Thứ Bảy, 3 tháng 6, 2017

Youtube daily US Jun 3 2017

(Graphic: Experts Discuss Impacts of U.S. Leaving Paris Climate Accord)

(Tim Profeta) Recently President Trump announced his with withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

on Climate Change.

I am Tim Profeta the director of the Nicholas Institute here at Duke University.

I'm here with my colleague Brian Murray, the director of the Energy Initiative to talk

about the implications of this action by President Trump.

Brian would you like to offer any thoughts on what this means?

(Brian Murray) Sure Tim, thank you.

I think I'm going to hit on two points here, I'm going to explain briefly what the scientific

rational is behind the Paris Accord.

And then talk a little bit about the policy mechanism that comes out of it.

The scientific rational is that there has been a long-term accumulation of green house

gasses in the atmosphere that has basically been a result of industrialization and energy

use that's accumulated and that is causing a climate threat.

This has been long recognized in the scientific community that it is the accumulation of green

house gases that's causing this problem.

Which means that as a society if we address the problem we have to figure out ways to

reduce the green house gases.

About 20 some odd years ago, the UN came together and formed what's called the UN Framework

Convention on Climate Change that says we have to figure out what to do about anthropogenic

climate change.

And where that process has led is to the Paris Agreement which was an agreement by 195 countries

to take actions to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

The United States is the world's largest economy and the second largest emitter of

greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

By stepping aside from the Paris Agreement and the commitments there of, that leaves

a significant hole in global efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and climate change risks.

So Tim, I guess one question might be then, with that in mind what does this mean for

the Trump Administration and with policy efforts in Washington and other parts in the United

States in terms of how were going to address the climate problem?

(Tim Profeta) Thanks Brian, to some degree this means a lot and some degree it means

a little.

I think that it was clear from the Trump Administrations policies already that they were going to roll

back many of the things the Obama Administration had put in place to meet the targets of the

Paris Accord.

So there may not be much of change in terms of what the policy on the ground will be.

But it does leave that hole in the Paris Agreement of the United States, second largest emitter.

And also it removes U.S. global leadership on this global problem.

For the first time really in our generation the U.S. is not going to be part of the design

of a solution to a great problem like this.

And for our businesses not part of the design of the markets that will be created as we

move towards cleaner technologies.

There also is a loss of some of the structure the Paris Agreement put into place to address this issue.

As you said, there's 195 nations that are part of the agreement. Each have come forward with what they thought they could do to make reductions

Bu the key to the Paris Agreement was the universal participation. Everybody made a commitment.

And then there was a check in and adjustment process to allow the nations to get down the path to where we need to go in our green house gas admissions.

(Brian Murray) Tim, I think what was important about that was how we got to Paris is that

the predecessor agreement to Paris, the Kyoto Protocol, did not have universal participation

and it was really considered dead on arrival in Washington that we would be able to advance

something that didn't have universal participation.

So the Paris Accord itself was really designed with Washington in mind and that's sort

of almost the ironic part about this.

Would you agree?

(Tim Profeta) Absolutely.

In fact, you know, you look at India and China.

Throughout our debate on climate change, we've always looked at India and China and whether

they will have to move in step with us or whether we will have to move first.

In Paris, India and China took strides to make reductions themselves, and sort of tried

to take that issue away from the political debate in Washington.

But nonetheless, United States is stepping away.

The last thing I want to ask is how durable a change this is for the United States.

This is an issue that's very politically volatile in the United States.

We seem to swing back and forth between taking action on climate change and not and there's

really a question of whether this is a change that lasts past the Trump presidency.

In fact, the steps that the United States has to take to withdraw, slights the United

States officially withdraw right at the election in 2020.

So one thing I think we do know is this issue has been put firmly on the ballot for our

next presidential election.

(Brian Murray) Well Tim, we talked about durability and that really brings up the issue of what

the mission is at Duke for trying to advance and accessible, affordable and reliable clean

energy system.

And that mission is completely undeterred by what has happened recently in the White

House in a declaration by this administration.

We will continue to educate tomorrow's leaders, to conduct and support cutting edge research

and low carbon, climate friendly technologies and to engage with policy makers in the public

and private sector to try to advance those solutions moving forward.

I think we remain undeterred from that.

(Tim Profeta) Absolutely.

And thank you Brian for taking the time to talk with us today.

(Brian Murray) Ok.

Thank you.

(Tim Profeta) Cheers.

For more infomation >> Duke Experts Discuss Impact of U.S. Leaving Paris Climate Accord - Duration: 5:29.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Defense Secretary Reassures Asia-Pacific Nations - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> U.S. Defense Secretary Reassures Asia-Pacific Nations - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

HELP US ON PATREON For MORE ANIMAL VIDEOS - ANIMAL FACTS - Duration: 0:21.

We'd like to invite you over to our Patreon page. While this is fun for us

it's become my full-time job and YouTube ads just don't quite cut it. So um so any

pledge will help a lot. Thank you!

For more infomation >> HELP US ON PATREON For MORE ANIMAL VIDEOS - ANIMAL FACTS - Duration: 0:21.

-------------------------------------------

DPR Spartak: It's impossible to kill us!/ДНР Спартак: Нас не истребить! - Duration: 6:46.

- Hello.

Do you live here?

- Yes.

- Long time, the whole war?

- Whole war.

- Didn't go anywhere?

- Where would I go to?

I was born here,

I have had everything of my life happening here.

How would I leave?

It's not possible to move at my age

and to change future.

There is no point for me to leave.

When this war is over,

God willing, I'll rebuild my house

and leave something to my children.

- How many people are left in Spartak?

- 70 people.

- How is situation now?

How was last night, for instance?

- I can tell you one thing: it's getting worse every day!

We don't expect any improvement.

So...

I don't know how it will end.

- I heard there was an impact in a center of Spartak,

where humanitarian aid is distributed.

- That's where it was:

near the porch.

But it was not only here,

7 mines landed in total.

Shop was smashed, behind the shop.

And over here, a bit to the left.

Another impact there.

We are used to everything here.

But we are fed up with all this...

- How did you survive winter?

- Well, with God's help...

It would be hard to survive without volunteers.

Volunteers provided us with chains for the saws,

coal and stoves.

Our people can survive anything!

We are like Colorado beetles, (the way they call us)

we are unkillable!

They are right, we are unkillable!

They should better leave is alone

and read history books.

Donbass has never been Ukrainian!

It was simply annexed

according to history.

And now they want to make Donbass people slaves.

But we are proud people,

we won't kneel,

I can assure you!

- Tell me how do you survive,

since you have no light, gas or water?

- You know,

after 3 years I'm living here,

I think it's a luxury!

Power, water, light, gas...

We should live the way our ancestors did.

They didn't have power back then and we don't either.

We are back to the beginning of the 19th century now

or maybe the end of the 18th century.

When they didn't have power and water was from the wells.

If you wanna live,

you'll survive any situation.

And if you don't wanna live,

he'll either give up or...

The most resilent people are staying here, I think.

- Are you helping each other here?

- Yes, we are.

However, frankly speaking,

some people start drinking.

Because with this kind of situation

some people simply can't handle it.

It's too much stress, so they turn to alcohol.

I'm being honest with you.

- Are you shelled usually in the day time or at night?

- Both, day and night.

Cause when we had an impact here,

thanks God that nobody was injured.

But most of the time shelling happens at night.

But that time they went beyond any limit,

and shelled in the day time.

- Do you ever feel scared here?

- Well, only fools don't get scared.

- Do you live in the basement or in your apartment?

- I used to live in the house, but it was bombed down.

So, I had to move to the basement. I'm sleeping there.

But the rest of the day I spend outside.

I got animals here.

I also have piglets and rabbits.

A garden.

- How is it possible to survive in the basement?

- Well, why surviving?

We are only sleeping there,

otherwise, we are staying outside.

It's more difficult during winter.

We didn't have light before,

but we found a solution now:

volunteers provide us with accu's and daylight lamps.

We have light,

it's not very bright though,

but it's possible to read a book

for those who want to.

The only problem we have now

that we have no TV.

We are not even used to it anymore.

Though, if I'm watching TV at work sometimes...

I'm not so used to it now.

And the news they are showing us,

especially from the Ukrainian side,

I don't wanna watch them.

- What would you like to say to our English-speaking viewers,

people from Europe, USA, Canada, Australia?

- Well, I would like to tell them

that they should realize - they are simply growing Nazism.

They provide financial aid

to so-called Ukrainian Army.

But there is no Ukrainian Army,

there are thugs only!

And when Europe is trying to help Ukraine,

it isn't really helping Ukraine,

it simply helps Ukraine to build a Nazi army!

And when this Nazi army becomes European concern,

they will realize then, what have they done.

So, they should give it good thinking

and come to understand that it's better to live in peace

than fight with each other!

For more infomation >> DPR Spartak: It's impossible to kill us!/ДНР Спартак: Нас не истребить! - Duration: 6:46.

-------------------------------------------

Putin Tells Megyn Kelly U.S. Hackers Could Have Potentially Framed Russia - Duration: 1:42.

For more infomation >> Putin Tells Megyn Kelly U.S. Hackers Could Have Potentially Framed Russia - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

US Air Force Vet Gets 35 Years in Prison for Trying to Join ISIS - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> US Air Force Vet Gets 35 Years in Prison for Trying to Join ISIS - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Gov. Baker Commits Massachusetts To U.S. Climate Alliance - Duration: 0:21.

ARE THEY STUPID?

IS HE ACCUSING THEM OF SOMEHOW

BUYING INTO A HOAX?

ALSO GOVERNOR CHARLIE BAKER

ANNOUNCED THE STATE WILL BE ONE

OF SEVERAL VOWING TO UPHOLD THE

INTERNATIONAL PACT.

THE DISTRACT GOVERNORS FROM

CALIFORNIA, NEW YORK,

WASHINGTON, CONNECTICUT AND

RHODE ISLAND ALSO JOINED THE SO-

CALLED UNITED STATES CLIMATE

ALLIANCE.

For more infomation >> Gov. Baker Commits Massachusetts To U.S. Climate Alliance - Duration: 0:21.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Defense Secretary Reassures Asia-Pacific Nations - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> U.S. Defense Secretary Reassures Asia-Pacific Nations - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Mylan May Have Overcharged US for EpiPen - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> Mylan May Have Overcharged US for EpiPen - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Syrian Army batters U.S backed fighters in Syrian Desert | Syrian arab Army: female Fighters - Duration: 1:36.

For more infomation >> Syrian Army batters U.S backed fighters in Syrian Desert | Syrian arab Army: female Fighters - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

《愛情高峰險》the Mountain Between Us 2017 電影預告中文字幕 - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> 《愛情高峰險》the Mountain Between Us 2017 電影預告中文字幕 - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Event To Help People Applying For U-S Citizenship For Free - Duration: 0:44.

THERAPY BUT CANNOT WAIT TO

START BIKING AGAIN SOON.

JEFF: BEST OF LUCK.

TWO LONG BEACH ORGANIZATIONS

HAVE ANNOUNCED A FREE EVENT TO

HELP PEOPLE APPLY FOR U.S.

CITIZENSHIP.

MOVING FORWARD, TEAMING UP TO

DAY LONG IMMIGRATION WORKSHOP.

ATTORNEYS AND HOSTS WILL GUIDE

PEOPLE THROUGH THE

APPLICATIONS.

ORGANIZERS ARE REACHING OUT TO

PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE

NATURALIZED CITIZENS BUT MAY

NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO FIND

HELP.

THE COST NORMALLY FOR FOLKS

TO COME OUT AND GET THE

SERVICES CAN RANGE ANYWHERE

FROM A THOUSAND TO FIVE

THOUSAND TO $10,000, BUT WE

WILL PROVIDE THE SERVICES FOR

FREE.

THE EVENT WILL RUN SATURDAY

For more infomation >> Event To Help People Applying For U-S Citizenship For Free - Duration: 0:44.

-------------------------------------------

U.S DEPLOYS NIMITZ, CARL VINSON & RONALD REAGAN CLOSE TO NORTH KOREA - Duration: 11:05.

In an unprecedented move, The United States is sending a third aircraft carrier strike

force to the western Pacific region, in an apparent warning to North Korea to stop its

ballistic missile and nuclear programs.

The USS Nimitz, will join the USS Carl Vinson and the USS Ronald Reagan,

in the western Pacific.

USS Nimitz was scheduled to be deployed to the Middle East, but now it has been rerouted

to the Western Pacific.

The USS Carl Vinson & the USS Ronald Reagan are already in the Sea of Japan.

James Fanell, former director of Intelligence and Information Operations for the U.S. Pacific

Fleet told: "I served in the U.S. Navy from 1986 to 2015, and I do not remember a time

that the U.S. has ever deployed three aircraft carrier strike groups to the Korean peninsula"

It must be noted that each of these ships lead their own Carrier Strike Group.

Each of the 3-strike group has at least one cruiser, a destroyer squadron of at least

two destroyers and or frigates, as well as nuclear powered submarine. Apart from that,

multiple Logistic ships and AWACS support them.

In this video, Defense Updates looks at the 3 most important components of the strike

group, namely the Carrier itself, the Destroyers, & the Submarines one by one, and analyzes

how powerful the combined force of 3 carriers strike group is?

All the 3 ships are of NIMITZ class.

The Nimitz-class supercarriers are a class of 10 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in

service with the United States Navy. The lead ship of the class is named for World War II

United States Pacific Fleet commander Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz.

Nimitz-class aircraft carriers were designed to be improvements on previous U.S. aircraft

carriers, in particular the Enterprise and Forrestal-class.

Nimitz CVN-68 was commissioned on 3 May 1975, Carl Vinson (CVN-70) on 13 March 1982 and

Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) on12 July 2003.

Nimitz-class ships each cost around $4.5 billion and have been the symbol of U.S power. They

have been used to project power far off from US mainland.

All 10 Nimitz-class aircraft carriers were constructed between 1968 and 2006 at Newport

News Shipbuilding Company, Virginia, in the largest dry-dock in the western hemisphere.

These are some of the largest vessels constructed. All the 3 ships have a displacement of around

100000 tons, and overall length of 332.8 m (1,092 feet). To give viewers a perspective,

it is about 3 football fields long.

Each of this ship is powered by two A4W nuclear reactors, kept in separate compartments.

These power 4 propeller shafts and can produce a maximum speed of over 30 knots or 56 km/h.

As a result of the use of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating continuously

for over 20 years without refueling, and are predicted to have a service life of over 50

years. Practically they have unlimited range.

All of these 3 super carriers have a flight group of more than 60 aircraft, including

F-18 jet fighters. These are twin-engine, supersonic, all-weather

carrier-capable 4th generation multirole fighter aircrafts.

They have a payload of 7700 kg (17000 lbs), and can carry ground attack weapons as well

as air-to-air missiles.

Nimitz class possesses multitude of different radars including electronically scanned array

3D radars. It is equipped with 16 to 24 RIM-7 Sea Sparrow

or NATO Sea Sparrow missiles. RIM-7 Sea Sparrow is a US ship-borne short-range anti-aircraft

and anti-missile weapon system, primarily intended for defense against anti-ship missiles.

Close in weapon (CIWS) duties are performed by Phalanx, & RIM-116 Rolling Airframe missile.

The Destroyer component of the Carrier Strike Group generally contains 1 or 2 Arleigh Burke-class

guided missile destroyers. The class is named for Admiral Arleigh Burke,

the most famous American destroyer officer of World War II, and later Chief of Naval

Operations. US Navy has 68 of these, each costing around

$1.843 billion.

Arleigh Burke-class warships are designed as multi mission destroyers capable of Anti

Aircraft Warfare (AAW), Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW), Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and

Anti Surface warfare (ASuW). These can operate in open sea or coastal waters.

Arleigh Burke class destroyers are among the largest destroyers in the world.

They have an overall length of about 505 to 509 feet (154 to 155 m) and displacement of

about 9,200 tons.

They have a speed of 30+ knots (55+ km/h) and range of 4,400 nmi (8,100 km).

The Arleigh Burke class of guided missile destroyers (DDGs) is the United States Navy's

first class of destroyer built around the Aegis Combat System.

The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System is a US Department of Defense Missile Defense

Agency program developed to provide defense against short to intermediate-range ballistic

missiles. Aegis BMD is designed to intercept ballistic missiles post-boost phase and prior

to reentry.

It enables Arleigh Burke destroyers to shoot down enemy ballistic missiles by expanding

the Aegis Combat System with the addition of the AN/SPY-1 radar and Standard missile

technologies. SM-3 missile having range of 2,500 km & speed of Mach 10.2 is expected

to be particularly effective.

Arleigh Burke class destroyers are one of the most heavily armed destroyers in the world

and are designed to be a multi weapons platform:

They have 96 cell Mk 41 VLS (Vertical Launch System), which can be configured with the combination of different

weapons, based on mission. Here are some important once.

1. Tomahawk cruise missile for Land attack 2. RIM-66M Standard medium range SAM for air defense

3. RIM-161 Standard Ballistic missile for AEGIS ballistic missile defense

It also has 2 × Mk 141 Harpoon Missile Launcher for Anti Ship role.

2 × Mark 32 triple torpedo tubes are present for launching Mk-46 or Mk-50 torpedoes

2 MH-60R Seahawk LAMPS III helicopters are also present for Anti Submarine Warfare.

Other than these, they are equipped with long-range naval gun and multiple Close In Weapon System.

The Virginia class, also known as the SSN-774 class, is a class of nuclear-powered fast

attack submarines (hull classification symbol SSN) in service with the United States Navy.

The submarines are designed for a broad spectrum of open-ocean and littoral (shallow coastal

water) missions. US Navy has 13 of these and also building

another 6. These cost around $ 1.8 billion each.

These have length of 377 ft (115 m) and displacement of around 7,900 metric tons

Being nuclear powered, these can stay underneath the ocean surface for an unlimited amount

of time, constrained by only food supply and maintenance requirements.

Powered by 30 MW, S9G reactor, these submarines can reach speed of 25 knots and can move down

to depths of 800 ft (240 m).

Virginia class is designed to take out enemy surface vessel, submarines as well as it can

strike ground targets.

With 12 VLS & 4 torpedo tubes, it is capable of launching UGM-109 Tactical Tomahawks, Harpoon

missile & Mark 48 torpedoes.

The Tomahawk is a long-range, all-weather, subsonic missile that is used for land- attacks.

At 5.56 m long without a booster, traveling at 880 km per hour, it is capable of delivering

more than 450 kilograms of conventional explosives.

Harpoon missile having speed of 537 miles per hours, and range of around 120 km plays

the role of anti ship missile.

Mark 48 torpedoes have effective firing range of 38 km, and have a 650 lb warhead. A single

hit from this torpedo can be deadly for any ship or submarine.

The combined force of 3-carrier strike group will have around 200 F 18 strike aircrafts.

The MiG-29 is the K P A F's most modern fighter and North Korea operates approximately 40

of these. F 18 aircrafts equipped with modern air-to-air

missile and coupled with US fighter pilot's better training and strategy will be able

to take out the North Korean air force in few hours.

North Korea has no Destroyers and has very few Frigates and Corvettes. The vessels are

no match for the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.

The North Korean military is in possession of a fleet of about 70 submarines, comprised

of approximately 20 Romeo class submarines (1,800 tons), 40 Sang-O class submarines (300

tons) and 10 Yono class submarines (130 tons).

These submarines being small and fairly silent have the potential to sneak in close to US

Carrier Strike Group. But given the Carrier Strike Group will have cover from P-8 Poseidon

Anti Submarine aircraft, apart from its own submarine and Anti submarine warfare capable

Arleigh Burke-class, chances of North Korean vessels causing major damage is unlikely.

In simple terms, the 3 carrier strike group is expected to decimate the North Korean forces in few days.

For more infomation >> U.S DEPLOYS NIMITZ, CARL VINSON & RONALD REAGAN CLOSE TO NORTH KOREA - Duration: 11:05.

-------------------------------------------

California Senate Passes Single-Payer Healthcare - Duration: 9:28.

YESTERDAY THE CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE PASSED A

SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE BILL.

THAT SOUNDS LIKE FAKE NEWS, BUT

IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED AND I THINK IT'S STILL FAR FROM BEING LAW

BUT IT'S AN IMPORTANT FIRST STEP WITH BIG HURDLES COMING, DETAILS

ABOUT HOW TO PAY FOR IT, ESTIMATES OF COST ARE HIGH,

SOMETHING LIKE $400 BILLION, PEOPLE THROW AROUND THAT IT IS A

DOUBLING OF THE STATE BUDGET, OF COURSE, HEALTHCARE IS EXPENSIVE

WHETHER INDIVIDUALS PAY FOR IT OR THE GOVERNMENT IS.

THAT IS

OFTEN LOST IN THESE DECLARATIONS ABOUT HOW EXPENSIVE SINGLE-PAYER

HEALTH CARE IS FOR SOME REASON.

BUT NOW IT WILL PROCEED TO THE

ASSEMBLY, MORE DETAILS WILL HAVE TO BE FLESHED OUT ABOUT HOW THIS

WOULD HAPPEN, BUT IT DOES LAY OUT A SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE

PLAN, A GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTHCARE PLAN, FOR THE SIXTH

BIGGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD.

WE HAVE TO GIVE CREDIT --

THE NURSES UNION IS AMAZING.

EVERYWHERE.

APPROPRIATELY, THE NURSES ARE COMING TO HEAL THE COUNTRY.

LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS -- THERE ARE GOOD ARGUMENTS AGAINST IT,

BECAUSE EVEN THE LEGISLATORS THAT VOTED FOR IT ARE SAYING

IT'S NOT QUITE COMPLETE --

IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS.

A STARTING OFF POINT, BASICALLY.

TO GIVE YOU A SENSE OF HOW MUCH IT'S NOT DONE YET, THEY

HAVE TO PASS ANOTHER BILL WHICH INVOLVES THE TAXES, THE PARTNER

YOU ACTUALLY RAISE THE MONEY FOR IT, AND I THINK JOHN

ALLUDED TO, THAT'S ABOUT $400 BILLION.

IF I COULD RUN THROUGH ONE MORE GRAPHIC, THERE HAVE BEEN

VARIOUS ANALYSES OF THE EFFECTS, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE SWITCHED

TO SINGLE-PAYER, ONE IS HOW WE WOULD PAY FOR IT, AND --

I WILL GET TO THAT IN A SECOND, BUT I WANT PEOPLE TO

UNDERSTAND -- IN ORDER TO PASS THE TAXES IN CALIFORNIA YOU NEED

A TWO THIRDS VOTE IN BOTH CHAMBERS.

SO THE SENATE HAS TO

GO BACK AND PASS IT BY TWO THIRDS, INCLUDING THE TAXES, AND

THEN THE HOUSE, OR THE ASSEMBLY IN CALIFORNIA, HAS TO ALSO PASS

IT BY A TWO THIRDS VOTE IN ORDER FOR IT TO COME INTO EFFECT,

AND RBC THE GOVERNOR WOULD HAVE TO SIGN IT.

AND THE VOTERS WOULD HAVE TO VOTE ON IT, AND THE STATE WOULD

HAVE TO VOTE ON REPURPOSING THEIR MEDICAID AND MEDICARE

FUNDS AS WELL.

ASSUMING THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ALLOWS THOSE

FUNDS TO BE USED FOR IT.

THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED.

I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA SO LET'S TURN TO THE TAXES, ALL THE

QUESTION MARKS, I THINK WE WILL BEGIN TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTION

MARKS.

WHEN I SAW 15% PAYROLL TAX INCREASE -- THAT'S A LOT.

THAT IS QUITE A BIT. AND THEN OF COURSE YOU REALIZE, BUT YOU

DON'T HAVE TO PAY FOR HEALTHCARE.

AT ALL.

SO YOUR

PREMIUMS ARE GONE.

AND ANY KIND OF CONTRIBUTION, GONE.

WHICH A LOT OF BUSINESSES HAVE TO PAY.

OVERALL THAT SAVES CALIFORNIA MONEY, BECAUSE IT LOWERS DRUG

PRICES, AND MY INTERVIEW WITH GEORGE HALVERSON, FORMER CEO OF

KAISER PERMANENTE, IS ENLIGHTENING ON THAT ISSUE.

AND

ANYWAY OF COURSE YOU WILL ELIMINATE A LOT OF OVERHEAD THAT

YOU PAY, THAT WE PAY TO THE MIDDLEMEN.

SO AT THE END OF THE

DAY AS A CALIFORNIA RESIDENT I WOULD SAVE MONEY, PERHAPS A LOT

OF MONEY.

AND WHEN YOU DO THAT EQUATION YOU GO, I GET IT, I'M

PAYING MORE IN TAXES BUT I GET TO KEEP ALL THE OTHER MONEY, SO

IF AT THE END OF THE DAY I'VE SAVED WHATEVER THE NUMBER IS,

100 BUCKS, WHO CARES THAT I PAID MORE TAXES?

I HAVE MORE MONEY IN

THE BANK, AND POTENTIALLY MUCH BETTER HEALTH INSURANCE.

AND A MORE JUST SOCIETY.

THAT IS ONE THAT'S DEBATED.

WHAT DO I THINK OVERALL?

I THINK

IT'S A GREAT, GREAT STEP FORWARD.

BECAUSE EVERYBODY IS

LIKE, LET'S PAUSE, LET'S DO THIS, GRADUALISM -- THIS IS

ACTION.

ACTION OVER INACTION.

IF YOU ARE DOING TERRIBLE,

DISASTROUS ACTIONS LIKE TRUMP, THEY HAVE FLOWING CONSEQUENCES

THAT ARE NEGATIVE.

BUT IF YOU DO I THINK POSITIVE ACTION, WHICH I

VIEW THIS TO BE POSITIVE, IT MIGHT HAVE SURPRISING FLOWING

CONSEQUENCES FROM THAT.

IT'S ON THE BOARD NOW, THE OTHER CHAMBER

HAS TO CONSIDER IT, AND NOW WE HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT IT, WE

ARE DOING A STORY ON IT, AND EVERY MEDIA OUTLET IN CALIFORNIA

IS DOING A STORY ON IT AND HAVING PEOPLE GO, WAIT, I WOULD

SAVE MONEY?

THAT'S INTERESTING.

IF YOU ARE IN CALIFORNIA OR NOT, SHOW SUPPORT TO THE

POLITICIANS WHO HAVE ALREADY SUPPORTED IT, I THINK THAT'S A

GREAT WAY TO REINFORCE FOR THEM THAT THEY SHOULD CONTINUE TO

WANT TO MOVE IN THIS DIRECTION, PERHAPS THEY COULD PROVIDE AN

EXAMPLE FOR POLITICIANS NOT ALREADY ON BOARD, AND IT COULD

BE A GOOD SIGNAL POST FOR WHEN IT GETS TO THE ASSEMBLY.

BUT YOU

DID A GREAT JOB OF BREAKING DOWN AS A BUSINESS OWNER HOW THIS

WOULD AFFECT YOU, THEY WILL THROW AROUND THE 15% TAX ON

PAYROLL HOPING THAT YOU WILL NEVER FIND OUT ABOUT THE VARIOUS

MONEY YOU WILL SAVE, BUT THINK ABOUT THE POINT OF VIEW OF A

BUSINESS THAT NOW THERE IS THIS ONE PLACE, WHICH IS ALREADY A

GREAT STATE, BUT NOW A STATE WHERE YOU WILL HAVE HEALTH

INSURANCE -- YOU WILL HAVE PEOPLE MOVE TO THIS STATE TO

LIVE HERE, PAY TAXES HERE, BUY PRODUCTS HERE, AND THE PEOPLE

WHO WOULD BE SPENDING HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EVERY

MONTH ON HEALTH INSURANCE SUDDENLY HAVE THAT MONEY.

AND WE

ALL KNOW WE ARE BIG SAVERS IN AMERICA -- KNOW WE ARE NOT, WE

WILL SPEND IT ON PRODUCTS AND SERVICES WHICH WILL BE AMAZING

FOR THE CALIFORNIA ECONOMY.

SO THIS DOESN'T JUST PRODUCE A MORE

JUST SOCIETY AND SAVE COUNTLESS PEOPLE FROM PREMATURE,

UNNECESSARY DEATH, IT ALSO WOULD BE AN ENORMOUS ECONOMIC

STIMULUS FOR CALIFORNIA.

THAT IS PROBABLY TRUE.

WE DON'T KNOW YET, WE DON'T KNOW

HOW THEY WILL GET THERE.

JUST LAID OUT THE STEPS OF HOW

DIFFICULT IT WOULD BE TO GET THERE.

BUT POLITICALLY IT'S A

HUGE FIRST STEP, IT CHANGES THE NATURE OF THE CONVERSATION.

THE

SENATE IN CALIFORNIA HAS VOTED FOR IT.

BARBARA BOXER, WHO

CLAIMS -- I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT'S TRUE, BUT LET'S ASSUME SHE

WAS TELLING THE TRUTH -- SORRY, NANCY POSEY, FORGIVE ME --

HOW DID YOU CONFUSE THEM?

SO STRANGE -- SHE SAYS SHE HAS FOUGHT FOR SINGLE-PAYER ALL

HER LIFE BUT SHE REALIZED IT COULDN'T PASS FOR THE AFFORDABLE

CARE ACT, AND THEN SHE SAYS HER WAY OF DISMISSING A FIGHT NOW

FOR SINGLE-PAYER IS, IT NEEDS TO BE TRIED IN THE STATES.

DIANNE

FEINSTEIN SAYS THE SAME THING.

SURE, IT MIGHT WORK, LET'S TRY

IT IN THE STATES.

OKAY, HERE WE GO, IT IS YOUR STATE, AND IF IT

WORKS, THEN THE REASON USED BY AT LEAST DEMOCRATS --

REPUBLICANS WILL STILL BE AGAINST IT -- BUT THE REASON

USED BY MOST DEMOCRATS BEING AGAINST IT, THOSE WHO ARE

AGAINST IT, WILL EVAPORATE, AND I SUSPECT THEY WILL COME ABOARD.

AND I BELIEVE PELOSI MORE THAN FEINSTEIN ON THIS IN TERMS OF

THEIR COMMITMENT, BECAUSE PELOSI HAS AT DIFFERENT TIMES BEEN

COMMITTED TO THIS.

WHAT IS SO GREAT ABOUT THIS ALSO IS LET'S

SAY IT FAILS, LET'S SAY IT FAILS AT THE ASSEMBLY OR THE STATE OR

THE GOVERNOR'S DESK OR THE BALLOT BOX OR THE CONSTITUTION

-- IT'S STILL THE PLACE WHERE IT STARTED.

YOU HAD A LEGISLATIVE

BODY VOTE FOR SOMETHING THAT IS GOOD FOR PEOPLE, AND PEOPLE WILL

LOOK BACK AND SAY THIS IS WHERE IT STARTED, AND GOVERNMENT CAN

ACTUALLY COME IN AND HELP.

PEOPLE SAY POLITICS IS THE ART

OF THE POSSIBLE -- THIS WILL SHOW HOW IT'S POSSIBLE, HOW IN

SOME CASES IT'S IMPOSSIBLE, BUT THIS IS WHERE IT STARTED AND

IT'S SOMETHING THAT STARTED IN CALIFORNIA, WHERE IT IS

POSSIBLE.

I THINK THAT'S GREAT.

LAST THING ON POLITICS AND POLICY, CHECK OUT THE HALVERSON

INTERVIEW, WHERE HE SAYS IT WORKS SO MUCH BETTER IN EUROPE,

THIS GUY WAS THE CEO OF KAISER PERMANENTE, HE KNOWS A THING OR

TWO ABOUT THIS.

AND ON THE POLITICS THING, IT PUTS PEOPLE

LIKE FEINSTEIN IN A TOUGH SPOT, SHE'S ON THE RECORD AS SAYING

IT'S NOT REALISTIC, SING A PAYER -- SO NOW WHEN YOUR OWN STATE

PASSES IT IN THE SENATE, NOW HOW DOES SHE MAKE THE ARGUMENT THAT

IT'S NOT PRACTICAL?

BECAUSE THAT WOULD THEN BE DEFYING HER OWN

PARTY IN HER OWN STATE.

THAT'S A GREAT POINT, AND SHE HAS NOT YET SAID WHETHER SHE

WILL RUN FOR REELECTION IN 2018, AND THIS IS ANOTHER ALBATROSS ON

HER BACK SO THAT IF SHE DOES RUN, PROBABLY AMONGST DEMOCRATS

IN A PRIMARY, IF SHE GETS PRIMARIED HARD IN CALIFORNIA --

SHE WILL.

IT'S HARD TO PRIMARY DIANNE FEINSTEIN IN CALIFORNIA, I'M

SITTING NEXT TO SOMEONE WHO THINKS IT'S EASIER THAN IT IS,

PROVE ME WRONG, BUT IN PRACTICAL TERMS THE POLITICS, NOW THAT YOU

HAVE A SITTING U.S.

SENATOR WHO MIGHT HAVE TO RUN, SHE WILL HAVE TO TALK ABOUT

THIS AND THAT'S GREAT.

For more infomation >> California Senate Passes Single-Payer Healthcare - Duration: 9:28.

-------------------------------------------

Branson: Paris Exit Cements Donald Trump As Worst President In U.S. History | For The Record | MSNBC - Duration: 5:23.

OF VIRGIN GROUP. NICE TO TALK TO YOU, SIR.

>> NICE TO TALK TO YOU TOO. >> WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE

FACT THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP IS PULLING THE UNITED STATES OUT OF

THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD? >> UH, I THINK IT'S A VERY,

VERY, VERY SAD DECISION, AND IT'S RARE THAT YOU GET EVERY

SINGLE COUNTRY IN THE WORLD COMING TOGETHER TO AGREE ON

SOMETHING. AND THE LAST TIME THIS HAPPENED

WAS WHEN WE HAD CFC GASES AND THE OZONE LAYER WAS THREATENED,

AND OUR YOUNG PEOPLE WERE GETTING CANCERS, AND EVERYBODY

CAME TOGETHER IN CANADA. AND A WONDERFUL AGREEMENT WAS

REACHED, AND AS A RESULT, WE SORTED OUT THAT PROBLEM.

THIS TIME, EVEN MORE COUNTRIES CAME TOGETHER AND WITH ONE

VOICE, EVERYBODY SAID, WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

WE'VE GOT TO GET CARBON NEUTRALITY BY 2050.

MANY, MANY AMERICAN BUSINESSES WERE IN PARIS TALKING TO THE

CHINESE, TALKING TO THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT, TRYING TO PERSUADE

THEM TO SIGN UP. EVERYBODY SIGNED UP, AND IT'S

JUST ONE OF THE MOST DISAPPOINTING THINGS EVER THAT

TRUMP IS GOING TO RENEGE ON AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS A GLOBAL

AGREEMENT AND THAT COULD -- YOU KNOW, COULD SAVE THE WORLD FROM

THE CALAMITY THAT IT WILL FACE IF WE DON'T DO SOMETHING ABOUT

IT. >> WELL, I SUSPECT IF PRESIDENT

TRUMP WERE HERE -- AND BY THE WAY, WE CAN'T GET OUT OF THE

WHITE HOUSE WHETHER HE BELIEVES IN CLIMATE CHANGE OR NOT.

BUT IF HE WERE HERE, HE WOULD SAY THIS, IS THAT HE WAS ELECTED

BY THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, THAT HE WAS ELECTED,

THAT HE WAS ELECTED ON THE CAMPAIGN PROMISE THAT HE WOULD

PULL OUT OF THE AGREEMENT AND THAT HE'D PROBABLY SAY THAT THE

AGREEMENT IS A TREATY AND THAT WHEN IT WAS FIRST SIGNED BY THE

UNITED STATES, IT WASN'T TREATED AS A TREATY, WHICH WOULD HAVE

REQUIRED TWO-THIRDS RATIFICATION BY THE U.S. SENATE, BUT INSTEAD

WAS JUST SIGNED BY PRESIDENT OBAMA.

HAD IT BEEN TREATED AS A TREATY, PRESIDENT TRUMP COULDN'T EVEN DO

WHAT HE'S DOING. SO I THINK THAT'S WHAT HE WOULD

SAY, THAT THIS IS A JOB KILLER IN THE UNITED STATES.

HOW DO YOU ANSWER ALL THAT? >> WELL, THE JOB KILLER IS WHAT

PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS DONE. CLEAN ENERGY CAN CREATE MILLIONS

OF JOBS, AND IT'S ALREADY CREATING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS

OF JOB. CLEAN ENERGY CAN -- I MEAN I'VE

JUST COME BACK FROM ARUBA WHERE AN ORGANIZATION ORGANIZED ONE OF

THE LARGEST SOLAR PARKS IN ARUBA.

AND AS A RESULT, THE PEOPLE OF ARUBA ARE NOW ENJOYING A 15%

REDUCTION IN THEIR FUEL BILLS. AND IT WILL COME DOWN FURTHER.

SO AS FAR AS AMERICANS ARE KERND, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF

JOBS COULD BE CREATED. SOME JOBS LIKE IN COAL COULD BE

REPLACED WITH, YOU KNOW, CLEAN ENERGY JOBS, WHICH ARE MUCH MORE

PLEASANT FOR THE COAL MINERS. AND A REVOLUTION -- NEW

REVOLUTION IN BUSINESS WOULD BE CREATED IN THE STATES.

INSTEAD, A LOT OF THAT WILL GO TO CHINA, TO INDIA, TO EUROPE

AND, YOU KNOW, I JUST FEEL VERY SAD FOR AMERICANS WHO COULD HAVE

BENEFITED ENORMOUSLY. >> YOU KNOW, IN A BIGGER PICTURE

LOOK AT THIS, WHAT DOES IT DO TO THE U.S. STANDING IN THE WORLD?

DOES IT IMPACT IT AT ALL? DO OTHER NATIONS LOOK AT US

DIFFERENTLY, DO YOU THINK, BECAUSE OF THIS OR NOT?

>> OF COURSE THEY DO. I MEAN I THINK THAT -- YEAH.

I MEAN THIS DECISION, I'M AFRAID, ON A GLOBAL BASIS, I

THINK IT'S CEMENTED TRUMP'S POSITION AS PERHAPS THE WORST

AND MOST DANGEROUS PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY, AND IT'S ALSO, I'M

AFRAID, DRAGGED AMERICA TO A NEW, VERY SHAMEFUL LOW.

I THINK THAT WE ALL LOVE AMERICA, AND WE ALL WANT, YOU

KNOW, AMERICA TO SUCCEED. FOR THIS TO HAPPEN MAKES, I

THINK, MANY OF US WANT TO CRY. AND I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT SMALL

BUSINESSES. I'M TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE

BIG OIL COMPANIES. THEY ALL, YOU KNOW, ALMOST WITH

ONE VOICE SIGNED UP FOR THIS. THERE ARE MANY OF THE PEOPLE ARE

ACTUALLY IN TRUMP'S BUSINESS CABINET, AND ONE OF THEM WHO

HASN'T RESIGNED YET WROTE TO ME AND JUST SAID THREE WORDS --

DISAPPOINTING, DISGUSTING, DISASTROUS WAS THE WAY HE SUMMED

IT UP. OTHERS LIKE ELON MUSK AND THE

HEAD OF DISNEY HAVE STEPPED DOWN IN DISAPPOINTMENT AND DISGUST.

IT'S JUST TOO SAD FOR WORDS. THERE ARE OCCASIONS IN LIFE

WHERE YOU NEED THE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA TO BE MORALLY

RESPONSIBLE, NOT MORALLY

For more infomation >> Branson: Paris Exit Cements Donald Trump As Worst President In U.S. History | For The Record | MSNBC - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

US praises PM Modi's call for Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea - Duration: 3:20.

The US today praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's emphasis on having freedom of navigation

and adhering to the international norms for peace and economic growth, amidst China flexing

its muscles in the disputed South China Sea.

Speaking at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue here, US Defence Secretary General (Retd)

James Mattis also said while competition between the US and China was bound to occur, the conflict

between the world's two largest economies was not "inevitable".

"Respecting freedom of navigation and adhering to international norms [are] essential for

peace and economic growth in the inter-linked geography of the Indo-Pacific," Mattis said.

Modi has termed sea lanes passing through the strategic South China Sea as the "main

arteries" of global trade.

He has maintained that India supports freedom of navigation and seeks "utmost respect" for

international law, amid China's muscle flexing in the region.

Outlining India's principled position on the dispute over the South China Sea, Modi in

his address at the 11th East Asia Summit (EAS) in September last year had said "the threat

or use of force" to resolve would complicate matters affecting peace and stability.

China claims sovereignty over all of South China Sea.

Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei and Taiwan have counter claims.

China is engaged in hotly contested territorial disputes in both the South China Sea and the

East China Sea.

Beijing has built up and militarised many of the islands and reefs it controls in the

region.

Both areas are stated to be rich in minerals, oil and other natural resources.

They are also vital to global trade.

Mattis in his speech titled 'The United States and Asia- Pacific Security' also expressed

reservation about Chinese actions that impinge on the interests of the international community.

"We cannot accept Chinese actions that impinge on the interests of the international community,

undermining the rules-based order that has benefited all countries represented here today

including, and especially, China," he told some 500 delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue

which focus on defence and security.

"While competition between the US and China, the world's two largest economies, is bound

to occur, conflict is not inevitable," he said in his speech.

"We seek a constructive, results-oriented relationship with China.

We believe the United States can engage China diplomatically and economically to ensure

our relationship is beneficial - not only to the United States and China - but also

to the region and to the world," Mattis said.

For more infomation >> US praises PM Modi's call for Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

Is the Paris accord unfair to the U.S.? Putting Trump's claims in context - Duration: 7:07.

JUDY WOODRUFF: We return now to the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate

accord.

We want to take a closer look at some of the claims President Trump made during his remarks

in the Rose Garden yesterday.

William Brangham has that.

DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: As president, I can put no other consideration

before the well-being of American citizens.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: In his announcement yesterday, President Trump gave several reasons why he

thought the Paris accord was a bad idea.

The main points the president made was that the Paris accord is unfair to the U.S., that

it would hurt American workers, and that it won't really slow the pace of dangerous climate

change.

So, let's go through some of those claims.

The first thing the president said was, we will get out of Paris, but maybe we will strike

a better deal.

DONALD TRUMP: Begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris accord, or a really entirely

new transaction, on terms that are fair to the United States.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: But leaders from many of the other 195 nations in the deal said there

was no appetite for renegotiation.

French President Emmanuel Macron summed up the view of many.

EMMANUEL MACRON, French President (through translator): He committed an error for the

interests of his country, his people and a mistake for the future of our planet.

We will not renegotiate a less ambitious accord.

There is no way.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: President Trump also implied that the Paris accords are binding on the

United States.

But they're not.

The entire accord relies on voluntary commitments, so many argue that, if the president wanted

to stay in and wanted to change the U.S.' commitment, he's largely free to do so.

Jason Grumet is the president of the Bipartisan Policy Center.

®MD-BO¯JASON GRUMET, President, Bipartisan Policy Center: What was unique about the Paris

accord is that it was essentially a collection of 200 individual promises.

Every country came forward and made a unique commitment.

And each country has the capacity to reassert it own commitments.

So, I think it's entirely reasonable for President Trump to say, I'm uncomfortable with this

aspect of what the United States committed and, therefore, we're going to take a somewhat

different approach.

The U.S. would obviously have much more capacity to influence the choices, views and efforts

of others if we were part of that conversation.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Another one of the main complaints the president made: This will hurt

U.S. jobs.

DONALD TRUMP: Compliance with the terms of the Paris accord and the onerous energy restrictions

it has placed on the United States could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by

2025, according to the National Economic Research Associates.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The international mining giant Peabody Energy applauded the president's

move.

"Peabody believes that this path cannot be followed without substantially impacting the

U.S. economy, increasing electricity costs on families and businesses, and requiring

the power sector to rely on less diverse and more intermittent energy sources."

But others point out that study about lost jobs that the president cited was written

by groups that are opposed to the Paris accords, and that they used some worst-case predictions

that other economists believe are unrealistic.

Asked about this on NBC this morning, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross defended using these

studies.

WILBUR ROSS, U.S. Commerce Secretary: Well, you should know what your downside is.

That's an important thing.

And particularly when you're trying to forecast events many years out into the future, it's

very, very difficult to be accurate.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Roberton Williams is an economist with Resources For the Future, a

nonpartisan group that studied the Paris accord.

ROBERTON WILLIAMS, Resources For the Future: What we have modeled in terms of job effects

is that it's much more of a job shift than it is job loss or net job gain, that jobs

go away in coal, and you get more jobs in some green jobs, renewable energy, small effects

elsewhere.

But there is not a big -- it is not a big drop.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The president also argued that while coal jobs in the U.S. would suffer,

other nations like India and China, the other two major global carbon polluters, would have

a free hand.

DONALD TRUMP: China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of

years, 13.

They can do whatever they want for 13 years.

Not us.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: But Jason Grumet said it wasn't true that other countries can do whatever

they want.

JASON GRUMET: The assertion that the United States fundamentally disabled our economy,

while other countries move forward with absolutely no concern is just not accurate.

I think that the U.S. made some meaningful commitments.

And I think it's perfectly reasonable for President Trump to suggest that we want to

reconsider those commitments.

Renegotiating the United States' commitments is absolutely right.

But it is an exaggeration to suggest that other countries were not sincere or did not

make meaningful commitments.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The president also touched on an issue that is central to the Paris accord,

which is: Can it achieve its stated goal of preventing the planet from warming an additional

two degrees Celsius, or about 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit?

Yesterday, the president said the accord will barely affect global temperatures.

DONALD TRUMP: Even if the Paris agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance

from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a two-tenths of one degree -- think

of that, this much -- Celsius reduction in global temperature by the year 2100, tiny,

tiny amount.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Again, there's a question of where this data comes from, and whether

the president's statement accurately reflects the science.

The White House said the president was citing this study done by researchers at MIT.

But MIT said today the president misused their research.

JOHN REILLY, MIT: The president really took the study out of context by pointing out this

two-tenths of a degree.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: John Reilly is co-author of this MIT report.

JOHN REILLY: This was the incremental effect of Paris compared to the previous accord.

Altogether, if we look at past policy, we think that's reduced warming by a full degree

Celsius.

We still have more we need to do to get to the ultimate goal of two degrees, but Paris

is an important step along that way.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And Roberton Williams argues that even a minor slowing of global warming

can hold off some major destruction.

ROBERTON WILLIAMS: Even small changes in temperature, even small reductions below that what we get

without any action, can make a big difference in how much damage there is to the world.

So, even tenths of a degree can make a difference of hundreds of billions of dollars.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Yesterday, the president said the U.S. will formally withdraw from

the accord.

It's a process that could take several years to complete.

For more infomation >> Is the Paris accord unfair to the U.S.? Putting Trump's claims in context - Duration: 7:07.

-------------------------------------------

WW3 update. U.S. and N.Korea at the brink of war. - Duration: 3:42.

Welcome back this is the latest update in the growing crisis surrounding the

North Korean tensions. North Korea has issued a statement saying that they have

been brought to the brink of war by the latest U.S show force in the region. In

response to King jong-un's latest missile test that fired a short-range

ballistic missile which landed in the Sea of Japan last week the US and Japan

are conducting a series of exercises together. These exercises are an example

of the enormous military might available to president Donald Trump and his allies

should there be a conflict. Made up of two super carriers from the American

Navy the USS Carl Vinson and the USS Ronald Reagan along with their eight

support ships the fleet is joined by two warships from the Japanese Navy

including one of its helicopter carriers. At the same time the Japanese air Self

Defense Force are sending f-15 fighters to train in simulated combat against

American f-18 fighters. This is the first time a joint exercise of this kind has

been conducted between these two countries. The fleet has now reached the

waters of the North Korean coast and exercises will begin immediately.

As for North Korea they have said that if America does not order its military

to leave the region then they have a most powerful nuclear weapon in store

for the U.S. Despite being unable to produce an ICBM or intercontinental

ballistic missile capable of reaching mainland America at the moment many

experts think this could become a reality by 2020 just three years away.

President Trump has vowed that he will never let this happen.

Even so North Korea has shown it is able to launch nuclear attacks against

countries which house US military installations namely South Korea and

Japan with the whole of Japan being vulnerable to a strike. North Korea's

state controlled media has of course issued its usual anti-U.S. rhetoric and

propaganda threatening to reduce America to ashes and vowing complete destruction

should military aggression continue. Outgunned and virtually surrounded and

with heavy UN sanctions in force the chubby dictator is still determined to

pursue his nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Indeed a sixth nuclear test is

expected any day now. Kim jong-un has lately conducted three successful

ballistic missile tests every week over the last three weeks. As the weekend

approaches everyone is wondering if these weekly tests will continue and are

watching the skies and their radar screens for any developments. What the

next days will bring is uncertain but we will bring you the latest updates as

they happen. The world is watching so please be kind to each other.

For more infomation >> WW3 update. U.S. and N.Korea at the brink of war. - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

US Coal Industry's Boom Days Are Gone, Miners Acknowledge | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:55.

FROM THE DEAL DO THAT? ANN THOMPSON IS IN COAL COUNTRY TONIGHT

WITH A REALITY CHECK. >> Reporter: THEY STILL WORK IN A COAL

MINE BUT WITH NO MINING WORK, THEY SERVE AS TOUR GUIDES

IN SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA. >> HOW REALISTIC IS

THIS? >> IT'S A MINE. >> Reporter: WITH

PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DECISION THEY DON'T SEE ANY LIGHT AT THE

END OF THE TUNNEL FOR THE INDUSTRY THEY LOVE.

DOES PULLING OUT OF THE PARIS ACCORDS GIVE YOU HOPE FOR THE

MINING INDUSTRY? >> NO, I -- I HONESTLY THINK MINING IS DONE.

>> THERE IS A LOT OF OTHER STUFF SURROUNDING THE COAL

INDUSTRY THAT WILL BE HARD TO BRING IT BACK. >> WITH FRACKING, GAS,

THERE IS IS TOO MUCH COMPETITION AND WE'RE ON A LOSING END OF IT.

>> Reporter: TODAY COAL IS THE NATION'S NUMBER TWO POWER

SOURCE BEHIND CLEANER NATURAL GAS. JOBS CONTINUE THEIR

LONG DECLINE FROM 255,000 IN 1979 TO JUST 53,000 LAST YEAR.

NOW RENEWABLE ENERGY IS GAINING MARKET SHARE WITH FALLING

PRICES AND STATE SUPPORT. >> THE WORLD IS MOVING

FORWARD ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RENEWABLE'S NO MATTER

WHAT, AND IN THIS COUNTRY, WE'RE SEEING A PRETTY MIRACULOUS

TRANSITION. >> Reporter: TODAY, THERE ARE THREE TIMES

AS MANY JOBS IN WIND AND SOLAR AS COAL. THERE ARE MORE THAN

12,000 COAL MINERS IN WEST VIRGINIA. HERE THEY ARE MORE

OPTIMISTIC. >> IT'S A STEP IN THE

RIGHT DIRECTION. >> Reporter: IN PENNSYLVANIA, THEY

MINE COAL FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS. IT'S A FAMILY

TRADITION. ED IS A FOURTH GENERATION MINOR, TONY

THIRD. WHAT DO YOU SAY WHEN SOMEONE ASKS YOU DOES

COAL HAVE A FUTURE? >> IT'S TOO UNSURE. THERE ARE TOO MANY

FACTORS IN IT.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét