Welcome to American Dissident Voices.
I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.
I'M TRYING to wrap my mind around several concepts today, concepts that so many around
me see as self-evident, but which seem like bizarre, made-up nonsense to me.
Listen — and tell me if I'm crazy.
Here are some of the things that so many see as self-evidently true but which make me scratch
my head and wonder: Why the "Russia investigation" is even a real thing; why the Jews are an
especially vulnerable and helpless group, so much in need of our protection; why African
and Middle Eastern and other Third World migrants and supposed refugees "have nowhere else
to go" except the White world; and how the German National Socialists got a reputation
for being the "world's most evil" government.
First, the "collusion with Russia" accusations: Donald Trump — for whom I hold no brief,
to put it mildly — is accused of having arranged or condoned meetings of his staff
or people close to him with Russian diplomats or other government representatives during
his recent presidential campaign.
To me, that is like accusing him of wearing pants or eating cheese sandwiches.
There's nothing there.
I have this feeling that diplomats, like ambassadors and their subordinates, tend to have large
numbers of meetings with political and business leaders in the countries to which they're
assigned, especially when those individuals seem likely to become decision-makers.
Isn't that their job?
Isn't that what our ambassadors do?
Why, therefore, is it surprising or "criminal" that the Russian ambassador might talk to
Donald Trump or members of his team before or after the election?
Why wouldn't they be interested in finding our what Trump's team was like and what
changes they were likely to make in US policies?
Who knows how many candidates in US elections have gone to Israel and put on their skullcaps
to pay obeisance to Jewish power, and have spoken there with Jewish officials.
A huge percentage, I'd expect.
How many of our elected "representatives," Democrat and Republican, are out-and-out vetted
by Jewish donors and explicitly questioned on their proposed policies toward the state
of Israel? — and how many hundreds of millions in campaign funds are then handed out by those
donors and by AIPAC, the biggest lobby and payoff gang in Washington, to those who pass
the vetting?
Talk about foreign interference in US elections!
Hell, those guys own the US elections.
Yet nobody's going to jail over that, and no one is even being investigated.
Even suggesting that there should be such an investigation is enough to get you labeled
an "anti-Semite" by the controlled media.
And how many elections and outright revolutions have our diplomats and intelligence bad guys
and secret teams interfered in throughout the world?
Weren't Victoria Nuland, "our" Jewish Assistant Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs, and Geoffrey Pyatt, the US ambassador to Ukraine, caught right
out in the open giving out cookies and encouragement to coup plotters right in the middle of a
revolution in Ukraine that succeeded in installing a Jewish government there? — and weren't
they, thanks to some excellent hackers who made their phone conversations public, also
caught basically promising high positions in the new government — and tons of US taxpayer
money — to traitorous Ukrainian politicians for supporting the US-instigated coup?
I think so.
Talk about foreign influence in elections!
And wasn't the US the bully-boy for Israel in using bombing, shootings, and outright
murder — either directly using "our" armed forces or through "rebel" proxies
— in forcing or attempting to force regime change on the people of Afghanistan, Iraq,
Libya, and now Syria?
Talk about foreign influence in elections!
And hasn't the US government been doing this kind of thing for 100 years or more?
So why all the hullabaloo about a few routine conversations with Russian diplomats?
I'll tell you why: It's because we are now a nation of men, not of laws.
American revolutionary John Adams said we should be the opposite — a nation of laws,
not of men, he said; meaning that principle should rule, not the whims of leaders or politicians.
But the proliferation of laws beyond all reason or need by corrupt legislators has gotten
to the point where not only has no man on Earth ever read every law and regulation of
the United States, but no man could do so even if he devoted his entire life to the
effort.
So, since no one can now know if he (or anyone) has or has not broken one of the innumerable
statutes and rules that cram Walmart Supercenter-size law libraries to overflowing, law today — if
it is enforced at all — can only be enforced selectively.
Therefore, the real situation that obtains in the US is this: Most people in America
are unmolested if they pay and obey, do what they're told, and keep their heads down
and their mouths shut.
Those who keep on the right side of those in power can commit innumerable crimes and
law enforcement will look the other way and take no interest in their activities whatsoever
— unless they become too notorious and there's a public outcry.
But say the "wrong things" and make political enemies and suddenly whole rooms full of nice,
nasty, heartless Jewish lawyers and law clerks will be hiring detectives and paying snitches,
many of them perjurers, to document everything you allegedly do or say and everyone you know
and every dime you make, and poring over every statute and regulation ever written for as
long as necessary to find out some way to "get" you — and get you they probably
will, no matter who you are; even if you are the President of the United States.
That explains the current Russia mania.
If it weren't Russia, it would be something else.
Like I said, I am not a fan of The Donald, but I have to say that there's something
truly obscene about these politicians who take Adelson money and AIPAC money standing
up and sanctimoniously proclaiming that a conversation with a Russian diplomat is some
kind of criminal "meddling" in US politics.
And there's something appallingly stupid about people who can't see or grasp that
obscenity.
So, tell me: Is that the way it really is, or not?
— am I right? — or am I crazy?
That brings me to the second concept that, just on the face of it, makes no sense at
all: The idea that the Jews — the ones I just mentioned who own the Congress and Senate
of the United States — are somehow extremely weak and vulnerable and in need of special
sympathy and protection and even money from the hard-pressed working people of the United
States.
We pay them tens of billions every year in "aid," forgiven "loans," and outright
gifts to the Jewish state.
We just gave them $38 billion as a gift to fund their military killing machine, one of
the most effective in the world.
Every time a rabbi paints a swastika on his own synagogue and doesn't get caught, we
pay huge and ever-increasing security bills for Jewish organizations and pressure groups.
We fund international commissions whose sole purpose is to root out, criminalize, and imprison
those who criticize Jewish power.
The Jews are so weak and vulnerable that they control a large stock of nuclear weapons that
is simultaneously illegal and yet politically unmentionable and untouchable.
They're so weak and vulnerable they dominate our Ivy League universities; own and control
all the major media of news and entertainment; absolutely dominate Wall Street and banking,
including the master money spigot of them all, the Federal Reserve Bank.
They are, in fact, the wealthiest and most powerful ethnic group on planet Earth.
Yet we are commanded to regard them as the most long-suffering, persecuted, vulnerable,
and endangered human group, deserving of special protection and consideration at every turn
— in need of constant help and aid just to ensure their bare existence.
They're so weak and vulnerable that they need us to fight their wars for them, with
our own sons and now even daughters dying in the process.
The evidence I've seen tells me that what we're commanded to believe about them is
actually the reverse of the truth.
So, tell me: Is that the way it really is, or not?
— am I right? — or am I crazy?
Another idea that is hard to accept is that brown or Black people fleeing persecution,
or war, or the consequences of their own dysfunctional cultures, must always go to White countries.
Take a look at the map I'll include in the text version of this broadcast.
Just one African country alone — the "Democratic Republic of the Congo" — is just about
the same size as all of western Europe.
And that's just one country!
Look at the vastnesses of sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East.
Include in the Middle East all of the Arab countries of north Africa.
Look at the whole mass of Mestizo nations south of the Rio Grande — a whole continent
and a half!
Add these areas up.
These are huge areas.
They dwarf the United States.
They dwarf Australia.
They dwarf Europe.
Yet somehow we are to believe that these invaders of the White world "have nowhere else to
go."
And they are sweeping into our nations like locusts, by the millions, and going practically
nowhere else.
It sounds to me like these brown people, however real their problems may be, are being used
as weapons to bring chaos, miscegenation, violence, crime, and cultural destruction
to the White nations of the Earth.
So, tell me: Is that the way it really is, or not?
— am I right? — or am I crazy?
Another thing we are told is that makes little sense to me is that the one nation that really
put up a fight against the same destruction we are now facing, National Socialist Germany,
was "the most evil nation on Earth" led by "the most evil man who ever lived,"
and that these evil people, for no good reason whatsoever, decided to exterminate all the
Jews they could lay their hands on using a pesticide that was designed to kill lice.
This seems odd, because just a few years before this was supposed to have occurred, Germany
had developed the infamous nerve gas, Sarin, which is 26 times more effective than the
insecticide designed to kill lice, Zyklon B, which they are accused of using.
They had in fact manufactured a large quantity of Sarin and even experimented with placing
it in projectiles.
But the Germans made a conscious decision — perhaps influenced by Adolf Hitler's
own suffering from mustard gas in World War 1, and his belief that it would be inhumane
— not to use Sarin or any other nerve agent on any enemy target whatsoever, even though
they were locked in a struggle for their very existence, and even though their scientists
had developed several such agents.
Under those circumstances, how likely is it that they would use a bug bomb to murder millions
of people in a vast and resource- and transportation-intensive industrial killing program?
There are so many levels of unlikelihood here: Why such a program at all, when they had already
refused to use certain deadly weapons on their sworn and deadly enemies, weapons of which
only they had knowledge, on grounds of inhumanity? — and when they even allowed part-Jews to
serve in the German officer corps?
And, assuming they really did want to kill millions, why transport the alleged victims
to a hodge-podge of camps hundreds of miles away when a bullet on the spot would do?
Why use poison gas at all?
And, if you are going to use poison gas, why not use the most effective one, the one that
takes micrograms instead of milligrams to kill?
Why use a bug bomb?
The subject of the alleged "Holocaust" is a vast one, and has been the subject of
many thick volumes, but even the basic questions that would occur to any reasonable person
given the initial facts, lead to skepticism about the claims that in many countries it
is a criminal offense to question.
I am very, very skeptical of these claims.
It seems to me that they are most likely a ploy to gain a special degree of sympathy
— and tolerance of aggressive, predatory behavior — for that richest and most powerful
ethnic group I just mentioned.
So, tell me: Is that the way it really is, or not?
— am I right? — or am I crazy?
If you don't think I'm crazy — if you think I might be on to something here — something
vital, something important — drop me a line and let's work together.
* * *
You've been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National
Alliance.
The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to
the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival
and advancement.
To help us, send donations to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA or
visit natall.com/donate.
To order books and CDs from National Alliance books, visit natall.com/shop and for free
fliers to spread the truth in your community, visit natall.com/fliers.
Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA.
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley
Cotten:
Freedom is not free; free men are not equal;
and equal men are not free.
For more infomation >> Fanie Fayar médaillés d'or au Jeux de la Francophonie 2017 - Duration: 22:52. 
For more infomation >> 최신 새:[테마 HD] "레드 or 오렌지"…아이돌, 핫썸머 헤어 |아이돌 24/7 - Duration: 3:41. 
For more infomation >> How to buy or sell dollar/bitcoin with bkash in Bangladesh।। ipdbse wallet (Bangla Video) - Duration: 10:08. 
For more infomation >> How to Speed up or Slow Motion on Camtasia 9 - Duration: 5:18. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét