OBESITY AND LIFTING,IS IT SAFE?|WHEN TO CHANGE A FITNESS PROGRAM|SHOULD I WORKOUT UNDER SRESS?|AIG
Insane Photos That Show How Insanely Cold It Is In America Right Now
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
-------------------------------------------
If You're Happy and You Know It Baby Star Kids Song & Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 2:06.
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your head
Head!
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your nose
Nose!
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your chin
Chin!
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your arm
Arm!
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your leg
Leg!
One little finger, one little finger, one little finger
Tap tap tap
Point your finger up
Point your finger down
Put it on your foot
Foot!
Put it on your leg
Leg!
Put it on your arm
Arm!
Put it on your chin
Chin!
Put it on your nose
Nose!
Put it on your head
Head!
Now let's wave goodbye 48 00:02:14,229 --> 00:00:05,000 Goodbye!
-------------------------------------------
Earth Is Drifting From The Sun, And So Are All The Planets - Duration: 4:52.
While our planet has recently reached its closest point to the Sun, it is still drifting
as are the other planets away from the Sun.
Our orbital path might seem the same throughout the years but the truth is, it is constantly
changing.
Forbes recently posted an article that has been blowing up on the topic and in their
article, they go over how this year in 2019 our perihelion was 1.5 centimeters further
away than it was last year.
This basically highlighting how we are currently as close to the Sun as we will ever be again
since we will never be able to pass that new threshold we've set in place.
This is not a new concept and is something we have all known for quite a while but many
people just don't get it.
One important thing to note is that our orbit around the Sun as is, is not a perfect circle.
It is elliptical and because of the tidal interaction between the Sun and Earth, we
are very slowly moving away from it.
The rotation of the Sun itself pushes us further and further away from it as the years pass.
Cornell University also noted as follows on the topic:
There is another effect which is also small, but somewhat bigger than the tidal effect.
The Sun is powered by nuclear fusion, which means the Sun is continuously transforming
a small part of its mass into energy.
As the mass of the Sun goes down, our orbit gets proportionally bigger.
However, over the entire main sequence lifetime of the Sun (about 10 billion years), the Sun
will only lose about 0.1% of its mass, which means that the Earth should move out by just
~150,000 km (small compared to the total Earth-Sun distance of ~150,000,000 km).
If we assume that the Sun's rate of nuclear fusion today is the same as the average rate
over those 10 billion years (a bold assumption, but it should give us a rough idea of the
answer), then we're moving away from the Sun at the rate of ~1.5 cm (less than an inch)
per year.
I probably don't even need to mention that this is so small that we don't have to worry
about freezing.
Many factors go into making up our orbit and can influence it in different ways.
The presence of matter particles, the creation of gravitational waves, and so much more all
go into what makes up the path we move forth on.
The Sun is constantly emitting energy and in a process of nuclear fusion.
Because of this, the Sun itself is losing mass as time goes by.
This loss while minor lessens the gravitational pull that the Sun has on all the objects within
our solar system.
This topic is one that many find quite confusing, Ethan Siegel an Astrophysicist who wrote the
Forbes article mentioned above went on to note as follows in his writing:
The Sun's mass loss, by burning its nuclear fuel, ensures that every mass orbiting in
our Solar System is slowly spiraling outward as time goes on.
Some 4.5 billion years ago, our planet was around 50,000 kilometers closer to the Sun
than it is today and will grow more distant more rapidly as the Sun continues to evolve.
With each and every orbit that passes, the planets become progressively less tightly-bound
to our Sun.
The rate at which the Sun burns through its fuel is increasing, accelerating the rate
at which all the planets spiral outwards.
While this should never unbind any of the planets we have today, the slow, steady, outward
migration of every world is inevitable.
What do you think about all of this?
I for one find it to be quite fascinating.
The universe as we know it is far more complex than most of us care to stop and think about.
-------------------------------------------
04/02/2019 Monday1️⃣ IQ Test (find where it is🔍) 星期一1️⃣的智力測驗(大家一起找它出來吧🔎)🤓🎓👀 - Duration: 6:58.
For more infomation >> 04/02/2019 Monday1️⃣ IQ Test (find where it is🔍) 星期一1️⃣的智力測驗(大家一起找它出來吧🔎)🤓🎓👀 - Duration: 6:58. -------------------------------------------
US| Ralph Northam is resigning. He just doesnt know it yet. The Washington Post - Duration: 3:31.
US| Ralph Northam is resigning. He just doesnt know it yet. The Washington Post
Ralph Northam is the former governor of Virginia. He just doesnt know it yet.
His governorship ended, as a practical matter, on Friday night, he was in a just surfaced 1984 photograph from his medical school yearbook of one man in blackface and another in a Ku Klux Klan robe and hood.
The Democratic governor attempted weakly to apologize in written and video statements Friday, and then, bizarrely, to his admission.
But his flailing doesnt much matter, because he has been denounced and disowned by his fellow Democrats; his only path forward as governor is as pariah and laughingstock.
The against Northam by his fellow Democrats has been overwhelming: members of the Virginia congressional delegation and Democratic caucuses in the state legislature, the former governor, the incoming head of the Democratic Governors Association, the mayor of Richmond, presidential candidates, Virginias legislative black caucus, the NAACP and a whos who of activists on the left.
Rejecting Northams weak attempts at an apology, former senator Barbara Boxer D Calif. put it best: Its not about apologizing, governor, its about having failed to reveal and explain your deep racist past as you ran as a Democrat in the 21st century.
Northam must think this terribly unfair. He : Army doctor treating those wounded in the Persian Gulf War, pediatrician who volunteered at a childrens hospice. But some things should disqualify people from public service — a Nazi salute, sexual assault, preying on children and, yes, dressing as a Klansman or in blackface — and it doesnt matter if it happened 35 years ago.
The Democrats swift and severe reaction is reassuring. They have said allegations of past misconduct made Alabamas failed Senate candidate Roy Moore, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh and, above all, President Trump unfit to serve, but they are holding their own to account as well. This isnt about politics but about right and wrong.
Republicans, fitfully, appear to be coming to terms with this, too, even as they continue to avert their gaze from Trumps behavior. Last week, Florida Secretary of State Mike Ertel, recently appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis R , when a 2005 photo of him in blackface surfaced. The previous week, House Republicans, after years of tolerating the racist antics of Rep. Steve King R Iowa , of his committee assignments and a resolution condemning white supremacy though they a full censure of King .
The MeToo movement has nine members of Congress and scores of others in politics and journalism, Megyn Kelly was at NBC after she defended blackface, and efforts to purge Confederate icons an idea Northam supported and his 2017 opponent, Ed Gillespie, opposed have proliferated.
Some might think this all a witch hunt, to use the presidents term of art, but it is, at least in part, a salutary backlash against what Trump represents. Appalled by his racism, his vulgarity and his appalling treatment of women, we are reacting by holding public officials and hopefully ourselves to a higher standard. We are cleansing ourselves for the sins of Trump.
Likely the purge goes too far at times. at the way Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand D N.Y. railroaded her colleague Al Franken D Minn. from the Senate. But the reinvigorated movement to hold public officials accountable for actions past and present means that Americans are not letting Trump define downward acceptable behavior: Republicans tribal loyalty lets him get away with disgusting behavior, but we are not letting it become normalized.
Those on the right were poised to pounce on Democrats for failing to denounce Northam after they asserted the relevance of Kavanaughs behavior 35 years ago and Moores behavior about 40 years ago. Right wing blogger Erick Erickson that Democrats were doubling down defending Northam and said those who think wearing a Make America Great Again cap makes you racist are really quiet about Northam.
But as an avalanche of condemnation quickly built, Erickson because the reaction proves me wrong.
Certainly, Democrats could do better. Party figures have been slow to criticize Rep. Rashida Tlaib D Mich. the anti Semitic dual loyalty slander to say those who supported a bill countering anti Israel boycotts .
But their reaction to Northam shows they wont excuse in fellow partisans behavior even 35 years distant they condemn in Trump acolytes such as Corey A. Stewart a who had Trumps backing in his unsuccessful GOP Senate bid in Virginia and DeSantis who won despite telling voters not to by electing his African American opponent . Hopefully Republicans, in small gestures such as their belated denunciation of King, are beginning to think about purging the greater poison Trump has injected into their party.
We are better than what Trump makes us appear to be.
Read more from , or .
Read more:
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
-------------------------------------------
TRIP REPORT: SPIRIT - Big Front Seat, is it worth it? - Las Vegas ✈ Denver - Airbus A320 - Duration: 8:06.
Hello, good morning from the McCarran Airport here in Las Vegas.
I'm here to fly with Spirit to Denver in Colorado.
We're trying out their bigger seats. Let's see if it's worth the extra $36.
We're gonna pick up my boarding pass now, so let's go.
There are two terminals at McCarran Airport. All Spirit flights depart from Terminal 1, the oldest of the two.
There are several self-service kiosks where you can get your boarding pass
and your baggage label if you're checking in a suitcase.
You have to pay to bring a carry-on suitcase on board.
This is specifically mentioned on your boarding pass and they promised that they charge $65 at the gate
if you're bringing one with you, and you hadn't paid for it before.
It's actually cheaper to book a checked suitcase than a carry-on.
A personal item that fits underneath the seat, like a backpack, can be brought on board for free.
After I went through security, I made my way to the gate passing several slot machines.
This is still Las Vegas after all.
My flight departed from the B-concourse. A circular, bright concourse with a bar and of course more slot machines.
Unfortunately with a lack of working power outlets.
From the gate I had a magnificent view over The Strip of Las Vegas, which will see even better in a minute.
So stay tuned.
Besides The Strip, you also have a great view on other traffic around the airport. Primarily other Spirit aircraft.
Spirit is very much known for its kind of cheapish looking yellow aircraft.
Besides the yellow livery, Spirit also flies with another less notable livery.
And that's the aircraft we're flying on today that just arrived from an almost 5 hour flight from Newark Airport.
It's an Airbus A320, that was delivered to spirit just under four years ago.
Spirit operates a total of 128 planes all single aisle Airbus aircraft.
After announcing multiple times that hand-luggage has to be paid for, it was time to board the aircraft.
As mentioned in the beginning of the video I was seated in a Big Front Seat.
We'll have a closer look at that just after take off.
There are a total of 182 seats on this aircraft.
174 regular seats and 8 big front seats.
The big front seats are all located in the front of the aircraft in a two-by-two configuration.
The tray table can be found on the armrest.
The seats are wide enough that you never touch elbows with your neighbour.
Also, legroom is great, especially compared with the regular seats as seen on the screen now.
They have a seat pitch of only 28 inches, which is the lowest of all US carriers. None of the seats recline.
Spirit offered drinks and snacks onboard. A can of coke costs $3, which is pretty affordable for a low-cost airline.
A beer or wine is a bit more expensive with $7.
There are no full meals available. The closest thing that comes to a full meal is their $7.00 snack box.
A nice touch is the map on the back of the menu with all destination Spirit fly to, the majority on the US East Coast.
If you're very hungry, the snack box is a decent filler. It comes with crackers and a cheese spread,
skittles, chocolate cookies and almonds. A great alternative to peanuts for whom many people are allergic.
Also to be found in the seat pocket is the safety card
Is it worth the extra $36?
The big front seat is very spacious and has a lot of legroom compared to the cramped regular seat.
They're almost identical to the first-class seat that I had on Delta's Boeing 717, but without a power outlet.
The seat does not come with priority boarding or any extra services,
but then again they only paid $36 extra for a seat, which in my eyes is a steel.
Spirit is a great airline to get somewhere cheaply.
But if it's available, I do recommend the big seat, especially if you're taller than 6 feet or 1 meter 83.
It was my first time flying with Spirit and I really enjoyed it.
If you're not used to flying low-cost airlines,
make sure you come prepared, because Spirit is one of the most strict low-cost airlines that I've flown.
But if you make sure your luggage is within the allowance or if you're only bringing a small bag,
you'll have a great time.
Thank you very much for watching. If you enjoyed watching it, please give the video a big thumbs up.
And if you're new to the channel, please subscribe. And I'll see you next week.
-------------------------------------------
OLAPLEX 4 AND 5 : 6 MONTH UPDATE... SHOULD YOU BUY IT? (subtítulos en español) - Duration: 8:51.
For more infomation >> OLAPLEX 4 AND 5 : 6 MONTH UPDATE... SHOULD YOU BUY IT? (subtítulos en español) - Duration: 8:51. -------------------------------------------
What is a basic income and how can it work? - Duration: 12:31.
Jay: This time we're going to talk about a universal basic income and some of you
might be thinking what the heck is that? Jane: A universal basic income is an income
paid to individuals as a right of legal residence without means testing or
requirements to work. The payment is non-taxable and should be sufficient to
cover basic needs. Everyone who qualifies for the payment will
receive it from birth till death. Having a basic income in place will provide a
secure floor for people to build on rather than a safety net with holes so
big many fall through. Jay: That's true. Welfare state, that system for example, loads of people fall
through that. It's almost set-up for people to fail. So my old-school point of
view was, I was one of those people that used to, as you know too well, would stand
and stay in line and queue for the check out with a person working at it, because I
saw the self-checkout stuff as, you know, taking away somebody's job. So I'd
be like: well you don't want to be taking away somebody's job because, you know, so I'll
stand in line and the longer queue and wait to be served even rather than use
the self-checkout that's right there; which obviously seems counter-intuitive.
And we spoke to that guy once in one of the supermarkets who was like, oh
well I'm like, it will take your job away and he was like well I'm a photographer
actually, I don't really want this crummy job, and I can't just quit the job 'cause I'll not get
any social security. So I'm stuck in this lousy job, this BS job, that I don't even
like. That was his view, he was like I'd rather be doing something else. So it was
like, actually we're keeping people in jobs that computers can take just for the
sake of that, as almost like we're creating work, you know, work supposed to
be a means to an end, not the end itself, isn't it? So that made me realise, not
just that guy, but a few other pieces of information out there about automation is
actually a part of progress. That if a computer can take your job you
probably shouldn't necessarily be doing the job in the first place. Jane: Yeah, exactly, yeah. So that's one of the biggest reasons I think for a basic income,
is the level of technological development and the fact that we have
enough kind of technological change to take a lot of the jobs but we
have to change the way that society and the economy's structured so that isn't
damaging and people have got no money. So this is a way that we can actually
address that: a basic income. Other reasons for a basic income include
the benefits of reducing working hours and sharing jobs that are left that need
to be done, that can't be done by robots, amongst everybody else. There's a
report that's just come out today, well on Friday, I don't know it depends if you're
a Patreon member if you get this on Friday, this video, which is by Autonomy.
Which is basically arguing for a shorter working week, it shows about how the,
how that basically could result in benefits for people's mental health and especially,
well as long as it's, you get the same amount of money. You couldn't like have a
shorter working week and people aren't paid as much, that obviously wouldn't
result in these benefits. Jay: Yeah, they're skint enough as it is at the moment. Jane: Exactly. And that's the key thing about basic
income, it obviously would supplement income that would be lost from not working
as much. And then obviously there's the benefit of environmental sustainability
of reducing jobs, especially bullshit jobs and managerial feudalism having all
these people working underneath you and they don't need to. Jay: I have a secretary.
Jane: Yes. Jay: I don't Jane: I'm important!
And then obviously productive workforce as well, because if you work less you're
probably gonna be more enthused to get your stuff done. More free time as well,
which also relates to the benefits of being able to be creative, which is an
advantage of basic income. As Jay said, somebody wanted to be a photographer and
we've all got creativity in us, it's just often not economically viable to do
it as a job. And then also other things, good reasons for basic income: better
working rights. So basically if, you know, trade unionism has been attacked and
especially since Thatcher onwards; she saw it as a political thing that was all
about supply economics making it, supply-side economics, making it easier
to attack the workforce and make more money for the 1%. So if you had a basic income
you would be less scared of being sacked and which would increase the power of
collective bargaining. There's also, so trade unions should be getting behind
this as well because it actually would benefit them. Jay: Some of them are, I think Unison are aren't they. So like my dad always used to tell me that story
where, well he'd be like, well I used to leave work, leave a job, quit my job on
the Friday and by Monday I just walk into another job because we all
had power because there were that many jobs available. It turned the tables and
workers, this was post-war, the people had options. Well you'd have that if you had a basic
income, you know you're gonna be alright anyway, so you've got that bargaining.
Jane: It's like works a top-up isn't it then. You know what I mean. It's something that you
do to be able to go on holiday. Other reasons for why basic income
is a good idea is there's a lot of valuable unpaid work that is done mainly
like child care or housework, that you know, that is really valuable but people
don't get paid for. And it takes a lot of time as well; so that would be helped by
a basic income. It also improves democracy because you're more likely to get
involved in your local community or politics. I mean a big reason people
don't get involved in politics is it takes a lot of time and money to be able to run a
campaign or also, you know, people might, you know, a lot of people are just so
fried by their job, they're working so many hours, you know, to come back home
and go out and do a campaign it takes a lot of time. But also there's a massive
problem with means-tested benefits. There's more unclaimed benefits because they're
means-tested, then there are like fraud; which you wouldn't know because of the
media constantly talking about 'scroungers' or producing a new Channel
4 doc, show about it or whatever. But you know this would be
transparent, it be universal, which would be a massive plus of it. I really like
David Harvey's work who's studied Karl Marx for many years and he did a
podcast recently about Karl Marx's view on freedom; is that you know you can only
really have true freedom, it should be, you know the right, the right wing,
the free market advocates have like taken freedom as something that is
like theirs. But actually it should be a democratic socialist, it should be a socialist
concept because freedom can only be really achieved when you have basic things
covered. So you know you can only have proper freedom if you have a house, if
you can eat, if you have time to do things, like we were talking about democracy or creativity
you know freedom should be seen as a socialist thing.
It should be something we are talking about on the left in terms of all these issues and basic income, if
framed properly, could be key to that. Jay: Yeah. On that, in one of my documentaries years ago
I talked about the ideas of, you know, I was talking about, a big part of it was the
prison system, Doncatraz, where I am from, Doncaster. So
the idea of, the concept of freedom, to be all like theoretical and philosophical
about it, but freedom's role inside different levels of prisons if you've, if
you're in poverty or you can't, you know, you have no access to clean water in
certain parts of the world, you know, that's a form of imprisonment anyway.
That restricts your freedoms anyway, so that's a really important
thing that we think of freedom as a person's ability to do things, do stuff,
like basic income would be a big part of that. One of the main things that
people always say, because just wait a moment, we know some of you might even
be thinking this. Oh well hang on, if you're just given money, you've not got any
incentive, if you're just given money, you know, what are these people gonna do? They're just
gonna sit around, sit around all day, and not do anything. Oh thanks, right there we go. Jane: Are you just gonna sit around with that are you? Jay: Not with a tenner, I'm probably not!
So one of the things is, is that when people have been asked, according to a lot of the
research that's been done around this. When people have been asked: what would
you do if you had a basic income. And they go: oh, well I'd do this,
I'd set-up a local community group, I'd get involved in art workshops or
whatever. All this stuff. But when you ask them what they think somebody else would
do, it's like: oh somebody else, they'd just spend it on cigs and booze.
Somebody else would just do that. And actually people at their heart are really good, most
people are pretty nice as Rutger Bregman said. So it's like, you know, actually a lot of
people would do, well most people would do something really cool, if they
had the freedom to do all the things that they want to pursue but can't.
Because they're in that sort of, in that trap. The other main criticism,
I mean there's quite a few criticisms, misguided criticisms, a lot of them around this. One of them is:
where would you get the money from in our country to just give
everyone a basic income? There's a couple of things on that. The first one is, actually
a lot of the costs of the sort of the welfare system, the health care system,
all those things that are impacted by people being in such poverty all
the time. Those costs will go down anyway. And the other thing is, is that, you know
nobody asked: well where are we gonna get the money from to bomb Iraq? Or whatever.
Or to renew trident? And it comes to these bankers who then give themselves big
bonuses, they find money for it. So of course, this is a simple thing, the
returns on that investment will be huge anyway so you'd save a lot of money
anyway. But even if you didn't save money, the fact that you can find money for all
these things, as a government, but not this, it just shows you that it's a
choice. It's a choice that we could make. Jane: Absolutely, totally agree. Jay: Oh and so one of the other
concerns around it is that if people had a basic income, and it's kind
of a valid concern, okay you've got your basic income but then your rent
goes up. Or the cost of food goes up. Or they start implementing costs on health
care services and things like that. Well you've got a basic income so if you've got some
money, and you're guaranteed, it's a guaranteed universal basic income, then we'll start
charging you for all these little things. And, you know, so that's a valid concern
but that's why, you know, it'd have to be structured within a wider framework
wouldn't it. Jane: Yeah and ideally that would be a democratic socialist programme, which is
becoming increasingly, you know, backed in mainstream, by mainstream politicians, and
political parties such as Corybn's Labour Party. And basically that would mean
that you would have things such as rent controls bought in, you'd need capital
controls as well on an international level because you'd also want to be
bringing in, you know, like wealth taxes and maximum wage.
Maximum wage is to reduce inequality. Wealth is the biggest source of
inequalities; it's not always income, it's also wealth - what you own - so you'd obviously
have to address that. But you need capital controls to make sure that, you know, we
have democratic control over that ability to bring that political program
in. You'd also, you know, things such as cooperatives and public ownership
of transport and energy and all those kind of things, those vital services,
would need to, you know, would be an important part of it as well. 'cause
basically without all that, basic income could become something that,
you know, could be abused, it could do. You've got to address that issue
that, it could be a way of getting rid of the welfare state and then just giving
people barely anything to live on. And that is a concern that people have but
that's why it's got to be seen in a broader framework of it basically being
part of a post-work society really where we accept that technology is developed
so much that we can have it to help us rather than it being seen as a problem.
It's something that can like aid us to become more creative, something that
people like Keynes even, they didn't imagine we'd be working like the hours we are
and that links to the concept of bullshit jobs being, you know, which is our obsession
with work in society. The idea of value and worth comes from what you do
even if you know that that job probably isn't that valuable.
You know least you're getting, you know, that tick: I do a job. So we've got to question
everything and basic income is part of that I think,
isn't it? And that's why we are big advocates of it but within that
framework. Jay: Yeah and again it comes down to work, you know, work is a means to an
end, not the end itself. Jane: So, if you liked what we were saying there and you would like to
support what we do, please consider checking out our Patreon and potentially
become a Patron of ours. We're also on all forms of social media, aren't we? Jay: We are. We're on Instagram,
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. Jane: You can also subscribe to our YouTube, that helps.
Jay: And you can subscribe to our newsletter, as well, through our website. Jane: Yes, lots of ways
to keep in touch.
-------------------------------------------
Can You Have Body Like Kylie Jenner Without Surgeries? - Duration: 2:50.
Kylie Jenner is famous for her body and millions of her fans dream of having the same or similar
one.
Take a look at the YouTube videos and you'll see hundreds of them showing her workout routines
and diets.
Many people try to copy Kylie's fitness lifestyle, but the question is - Can You Really Have
a Body Like Kylie Jenner Without Surgeries?
If you aren't a fitness expert, it can be difficult to understand how one gets such
a figure - is it genetics?
tons of exercise? or is it simply caused by having lots of money that can buy top plastic
surgeons?
The answer is simple - it can be all of them and it really depends on an individual.
Can you get such body with diet and exercise only?
Absolutely.
Is it easy?
absolutely not.
Will those exercise programs and diet plans get you such body?
Yes, but they do not tell you one thing - the process is really, really slow.
you have to be extremely patient as it doesn't happen overnight.
Or even over a month.
But what about genetics?
Unfortunately it plays a role and it can either help you or go against you.
If you are naturally extremely skinny, for example, it will be tough to achieve the same
curves Kylie has without years of the effort.
What about plastic surgery?
Sure, go ahead if you have lots of money.
It is a shortcut to it, but you will still have to eat right and exercise.
There's no easy way of doing it.
Keep in mind - You don't have to be a clone of somebody to look good.
You can still have a great body if you follow simple fitness and nutrition program, regardless
of what you currently look.
But it won't happen by watching videos that promise you body transformations in 2 weeks.
Yes, you can have a great body without plastic surgery and thousands of people who exercise
and eat healthy are the proof.
The only thing is that it takes lots of effort and time, so you must be constistent and patient.
You know why not many people have body like hers?
not because others do not get plastic surgeries, but because they give up after few weeks of
exercising.
It is one thing to want something and another to actually keep doing things in order to
achieve what you want.
Be easy on yourself, however.
It is pretty much Kylie Jenner's only job in life to look good.
If she doesn't, then nobody would care what she does anyway.
So, she spends lots of time and money on maintaining it.
What do you think about it?
Do you think exercise is enough to look like her?
Let us know in the comments.
-------------------------------------------
pipe dreams is out! - Duration: 13:36.
For more infomation >> pipe dreams is out! - Duration: 13:36. -------------------------------------------
What is Groundhog Day, and why do we celebrate it? - Duration: 1:43.
For more infomation >> What is Groundhog Day, and why do we celebrate it? - Duration: 1:43. -------------------------------------------
There is a Fan in Everyone - Duration: 2:01.
[MUSIC]
I like football
because there's a lot of action, and it's a lot of fun.
It's just a culture here in America.
My name is Mindy Dill
and I am Deaf/Blind.
Before I could see the TV,
but now since I've lost more of my vision
I don't know where the ball is on screen
and often I just can't follow the game.
If I have someone like an interpreter,
or someone sitting behind me
describing on my back what the action that's going on,
I know exactly where the ball is.
What happens is I'll have someone behind me,
or on my knee,
giving me information tactilely
so I can understand exactly what's going on in the game.
Now I can see some of it but I can't see everything.
I can see that they're kicking a ball
but I can't track the ball with my vision
so I can't see where the ball is going
but if I have someone on my back telling me
exactly where the ball is going
I can follow the game easier.
You could use a board that looks like a football field.
A tactile field
with lines and braille numbers
so you'll know where the yard line is
and where the ball is.
Also, there's places on either end
where the field posts are
so you can feel the board
to know what's going on in the game.
I don't wanna stop watching football because I enjoy it.
There are some people who are fully deaf and fully blind
who still enjoy watching games.
And they have people who help them by
describing what's going on on TV.
My name is Mindy Dill
and I love football!
[MUSIC]
-------------------------------------------
Building a Marsbase is a Horrible Idea: Let's do it! - Duration: 9:22.
From hostile deserts, to lonely islands and the highest mountains,
wherever there is space to expand into humans do so.
So, it's hardly surprising that we're already making preparations
to set foot on Mars,
and to create the first permanent colony outside of Earth --
maybe even terraform another planet and turn it into a second blue home.
But wait,
before we can get to the nice future stuff,
we first have to complete the second phase of colonization;
creating a semi-permanent outpost
to prepare the ground for a larger human presence.
But doing so will be gruesome.
Even for an expansionist species like us, Mars is extreme.
At first glance, Mars seems familiar --
polar ice caps, large valleys,
liquid water under its surface,
and a day barely longer than Earth's.
The ideal place for us to go.
Unfortunately, Mars is actually a cold, radioactive desert
where the ground is poisonous and breathing is impossible.
Mars is awful.
You almost certainly don't want to go there.
The pioneers doing the hard work on Mars will have an intensely stressful life,
filled with incredibly challenging problems
never encountered before.
But there are plenty of people willing to do that work
and we have the technology to enable them to do it.
For this video, we will assume there have been prior missions to Mars
to scout out a good place for an outpost,
store resources and equipment,
and that there's already a moon base
that serves as a hub for Mars missions.
The first major challenge for our outpost,
is the fact that Mars is very energy poor.
Because of its distance from the Sun,
solar power is only 40% as effective as on Earth.
But even this weakened sunlight is often obscured for days
by enormous dust storms.
Solar power alone will probably not be enough.
Alternatives, such as wind power, and geothermal energy are also unfeasible
as there's hardly any atmosphere and Mars' interior is much too cold.
Initially, nuclear technology might be the only option.
Since Mars doesn't have easily accessible radioactive elements,
the nuclear fuel needs to come from Earth along with the reactor.
If we do set it up, it could power our small outpost for the first few years.
Unfortunately, all that energy won't be very useful if we can't breathe.
Mars' atmosphere is only 1% as dense as Earth's,
and mostly made up of CO2.
So, now habitats need to be pressurized and filled with an artificial atmosphere
made of nitrogen and oxygen --
Which comes with more problems.
Corners and flat walls are weak points
so the habitats will have rounded and smooth shapes
to handle the stress of great pressure differences between the interior and exterior.
The airlocks need to be very airtight and work perfectly every time.
Without an extensive magnetosphere, or a dense atmosphere,
half of all radiation coming from space reaches the ground.
A person on the surface would be subjected to 50 times the radiation that they would be on Earth.
Three years on the surface of Mars exceeds the radiation dose limits
imposed on NASA astronauts for their entire career.
This increases cancer risks significantly.
To prevent that, we could shield our habitats with a thick layer of frozen CO2,
that can be harvested directly from the atmosphere.
Covering the dry ice with a meter of dirt, would further increase the level of protection.
Sadly, this means almost no windows.
From the inside, most living spaces will be windowless tunnels.
From the outside, they'll look like burial mounds.
All of this would still not hold back all the radiation,
but reduce it just enough to be survivable for long periods of time.
It won't, however, protect anyone who ventures outside.
So, remote-controlled robots will be used for routine work on the surface,
while our crew stays inside.
Staying inside is a good idea for another reason:
Mars dust.
It's much finer than dust on Earth,
so it could find its way into the gears or electronics of our machines.
Because it's also very dry, it's electro-statically charged;
sticking to everything, like spacesuits.
It will be impossible to avoid carrying lots of Mars dust into our habitat,
and into the lungs of our crew.
To make this even worse, Mars' soil is filled with very toxic perchlorate salts.
Constant exposure could be deadly.
This problem can still be overcome though.
Space suits, for example, could be made in a way that they never truly enter the base,
but stay attached to the outside of the habitats.
Okay, great.
Now we've safely isolated humans in terms of energy and air,
and protected them from cancer, we just need to feed them.
Water is easy to come by if a settlement is positioned near the Martian poles
with their thick layers of ice.
Growing food is a different kind of challenge though.
Mars' soils are alkaline
and lack the vital nitrogen compounds that plants need to grow.
Before we can grow anything, we will have to decontaminate the soil
which is difficult and expensive.
Then, the soil can be fertilized using recycled biological waste.
All of this will take a lot of time, and is very energy-intensive.
So, we might use aquaponics to raise fish and plants together --
Making the astronauts' diets more varied and tasty at the same time.
This will be an important psychological boost for our overworked crew.
All of these things don't solve one fundamental problem though:
Mars has only 38 percent of Earth's surface gravity,
which could cause muscle-wasting, bone loss, and cardiovascular problems.
While this might be solved in the future by setting up rotating living spaces,
for now, our crew has to live with low gravity
and exercise a lot to slow the degradation down.
The crews will probably have to rotate every few years,
after being stuck indoors in tight spaces without windows.
With the same people, performing the same routines day-in day-out
with little contact from the outside world,
and a lot to worry about.
Like Antarctic scientists or submarine staff,
they will undergo intense psychological screening
to make sure they're mentally resilient enough to handle this lifestyle for several years.
Establishing the first real infrastructure on Mars will be extremely taxing work
that only a group of very determined, and competent, people can do.
Luckily, we have enough of these on Earth.
And there you have it!
A small Mars base that will survive for at least a few decades --
as long as it's getting a constant supply of resources,
parts, nuclear fuel, and crews from Earth.
Unfortunately, Mars and Earth are separated by millions of kilometers
and orbital periods that leave only a narrow travel window every two years.
If there's an emergency in the colony,
Earth wouldn't be able to help until the next travel window opens.
Helpers may arrive on a planet filled with corpses.
Settling Mars will be the toughest challenge we have ever faced.
It will be gruesome work to establish the infrastructure we need.
But we're stubborn, and we like extreme challenges.
If we push through Phase Two of colonization, anything is possible.
Cities illuminating the dark Martian night,
a hub for travel between the planets,
industries setting foot in orbit
terraforming a true multi-planetary future.
Going to Mars is hard but worth it.
And if we're lucky, we might be around long enough to see it happening
and cheer on the people who take on these challenges
for the benefit of us all.
Figuring out complex stuff is one of the best feelings ever.
Especially if you don't have to do it all by yourself.
Our friends from Brilliant can help you out with that part!
Brilliant is a problem-solving website with a hands-on approach.
Instead of just dropping tricky concepts in front of you,
they help you unravel them bit-by-bit and build up to an interesting conclusion.
This way, science becomes something you actually do actively, and not only hear about.
With Brilliant, you can bear down
on dozens of interesting courses and puzzles about topics,
like solar energy, gravity, and astronomy.
If you visit brilliant.org/nutshell, or click the link in the description,
you can sign up for free and learn all kinds of things.
And, as a bonus for Kurzgesagt viewers,
the first 688 people will also get 20% off their annual membership!
With Brilliant, you finish your day a little bit smarter.
And, no Mars dust to deal with.
We promise!
Can't get enough of Mars?
We've also made a poster about it.
You can learn some more about the hardships of Mars colonization,
or just look at the pretty colors.
Go get it here!
-------------------------------------------
Republicans Don't Have A Single Policy Plan, And The Public Is Catching On - Duration: 4:12.
The Republican Party has a very real problem right now and it's a problem that extends
far beyond the fact that they've got the giant man-Cheeto sitting in the White House.
The problem with the Republican Party today is it they have no agenda.
They have no plans, they have no policies.
They are a party that has completely run out of ideas and the American public is catching
on.
When we look at the Democratic Party right now, what do they stand for and what do they
want or they want a green new deal.
They want Medicare for all.
They want to wish and Free College.
They want to expand social security.
They want a $15 minimum wage.
They want to make sure everybody in this country is taken care of.
They actually do have a list of things that they would like to accomplish.
What are Republicans have seriously?
What are the goals of the current Republican Party?
I mean they still control the Senate and we know they're packing the courts, but beyond
that, what's the goal?
Deregulation and tax cuts.
That's been their song since the 19 eighties and here we are 40 years later and they're
still singing the same tune deregulation and tax cuts.
Okay, well what are we going to do in this congress?
Deregulation and tax cuts.
Okay, we you got anything new?
I mean we, we've heard that before.
We've done it.
Things aren't working so well.
Maybe maybe a new deregulation and tax cuts.
That is today's Republican Party.
It's all they know how to do all they know how to do is tell the government to stop doing
things, deregulation and then, hey, give wealthy people more money and the American public
is getting pissed off.
Majority of people in this country actually want corporations to be held responsible when
they poison us with their environmental pollution.
They do.
Majority of people in this country want the wealthy elite to pay more in taxes.
Majority of people in this country want medicare for all they want plants.
That's the bottom line.
They want a party that has an agenda that has goals and knows how to reach those goals,
and right now that party eight, the Republicans, and to be honest, it hasn't been for quite
some time, but again, the Republican Party doesn't know
who they are.
They don't know where they're going, they don't know how to get there, and I think a
lot of them do realize that they're never going to go anywhere with their current leaders
in place.
Not just Trump.
Mitch McConnell, what's his plan?
What does he want to do?
Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Matt Gaetz.
What's the plan guys?
What's your agenda?
What's your policy?
And I swear to God, if you tell me deregulation and tax cuts, I am going to scream because
I have heard that tone for my entire life.
You have no plans.
You have no ideas.
You have no agenda other than harming the American public in aiding corporations and
the wealthy people are tired of it.
I'm tired of talking about it.
I am tired of living through it and so is everyone else in this country, but this is
what I want people to remember as we head into this election season, which apparently
has already begun at this point.
The Republican Party has no ideas.
The only thing they have our failed policies from the 19 eighties that have repeatedly
proven that they will only benefit the wealthy elite.
Please everyone remember that when you head into the polling booth in November, in 2020.
-------------------------------------------
Pelosi Will Lose It When She Finds Out The Order Trump Just Gave The Military - Duration: 3:03.
Nancy Pelosi has spent the past three months doing everything in her power to block President
Trump's attempts to secure the border.
When she became Speaker, she thought she had Trump cornered.
But she will lose it when she finds out the order Trump just gave the military.
Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has tried for months to impose her open-borders
mentality on the rest of the country.
After working to shut down the federal government in order to deny Trump a badly needed border
wall with Mexico, Pelosi then spent the next month blaming him for the budget crisis while
refusing to negotiate.
But she will be stunned to learn that Trump just outplayed her.
The Daily Caller reports, "The Pentagon is sending several thousand more troops to
the southwestern border, fulfilling a request made by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS)."
There are just 2,300 troops currently stationed on the southern border with Mexico.
But Pentagon officials just revealed that some additional 2,000 troops will be redeployed
to the region at the request of Homeland Security.
The deployment of troops to the border with Mexico was only supposed to last until December
15 last year, but the budget showdown combined with the news that a new wave of caravans
are making their way north has prompted that mission to be extended to September 30.
The deployment of additional troops will cost an estimated 600 million dollars by the end
of September.
"We are supporting our federal partners on the border, and that mission has been extended
until September," stated Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Jamie Davis.
"We are currently sourcing the units involved and there will be an increase of a few thousand
troops."
"Most recently DHS has asked us to support them in additional concertina wire and then
expanded surveillance capability, and we've responded with, you know, here's how many
people it would take", Acting Defense Secretary Pat Shanahan told reporters on Tuesday.
The additional troops come at a time when President Trump is fighting tooth and nail
against Democrats in Washington over border security – namely President Trump's proposal
to build a wall along the Mexican border.
A tentative agreement was recently reached to re-open the government until February 15th,
while Congress negotiates on a compromise proposal to formally end the showdown.
President Trump demanded roughly $5.7 billion in funding to build just over 200 miles of
border walls from Congress.
Construction of the wall would fulfill Trump's biggest campaign pledge in 2016.
However, Democratic leadership has maintained their opposition, framing it as immoral and
too expensive.
It's unclear what that proposal will entail, whether it will pass both Houses of Congress,
and whether President Trump will support it however.
With so much on the line and with no guarantee that Congress will act, President Trump is
now resorting to taking matters into his own hands with the order of additional troops
to the border.
We will keep you up to date with any new developments in this ongoing story.
-------------------------------------------
IS THIS HOW IT FEELS TO WIN AGAIN? - Cowsep - Duration: 20:40.
For more infomation >> IS THIS HOW IT FEELS TO WIN AGAIN? - Cowsep - Duration: 20:40. -------------------------------------------
AUSTRALIA'S GLOBALISTS ARE PREDICTABLE !!! AND BACKWARDS - Duration: 12:22.
Almost everything that you watch on mainstream television with in Australia is controlled by the 1%
the politicians are controlled by the 1% and
if the mainstream media promotes
Social media influencer as well
they are being pushed by the 1% and
today I want to talk about that because
I've seen a lot of you guys leave messages talking about are the globalist and cyanus and the Illuminati and the
Rothschild bankers or whatever and today I'm going to just talk about
Australia and I'm going to try to pitch my case why?
When you watch free-to-air TV in Australia and radio
You are being lied to on a day-to-day minute-to-minute basis
Before we get started if you want to keep up to date with Australia's first geopolitically focus YouTube channel
Make sure you click the subscribe button and click the bell icon. So don't miss out on anything
Today is Sunday the 3rd of February
2019 and I am going to select a
TV show which just started up last week
Called My Kitchen Rules
I am going to try and predict the finalists and the winner and I'm going to tie it into how
the 1% the establishment use
winners losers
the way TV shows and the media
Manipulate you I think they're very predictable if you're watching anything free-to-air on Australian TV or radio
If you're not paying anything for it that makes you the product. I know it's a cliche, but you are the product
Establishment in Australia is very slow. They're very stupid
They're very backwards. And that makes them very predictable. There are they're definitely a
Far less sophisticated version of
China's
Manipulation and propaganda. I think China's propaganda is far more sophisticated than anything Australia has
so my kitchen rules
A few friends were talking about my kitchen rules
And I had a little look at the TV show and I thought this would be this would make a great video
so recently we've had a lot of people chucking tantrums about
Islam and Muslims in Australia there seem to be that the biggest threat
Australia has ever come up against also the African gangs the media likes to attack them
I guess because they can't sue them for defamation
And they're poor
The media only attacks the weak keep in mind and they're and if they're weak and they can't sue you
Therefore how much of a threat can they really be right?
Muslims in Australia, they're not paying off
Politicians they're not buying our media organizations. They're not buying our ports our
infrastructure our electricity grid
So how much threat can the Muslims really be?
well, I
Still believe that the establishment the the top one percent of Australians they control this country
They're stupid enough to think that they are the biggest threat. So
Only the smart people like you guys out there watching this are aware that China is the biggest threat to Australia
So my kitchen Ross, why is this significant? Well, I had a look at the contestants
There's not one South East Asian. I would have thought for a TV show that's films in Sydney if you go outside
the the the dominating demographic is definitely all tight all types of
Southeast Asians, but there's not one contestant on this TV show. So what that is. It's a psychological trick
It makes you believe that there's not that many Asians in Australia
If you're not in an Asian area, you're outside of Sydney or Melbourne. You're in kind of the country
You become oblivious to what's really going on in a cunt in inside, Australia
So it's it's it's a way of manipulating you into a false sense
Then one of the contestants stuck out like a sore thumb
Rommel
He's he he's called a 42 year old Persian man, so he's from Iran
Iran is an enemy of Australia's. Let's not beat around the bush. Iran is our enemy
Iran is working with Team red they are
selling oil to
China and Russia China and Russia are our enemies as well
So this guy Rommel by the looks of him he is
Flamboyantly gay he is over the top flamboyantly gay next level flamboyantly gay
He might if he's not gay I apologize, but he looks gay and that's the most important thing here. So if the
establishment thinks that Islam is one of the biggest problems in Australia and what they want to do is they want to
Moderate the Muslims what you do is you normalize things
So for instance by putting a gay guy from Iran in in the faces of Muslims
So if there's Muslims watching this TV show my kitchen rules and they see Rommel
They're going to be outraged at the beginning but after a while the more gay Muslims they see
the less outraged they become and the more normal it becomes it's the same strategy that China is using in Australia by
Pushing their propaganda everywhere and becoming so blatant about it that after a while. It just becomes normal to us and we just
Give them the keys to the house
so I
believe that
Rommel plays a very valuable part in this TV show so
therefore I predict Rommel making it all the way to the end and
Playing his part if this is a country where they're trying to normalize
You know or try to break down Islam the TV show, but I believe these guys will get to the final
And then when I go through the show and I have a look the other contestants. I thought what type of
Australian people would be the best
and the the best type of Aussies that the 1% would want would definitely be a couple of
Aussie guys that don't really ask any questions they just smile and they're happy-go-lucky and they they don't they don't talk about
Politics they don't think about the world too much. They don't
They just finish work. Come home have a few beers
Play cricket on the weekend
We just gone through a summer of cricket. It's the most popular sport throughout summer in Australia is that that is cricket. I
Thought that's what the establishment wants. They just want sheep
They want cattle that they can just herd around Australia that don't ask too many questions. They don't want to riot
They don't want to get out their yellow vests. They're the perfect type of human
Cattle not human capital human cattle and who fits the mold the best the cricketers?
This is two guys Matt and Luke
One guys, super short, they both just constantly have a smile on their face all the time
And when you look at their opening preview little video
They kind of do fit the mold of those two guys from Newcastle that don't really ask any questions
They're like don't worry about who's going to win the election. Don't worry about China
Don't worry about anything some few beers on the weekend. We're playing some cricket. She'll be right, mate
Don't worry about don't worry about retirement or anything. I think these guys would be perfect to win
the cricketers are the ideal cattle and
Rommel plays a part of
Moderating the is the Muslim population if they happen to watch My Kitchen Rules
So these are the psychological tricks
That the mainstream media play the the establishment
Plays who control the mainstream media and the TV shows I could also have a close
look at say neighbours and Home & Away and all those other type of
Australian homegrown TV shows and Bret them down as well
They're so
Blatantly obvious. You can see how it's going to play out
before the show even
before the show even airs, so
If you're going to watch My Kitchen Rules
Share them this video
I probably will be wrong, but
if I was the establishment the 1% that controlled Australia and I had
To I was able to manipulate this TV show
This is how I would have it play out
That's what I'm saying so I could be wrong. I could be wrong
I also could be wrong that Rommels gay and I also could be wrong that the cricketers
dumb cattle they could be geniuses for all I know and
Rommel might not be gay and
The establishment might not many people
Aiding My Kitchen Rules
Which is kind of outrageous when you really think about it
but in fact
this is how
The 1% controlled the world. They manipulate you they they use psychological tricks and
You don't even notice that it's happening in
Keep in mind, you know, you tell a lie. Once that's a lie
You tell a lie a thousand times it becomes the truth. And if you are watching the mainstream media for free and
You are getting your news from them for free
You are the product if you're watching a TV show like my kitchen rules for free
You are the product
You see and if the mainstream media promotes
anybody
You know, they are being controlled and they choose them
They don't choose them the 1% chooses them. So this is how it all plays out in
This is just my opinion and I thought this would be an interesting video to make it's a little bit outrageous
I totally get it if you think I'm a total idiot, that's fine
But I guess
If it is to play out the way that I believe it will play out
Maybe I'm not an idiot Hey, and then you got something
outrageous to think about in the future and I guess when this show finishes and we find out who gets the
To the final and who actually ultimately wins My Kitchen Rules this year
Then we'll find out who the real idiot is won't we?
I left my heart to the severs Roth case and
The hammer saw
Wasabi to cigarettes to the black of Markham and I have to be out now cold turkey
But from the ocean to the Silver City
And that's only either way, it's good
understand
About love of God and acts and guarantees
I'll ever know be they heroes but back in
97 and free and happy sailing the save me Harvard
Assault of about a kid who kiss her and she was landing
-------------------------------------------
Israelis: Wouldn't Israel be more democratic if it wasn't defined as Jewish? - Duration: 14:29.
Would Israel be more democratic if it wasn't defined as a Jewish state?
Pavel Ramat Gan
Not an easy question
What is your gut feeling?
I don't think there is any pure democratic state
in the world
and of course not in Israel
We are not in a pure democratic state
If it's going to be more democratic, maybe
If it's going to be....
more rights for Jewish people
then maybe less
So it depends on
The fact that Israel is called "the Jewish state"
does that mean it is less democratic
that's the claim here
That by defining yourself as a state for a people
what about the others who are not
What about the other in Germany?
who are not
Christians
Does Germany define itself as a Christian state? (German visitor next to me)
Yes, it does
So it depends on
What about other countries?
That is true, exactly
Sweden does, England does
Japan does
People define ....
Maybe what is good for one country
another one has a right to decide or not
It is our decision of the country to do it
but it's not one sided
thing from my point of view
Would Israel be more democratic
if it wasn't defined as a Jewish state?
Ayelet Jaffa
Difficult question
It's not difficult
If we are democratic, we are democratic
If we want to change to be...
If we are a democratic Jewish country
then the democracy gets a little harmed
How? Give an example
The fact that it is not a country for all it's citizens
and I support the Nation State Law
You support the law?
Yes, I support the Nation State Law
It's a contradiction
No, it's not
If you look at in cold rational
looking at it objectively
then yes, it harms democracy
but as a Jew
what we went through as a nation
because we are Jews
it seems we need a state with a national self-definition
because we tried
living around the world and it didn't work
We need that here
and that definition is important
Would Israel be more democratic
if it wasn't defined as a Jewish state?
Meaning, according to the person asking
the fact that Israel is defined as a Jewish state
it cannot be democratic
or less democratic
Omer Rehovot
The country could be more democratic if it wasn't a Jewish state
in my opinion
How?
Explain what you are thinking in your mind
Examples
If there will be less
laws committed to religion
so then the country will be freer
Give an example of something that is committed by religion
For example, the closing of businesses on Shabbat
It is now Shabbat and everything is open here
True
But this is Tel Aviv and it depends on the area
In most places, you have to close for Shabbat
Yes
You heard the question
Peleg Tel Aviv
Would Israel be more democratic
if not defined as Jewish
In my view it would not be more democratic if not defined Jewish
and I will tell you why
Democracy means that decisions are determined by the majority
Right?
Meaning, if I have
50 Muslims
49 Muslims and 51 Jews
then it is decided by the 51 and not the 49
also if it was the opposite
If there was a majority of Muslims here
so things would be determined by the Muslims
There is democracy here
There are Arab members of parliament
that sit in the parliament
No one.... - The Joint List
There is the Joint List (Arab political party)
which is part of the government
whoever wants, we accept them with open arms
There are those who like that less
but what can you do Democracy is the majority
and I don't think it is connected to whether it is Jewish or not
But there is also the issue
that in a democracy, you must also protect minorities
So I am a Jew in Canada
True, we are only 0.5% of the population
My rights must also be protected
because I am part of the society
Do you have your rights in Canada?
Yes, 99% and I can give an example where they didn't
We...
Not completely, even in Canada
Anyone who is a citizen of the state of Israel
those who have a blue ID card
has the same rights as all the citizens
There is no citizen here that has less rights
If there is someone
who born into a more difficult reality
and his life is a little more difficult
that's up to him
I don't see here any difference
Every citizen receives the same rights
Would Israel be more democratic
if it wasn't defined as a Jewish state?
Haifa
No, no
Not a question for us
Not for you? - No
Good luck and sorry
Yaniv Tel Aviv
Don't you think Israel would be more democratic
if it weren't defined as a Jewish state?
No, I don't think so
I think Israel has to be a democratic country
but a Jewish country
first and foremost
But why isn't
there a contradiction between them
People say that if it is Jewish then it cannot be democratic
Is that true?
No
Why?
Because they can go together Look, we are a democratic country
residents vote
the government is led by the residents
and it is still a Jewish country
It is a mix. It is even written in the Declaration of Independence
"Jewish and Democratic state"
Ok but it isn't written that the country is democratic
in the Declaration of Indepenence
What is written?
Jewish
Actually, yes
If I am remembering correctly
Secondly
Arabs (in Israel) say that for them it is not democratic
Because it is not an Arab country
it is a Jewish country
But Arabs live here
No problem but it is written "Jewish state"
So then first it must be a Jewish country
and then after, a country...
But isn't that
not fair
If you lived as a Jew in another place
No problem. There are over 40 countries for Arabs
and they can go wherever they want
starting with Saudi Arabia, Egypt Lebanon, Jordan, Syria
They are surrounded by countries
We have one country
The country of Israel
so it is defined as the Jewish country
If I had 40 countries I could go to
then I would agree with you
Tamar and Omer Tel Aviv
Do you think Israel would be more democratic if not defined as Jewish?
Wow, heavy question
I have to think about it
You dropping that kind of question on people?
What do your feelings tell you?
Is it true or not?
I think
Israel is one of the most democratic countries
Democratic? - Yes
When comparing to what's around us then yes, completely
no matter what some say
Yes
What do you think?
What do you have to say?
I also think it is a democratic country
even though it is Jewish
and the Jewish character is important to the country
But there is also room for
there shouldn't be religious coercion
Everyone should decide for himself
There is free speech here
even with what they say in the media there is the full right to free speech
We hear all sides
Whoever wants and believes
can find a wide spectrum of opinions
there is no silencing or concealing anyone in my view
That's it
But wouldn't it be more democratic
if it wasn't defined
As a Jewish country? - Yes
Jewish religious or Jewish?
Jewish, not religious
You're leading the witness
The person asking the question is leading the witness, true
So reply
I think it is hard to say
If it wasn't defined as a Jewish country?
Let's say you were a minority Muslim Arabs
that live here
would you feel differently?
Are there rights you don't get?
You are going into the Nation State Law
Not a good idea
No, I am not going into that
That is something else
Israel in it's character is a Jewish country
There is room here for all religions and we respect everyone
and we give rights for most
for those that due of course
I don't think here there is any...
I don't think there would be any difference
if Israel was defined as Jewish or multi national
I don't think so
I think that is what is
There is room for everyone here
I think in the end we all live well here
Aviram Holon
Don't you think Israel would be more democratic
if it wasn't defined as a Jewish state?
In the Declaration of Independence of the state of Israel
it states that Israel is a Jewish state
nothing written about democracy only the values of democracy
So it follows that the country should be Jewish and not democratic
which means
keeping rights for the Jews
as part of law
which currently a declarative law has no actual validity
has no what?
Actual validity
Wait, this isn't exactly about that law
If you had to decide between democracy and Judaism...
Judaism
There are many democratic countries There is only one Jewish country
But there are people who are not Jewish who live here
True, and we respect them and we protect their rights
But you gave the example
if it is between rights of an Arab, Muslim, Christian, Druze
or a Jew
we would then choose Jews
True but
we need to find the mix
between protecting rights and a Jewish state
I think that things now the status quo
works perfectly
and it is really good for the situation now
Also the Nation State law we should have had long ago
especially as a basic law
Ita Vered Yericho (West Bank settlement)
Wouldn't Israel be more democratic
if not defined as the Jewish state?
I don't know what democracy means exactly
I know that there is
a right for every human being that was born in this world
to exist and receive clean land
clean water
clean air
It doesn't matter if you are Jewish or anything else
and yes, the Jews have a right
to be connected in the chain of their forefathers
like not asking from the North American Indians
to give up the customs of their forefathers
so also, don't ask the Jews to give up their forefather's customs
True, there are many Jews in global industries
That doesn't mean
that the Jews are responsible for global conspiracies
that destroy humanity and the globe
Their are powers that want this I don't know who is behind them
maybe there are many Jews that work in this
There are also many other people that work in this
Democracy is in danger around the world
not only in Israel
Democracy is also in danger in America
in France
which was the first republic in the world
We can
take care and keep the Earth
to preserve it
to be connected to all the creations that exist here
without harming their individual rights
without giving up on the ancient traditions
to the offspring that are from here
and yes, the Jew's history is here
We have a right to exist in this world
like the right of all 70 nations that exist (Tower of Babel reference)
hearts of the cultures that exist
to keep their language
to keep the secrets of the medicines, the plants
to keep the traditions and the songs
and the spirit
There is one unity in the world
It doesn't matter what name you give
your god or not your god
We don't need a hostile control
not from the right, not from the left
especially not from the corporations
We need
that all the money in the world
will go
to preserve the earth
and the people on it
as a chain We are a virus
for a harmonious world
Instead of searching for solutions in space
how we will live on another planet
all that money can save human beings
and the earth
there are enough resources
on the entire planet
to keep billions of people
Thank you
-------------------------------------------
Insane Photos That Show How Insanely Cold It Is In America Right Now - Duration: 10:03.
Insane Photos That Show How Insanely Cold It Is In America Right Now
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét