multi-billion-dollar
equity investor due to its campaign to hold down the Swiss franc.
In 2017, it stepped up its purchases!
Is this situation of central banks buying stocks insignificant to US stock prices?
Not according to Bank of America:
BofA's analysts called this "supernova of liquidity" the "only one flow that
matters" and the "best explanation" for the double-digit gains in stocks that
was happing in the first half of the year.
They called it the "the $1 trillion flow that conquers all."
So, now we have moved from my speculating all of last year that central banks buying
stocks were the sole factor that was pushing up stocks to Bank of America now proclaiming
outright that it is the sole factor that matters in the rise of US stocks — a factor so huge
that it dwarfs all other drivers.
More evidence of central banks buying stocks in the US
Is the Fed in bed with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange?
I owe the following research to Chris Martenson on his Peak Prosperity website in an article
titled "Where There's Smoke … There's central bank manipulation" and to Zero Hedge.
I'll summarize Martenson's findings here, and you can check out the article if you want
more detail:
After Hurricane Sandy, the New York Fed moved part of its markets group to Chicago where
the CME is located.
The Fed reported that the move was being done as a safety precaution so that all US central-banking
operations would not be on a hurricane-prone coast.
The move received very little coverage.
(Only MSM organization reporting it was Reuters.)
Besides selling commodities and derivatives that central banks might naturally want to
trade in (such as gold by which they manipulate the price of gold in order to secure their
proprietary product — money), the CME sells futures on US stocks.
The algorithms used by the bots that now do 80% of the driving in the US stock market
peer into futures like a fortune teller looking into her crystal ball.
So, the CME offers a lot of leverage for moving stock prices by steering the bots.
The largest investors the CME markets its operations to are central banks.
The CME has a program specifically designed to entice central banks and to facilitate
their purchases through discounted fees.
That program doesn't even try to hide its purpose as it is called the "Central Bank
Incentive Program."
Incentive programs are reserved for the CMEs highest volume traders.
This past January, the CME wrote the following marketing summary of its Central Bank Incentive
Program:
The Central Bank Incentive Program ("CBIP") allows Qualified Participants [notice the
caps, indicating the term has a legal definition] to receive discounted fees for their proprietary
trading of CME Group Products.
(CME Group)
They legally define "Qualified Participants" as
A non-US central bank, multilateral development bank, multilateral financial institution … or
an international organization of central banks.
[Said institutions must] execute all trades in the Qualified Participants name.
After all, you wouldn't want a proxy using the name of the ultimate money source if that
were the Fed or if it were acting on behalf of the Fed.
You wouldn't want the Fed's name in any way associated with the trade.
Did the Fed move its markets group to the same place as the CME in order to develop
proxy trading relationships with all of the central banks in the world that use the CME
for trading in oil and stock futures?
Strangely, not a single central bank on earth shows any CME products on its balance sheet;
but surely the CME does not have this dedicated program for the sake of serving no one.
Since CME incentive programs are reserved for the CME's highest-volume traders (basically
offering a bulk discount), central banks must be purchasing CME products and not disclosing
so on their balance sheets.
Why the apparent secrecy on the part of central banks as to their participation?
Not long after the Fed's move to CME Land, Zero Hedge reported finding this little tidbit
in one of the job descriptions at the Fed's new market trading office: "Perform account
services to foreign central banks, international agencies, and U.S. government agencies."
Hmm.
The CME group requires that central banks open accounts in their own name but that those
accounts must be managed by a …
CME Group clearing firm or FCM (Futures Commission Merchant) for their proprietary trades and/or
trades done on their behalf by an asset manager.
I wonder if people working in the Federal Reserves "markets group" engaged in "account
services to foreign central banks" could serve as asset managers for a central bank
with an account at the CME."
Just wondering.
In which case, might they not help manage those central banks' purchases in a manner
that serves the aims of the Federal Reserve?
Just a thought.
Maybe the Fed is just nearby to counsel them or urge them or provide incentives to make
certain stock trades at certain times.
Maybe the Fed's move to the place where central banks of the world trade at a time
when central banks buying stocks in the US has become a new phenomenon is all one big
coincidence.
Regardless, central banks are clearly engaged in massive US stock trades.
You don't get those bulk fee discounts any other way.
According to the Reuters article above,
The satellite office in the Midwest readies the New York Fed for perhaps the most delicate
U.S. interest-rate hike ever.
With rates having been near zero for more than six years, and markets flooded with reserves,
the Fed will rely on an array of new tools to help it tighten policy, likely later this
year.
MAYBE the move had less to do with fear created by Hurricane Sandy than it had to do with
establishing the new tools that would help the New York Fed achieve intervention readiness
for managing its first interest-rate increase without crashing stocks.
I suppose one way to safely avoid a market crash when making your much-feared first interest-rate
increase would be to get other central banks to jump in with rescue stock purchases if
the stock market dared to respond negatively.
Remember how the market leaped upward for a few days after the first increase?
Was that the central banks jumping in before their new machine was fully calibrated or
maybe giving a more-than-necessary boost just to err' on the safe side?
We may never know, but we now certainly do know that central banks trade US stocks and
a lot of it.
We also know the CME's "incentive" program for facilitating central bank stock futures
trades (and other kinds of trade) was created in July of 2013, so it, too, is a recent innovation.
Interestingly, the program lists one of its core principles as "Prevention of Market
Disruption."
("Plunge Protection Team," anyone?)
Another sliver of proof comes from the Bank of Finland, which states that it started buying
stocks in 2014, still a recent innovation and that it plans to ramp that up:
"When yields started to get really low and closer to zero in 2014, we decided to start
equity investments," said Jarno Ilves, head of investments at the Bank of Finland, who
said he plans to increase his allocation to stocks.
(Zero Hedge)
Oh, a couple of other parts of that job description:
Interfaces with market participants to obtain context for asset price movements….
Relates developments in financial markets to issues pertaining to financial stability.…
Plans and executes transactions in foreign exchange or fixed income markets on behalf
of the U.S. monetary authorities, foreign central banks, and other customers.
Would those "market participants" be the central banks that are the "Qualified Participants"
in the CME's incentive program, and would the "asset price movements" be intentionally
targeted asset price movements, and not just observations of natural market movements?
Just asking.
