Chủ Nhật, 18 tháng 6, 2017

Youtube daily Time Jun 18 2017

I'm a bit excited, because today I'm gonna shoot

my very, very first Dana Alexa dance cover.

It was about time!

Finished!

This was finally my first dance cover of Dana's choreography.

I learned "Still Got Time" in her Masterclass in Prague.

I went there for the workshop.

Check out the video in the description.

I made a vlog about my trip to Prague and her class.

It was really exciting.

Back home, I learned the last part thanks to her tutorial.

And today I finally did my first dance cover.

One day you've gotta finish.

Even though I'm still not satisfied.

But that's how it is...

I wanna go on with another routine,

so that must be enough for now.

(Sven) I think you did awesome.

Thanks for watching.

I hope you liked it.

Stay tuned, there is more to come.

For more infomation >> STILL GOT TIME ❘ Dance Cover ♥ Dana Alexa Choreography - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

Day 7 엉덩이를 위한 엉덩이 자극을 위한 운동! Nacho Time & Glute Workout - Duration: 2:55.

For more infomation >> Day 7 엉덩이를 위한 엉덩이 자극을 위한 운동! Nacho Time & Glute Workout - Duration: 2:55.

-------------------------------------------

That time vol.2 - Dead Sea | הפעם ההיא - פרק 2 - ים המלח | 2017 - Duration: 2:04.

That time | vol.2 | Sunrise Hunt

3:30 AM

Destination: " The Sea in the Hebrew land..."

"...In which living creatures float without swimming..."

"...and dead beings are sinking down..." Pausanias, Greek Geograph, 2nd century AC

Waze: "You have reached your destination"

Mud and pit holes

For more infomation >> That time vol.2 - Dead Sea | הפעם ההיא - פרק 2 - ים המלח | 2017 - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

The Walking Dead || Built For This Time - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> The Walking Dead || Built For This Time - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Best Leonardo DiCaprio Movies Of All Time |Titanic | Inception | Django Unchained | Departed - Duration: 11:22.

number 10 gangs of New York he's a 2002 American epic period drama film directed

by Martin Scorsese set in the mid 19th century in the five-point district of

New York City the screenplay is by Jake Hawkes Steven Zaillian and Kenneth

Lonergan it was inspired by Herbert as burries 1927 non-fiction book the gangs

of New York it was made in Susa de Rome distributed by Miramax Films and

nominated for numerous awards including the Academy Award for Best Picture among

nine other Oscar nominations the film made 77 million eight hundred twelve

thousand dollars in Canada and the United States it also took 23 million

seven hundred sixty three thousand six hundred ninety nine dollars in Japan and

sixteen million three hundred fifty eight thousand five hundred eighty

dollars in the United Kingdom worldwide the film grossed a total of 193 million

seven hundred seventy two thousand five hundred four dollars number nine the

wolf of Wall Street is a 2013 American biographical black comedy for crime film

directed by Martin Scorsese the screenplay by Terence winter is adapted

from the memoir of the same name by Jordan Belfort in recounts bellefleur's

perspective on his career as a stockbroker in New York City and how his

firm Stratton Oakmont engaged in rampant corruption and fraud on Wall Street that

ultimately led to his downfall Leonardo DiCaprio who also co-produced the film

stars as Belle faux with Jonah Hill as his business partner and friend Donnie

Azoff Margot Robbie as his second wife Naomi

Locker glia and Kyle Chandler as Patrick Denham the FBI agent who tries to bring

him down Matthew McConaughey Rob Reiner Jon

Favreau Joanna Lumley and Jean Dujardin are also featured

number eight shudder Ryland is a 2010 American neo-noir psychological thriller

film directed by Martin Scorsese and written by Lita caligra Deus based on

Dennis Lehane 2003 novel of the same name Leonardo DiCaprio stars as US

Marshal Edward Teddy Daniels who is investigating a psychiatric facility on

Shutter Island after one of the patients code missing Mark Ruffalo plays his

partner officer Ben Kingsley as the facility's lead psychiatrist and

Michelle Williams is Daniel's wife the film received generally favorable

reviews from critics and grossed over 294 million dollars at the box office

number seven the aviator he's a 2004 American epic biographical

drama film directed by Martin Scorsese written by John Logan it stars Leonardo

DiCaprio at Howard Hughes cate blanchett as Katharine Hepburn and Kate Beckinsale

as a the garden or the supporting cast features ian holm john c reilly Alec

Baldwin Jude Law as Errol Flynn Gwen Stefani as

Jean Harlow Kelly garner as face Tom review Willem Dafoe Alan Alda and Edward

Herrmann based on the 1993 non-fiction book Howard Hughes The Secret Life by

Charles Higham the film depicts the life of Howard

Hughes an aviation pioneer and director of Hell's Angels the film portrays his

life from 1927 to 1947 during which time Hughes became a successful film producer

and an aviation magnate while simultaneously growing more unstable due

to severe obsessive-compulsive disorder OCD The Aviator was released in the

United States on December 25th 2004 the film grossed 214 million dollars at the

box office it was nominated for 11 Academy Awards including Best Picture

Best Director Best Original Screenplay Best Actor in a leading role for

DiCaprio and Best Actor in a supporting role for alga winning five for Best

Cinematography best film editing best costume design best art direction and

best actress in a supporting role for Cate Blanchett number six the revenant

he's a 2015 American semi-biographical for five Western film directed and

co-produced by Alejandro G Inarritu and co-written by Naruto and Mark L Smith

based in part on Michael Punk's 2002 novel of the same name

describing frontiersman Hugh glass 'as experiences in 1823 it stars Leonardo

DiCaprio Tom Hardy domhnall gleeson and will Poulter the film premiered at the

TCL Chinese Theatre on December 16th 2015 and had a limited release on

December 25th expanding On January 8 2016 it received positive reviews from

critics with the performances direction and cinematography receiving praise the

revenant won three Golden Globe Awards five BAFTA Awards and at the 88th

Academy Awards in Nara two DiCaprio and Emmanuel Lubezki won the awards for Best

Director Best Actor and Best Cinematography respectively DiCaprio

also won the Golden Globe Award for Best Actor Motion Picture Drama Screen Actors

Guild Award for outstanding performance by a male actor and a leading role

Critics Choice Movie Award for Best Actor involved Award for Best Actor in a

leading role number five catch me if you can he's a 2002 American

biographical crime film based on the life of Frank a bag now who

before his 19th birthday successfully performed Khan's worth millions of

dollars by posing as a Pan American World Airways pilot a Georgia doctor and

a Louisiana parish prosecutor his primary crime was cheque fraud he became

so experienced that the FBI eventually turned to him for help and catching

other cheque forgers the film was directed by Steven Spielberg and stars

Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks with Christopher Walken Martin Sheen and

Nathalie Baye in supporting roles number four Titanic is a 1997 American

epic romance disaster film directed written co-produced and co-chairman a

fictionalized account of the sinking of the RMS Titanic it stars Leonardo

DiCaprio and Kate Winslet as members of different social classes who fall in

love aboard the ship during its ill-fated maiden voyage Titanic achieved

critical and commercial success nominated for 14 Academy Awards it tied

all about Eve 1954 the most Husker nominations and won eleven including the

Awards for Best Picture and Best Director time Ben Hur 1959 for the most

Oscars won by a single film with an initial worldwide gross of over one

point eight four billion dollars Titanic was the first film to reach the billion

dollar mark it remained the highest grossing film of all time until

Cameron's 2009 film avatar surpassed it in 2010 a 3d version of Titanic released

on April 4 2012 to commemorate the centennial of the sinking earned it an

additional three hundred forty three point six million dollars worldwide

pushing the film's worldwide total to 2.18 billion dollars it became the

second film to gross more than two billion dollars a worldwide number three

django unchained is a 2012 American revisionist western film written and

directed by Quentin Tarantino starring Jamie Foxx Christoph Waltz Leonardo

DiCaprio Kerry Washington and samuel l jackson with Walton Goggins Dennis

Christopher James remar Michael parks and Don Johnson supporting roles set in

the Old West and antebellum South it is a highly stylized tribute to spaghetti

westerns in particular the 1966 Italian film Django by Sergio Corbis I who star

Franco Nero has a cameo appearance Django Unchained premiered at the

Ziegfeld Theatre in New York City on December 11 2012 and was released on

December 20 fifth 2012 in the United States the film

was nominated for several film industry awards including five Academy Awards

waltz won several awards for his performance among them Best Supporting

Actor at the Golden Globes BAFTAs and Academy Awards Tarantino won an Academy

Award a Golden Globe and a BAFTA Award for writing the film's original

screenplay the film grossed over 425 million dollars worldwide in theaters

against its 100 million dollar budget making it Darin Tino's highest-grossing

theatrical release number two inception he's a 2010 science fiction film written

co-produced and directed by Christopher Nolan and co-produced by Emma Thomas the

film stars Leonardo DiCaprio as a professional thief who steals

information by infiltrating the subconscious and is offered a chance to

have his criminal history erased as payment for a seemingly impossible task

inception the implantation of another person's idea into a target subconscious

the ensemble cast additionally includes Ken Watanabe Joseph gordon-levitt Marion

cottilard Ellen Page Tom Hardy the Lea prowl

Cillian Murphy Tom Berenger and Michael Caine it won four Academy Awards for

Best Cinematography best sound editing best sound mixing and best visual

effects and was nominated for four more Best Picture Best Original Screenplay

best art direction and Best Original Score number one the departed he's a

2006 American crime drama film directed by Martin Scorsese and written by

William Monahan it is remake of the 2002 Hong Kong film Infernal Affairs Dada

film stars Leonardo DiCaprio Matt Damon Jack Nicholson and Mark Wahlberg with

Martin Sheen Ray Winstone Vera Farmiga Anthony Anderson and Alec Baldwin in

supporting roles the film was a critical and commercial success and won several

awards including four Oscars at the 79th me Awards Best Picture Best Director

Best Adapted Screenplay and best film editing Wahlberg was also nominated for

Best Supporting Actor The Departed grossed 132 point four million dollars

in the United States and Canada and one hundred fifty seven point five million

dollars in other territories for a total gross of 289 point eight million dollars

against a production budget of ninety million dollars

For more infomation >> Top 10 Best Leonardo DiCaprio Movies Of All Time |Titanic | Inception | Django Unchained | Departed - Duration: 11:22.

-------------------------------------------

Story Time: Kumba did it! Mark Bennett. English lesson. ESL: EFL: ELL - Duration: 5:22.

For more infomation >> Story Time: Kumba did it! Mark Bennett. English lesson. ESL: EFL: ELL - Duration: 5:22.

-------------------------------------------

Trying Resistance Bands for the First Time | Flab to Fierce Episode 2 - Duration: 5:03.

you see these stairs I'm about to make these stairs my little you guys I'm

gonna be honest I've not worked out since you guys fell that last video I'll

link it in the description box below ah I think it's me of I'm still losing

weight so I don't feel the need but I know working out will make me feel a lot

better and that's what this honestly is about more than the weight loss so I

wanted to incorporate it and I figured since I just got resistance bands that I

would show you guys some booty workouts that I saw from Whitney Simmons on her

Instagram if you guys don't know who she is like where have you been and I'll

link her YouTube in the description box because she's amazing I love her anyway

let's go ahead and try to get this workout life before I change my mind

you guys these resistance bands are lovin probably and I'm now adding new

stairs I'm nervous okay don't laugh at my check okay it's my first time doing a

one-count heart with heart I'm happy lit but I think I hear falling down okay I

can't talk

all right now go up the stairs you supposed to go right out there in real

life I don't know what I'm doing but I feel something working in this

matters that was intense actually no it was just about a shape

that's that's that's telling me oh I know a little bit about you being your

sister and also isn't it true that you you know you incorporate walking and you

know stairs at work you you yet aren't new to this this life

straightaway five men like I had your son doing that I used to walk like on my

15-minute breaks I get two of them and I used to walk like 4:30 of my our lunch

mm-hmm but now I didn't feel like i use my lunch time to edit and it's been

really busy this season so I really don't take with long breaks I just kind

of stop working and just relax so you getting back in a stair game yes what

would you suggest to someone because I know you try to fit in walking a lot is

that a good starting point or do you think they should start in the gym or

what has worked best for you I start at your own comfort level if you don't feel

comfortable in the gym you probably won't feel comfortable just because you

want to go now so I think what I did I was just walking a

Moron I made it my mission to like each week either get a thousand more steps a

day than usual or just try to stand more often and dance more the dance all the

time a new album came out I would dance from start to finish it the album just

things like that so long that that you're working out but you actually are

getting a little bit more activity than you normally would

okay so just making it a little more fun mm-hmm yeah and then do you think that

you have to get your diet right first before working out or do you think

working out is the way to go first and then the diet well for me personally I

always think hours ago food so I wanted to get a tackle on my food and I knew

that working out was like very intimidating for me so okay if I like

found food that I knew I loved that would make me lose weight then it would

force me or and heard me to want to start working out which that's what it

did I mean it took like four or five months of like you know doing my time

yeah it took it's it all it took about four or five months for me to really

like feel like I had a handle on my diet and during that time I really didn't

think about working out because I wanted to focus on just one thing

For more infomation >> Trying Resistance Bands for the First Time | Flab to Fierce Episode 2 - Duration: 5:03.

-------------------------------------------

New Zealand_WANAKA Skydive My First Time - Duration: 7:18.

For more infomation >> New Zealand_WANAKA Skydive My First Time - Duration: 7:18.

-------------------------------------------

Faith Time: Christians Apart - Duration: 3:38.

Thanks melissa it's faith time

our weekly

conversation on matters of

faith, normally these

segments are live but this

morning we're on tape.

Chad: Joining us this morning

is Pastor Alan

Floyd, he is the senior pastor

at cottage hill

Baptist church. Thank-you for

joining us.

Alan: Glad to be here

Chad: The topic you wanted to

talk about

this morning is a very hard one

to grapple

with, it's the idea of

Christians as separate

from the world, how do you see

that issue

first of all?

Alan: I think it is a very

difficult struggle

that we are called by God,

commanded by

God, to be Holy, to be separate,

to live

different lives than of the

world. Yet at the

same time we're called to be a

light to

the world and to influence the

world, so

I think that we do that

primarily through good

deeds, acts of kindness

communicating the love of Christ

to the

world around us

Chad: and the concept really of

being

separate from the world, it's

got to be a

hard one for people of faith to

grapple with

because on the one hand you want

to

help, you want to have friends

you want to be

friendly but on the other hand

you also

want to make sure you're not

tempted by

the world. How do you run that

fine line

between not only helping the

world but

not being tempted by some of the

things

that are out there?

Alan: Well I think that we

certainly cannot

help but be tempted by the

things of the

world. We're always going to

face

temptations. We work out in the

world, we

may attend classes or school in

the world. I

think we can't help but to be

tempted but it is

our faith that keeps us from

surrendering to

that temptation yet continuing

to live

those Holy separate lives unto

Christ yet influencing them by

acts of kindness love generosity

mercy grace. Those things those

same characteristics that we

were given we are to share with

the world.

Chad: When you talk about being

separate

one of the things I worry about

or think

about is you want to lead this

holy life

there's also this other pull on

you that says I

don't want people to think I'm a

snob, I

don't want them to think I'm a

jerk, how

do you do that, maintain a holy

life but

still be loving?

Alan: I do think that the word

of God tells

us that we are in fact a

peculiar people. We

know that regardless because we

become

followers of Christ set apart

different, that we

are peculiar to those that are

in the world.

Why don't we tell the same

jokes? Why

don't we go to the same places

why don't

we do the same things? We are

in fact a peculiar people that

we can't avoid

however I think that by simply

being sincere,

being authentic then I think

communicates

something beyond superficiality

that what

we have our faith is genuine.

Chad: What do you think is the

biggest

challenge for Christians that

are

trying to live that sort of

life?

Alan: I think the biggest

temptation is

from the world, from the

activities, the

entertainment the movies we do

want to

fit in. We don't want to be

ostracized from

those around us so I think the

struggle is in

fact we don't want to be alone.

We want to get along with

friends; we want a community of

faith community of believers.

Chad: Pastor Alan Floyd with

Cottage Hill

Baptist Church thank-you for

joining

us for this edition of Faith

Time and News

Five this morning will continue

after the

break.

For more infomation >> Faith Time: Christians Apart - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

VLOG TIME: SKATEBOARD \(〇_o)/ - Duration: 3:06.

Today we've bought one interesting thing

It revealed that it was on sale

You won't guess what it is

It is a skateboard

This is my baby's birth

What did you want for 400 rubles (*very cheap)

Look, look, look at her

You look like a crab :D

Hi everyone~

Now it's my vlog

Don't fall, please

I'm good at it

Yeah, perfect

Show them

This is my maximum

Lets push her~

For more infomation >> VLOG TIME: SKATEBOARD \(〇_o)/ - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

HOORAY! Chinese Christians Finally Got Bible for FIRST TIME Powerful Soulful Reactions! - Duration: 1:53.

Hi Everyone! I want show you something amazing video!

We will watch that footage of Chinese Christian scene

Yes that true

Wow this so beautiful and..so painfully confrontational

My pastor told me (the congregation) about this video, Sunday

Because there christians around the world are being beaten, jailed, and executed for worshiping God Almighty

They are encouraging to practice Christianity in secret, out of fear of imprisonment and also death punishment by the government hostile...

This is what shows how spoiled we in the west are seeing this! God's Word is taken for granted here and it will take severe tribulation and persecution to wake so many of us up, but it's promised to the Lord Jesus Christ's children and it ain't far off the way things are going

These are Chinese Christians receiving their first bibles, which are banned in communist china

Get as many Bibles as possible now brothers and sisters, the bible will be banned sooner rather than later!

I believe that Comumunist China don't like most Christian and God

it's going to be important as coming persecution comes that believers love study the word and draw closer to God, so you know

I really don't know what this could happen to Christian Chinese people need the most important bible it just a salvation words of the god that you can see Christian Chinese hungry for the words

I hope you have a blessed and wonderful day :)

For more infomation >> HOORAY! Chinese Christians Finally Got Bible for FIRST TIME Powerful Soulful Reactions! - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

For the very first time, a Cuban Muslim journalist goes on tv with hijab - Duration: 1:42.

Hello Diana, greetings from Holguin

For more infomation >> For the very first time, a Cuban Muslim journalist goes on tv with hijab - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

World Enough And Time - Next Time Trailer - Doctor Who: Series 10 - BBC - Duration: 0:47.

For more infomation >> World Enough And Time - Next Time Trailer - Doctor Who: Series 10 - BBC - Duration: 0:47.

-------------------------------------------

"Hello, I'm Doctor Who!" - World Enough And Time Preview - Doctor Who: Series 10 - BBC - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> "Hello, I'm Doctor Who!" - World Enough And Time Preview - Doctor Who: Series 10 - BBC - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Senate tight on time to pass health care bill - Duration: 5:36.

For more infomation >> Senate tight on time to pass health care bill - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

J. Krishnamurti - Saanen 1961 - Public Talk 6 - Time does not wipe away sorrow - Duration: 1:05:52.

This is J. Krishnamurti's sixth public talk in Saanen, 1961.

We have been talking a great deal about facing the fact, observing without condemnation or

justification, to approach a fact without an opinion.

Especially where psychological facts are concerned we are apt to bring our prejudices, our desires,

our urges, which distort what is and thereby develop a certain guilt, a sense of contradiction,

a denial.

And we have been talking [about] that, about the importance of complete destruction of

all the things that we have built up as a refuge, as a defence.

Because life is much too vast and too fast, and our sluggish minds, our slow way of thinking,

our accustomed habits invariably create a contradiction within, and we dictate terms

to life; and so gradually this contradiction and conflict increases, and our minds become

more and more dull.

And I would like this morning, if I may, to talk about

the simple austerity of the mind, and suffering.

It is very difficult to be simple, to think directly, to see things clearly, to pursue

what we see to the very end, logically, reasonably, sanely.

It is very difficult to be clear and therefore

simple.

I mean by simplicity not merely what one puts on or what one takes off; I do not mean the

simplicity of outward garment, having few possessions, which are probably necessary,

but I mean much more psychologically, inwardly, because I think simplicity of approach to

a very complex problem, as suffering, is essential.

But before we can approach sorrow, I think we have to be very clear what we mean by that

word simple.

I feel that a mind which is already so complex, a mind that is so infinitely cunning, subtle,

which has so many experiences, a consciousness which has within it the residue of all time

and of the race, to reduce all this vast complexity to simplicity is very, very difficult.

And I think it has to be done, otherwise we shall not go beyond conflict and sorrow.

So, the question is—given all this complexity with knowledge, with considerable experience,

with various types of memories and experiences—how to look at sorrow and to be free of sorrow,

if that is at all possible.

First of all, I think, definition and explanation are really detrimental to find out for oneself

how to think simply and directly.

Definition in words does not make the mind simple.

Explanations do not bring about the clarity of perception.

So it seems to me one must be greatly aware of the slavery to words; and one also has

to be aware, hasn't one, that it is necessary to have words to communicate.

But what is communicated is not the word.

The communication is beyond the word—it's the feeling which cannot be put into words.

A really simple mind, which does not mean an ignorant mind, a mind that is free to follow,

to follow the subtle facts, all the nuances, the movements of a given fact: and to do that

the mind must, surely, be free from the slavery of words.

And I think such freedom brings about an austerity of simplicity.

When there is that simplicity, then I think we can look and try to understand what is

sorrow.

I think simplicity of approach, simplicity of mind, and sorrow, are related.

Because to live in sorrow throughout our time for years, is surely, to put it very mildly,

the most foolish thing to do.

To live in conflict, to live in sorrow, to live in frustration, always entangled in fear,

in ambition, and the urge to fulfil and to be a success, with all its conflicts, fears,

sorrows—to live a whole life in that state seems to me so utterly foolish, unnecessary.

And to be free of sorrow, one must approach this complex problem very simply.

Now, there are various kinds of sorrows: physical pain, and psychological frustrations, the

physical disease, toothache, losing a limb, having poor eyesight, and so on; and the sorrow

that comes into being when one loses somebody whom you love; when you have no capacity and

you see people who have capacity; when you have no talent and you see people with talent,

who have success, money, position, prestige, power.

There is the urge to fulfil, and in the shadow of fulfilment, there is always frustration,

and with it comes sorrow.

So, there are these two types of sorrow: the physical and the psychological.

One may lose one's arm, and then the whole problem comes, the sorrow comes, when the

mind goes back into the past, that it is no longer able to play tennis, no longer able

to do certain things.

It goes back into the past, remembers what it has done, and

compares; and in that process sorrow is engendered.

We are familiar with that.

The fact is, I have lost my arm.

That's a fact.

No amount of theorizing, no amount of explanation, no amount of self pity will bring that arm

back.

But the mind indulges in self pity, going back to the past: how I enjoyed playing tennis,

doing certain things, and now it is not capable.

So, the fact of the present in contradiction with what has been—this comparison invariably

brings conflict, and out of that conflict is sorrow.

That's one kind of sorrow.

Then there is the psychological thing.

My brother, my son is dead, he's gone; no amount of theorizing, explaining, believing,

hoping will ever bring him back.

He's gone—that's a fact, a ruthless, uncompromising reality: he's gone.

And the other fact is, I am very lonely because he's gone: lonely, no companion.

We played together, we watched together, we laughed together, we said things, we knew

each other; and the companionship is gone and I'm left.

And I know what that loneliness is.

Loneliness is a fact, and the death is a fact.

I may accept the fact of his death: I have to.

But I do not accept the fact of being alone, of being lonely in this world.

Then, as I do not accept the fact of being alone, lonely; as I do not accept it, then

I begin to invent theories, hopes, explanations, escapes from the fact.

So these escapes, explanations, beliefs, hopes, bring about sorrow—not the fact that I'm

lonely, not the fact that my brother is dead.

The fact can never bring sorrow, and I think that is important to understand if the mind

is to be really, totally, completely free from sorrow.

And I think it is possible to be totally free from sorrow when the mind no longer seeks

explanations, no longer escapes, but faces the fact.

I do not know if you have ever tried this.

We know what death is—I am not talking about death in the large sense; we will, another

day—we know what death is, and the extraordinary fear that it invokes.

And it is a fact that we will die, each one of us, whether we like it or not.

Either we rationalize death, or escape in beliefs and therefore sustain fear; and if

a mind really is concerned to go to the very end to discover if it is possible to be totally,

completely free of sorrow, not in time, in the present, now.

Because we have theories: of karma, reincarnation, resurrection, and innumerable ways, ideas,

beliefs which help us to escape from the fact.

Now, can each one of us intelligently, sanely face the fact that my son, brother, sister,

wife, husband, whatever it is, is dead, and I am lonely—and not escape from that loneliness,

not seek explanations, not have cunning beliefs in which we take shelter.

To really accept the fact of everything—that I

have no talent, that I am a dull, stupid person, that I'm lonely, that my beliefs, my religious

structures, spiritual values are so many defences—can I look at these facts and not seek out ways

and means to escape?

Is it possible?

I think it is possible only when we are not concerned with time, with tomorrow.

We are lazy, our minds are lazy, and so we say, "We'll get over it, give me time."

Time doesn't wipe away sorrow.

We forget, but sorrow is there all the time, deep down.

And to wipe away sorrow in its entirety, completely, so that the mind is no longer in the shadow

of sorrow—I think it is possible, so that there is no suffering, not tomorrow, not in

the course of time, but to see the reality in the present and to go beyond it.

After all, why should we suffer?

Suffering is a disease.

And as you go to a doctor or to someone to rid you of that disease, why should we bear

sorrow of any kind?

Please, I'm not talking rhetorically, which would be too stupid.

Why should we, each one of us, have any sorrow?

And is it possible to be rid of it completely?

You see, that question implies, why should we be in conflict?

Sorrow is conflict.

Why should there be conflict at all?

We say conflict is necessary, it is part of existence; everything around us is in conflict:

nature, all human beings are in conflict.

And to be, to have no conflict is not possible.

We accept conflict as inevitable, within and without, inside the skin and in the world.

To me, conflict is not necessary, of any kind.

You may say, "That is a peculiar idea of your own, it has no value.

It is very nice for you who are alone, unmarried, and all the rest of the bilge.

We have to live in the world; we must be in conflict with our neighbours; we are in conflict

with our jobs; everything that we touch and do breeds conflict."

I think it has to do with right education—not to think in competition, not to compare.

I wonder if one understands through comparison, if one really sees directly by comparing?

Or, you see directly, simply, only when comparison has ceased, which means, when the mind is

no longer trying to be ambitious, to be, become something—which does not mean that we must

be satisfied with what we are.

I think to live without comparison, comparing yourself with another, comparing what you

are with what should be, but being, facing what is all the time, wipes away totally all

comparative values—actually seeing what is— thereby, I think, we can eliminate sorrow.

And I think it is very important for a mind to be free from sorrow, because then life

has a totally different meaning.

You see, another unfortunate thing that we do is to seek comfort—not physical comfort

but psychological comfort.

We went to take shelter in an idea.

When that idea fails, we are in despair, which again breeds sorrow.

So, can the mind not live, function, be, without any shelter, without any refuge, and live

from day to day, facing every fact as it arises and never seeking an escape, facing what is

all the time, every minute of the day?

Then I think we'll find that not only there is the ending of sorrow, but also the mind

becomes astonishingly simple and clear.

It is able to perceive directly, without words,

without the symbol.

I do not know if you have ever thought without words.

Is there any thinking with¬out verbalizing?

Or is all thinking merely words—not only words, but symbols, pictures, imagination?

You see, all these, like words, symbols, ideas, are detrimental to clear sight, to see things.

And a mind that would go to the very end of sorrow to find out if it is possible to be

totally free—not eventually—but living every day to be free from sorrow, one has

to go very deeply into oneself to rid of all these explanations, words, ideas, beliefs,

so that the mind is cleansed and is capable of seeing what is.

Shall we...

Perhaps we can ask questions and discuss this, what we have been talking about this morning.

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: The gentleman asks, when there is sorrow one wants to do something about

it, and still one is afraid to do what one wants to do.

Sir, as we were saying the other day, we want to live with pleasure, don't we?

We don't want to change it, do we?

We want it to continue all day and all night and everlastingly.

We don't want to alter it, we don't want even to touch it, to breathe upon it, because

we want to hold it, don't we?

The thing that delights us, that gives us joy, pleasure, sensation, like going to church,

sitting everlastingly, day after day at mass—it gives a great deal of excitement, sensation.

You don't want to alter that feeling.

You feel that you are very near to the source of things.

We want to do that, don't we?

Why can't we live equally, with the same intensity, with the same urgency, with sorrow,

not wanting to do a thing about it?

Have you ever tried it?

Have you ever tried to live with a physical pain?

Have you ever tried to live with noise?

Let's begin much more simply.

When the dog is barking of a night when you want to go to sleep in the country, and it

keeps on barking, barking, what do you do?

You resist it, you throw, you curse it, you do all kinds of things.

But if you went with the noise, listened to the barking without any resistance.

I don't know if you have ever tried this.

You should try it sometime: never to resist.

And you don't resist where pleasure is concerned.

On the contrary, you want more of it.

In the same way, to live without resistance, without choice, with sorrow, never seeking

escape, never [having an] explanation, never any hope and thereby despair—to live with

it.

You know what it means to live with something?

It's to love it.

When you love someone, you want to live with that person, don't you?

In the same way, to live with sorrow—I don't mean sadistically—but to

live with sorrow, never trying to avoid it, see the whole picture of it, the source of

it, the intensity of it, the utter superficiality of it also, which means that you can't do

anything about it as you don't want to do anything about that which gives you intense

pleasure.

You don't want to alter the shape of pleasure; you don't want to put it in a frame, you

want to let it flow: in the same way to live with sorrow, which means, really, to love

sorrow.

And that requires a great deal of energy, a great deal of understanding, watching all

the time to see whether the mind is escaping from the fact.

And it's terribly easy to escape: a drug, a drink, turning on the radio, books, chatter,

knowledge.

And to live with something entirely, totally—whether it's pleasure or pain—requires a mind

that is intensely alert.

And, when the mind is so alert, it creates its own action, or rather, the action comes

from the fact, and the mind hasn't to do anything about the fact.

Questioner: In case of physical pain, do you mean to say that we do not go to see the doctor?

KRISHNAMURTI: The gentleman asks, if I have physical pain, as toothache, shouldn't I

go to the dentist?

I think that would be rather silly, wouldn't it, if you couldn't go to the dentist.

If you had some kind of physical ailment, shouldn't you go to the doctor?

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: That's right, sir.

The gentleman.

says, when you have a toothache, you don't argue about it.

Sir, aren't we being rather superficial when we ask such a question?

I am, we are, talking of both the physical pain and suffering as well as [the] psychological,

inward, emotional—you know, all that suffering, mental suffering, the tortures that one goes

through for some idea, for some belief, for some person, wanting to hold that person.

We all know these things.

We are talking about, we are asking ourselves, whether it is possible to be totally free

from inward sorrow.

Sir, our organism, physical organism is a machine and it does go out of order—you

have to do something about it.

You do the best thing you can and get on with it.

But to see that the mechanical organism doesn't interfere with the mind, pervert the mind,

twist the mind, and the mind remains healthy in spite of physical diseases.

And whether the mind, which is the source of all enlightenment, and of all conflict,

misery and sorrow, whether the mind can be free from sorrow, uncontaminated by physical

diseases and all the rest of it—whether it is possible.

After all, we're all growing old, every day.

And whether it is possible to keep the mind young, fresh, innocent, not weighed down by

tremendous experiences and knowledge and misery.

I feel a young mind, an innocent mind is absolutely necessary to discover what is true, if there

is something as God, as truth, or what name you may like to give to it.

An old mind, a mind that is tortured, full of suffering, can never find the other.

And to make sorrow into something extraordinary, something that will eventually lead you to

heaven, I think that's absurd.

And in Christianity, suffering is extolled as the way to enlightenment.

One must be free from suffering, from the darkness, and then only the light can be.

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: "Is it possible to be free from sorrow when I see so much sorrow around

me?"

What do you think?

You go to the East, to India, Asia, and you will see a great deal of sorrow, physical

sorrow, starvation, lack of food, degradation, poverty.

That's one type of sorrow.

You come to the modern world, where everybody is so actively busy decorating the outward

prison, and they also are very poor, inwardly empty, but outwardly enormously rich, prosperous.

There is also sorrow.

What can you, as an individual, do about it?

What can you do about my sorrow?

Can you help me?

Do think it out, sirs.

Can you help me?

Now, wait a minute, wait a minute.

I talked this morning for about half an hour about sorrow and how to be free of sorrow.

Do I help you?

Actually help you in the sense, rid of it, not carry it with you for another day, to

be totally free of sorrow.

Can I help you?

Do I help you?

I don't think so.

Questioner: In a sense, surely.

KRISHNAMURTI: The lady says, in a sense, yes.

But please, just a minute.

When I said I don't think so, I mean by that, you have to do all the work, I'm only

pointing out.

Therefore, the sign is of no value, in the sense you don't sit there and go on reading

the sign everlastingly.

To face loneliness and go to the very end of it—what is implied in it.

Can I help the sorrow of the world?

We know the anguish that one goes through, the despairs, not only one's own but [that

which] you see in the faces of others.

You can point out, you can tell them that's the door through which to go to be free, but

most people want to be carried through the door.

They worship the carrier, or make one a saviour, a master, which is all sheer nonsense.

Questioner: You spoke of the barking of a dog in the night.

Do you think that provokes physical pain or psychological sorrow?

KRISHNAMURTI: Both.

The barking of a dog at night, surely, is both physical pain (laughing), isn't it?

Sir, one must take certain things very seriously, and other things you must play with it.

To take things seriously, as I pointed out, is to go to the very end of it, the capacity

to pursue sorrow to the very end and see if the mind can be utterly free from the darkness

of it.

And that requires a great deal of alertness, watchfulness—that one has to take seriously,

but to take... one has to take seriously also physical pain, but that's at a different

level.

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: I beg your pardon?

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: Ah.

"What use is a free person to another, what use is a free person to another, if he can't

help him?"

How terribly utilitarian we are, aren't we?

We want to use everything to our benefit or to somebody else's benefit.

What use is a flower on the roadside?

What use is a cloud beyond the mountain?

What's the use of love?

Can you use love?

Has charity any use?

Has humility any use?

To be without ambition in a world that's full of ambition—has that any use?

To be kind, to be gentle, to be generous—these have no uses to a man who is not generous.

A free person is utterly useless to a man who is ridden with ambition.

And as most of us are caught in ambition, in success, he is of very little significance.

He may talk about freedom, but what we are concerned [with] is success.

All that he can tell you is to come over to the other bank of the river and see the beauty

of the sky, the loveliness of being simple, to love, to be kind, to be generous, to be

without ambition.

And very few people want to come to the other shore.

And, therefore, the man who is on the other shore is of very little use.

Probably you'll put him in a church and worship him—that's about all.

Questioner: To live with sorrow seems to imply the prolongation of sorrow which...

(inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: 'To live with sorrow implies prolongation of sorrow, and we shrink from

the prolongation of sorrow."

I didn't mean that, surely.

To live with something—whether ugliness or beauty—one has to be very intense, hasn't

one, otherwise it corrupts you.

To live with these mountains day after day, day after day, if you're not alive to them,

if you don't see them, if you don't love them, if you don't see the beauty of them

all the time, their changing colours, shadows, you become like these peasants who have seen

it and have become dull.

That beauty also corrupts, as something ugly corrodes the mind.

When I said to live with sorrow, it's to live with the mountains, because sorrow makes

the mind dull, stupid.

But to live with sorrow implies watching endlessly; and that doesn't prolong sorrow, the moment

you understand the whole thing.

You see, I feel when we see something totally, it's finished.

When we see the totality of sorrow, the whole construction, the anatomy, the inwardness

of it, see it—I don't mean theorize about it—actually see the fact of it, the totality

of it, then it drops away.

And the rapidity, the swiftness of perception depends on the mind.

And if the mind is cluttered up, not simple, direct—cluttered up with beliefs, hopes,

fears, despairs, wanting to change the fact, the what is—then you prolong sorrow.

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: Yes.

Yes, sir.

Now, will you take time to experiment with it?

Questioner: (inaudible)

KRISHNAMURTI: Sir, I...

Sir, just a minute.

The gentleman says, it will take time to see the totality of something, the totality of

sorrow.

Questioner: That is not my meaning.

To get rid of preconceptions may take time, but seeing the totality of something is continuous.

KRISHNAMURTI: Yes, sir.

Questioner: But our preconceptions are in the way.

We have to tackle them.

That may take time.

KRISHNAMURTI: Sir, I understand.

To see that one is lonely, and also to be aware that one wants to escape from it, are

both instantaneous.

They are instantaneous, aren't they?

I am lonely for various...

I am lonely, and I don't like that state, and I want to escape from it.

Now, the fact that I'm lonely, and the fact that I want to escape, I can perceive immediately,

can't I?

Instantly I can see that.

And I can also see instantly that any form of escape is an avoidance of the fact of loneliness,

which I must understand.

I can't push it aside.

Now, when I'm not escaping in any form, then I can face the fact, can't I, instantly.

You see, our difficulty, I think, is we are so attached to the things which we have escaped

to, they have become so important to us, they have become so extraordinarily respectable;

and if we cease to be respectable—God knows what would happen!

Therefore, our attachment to respectability, to the things that we have escaped to, becomes

all-important and not the fact that I want to understand totally what is loneliness,

or any other thing.

Questioner: If we don't have that intensity in us, what can we do about it?

KRISHNAMURTI: The lady asks, If we do not have the intensity, what can we do about it?

I wonder if we want that intensity?

Because to be intense implies destruction, doesn't it?

Shattering everything that we have considered so important in life.

And, we are afraid; and perhaps fear prevents us from being intense.

You know, we all want to be terribly respectable, don't we, the young as well as the old.

Respectability means recognition by society; and society only recognizes that which is

successful: the important, the famous.

The rest society isn't concerned with.

So we worship success and respectability.

And when you don't seek success, when you no longer care whether you're respectable

or not, whether you succeed, whether you are somebody or not, then there is intensity,

which means, there is no fear, which means, there is no conflict, no contradiction within

and, therefore, you have all the abundant energy that is necessary to pursue the fact

to the very end.

I think we had better stop, it's twelve.

For more infomation >> J. Krishnamurti - Saanen 1961 - Public Talk 6 - Time does not wipe away sorrow - Duration: 1:05:52.

-------------------------------------------

Bible Time with Jason Wallace - Duration: 52:08.

For more infomation >> Bible Time with Jason Wallace - Duration: 52:08.

-------------------------------------------

Sunday Morning Service- White Oak Baptist Church 6/18/17 Love is Spelled T-I-M-E - Duration: 1:07:45.

For more infomation >> Sunday Morning Service- White Oak Baptist Church 6/18/17 Love is Spelled T-I-M-E - Duration: 1:07:45.

-------------------------------------------

Déjà-vu - A brief meeting in a different time - Duration: 1:44.

The video on the left was taken in the same place with a similar angle to the video I made (on the right) a few days earlier.

They turned out a bit similar.

Déjà-vu - A brief meeting in a different time

For more infomation >> Déjà-vu - A brief meeting in a different time - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

J. Krishnamurti - Saanen 1984 - Public Talk 1 - If all time is now, what is action? - Duration: 1:16:23.

What a lovely morning this is, isn't it?

A great silence,

specially very early in the morning,

just as the sun is rising.

All the snow-capped mountains,

the deep valleys, the vague shadows

and the sense of great immensity:

that is beauty.

Beauty is very important in our lives,

not merely the romantic side of it,

the imaginative side,

but the sense of utter silence,

specially when you wake up in the morning,

looking out of the window

when there is no car passing by,

no chattering of people,

and this great immensity

can only be seen or appreciated

when the self is not.

What corrupts our daily life, as well as nature,

and the beauty of the earth,

is our narrow little minds,

our selfishness, our brutality,

violence and all the corruption,

and the wars that human beings are preparing.

All that denies the immensity of life,

the goodness of life,

the goodness of freedom

and the beauty which is not romantic,

that beauty that demands great austerity,

a sense of a brain that is at rest,

not chattering.

This beauty is truth,

this beauty is goodness.

And we search for it all over the earth in different ways,

following various leaders, scriptures

and obeying and disobeying,

pursuing various pleasures

- all that denies surely

the great beauty and the immensity of life.

Why is it

that we have reduced this immensity of life,

which is immense,

why is it that we have made it all so petty,

personal, destructive, utterly meaningless?

I wonder if one asks this question of ourselves,

and one hopes that you will be doing this

during all these talks,

that we are together

going to question everything in our life,

doubt everything in our life.

Doubt is an extraordinarily important thing;

scepticism.

To observe every experience that one has,

doubt that very experience,

doubt that very thought,

doubt that very feeling,

so the brain becomes extraordinarily

cleansed of all our accumulated experiences,

tradition and so on.

This is what we are going to do during all these talks.

This is no personal, or personality cult.

Please understand this.

We all want to cling or worship,

or feel near someone, person.

We are accustomed to that.

And we are saying this is not a personality cult at all.

So please don't build an image about him, the speaker.

The speaker is not very valuable.

What is valuable, what has significance,

is what he is saying.

And to understand what he is saying you must question,

not accept a thing.

Which means you have to observe,

one has to observe one's own reactions,

one's own attitudes, justifications, defences and so on.

Then it is possible for both of us to communicate with each other,

not theoretically,

not in abstraction but actually,

because we are going to take a very long journey together,

no detours at all.

We are going together to watch this whole phenomenon of life,

of which you are.

And also please bear in mind that this is not an entertainment.

Because we are used to being entertained,

it is our habit;

cinema, television, books, novels,

we want to be entertained.

And religions have become that too, a form of entertainment.

So please bear in mind throughout these talks

that this is not in any way entertainment.

The speaker is not trying to help you.

Please bear that in mind very seriously.

Because if he is out to help you then he becomes the leader,

a man who then conducts you, tells you what to do and so on.

So this is not entertainment,

nor an intellectual feast.

Because we must use our intellect,

it is part of our daily life,

it is part of our biological construction.

But those of us rather neglect the intellectual capacity

and treat the whole thing as a kind of romantic, theoretical activity.

So the speaker is not helping you

but we are together, if you will,

think, observe, feel

the whole extraordinary complex phenomenon of daily living.

Please be serious about this,

that the speaker is in no way your guide,

or the abomination of a guru.

That means then you become merely a follower.

And generally the followers destroy

that which is truth.

So we are going together to think,

and that is one of the most difficult things to do

because each one of us has opinions,

very strong opinions, very strong conclusions,

biased, prejudices,

conditioned according to our particular pleasure or experience.

So one becomes isolated

and thinking together becomes almost impossible.

I do not know if you have not noticed this,

even between the wife and husband,

girl- and a boyfriend and so on,

they can never think together,

observe together the same thing, the same reaction,

the same intensity, at the same time,

but there is always this division: 'I think, you think',

'It is my opinion, my judgement' and so on.

So please first see how difficult it is and arduous,

it requires great attention to think together.

Because thinking is very important in our life.

All our action is based on thinking.

And now as each one of us feels separate, individualistic,

with his own gods, with his own experiences,

with his own prejudices and so on,

and thinking together, if we could do that,

it would be a marvellous thing.

If one could put aside,

at least for this hour, put aside our prejudices,

our opinions,

our tendencies,

idiosyncrasies

and observe,

not according to your observation or my observation

but to observe the mountains together,

the beauty, the majesty of those hills,

the splendour of sunshine,

the running waters,

the extraordinary glory of the earth,

together.

And our difficulty is also that we have

- we are caught in words.

You have a certain meaning to words,

or the speaker has a certain meaning to words.

And we use the words to communicate,

which we must.

But also if one can realize

our brain is caught, trapped,

captured in words.

I wonder if one realises that,

how words have become extraordinarily important.

And so it becomes very superficial

when we are constantly using words,

which have become a slogan,

repetitive, mechanical

- I am British, I am French, I am German and so on.

But to go much deeper, beyond and above the words,

requires an extraordinary alertness, not to be trapped by words.

And then only it is possible to think together.

Can we do this this morning?

Actually be aware of one's own prejudices, opinions, dogmas,

our own particular attitudes

and put all those aside for a while at least,

if you can do that.

Then we can think together.

Then we can work together.

And also it is important to realise

that this is not an activity of stimulation.

The speaker is not trying to stimulate you.

He is not acting as a drug

so that you are stimulated for this morning

and let it peter out during the day.

So it is not a stimulation.

It is not a propaganda,

to make you think in a certain way.

He is not propagating any ideal,

any theory, any belief,

because theories, ideals, beliefs, dogmas,

have separated human beings.

There are the totalitarian ideals,

and the ideals of the so-called world of freedom.

They are at war with each other.

And we are also at war with each other,

this perpetual conflict in our life.

If you cannot get on with one person,

either you break away from that person,

divorce,

all those extraordinary divisive processes

that are going on in our daily life.

Please listen to the words and see

if they are true, if they are actual,

if they have any meaning in our daily life,

or these talks and gatherings are something separate,

utterly unconnected with our existence, with our daily conduct.

If this is possible - one hopes it is -

we can then go into very, very complex problems of life.

To approach a complex problem

- because our life is very, very complex,

the society is very complex, relationship is very complex,

our labour, going to the office, all that,

the whole psychological as well as social, outward existence,

is extraordinarily complex.

There is no ready answer.

There is a ready answer if one goes through with it,

sees it clearly right from the beginning.

Our life is complex therefore we must approach it very simply.

That will be our difficulty,

because our brains are very complex,

they have had thousands of experiences,

have accumulated great knowledge,

both biologically, psychologically, externally.

We have great knowledge about almost everything.

I do not know if you have seen lately on the television

the birth of a child, how it is conceived,

all the complexity of the cells and so on.

So our brain is a very complex machine.

To understand that we must approach it very, very simply.

But we have very complex minds - brains.

We are never directly simple.

Simplicity is not merely having one meal

or few clothes, and so on,

that is very complex too.

Simplicity means to have no prejudice,

like and dislike,

no personality entering into it.

To look at the beautiful sky of an evening,

with the sun just over the hills,

the radiance, the extraordinary light and the clarity,

to observe all that requires great simplicity of brain,

not chattering everlastingly.

It requires that sense of silence

to observe the great immensity of a sunset.

So if all this is fairly clear between us,

then we can proceed.

But please this is just the foundation,

the first couple of bricks.

Unless we lay very deep foundations

you cannot go very far.

The first movement matters enormously.

Whether that movement is precise

- which is the brick -

precise, correct, impersonal,

and it becomes impersonal when you are considering the whole of life,

objective, non-romantic and without sentimentality.

And that is what we are doing now, laying the first brick.

Having laid it, if you are willing, if you are pursuing it,

then we must enquire into a very complex problem

which is time.

We are together, I am not - the speaker is not telling you,

but we are together observing it.

To observe is not through the words

but just to look,

to look with y our eyes first,

so the perception is very clear.

That perception is denied

when you have problems;

when you have problems you can't see clearly

- right?

So together be free for this morning at least

to observe the whole content, the significance of time.

Because we live by time

- sunrise, sunset, the evening star, and the morning light,

the dark and lightness.

There is the time of yesterday,

time as tomorrow, time as now.

Time is now as you are sitting there.

So there is time to cover a distance from here to there,

time to learn a language,

time to write a letter,

time to acquire skills,

time to experience.

So we live by time,

both outwardly, externally and inwardly.

Please this is very important to understand

because we are going into something

which both of us must really understand,

not just theoretically,

not in an abstract sense but actually.

Because if we understand the nature of time,

then perhaps there is a possibility of understanding

that which is beyond time. That is much more complex.

Don't jump to that.

First we must understand what is,

what actually is.

And therefore we are enquiring into what is time.

You are enquiring too.

As we said, time to cover a distance from here to your home,

to become an excellent carpenter,

to become a great scientist,

to write a great novel, requires time.

And so on.

And also there is time inwardly:

I will be, I must be,

I must achieve enlightenment - whatever that may mean!

I must reach God, Heaven - you know, all that implies time.

I am this, violent, but give me time and I will be free of violence.

Please see this actual fact in yourself.

The speaker is acting merely as a mirror

in which you can see yourself.

When you see yourself clearly the mirror can be thrown away.

The mirror is not important

but what is important is what you see in the mirror.

The mirror, if it is clear,

without any distortion,

it shows exactly what your face - how you look and so on.

So we are together enquiring into time.

We have described time outside,

by the watch.

We met here exactly at ten thirty,

it was exact when I sat on the platform.

And there is time also inwardly.

One is an apprentice

and gradually one becomes the master,

that takes time.

You are a business clerk in an organisation

and if you are good at it, you become gradually the manager.

That attitude, that way of thinking has spilled, has extended over

into the psychological world

- I am this, I will be that - right?

We are understanding each other?

So there is time outside, by the clock;

time inwardly, time between now and death.

Right?

Now we are going to enquire much more deeply

into the nature of time.

First of all one must use our brains to find out, not just accept.

The intellect's function is to discern,

judge, evaluate,

but if you brush aside

the intellect as being too lopsided

- intellect is part of our structure,

part of our being, as emotions.

But if you merely cling to your emotions

and say intellect doesn't matter,

or if you are merely intellectual

- so we must have the capacity to look at the whole of it

with our brains, with our intellect, with our feelings,

with our nerves and our entire being - right?

If you can do it.

That is why it requires great attention,

watching every movement of thought.

I don't know if you have ever done that.

Watching without trying to distort every thought,

never letting a single thought escape.

That requires attention, watchfulness, great self awareness.

So time there is as the past,

the present and the future.

Right?

Time as the past,

all the accumulated knowledge, experience, all the incidents,

the things that we have done which we regret,

the things we want to do, which is the future,

the things that are being done now - right?

So the present, the now, is the past

- of course -

is the present and also the future - right?

Do we understand each other, this?

Because it is important to understand

in order to communicate what we are going to say still further.

We are saying,

the speaker is saying that all time, all time

is contained in the now.

That is, the past is contained in the now

- that is simple, you can see that.

You are your past

- right?

Your memories, your incidents, your experiences, your failures,

your regrets, your remorse, your guilts,

all the tradition that you have been brought up in,

both the religious and sectarian,

the whole of the past is time. Right?

We are supposed to be on this earth as human beings

forty five thousand years, or more.

Think of the vast accumulated knowledge that we have had.

Forty five thousand years of striving,

conflict, misery, unhappiness, joy, sorrow - right?

All that is the past.

Clear?

All that is now, as you are sitting there, all that is what you are now.

And the now also contains the future.

I will show it to you.

You see, I am showing it to you - I don't -

you understand, you are not meeting it.

Like two friends walking along in a shady lane,

talking about all this.

Two great friends who have known each other for some time.

There is no animosity between them, no defence, no aggression,

two old friends who have known each other for many years,

talked together,

perhaps belong to the same club, same tie,

same way of talking,

they know each other extraordinarily well.

And they are not trying to convince each other of anything,

and they are asking this question:

what is time, what is the now?

The now, one says to the other,

contains all time

because what you are now you will be tomorrow - right?

So tomorrow is now.

Have you understood?

I am prejudiced now,

I like and dislike people,

and tomorrow I will be prejudiced,

I still will like and dislike - right?

So tomorrow, the future is now.

Is this clear?

Have we understood each other?

Please, this is very important to understand this.

Not the speaker is putting an extraordinary,

some kind of exotic, oriental nonsense.

When the Orientals bring something it will be nonsense

but if you can see this point for yourself,

that all time, the past, the present and the future,

is contained now

- right?

I am what I have been,

and what I will be is what I am now.

If I don't change now,

I will be tomorrow exactly what I am - clear?

Are we together in this?

- not verbally, not theoretically but actually -

that we now contain all time,

apart from learning a language, learning a skill

- you understand? -

writing a letter,

that requires time,

to come from one place to another, that requires time,

but psychologically, inwardly, all time is now.

Right?

You see the danger of it?

You see the difficulty of it,

that there is no tomorrow,

there is only now.

That means there is no becoming - right?

There is no psychological evolution at all.

Now this is... you understand?

It is not 'I am going to achieve something'

- that means time.

Do you understand?

Suppose I want to be illuminated - whatever that may mean, quotes!

I want to find truth, all the rest of it.

That means in the future - right? Clear?

The future is now, what I am - right?

If I don't fundamentally change

the future is what I am tomorrow - right?

What I am now tomorrow - clear?

Then from there we can go on

to something very complex.

If we see the truth of this,

that there is no psychological evolution at all.

There is no becoming, there is no what I am

but what I will be.

The future is now

- if I don't radically change now,

I will be exactly tomorrow what I am.

Right?

That means seeing the truth

that there is no psychological becoming.

The psyche, which is the essence of the self,

thinks in terms of becoming - right?

Do you follow all this?

This is not an intellectual feat. This is a simple, obvious fact.

Christianity has one way of expressing it

- resurrection, reaching God,

attaining Heaven,

which is expressed in the Asiatic world differently,

but it is the same movement

- right?

That is, I am this, I will gradually become that.

That is, never to think in terms of graduality - gradualness.

You understand all this?

I need time gradually to learn a skill - right?

I need many years to learn to dance well in a ballet,

from childhood I must begin.

To play the violin I must begin when I am very young,

if I have got the talent, if I have got the passion behind it.

And also I feel the same movement is carried over

into the psychological area,

I must one day reach. Right?

That is why you belong to various groups, various gurus,

you put on various dresses,

robes to be different, because you want to achieve something.

So if you see the truth, the absolute truth

that all time is contained in the now,

to realise the depth of it is rather frightening.

When you say, 'I hope to see you tomorrow',

'I love you tomorrow'

- you understand?

So either that love is now in its entirety

or not at all.

If this is very clear,

the absolute clarity of it,

that the psyche has no future

- you understand? -

that you have no future.

That is because what you are now you will be,

unless fundamental mutation

- which is a biological word but a good word to use -

unless there is fundamental mutation now,

you will be what you are tomorrow.

So, realising that as an actuality,

not a theory, not a supposition,

not some ideal, all that nonsense,

but fact,

then we must begin to enquire

into what is action?

Into what is relationship?

Into what is change?

Right?

Change, action and relationship

- right?

If I understand, if that truth that all time is now,

then what is my action,

what is then action?

Please enquire, don't go to sleep.

Sorry. Forgive me.

If the speaker is emphatic please it is not that he is aggressive.

The speaker feels very strongly about these matters.

Humanity is destroying itself - right?

All over the world terrible things are happening.

They are preparing all kinds of horrors,

the scientists throughout the world.

Gas warfare, germ warfare,

these terrible missiles,

atom bombs, neutron bombs.

We were at one of the centres where they are preparing all these

- top scientists.

We casually go on every day of our life

not paying any attention to all that.

When you are aware of all the things happening in the world,

which is you, round you,

you feel utterly responsible,

not for yourself, for this whole humanity,

not just for Switzerland.

I know this means nothing to most of us

because we just want to go on

with our old traditions, our old habits,

our old defensive mechanisms and so on.

So when we realise all time is now,

what a marvellous truth,

then what is action?

What is our present action?

We must begin with the actual to find out what real action is,

which has no future.

You understand what I am saying?

What is our present action?

Action, the doing?

It is either based on memory, the past - right?

Memory which has been accumulated

through various experiments, experiences,

so the past dictates action. Right?

Are you following? Please come on.

Or the future dictates the action,

the ideal, the theoretical concept of the communists,

dialecticism, you know all that.

So action is according to the past memories,

past remembrances, past hates, past dislikes,

past prejudices, past personal attitudes,

that is all the past.

According to that past there is action - right?

Whether in the scientific world, or in the psychological world.

Action there is invention - right?

Do you understand?

Are we together in all this, or am I going off by myself?

There is a collection of top scientists in a certain place,

Los Alamos in New Mexico in America,

they invited the speaker to talk to them.

There were seven hundred top scientists of America

creating all the things for war.

They asked: what is creation in science?

You understand?

What is creation in science?

I said there is no creation in science,

there is only invention.

We will go into that apart.

What the speaker wants to explain is

that the past is so formidable, so strong

that guides, controls, shapes our action - right?

Or you have a future ideal,

future theories,

and act according to those theories

as approximatingly as possible - right?

Past memories and the future theories,

ideals, concepts, dogmas, faith.

So action is based on these two principles

- right? Clear? Of course, this is simple.

But when one realises all action is now,

there is no future action - you understand?

Because the future is now.

I must go over it.

If that is not clear

that all time is now, contained in the now - right?

You agreed two minutes ago,

at least you shook your heads, some of you,

indicating that you were following, you saw the fact of it.

Now if there is no future,

because the future is now and the past is now,

then what is action?

We said action as we know it now

is based on the past - memories, regrets,

guilt, experience, which is all knowledge,

or the future, the ideal, the concepts - right?

Theories, faiths, you act according to that.

So you are acting according to the past or to the future.

But the past and the future are now - right?

So what is action?

You understand my question?

Please do - don't give up.

What is action when all time is now?

What is your answer?

What is your deep truthful answer?

When the brain - listen to it -

when the brain is conditioned to act

according to the past, or to the future,

and when the truth is all time is now,

therefore there is no future, but now.

The future is contained in the now,

and the past is contained in the now.

You understand all this?

So what is action?

I can tell you, but, you see, you are waiting for me to tell you.

Too bad, you are not really going into it.

You are waiting for somebody to explain all this.

Suppose there was nobody to explain to you,

what will you do?

You have seen the truth of something

- the truth that all time, the past, the future, is in the now.

You see it.

And you meet a man who says, 'Look, what is action?',

and leaves you.

And you have to find out

because when once you have seen the truth that all time is now,

that truth will never leave you.

You understand?

It is like a thorn, like an arrow in your body

that will not be extracted, pulled out.

So you have to answer it.

And you won't answer it because you are incapable of answering it,

because our brain is conditioned to the past action,

action according to the past, or according to the future.

So one has to tackle that problem first:

whether the brain can be free from the past.

Careful now.

I need memory to function in the world - right?

To go to my office, to work in the laboratory

or in a factory, or some skill,

I need a great deal of time, a great deal of knowledge.

There, there is a becoming there - right?

I don't know but I will know.

That same movement, same - it is extended,

that same thought is extended into the psychological world.

I am this, I will be that - right?

Now you perhaps have seen for yourself very clearly

the truth that all time is now.

And the speaker says, find out what is action.

Right?

Your action has been according to the past memories, past training,

past experience, which has conditioned the brain,

and also conditioned the brain to the future idea, ideal, concept,

I must be, and so on.

Can the brain be free of these two? You understand?

Are you following all this?

You understand my question, sirs? (Yes).

Can the brain, which has been conditioned

to act according to past memories,

or thought has projected a concept, an ideal, a theory,

according to which you are acting.

The brain is conditioned that way.

Can the brain be free of that,

otherwise you will never find out what action now is

- you understand?

I can - somebody can explain but it won't be -

the depth of your own understanding.

Clear?

I'll explain it. I'll go into it.

This will be a verbal explanation, naturally.

It won't be something you yourself have discovered,

and therefore truth and therefore live according to it.

We have to enquire into what is perception,

seeing, perceiving.

One perceives the fact actually that all time is now.

That is a fact.

Irrevocable fact.

No other clever man comes along and says,

'It is not like that'.

If what you have discovered is truth,

then you can meet any challenge.

You won't be bowled over.

Questioner: I don't know the answer but I can feel...

K: Listen, madam, you can ask your question,

write it down and we will answer it, not now.

I hope you don't mind.

What is action,

which is totally independent of the past and the future?

Right? What is action

which is not dependent on the past or the future - right?

Is there an action

which is so complete now,

not fragmented - you understand?

That is my action - human action is based on the past or the future,

therefore it is fragmented - right?

It is broken up.

So we are asking: is there an action

which is totally free of fragmentation?

I don't know if you see the beauty of the question itself?

Therefore there is

- the speaker says there is such an action.

And that action is to see -

the seeing is the doing.

There is no interval of time between the seeing, perceiving,

understanding and the doing.

The understanding, perceiving, the seeing, is action itself.

Say, for instance -

I am working so hard, come on!

One perceives very clearly,

objectively, without any bias,

that all organised religions throughout the world,

all of them are based on superstition,

faith, belief, tradition.

Obviously.

With their various forms of rituals, dresses,

fancy dresses and so on and so on.

You see that is put together by thought,

whether the ancient thought or present thought,

it is put together by thought. Right?

Therefore as thought being limited it must be limited.

Because thought - I will briefly explain it to you -

thought is the outcome of memory.

Memory is part of knowledge.

Knowledge is the outcome of experience - right?

There is no complete knowledge.

In the scientific world they are adding knowledge - right?

- bit by bit, by bit.

A thousand people, or a hundred thousand people

are adding to it day after day, day after day - right?

Therefore the more is limited. Right?

So experience is limited.

The experience of a man who says, 'I have reached God' is limited.

Right?

So knowledge, whether now or in the future, is limited.

Therefore thought is limited

- right?

So anything that thought has put together

both externally or inwardly is limited - right?

So action based on thought is limited.

Get it?

Hear it for the first time for god's sake.

All action, if it is based on thought,

will always be limited.

Therefore that which is limited

must invariably create conflict.

If I am thinking about myself all day long,

as most people do,

it is a very small affair - right?

I must practise, I must meditate,

I must not do this, I must not do that - you follow?

I must seek, I must have no conflict, I must meditate.

It is all very self-centred activity

and therefore it is very limited - right?

So thought is limited.

Is there an action

which is not based on thought?

Thought is the past

- all the memories, all the tradition, all that.

And thought also has projected the future,

the ideal, the communist theories

- it is still limited.

So if we are acting according to the past or to the future,

it is still limited - right?

Therefore breeding enormous conflict and confusion, obviously.

So is there an action

which is not based on the past or the future,

because all time is now?

Is there an action which is so complete now?

You understand?

Which means,

seeing something clearly is to act instantly.

I see very clearly, the speaker sees very clearly

to belong to any organisation,

specially spiritual organisations,

is utterly detrimental, limited,

therefore don't belong to anything.

Yes, sirs.

Because to belong to something gives us security.

We want to feel safe.

The guru knows, I don't, therefore I will follow him,

it is a form of self-deception, insecurity.

Right?

So one perceives that, and instant action.

The whole thing,

you are free of the whole so-called spiritual leadership.

That requires - you understand? -

it is not strength - mere perception of seeing 'what is'.

It is a quarter to twelve.

An hour and a quarter.

I hope you aren't tired.

We will continue on Tuesday morning.

Please if one may remind you, one must -

life is a complex,

you can't take parts of it and say, 'I understand' and go away,

it requires the whole of it, not just part of it.

We are only just beginning - a very small part of it.

We are going to talk about fear, relationship, meditation, sorrow,

the whole complex problem of our daily living.

If you read a book, you don't read the first chapter,

you must go through to the very end of it.

Not we are inviting you to come to all the meetings,

I don't care -

the speaker doesn't care if you come or don't come,

but what is important is,

if you begin, go to the very end of it,

don't stop in the middle of it. Right?

Put all your energy into it.

May I get up now?

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét