Google Exposed New Evidence Reveals an Extreme Level of Manipulation, Corruption
by Josie Wales
In September of 2011, Google�s Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt testified before Congress
that Google was not manipulating search results to favor its own shopping service (it was).
Schmidt also denied allegations that the company was a monopoly, citing a research paper written
by David Balto, former policy director of the Federal Trade Commission.
What Schmidt neglected to tell the Senate Judiciary antitrust committee was that Google
had funded that research paper.
We're revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.
And that�s not the only one, according to a recently published report by the non-profit,
non-partisan watchdog organization, the Google Transparency Project, which identified �329
research papers published between 2005 and 2017 on public policy matters of interest
to Google that were in some way funded by the company.�
What�s more, the academic research funded by Google covered �a wide range of policy
and legal issues of critical importance to Google�s bottom line, including antitrust,
privacy, net neutrality, search neutrality, patents and copyright.�
GTP�s report reveals a shocking list of sources that Google paid off.
They include:
�[A]cademics, think-tanks, law firms, and economic consultants from some of the leading
law schools and universities in the country, including Stanford, Harvard, MIT, University
of California Berkeley, UCLA, Rutgers, Georgetown, Northwestern Law School, and Columbia.�
Internationally, GTP reports, �Google-funded studies were written by academics at some
of the most prestigious universities in Europe, including Oxford (U.K.), Edinburgh University
(U.K.), Berlin School of Economics (Germany), Heinrich Heine University (Germany), and KU
Leuven (Belgium).�
The Wall Street Journal took their research a bit further, and what they discovered is
astounding.
WSJ reported:
�Some researchers share their papers before publication and let Google give suggestions,
according to thousands of pages of emails obtained by the Journal in public-records
requests of more than a dozen university professors.
The professors don�t always reveal Google�s backing in their research, and few disclosed
the financial ties in subsequent articles on the same or similar topics, the Journal
found.�
University of Illinois law professor Paul Heald neglected to disclose the $18,830 he
received from Google to fund �an idea on copyrights he thought would be useful to Google.�
When he was questioned in an interview about his failure to mention his sponsor, Heald
replied, �Oh, wow.
No, I didn�t.
That�s really bad.
That�s purely oversight.� The professor also claims the money had no influence on
his work.
Google has paid anywhere between $5,000 and $40,000 per paper, and the number of studies
surged the highest in 2012 when the company was being investigated by the Federal Trade
Commission and European regulators for antitrust violations.
At least 50 studies on antitrust issues authored between 2011 and 2013 were bought and paid
for by Google.
According to a former employee and a former Google lobbyist, Google officials in Washington
compiled wish lists of academic papers and then searched for willing authors to complete
the desired work.
Google often provided working titles, abstracts, and budgets for each proposed paper.
Upon completion, they were pitched to government officials.
The former lobbyist told the Journal that Google would �sometimes pay travel expenses
for professors to meet with congressional aides and administration officials.�
Google�s massive influence on academic research should come as no surprise given the former
CEO�s openness in discussing the company�s hand in writing legislation.
At the Washington Ideas Forum, Schmidt described his experience working with the U.S. government,
revealing that �The average American doesn�t realize how much of the laws are written by
lobbyists�and it�s shocking, now, having spent a fair amount of time in the system
� how the system actually works.�
Shocking is an understatement.
It�s absolutely terrifying how the system works.
A multi-billion dollar company with a monopoly on the internet not only writes the laws,
but funds academic studies to shield them from further laws that might prevent them
from becoming even more dangerous, all while harvesting private data from over a billion
people and developing AI technology that allows two neural networks to communicate using inhuman
cryptographic language indecipherable to humans.
And the executive chairman of this disturbingly powerful corporation is a man who has stated
that Google�s famous �Don�t be evil� slogan was �the stupidest rule ever.�
This is the same man who told an audience in Washington, D.C., that �We don�t need
you to type.
We know where you are.
We know where you�ve been.
We can more or less know what you�re thinking about.�
What could go wrong?
For more infomation >> Don't Worry - Bitcoin Will Decline Even MORE - Google Trends Analysis - Duration: 3:26. 
For more infomation >> Google DeepMind - What is DeepMind? how does it work and should we be scared? - Duration: 10:32. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét