Thứ Năm, 28 tháng 9, 2017

Youtube daily how Sep 28 2017

Namaste friends welcome back to Sangeeta's Kreations. If you're new here please make

sure to subscribe my channel for latest updates and hit double button for

notifications. The Indian festival of Diwali also referred to as a festival of

lights Diwali is quickly approaching

so here I come with five beautiful Newspaper Diyas

for making this Diwali more special just you need few materials and your

imaginations. Take newspaper and fold it this way and cut it with cutter. Place

barbecue stick at the end of the newspaper

corner and then roll it at the end apply small amount of glue and roll it twist

it and take it out now roll the tube this way on barbecue stick keep rolling

now here apply glue and insert another tube into it keep on rolling at the end

apply glue paste it and attach cloth pin make two of same size now take

another tube and roll it on any bigger object apply glue and roll it this way

at the end again apply glue and take it out slowly so now you have to round

coils with the same size and one big round coil we are going to make this way

so it's ready to start take one round coil

slowly push from the center with thumb and make the shape as shown apply hot glue

and paste this way

now take glue plus water with proportion to 2:1 and apply all over it and let

it dry color it as per to your choice now for the second diya take tube and

roll it this way as shown apply glue and paste it take it out so for this diya

we will be needing two round coil of same size and one big round coil and one

small round paste them as shown

apply a blue coat and later color as per to your choice now for 3rd diya for this you

will need 2 small round coil and 1 big round take one small coil and make the

shape as shown now same with second round coil attached them as shown an

apply glue and color it as per to your likes for fourth Diya style you need 4

round coil of the same size make shape as shown

apply hot glue and paste it make shape with remaining round coil apply glue in

this center and paste a thin piece of paper as shown and attach it as shown

apply coat of glue and later when it dry color it as you like now for the fifth

dia you will be needing seven small coil one medium size and two little bigger

size same way make shape for both the coil now attach all small coil as shown

take tube and roll it all over as shown

now attach them apply coat of glue after it dry apply color as per to your choice

so all your Diyas are ready isn't it looking beautiful light your home with

this five-diyas decoration ideas this Diwali hope this video was very helpful

please give a big thumbs up and do comment below

happy Diwali and do let me know what would you love to watch in my coming

videos thank you for watching see you soon till then namaste

For more infomation >> How to make newspaper diya stand - Diwali Special - DIY - Sangeetas Kreations - Duration: 6:17.

-------------------------------------------

How To make money in college - Duration: 5:09.

How to make extra money in college

Whats good wealthbulderz its yah boy DeVaughn back again with another

video and today we are talking about

how to make extra money

in college

When your a college student things can really suck

Your eating bullshit all day

Your professors could be a drab and your parents aren't really the most

financially savvy people So its not like your in college with a silver

spoon in your mouth

Welcome to the real world player This is what 95% of people are going throuugh

while in college But why are they?

It seems to me while being in college or being of college age

Your life could be so much easier if you just stepped out your comfort zone

And did something about your finances.

I know I make it sound easy with a vauge statement like that

but its really that easy.

The thing is I'm not going to just give you some empty inspirational

thought on how your college life sucks and you can make it better.

I want to actually show you how to make it better

with making more then just extra money in college

Cause extra money in college is like getting some bullshit

part time job at Fed ex... no disrespect to my college students doing this

but this is not going to really put you on the road to financial security

I'm going Show you how you can really make extra money in college

without selling your soul Or asking your parents to take out a 2nd mortgage

just to finance this business.

Its a very simple method Click the link below to find out more.

Its my FREE Ebook The Wealhbuilderz Six Figure Formula

To Making Money Online In this book

I break down how you can use social media sites like this one

and make more money then you can think of all online.

I literally give you a blueprint to success online

which will in turn create time freedom for you

to be able to do your college thing without having

to worry so much about money

Also subscribe to my youtube channel and like this video.

Do remember Wealthbuilderz Make More

Save More Build More

make extra cash college, earn extra money college,

make money college, part time jobs college,

money making ideas college students, how to make extra money online,

ways to make money in college, how to make extra money fast,

For more infomation >> How To make money in college - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

How To Use Flying Machine Clash Royale (503) 606-6201 Discord Call ILEICES#2238 - Duration: 2:14:32.

For more infomation >> How To Use Flying Machine Clash Royale (503) 606-6201 Discord Call ILEICES#2238 - Duration: 2:14:32.

-------------------------------------------

Professor John Curtice - How has Brexit reshaped British politics? - Duration: 3:25.

For more infomation >> Professor John Curtice - How has Brexit reshaped British politics? - Duration: 3:25.

-------------------------------------------

Ashley Black Guru explains how to FasciaBlast "cellulite" (Subtítulos en español) - Duration: 3:35.

For more infomation >> Ashley Black Guru explains how to FasciaBlast "cellulite" (Subtítulos en español) - Duration: 3:35.

-------------------------------------------

How To Play Megalovania On Piano EASY Piano Tutorial Synthesia SLOW Undertale Songs - Duration: 12:24.

How To Play Megalovania On Piano EASY Piano Tutorial Synthesia SLOW Undertale Songs

Welcome to The Ruby Piano, your home for

your home for easy piano tutorials. I'm Kay

and in today's video we're going to learn how to play

Megalovania on the piano EASY from video game Undertale Roblox.

We're going to focus on the introduction.

I'm going to show you an easy way to play it, and if it's easy for you you can add some extra stuff to it

and I'll show you that too.

but you don't have to add anything your ready to do. Ok? First I'm going to show you how it goes.

And just really quick I'm going to show you an add on. If we double the left hand it sounds really cool.

Again, you don't have to learn it this way. I just wanted to show you what it sounded like.

So that's what it sounds like if you add a little more to it and make if faster.

which you don't have to do because right now we're going to learn how to do it super easy.

I'm going to show you how to do it. The right hand does most of the melody.

But if it's kind of hard for you to shift back and forth like that you can kind of cheat and use the left hand

you don't have to. If it's easy for you or harder for you I'm going to let you pick

what you want to do. Whatever's best for you is great for me.

First off we're going to number our fingers because it makes it easier for me to teach. One, Two, three, four, and five.

And left hand one, two, three, four, and five.

So we're going to go finger One, thumb D and finger five is going to his this D.

So it's going to go D D D A.

and like putting finger Four on that A right there.

So let's try that out we're going to do D D D A

Ready? Ready and go.

D D D A

Ready and go D D D A

Do it again

So this happens every single time so get super used to that. Then you're going to take

this finger, number 4 and you're going to put it on A flat

So this is A. This is Aflat. You're going to focus on the middle black key so

if I say, "Black" you're aiming for this black key

Ok? So we're going to go 4, 3, 2

and then 1 is going to be on D

4, 3, 2, 1

Let's try that out. Ready and go

4 3 2 1

Try it again

4 3 2 1

Ready and go

4 3 2 1 2 3 Do it again

4 3 2 1 2 3

Let's do this several times because this happens every time.

Ready and go 4 3 2 1 2 3

Do it again

Do it again

Good! So that's the firrst little chuck. Let's try it out we're going to go D D D

Ready? Ready and go

D D D A

Black 3 2 1 2 3

Good! Let's do it one more time.

Ready and go

D D D 4

4 3 2 1 2 3

Good! So what's going to happen now is your thumb goes down in this little pattern

So first it's going to do D, and then it's going to go C

and then it's going to go B

and that's B so that makes this black on B flat

Black B flat

and so each time your thumb walks down

to the black note

Ok? That's also the left hand part if we add the left hand

over here, which you do not have to do.

So if it's easier for you, you can let your left hand

play this

For more infomation >> How To Play Megalovania On Piano EASY Piano Tutorial Synthesia SLOW Undertale Songs - Duration: 12:24.

-------------------------------------------

How To Drawing Cars 3 Bob Sterling Coloring Pages For Kids How To Painting Bob Sterling Funny - Duration: 12:00.

How To Drawing Cars 3 Bob Sterling Coloring Pages For Kids How To Painting Bob Sterling Funny

For more infomation >> How To Drawing Cars 3 Bob Sterling Coloring Pages For Kids How To Painting Bob Sterling Funny - Duration: 12:00.

-------------------------------------------

The Physics of Sound How and Why Sound Heals - Duration: 15:14.

The Physics of Sound: How and Why Sound Heals

The following is excerpted from The Humming Effect: Sound Healing for Health and Happiness

by Jonathan Goldman and Andi Goldman.

An examination of the majority of spiritual paths and religions on this planet reveals

an overriding belief that sound was the primary force of creation.

Examples of this come from the Old Testament (�And God said, �Let there be Light��)

and the New Testament (�In the beginning was the Word�).

It comes from many other traditions � Egyptian, Hopi, Mayan, Polynesian, and more � which

all have creation myths that invoke the power of sound.

It is said in the Hindu spiritual path that �Nada Brahman� � everything is sound.

A female voice mandala made visible by a CymaScope

Even from a Western scientific perspective, we talk about the �Big Bang,� signifying

that the creation of the universe was somehow sonic in origin.

Modern scientists, like our ancient mystics, tell us that everything is in a state of vibration,

from the electrons moving around the nucleus of an atom to planets in distant galaxies

spinning around their suns.

From the very tiny to the very large, everything vibrates.

As many of our modern physicists understand, energy and matter are interrelated.

Thus, if all forms of energy are putting out a vibration, all that energy can be considered

sound, whether we can hear it or not.

Frequency

Sound is energy that travels as a wave.

The wave enters our ears and travels through our auditory pathways into our brain, ultimately

affecting our breathing, heart rate, and nervous system.

We experience this wavelike energy primarily as a phenomenon that we hear.

However, these waves also pass into our body, affecting us on a cellular level.

Sounds are measured in cycles per second, or frequency, as measured in hertz (Hz).

Slow-moving waves of sound create deep tones.

A sound with a frequency of 60 Hz, for example, is very bassy and low.

A sound with fast waves, such as 1,000 cycles per second, would be a relatively trebly and

high-pitched.

The lowest note on a piano has a frequency of about 24 Hz, and the highest note is around

5,000 Hz.

Our range of hearing extends from around 16 Hz to around 16,000 Hz (or sometimes higher

� young children, for example, can hear upwards of 18,000 Hz or more).

However, just because we can�t hear something doesn�t mean a sound isn�t being created.

As an example, our friends in the ocean, the dolphins, can project and receive frequencies

upwards of 180,000 Hz � that�s more than ten times our best range of hearing.

Sounds with a frequency below the human level of hearing are called infrasound; sounds with

a frequency above the human level of hearing are called ultrasound.

Resonance

Knowing that all matter vibrates, we can move on to explore the idea that every object � including

every organ, bone, and tissue in our body � has resonance, or a natural vibratory

state.

There�s been much speculation on how to determine the natural frequencies of a healthy

organ.

Some find that they are within the audible sonic range (between 16 Hz and 16,000 Hz).

Others find that they fall well below this audible range or, like ultrasound, far above

it.

When the body is healthy and balanced, these vibrations are in harmony with each other.

When the body is imbalanced, it is in a state of dissonance � the resonant qualities of

its constituent parts are in disharmony.

One of the most extraordinary demonstrations of the effects of sound and resonance was

conducted by a visionary Swiss doctor named Hans Jenny.

Dr. Jenny�s seminal work titled Cymatics (a Greek word that means �wave form�),

whose first volume was published in 1967, showed the effects that sound waves have upon

different types of material, including water, pastes, and other liquids.

Dr. Jenny placed these substances on a steel plate and vibrated the plate with a crystal

oscillator, which produced an exact frequency, and then he photographed the effects.

He photographed liquid plastic (a material similar to Silly Putty) that formed into an

object resembling a sea anemone, and lycopodium dust (a material similar to talcum powder)

that took on shapes resembling the cells of the body.

Some of his most amazing photos were of water, which took on astonishing geometric forms,

depending upon the vibrational frequency that was used.

Dr. Jenny�s work demonstrates the extraordinary power of vibration � that is, sound � to

create form.

While the structures and forms he created with sound were not living creatures, many

of them certainly look as though they were.

You can almost imagine that, with a �divine� sound coming from a sacred source, in the

beginning the Word could indeed create life.

What is equally important with regard to Dr. Jenny�s experiments is that the effects

are repeatable.

If you take the same substance and expose it to the same frequency that Dr. Jenny used,

you will get the same result.

This consistent structuring � a certain vibration leads to a certain form � is a

manifestation of resonance.

If the vibration changes, the structure changes in concert with it.

Several people have carried on Dr. Jenny�s work in the twenty-first century, including

Alexander Lauterwasser of Germany and John Stuart Reid of England.

The following are two photos taken by Reid showing the beautiful geometric forms that

water took on when vibrated by two diverse frequencies on a CymaScope, a device similar

to Dr. Jenny�s.

When you think about the fact that the human body is mostly made of water, it�s easy

to realize how powerful the effects of sound can be upon us.

The voice of author Jonathan Goldman rendered as a visual pattern by a CymaScope

Let�s now examine two different (almost diametrically opposed) ways in which sound

can be used for healing.

Both involve the concept of resonance.

How Sound Can Heal: Method One

For this first method of healing with sound, let�s visualize a healthy body like an orchestra

that is playing all together in balance and harmony.

Let�s call this music the �symphony of the self.�

Using this metaphor of the body as an orchestra, what happens when the second violin player

loses his sheet music?

Pretty soon that violin player might begin to play the wrong notes and the wrong rhythm.

Usually, in a very short amount of time, the rest of the string section begins to sound

off.

In fact, as this dissonance develops, you�ll begin to notice that there�s something wrong

with the entire orchestra.

It just doesn�t sound right.

This is akin to a part of our body vibrating out of its healthy -resonance�it�s vibrating

out of tune and out of ease, and we then say that this part of our body is diseased (dis-eased).

One of the basic principles of using sound as a healing modality is to restore the part

of the body that is diseased back into a state of healthy resonance.

It is very much like getting the sheet music back to that string player.

It seems appropriate at this time to honor Dr. Peter Guy Manners, one of Jonathan�s

mentors and one of the great pioneers in the field of sound therapy.

Dr. Manners passed away at the turn of this century, but he had been engaged in the research

and practice of sound healing since the 1950s.

His work focused on finding the correct frequencies to restore healthy resonance to different

parts of the body for different conditions.

He created the �Cymatic Instrument� (now known by other names), which had the ability

to project over six hundred different combinations of frequencies (which he called �commutations�)

in order to strengthen an imbalanced portion of our anatomy.

Due to some legal issues, his work (and his instrument) was not as well known at the time

as it perhaps could have been.

However, today trained practitioners in the field of sound healing readily employ numerous

devices based upon the work of Dr. Manners, with remarkable healing benefit.

Although we have been introduced to many different types of instruments designed for sound healing,

our preferred instrument is one that doesn�t require electricity or batteries, has an owner�s

manual that�s really simple to use, and is free.

This instrument is, of course, our own voice.

And it�s what we�ve been teaching for dozens of years.

Please note: we are not talking about using the voice in a musical fashion such as singing�that�s

entertainment.

We�re not talking about getting up in front of an audience and singing �Strangers in

the Night� or whatever song turns you on.

Here, in relation to sound specifically utilized for healing, we�re talking about the concept

of entrainment.

The term entrainment comes from physics, and it describes the way in which the vibrations

of one object can affect the vibrations of another object.

Through entrainment, we can synchronize or harmonize one vibration with another.

For example, we can use our own voice to vocalize a tone through humming that can entrain vibrations

in other parts of our bodies, bringing them into a state of balance.

There are many ways to use entrainment for sound healing.

At a basic level, you can use vibration � humming � to restore the natural resonance of an

organ or system.

When an organ begins to vibrate out of its natural frequency, its energy becomes blocked.

The organ then becomes vulnerable to potential imbalances � deterioration, disease, viruses,

bacteria, and so on.

When we reinforce its natural frequency, the organ�s resonance is restored, it regains

its energy, the intruder energy that was causing damage ceases to exist, and the organ is restored

to health.

You might also use different rhythms to influence bodily pulses, such as our heartbeat, respiration,

and brainwaves.

Or you can use sounds that are slightly out of tune, called �beat frequencies,� which

can be applied in a specific manner to influence brain waves.

We will discuss some of these uses of entrainment later in this book.

How Sound Can Heal: Method Two

With this second method, sound is used in an opposite manner.

Instead of focusing on the organ and reinforcing its healthy, natural vibratory state, this

method focuses on the intruder � that pathogen or energy that is causing harm to the organ.

You can find videos of people shattering wine glasses with their voices on YouTube.

Even such reputable shows as the Discovery Channel�s MythBusters have recorded the

phenomenon.

When a singer is able to match the resonance of the wine glass with his or her voice with

great amplitude (volume), the glass begins to vibrate and ultimately shatters.

This ability of sound to disintegrate matter has been known for a long time.

Remember the story of Joshua and the walls of Jericho in the Old Testament?

Joshua and his men blew horns and gave a great shout and the walls crumbled.

With sufficient amplitude, sound is powerful enough to cause any object to shatter when

its resonant frequency matches that of the object.

This second approach to sound healing focuses on using sound to disintegrate whatever pathogen,

malignancy, or energy is causing harm to the body.

In the early 1930s, a scientist named Royal Rife invented an instrument that was said

to be able to shatter cancer cells and their pathogenic precursors (he believed that all

cancers were caused by bacteria and/or viruses) with high-frequency vibrations.

He developed a microscope that allowed him to observe these pathogens, and then he worked

with high-frequency vibrations to find the correct frequencies for destroying them.

Whether his treatment of those with cancer still holds true or not, his work with high-frequency

sound was incredible.

Recently, we were sent a link to a video for a TEDx Talk by Professor Anthony Holland,

a musician-scientist at Skidmore College, discussing his work shattering cancer cells

and bacteria with high-frequency vibrations.

Among other things, the video has some astonishing visuals of this phenomenon occurring.* It

truly demonstrates the power of sound to heal.

Many of us are familiar with the use of high-frequency sound, called ultrasound, to construct images

of babies in utero.

These ultrasonic frequencies are also often used to disintegrate kidney stones.

The possibilities don�t stop there.

For example, Jeff Elias, M.D., of the University of Virginia�s medical school is using ultrasound

to treat Parkinson-like tremors.

We first heard of his work on the national nightly news.

Dr. Elias was treating an elderly woman with such bad shaking from tremors that she could

not write her name with any sort of legibility.

Using an fMRI to view her brain, Dr. Elias trained a beam of highly focused sound energy

on the area of the brain where damage had occurred.

The procedure lasted less than a minute.

About ten minutes later, the woman was asked to sign her name, and her script was lovely

and legible.

Any surgery to address the woman�s tremors would have been extensive, and recovery would

have taken close to six months.

In contrast, the ultrasound treatment was brief and noninvasive, and the woman�s recovery

time was almost instantaneous.

It was astonishing.

The reporter covering the story asked Dr. Elias what other conditions might be treated

with sound.

He suggested that there were many different possibilities.

What is perhaps most significant about the work of Professor Holland and Dr. Elias is

that it has been filmed, which vividly validates the power of sound to heal and transform.

For more infomation >> The Physics of Sound How and Why Sound Heals - Duration: 15:14.

-------------------------------------------

How to Download Paid Apps for free on iPhone ( without any jailbreak or PC needed) 2017 - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> How to Download Paid Apps for free on iPhone ( without any jailbreak or PC needed) 2017 - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

How to replace feed rollers scanner/document feeder in xerox machine. - Duration: 3:19.

hey what's up guys my name is razak and I'm back with another exciting video in

this session we're going to talk about some of the common problems that cause a

paper jam in document feeder which is single pass document handler we call it

simply SPDH I will also show you how to replace an nudger roller a retard

roller and feed roller which comes in place each time and you scan a

document handler you can also clean these rollers with moist cotton cloth

slightly damp and water

so I'll simply show you how to remove this one in an easy way you can remove

it by yourself I'll put the part number link in the description so you can order

online from Xerox directly using that link so you just grab and grab it like

that and then just pull it towards the left

hand side get it out from the rollers which are holding them up you can just

be careful pull it out it's a spring there you go pull it out inside while

removing so these are the rollers you can replace and even you can anyone you

can clean it with a moist cloth a cotton cloth like that so this is how you can

put it back again just just follow the procedure in a reverse form just lightly

push it into the position that it was before and press it should be

that's it

please like and subscribe if you find it really helpful and you can

comment in below to let me know what you need a service on so I'll make a

follow-up video because I don't have much videos in my repository I'm slowly

trying to build up the repository and once I have repaired all the machine

parts then you can search for right now you can comment and you can pass your

messages comment all those kind of things and I

will make a follow-up video for you this will be very helpful as I am just

beginning to make these videos and if you like my channel do subscribe so I'll

be glad and I'll be presenting most of the series to you so this is me

Razak once again see you in the next session

For more infomation >> How to replace feed rollers scanner/document feeder in xerox machine. - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

How to Draw a Cute Pumpkin ♥ Halloween Drawings - Duration: 1:46.

in this video, I'll teach you to paint a pumpkin

For more infomation >> How to Draw a Cute Pumpkin ♥ Halloween Drawings - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

How to mine Decred - Using Windows CPU ( CPUminer ) - Duration: 4:34.

Decred - How to mine decred on Windows(CPU)

This video will demonstrate how to create an account at suprnova pool and how to mine decred using the CPU of a computer running Windows.

Follow me on steemit: @Virtualcoin

Open your browser, access the suprnova website and create a new account.(Link in the description)

Download the software: CPUMINER

Create a folder called C:\Miner and extract the CPUMINER package in this folder.

Open the notepad and create a batch script called start.bat, here is the script command:

REMEMBER to replace my account virtualcoin.decred for your account and password.

For more infomation >> How to mine Decred - Using Windows CPU ( CPUminer ) - Duration: 4:34.

-------------------------------------------

How to create cardboard and shopping bag wall hanging diy wall decor | diy decor | Creative Diy Art - Duration: 11:11.

How to create cardboard and shopping bag wall hanging diy wall decor | diy decor | Creative Diy Art

How to create cardboard and shopping bag wall hanging diy wall decor | diy decor | Creative Diy Art

How to create cardboard and shopping bag wall hanging diy wall decor | diy decor | Creative Diy Art

For more infomation >> How to create cardboard and shopping bag wall hanging diy wall decor | diy decor | Creative Diy Art - Duration: 11:11.

-------------------------------------------

How to Create a Profile Picture Frame Campaign in Facebook 2017/create facebook frame officeially/ - Duration: 6:05.

Solution Express20

Solution Express20

For more infomation >> How to Create a Profile Picture Frame Campaign in Facebook 2017/create facebook frame officeially/ - Duration: 6:05.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Methods For Skin Whitening With Potato | How To Get Fair Skin At Home With Potato - Duration: 3:33.

THIS VIDEO IS ABOUT Skin Whitening TODAY I WILL TELL YOU Skin Whitening Home Remedies AND how to get fair skin at home I WILL ALSO TELL YOU HOW TO whiten skin naturally T HROUGH THIS METHOD whiten your skin THROUGH THIS METHOD YOU WILL KNOW how to get

white skin YOU WILL ALSO KNOW how to get fair skin TODAY I WILL TELL YOU fair skin tips AND beauty tips TODAY I WILL TELL YOU HOW TO MAKE A skin whitening mask THIS VIDEO IS ALSO ABOUT Skin whitening treatment YOU CAN LEARN skin

lightening METHODS IN THIS VIDEO THIS VIDEO IS ABOUT permanent skin whitening POTATO METHOD YOU CAN whiten your skin permanently BY potato skin whitening METHOD IN THIS VIDEO I WILL TELL YOU HOW

TO MAKE A potato face mask YourHealth YOU WILL KNOW HOW TO DO potato facial USING potato face mask AND peel off mask HOW WILL KNOW how to facial AND HOW TO skin care AND HOW TO DO at home facial FINALLY I WILL TELL YOU white skin tips

For more infomation >> Top 10 Methods For Skin Whitening With Potato | How To Get Fair Skin At Home With Potato - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

How to install vray 3.6 for 3ds max 2015 - 2018 | Cài vray 3.6 cho 3dmax 2015 | All Windows - Duration: 8:17.

Link download Vray 3.6 below description of Video

Before installing, Please exit all App of Autodesk

Please like and Subcribe channel! Thanks you!

For more infomation >> How to install vray 3.6 for 3ds max 2015 - 2018 | Cài vray 3.6 cho 3dmax 2015 | All Windows - Duration: 8:17.

-------------------------------------------

How to make a robot | Windmill power bot | Tutorial to make a windmill robot - Duration: 16:11.

Don't forget to subscribe our channel for more videos!

Don't forget to subscribe our channel for more videos!

For more infomation >> How to make a robot | Windmill power bot | Tutorial to make a windmill robot - Duration: 16:11.

-------------------------------------------

How to Catch A Cheater - Pokemon Edition - Duration: 2:59.

MOOOO

For more infomation >> How to Catch A Cheater - Pokemon Edition - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

Ryan school murder: Accused Ashok showed CBI how he killed Pradyuman Thakur, sources say - Duration: 3:33.

Ryan school murder: Accused Ashok showed CBI how he killed Pradyuman Thakur, sources say

A CBI team today brought Pradyuman Thakur's alleged murderer, 42-year-old bus conductor Ashok Kumar, to Ryan International School. Sources in the agency said Ashok recreated the entire crime scene inside the bathroom.

A seven-member team of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has reconstructed the crime scene in the Pradyuman murder case.

The investigative team brought the alleged murderer, 42-year-old bus conductor Ashok Kumar, and a gardener, Harpal, to Ryan International School, where the murder took place.

CBI sources said Ashok recreated the entire crime scene inside the bathroom.

The central agency took over the investigation of Pradyuman's murder on Friday, after the ML Khattar-led Haryana government asked it to. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ajay Kumar Bassi (CBI) leads the team.

Pradyuman was brutally killed on September 8. His father wants that date to be Students' Safety Day.

HOW WAS ASHOK KILLED? The CBI team travelled to Ryan International School today - their second visit in two days - to gather more evidence in the case.

Ashok was taken inside the bathroom where he allegedly killed Pradyuman. The CBI officers asked Ashok to say where and how he was standing, and where Pradyuman was when he was murdered.

The CBI also made Ashok re-enact the killing. Top sources in CBI told India Today that this recreation of the murder scene will help the agency authenticate and verify Ashok's claims.

The investigative agency also noted down the escape route Ashok took.

On Saturday, 12 CBI officers spent the entire day at Ryan International. CBI sources said the team, comprised of forensic experts, collected additional evidence from the crime scene that would be crucial during further investigation.

The central agency has registered a case of murder under Section 302 (murder) of the IPC, 25 of the Arms Act, 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act read with section 34 of IPC.

WHAT IS THE CBI LOOKING FOR? Haryana Police have alleged that Ashok Kumar killed Pradyuman with a knife after the child resisted an attempt to sexually assault him. However, the post-mortem report ruled out any sexual assault attempt by the accused.

Pradyuman's father Varun Chand Thakur is suspicious of the police's theory, and believes there's more to it. Varun Thakur suspects the school administration was trying to manipulate evidence and destroy clues.

CCTV FOOTAGE TO BE RE-EXAMINED The CBI will re-examine all CCTV footage recovered from Ryan International School, to uncover more clues. One camera recorded Pradyuman and Ashok on the day of the murder.

Meanwhile, a three-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) has pointed out severe security lapses in the daily management and functioning of Ryan International School.

For more infomation >> Ryan school murder: Accused Ashok showed CBI how he killed Pradyuman Thakur, sources say - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

HOW MONSANTO GENETICALLY MODIFIES OUR FOOD COMPARED TO WHAT HAPP - Duration: 19:37.

HOW MONSANTO GENETICALLY MODIFIES OUR FOOD COMPARED TO WHAT HAPPENS NATURALLY IN NATURE

Are you concerned about Genetically Modified Foods? Here�s (GMOs Revealed) a great documentary

that addresses many of the questions and concerns most people have today.

In March 2014, scientists from Indiana University announced that they had conducted research

to examine the operations of the fruit fly genome �in greater detail than ever before

possible� and had identified �thousands of new genes, transcripts and proteins.�

Their results indicated that the fly�s genome is �far more complex than previously suspected

and suggests that the same will be true of the genomes of other higher organisms.�

Of the approximately 1,500 new genes that were discovered, 536 of them were found within

areas that were previously assumed to be gene-free zones. Furthermore, when the flies were subjected

to stresses, small changes in expression level at thousands of genes occurred, and four newly

modelled genes were expressed altogether differently.

Why is this important? Because it reveals how little we know about this planet and the

organisms dwelling on it, yet also how much we think we know. This kind of hubris is found

within all areas of human knowledge, but particularly when it comes to science.

Another great example that I�ve used before is when the populace first realized that the

Earth wasn�t flat. Another is a statement made by physicist Lord Kelvin, who stated

in 1900 that �there is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains

is more and more precise measurement.� This assertion was shattered only five years later

when Einstein published his paper on special relativity.

When it comes to our genes, and the genes of other organisms, we really do know next

to nothing. Unfortunately, proponents of the biotech industry (Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta,

etc.) claim otherwise, and have developed multiple, flawed assumptions that undergird

agricultural bioengineering.

The information presented in this article comes from a variety of different sources,

but my primary sourceis Steven Druker, a public interest attorney and the Executive Director

of the Alliance for Bio-Integrity. He initiated a lawsuit in 1998 that forced the U.S. Food

and Drug (FDA) to release its files on genetically engineered foods, and recently published a

book about it, which has received dozens of rave reviews from the world�s most accredited

scientists in the field. I draw primarily from his book for this article.

�This incisive and insightful book is truly outstanding. Not only is it well reasoned

and scientifically solid, it�s a pleasure to read � and a must-read. Through its masterful

marshalling of facts, it dispels the cloud of disinformation that has misled people into

believing that GE foods have been adequately tested and don�t entail abnormal risk.�

� David Schubert, PhD, molecular biologist and Head of Cellular Neurobiology, Salk Institute

for Biological Studies.

Natural Genetic Modification Versus Human Induced Genetic Modification

Biotech proponents have an unshakable faith in their GE crops, and these corporations

also hold major sway over mainstream media outlets, and close relationships with government

agencies like the FDA. Indeed, several high level industry employees have also held positions

at these institutions. One example is the FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods, Michael

Taylor, who is also Monsanto�s former Vice President for Public Policy. While at the

FDA, he was instrumental in getting approval for Monsanto�s genetically engineered bovine

growth hormone.

Druker outlines in his book how the commercialization of genetically engineered foods was enabled

by the fraudulent behaviour of these government agencies, and how this actually violates explicit

mandates for federal food safety law. The evidence shows that the �FDA�s falsehoods

have been abundantly supplemented with falsehoods disseminated by eminent scientists and scientific

institutions, and the entire GE food venture.�

This is why it�s so amazing to see so many scientists within the field supporting the

dissemination of truth, and bringing the falsehoods to light. So if you still think this type

of thing is a conspiracy theory, we now have the documents as well as the science, which

stands on its own, to show that something is terribly wrong here.

Joseph Cummins, Ph.D. and Professor Emeritus of Genetics at Western University in London,

Ontario, believes that Druker�s book is a �landmark� and that �it should be

required reading in every university biology course.�

There are several presumptions on which the bioengineering venture was based, and one

of them is that natural breeding is more random and unruly than bioengineering. The standard

argument holds that genetic modification has been occurring for thousands of years, and

what we do now is simply that process sped up and made better.

Key Presumptions on Which the Bioengineering Venture Was Based

Genetic engineering is based on the presumption that the genome is just a linear system, where

the action of a single gene will not impact the action of other genes, or disrupt their

normal function.

In 2007, the New York Times published an article outlining how �the presumption that genes

operate independently has been institutionalized since 1976, when the first biotech company

was founded. In fact, it is the economic and regulatory foundation on which the entire

biotechnology industry is built.�

Basically, genes are viewed as autonomous, adding to the whole without acting holistically

because they don�t express their proteins in a closely coordinated matter. Another assumption

used to justify genetic engineering is that genes aren�t organized in a specific way,

that the sequence in which they occur is meaningless From this point of view, a gene would function

normally if it were relocated to a different chromosome or came from a neighbouring gene.

Quite a big assumption, don�t you think? Giorgio Bernardi, a biologist at the University

of Rome III who specialized in the study of genome evolution, calls this perspective a

�bean-bag view of the genome� because it regards the genes as �randomly distributed.�

Druker explains:

Together, these two assumptions supported the belief that a chunk of recombinant DNA

could be put into a plan�s genome without inducing disturbance � because if the behavior

of the native genes was largely uncoordinated and their arrangement was irrelevant, there

would be no important patterns that could be perturbed by such insertions. Accordingly,

they engendered confidence in the precision of genetic engineering, because they implied

that the outcome of a gene insertion would be exactly what the bioengineers expected.

How could biotech proponents push the idea that the target organism would continue to

function just as it had before, and that the change would be limited to the new trait endowed

by the inserted gene? How can it simply be assumed that this would not alter any of the

organism�s other qualities?

These presumptions still underly genetic engineering today. The example of the fly above serves

well here. In the New York Times article cited earlier, the author noted that �genes appear

to operate in a complex network,� and states that �evidence of a networked genome shatters

the scientific basis for virtually every official risk assessment of today�s commercial biotech

products, from genetically engineered crops to pharmaceuticals.�

Molecular geneticist Michael Antoniou, who testified at New Zealand�s Royal Commission

in 2001, notes that agricultural bioengineering �was based on the understanding of genetics

we had 15 years ago, about genes being isolated little units that work independently of each

other.� He also presented evidence showing that genes actually �work as an integrated

whole of families.�

Despite the grave possibility that these presumptions are indeed wrong, they still form the backbone

of genetic engineering today.

Antoniou himself was even selected to represent multiple nongovernmental organizations to

present precaution reasons to the UK�s GM Review Panel, and a plethora of studies that

clearly justify it. Despite his presentation, and many others�, the 11 other scientists

on the panel, who were biotech proponents, dismissed these studies and continued to argue

that it makes absolutely no difference how genes are arranged.

How can a scientist make such a statement?

What do we have as a result? As Druker says:

Such disregard, denial, or avoidance in regard to the evidence was essential for maintaining

faith in the venture, because its predictability and safety have always relied on the genome

being largely disjointed; and the more the genome instead appears to function as a tightly

coordinated system, the more potentially disruptive and unpredictable are the interventions of

the bioengineers.

Geneticist, activist, and environmentalist David Suzuki weighed in on this very subject

a few years ago in an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC):

By slipping it into our food without our knowledge, without any indication that there are genetically

modified organisms in our food, we are now unwittingly part of a massive experiment.

. . . Essentially, the FDA has said that genetically modified organisms, or food, are basically

not much different from regular food, and so they�ll be treated in the same way. The

problem is this: Geneticists follow the inheritance of genes, in what we call a vertical fashion

. . . [but] what biotechnology allows us to do is to take this organism, and move it,

what we call horizontally, into a totally unrelated species. Now, David Suzuki doesn�t

normally mate with a carrot plant and exchange genes. What biotechnology allows us to do

is to switch genes from one to the other, without regard for the biological constraints.

. . . It�s very very bad science. We assume that the principals governing the inheritance

of genes vertically applies when you move genes laterally or horizontally. There�s

absolutely no reason to make that conclusion.

More Differences

This is a common argument made by GE-food proponents, and commonly used whenever an

expert brings up a challenge to the technology�s safety. For example, David Schubert, PhD,

a molecular biologist and the Head of Cellular Neurobiology at the Salk Institute for Biological

Studies, commented in Nature Biotechnology that there was mounting evidence that the

insertion of even one gene into a cell�s DNA alters the expression patters of genes

throughout the entire cell. He said facts like this one, among many others, �cast

doubt on the soundness of agricultural bioengineering � and entail the conclusion that it �is

not a safe option.� �

Predictably, when a professor and a laboratory director of one of the world�s most prestigious

scientific institutions makes a comment like this, there�s going to be a response. This

time it came in the form of a letter, published by 18 biologists at respected universities

and institutions, stating that Dr. Schubert failed to properly consider �the genetic

realities.� The main reality he allegedly failed to recognize is that the natural method

of plant breeding is inherently more random than bioengineering.

A portion of the letter reads as following:

We do not take issue with Schubert�s basic contention that unintended genetic and metabolic

events can take place. The reality is that �unintentional consequences� are much

more likely to occur in nature than in biotechnology because nature relies on the unintentional

consequences of blind random genetic mutation and rearrangement to produce adaptive phenotypic

results, whereas GM technology employs precise, specific, and rationally designed genetic

modification toward a specific engineering goal.

In his book, Steven Druker offers the following counterargument: �This letter thus reveals

how strongly the GE food venture relies on the presumption that the natural process driving

biological development are intrinsically more disorderly and risk-bearing than the genetic

interventions instigated by the human mind. And it confirms that this belief forms the

ideological bedrock on which the venture rests.�

In fact, a report published in 2004 by the National Academy of Sciences couldn�t uphold

�even the more modest notion that bioengineering and natural breeding pose the same risks.�

The panel that produced the report ranked various modes of plant breeding in terms of

their disposition to produce unintended effects. They were forced to acknowledge that bioengineering

produces far greater effects than pollen-based sexual reproduction. Despite this fact, they

still insisted that this does not mean a difference in risks.

Druker says in response:

Thus, there�s no rational way to reconcile the fact that natural breeding is less disruptive

and more predictable than bioengineering with the claim that it poses equal or greater risk,

which is why the admission in the 2004 report is a rarity � and why biotech proponents

almost always ignore or deny that fact and instead assert that natural breeding is more

disorderly and unpredictable.

Randomness

According to the biotech industry, natural plant breeding could actually result in crops

that are dangerous to human consumption, which is why we should be grateful for genetic engineering.

For example, in the same NAS report mentioned above, they portrayed what are known as �jumping

genes� as more randomly mobile and threatening, but failed to recognize, as Druker points

out, that although these entities do not pose risks within natural pollen based breeding,

when bioengineering is employed they do because that process alone �tends to stir them up

and get them jumping.�

When it comes to sexual reproduction, it�s yet another area where biotech proponents

state that it�s a random phenomenon, despite the fact that we now know that it�s not

random, and that there are multiple factors that can and do influence the genetics of

life. Genetic engineering, be it human induced or naturally occurring, requires a genetic

�rearragnement,� a recombination of DNA. The difference between the artificial way

and the natural way is that the natural way does not disrupt the entire organism, as was

discussed a little earlier in the article and touched upon in the Suzuki quote above.

As Druker explains:

This natural form of recombination occurs during the formation of gametes (the sperm

and egg cells). It includes a step called crossover in which two partner chromosomes

break at corresponding points and then exchange complementary sections of DNA; and every time

a gamete is produced, every set of paired chromosomes engages in it. In this way, all

the chromosomes end up with genes from both parents instead of from only one. However,

all the genes are preserved, as is the sequences in which they�re positioned. The only changes

are in the relationships between aleles. . . . So this natural recombination augments diversity

while maintaining stability. And without it, except for the occasional favorable mutation,

the composition of chromosomes would stay the same from generation to generation, and

genetic diversity would grow at far too sluggish a pace.

He goes on to mention how natural recombination preserves the order of the genes, and is predictable

in the way it cuts DNA. The entire process displays a great deal of order.

Despite this fact, scientists who support GE state, as in, for example, the 2004 NAS

report, that �genetic engineering methods are considered by some to be more precise

than conventional breeding methods because only known and precisely characterized genes

are transferred.� They use the idea that the randomness and unpredictability of natural

engineering make bioengineering safer.

Yet, as Druker so brilliantly captures:

This misleading tactic fixates on the predictability of the plant�s specific agronomic traits;

and it portrays traditional breeding as less predictable than bioengineering because undesired

attributes are often transferred along with the one that is desired. However, those who

employ this ploy don�t acknowledge that if both parents are safe to eat, the unwanted

traits hardly ever pose risk to human health. Rather, they�re undesirable for reasons

irrelevant to risk (such as aesthetic appearance or seed size), and breeders must then perform

back-crossing to eliminate them while retaining the trait they want. However, although the

inclusion of unwanted traits entails more work, it does not increase attendant risks.

Therefore, while breeders can�t fully predict what traits will appear, they can confidently

predict that the resulting plant will be safe to eat.

This is why the GE stance on natural modification is so flawed and misleading.

Druker goes on:

Although it describes the sexual reproduction of food-yielding plants as a messy and risky

affair that involves the transfer of �thousands of unknown genes with unknown function,�

we actually know quite a lot about those genes. And what we know is far more important than

what we don�t know. We know that they�re all where they�re supposed to be, and that

they�re arranged in an orderly fashion. And we know that during the essential process

in which some of them are traded between partnered chromosomes in order to promote the diversity

that strengthens the species, their orderly arrangement is marvelously maintained. Most

important, we know that their functions mesh to form an exquisitely efficient system that

generates and sustains a plant that regularly provides us with wholesome food.

This sharply contrasts with genetic engineering.

As you can see, comparing natural modification to biotech modification is not an easy process,

and this isn�t even the tip of the iceberg. Research shows that it�s not natural modification

that�s more random and risky, but biotech genetic modification:

The inserted cassettes are haphazardly wedged into the cell�s DNA, they create unpredictable

disruptions at the site of insertion, the overall process induces hundreds of mutations

throughout the DNA molecule, the activity of the inserted cassettes can create multiple

imbalances, and the resultant plant cannot be deemed safe without undergoing a battery

of rigorous tests that has yet to be applied to any engineered crop.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét