Youtube daily we Sep 8 2017

Adaptations have been a big topic and target this year and thats not new. They haven't

exactly been fan favorites in the past. At their best their received moderately with

an "this ok I guess but I rather watch or play the original" & at their worst they're

abominations that don't even deserve to know the sweet release of death…. Or y'know…

just not being watched or played more than once. So yeah adaptations are dumb and fans

are almost certain to hate them. But, they're not really for the fans. Here's why.

Everybody hates the Netflix Death Note adaptation. Well, that's not necessarily true. There's

a fair amount of people that liked, or at the very least didn't mind it. Those people

aren't giant Death Note fans to begin with and therefore lack major expectations. Ignorance

is bliss as it were. Some people know the name but never watched the original and the

adaptation sparks their interests. Those are the people these sorts of things are made

for and I think it's ok to target those people. That's 1 reason why I think it's

irrational to hate them. Consider a different form of adaptations, reboots. Teen Titans

GO comes to mind and is the most obvious example of what I'm getting at. Fans of the original

Teen Titans HATE that show and talk about how it is dumb and it's missing the point

of the original. They just fill the show with dumb jokes and leave out all of the substance,

action, and stakes from the original. WHERE'S THE RAVEN TRIGON ARC!?? But, it's clear

that was intentional. They didn't aim to translate that show 1 to 1 for a new generation.

They wanted to take bits from that show that would work well for that new generation. The

joke in Teen Titans Go aren't THAT foreign in the context of the original animated show,

that's what they decided to

Or in the video game world, games like Metroid Prime: Federation Force. Any merits that game

has on its own don't matter because it's not Metroid. METROID IS ABOUT SOLITUDE! NOT

TEAMWORK! WE WANT A METROID GAME! OR to point the mirror at myself for a bit Mario + Rabbids

Kingdom Battle. It may have Mario in it. But, it's not a Mario game in more ways than

the gameplay. Like I touched on in my last video (plug plug.) Thing is. none of those

things are aiming to have the same point. There for different audiences. Sure, they

expect existing fans to tune in based on the brand recognition but the main goal of adaptions

is to win over NEW fans. Obviously the franchises as they already existed didn't win EVERYBODY

over so why use the same formula.

Like, Metroid. Those games don't sell. People like things that originate from the series

just fine in the Smash Bros games, but, the Metroid games as they are don't exactly

set the world on fire in regards to sells. Certainly not in the way the love for characters

like Samus and Ridley would lead people to believe. Why not take the part that IS widely

loved, the brand itself, and try to find success for that thing on a different playing field?

& I know the characters in Federation Force aren't the same but the character of Samus

didn't matter a whole lot for her appeal in Smash. Many didn't know she was a woman

until Super Smash Bros Brawl when Zero Suit Samus was introduced. The cool thing about

Metroid was the bad ass armor and weapons. Well, that part is represented in full with

Federation Force. Only difference is you're not Samus and you can play with friends. WHICH

I know is polarizing because like I said jokingly, Metroid really is about solitude, but, not

every game needs to be this super canon you play Samus and you do A B and C until Z. The

Metroid world is big enough to include more bounty hunters than just Samus. After all,

the game isn't called Samus: Path to Loneliness. It's called Metroid. Are Metroids in the

game? K cool. It checks out. & don't get me wrong, it's valid to see themes in a

franchise and begin to love and expect those themes to persist but if the theme isn't

core to the world than there's room to introduce new ones. Meaning, Metroid's lore isn't

that Samus is the last existing bounty hunter so why SHOULDN'T they be allowed to experiment?

Sometimes their aim is to meet somewhere in the middle like the Ghost in the Shell live

action film that released this year. A major point of contention was the casting of Scarlett

Johansson as Ghost in the Shell's protagonist, Major. This is obviously in part because of

a different problem that exists in film being that the big movie studios don't cast very

many actors that are minorities and whatnot which is fair, they don't, but if they wanted

this movie to appease more than fans of the franchise, what other options did they have?

The rationale they have for this particular casting decision makes sense to me in this

regard. Now in a movie based on a giant IP I think it's fair to expect that casting

is more worried about accuracy than it is about the fame of the actors they cast. Ghost

in the Shell doesn't fit the bill, BUT in order to fulfill the vision the creators had

they needed it too do well. How do you do that? Sell the masses on what they know. An

A list actress. Now, the fact that there ARE no A List Asian actresses I 100% agree with

being a problem, but, Ghost in the Shell isn't the movie that would rectify that. Again,

you need a big brand to make big actors. Ghost in the Shell isn't that. That casting isn't

what's wrong with that movie. Nerdwriter1 has a really good video on it's problems

which I'll link in the card on the top right. Check it out after this!

So let's come back to Death Note. Some would argue that it does a poor job at translating

the anime to film and that the themes aren't consistent and characters like Ryuk aren't

in character because seemingly different motives and goals or that Light/Kira isn't a big

enough self aggrandized jerk to make his character interesting or that L is black.

All of those criticisms acknowledge the Netflix Death Note film is inherently different and

in the mind of die hard fans "different" inherently is "bad." Which, given the aim can be true.

But differences alone aren't bad. Even in the realm of adaptations. If the difference

serves as a tool for artistic expression I say go for it. Especially if it's done in

a way that's received well by a fair amount of people that have seen it. The Death Note

anime & manga are about what happens when a frankly crazy man develops a heavy handed

definition of justice and thereby peace and because of those "unique" ideals & the new

found power he wilds, he's the only one worthy self important enough to believe he and only

he can accomplish and how that clashes with L & his idea of justice. The Netflix adaptation

is really in stark contrast with that. It's a new take on that world & Light's view of

the world. This, I think, is a bit more grounded, it's human. He struggles with being Kira he

doesn't magically transform into this unfeeling God-like or whatever. In the movie Light wasn't

necessarily burdened by the state of the world. He kinda just accepts the whole of it minus

things that directly affect him. He doesn't start to be this symbol of "justice" until

he gets the nudge from Misa, who again, I find to be more grounded in some ways at least.

Why would this ditsy model fall in love with someone based on their knack for killing people?

The Netflix Misa is cunning unfeeling and devious. A compliment to Light's conscience.

She pushes the story forward. Giving a role beyond that girl that loves the anti hero.

& beyond this the movie leaves room for more which could further flesh out this version

of the world. That's what a lot of the Netflix film seems to want to do. Re-contextualize

some characters & in some ways ground them in reality & yes Americanize them. Which,

is fine. Anime versions of shows like Powerpuff Girls are fine with fans of Powerpuff Girls,

why can't Death Note fans accept a new take on what they love in the same way?

I do wanna stress that I'm not trying to tell you to love adaptations, because on the

whole, they're usually uninspired and cash grabby. Even some of the examples I talked

about are guilty of that. I think Netflix's Death Note is different. I think that film

was what happens when a fan gets a hold of a franchise they like with the opportunity

to make changes. What would you do in the situation? To be clear I'm not telling you

to love that either. My only point is that differences aren't what make adaptations bad.

They're not always meant for fans & just super good at making that clear.

But those are MY thoughts what do YOU think? Do you like any changes made in an unpopular

adaptation or reboot? Or do you think they're all terrible & should never exist ever? Let

me know in the comments! If you like this video share it with a friend that also has

something to say about adaptations or reboots. Good or bad. I wanna talk to'm... or her.

WATCH MORE ACTION POINT here's a playlist on the left. On the right have a special video

YouTube knows you'll absolutely love. Also, subscribe and click the bell for even more

videos like this and those every Tuesday & Thursday @ 4pm est. ok, that's it for me. See you next

week.

For more infomation >> Netflix's Death Note: Adaptations Are Stupid & So Are We for Hating Them - Duration: 9:08.

-------------------------------------------

We Got A Free Massage !! Trialbike Session In Baden Baden - Duration: 3:33.

Can you pleas send me the video

Or can you send to Domi (Dominik Oswald)

Domi is such a loser at hookups

Hahahahhahahaha

He really sucks at the last world cup

Do you hear that Domi?

Im really disappointed :D

*creepy sound*

puta (whore)

nice

yeah

let it roll

now..

you got it, YOU GOT IT !!

*burp*

I´m fucked up

*brake sound*

Its really awesome. I like that!

Thank you

a coupon from "Bio Nouvelle" for an relaxation treatment

Crazy

Its really cool what you´re doing

Please call us and make an appointment

Its right here, around the corner

nice

For more infomation >> We Got A Free Massage !! Trialbike Session In Baden Baden - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Gray Scott: Should We be Cautious about Envisioning Dystopias? - Duration: 1:54.

We will get what we expect. And I mean that literally, what we expect:

Meaning, what we write, what we create, what we think about, what we focus on. When you start to think about

manifesting the future, when you start thinking about writing about the future, a lot of the science fiction stories that we have from the past

actually become self-fulfilling prophecies. So a lot of the technologies that we have they are based off of Gene Roddenberry's work with Star Trek.

Literally, people saw those things and they they wanted to try to manifest those products.

If I'm writing about the future I'm also

responsible for what I put out there, right? Because I'm influencing your psychology. I'm influencing your narrative, your story.

I mean Isaac Asimov, Arthur C Clarke,

Gene Roddenberry: Part of what I took from all of these futurists that came before me is

they, I think, were very aware of

how the world was influencing them and their work,

and

they were aware of how their work was going to influence people in the future.

So, there have been times when I thought: I shouldn't talk about certain things or I shouldn't write about certain things, just because

There is a morbid fascination with Dystopia. I love cyberpunk.

At heart I'm sort of a cyberpunk fan. I love Blade Runner.

But that is not the world you want to live in. I mean, blade Runner is not the future we want.

So there's there's got to be some

new narrative that we haven't talked about yet.

you

For more infomation >> Gray Scott: Should We be Cautious about Envisioning Dystopias? - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

How Do We Stop Hate Speech? - The Action Report - Duration: 13:44.

Welcome to the Action Report. We break down the big, hairy problems the news and tell you what you

can do to actually fix them. Today, we're going to be discussing hate speech, and

whether or not it has a place in our society. Bare with me though because

first we've gotta break this down. First of all, what do we mean by hate speech?

The American Bar Association defines hate speech as "speech that offends,

threatens, or insults groups based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual

orientation, disability, or other traits." If I called all Republicans

subhumans that deserve to be exterminated, then that would be hate

speech because it targets a shared trait among a group of awful people. This

should not be confused with hateful rhetoric and of the peculiarities of an

individual. For example, if called Taylor Swift a manipulative robot built by

Hollywood to capitalize on the sentiments of empowered white women, then

that would not be hate speech because it's not targeting Taylor Swift for belonging

to a particular group. She, individually, is just the worst. In countries around

the world, certain types of hate speech are

constricted by law. In Belgium, Holocaust denial is illegal, and in most of Europe

for that matter. In Germany, it is not permissible to defame certain segments

of the population. In Chile, it is against the law to discriminate on the basis of

gender, religion, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, appearance, or handicap.

In the United States, however, prevailing norms around freedom speech make the

passage of hate speech legislation a near impossibility. With a few important

caveats that we will be exploring later, the United States government refuses to

abridge anyone's speech, even that of white supremacists and Nazis. We are

going to be covering why our country is so uniquely resistant to this idea, and

whether or not they have a point. And after that I promise we'll get to the

things that you can do. Just hang in there!

The reason the United States is so darn insistent that most forms of

speech be permitted unabated can be pretty much boiled down to one word -

freedom, or more specifically, freedom of speech. The First Amendment of the US

Constitution prohibits "...abridging the freedom of speech."And while many

countries around the world enjoy freedom of speech. in the USofA. we interpret

it quite literally. In a recent unanimous Supreme Court ruling, the court struck

down an attempt by the federal government to regulate disparaging

speech because they believed such regulation went against the very spirit

of the First Amendment. Justice Samuel Alito asserts: "...speech the demeans on the

basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar

ground is hateful, but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that

we protect the freedom to express the 'thoughts that we hate'." Now proponents of

this interpretation do freely admit that the First Amendment does come with some

limitations. In general, threats harassment, and incitement to violence

are not considered protected speech, but these, they argue, are always narrowly

tailored towards preventing individual harm. If our definition of unprotected

speech were ever widened beyond harassment, threats, and incitement to

violence, they caution, then the very sanctity of our democracy would be at

risk. In that very same Supreme Court ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy

argues: "a law that can be directed against

speech found offensive to some portion of the public, can be turned against

minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all." At the heart of the

hate speech debate is an appeal to the slippery slope argument, which is the

claim that if you let "A" happen, which in this case is hate speech legislation, then

some terrible, hypothetical, totalitarian "Z" will befall America. The slippery

slope argument? Now where have I heard that before? START OF CLIP: if marriage is a human invention, then

different types of marriage could have equal value. If humans invented

marriage then polygamy (the taking of several wives), polyandry (the sharing

of a wife by several husbands) END OF CLIP That's right F@ckers pull this argument out

whenever they don't want things to change. The herd of sheep I'm married to

thank you, by the way. The issue with this line of reasoning is that evidence

(and by that I mean actual data not just someone's train of thought) is rarely

provided to explain how we get from point "A" (hate speech legislation) to "Z"

(our complete and utter descent into a repressive regime). Now I'm not saying

that hate speech legislation is above manipulation. Let's be clear - all laws can

be manipulated for unseemly purposes. In Rwanda, for example, a law designed to

halt the spread of genocidal ideology prevents people from publicly identifying

as the ethnic Hutu or Tutsi minority. A law that Rwandan president and dictator

Paul Kagame has used to lock up political opponents. But as we listed n the beginning of

this video, there are plenty of healthy democracies with hate speech legislation.

In Norway, public statements of hate speech are illegal, but according to The

Economist Intelligence Unit Norway ranks as more democratic than the

United States. which itself was downgraded in the ranking to a flawed

democracy just last year. The problem with this debate is that we often aren't

talking about actual specifics, but only principles. Principles that we aren't

bothering to adapt to our evolving understanding of biology and human

psychology. Words have an impact on individuals, and our refusal to judge

them is having real-life consequences. For one, it allows people to pretend as

though their biases don't exist, and obscures their responsibility to address them.

While the content of speech in the United States is allegedly untouched by

lawmakers, politicians are allowed to place content neutral restrictions on

speech all the time. You're probably familiar with many of these. Noise

ordinances that constrain loud noises to certain times. Limitations on the amount

of people that can gather in a certain place without a permit. These time, place,

and manner restrictions are used all the time to

restrict your speech. The line between content-neutral and

content-based restrictions, however, is very blurred. It always has been, and

politicians biases constantly come into play. Take, for example, the 2012 Honoring

America's Veterans Act that, in part, was passed in response to protests of

veteran funerals done by the Westboro Baptist Church. The Westboro Baptist

Church, by the way, has been designated an anti-gay hate group by the Southern

Poverty Law Center. The law increased the distance all protesters could protest

during said funerals. Like it or not, a value judgment was made here to protect

the rights of a specific political identity - in this case veterans. I'm not

necessarily saying that anything's wrong with that, but it is hypocritical to

protect the rights of some groups and not others under the banner of

objectivity. This type of double standard has always existed, and it usually

impacts the most vulnerable. In many localities, for example, people are barred

from giving the homeless food, and aggressive panhandling is illegal. Are

these restrictions truly content-neutral or are we simply respecting the rights

of the more privileged to not feel guilty? I think we all know the answer to

that question is the latter. From using health regulations to prevent same-sex

marriage to voter ID laws to suppress minority turnout, oppressors have always

assumed that their biases are an innate fact of life. In a system such as

ours, addressing systemic inequalities becomes that much harder when you allow

your oppressors to operate under the banner of neutrality. Another problem

with our society's resistance to hate speech is that it ignores the effect

abusive words can have on an individual's psyche. Stress pervades our lives, and

while it is true that there is tolerable, and even good stress, there's also toxic stress

that can lead to adverse health outcomes. When we don't have the resources to handle

stressful situations, our bodies can become mentally and physically ill. What

I mean by resources is that chemicals in our body, specifically cortisol and

adrenaline, help us to adapt to difficult situations, allowing our bodies to

return to normal when the stressful situation subsides. But if the situation

doesn't subside, then these periods of long-simmering stress have been known to

lead to bad health outcomes. Long periods of stress, even ones with no physical

contact, can correlate to reduce life expectancy, chronic illnesses, and altered

brain chemistry. In essence, stress kills. These harms correlate unsurprisingly

with marginalized identity groups such as racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual

minorities. You can therefore make the case that when you allow people to say

abusive language towards said minorities you are causing harm. Your

words - drumroll please as the conservative internet

loses its collective shits - cause violence. Yep you heard it here. The use of

language is violence. Come at me brawhs. To be clear, this is not an argument

to censor all uncomfortable language. There's certainly a value in debating

viewpoints you disagree with. That is good stress, and a necessary and quite frankly

unavoidable part of life. Yet there's a huge difference between picking apart

the philosophies of people you disagree with, such as Ayn Rand whose magnum opus,

Atlas Shrugged, this liberal snowflake has read twice, and this: START OF CLIP: "I will tell you one UW Milwaukee

student that does not need to man-up. That is Justine Cramer. Do you know about

Justine Cramer? Have any of you fallin - come into contact with this person?

This quote-unquote non-binary trans. You're not laughing now.

You know him. This quote unquote non-binary trans woman forced his way

into the women's locker rooms this year. Who knows about this story, any of you? I

see you don't even read your own student media. He got into the women's room the

way liberals always operate, using the government and the courts, to weasel

their way where they don't belong." END OF CLIP. That awful person

is Milo Yiannopoulos outing a transgender student at a school he was touring for no

discernible reason. There is no educational value in allowing bullies to

harass the oppressed. When someone says that abusive language is a necessary and

vital part of a healthy democracy, they are placing the burden of their ideals

on the most marginalized, and harming them in the process. They are creating the

perfect environment for bullies like Milo to flourish. This is what

philosopher Karl Popper termed the "Paradox of Tolerance" in his book "The

Open Society and Its Enemies," writing: "If we extend unlimited tolerance, even to

those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend the tolerant society

against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed and

tolerance with them." Essentially, if you allow all people in your society, even

pieces of shit that want to kill other people, to express their viewpoints

equally with non-pieces of shit, then you shouldn't be surprised when they start

killing people. Today, we talked about hate speech legislation and the cultural

barriers that make its implementation so difficult in the United States. We

Illustrated how the slippery slope fallacy is often used to perpetuate

those barriers. We discussed content-neutral speech restrictions and

how they are often used to perpetuate systemic racism. We also talked about how

and why abusive language is a form of violence. Lastly we talked about Karl

Popper's "Paradox of Tolerance." Now this may all sound dire, but finally on a

personal level what can you do to help? Firstly, and this should be obvious, don't

perpetuate hate speech. Don't make shitty, hateful jokes and

comments. If your point cannot be rewarded in a way that does not

physically harm those around you, then it's not an important comment to make.

Secondly, try not to let other people say hateful things. This is hard because

every situation is different, but it's also necessary. All of us are on the

front lines of bigotry. The Southern Poverty Law Center

has provided a great resource - one I have linked below - that gives you instructions

on how to respond to bigotry in everyday situations. Thirdly, donate to

organizations trying to fight hate. I mentioned the Southern Poverty Law

Center. They are awesome. Thirdly, call your

legislators and let them know that you support hate speech legislation. This

change in our norms is only going to happen if our leaders know where we

stand. Just so you know, the Capital Congressional switchboard is

202-224-3121. Lastly, become involved in the fight

against bigotry, especially if you're white.

Don't Sheet Cake. Use your white toches to shield brown bodies from harm. The

organization "Safety Pin Box" is really great in this regard. They give you

monthly actionable items to follow up on. I've also linked them in the description.

That's all for now. We shoot a new video every month, so stay tuned. The next topic

will be decided entirely by you. So if you have a problem you need help tacklin'

let us know in the comments below/ This video was made possible by our

action-tastic donors over at Patreon. If you like what you see, consider becoming

a patron. A link is also in the description. Subscribe to ConSpot for

more action-oriented updates on our main YouTube channel, and be sure to check out

more action-packed videos. I'm Alex Mell-Taylor, and thanks for turning on the

Action Report. I will see you next month

For more infomation >> How Do We Stop Hate Speech? - The Action Report - Duration: 13:44.

-------------------------------------------

We Spy on you - Massiver Ausbau Der Überwachung in der Schweiz 07.09.2017 - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> We Spy on you - Massiver Ausbau Der Überwachung in der Schweiz 07.09.2017 - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

"Merrily We Roll Along" | Behind the Scenes - Duration: 2:16.

(Singing)

DAMIAN HUMBLEY: Merrily is about three friends,

EDEN ESPINOSA: starting from the demise of their relationship,

culminating down to the moment where they first met.

MARIA FRIEDMAN: We meet three people who have

really made some difficult decisions in their life,

maybe taken some wrong turns

and we have to ask ourselves,

"How did we get to be there?"

"How did these people get to be like this?"

And I think what's so extraordinary

about this piece is it goes backwards.

We track backwards and see all those moments

that they might have made a different choice in their life.

MARK UMBERS: Frank is a complex character.

Because it is told backwards,

we meet him at his most unpleasant.

His journey backwards in terms of his memory is about

re-discovering what fired him up as a young man

and what gave him his ambitions.

You start with these characters

that are kind of at the end of their tether

and then go back to the beginning

through how they lost it,

where they compromised to when they started out.

It's such a different way of looking at life, isn't it?

Instead of going, "Where are they going?"

It's like "Oh no, that's why that happened!"

Because you see the choices that they could've made

and they sometimes take the wrong one.

You're like don't do it.

It's like those wonderful old horror films.

It's simple in that it's just about these three people.

Now, the writing of course is layered

and the relationships are complex

and it goes backwards in time,

but I think that's why it's special because it's just,

it's not trying to be anything other than what it is,

a story about these three and their relationship.

It's about friendship, it's about love,

it's about compromise,

it's about money, responsibility, obligations.

It's about everything that

we experience as friends, really.

There is something for everyone in this show,

whether you are starting out

just trying to take over the world,

whether you have gone through your tragedies,

whether you are going through them now,

whether you've had your triumphs,

whether you have not quite achieved them.

And everything that I'm saying

I think that everyone has something to take from it.

It's a show of reflection, no matter what age you are.

It's one of those shows that never leaves you.

I think people are going to get more

than they bargained for with this production.

For more infomation >> "Merrily We Roll Along" | Behind the Scenes - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

Janis Blums: We have experience against Montenegro (English subtitle) - Duration: 1:53.

For more infomation >> Janis Blums: We have experience against Montenegro (English subtitle) - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

Miami Beach Mayor On 'Nuclear Hurricane' Irma: 'We Don't Want Heroes' | TODAY - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> Miami Beach Mayor On 'Nuclear Hurricane' Irma: 'We Don't Want Heroes' | TODAY - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Beth Ditto - We Could Run (Deutscher Radiopreis 2017 - 2017-09-07) - Duration: 4:41.

For more infomation >> Beth Ditto - We Could Run (Deutscher Radiopreis 2017 - 2017-09-07) - Duration: 4:41.

-------------------------------------------

"We have to rotate" – Jurgen Klopp happy with Liverpool squad depth - Duration: 3:43.

"We have to rotate" – Jurgen Klopp happy with Liverpool squad depth

Jurgen Klopp has revealed that he plans to continue rotating his Liverpool starting lineup throughout a congested 2017/18 campaign.

After sealing their place in the Champions League, the Reds face a busy season fighting on four fronts: in Europe as well as the Premier League, FA Cup and the League Cup.

Having taken on Hoffenheim over two legs to qualify for the continent's top-tier tournament, Klopp's side played five times in the first month of the season.

This saw the German make five changes to his lineup between those clashes with the Bundesliga outfit, with an altered side winning 1-0 at home to Crystal Palace.

And with a potential 27 games to play before the end of the year, this approach is set to stay.

"You have to accept this at the beginning of the season: I cannot make all players happy in each second of the day," Klopp told reporters on Friday.

"We spoke about this. If somebody who is not involved loses confidence, I can't change. "It's always a decision for one game, and the players react really well in situations like this.

"We made a few changes [before Palace], and it was really good. "We need to perform all of the time, we need to be ready all the time. That means we have to rotate if we can.

"Lineups can be different, it won't always happen because rhythm is important. We need those options, and now we have those options.".

One such option is 17-year-old academy graduate Ben Woodburn, who returned from the international break having scored once and assisted once for Wales.

Woodburn netted the winner on his debut for Chris Coleman's side against Austria, leading to a new nickname, but Klopp is eager to remain patient with the youngster's development.

"I love the phrase 'Prince of Wales', I'm not sure he likes it too much! I'm really, really happy for him," he said.

"He's our player, that's maybe the best news. We try to help him, we try to protect him with all we have. "We are in close contact. Yes, he had these minutes for Wales; we have to give him education and training.

"He will play wherever he is needed, and that's good for his development. "I have at least a minimum of 50 percent responsibility for his development. We know about [this] and we are really ready to live it.

"That doesn't mean he can't start for us tomorrow—yes he can, in some games. "He had good games in pre-season, and you could really see in the last two weeks that everything came back.

"He really played football, he's very football smart. We are happy to have him, and we still want to help him in his development.".

For more infomation >> "We have to rotate" – Jurgen Klopp happy with Liverpool squad depth - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

WE NEED TO TALK!.... REALTALK! - Duration: 8:40.

hey everyone welcome back and if you're a first-time are welcome my name is

Shalayna Janelle today I want to talk about natural disasters and our role as

the church okay what role do we play when natural disasters come about and

that is what I want to address in today's video amen

so as most of us are aware hurricane Harvie hit Houston Texas and it did

damage and so that is the natural disaster that most of us are aware of

right now at this curved point in the United States and yes

talks of hurricane Emma it is going around about what's hurricane or am I

gonna do in Florida and so what is our role with these things and so I want to

talk about that based off of the Word of God and what we are to do as the body of

Christ because I realized that a lot of times in the body of Christ Christians

don't know what to do they don't know their stance in matters like these they

don't know sometimes they feel like they don't even know what Jesus would do and

so I want to talk about that because it is important and it is pivotal to do

what the Word of God says we should do pertaining to these matters okay and I

want to bring some clarity based off of the Word of God to what our role is as

the body of Christ in situations such as this many of you are familiar with

hurricane harpy that just hit Houston Texas and so we need to be prepared and

we need to be in the right position in the right stance doing the right things

when when circumstances as such arise amen first John chapter 3 verses 17 and

18 says but whoso hath this world's good and sees his brother have need and

shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him how dwelleth the love of God in

him my little children let us not love in Word neither in tongue but in deed

and in truth and so we're supposed to love in deed and in truth and it says

that if you have this world's good which could be finances or resources whatever

it is that you have that someone can be in need of it says that you should not

withhold it from your brother you should have compassion

should on them and be able to give them the resources or the finances or

whatever it is that they need because that is our job as Christians and ask

believers it is what is expected of us from God amen and so in this video I

want to give you guys a couple of things that could help you on extending

yourself when it comes to matters like this and natural disasters okay and so

here we go the number one thing you can do is pray of course

second chronicles seven and fourteen says if my people which are called by my

name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked

ways then will I hear from heaven and forgive their sins and then I will heal

the land and so we know that it is a pivotal thing to pray as a believer the

Bible says to pray without ceasing amen and so we are to always stay in a

position of Prayer this is at all times this has nothing to do with when a

disaster strikes this is living a lifestyle of being laid

out before the Lord in prayer to the Lord so that even when things like this

come you're not thrown off and trying to form a prayer life all of a sudden and

trying to get a prayer through to God but you already have a prayer life

because you're living a lifestyle of praying without ceasing okay and so one

thing I want to really stress is praise strategic prayers don't say things like

oh god bless them oh god just do this Oh God

strategic prayers and how do you pray strategic prayers go into the Word of

God and get scriptures and prayers from the Word of God and begin to decree

declare those things because God honors his word it says he will honor his word

he will perform that which he has set out his word to do amen and also

strategic prayers based off of the need that you see go do some research it is

so easy to do research nowadays even on Google and then pray for the need amen

and ask God to give you what to pray for amen

another thing you could do is to send funds send relief okay and so as we read

prior in 1st John chapter 3 verses 17 18 we are to do good with the earthly

goods that we have amen and so you can send funds if you have it you can create

a fundraiser or something and send some relief over to these places for those in

need and like I said before this is in general as well we should always be

lending to those in need giving to those in need and you know helping homeless

and helping those who are just needy it is a part of our job as believers and so

you can find a local national or international charity to donate to or

partner with and you can start a fundraiser do things like that you can

send your donations to charities such as Samaritan's Purse

and they are a Christian organization and they help out with things just like

this and I know that they're sending lots of relief and they're sending teens

and and things like that so you can definitely donate to Samaritans person

if you are interested in doing so I'll put a link to Samaritan's Purse in the

description box amen and so I just want to encourage each and every one of you

to consider giving some form of relief or funds amen and so one other thing up

and recommend is if you happen to be in the surrounding areas to volunteer to

help out with those things that need to be taken care of it is an awesome thing

if you're in the area and you do have the means to be able to help out and if

you are led by the spirit to help out okay

I'm not encourage anyone to put themselves in danger and put themselves

in harm's way but if the Lord gives you the unction go help out there's so many

people that when Hurricane Katrina came along they helped out even if they

waited months for all the water to go down and all that stuff they went and

they helped out so just seek the Lord as to what he wants you to do amen you

should always be praying amen said early send funds if you have it but

also if you are in the surrounding areas see what they need see how you can be of

service amen also don't go just to say you went don't

go just to you know get a badge on your chest to say I did this I did that being

led by the Spirit of God and do the service and the work of the Lord if he's

calling you to do that particular thing man Isaiah six and eight says and I

heard the voice of the Lord saying whom shall I send who shall go for us and I

said Here I am send me I'll go and that was what Isaiah said and so there's

always a people who have a spirit of Here I am send me I go because send me

I'll go because the Lord is looking for those people to go amen so just listen

to what the Spirit of the Lord is saying and just do what the Lord is telling you

to do amen so I pray this has helped you out and I pray that it just propels you

to go and abound in the work of the Lord that Jesus Christ has called each and

every one of us as the body of Christ to do amen and remember the verse that we

read I'm going to read it again it's first John chapter 3 verse 17 and 18 and

it says but who so had this world's good and see its it seeth his brother in need

and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him how dwelleth the love of God in

him my little children let us not love in Word neither in tongue but in deed

and in truth let your life be a life that loves in deed and in truth have a

blessed and prosperous rest of your day today in Jesus name on behalf of

schlange now ministries a percentage of the proceeds from the show anagen a

boutique which consists of apparel and the backing of comedy book which is

newly released a percentage of those proceeds will be donated to those

affected by Hurricane Harvey and so if you're interested please prayerfully

consider to help those who are in need if you have a prayer request feel free

to leave a comment below or you can send your prayer requests to prayer as

chilena Janelle comm and you will be interceded for throughout the week

we

For more infomation >> WE NEED TO TALK!.... REALTALK! - Duration: 8:40.

-------------------------------------------

We proudly present to you: The Djellaba - Duration: 0:50.

For more infomation >> We proudly present to you: The Djellaba - Duration: 0:50.

-------------------------------------------

We Matter #StrongerTogether - Full - Duration: 4:21.

When I'm feeling down or sad,

I usually talk to a friend about it.

I would listen to music or relax.

I like to play videogames.

I make sure I give myself some time away from everyone

and I take care of myself, like

I'll cook food for myself and I enjoy that.

Read a book, watch a movie

Write as much poetry as I can.

I think of my two nieces: Mary Jane and Rhea.

I think of them in my head over and over again.

I'll play basketball when I'm mad

cause it'll cool me down, cool me off.

I normally go on YouTube and watch funny videos.

Calling a helpline would be really good.

Well, traditional dancing helps me get rid of stress

and my low mood.

I think crying is really important

cause just to get that emotion out of you.

Punch a pillow.

Sometimes I smudge.

When I don't feel well, I'll talk to...

like my dad, my brothers.

I could let them know that I am there for them

and they have someone to talk to.

Maybe I'll take them out to eat.

People like that.

I tell them that it's OK to feel how they feel.

Well, I just try to take their mind off of it

so maybe we'll go to the beach or go swimming.

Just like going for a walk, mostly.

That helps a lot.

I tell them, "Oh, this helps me, maybe you can try this

"and I'll be with you."

Make sure not to force them to open up,

but just make sure that they know you're there for them.

Or if they need a shoulder to cry on,

I'll be by their side.

If he can't resolve it youself, you should go to an adult

and talk to them and tell them what happened.

I didn't know that.

That's pretty cool. It's a good thing to know.

Even though they probably don't think they need the help,

they'll get at least a notification.

Sometimes I see some things that like...

I don't know if they should be posting

or if it's healthy for them to post.

I actually had someone flag me once.

It was my own auntie.

I know it's helped me multiple times.

Cause when I help my friends, it feels good.

Having that support makes all of you stronger and have a bond.

Because everybody needs someone

if they know it or not at the moment.

If you need help,

go get some help

and if you can't, I'll come along with you.

If you're feeling sad,

you could talk to me

or anyone you know.

I really encourage you to reach out to someone

if you are hurting very badly.

Talk to someone, even sitting on the phone with someone.

No matter how hard things get, there's always a way forward.

You're awesome.

You're cool. I love you.

For more infomation >> We Matter #StrongerTogether - Full - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

We are expecting orders for more 200 Advanced Light Helicopters ALH Soon HAL Chief - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> We are expecting orders for more 200 Advanced Light Helicopters ALH Soon HAL Chief - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Gov. Scott: We Are Running Out Of Time - Duration: 18:35.

For more infomation >> Gov. Scott: We Are Running Out Of Time - Duration: 18:35.

-------------------------------------------

WE ARE LIMITLESS | Leeor Alexandra Channel Trailer - Duration: 2:24.

For more infomation >> WE ARE LIMITLESS | Leeor Alexandra Channel Trailer - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

We Are Pregnant - Sweet Story of a Husband and Wife - Duration: 3:34.

We Are Pregnant - Sweet Story of a Husband and Wife

We Are Pregnant - Sweet Story of a Husband and Wife

We Are Pregnant - Sweet Story of a Husband and Wife