Follow the money to see where central-bank rigging of sticks all ends up
The precarious part of this equation is what it shows of the Law of Diminishing returns
that I keep harping about as an economic fundamental that cannot be averted even by central banks.
The further we have gone into the "recovery," the greater the amount of global stimulus
that has been needed to keep the recovery afloat and the more direct and broad the intervention
has had to become.
There is no global reduction of stimulus so far.
The only thing that has shifted is where the stimulus is coming from.
I have always stated that the recovery program is completely unsustainable and that all signs
of life end as soon as the artificial life support is removed.
The patient has been dead since 2008.
We have gone from the Fed and/or US Treasury buying stocks to save a few key companies
(an innovation at the time that was worrisome to many) to numerous central banks buying
up large swaths of the market.
The stock intervention has become greater, not smaller, because of the Law of Diminishing
returns.
You have to ask yourself, as I did about Carmageddon, "What is the end game here?"
What happens when central banks need to unwind from these positions and, so, start to flood
the market with these stocks.
I think the answer is they can no more do that than they can bring their recovery to
a successful conclusion (hence the continued massive stimulus a decade after it all began,
even as they talk of unwinding).
It is absurd that anyone thinks the Fed is unwinding successfully when everyone else
has been maintaining or increasing stimulus and when much of that flows to the US.
To see where this all goes, we have only to look at Japan where, again, the Law of Diminishing
Returns erodes endlessly at their goals.
Japan entered the game of rigging its stock market back in the 1990s, and it is still
as desperately stuck in this liquidity trap as ever.
There is no end game.
A recent poll of currency reserve managers at reserve banks showed that 80% of the 18
central banks polled plan to increase their investment in stocks.
That was almost double the number of those interested in buying corporate bonds.
These people are flying by the seats of their pants to go where no man (or one Yellen) has
ever gone before.
They are trying to figure their way out as they go, just like Japan, which finds itself
endlessly pitched back into new and greater rounds of QE every time it tries to taper.
As a result, the Bank of Japan has now become one of the top-five owners in eighty-one companies
on the Japan Nikkei 225 index and is close to being the number-one owner in fifty of
those companies.
(Effectively nationalizing those stocks.)
The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has been purchasing assets including exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
and thus, indirectly, company stocks….
From a policy perspective, efforts to weaken Japan's currency by lowering interest rates
to negative levels has not worked and has attracted criticism, particularly from financial
institutions.
It seems that now the emphasis will be on weakening the yen as well as propping up stock
prices.
In the parlance of the gambling community, the BOJ has become the biggest "whale"
in the market, holding a large share of stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Market.
Therefore, many investors have become increasingly focused not on company fundamentals but on
the BOJ's daily purchases….
It's estimated that the BOJ now owns about 60% of Japan's domestic ETFs and it's
expected the BOJ could continue purchasing more ETFs through 2017….
Market bulls are happy with the BOJ purchases, but opponents say the central bank is artificially
inflating valuations and ironically discouraging companies from becoming more efficient.
Interestingly, Japan's Nikkei 225 Stock Average is actually down more than 8% year-to-date
[diminishing returns, anyone?], although one might argue its fate could have been worse
without central-bank buying….
Of course, the BOJ's program is not unique.
The Bank of England has a corporate debt purchase program worth about US$13 billion, and the
European Central Bank has a similar program.
(Franklin Templeton Investments)
The Bank of Japan is already buying ETFs at an annual pace of 300 billion yen ($2.4 billion),
in addition to its existing annual purchase program worth about 3 trillion yen.
The Swiss, Israeli and Hong Kong central banks have also been or are small-scale investors
in stock markets, but more aggressive buying may now be called for….
This could mean ramping up purchases of Japanese stocks to 10 percent of the outstanding total,
or about 50 trillion yen, from around 0.5 percent currently.
Such a move would contribute to "pushing up equity prices….
"If the BOJ expands its ETF purchasing plan in June or July, then that could be the trigger
for the ECB to look more closely at this," said JP Morgan's Panigirtzoglou.
Purchasing stocks would also go some way to supporting bank valuations, which have been
hammered in recent months by the low and negative yields and a dismal first quarter trading
environment.
(Reuters)
The hope of central banks is to create a self-sustaining illusion, wherein people will see a market
that appears healthy and growing and then jump in and take off where the central bank
leaves off.
As we can see from Japan, the results are not that positive, and the illusion certainly
has never become self-sustaining.
It is more of delusion.
No central bank has navigated its way out of this so far.
China, for having done the same thing, is probably worse off than Japan, truth be known
beyond the always-deceptive cover of its double bookkeeping system.
You see, at the end of the day, this is not just stock manipulation; it is CYA time.
The Fed's recovery is a failure because it was never sustainable from its onset.
It was a bankrupt idea.
For the recovery to be called a success, GDP would have to have improved, and it has done
nothing but doggedly follow a downward path for years.
CLEARLY NOT A RECOVERY!
GDP growth well that is now under 2% can hardly be called "recovery."
The end game was supposed to be that a thriving economy would be able to absorb the Fed's
very gradual unwinding, but that vital economy never emerged.
The central banks have painted themselves into a corner.
By their own designs, they get no interest off all the bonds they hold.
They cannot sell them without substantially raising the interest on the national debts
of the nations they are obligated by charter to serve.
(The ECB now owns 40% of Europe's national debts.)
So, they buy stocks to maintain the illusion of recovery and to have someplace to put the
money they keep on their balance sheets.
Then they cannot sell those without crashing their own stock markets.
So, the game continues to spiral upward in terms of the aggregate of CB investments … as
seen in Japan and in China and now the US.
Some call it the liquidity trap.
History of central banks buying stocks
Twenty years ago central banks didn't even think of buying stocks.
It may have happened in odd instances, but it was an anomaly if it did as a way to save
a specific bank or credit union.
During our first plunge into the Great Recession, the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury bought
up large amounts of stock in order to save companies that were either vital to US employment
or to financial markets that were dying from their own mistakes.
Those were efforts to save specific key corporations.
In subsequent years, the Bank of Japan and the Peoples Bank of China soaked up stocks
in massive amounts more or less across the board, not to save specific vital companies
but to save their stock markets.
The Chinese seized total central control of their market, even mandating that certain
speculators stay out of the market, mandating that various proxies buy large volumes of
stocks and locking the stocks that were falling worst out of trading.
As a result, they created a perfectly healthy and real stock market, right?
No, they created a centrally controlled illusion that is not a free market at all; it is merely
a fatalistically predetermined game in which the government has decided "the market,"
a term that now requires air quotes, will do well.
To achieve that end, the government or its central bank does whatever it needs to in
order to keep stocks up.
We all know China's market became completely rigged.
We are just now seeing in the mainstream media that the US stock market is also increasingly
rigged by central banks buying stocks.
What about the official reason banks give for central banks buying stocks?
The main reason presented for central banks buying stocks is that all of their economic
stimulus has resulted in hugely bloated balance sheets, and they need to invest that money
somewhere.
To which, I ask, "Why?
When did making a profit become an operating objective of central banks, which like to
claim they are not about profit making?"
Since central banks are the first to claim they are not about making profits, that is
a completely illegitimate reason for buying stocks; but that's the CYA reason banksters
give: According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, nearly $11 trillion in global assets
yielded negative interest last year.
Thus, central banks are forced to reach for yield in riskier assets like everyone else.
Really?
That was all their doing.
Central banks created that situation intentionally, and the Federal Reserve has been saying it
wants to unwind its balance sheet.
If so, why does it want to make bigger profits on the money it supposedly wants to unwind?
It's a completely self-contradictory argument.
Yet, the experts are readily buying into it.
If you buy their argument, then you have to admit that central-bank policies are hurting
the central banks just like they are hurting retirees and everyone else who needs yield
in order to survive But why does the bank, which has the power to print money at will,
care about earning it the hard way?
No, I think it is really entirely about propping up their own stock markets.
We know that is why Japan and China have been doing it.
Why would the US be any different, even if the Fed hides behind proxies?
In the National Bank of Switzerland's case, a different reason altogether is presented,
which has some truth to it: The Swiss franc is hugely popular when times are bad.
When everyone wants to buy francs, the value of the franc is driven up relative to other
currencies, which makes it hard for Swiss companies to compete for international trade.
To offset this, the Swiss National Bank tries to buy up other currencies.
They have to put the foreign money somewhere, so they are investing it in top US companies.
In proportion to the size of its national economy, the Swiss National Bank's balance
sheet is the most bloated of any major central bank … and still growing with no end in
sight.
A convenient alignment of Fed interests with francish interests.
The risks from central banks investing in stocks
With central banks having the capacity to create money by decree anytime they want to,
investment risk means little to nothing.
Lose your money, it ceases to exist.
In that case, just create more of it.
With their ability to create unlimited amounts at zero cost (just add some ones and zeros
to an account somewhere), their capacity to move markets they choose to invest in is almost
unlimited.
Essentially, the only limit on how much they can do is inflation, which throughout the
Great Recession has never posed as a limiting factor.
If central banks are allowed keep buying stocks as they have been doing, they have the power
to nationalize companies and take central control of economies.
It also means there is a tail risk that nations that heavily invest in US stocks could for
political reasons order their central banks to dump their hoards and flush the US stock
market down the toilet of history.
They may not be likely to do that, but it certainly opens that possibility.
To those who say, "They would never do that because they would lose so much money,"
central banks don't have to care!
As Zero Hedge wrote at the beginning of this year,
For those few who are still unfamiliar, this is how central banks who create fiat money
out of thin air and for whom "acquisition cost" is a meaningless term, are increasingly
nationalizing the equity capital markets.
As the WSJ puts it "these central banks care relatively little about whether such
investments make profits or losses—though they can matter politically—because they
can always print more of their currency.
So risk is less important, analysts say."
And since risk was no longer part of the equation, leaving only return, central banks started
buying stocks….
So between central banks outbidding each other to buy "risky" assets with "money"
that is constantly created at no cost, very soon all other private investors will be crowded
out but not before every stock is trading at valuations that even CNBC guests won't
be able to justify….
The bad news, is that as more people realize that a free "market" now only exists in
textbooks, and that Soviet-style central planning is the only game in town, confident in price
formation will evaporate, in turn pushing even more market participants out of the quote-unquote
market, until only central banks are left bidding on each other's otherwise worthless
stock certificates.
At the same time, efforts to invest reserve funds more broadly mean that more markets
will be subject to what some critics describe as central-bank distortion, as large and often
price-insensitive buyers run the risk of driving up prices and reducing prospective returns
for other market participants.
For virtually all central banks, however, the grotesque central planning shift of the
past decade means that instead of engaging in monetary policy, the world's central
banks are now activist hedge funds, who are focused first and foremost on "investment
management."
… and at the current rate of expansion, within a few years the world's monetary
authorities who are tasked with "financial stability", will have acquired a majority
of the world's equity tranche, effectively nationalizing it.
Even the Wall Street Journal denies the argument that central banks have to care at all about
making a profit.
As Russia became more of a free-market economy, the United States has started to look more
like the centrally-planned economy of the former Soviet Union.
Markets have been centrally manipulated beyond the repair.
As always, the central planners have the arrogance of the elite that causes them to think they
have the brilliance to guide and control the markets of entire nations and even the entire
world.
How can anyone believe that such hubris will not end in total financial collapse?
Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the WorldThe Alchemists:
Three Central Bankers and a World on FireCentral Banking: Theory and Practice in Sustaining
Monetary and Financial Stability (Wiley Finance)Escape from the Central Bank Trap: How to Escape
From the $20 Trillion Monetary Expansion Unharmed
-------------------------------------------
Did Love Island's Mike just confirm he did have sex with Jess? - Duration: 2:51.
Did Love Island's Mike just confirm he did have sex with Jess?
The Love Island hunk is relishing in the uproar, despite denying theyd spent the night together just hours after being booted from the villa.
It was thought that Jess – who is currently with Dom Leaver who remains in the villa – went back to Mikes room after a night of partying.
The duo denied reports and even headed to Love Islands spin-off, Aftersun, to set the record straight.
However, the pair were set for even more backlash as on the show Jess appeared to have her hand on Mikes knee as the camera caught them.
There were also fresh claims that the duo partied the night together again before heading back to Jess hotel room. JUST FRIENDS: Mike and Jess insist theyve never had sex.
Mike has now added more fuel to the blaze with his Twitter post. A fan tweeted a meme of a man with a shocked look on his face.
It was captioned: Mike when Chloe turns up at his front door while hes banging Jess..
RUMOURS: Mike seemingly brought more life to the rumour on Twitter.
Love Islands sex scenes Warning, this may contain scenes of a sexual nature. A couple of weeks on Love Island doesnt stop the islanders indulging in intimate play before bed.
Check out this gallery on all the sex scenes performed so far 1 / 11 Alex Bowen enjoys a quick massage before sleep .
LOVE ISLAND PALS: Mike and Jess are rumoured to have spent the night together again.
Mike shared the tweet before adding a crying laughing emoji. Fans were quick to speculate on the tweets meaning, with one follower warning him that hed get people talking. Sure enough it did, with many now unsure of his relationship with Jess.
Love Islands Jessica Shears hottest pictures Love Islands Jessica Shears hottest pictures. 1 / 35 .
DRAMA: Jess is still dating Dom despite the fact hes still on the show. If there is anything between Mike and Jess its about to be dashed. Its rumoured that Mike will be going back into the villa to shake things up.
Daily Star Online has contacted both Mike and Jess reps for comment. Love Island continues tonight on ITV2 at 9pm.
-------------------------------------------
Where have I been? - Update - Duration: 14:22.
For more infomation >> Where have I been? - Update - Duration: 14:22. -------------------------------------------
Bikemore won't have to bike less: Bike lane to stay in Canton - Duration: 2:06.
BIKEMORE NOW HAS A SEAT AT THE
TABLE WHEN THE CITY DISCUSSES
TRANSPORTATION ISSUES.
THE POTOMAC STREET PROTECTED
BIKE LANE LIVES.
THE CITY AND BIKEMORE, A CYCLING
ADVOCACY GROUP HAVE REACHED A
SETTLEMENT.
BIKEMORE SUED THE CITY AFTER
OFFICIALS ANNOUNCED PLANS TO
DISMANTLE THE LANE CITING
CONCERNS EMERGENCY VEHICLES
COULD NOT FIT BETWEEN THE CURB
AND LANE.
>> WE RAISED THIS ISSUE IN THE
FIRST PLACE BECAUSE WE WERE
CONCERNED THE CITY WAS TAKING A
STEP BACKWARDS, AWAY FROM A SAFE
PROTECTED TWO WAY BIKE LANE.
REPORTER: THE BIKE LANE STAYS,
ON STREET PARKING WILL BE ON AN
ANGLE.
WE WILL PROTECT THAT BIKE LANE.
IT WILL NOT BE REMOVED AND IF WE
ANGLE PARK WE WILL PROVIDE
EMERGENCY VEHICLES THE ACCESS
THEY NEED.
THE SETTLEMENT COMES AS BOTH
SIDES GEARED UP FOR A COURT
BATTLE.
BIKE RIDERS FILLED THE
COBBLESTONE PLAZA IN BETWEEN THE
COURTHOUSES DOWNTOWN THANKING
SUPPORTERS OF THEIR CAUSE.
>> IT IS A SMALL VICTORY IN WHAT
WE KNOW IS GOING TO BE A LONGER
AND LARGER FIGHT.
OUR WORK IS TO ENSURE THAT
EVERYBODY WHO LIVES IN
BALTIMORE, NO MATTER WHAT
NEIGHBORHOOD, HAS THE CHOICE TO
COMFORTABLY AND SAFELY USE
BICYCLES TO GET WHERE THEY NEED
TO GO.
REPORTER: THAT BIGGER FIGHT IS
TO MAKE BALTIMORE MORE BIKE
FRIENDLY.
THE NEXT PHASE TAKES THE ISSUE
TO WEST BALTIMORE WHERE THERE IS
A BIKE LANE PLAN IN PLACE BUT NO
FUNDING.
>> WE WANT TO WORK WITH THE CITY
TO FIND CREATIVE WAYS TO GET
THAT FUNDING TO PUT IN PLACE THE
BIKE NETWORK ON THE WEST SIDE
THAT IS ULTIMATELY GOING TO
CONNECT THE ENTIRE CITY.
>> WE ARE VERY HAPPY WITH THE
COOPERATION THAT WE RECEIVED
FROM THE CITY AND WE LOOK
FORWARD WORKING WITH THE CITY ON
A FORWARD LOOKING BASIS TO
ACHIEVE A BIKEABLE AND SAFETY
CITY FOR EVERYONE.
REPORTER: NEIGHBORS ARE UPSET
THEY ARE NOT PART OF THE
CONVERSATION.
500 PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED A
PETITION SEEKING AN AUDIENCE
WITH THE NEIGHBORS.
BIKEMORE EXPECTS TO FINALIZE THE
SETTLEMENT THIS WEEK.
THERE WILL BE A TWO WEEK PUBLIC
COMMENT PERIOD BEFORE THE CITY
MAKES ANY CHANGES TO THE STREET.
-------------------------------------------
Diamond 4 Taric one trick gameplay, solo queue #2. We have a tilted Jungler D: - Duration: 25:07.
Here's a tip, if your mouse has extra buttons you should put your redemption and locket on your mouse instead of your keyboard so you're not reaching over.
-------------------------------------------
Hey, Amy! (Thanks and I have a Question) - Duration: 2:48.
Yesterday, you said you were waiting to hear from me.
And I know you were speaking generically. But I thought. What do I got to do to get my face on her screen?
My face on her screen.
I'm not asking for five minutes. I'm just asking for two.
Hey, Amy! I've been watching what you've been doing. Yeah.
I've been listening to your podcast. I watch your videos.
I even caught you on a couple of Tim Schmoyer's shows.
I'm not asking for five minutes. I'm just asking for one.
I'm not asking for five minutes. But, thanks for all you've done.
If you were starting over today. If you were starting over today.
What would you do differently? What would you do differently?
I'm just asking cuz I'm... Not asking for five minutes. I'm just asking for one.
I'm not asking for five minutes I'm just asking for one.
If you were starting over.
If you were starting over.
If you were starting over what would you do?
I just want you to know that somebody in Texas is thinking of you.
And I hope you're having a good day in Ohio.
I hope you're having a good day in Ohio.
Hey, Amy!
Hey, Amy! You're doing so great. And I just...
Hey, Amy! I just wanna say thanks, you know?
Hey, Amy! Hey, Amy! Hey, Amy! Thanks a lot!
I'll see you around.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Will Have Speaking Role In Disney's Hall Of Presidents - Duration: 0:43.
WELCOME BACK NOW ALL NEW AT
5:30 DISNEY IS TRYING TO QUIET
THE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING THE
DELAY AND THE REOPENING OF
THEIR FAMOUS HALL OF
PRESIDENT'S EXHIBIT.
THE ATTRACTION HAS BEEN SHUT
DOWN FOR MONTHS WHILE THE PARK
ADDS PRESIDENT TRUMP.
IT WAS SLATED TO REOPEN THIS
MONTH AND NOW DISNEY SAYS THEY
WILL REOPEN LATER ON IN THE
YEAR.
THEN PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL BE
SPEAKING JUST LIKE HIS
PREDECESSORS.
ALSO A PART OF THE RENOVATION
IS A FEW MANY SOUND SYSTEM,
LIGHTING, AND HD PRODUCTION
SYSTEM.
DISNEY DIRECTED THE HALL OF
PRESIDENT'S FEATURE AFTER A
VICE NEWS ARTICLE CLAIMING
THERE WAS SOME DISCORD AT
DISNEY ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP'S
APPEARANCE.
-------------------------------------------
You have an identical but Mystics Demonic Doppelganger twin - Duration: 1:20.
The existence of so-called Doppelgangers and spirit doubles is an ancient and widespread
belief.
Doppelganger is a German term which means the evil twin.
Mystics throughout the ages have believed Doppelgangers and spirit doubles are supernatural
creatures.
They are either spiritual copies of the person or downright demonic twins.
It is believed that every individual has an identical but demonic twin that roams a parallel
universe doing and experiencing the same things such as talking to family, working at a job
etc.
The awareness of such an entity becomes prominent when the person starts seeing his or her doppelganger
which happens during deathful sickness or post disaster.
It also dawned on researchers that somewhat explains the phenomena of déjà vu and an
extra unseen presence which is the twin that is following us everywhere and materializes
only when something uneventful or extremely grave befalls the individual.
-------------------------------------------
Uptick In Road Rage Incidents Have Drivers On Edge - Duration: 2:18.
WE'RE LIVE IN LANCASTER KEN
MOLESTINA CBS11 NEWS.
HOPING AND PRAYING, THANK
YOU.
THREE SHOOTINGS IN NORTH
TEXAS IN LESS THAN A WEEK.
TONIGHT POLICE ARE ON HIGH
ALERT HOPING TO PUT A STOP TO
WHAT IS SEEMINGLY INCREASING
VIOLENCE BEHIND THE WHEEL.
JEFF PAUL LIVE IN ARLINGTON
WITH THE MESSAGE OFFICERS WANT
SENT.
Reporter: TWO OF THE
SHOOTINGS RESULTED IN CLOSE
CALLS WHERE THE VICTIMS ARE
EXPECTED TO SURVIVE.
BUT THE THIRD AS YOU SEE ENDED
MUCH DIFFERENTLY WITH A DEATH.
POLICE SAY MOST OF THE TIME
THESE CASES CAN BE PREVENTED.
IT TAKES A SECOND OR TWO FOR
THINGS TO GO BAD.
Reporter: WE'VE SEEN A SHARP
UPTICK.
THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED IT
FIRSTHAND.
HE CAME UP TO THE WINDOW
BANGING ON IT.
I ROLLED DOWN LIKE WHAT'S THE
PROBLEM?
AND THEN POP HE HIT ME.
IT WAS 12 YEARS AGO WHEN HE WAS
A RECRUIT, BUT THE MEMORY STUCK
WITH HIM.
BUT THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED IN
MESQUITE, ARLINGTON, NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, IN THE SPAN OF
JUST A FEW DAYS.
IT'S A LOT EASIER TO GET
UPSET WHEN YOU HAVE SEVERAL
THOUSAND POUNDS OF METAL AROUND
YOU.
Reporter: GIVING YOURSELF
PLENTY OF TIME TO GET FROM
POINT A TO B IS HIS NUMBER ONE
TIP.
HE ALSO SAYS USE YOUR BLINKER
AND DON'T DRIVE SLOW IN THE
LEFT LANE.
ULTIMATELY IT COMES DOWN TO
JUST HAVING COURTESY.
Reporter: IF YOU FIND
YOURSELF ON THE RECEIVING END,
SLOW DOWN AND LET THE ANGRY
DRIVER PASS.
DON'T MAKE EYE CONTACT.
THAT'S THE LAST THING WE
WANT TO DO IN THESE SITUATIONS
TO CHALLENGE SOMEBODY.
Reporter: IF YOU CAN'T GET
AWAY FROM THE OTHER DRIVER AND
THEY FOLLOW YOU, POLICE SAY
CALL 911.
IF YOU CAN'T MAKE THAT CALL,
THEY SAY DRIVE TO A PUBLIC
PLACE LIKE A POLICE DEPARTMENT
OR FIRE STATION.
HE DOESN'T EXPECT THE RAGE TO
SIMMER, NOT UNTIL OUR ATTITUDES
DO BEHIND THE WHEEL.
THE ONE THING, YOU KNOW, YOU
CANNOT GET BACK IS YOUR HEALTH,
YOUR SAFETY, YOUR LIFE.
Reporter: AND NOW THE POLICE
OFFICERS WE SPOKE WITH THEY
TEND TO SEE MORE ROAD RAGE AND
CONSTRUCTION ZONES.
THEY ALSO SAY CELL PHONES CAN
BE A FACTOR AND ALSO AN INFLUX
OF NEW TRANSPLANTS TO TEXAS
COULD ALSO ADD TO TENSIONS.
-------------------------------------------
15% rabat i 24 timer - skal du have noget med? - Duration: 0:31.
For more infomation >> 15% rabat i 24 timer - skal du have noget med? - Duration: 0:31. -------------------------------------------
Have a record and having hard time finding quality employment? Check out this video! - Duration: 13:08.
hi everyone my name is Jamelah Henry aka professional career coach if you're on
Instagram you can follow me at professional career coach and it's an
underscore after professional and after career if you are a new member to the
group I want to welcome you aboard my name is Jamelah Henry once again and I am
the creator of the group job seekers guide to career success the reason for
starting this group I started it probably about a month ago a little
background about myself I am the president of something new staffing and
training services located in Wilmington Delaware and I do recruitment I do
hiring things of that nature and some frustrations that I had that came along
with you know my job responsibilities I have 13 years in management and
I've dealt with a lot of job seekers over the years and a lot of people went about
finding jobs interviewing and submitting resumes and things of that nature
incorrectly so I decided to start this group to share behind-the-scenes
information that most recruiters probably wouldn't tell you so welcome
aboard and if you want to find out more information there's an intro video from
May 23rd you can check that out to get more knowledge about myself
and the group but this live this video actually is for people who may have
trouble finding quality work quality employment and they have a past record
that they may have a hard time getting rid of if you aren't familiar with
expungements pardons you may want to google in your area how to go about
getting that done if you have looked into it and you're not eligible then
this video most likely will probably be for you but if you haven't looked into
it look into it I can tell you for the state of Delaware one resource is the
APEX program it's A-P-E-X and they assist people free of charge with expunging
their records and pardons if you are in Delaware at the Wilmington public
library across from rodney square the apex program there's a coordinator that comes
into the library every Wednesday between 9:30
and 11 and this person helps people they take walk-ins and they help people go
about having their records removed they tell you the steps what you need
to do and all the type of paperwork that you need to fill out to have this
process completed so if you are in Wilmington go to the Wilmington public
library on Wednesdays between 9:30 and 11:00 and they do walk-ins and to get
more information about clearing your record but for the people who cannot do
that or even for the people who haven't looked and had a chance to look into it
I want to share some tips on how you can make good money even if you have a
record so the first thing I want to share is have you thought about starting
a business? have you thought about what you're actually good at and
been able to sell it? so find out what are you good at what is it that you can
do that other people have a hard time doing what is it that you can do that
you get a lot of compliments on? what is it that you can do that it's easy for
you it comes natural to you? think about what you're able to do everyone has a
talent a gift no matter how small or big that it may be find out what you're
good at and start using that as a way to build a source of income so let's say
for example you're good at designing t-shirts you can make custom shirts
start doing that now let's say you are able to design customized sneakers you
can do that let's say you are you know how to build stuff mix things together
you can build do colognes or maybe shampoos or hair treatments whatever the
case may be I'm just using those as an example but whatever you're good at
use that perfect it market it and start selling it so you can start marketing on
social media if you know anyone who is good with social media marketing use
that to market sure whatever that is that you're good at and social media is
free so you can use that as a free resource so you're not really putting a
lot of money out to make money off of this so whatever it is that you're good
at find your niche it can be something that
someone already does but what you want to do is get take that what they do and
add on and build onto it make yours unique make yours different so find out
what it is that you're good at brainstorm some of you may already know
what you're good at and you just have it sitting idle
and you just do it for yourself but you don't do it for other people so make
that a way to generate income but the thing about it is you want to perfect it
you don't want to just have a talent and you just go straight into the market and
try to sell it no you want to research you want to perfect it you want to make
sure that it's in good standing you want to make sure that everything all the
components come together as a whole before you start marketing it to people
and once you get that thing together and market it meaning all the components
together you did your research then you start marketing it to people and you
start making money you may only make five dollars off of it and you may next
make ten dollars off of it I think Steve Harvey did a video if you can if you're
on Facebook you can type in in the search button Steve Harvey motivation
video about some small businesses or something like that just type it in
you'll see it'll come up it's like a ten minute video where he talks about people
taking one little thing that they know how to do and starting off small and
then eventually get into a million dollar so check that video out but you
are one of those people you are one of those people who can take something that
you're good at market it and then sell on it but once again you want to perfect
it you want to make sure that it's it's it's good enough to go to the market so
that's one way that you could get around having a record and another thing
about that is you definitely want to become legit once you start marketing
and making money so you can get a business license I think they're like
125 to get started and they're like $75 a year
so you can get a business license to make sure that you're legit and then you
can run a business there's a lot of people actually you know millionaires
out here who actually have a background and that's what they
decided to do they decided okay no one else don't wanna hire me so I'm gonna
hire myself and that can be you too you know you just have to have the confidence
and you got to put in the time you got to put in a dedication you got to put in
the research you have to do those things in order for it to be successful and it
continue and you can do this while you're working a minimum-wage job and
you can do this on the side to the point where you make enough money where you
can quit that job you know so that's one way of being able to have a high quality
job making good money and another one more point I just want to add to that is
you can create your own hours you its flexibility in that so you're not
boggled down to someone else's schedule another thing you can do which is
something that most people do is get a job so you may say well I have a job so
I am able to get a job but get a job in a field that you could actually make
good money from so let's use IT for an example so you if you're good with
computers IT is one of the most sought-after
fields that employers are looking for people in - 1) not too many people go to
school for IT not too many people have these technical skills this background
so if you have a background that's not pleasing but employers see that you have
great computer skills then they most likely give you a second chance because
they need you you know especially with its 2017 it's about to be you know
we're about to go into the future the you know they're talking about robots
and things like that employers need people to operate behind the scenes they
need people with good computer skills that they need people with technology
minds that know how to drive forward their companies so if you have a background
they most likely will be willing to give you a second chance if you come through
and are able to really prove yourself to them now they may not accept anyone that
may have a background when it relates to theft violence or
something like that but other type of backgrounds they may accept but if
it's anything related to like computer crimes or something like that they may
not accept you but outside of that you have a good chance of getting a job in
the IT field so find employers find companies who are looking to hire IT
people maybe a startup company a start-up IT company they most likely
will probably hire you to come on board with them and they make anywhere between
$18 and $33 an hour another job that's you and I'm just
going to name these two but there's a lot of other jobs that you could look
into but the second one is going into the electrical field so if you don't
know but a lot of ex-convicts actually own electrical companies the reason why
is because that is one of the industries that people who have a background are
able to get into so what a lot of people did was who ex-convicts is they have
their own companies they have their own businesses and what they're willing to
do is hire people who have a background because someone gave them a chance so
what they're doing is they're offering to give someone else the chance
because they know the struggle they know you know what it took for them to get
get a job and electrical people they make anywhere between $15 to $26
dollars an hour what you want to do is you're wanna find a company that offers
a paid training find a company that offers paid training it'll be free so that'll
be on the employers tab I actually know a few people who actually went through
an internship I'm mean a apprenticeship and they are in the electrical field and
they're making pretty good money so look into jobs that's in an electrical field
I'm not gonna start calling out companies but start going onto Google
and look up free paid training for electrical jobs and see what comes up in
your area put your state in see what comes up in your area and see if you are
able to locate something in your area and reach out to these people don't
email call pick up the phone go there you know on a door if you
go to these companies and they see that you're serious then they'll
take you on give you a shot but you want to prove that you you want this you want
to make sure that you are doing something to make yourself stand out
from other people so there are people a lot of people who have
records so and you're all competing with each other so it's
important that you stand out from the other people so if you find something go
to the place you know go to the place say hey I'm looking for work
I'm willing to be trained this is a field that I'm highly interested in and
this is what I can do for you so sell yourself to them but do it in person
because that will make you stand out from the next person who is looking for
the same type of job and then lastly you want to make sure that your resume is in
order even if you have gaps of employment get with a professional
someone that can help you get through have your resume designed to the point
that it'll be appealing to employers "okay I understand he has a background okay, I
understand she has a background" so you want to set your resume up to the point
where it's not getting rejected time after time after time so have a nice
professionally done resume even if you have gaps in your resume you want to
still work on something towards you still want to work towards getting
yourself in front of the employers and what you want to do is you want to have
your resume you know professionally done or you want to go online and look at
things to spruce your resume up the goal is standing out from your competition
that's the number one goal so once again the IT field is a good field to go into
electrical make $15 to $26 a hour and then start your own
business what is your niche? what can you do that other people have a hard time
doing but it comes natural to you? So anyone who may be on this path who may
be having a hard time good luck I know it's not easy but you will get
there but the point is you have to invest into yourself
alright have a good day bye
-------------------------------------------
If You Have A Pineapple Drink Every Morning | This is What Happens to Your Eyes and Joints - Duration: 3:22.
pineapple drinks, pineapple drinks,
pineapple drinks, pineapple drinks,
pineapple drinks,
-------------------------------------------
Unknown Mass Extinction May Have Killed Mighty Megalodon - Duration: 0:58.
For more infomation >> Unknown Mass Extinction May Have Killed Mighty Megalodon - Duration: 0:58. -------------------------------------------
Snake antivenom: Which hospitals have them and how much it'll cost you - Duration: 2:56.
and avoid hassles.
ROBERT:CENTRAL TEXAS IS PRIME
BREEDING GROUND FOR
RATTLESNAKES AND "SUMMER" IS
THE HEIGHT OF SNAKE SEASON.BUT
FOR SOME PEOPLE, KNOWING THE
STEPS TO TAKE AFTER A BITE
ISN'T SO CLEAR. KXAN'S GIGI
CLOSER LOOK AT "WHERE TO GO"
AND "WHAT TO DO".
BRITT AND BRENDA MEEK LOVE
THE HILL COUNTRY VIEW FROM
THEIR BACK YARD IN LLANO.UNTIL
A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, WHEN
THEY SPOTTED SOMETHING THEY
NEVER WANTED TO SEE.BRIT MEEK:
"I WAS SO SCARED, AND SCREAMED
SO LOUD." // "IT WAS RIGHT BY
MY LEFT FOOT."THIS WAS IT. A
RATTLESNAKE LONGER THAN THEY
CARE TO RECOUNT AND IT'S NOT
THEIR FIRST SIGHTING OF ONE
EITHER.MEEK: "WE'VE SEEN NINE
OR 10 LITTLE BITTY ONES.
LITTLE BABIES BOUT LIKE THAT.
BUT, THAT'S THE FIRST TIME WE
SAW ONE THAT BIG."GIGI: "WHAT
CONCERNED THE MEEKS THE MOST:
IF THEY COME ACROSS ANOTHER
SNAKE AND ONE OF THEM IS
BITTEN. DO THEY HEAD STRAIGHT
TO THE ER OR CALL 911? THE
ANSWER WASN'T SO CLEAR."BRENDA
MEEK: "WE DON'T GET GOOD CELL
PHONE COVERAGE OUT HERE TO
CALL 911."DR. RYAN MCCORKLE:
"IF YOU'VE BEEN BITTEN BY A
SNAKE AND YOU'RE TRANSPORTED
BY 911, YOU'LL BE TRANSPORTED
TO A PLACE THAT HAS
ANTI-VENOM. IF YOU'RE DRIVING
YOURSELF, THAT'S ANOTHER
VARIABLE IN THE EQUATION OF
DID YOU DRIVE TO A PLACE THAT
DOESN'T STOCK ANTI-VENOM?"MOST
RATTLESNAKE BITES HAPPEN IN
JUNE, ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS
POISON CENTER NETWORK. AND
LAST YEAR, RATTLESNAKES STRUCK
MORE THAN 200 TIMES STATEWIDE.
ST. DAVID'S ER PHYSICIAN, DR.
RYAN MCCORKLE SAYS MOST LARGE
HOSPITALS HAVE THE ANTI-VENOM
STOCKED AND READY TO GO. HE
SAYS AFTER A BITE, DON'T TRY
TO MAKE THE SITUATION BETTER.
DR. MCCORKLE: "NO TOURNIQUET.
DON'T MAKE A CUT OVER IT AND
SUCK THE POISON OUT OF IT." //
"ALL OF THOSE OLD SCHOOL
METHODS HAVE BEEN PROVEN NOT
TO WORK. IT'S GET TO THE ER
AND GET THE ANTI-VENOM."GIGI
BARNETT, KXAN NEWS. ROBERT:
ANTI-VENOM CAN SAVE YOUR LIFE-
BUT IT DOESN'T COME CHEAP.EACH
VIAL COSTS ABOUT 25-HUNDRED
DOLLARS. AND TREATMENT
REQUIRES A FEW VIALS ON
AVERAGE.A PROFESSOR AT TEXAS A
AND M UNIVERSITY'S COLLEGE OF
VETERINARY MEDICINE SAYS IT IS
NOT UNCOMMON FOR MEDICAL BILLS
TO TOTAL 50-THOUSAND DOLLARS
OR MORE AFTER A BITE.HOW MUCH
OF THAT YOU END UP PAYING OUT
OF POCKET DEPENDS ON YOUR
INSURANCE. ROBERT:WE WANTED TO
KNOW HOW COMMON IT IS FOR
PEOPLE TO BE BITTEN BY SNAKES
- AND HOW OFTEN BITES BECOME
FATAL. THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
STATE HEALTH SERVICES SAYS
ONLY ABOUT 7-THOUSAND PEOPLE
ARE BITTEN BY RATTLESNAKES
ACROSS THE COUNTRY EACH YEAR.
ONLY POINT-2 PERCENT OF THOSE
PEOPLE DIE FROM THE BITES...
WHICH WORKS OUT TO ONE OUT OF
EVERY 500.IN TEXAS THAT MEANS
ONLY 1 OR 2 BITES BECOME FATAL
EACH YEAR - AND EXPERTS SAY
THAT'S USUALLY BECAUSE OF
TREATMENT".ROBERT:CENTRAL
TEXAS IS HOME TO A NUMBER OF
VENOMOUS SNAKES - NOT JUST
RATTLERS.TREATMENT DEPENDS ON
THE TYPE OF SNAKE AND CERTAIN
TYPES OF ANTI-VENOM ARE
BECOMING INCREASINGLY LESS
AVAILABLE.WE HAVE MORE ABOUT
WHY SUPPLIES ARE SHRINKING -
AND WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING
-------------------------------------------
WWE might have changed their SummerSlam and WrestleMania 34 plans - Duration: 4:30.
WWE might have changed their SummerSlam and WrestleMania 34 plans
We publish a whole lot of content here at Cageside Seats. We're also [looks around and whispers so the bosses can't hear] not the only place producing wrestling content on the internet.
So, as a service to you on the weekdays, we'll be producing a wrestling newsletter, Rude Awakening. Well, it will be a newsletter eventually: for now, it'll just be part of your experience here at Cageside, collecting the news, recaps, and social moments from the greater wrestling universe daily so you won't fall behind, with a newsletter format to come.
https://cdn. vox-cdn. com/thumbor/Q4PiuQRc0ZPbUfhy5w_tsRQBQSg=/0x0:1200x675/920x613/filters:focal(504x242:696x434):format(webp)/cdn. vox-cdn. com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55502805/20170324_WMBestMatches__f93dc100f5e9735bbbce0da6ba44ef310. jpg. We'll just cut right to the chase here: this edition of Rude Awakening is going to deal with rumors, which means potential spoilers.
So, if you don't want to see that discussion, just start scrolling straight to the bullets below to catch up on what's going on in the wrestling world.
Still here? Alright, so, rumors came out almost immediately following WrestleMania 33 that the plan for WrestleMania 34 was Roman Reigns vs.
Brock Lesnar, in a rematch from Mania 31 — this time, without Seth Rollins cashing in his Money in the Bank briefcase and taking the title for himself.
In between, thanks to Braun Strowman's rise and popularity and general awesomeness, we were likely to get Strowman vs.
It appears as if all of these plans have now been changed, and WWE is going to go in a number of different directions for both SummerSlam and Mania 34.
Dave Meltzer, in the Wrestling Observer Newsletter, discussed how it now appears that the plan for Mania is Reigns vs. John Cena — hence the John Cena, Free Agent thing they're promoting his return with.
To get there, Reigns is going to have to face Lesnar sooner, and that would happen at SummerSlam, which is why Reigns challenged the winner of Lesnar vs. Joe on a recent episode of RAW.
These plans could still change (or change back), but if WWE stays the course with these main event plans, there's a whole lot of shuffling that has to go on.
Where does Samoa Joe go after feuding with Lesnar, especially given how over he's gotten as a total badass in the lead-in to their match at Great Balls of Fire? Does this mean Braun Strowman is losing to Reigns in a feud that it seemed like he was going to win? Meltzer makes note of Joe specifically, saying he could be the reason plans change again, so we'll just have to wait and see.
As is, we're still two pay-per-views away from SummerSlam, and much further from the next Mania. But all of this gives fans plenty to think about in the meantime.
-------------------------------------------
Suspicious Fires In Sharon Have City On Edge - Duration: 2:00.
POLICE CATCH THE SHOOTER, CALL
CRIME STOPPERS.
POLICE IN MER SER MERCER
COUNTY ARE
OFFERING A REWARD RELATED TO
ARSON.
MANY HOMES HAVE BEEN SET ON FIRE
OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS.
Reporter: THERE'S GROWING
CONCERN IN THE CITY AFTER A RASH
OF SUSPICIOUS FIRES.
POLICE SAY AT LEAST 18 FIRES
HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY SET IN
VACANT HOMES OR ABANDONED
BUILDINGS IN THE WEST HILL
SECTION.
IT'S VERY SCARY.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HOUSE IS
GOING TO BE NEXT.
Reporter: THE FAMILY LIVES
IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE MANY
OF THE FIRES HAVE BECOME A
RECURRING NIGHTMARE.
MY LITTLE GIRL WAS LOOKING
OUT THE WINDOW.
SHE SAID, MOMMY, THE SUN IS
COMING OUT.
IT WAS 2:00 IN THE MORNING.
SO I KNEW THE SUN WASN'T COMING
OUT.
TESTIFY A FIRE.
Reporter: THE -- IT WAS A
FIRE.
Reporter: THE NEIGHBORHOOD
IS SCARRED.
IT'S TERRIFYING.
LAST TIME THIS FIRE HAPPENED,
THE WATER WAS HITTING ME.
THAT'S HOW CLOSE THE FLAMES WERE
TO MY HOUSE.
Reporter: HE THINKS IT MIGHT
NOT BE A BAD IDEA FOR THE CITY
TO TEAR DOWN SOME OF THE
ABANDONED HOUSES OR BOARD THEM
UP.
THE NEXT ONE IS VAK NTD AND
THE NEXT ONE BURNED DOWN.
Reporter: THIS HOUSE IS NO
LONGER HABITABLE.
BRIAN LIVES ACROSS THE STREET.
HE CALLED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
I HEARD A LOUD CRACKLING.
I LOOKED OUT, AND THE PORCH WERE
ON FIRE.
VERY SCARY CONSIDERING MY
PARENTS LIVE RIGHT THERE, I LIVE
RIGHT THERE.
Reporter: THERE'S BEEN NO
ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH THE
FIRES.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét