- What is going on, guys?
Ryan Nelson here and today we are talking about
the fantastic plastic, the nifty fifty,
the thrifty fifty, whatever you wanna call it,
we're talking about 50mm lenses.
And we've got a few of them here, eight to be exact.
We're gonna take a look at em and see which one
might be the best bang for your buck.
Let's get into it right after this.
I'm not doing an intro, why did I say, right after this?
Anyway, alright, let's just get into it.
Alright, so let's get the basics out of the way first.
I am testing lenses from this 50mm 1.8
which is 47, 48 dollars, just under 50 bucks.
All the way up to the Canon RF, the new lens
for the mirrorless Canons.
Which is 2400 dollars.
So we have quite the variety of lenses here.
So to make this comparison go a little bit simpler,
I've broken these down into two different categories.
We've got the budget 50mm lenses,
which are all the small ones up here,
and then the more expensive, more professional line,
50mm lenses which are the big guys up here,
they're the ones you're gonna spend,
probably around a grand plus for.
Now all of these lenses I did test on the EOS R.
Seven out of the eight were with the Canon EF adapter.
Obviously, I didn't need it for this guy,
but just so you know, this was all shot
with the Canon EOS R.
So a quick run through of
all the lenses we're testing today.
To start off we have the Yongnuo,
I think that's how you pronounce it, I'm not sure,
I'm probably butchering it, so from here on out
this 47 dollar Yongnuo lens I'm just gonna
refer to it as the Yongery lens.
But it's a 50mm 1.8 for Canon EF
weighing in at four and a quarter ounces,
it is the lightest and cheapest lens
we're testing today at 47 dollars.
Up next we have the Canon 1.8 STM lens
weighing in at five point six ounces and 125 dollars.
A lot of people really, really like this lens.
I used it in the past, I didn't like it,
but we're gonna see if it's improved
since I've used it last.
This has been my favorite lens for quite a long time now,
is the Canon 1.4 USM weighing in at 10 and a quarter ounces
at a very reasonable price of 349.
You can frequently find this for just under 300 dollars.
Next up on the list we have a Zeiss 1.4,
which I'm calling the baby Zeiss
because it is the smaller of the two Zeiss
lenses that we're testing.
It's weighing in at 13.4 ounces
and is definitely on the higher end of the budget lenses,
almost straddling that line of pro level lenses at 725.
You can pick these up used for a little bit less than that.
But that is the top end of our budget category.
First in line for the big boys
is the Sigma 1.4 art lens, now we're starting to get
a little bit heavier, this lens is one point seven nine
pounds, it's a bit of a beast.
And you can pick this one up for about 950.
It's under that thousand dollar price range
so it's still not quite like a super expensive lens
but I've heard good things about it.
Next up is the Zeiss Milvus 50 1.4.
I'm gonna say, this is by far,
the heaviest lens in the lineup at just over two pounds.
And you can pick this lens up for about 1200 dollars.
And not to mention, both of these Zeiss lenses
are manual focus only.
So there's a time and a place for that
and we'll see if these tests are
where the time and place is.
So last of the EF lineup we have the 50 1.2L lens.
Now, this has been a popular lens
for quite a long time weighing in at
one point two eight pounds and you can pick
this lens up for around 1300 to 1400 dollars.
And last on the list is the brand new
Canon RF 1.2L series lens.
This thing is actually the heaviest lens.
It doesn't feel like it but
it's weighing in at two point one pounds.
And by far it is the most expensive lens at 2300 dollars.
B&H has it on sale right now for 21.
So, I mean, just hop right over and the steal of a deal.
2100 dollars for this lens.
Granted, I've used this lens before
and it is pretty nice, gotta say.
It's pretty nice lens.
So there's the lineup, let's get into the tests.
Today with these lenses we're not doing
really super scientific kind of tests
with charts and graphs and things like that.
Basically, I just took these lenses downtown,
shot in a variety of different situations.
I wanted to test out a few things.
The chromatic aberration, the fringing on
each one of these, I also wanted to test out
the sharpness down the center of the lenses
and then also on the edges of each lens.
So we've got that test going on.
And then I also did a couple of depth of field
and portrait style tests.
And then came back into the studio
and did a quick controlled lighting scenario.
So let's take a look at all of these
and see which one is the best.
So the first test I did with these,
I wanted to compare the center sharpness
versus the edge sharpness of each of these lenses.
So I did a variety of shots at a
variety of different f stops to compare those all together.
I'm not gonna spend a long time on em right now,
'cause that would take about a half an hour in itself
just to look at all these.
But just to sum this one up,
for center sharpness on the budget lenses
it was kind of a toss up between the Yongery
and the Canon 1.8.
The sharpness on these were very close to each other
so it was really hard to pick a winner in that one.
But if we go to the edge sharpness on em,
I'm gonna say the Yongery wins by a little edge there.
So I'm gonna give it to the Yongery.
Yongery, at 47 dollars, you're doing a great job so far.
Let's keep this going.
Now looking at the higher level lenses,
they're definitely a lot better than the budget lenses,
but overall I think the RF takes this one.
It's holding a lot of detail edge to edge.
It's definitely the best lens of the bunch
but with a little caveat.
The Sigma at less than half the price
is very, very close to the RF lens.
You can definitely see a difference between the two.
It's a very close second.
And for half the price, that's a big deal.
So the second test I wanted to do with this
was kind of a portrait test.
And to keep it fair across the board on all lenses,
I shot em all at F/2.
So on these I used the auto focus to focus on the back eye.
Except for the Zeiss lenses which are manual focus only.
Looking at the first four lenses here,
these are the budget line lenses.
Overall everything is pretty similar.
Some look a little bit softer than others.
But zoomed in, looking at the budget lenses,
I think I missed the focus just slightly on the Zeiss.
But the rest of them caught that back eye pretty good.
I'm gonna give this one to the Canon 1.8.
And here are the four higher end lenses.
A couple of them are pretty sharp,
a couple of them are pretty off.
Once again, I missed the focus on the Zeiss
just by a little bit, literally, almost by a hair.
I guess that would've been me,
because I was focusing it.
If we zoom in it looks like the Canon 1.2 missed the focus
and went just a little bit beyond the eye.
So I missed the focus a little bit.
But it's such a shallow depth of field,
I probably should've opened it up to about 2.8
but lessons learned, you know.
In the Canon RF,
just tack sharp, I mean, dead on with that lens.
Now I'm gonna go with the RF on this one.
Only because it did hit that critical focus point.
The 1.2 EF lens just missed it.
I'm sad to say it did miss it.
I was, I really had high hopes for that lens.
But you missed the focus, man, come on.
You missed the focus, RF has it, it's,
it's going to the RF.
Looking at the two finalists here.
We've got the Canon 1.8 and the Canon RF.
Just for fun, we're gonna zoom in quite a bit on these.
You can see that 1.8 actually pretty sharp on both eyes.
The eyelashes are sharp, the eyebrows are sharp,
the eyes are mostly sharp and then looking over at the RF.
That back eye is just tack sharp and that falloff is just,
slight and gradual, very pleasing, very nice lens.
The next test is a depth of field test.
So each one of these lenses is wide open.
1.8, 1.4, 1.2, whatever the widest that lens can do
that's what we were shooting at.
So taking a look at the budget lenses here.
Everything's pretty similar.
There's a little bit of falloff.
There's lots of shapes, lots of hard lines going on here
so I think this really gives you a good idea
of what the bokeh falloff, focus falloff,
depth of field, whatever you wanna call it.
It really gives you a good idea of what each lens is doing.
Now some of these lenses when we zoom in,
it almost looks like there's double vision.
Especially on this pole, where it mounts to the building.
It almost looks like you're seeing double.
And then the big thing I noticed with these
No Parking signs in the background here,
with all the straight lines and then the circles.
Some of them started to get a little kind of dizzying.
And then way in the back, from the dark and the lights,
I was seeing a little bit of fringing
with some green showing up in several of these lenses.
Overall, I think the Yongery 1.8 looks pretty nice.
Especially, once again, for 47 dollars.
This lens is, which one is it, this one.
Once again, this lens is 47 dollars.
47.
You can buy em by the case full and just
toss em around if you want.
I'm not going to 'cause I still need to use it.
Moving on to the higher end lenses here.
You can definitely tell that
these are more expensive lenses.
More technology has gone into these.
That falloff, that depth of field rolloff is
really, really nice.
We're not, so much, getting the dizzying circles
and straight lines from those No Parking signs.
We're not really seeing the double vision on,
where that pole mounts to the building.
We're noticing the No Parking signs
probably most on the Canon 1.2L lens, the EF lens.
Once again, the RF lens is just so creamy
and buttery and just so smooth and soft.
Where that focus falls off.
I hate to say it, but I'm gonna have to give it to the
RF again, why does this lens have to be so expensive?
But the Sigma lens is right on the heels of the RF.
Good job, Sigma.
Looking at the two finalists in this one,
we have the cheapest lens at 47 dollars
and the most expensive lens at 2400 dollars.
Is there that much difference in these two?
Yes, there is, but, are you gonna
get that much value out of it.
As the focus falls off you can definitely see
that the RF is so creamy smooth versus the Yongery lens.
Man, is there that much value in that?
If you can really afford the RF
and you need it, you're getting paid to do
really, really high end work, once again,
yeah, buy that lens but for 47 dollars,
look at what you're getting.
At 1.2 versus 1.8, that sharpness falloff,
there's definitely a difference side by side.
But if you look at one and five minutes later
you look at the other,
I'm gonna guess that you're probably
not gonna notice a difference.
Especially if you're just the casual observer
or the casual shooter.
I gotta say, I'm pretty impressed with this Yongery lens.
For 47, I know, I keep saying it.
It's 47 dollars, I'm just, 47 dollars
and you can get like a really good 50mm lens.
I'm not gonna say it's really good
because it's plastic and things move around
and shake.
I don't know how long that thing's gonna last
but for the price to value to quality ratio,
I think it's doing pretty good.
Alright, we're getting there, I promise.
We got a few more tests to look at.
I have all these lenses here I just wanted
to make sure I covered everything.
Kind of went into depth and
I'm not even gonna cover everything
'cause there's no much you can do.
You can cover it, you can test with these lenses.
I've just, trying to pick the things
that maybe matter the most or are
the most noticeable for quality.
So the next test we're looking at is
kind of a chromatic aberration, fringing test.
And with this test, these were all shot at F/2.
So I found this spot with lots of highlights
and shadows, really contrasting colors
right next to each other.
Let's take a look at the budget lenses here.
Looking at these is an overall,
not seeing much differences in overall.
And this seems to be kind of a
reoccurring theme with a lot of these.
If you're just looking at it as a whole,
you don't notice that much difference.
It's when you start getting into the details
that you're seeing the differences in these lenses.
So in this scene the most fringing that I noticed
was on the front of this truck.
You're definitely seeing it a lot more in some lenses
rather than other lenses.
It is very noticeable with the Canon 1.8.
Not so much on the 1.4 which actually surprised me
because the last time I tested with this lens,
that fringing was quite noticeable.
But overall I'm gonna give this one to the Canon 1.4.
Moving on to the bigger lenses, once again,
as an overall, we're not seeing a whole lot of difference.
You're seeing things that are a little bit crisper
than the budget lenses but once again,
we'll zoom into that truck front.
And see the differences in each lens here.
Most of them are holding up really well.
Surprisingly, the RF has a little bit of fringing there.
The 1.2 is holding up really good.
Although, we do get some red.
The Zeiss actually looks kind of soft.
I think I may have misfocused with this one again.
Once again, manual focus, I don't know.
Just not doing it for me, I guess.
And then on the Sigma, the Sigma actually
looks really, really good, there's zero fringing here.
The colors are holding really well.
Once again, looking around zoomed in,
we're seeing little differences here and there.
But overall, I'm gonna give this one to the Sigma.
It finally beat the RF, it's been right on the heels.
Right on the heels of the RF
and the Sigma just finally pulled ahead.
It's like that horse or the freakin' race you're watching,
you're just like, come on, come on,
you're right there, you can do it, you can do it.
And then it just noses ahead and you're like,
yeah, we got this, baby, we got this.
So looking at the two finalists here,
we've got the Canon 1.4 and the Sigma 1.4.
Zoomed in, the Sigma's definitely the better one.
It's kinda holding detail, it's not,
it's not getting real soft where these lights are
in the dark shadows of the parking garage.
And it's holding up really well.
So I have to say, that Sigma lens
is looking pretty darn good right now.
I've never really been a fan of them in the past,
but this one might be changing my mind.
So the last round of testing I did
outside with these was autofocus speed.
So on the portrait I racked the focus all the way out,
flipped the autofocus switch and just
kind of tested that timing of how long it took
to get that portrait into focus.
Then I kind of did the reverse with the long shot.
Where I racked focus all the way in
to see how long it would take to get
the focus on a far object.
And surprisingly, the two most expensive lenses on here
were pretty comparable to the budget lenses.
I was not expecting that.
But the clear winner on this one was the Sigma.
That focus was just, bam, just lightning fast.
It was on it, in focus, and done,
and it had it, and I'm, once again,
highly impressed with this Sigma lens.
So the last test I wanted to do with all these
was come back into the studio, do a controlled
lighting setup on a solid tripod, same lights.
These were all shot at F/2.8.
Now looking at these on the monitor,
I gotta say, they're all really, really close to each other.
On my first shot with Canon 1.2L series,
unfortunately, once again, it did
just miss focus by a little fraction.
Now, I don't know if it's problem with this particular lens
or if it's a common problem throughout
that series of lenses, I'm not sure.
But overall, these are looking fairly similar.
There are slight variations
in the focal length of each lens.
And looking at all these side by side, next to each other,
one after the other, I honestly can't tell you
which one I like the most.
They all did pretty good.
So why don't you let me know down in the comments
which one you think wins in the studio.
I know that was a lot to cover,
I know that was a lot of ground
and a lot of comparisons and a lot of things to look at
and sometimes your eyes can just glaze over
as you're looking at all this stuff.
So what I'm gonna do below is drop a link
to where you guys can download all my sample images.
So download that, take a look at it.
Let me know what you think was the best lens
out of all of these.
My preference, okay, if I had all the money in the world
I would buy this lens, but I don't,
so I've gotta send it back.
No matter which one of these lenses you get,
you're gonna get some quality.
You're gonna have some pluses, you're gonna
have some minuses, that's anything you buy.
In most situations, if you're just posting
Instagram and Facebook, and just doing those for fun,
any of these lenses will do.
If you're doing studio work that's where I
can see either the Zeiss lenses coming in
a little more handy if you need that super critical focus.
And you have the time to work with it?
That's gonna be a really good lens.
Because this lens gives you a long
range to find that just to fine tune that focus point.
Where you need that focus to be.
But, once again, you need the time to do that.
So if you don't have the time to sit there
and do manual focus all the time,
I would suggest not getting either of the Zeiss lenses.
Although, definitely quality lenses.
But not my favorites.
That being said, my budget preference,
I would say, would be the Yongery lens.
I'm gonna try to pronounce this one more time.
The Yongnuo, I think it's the Yongnuo.
Anyway, that would be my preference.
Especially for the price of that thing.
If you drop it, if you scratch it,
if you lose it in a river,
it was 47 dollars, okay, I'll just go buy another one.
You're still ahead of buying this Canon 1.8.
And you're getting a very, very similar quality.
I'm not gonna say similar build.
If you want a slightly beefier plastic lens,
spend a hundred or whatever, a hundred and ten dollars
on this guy, but I'm gonna say,
just go ahead and get the Yongery lens.
It's cheap, you're not gonna have to worry about it.
If you scratch it, eh, go buy another one.
Or use it for a fun lens.
But if you wanna spend some actual,
real hard earned, good money on a lens,
my recommendation is gonna be go with the Sigma.
I was actually highly impressed with this lens.
Like I said, I've used Sigma before in the past.
They've never really been my favorite lenses
especially compared to Canon brand lenses.
But this thing was very impressive.
Now this is the first lens I've ever used
out of the art lens series.
A lot of people rave about that series of lenses.
I'm gonna be no exception with that,
this thing value for quality.
The Sigma is definitely gonna be the way to go.
And I was actually kind of disappointed
with this Canon 1.2 L series lens.
I've used several L series lenses in the past,
they've always been quality, very sharp,
head on, just tack on the nail,
whatever you wanna call it, sharp.
But I don't know, I'm gonna do a little bit
more testing with this before I send it back.
See if maybe I just didn't get the hang of using it.
But I think, at this point, I know how to use a lens.
Not to be braggy or anything, but,
I think I know how to use a lens? I'm not sure.
Alright, guys, before I go, and if you were wondering,
Ryan, how did you afford all of these lenses?
I didn't afford them all, I just rented them all.
Well, all except for two.
I bought this Yongery lens for 47 dollars,
so that one's mine, I can do what I want with it.
I can throw it around, I can take it out,
I can shoot, it's actually a pretty good lens.
I liked it, I liked it quite a bit.
And then I already had the Canon 1.4 lens.
But the rest of these lenses I rented from
BorrowLenses.com.
I've rented some gear from them in the past,
not sponsored by them in any way,
I'm just, they've been really good to me
and they've given me great customer service
so I just want to plug them real quick.
BorrowLenses.com,
I'm gonna link them down below.
Check them out if you wanna rent some gear,
rent one of these lenses for themselves.
Also I'm gonna link down to Amazon for each of these lenses.
If you wanna just straight up buy one for yourself.
Check it out, that's where I got this Yongery lens.
Amazon, two days, 47 bucks, free shipping,
no questions asked, it was a good deal.
Anyway, I really do appreciate it, guys.
If you liked this video, hit that thumbs up button
down there, hit that subscribe button
if you wanna see more and I will see you guys next time.
One last thing before I sign off today,
I want to give a huge thank you to Eric
who helped me out with shooting these videos
and help me keep all these lenses straight
and all these test shots.
So, made sure we paired the right test shot
up with the right lens, so Eric, thank you so much for that.
I'll link his channel up here
so go ahead and check his channel out.
Subscribe if you haven't and I will see you guys next time.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét