Thứ Sáu, 25 tháng 8, 2017

Youtube daily as Aug 25 2017

I'm always thinking of you

even on days we don't meet, every time I feel.

Ah, the warmth of your palm

envelopes me, Heart & Soul.

I'll be here, never leaving your side.

Your casual gentleness every time we meet

makes me feel like embracing every part of you

I will be as one, I want to protect you.

Stay with me. I love you, yes you, my beloved.

All my feelings laid bare to you.

A once in a lifetime miracle meeting

where as if the stars were all sparkling and the raindrops soon poured into the sea.

Let's be intertwined, the two of us. Love, you are everything.

For more infomation >> Be As One Elsword - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Hollyoaks' Neeta and Hunter get caught out as Prince records evidence of their affair - Duration: 3:21.

Hollyoaks' Neeta and Hunter get caught out as Prince records evidence of their affair

Hollyoaks Neeta Kaur could be in huge trouble next week as Prince McQueen discovers that shes having an affair.

Neeta has been cheating on her partner Mac Nightingale with Princes twin brother Hunter ever since they went on holiday to Ibiza together earlier this summer.

As secrets can never stay under wraps in the village for too long, Hollyoaks fans should brace themselves for some huge episodes over the next few days as Neeta finally slips up.

It all starts when moody Mac wrongly blames Prince (Malique Thompson Dwyer) for money going missing at The Dog In The Pond.

True to form, Prince decides that he wants revenge against the pub boss and he hits the jackpot when he overhears Neeta on the phone arranging a date with someone who clearly isnt Mac.

Prince decides to record the incriminating conversation, completely oblivious to the fact that Hunter is her mystery man. What will Prince do with this juicy evidence? Could he be about to mess up badly by inadvertently putting Hunter in Macs bad books?.

Amrit Maghera, who plays Neeta, revealed: A lot happens next week. We just get deeper and deeper into the love triangle, as Neeta lies to Mac saying she cant go to Liverpool for Alfies birthday.

Instead, she heads off in Macs sports car to Beeston with Hunter. Before they go, Mac accuses Prince of stealing money from the till, which Neeta has actually stolen for Hunter to go to Edinburgh for a college interview.

Prince is fuming and plans to deface The Dog windows, but when he goes to do so, he hears Neeta on the phone and knows shes having an affair. He records the conversation, ready to expose her.

Neeta and Hunter have no idea and are planning a life together in Edinburgh when Hunter gets the offer, but youll have to wait and see if their secret is exposed.

She continued: If the truth came out, this would mean the end of the world for Neeta.

She could lose her job, her family, she could be sent to prison – it would be a complete shut down on her life. Its crazy shes taking such a big risk, considering shes so loyal most of the time.

She knows Mac has a violent past. Its even been something thats caused them to split up before and he has accidentally hit her before in the past.

She would be absolutely terrified if he found out, but she doesnt think there is a possibility of this at all, because she believes shes covered all her tracks so far..

Theo Graham, who plays Hunter, also warned that Princes unpredictable nature means that anything is possible next week.

For more infomation >> Hollyoaks' Neeta and Hunter get caught out as Prince records evidence of their affair - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

How Does The Civil War Qualify as the First Modern War? - Duration: 1:36:58.

Okay, welcome, this is the last lecture of the winter lecture series.

Thank you for being here, and how many of you were here to hear James Hessler speaking

today?

Isn't it wonderful that you come to Gettysburg National Military Park and do seminars throughout

the day like this, and your tax dollars at work?

Yeah, okay.

Well, thank you for being here and this will be the last one.

Of course, here in the park internally, we think in the park of tomorrow as a big day,

March 12th, because we get to wear our summer uniforms.

So, you all didn't know that, so symbolically is the ending of the winter and passing onto

the Spring.

But, today we are going to talk about the Civil War as the 1st Modern War.

And, I've got some broad points to make, contextual points to make, to try to put the

war itself into context in world history.

And, then I have a lot of detail stories that have to do with the actual modernization of

the war.

We will look at newfangled weaponry, and those kinds-of things.

So, now we start with big picture.

You always want to answer the "why and so what?"

questions when you are doing history.

So, let's start with the big questions and the big points.

You know, how can the Civil War be the 1st Modern War?

What context do we have to consider it's the 1st Modern War?

Well, in the broader context of the Renaissance it does?

For fifteen years, I taught at Harrisburg Area Community College, in the history department,

I taught credit courses in the evening, while working here by day.

I would work there by evening.

This would be a point that I would make over several weeks, so we will kind-of create a

quick outline, kind-of a bullet list of how the 19th century, and how the American Civil

War comes to be, which is really the first modern century and the 1st Modern War.

We start with the Renaissance.

The Renaissance is from about 1400-1600 AD.

And, when you think of Renaissance, you think of Leonardo Da Vinci, Michael Angelo, and

Rafael and Botticelli, and some of the artist, and how they brought three dimension to their

sculptures and paintings.

You also think of the humanist writers, of which we think of Chaucer and his Canterbury

Tales.

We also think about Shakespeare.

There are a number of famous writers that come out of that Renaissance period, such

as Machiavelli, who is part of that same milieu.

And, the Renaissance was a, it literally means a new birth, or reborn.

It's the idea that the Middle Ages were starting to give way to culture again.

The Renaissance prided itself, those who helped shape the Renaissance, they prided themselves

in linking themselves back in antiquity with Ancient Rome, and Ancient Greece and Ancient

Egypt.

And, they wanted to forget that middle period, the Middle Ages where culture went backwards.

So, the Renaissance fueled Humanism.

Humanism recognizes human potential and that became the spark or seed for the movements

that would follow as in the Science Revolution, which would be the next major movement.

When you think of Science Revolution, you think of Galileo, you think of Tycho Brahe,

you think of Isaac Newton.

And, they tried to scientifically explain the heavens.

They tried to mathematically come up with equations, and quadrants, and calculus, and

all of that was invented in the 1600s and 1700s to try to explain the universe in logical,

mathematical terms.

This was an attempt to deliberately reject the superstition of the Middle Ages.

Astrology was giving way to, "let science typically explain what we see in the sky."

So, the Renaissance sparked that with it Humanist Movement, then the Science Revolution, and

then the Enlightenment.

And, the Enlightenment, you heard the names Locke, Rousseau, Voltaire, Diderot, Hume,

Bacon and Thomas Jefferson.

These were individuals who said, "okay, if the Isaac Newton's of the world can explain

the universe scientifically, let's explain human needs, human government scientifically.

And, so they came-up with political science.

I used to work at Independence Hall in Philadelphia in the 1980s as a ranger, and gave tours there

where the Declaration and the Constitution were both written and signed.

And, the story there is our founding fathers wanted to apply science to human behavior.

Our constitution was written scientifically to try to rule out monarchies, dictatorships,

to try to bring balance to government, to try to create a more perfect union.

And, in that same tradition, you people like Frederick the Great, and Napoleon and their

disciples come along, and write about the military in a scientific way.

So, by the middle 1700s, and into the early 1800s, you these books called the Art of War

that would try to scientifically explain in formulas, not unlike Newton and Galileo trying

to explain the universe mathematically, you had people like Antoine-Henri Jomini, and

others writing formulas.

Napoleon's Maxims did the same with the idea that if you are going to make a direct

frontal assault, you should have a 3-1 ratio over the defender whom you're attacking

if you want to carry the position.

Those are the kind-of things they thought about.

If you divide your forces in the face of an enemy, you can be defeated in detail, and

those kinds-of things.

So, they thought scientifically about the military.

And, so industrialization is kind-of the book end on this discussion about the Renaissance

starting the thought-process of science.

Industrialization became the application of science to everyday life, and we are going

to see some of those industrial breakthroughs as we go along today.

Industrialization became the practical application of science to human affairs to human government.

And, Max Weber who you see there on your right, and Karl Marx on your left, we're not necessarily

fans of theirs, not fans of them, but if we are going to talk about what is a modern war,

then we have to acknowledge these two philosophers and writers, in the 19th century, defined

the notion of what is a pre-modern world versus a modern world and a post-modern world.

Now, pre-modern – now there's a long definition if you were to go back to Communist Manifesto,

but the short of it is pre-modern has to do with agriculture, it has to do with energy

sources related to wind power, water power, literal horse power, human power.

And, that's the way of the world for most of history, history has been pre-modern.

But, then the steam engine was patented by James Watt in 1781, which set in motion a

modern world.

We'll see that the application of steam just changed the world.

It's not unlike President Clinton signing legislation in 1996 that commercialized the

internet.

It went from an internal thing used by the government to suddenly commercialize.

And, the day that was signed, all malls were dead.

And, we did not know it yet, we had to wait and watch that play-out.

The Walmart's and Targets of the world are still reeling from that signature.

That's how technology works.

The modern era would be the 19th century.

And, we will define it as we go along, in passing about post-modernism.

Post-modernism is a theory that certain economic historians hold onto that eventually there

will come a time when nationalism, when competitions between nations, including imperialism, colonialism,

religious zealously, all will eventually give way to a global world where everyone sort-of

blends together.

Post-modernism is controversial, but that's been foretold and predicted by philosophers

in some look to it as a reality.

Okay, so the Civil War falls within that broader context of the Renaissance to these various

movements up to the point of Industrialization thanks to the steam engine.

And, so let's look at how the North was modernizing on the eve of the Civil War.

You are looking at a picture or lithograph of Frederic Jones Shoes from the 1850s.

There were over 1,300 shoe factories in Massachusetts in 1860, with 60,000 plus employees in Massachusetts

involved in shoes.

A few years ago, I got a chance to speak in Lynn, Massachusetts at the GAR Hall there.

And, it's a wonderful visit if you get a chance to go, and they took me to the Lynn

shoe factory.

Well, some of those buildings are gone now, they took me to the district where the original

buildings were.

Lynn, Massachusetts was also a major producer of shoes, producing shoes for Civil War soldiers.

So, contracts for the Union armies looked to factories like Frederick Jones, and looked

to factories like the one in Lynn.

So, the North was industrializing, that's industrialization, which is the outgrowth

of science applied to political economies.

Also, the North was becoming modernized through other examples such as McCormick Reapers.

Here's a picture of McCormick Reapers in 1847.

McCormick Reaper was to the West and to wheat, Midwest in wheat production, what the cotton

gin was to the South and cotton production.

It revolutionized the West to be the breadbasket of the country, and some cases, the whole

world.

The McCormick Reaper, it's a complex machine that pull-in grains and it would cut-down

on the laborious aspects of gathering wheat.

By 1853, the North was modernizing in yet other ways through the Singer Sewing Factory.

And, so Singer Sewing machines allowed for textile mills to produce even more, because

now you had these sewing machines.

And, there would be a room where all these sewing machines were set-up, there was a peddle

you would press, that's how you powered it.

How many of you remember that, it's okay?

There were also steam powered ones as well connected through pulley systems and belts.

Connecticut Clocks, this is a picture of such clock factory in New Haven, Connecticut in

the 1840s.

So, Connecticut was known for clocks, just like Massachusetts was known for shoes.

Lowell Mills by 1850 had converted from water power to steam power.

And, they were producing textiles, you know, in a major way.

The Springfield Armory also represents industrialization and modernization in that within the Springfield

Armory they were using jigs, fixtures, gages, templates to replicate parts in such a way

where you could make interchangeable parts.

That's important to note.

In the late 1980s, I worked for two years at Valley Forge National Military Park, and

my role was to wear a tricorn hat, and sit around a campfire on weekends for two years

and I was stuck in the year 1777-1778.

But, as I did that, in that time period the Brown Bess and Charleville muskets that they

carried into battle, if they were damaged, they were only used from that point on as

corduroy for the roads.

You couldn't do anything with them, because they were made by a gunsmith by hand, and

the parts were not interchangeable.

By the time of the Civil War, thanks to Springfield Armory, and Harpers Ferry Armory, you had

these machines that could replicate parts.

When you read accounts sometimes of the Battle of Gettysburg, and the immediate aftermath,

you read of Union contingents, regiments going around the battlefield with horse and carriage,

picking-up rifles and throwing them in the back of a wagon.

And, what are they doing?

They are sending them back to Springfield to be reconditioned, because you could just

replace parts and use them again.

When I worked in Appomattox in 1984, one of the points we would make there, people would

ask, "This is where the Confederates surrendered, this is where the Confederates gave-up all

their weapons, where are those weapons?"

I suppose it was kind-of silly, but the Confederates worried that if they surrendered their weapons,

they would be used against them by other Union forces combating other Confederate forces

still in resistance from Virginia through North Carolina all the way to Texas.

And, so there were some Confederates who buried their rifles, and those sort-of things still

turn-up today.

There are stories of complete cannons being buried.

And, it's silly because the North had more than enough.

They took the Confederates weapons that they gathered at the surrender and used them for

corduroy in the route back to Washington, as their armies marched back to a victory

celebration in Washington D.C.

But, the Springfield Armory then represents industrialization, modernization.

And, if you study the history of technology, armory in Springfield is really important,

because it represents the introduction of interchangeable parts.

Singer Sewing machine, there were interchangeable parts there too, but they had to do some filing

to make things fit better.

The first fully assembled devices that you could buy were Western Bycycles in the 1890s.

And, then Henry Ford perfected it with the Model-T in 1914 with full assembly.

Once you have full assembly, it was sort-of the end of the craft tradition, which is tragic

and sad.

I suppose from a technology perspective, though, it represents the fulfillment of what Springfield

Armory started.

The North was modernizing too economically.

Banks were starting to appear all throughout the North.

I should say this in the way of background.

If you were to travel back to 1810s, 1820s, there were virtually no banks.

There was a National Bank, and there were some Wildcat Banks in the 1830s that printed

their own money, or depended on loans from state banks.

But, banks were very limited, because there was not a lot of capital in this country.

If you really wanted a loan, let's say to buy expensive material to build a railroad,

you had to either a loan from Great Britain, or you took a loan from a merchant who would

dock in New York Harbor, for instance, or Charleston.

And so, money was handled not through banks but merchants.

Well, that was changing by the 1850s.

There was more and more money being generated by industrialization in the North.

So, you had banks, Wall Street came into existence.

In Chicago, they had their Union Stockyard by 1865, but that was on the heels of having

produced three times more Civil War beef, over 100,000 beef per year produced for the

Union armies, during the war.

So then, Chicago as the war was ending, went ahead and opened their stock exchange.

Telegraphs helped stock markets come into existence.

Why?

It is because, knowledge is power.

If you can get information on an incredible crop, let's say out in the Midwest, an incredible

bounty of wheat, and you know about it, and you're living in New York City, you can

buy it by telegraph, because you got the news by telegraph.

You buy it before anyone else, and then you sell it at higher shares to everyone else

and make a profit.

So, the telegraph went hand-in-hand with the stock market.

The North was modernizing.

I think I mentioned this to Larry the other day, because Larry and I have these good discussions,

about the Erie Canal.

Occasionally in the classroom this provocative point is made that the Civil War would not

have been fought without construction of the Erie Canal.

And, when it was completed in 1825, it linked the Hudson with Lake Erie, which linked New

York through Lake Erie to the Midwest, and specifically more-so than any other place,

Chicago.

But, you know, the Midwest today we consider to be Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota

and Ohio.

We would consider those the Midwest states.

Those states prior to the Erie Canal's construction were economically connected with St. Louis,

New Orleans and the Gulf via what body of water?

It was the Mississippi.

And so, the Erie Canal, the argument goes, connected the Midwest economically with the

Northeast, and then rail just reinforced that.

And, then once those economic connections were rearranged, then eventually there were

political alignments that went along with that.

So, sectionalism, which is a major cause of the Civil War, where the South and North were

virtually not speaking and not trading, the Erie Canal played a role in that.

But, it's all part of pulling the North together toward modernization.

And, then rail would eventually just reinforce all of that.

So, the stage was set for the 1st Modern War.

You had steam ships, steam trains, steam factories and so-on.

So, now we are moving from the very broad to the very specific now.

And, we are going to talk about, let's start with balloons.

And, I am going to tell a lot of stories.

I love telling stories, and narratives are fun, but they are meaningful stories, and

they help make the point.

One of the mediums, or lenses that we look at the past through is through people.

You know, great events, great men, great women.

But then, if we refine the great men and great women lens to look at the past through, there's

also conflict between men and men, women and women.

That's a major theme all throughout history.

Envies and jealousies and conflict, it goes on-and-on, and competition.

Thaddeus Lowe and John La Mountain, both had the desire to be the chief contractor for

balloons in the Union army.

And so, they would not only approach the Army of the Potomac, but they would approach officials

in Washington and make their bid to be the supplier of balloons.

And, before I move on, let me say something about how aero pilots were received back then.

Aero pilots, or balloon pilots, if you will, were seen in the armies as eccentric people.

They were seen, they dressed a little different, they carried sextants in their hand, you know

this instruments for measurement, they carried these bulky contraptions, these hydrogen inflators

and they had wagons.

And, they had titles that gave them status, but the average soldier never acknowledged

them as official military.

So, chains of command were always precarious trying to work through the contracted balloonist.

And, I will make a broader point about that.

Some of you have been out there with me on my Samuel Johnston walk.

And, he did the reconnaissance for General Longstreet's attack on the Union left, the

Round Tops and Wheatfield and that part of the battlefield.

And, you know that Samuel Johnston, there were problems after the war when Confederate

veterans corresponded with him, about exactly what he was doing, and did he make it to Little

Round Top, and could he have made it to Little Round Top?

And, seeing what he saw, or not seeing what he saw – some of you know that story real

well, -- well, one the problems with Samuel Johnston, in the Army of Northern Virginia,

is that he would be considered an outsider, not unlike the balloonist.

"This eccentric subcontractor that was brought in, he was not official army, and we don't

know if we should listen to him or not.

He didn't go to West Point, and he doesn't wear our uniform, and we are not sure where

he falls into our order."

The average soldier would have walked past both of these individuals and looked at them,

you know, strangely.

Thaddeus Lowe eventually got the primary contract.

He would send-up balloons not only along the Rappahannock River, but the Rapidan, and he

would keep a constant eye on the Confederates.

But, he would send-up his balloon in other places in Virginia, depending on where the

armies moved.

And, the Intrepid is synonymous with Thaddeus S.D.

Lowe.

Now, the Intrepid, one incident involving it was that it was captured in a flight from

Cincinnati to Charleston.

It just so happened to land right after the firing on Fort Sumter.

That's really bad timing isn't it?

And, so after some explanations and official letters, the Confederates let him go, and

he made it back North again.

But, I mention that story because that story spread throughout the South, and it also spread

throughout portions of the Union army as well, and so it just added towards the mistrust

that the average soldier had toward an aero pilot.

"Here's an individual that floated off-course it seems like several hundred miles," or

that's how the story evolved.

The average soldier also looked at the balloonist in the light of going to a county fair or

carnival.

They would go there, and they would have the balloon ride.

Have you ever taken a balloon ride?

And, you hear the fire blast forth.

I don't know how that sounds on Facebook.

But, the balloon would go-up on a tether, and then you would be able to look across

the countryside.

And, those balloons were a novelty.

And, they seemed to be a carnival act, seemed to be the outgrowth of charlatan-like behavior.

So, the average soldier the average soldier in the ranks did not know what to do with

the aero pilot.

And, okay Thaddeus Lowe did most of the ballooning near Confederate lines.

Notice the contraptions here that I made a reference to, as in the hydrogen or oxygen

tanks that would inflate the balloons.

These balloons were very prop heavy.

And, of course, tethered means you are using a rope or chain to allow the balloon to go-up

to a certain distance.

And, we can see one of the pilots there on his mission.

And, the balloons would be raised to a certain level so that a telegrapher could telegraph

what he saw from this bird's-eye perspective.

And, the telegrapher would have cartographer ability, so they would map-make.

I suppose the equivalent today would be Google Earth.

But, they would be high above, and they – You know, there was a point just before the Gettysburg

Campaign where Thaddeus Lowe would have had upwards of seven balloons, tethered above

the Rappahannock, watching the Confederate movements south of the Rappahannock, all throughout

the day, and watching their campfires at night.

And, so when General Lee stole a march to come North, you may not know this, but as

he moved North, around the federal right flank, into the Shenandoah-Cumberland Valley – again

going North up-through Maryland into Pennsylvania – as he did that, the Confederates left

a lot of campfires burning to keep the balloonists unsuspicious of the flanking maneuver that

was occurring.

Other ways the Confederates tried to fool the balloonists, the aero pilot, is they tried

to cut down trees to the trunk and then paint the trunks black so they looked like artillery

pieces from the sky.

This was very precise as we talk about the 1st Modern War, the balloonist on a tether,

could save a lot of running around, and a lot of wasted time and energy.

If they spotted what looked like Confederate movements of cavalry or infantry, the aero

pilot could make a precise reading, and that would allow him to telegraph that to the ground,

and that would allow a commander to send out a precise amount of cavalry to check-it-out,

to debunk it, or to affirm it.

This is the George Washington Parke Custis floating from a coal barge on the Potomac

early in the war.

This would be considered, along with the Teaser – some of you know that the Confederates

had a barge like this that floated up and down the James River, during the Peninsula

Campaign, in May and June of 1862.

And, a balloon was connected to a barge so that McClellan could be studied from the air.

Do you know who the pilot was in that one Confederate balloon?

It was Edward Porter Alexander, who commanded artillery for Pickett's Charge here.

So, he would have been one of those eccentric people that somehow eventually fit-in.

But, the balloon being pulled along the barge has caused modern technology historians to

say these were the first examples of modern aircraft carriers.

So, there you go, okay.

Okay, and then you have – notice I'm jumping around to different themes, the broader theme

is the Science Revolution which leads to Industrialization, which leads to the 1st Modern War.

But, there are some other themes going on, just underneath that, and this one, or one

of those is personalities, and how they come into play.

And, so here we see Joseph Henry and Samuel F.B. Morse.

And, when you think of them, you immediately think of Morse Code and you think of the telegraph.

Joseph Henry was working with electromagnetism, and impulses that were communicated in a telegraph

fashion before Morse, and he inspired Morse.

But, as is often the case, one person gets the credit, and there are others who are discovered

a little bit later.

Thomas Edison wasn't the only person who ever worked with electricity.

Have you heard of Nicholas Tesla?

Alright, but only recently is Tesla getting his due, though it took over a century.

It's usually one person who beats the others to the patent office.

That allows me to make this point, this broader contextual point.

That is, if you go back and do a little research when the program is over, go online and check,

"how many patents were there in the 19th century filed to the government in Washington

D.C?"

And, it's thousands.

Everyone became their own personal inventor.

You read, I mean there was this incredible fascination with science.

And, so this is a really good broader contextual point.

If you read diaries and memoirs, let me stick with diaries in particular, if you read diaries

of the 19th century, oftentimes the person keeping the diary starts-out every morning

with the weather and temperature.

They will go outside and record those things, they thought of themselves as their own personal

scientist.

In the early 1920s, people buy their own radio kits and buy their own radio.

They thought of themselves as scientific doing that.

So, there was this fascination with the Renaissance and carried all the way up, even unto this

present day.

As I hold this device in front of you, it's a modern version of what we're about to

talk about.

Okay, and so in the field, the telegraph wires were called the grapevine.

Have you heard that expression, I heard it through the grapevine?

That's where it comes from.

And, the grapevine connected for the first time, we're talking about the 1st Modern

War, for the first time in history, divisional headquarters and corps headquarters were connected

by wire, so that there was communication within the lines.

And, I'm thinking of Frank O'Reilly's excellent on the Battle of Fredericksburg.

You all know that about that book.

One of his arguments is that the main attack, or what we think of as the main attack at

Fredericksburg, involving Burnside's repeated, seemingly futile attacks against Marye's

Heights, and the stone wall, Frank argues those were not the main attacks.

Those were the diversionary attacks.

And that Burnside kept ordering them over and over and over, not out of futility, but

to try to give William Franklin a chance on his left to coordinate, turn the Confederate

right flank, cut them off from Richmond, cut-off their water supply along the Rappahannock,

and cut-off the road to Richmond from Fredericksburg.

It is an intelligent argument isn't it?

Very, very good argument, and in any case, he's a good friend of mine, very, very smart

book.

But, one of the points that Frank makes is that Burnside set-up wires to Franklin, so

that his subordinates, Reynolds and Meade would make their attack against Jackson's

portion of the line at the right time.

That is, Burnside set-up the grapevine to connect the main attack with Franklin, the

diversionary attack of Burnside against Marye's Heights, and that Franklin never hooked-up

the wire and made the connection.

Okay, and that Burnside, when he was brought before the Committee on the Conduct of War

in Washington, the congressional hearings, he was the gentleman, took the blame himself

and never put the blame on Franklin.

I should say something technical, because when you are doing technology history, we

have to bring-in some of the technical aspects too.

Impulses, okay, so through electromagnetism you have impulses, they were transmitted through

copper.

Copper could easily break, so you had the option of transmitting these signals through

iron, but iron is not a good conductor, so what these soldiers or telegraphers were doing,

in the field by the 1860s, is they would wrap copper around the iron to get the best of

both worlds.

And, then wrapping them both up in cloth, putting them underground.

Well, the problem with that is the cloth deteriorated and eventually it affected the connection,

because there would be corrosive qualities with the copper.

So, it led to what we look at is telephone poles.

So, that's why that comes into existence.

Telegraph typically followed rail lines because the right-of-way was already cleared with

the rail line.

You know how today there will be wires that you see riding down along the highway, and

you'll look to the top of the hill and there's high-wire cables extending all the way up?

There are these magnificient towers and a clearing in the woods that go all the way

up to the top.

But, also if you look carefully, you'll see cell phone towers in that same space.

And, the reason is because the utility company already has a right-of-way, which if you're

a cell phone company, you use that right-of-way and you don't have to invent the wheel all

over again, getting permissions across private property.

The same is true with the telegraph.

The telegraph ran along rail, because that was already circumvented through peoples'

properties.

Also, rail followed the shortest distance between two points.

Roads will meander.

Rail tends to go very straight.

And, then rail is a good plumb bob or chalk line to guide on.

Armies tended to follow rail, because they knew that if they looked on a map and followed

rail, it would always lead them to where they were going.

It was an axis they could trust.

Notice I have the letters LOC that stands for lines of communication.

That's a military term.

Lines of communication also include lines of supply.

If you are advancing, along a rail line, not only can you control the rail, and protect

it, but you have communications the whole way.

Communications mean supply trains are coming-up, as well as control of the telegraph.

So, telegraph would follow rail.

Armies tended to march along rail.

It's not a coincidence that Robert E. Lee's Army followed the Cumberland Valley Rail Line,

and that Stuart's cavalry followed the Northern Central Rail Line to try and meet them in

Carlisle.

There's a rail line the whole way.

So, the rail line would dictate a lot of those things.

And, then as we continue to talk about the 1st Modern War, now look at the clock, the

time is just running away from me here.

But, there were two companies that were private companies that immediately helped out the

armies.

One was the American Telegraph Company, the other the Western Telegraph.

The American Telegraph was preferred early-on by the Union Army, but the trouble with the

American Telegraph Company was that it ran across sectional lines from North to South.

So, when the war started, something like half their customers were in alien, that is, in

enemy territory.

So, financially American Telegraph did not survive the sectional split.

Western Telegraph survived really all the way up to modern times, and Western Telegraph

still exists.

They ran more laterally, more horizontally East to West, and that helped them survive.

And, then a sub-category under that would be the military telegraph, and the military

telegraph was tied-to a signal flag corps.

And, so let's talk a little about the Signal Corps, and relate that to the telegraph.

Now, let's use a personal example at Little Round Top.

Little Round Top, along with Cemetery Hill and Powers Hill were the three primary signal

flag stations here at Gettysburg.

I imagine most of you knew that.

And, so at any given time, you would see someone standing with a white flag with a red border,

or red flag with white trim, and that flag would be waved from atop Round Top to, let's

say, to a signal station on Cemetery Hill and over to Powers Hill.

The Confederates watched all these signals, by the way, trying to decode them, and were

not able to break the code.

You here coaches sometimes complaining about someone watching their signals on the sideline.

The armies did that during the Civil War too.

But, you would see the flag, for instance, if you were on Cemetery Hill, and you were

looking through your field glasses, from your signal station on Cemetery Hill to the Union

signal station on Little Round Top.

As you looked through your field glasses, and you saw the flag waggle, a couple times

to the right and once forward, you took out your cipher disc and turned it, and that might

be the letter "H" or "L." And, so they were able to communicate through what

is called aerial telegraphy, or semaphore communication.

Now, balloons were not here at Gettysburg.

We talked about balloons.

One reason they were not here is because the Confederates tore-out so much rail, it was

impossible to transport them from Northern Virginia.

Secondly, the battle happened so quickly, relatively speaking after General Lee left

Virginia, that there wasn't time for all federal logistics to catch-up.

The balloons were bulky and they needed rail transportation to be there.

Well, how did the federals compensate here at Gettysburg?

They picked the hilltops that I mentioned so that they could communicate.

That information would be transcribed and then passed to generals and then generals

would communicate.

There was a telegraph station out on Hanover Road near East Cavalry Battlefield.

That was another one.

And, then there was one for a short while on Steven's Knoll, or McKnight's Knoll

next to Culp's Hill.

So, the federals were using those signal stations effectively.

And, so the Confederates were on the outside, the Federals had the interior lines.

So, their communications wouldn't be easily be seen by flag across Union lines.

Can you see that problem, that's another problem with exterior lines.

Now, today that can be overcome through what's called super lateral communications.

Super lateral communication is wireless communication, it's aviation, it's satellite communication,

so you no longer need interior lines to communicate quickly.

You have technological advancements that compensate for all that.

And, you have transportation systems that can take you, let's say, from one side or

the other of an interior position just as fast as if you had interior lines.

Now, the signal station – how do you like my gif there?

I was real proud of that.

And, the signal station on Little Round Top, this is fascinating now, they communicated

with Jack's Mountain, which is about twelve miles west of here, out in the vicinity of

Fairfield and Ski Liberty.

If you know where to look, you can see it from Little Round Top.

On Jack's Mountain, for a while, until the Confederates went up to the top of it on July

3rd, and ran the signal station off, and captured a few.

Prior to that the Jack's Mountain signal station waited for signals that General Meade

wanted to send to Washington D.C.

They would be sent from Little Round Top to Jack's Mountain, from Jack's Mountain

there was a line of sight to Harpers Hill, which is four miles south of Big Round Top.

From Harpers Hill, there was a signal station that had a line of sight to Indian Lookout

Mountain, that would be where Mount Saint Mary's is.

From there, the Western Maryland line did not have telegraph.

Do you all like this kind-of information?

If you want credibility, you want to bring details into a discussion.

There was a group called the Adams Express, and there were twelve horses, and the horses

would run at breakneck speed, even to their death, to a premature death, to carry messages

from Emmitsburg to just north of Baltimore, and from Baltimore along the B&O, telegraph

communications would go all the way from Baltimore to Washington D.C.

By the way, the station where Adams Express would arrive, with the horse from Emmitsburg,

was called Relay Station.

For those who like those kinds-of details, it is just north of Baltimore.

So, theoretically within three hours a message from Little Round Top could reach the White

House.

And, so that is how they compensated with having to fight the battle before all those

grapevines were in place.

Okay, and we are looking at a map that's put out by the census bureau, in concert with

the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, and it's on the Hofstra page.

And, it shows us what rail lines looked like in 1860, and where the greatest populations

were near those rail centers.

Now, it's important as we talk about rail as part of the 1st Modern War to make the

point that the North had a lot more rail than the South did.

Can you see that?

The South typically, if you do a study of Southern railroads, before the Civil War,

the South tended to build rail lines from places like Charlestown, South Carolina, Wilmington,

North Carolina, Savannah, Georgia on an East-West construction, out to somewhere in the Piedmont

region of one of those states, and then it didn't connect to anything.

There were no trunks that they were intentionally connected to.

The North had a problem with their rail lines.

They had trunks.

There was a trunk in Harrisburg, for instance, that brought together several lines, one from

Delaware, one from Philadelphia, one from the Ohio Valley, and then of course, from

the Northern Central that came up from the B&0 at Washington and Baltimore.

But, the North had the problem that there were many different rail companies, and they

were in competition with each other, and they didn't want to unite, and they didn't

want the federal government to control their rates.

They wanted to have their own companies.

So, you had the Northern Central, the B&O, the Cumberland Valley, the Hanover-Gettysburg

line.

They were all, they had different gauge track.

There was so such thing as standard time.

That didn't come about until the 1880s, where there was Eastern, Pacific and Central

time.

That would come later because of some horrific train wrecks.

The rail, then, the problem then in the North was one company would have a line end in a

city like Baltimore, and if you wanted to transfer, there was all this entourage of

people, haulers and carters, that would unpack all of your material from one rail company

and put it on a train of another rail company.

And, that was so you stay overnight in one of their hotels and dine in their restaurants.

So, that's why cities were in collusion with these rail companies.

They wanted people to take time to transfer.

That caused problems during the Civil War, because the rail lines were not integrated

yet, different grades of track, you had different gauges, different deepness in grade, some

rail had sidetracks where you could park vehicles off to the side, others didn't.

Now, some of the more famous stories, I told you I wanted to integrate some stories, some

of the more famous stories related to rail during the war, and how it's part of the

1st Modern War.

One was Longstreet's 5,000 troops, you know McLaws' and Hood's divisions transferred

to Chickamauga, where the battle was from September 18th to 20th, but they arrived to

participate on the 20th.

And, those 5,000 troops became pivotal in the outcome of Chickamauga in Tennessee.

There were six different railroad companies used, 775 miles of track.

And, the Confederates were sitting on the rooftops during the ride.

Again, there was no central control in command, and that was one of the problems of the Confederacy.

Their lack of central government made it very difficult for all the rail companies to work

together for the military to use them to their advantage.

Oh, before I go to this one, let me add a couple more stories.

When you think of the Confederacy using rail, another example would be the battle of First

Manassas, First Bull Run, and the Manassas Gap Railroad was used by Joseph Johnston's

troops, and they arrived just in time to support Beauregard against the fight against McDowell

at the Battle of First Bull Run.

Another famous Southern example of rail, bringing troops in the nick of time, was Stonewall

Jackson's joining of Lee in the Seven Days Battles, or the Peninsula Campaign.

After Jackson fought in the Valley, he had his troops board, well it was a little more

complicated than that, a little more complex, but they eventually boarded the Central Virginia

line and it brought them to just outside of Richmond, where they were able to join Lee's

push of McClellan back on the James River, and his exit via the Chesapeake.

On the Union side, you had an interesting story.

The Union 11th and 12th Corps were sent to Tennessee, shortly after the Gettysburg Campaign.

This would have been in late September of 1863.

After the Confederates had shifted troops and won the Battle of Chickamauga, and the

federals under Rosecrans had to fall back on their defenses in Chattanooga, and the

Confederates were starting to lay siege there, the federals countered by taking the 11th

and 12th Corps, later combined and became the 20th Corps.

But, they were taken from Meade's Army of the Potomac, placed on the B&O line where

they would eventually access the Louisville line, and that would take them essentially

to the banks of the Tennessee River.

And, so they were able to travel with 20,000 men, 1,200 miles, in less than a week.

That's all part of the 1st Modern War.

You have to understand that no previous war has an example of this.

So, this was all monumental.

And, technology has always been about who is quicker to adapt.

If you adapt to a new technology, you have an advantage over people.

Those who don't adapt as quickly tend to lose – it's that way all through history

folks.

When you teach the Hittites, they were able to overthrow Northern Egypt, because they

adapted to the new technology of iron, which was stronger in battle than was copper, and

brass, and bronze.

So, if you have a new technology and you put it to use quicker, you are likely to benefit,

while the other person is catching up to speed.

Of the units that were in that shift, from Meade's Army on the banks of the Potomac

to Tennessee, were 11th and 12th Corps.

And, one of the brigades was George Sears Greene's brigade, Pap Greene that fought

on Culp's Hill at Gettysburg here.

The 149th New York from Syracuse, and the 60th New York from Ogdensburg, you can go

on down the list, the 137th New York from Binghamton.

Those New York boys, when they were traveling South, they took all kinds of tools, implements,

you know, axes, for example, and they chopped-up the box cars so they could get fresh air.

And, I remember when I was first reading that I thought, "what if they used some of the

same axes that they built those fortifications on Culp's Hill with?"

Those folks, those New Yorkers from Greene's brigade, Geary's division could rearrange

a train car, a freight car as well as they could rearrange the earth over on Culp's

Hill.

I mentioned Ruger NYC.

Ruger's brigade of 12th Corps, you all know they fought on lower Culp's Hill during

this battle.

They made that ill-fated charge with the 27th Indiana, 2nd Mass made that ill-fated charge

across Spangler Meadow and they lost a lot of men.

Well, they recovered well enough to within just a few weeks after that were on a train

headed north, and they would help quell, or put down the draft riots in New York City.

That's pulling double-duty isn't it?

But, it's not possible without rail.

That's the underlying point here.

Hospital trains are important.

This is another big picture point.

Did you all know there was a hospital here for over four months called Camp Letterman?

And, it was east of Gettysburg, and not far from where Giant food store and Walmart is

today, along the York Pike.

There were, at any given time, there were upwards of 1,600 beds, sort-of like applying

for a nursing home, or institution, or hospital, or something, and would have to wait for a

bed.

But, there were still way more troops processed through Camp Letterman than actually had a

bed, way more than 1,600.

It is a very bad notion to say there were only 1,600 cared for at Camp Letterman.

There was something like 20,000 wounded patients processed through Camp Letterman.

Not all of them got a bed.

Only 1,600 got a bed.

Keep in mind, where did the other 18,400 go?

They boarded a train not far from where Walmart is today, and they were taken, with whatever

their would was, they were taken to Philadelphia, Harrisburg, Baltimore or in Washington.

And, within a few hours, they went to a place where there was a better ration of help to

need.

So, they suddenly had a bed, and more doctors and nurses caring for them.

And, when I went to Walter Reed Medical Museum a few years ago, with another ranger here,

and we visited there, they gave us a behind the scenes tour, and they let us handle with

cotton gloves, two skulls of people who had fought in this battle, who had died in Washington

D.C.

And, the first point they made was, "those people died something like a week or two after

the battle, in Washington."

How did that happen?

It is because of rail, the 1st Modern War.

Now, let me put that in context.

Do you remember after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, there were all of these buses parked

outside of New Orleans, and they, while the city was flooded, and helicopters were taking

people off their roofs and putting them on buses, the buses took them to Atlanta, to

the Houston Astrodome, to San Antonio, and gave them shelter, and pets were being adopted

all through the United States from there, and there was a dispersal of people from the

flood area, because the area was overtaxed even for drinkable water.

Do you remember that?

Alright, now think of that example as it relates to rail at Gettysburg, of dispersing the need

into the population, where there's a greater ratio of help to need.

Isn't that fascinating?

Today, if a soldier is wounded in Afghanistan, theoretically within a few hours he can be

convalescing in Germany, far from the scene of action.

And, then theoretically within a couple of weeks, or less than that, he can be at Fort

Hood, Texas way from the scene.

Now, his mind is still swimming from what he endured, and may for years, and he may

never fully recover, but he is geographically far from where he fought.

The first war in human history to remove someone, from the battlefield, that quickly was the

Civil War.

Gettysburg is a great example of that.

It's the 1st Modern War.

Hanover Junction would have been the primary link from the Northern Central to Gettysburg,

via the Hanover-Gettysburg line.

So, Hanover-Junction was a really important holding area.

If you look at some of General Meade's original orders, his Pipe Creek orders, Hanover was

one of the four options where the battle might take place.

You all know that because of the rail.

Okay, that was important, and it turns out that the Confederate troops were not that

far east.

Jubal Early's troops marched back towards the South Mountain, and the battle ended up

closer to, and in Gettysburg.

Jubal Early burned twenty-two bridges, from Gettysburg to Hanover Junction.

Did you all know that?

Twenty-two bridges, it is like I tell people in the field, these are random acts of violence,

and these are not anger management issues, this was intended to target the rail.

General Pickett's division, you know one of the reasons why they were not here at Gettysburg

until the evening of July 2nd and on the battlefield July 3rd, it is because they were tearing

up rail along the Cumberland Valley line.

You know why?

So, the federals could not transport troops in from the Ohio Valley to join the fray.

Rail is very important, you know, so.

And, Lincoln, when he came to speak, he used the same line and he stopped at Hanover Junction,

and Grant came there in 1869 and sat there for a while at the Hanover Junction, before

he came to be hosted by John White Geary, the Governor of Pennsylvania for a tour of

Gettysburg.

He always wanted to see this battlefield that he had heard so much about through Meade,

and other members of the Army of Potomac.

Disrupting rail was also part of the equation.

I have already made a reference to that.

It is estimated that between the four rail lines that I mentioned, the Confederates tore-up

approximately a hundred miles of rail, during the Gettysburg Campaign.

And, so there were ways to achieve this.

The USMRC is demonstrating this, the United States Military Railroad Construction Corps

sometimes would strategically tear-up rail, and you can see them at work there.

Sabotaging rail was turned into a science by Sherman late in the war, into Sherman's

neck-ties.

But JEB Stuart did that during the Gettysburg Campaign too.

You would tear-out a certain section of rail, not the entire length of the rail, but just

a few ties, set fire to the ties, put the rail across until they melted, twist them,

and toss them down into the woods.

And, so then, someone would have to come along and repair them.

And, that was Haupt's United States Military Railroad Construction Corps.

Did you know that Haupt was from Gettysburg?

He lived in the Schultz House.

I know the guides know that, Jim knows that.

His house is beautifully restored, it sits right next to the Lutheran Theological Seminary

at the juncture of Fairfield Road and the Seminary Avenue.

But, Haupt was the military superintendent of all railroads, or a title very close to

that, and he would come along after the Confederates damaged the rail, and he was a wizard at repairing

it.

And, one of his greatest feats, and Lincoln made a special trip just to see it, was the

Potomac Creek Bridge.

It was 400 feet long, 100 feet high.

It was rebuilt by Haupt in 72 hours.

And, Lincoln made the comment that it was made of bean poles and corn stalks.

Have you all heard that before?

And, it was amazing that he learned the old Etruscan – Roman idea of using crisscross,

if you crisscross the wood, you create trusses.

And, therefore, you create more support.

And, that would inspire high rise, steel cage construction.

We have to answer the why?, and the so what?, to all of this.

Not only were the Confederates dumbfounded by how quick Haupt was ready to repair everything,

but then Haupt's construction inspired Carnegie, and his high rise, steel cage construction

in Chicago.

That's where the idea came from, "Haupt of Gettysburg" trusses.

And, then let's talk about ironclads briefly, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy is on

your left, that's Gustavus Fox, the Inspector of Ironclads was Alban Stimers, and the Inventor

and Inventor and Systems Manager was John Ericsson on the far right.

Here's this subtheme of mine, interplay of competing individuals.

And, these three individuals put into the waters, on behalf of the Northern Navy, they

put into the waters these ironclads.

The most famous would be the Monitor and the Merrimac, or the C.S.S.

Virginia.

The Confederates captured what were the remains of a U.S. ship known as the Merrimac, and

they converted it into the C.S.S.

Virginia.

They met on March 9, 1862, in a classic battle off the shores of the coast of Virginia.

And, they lobbed shells back and forth.

The noise was such that sailors inside had nose bleeds and ear bleeds from the concussions

of the noise.

Their shells were not able to penetrate either vessel.

So, after pounding each other for many hours, they disengaged.

When that battle was over, all the wooden fleets of the world were obsolete.

And, so that's the significance of it.

The federal Monitor had the advantage of revolving turret, which allowed them to line-up their

guns no matter how the boat was situated, whereas the C.S.S.

Virginia just had 12 guns broadside, and if the broadside wasn't facing the Monitor,

they were in trouble.

And, so you had turret that revolved.

And, so where did the turret construction, where did the ironclad construction come from?

It came from forges.

This is an interesting point for those who like the study of technology and the development

of technology.

When Fox, Stimers and Ericsson got to together and talked about how to produce many ironclads,

like the Monitor, or similar to the Monitor, vessels that could be placed in the Gulf,

placed in the Mississippi, placed along the coast, is they had those conversations.

Then the question was, who are we going to contract to build them when ship builders

were still building the old technology which was wooden ships?

So, they went to forges, to iron forges.

And, oftentimes the person who agreed to the contract had never built an ironclad before.

I would say in all cases they had never built an ironclad before.

But, they took the contract anyway.

It was good government money coming in, so they would just hammer it out and build these

things according to the design that was given them.

The design, it was originally designed by Ericsson, it was approved for aesthetic purposes,

for artistic purposes by Stimers, and then Gustavus Fox, who was Assistant Secretary

of the Navy went ahead and implemented it.

But, that's what we had going on.

And, then the Passaic was one of the common ironclads that you would see in the bodies

of waters that I mentioned.

And there were coaling stations.

People ask sometimes how, or, why was Florida important during the Civil War, and why were

there skirmishes there at times, conflicts there at times?

And, the answer is, it was an important coaling station along the East Coast.

So, if you controlled it, then you could stop and get coal to continue your journey.

Submarines, well during the American Revolution, there were submarines, including the most

famous American Turtle.

But, the Civil War would improve upon that with the H.L. Hunley.

I tell my son this sometimes, my fourteen year old son, Thomas Edison was asked about

how he invented the lightbulb.

When praised for inventing the light bulb he said, "no, don't praise me, I just

learned 2,000 ways not to invent the lightbulb."

And, that is hard work in experimentation.

Hunley is a similar case.

Hunley had several failed missions, where people died to the point the Confederate government

was leery of giving him another chance.

But, he decided he wanted to break the naval blockade at Charleston Bay.

And, so he convinced enough higher-ups that he could do it.

And, so the Hunley, this is in 1864 now, we will look at specifics in a minute.

The Hunley had a spar on one end.

Can you see the sharp point on the far left?

And, it was harpoon of sorts.

And, so explosives were placed on that harpoon and you would try to align, if you were navigating

the Hunley.

The idea was to align the spar so that it could be rammed and inserted into the side

of a Union ship that was blocking trade in Charleston Harbor.

And then when retracting, the explosive would fall inside the ship, and then it would blow-up.

Inside, it had several people turning cranks.

Okay, and as we try to look for connections across time and space to look for patterns,

the Vikings had oars under ship, you know.

But, these members of the Hunley, they stood inside of a particular groove, and they would

turn the crank.

How did they descend?

Well, there were ballasts under the ship.

Ballasts could be opened to allow water to come in and it would sink.

And, so it would take water.

And, then when they wanted to come up, they released the water from the ballasts and it

would come back up again.

To know that they were running out of oxygen, they had a candle.

As the candle started to flicker, it meant its time come up.

In the two previous instances where it didn't come up, and some people died, they opened

the hatches too early, and it just flooded.

So, this was a very tricky thing.

But, after dark the Hunley approached the U.S.S.

Housatonic, a 16 gun Sloop of War on February 17, 1864, in Charleston Harbor, and successfully

planted the spar in the ship and sunk it.

And, the significance was this was the first example in human history – as we talk about

the 1st Modern War – the first example in human history of a submersible vessel, a submarine

destroying any sort-of floating vessel.

And, in this case, they destroyed a sloop.

And, the Hunley was recently raised.

How many of you knew that?

Just a few years ago, the year 2000 I believe it was raised.

Were any of you there for the ceremony when they reentered the craft and found remains

and reburied them there in Charleston?

And, they had a major ceremony.

Bernadette Atkins who is a dear friend of some, or many of you here, and myself, she

used to run the Eastern National Bookstore.

And, she has a bookstore here in town.

Bernadette was there and brought a stack of pictures back for me to look at.

She was there for the ceremony to celebrate they had found it.

It is in remarkably good shape isn't it?

And, there it is.

It is almost kind-of haunting to see something like that be found on the bottom of the bay

and be brought up.

The North had their version.

It didn't have any, there were some experimental launches, but it didn't have the prestige

of sinking an enemy vessel.

But, nevertheless they had the technology.

It was called the Intelligent Whale.

There was also another one called the Alligator.

But, the Intelligent Whale, this particular one is in the Washington Navy Yard.

I was doing a tour with some group, and we went to Washington, and it was not my part

of the tour, someone else took over at that point, that was their expertise, but they

let us off the bus and told us to walk around the Washington Navy Yard.

I don't know if you have been there, but I stumbled onto this room, and it was really,

really hot that day, there was no air conditioning.

And, I looked-up and saw a sign that said Intelligent Whale.

I thought, "Oh my gosh, there it is."

And, Jules Verne, as we talk about the importance of science -- Einstein said "imagination

is more important than knowledge," right?

Because, you can see that knowledge has limits, but imagination has none.

It's the imagination that leads to inventions like this, and then the knowledge to replicate.

Jules Verne, about that time in his writings, probably inspired the Intelligent Whale.

Leonardo de Vinci did some drawings that are similar hundreds of years earlier, during

the Renaissance.

Yes, the Coffee Mill Gun.

Did you know that the first machine gun was not the Gatlin Gun?

It was actually the Coffee Mill Gun.

And, it was used really earlier in the war in 1861, and seems to have disappeared by

the end of 1862.

But, one of the notable people who ordered it was John White Geary, in his defense of

Harpers Ferry.

Geary was Governor of Pennsylvania from 1867-1873.

He was in command of the troops on Culp's Hill for the most part, and repelled the Confederate

attacks there.

But Geary, he said that they fired at a keg, and six of the ten shots hit the keg, and

he didn't say from what distance.

There is some obscure information on the Coffee Mill Gun, but you would feed the ammunition

in through what looks like a coffee grinder.

And, one other interesting point about all of this.

James Ripley, he was in charge of all the ordnance distribution in Washington, he was

logistics guy.

And, people will ask sometimes, "Why didn't Spencer Repeating Rifles enter in the federal

armies in bulk and in mass earlier?

Why were there only two regiments here at Gettysburg, 5th and 6th Michigan Cavalry that

had them?

Why weren't there more plentiful?

Why wasn't the Gatlin Gun, or Coffee Mill Gun mass produced?

It would have given the Union a unique advantage earlier in the war.

And, one of the answers for all of the above, if you have ever had those thoughts, is James

Ripley.

James Ripley was older, he was from old school, he thought the war was going to be a short

war.

The men had learned Hardee's tactics, and a variation of that later called Casey's

tactics.

They had been trained to fight with Springfield's and Enfield's, and he was not going to mess

with that, and start mixing supplies, causing differences behind the lines, and then confuse

men on how they should fight.

Ripley was out by the middle of 1864, and then you start to see those newfangled weapons,

as he called them, being used in the ranks more plentifully.

There was the Gatlin Gun then.

Its two claims to fame during the war was it was used in the trenches of Petersburg

in the last year of the war, and this may be an urban legend, but there's been a story

for years that for a show of strength, it was brought to the draft riots in New York

City, in July of 1863.

But, that is sometimes disputed.

It would be more commonly used in other wars like the Boer War, the Russians purchased

them, the English purchased them and used them in late 19th century wars.

It was a .58 caliber that fired 200 rounds per minute.

It was steel jacketed.

One of the problems with the Spencer cartridge is that it was copper, for the Spencer Repeating

Rifle, and it would heat up and melt and jam.

Some of you know that.

But, this Gatlin Gun was full proof with a steel jacket.

Let's see, we need to wind down here.

You have the 1862 Springfield, and then you have the Enfield that were produced at armories,

various armories, and the biggest producer would be, of course, at Springfield, Harpers

Ferry, but there were some other armories.

And, the soldiers carried them in the field.

And, one of the problems with the rifle was parabolic trajectory.

If you have been with me on tours out on the battlefield, you've heard me say that on

occasion.

Parabolic trajectory is the arc flight to the projectile.

If you have ever fired a rifle, even now, you don't fire the barrel level to the ground,

because of the curvature to the flight, the ball will curve right into the ground, way

short of its mark.

If you are firing at something a football field's distance, you need to slightly raise

the rifle, so you aim high.

And, then the ball curves, and there's a precision to all of that.

Well, Earl Hess, in his controversial book on the rifled musket argues that the rifled

musket, during the Civil War, was less effective than the smoothbore musket in other major

European battles.

He uses the example of the Battle of Prague, the Battle of Austerlitz.

These are battles that either involved Frederick the Great or Napoleon, where the smoothbore

musket casualties he said were upwards of 28%, whereas the rifled musket, in Civil War

battles, accounted for 10% casualties of the opposition.

Now, why?

Well, you think of the rifle, and this is why the book is so controversial.

Why would that be?

Why is that the case?

Because, of parabolic trajectory, and because they were still firing with weapons before

the era of smokeless gun powder.

So, if you are firing with a precise weapon, and you can't see after the first couple

of volleys, the precision is gone.

Right?

Visibility is key to precision.

So, the attacker, so, you fire high, and so what the attacker does is they go through

low ground.

I've told some of you this a number of times, over the years.

The reason that Pickett's troops went through that low ground beyond the Codori Buildings,

one of the reasons they marched towards the Codori Buildings, because Union artillery

wouldn't fire directly at that house, or the barn.

The barn was a little bit smaller, it was about half the size it is now.

Let me give you a quick example.

You know how you're driving down I-81, and pull-up behind a tractor trailer.

And, if you get close, you can let off the peddle, because he is pulling you.

You know what I'm talking about?

It's called drafting.

It's because that tractor trailer is big enough, it's creating a vacuum of air around

you, and then when it closes-off around your car, you're in that vacuum, that pocket

is just pulling you down the road, and you can just take your foot off the peddle.

But, you're supposed to disconnect.

Why?

It is because your engine will overheat if it is not using its own fan after a while.

So, I thought I would put that precaution in there for you.

The Codori Barn and the house then, think of it as a vacuum that Union artillery could

not curve around.

If you know how to hook a golf ball, I suppose you could fire a draw or fade, or something

like that, but Union artillery could not go around that barn, that's one of the reasons

why the Confederates were guiding on it, at least part of the way.

And, you see in their accounts they mention seeing this conspicuous red building in the

march.

Marching toward that red building would have obscured, you know, a third to maybe half

of the Union artillery.

Now, when they crossed the road, they were in low ground.

And, if you read Armistead Long's account, he was on Lee's staff, he doesn't mention

a 'copse of trees,' or anything like that.

What he mentions is that the Confederates were trying to get into that low ground.

Why?

Because if you are standing on a ridge, and you are Hall, or Harrow, or Webb's brigade

of Gibbon's division, Hancock's Corps, and you are firing off that ridge, and you

are having to aim high to reach the barn, and the Confederates are in low ground, and

you add smoke, a lot of the shots go over their head.

You see that?

And, so they were trying to move – by the way, we are doing history at a higher level

when we look for patterns across time and space, patterns tell us something deeper about

ourselves.

So, apply that pattern everywhere you go that attacks during the Civil War always go through

the lowest possible ground, even if the ground isn't the size of the Grand Canyon.

If it is enough of a depression, it plays games with the parabolic trajectory and the

accuracy of someone who is firing at them from high ground.

Vis-a-vis, the Confederate attacks on Little Round Top and Devil's Den went through Plum

Run Gorge.

The Confederate attacks on McPherson Ridge went through a quarry and Willoughby Run.

You pick low ground.

The Confederate attacks against Culp's Hill were launched from Rock Creek Valley Ravine.

Firing from high ground to low ground with parabolic trajectory and smoke is very difficult.

So, that's a counterpoint about the importance of rifle technology.

But, you had sharpshooters, and they would go out between the lines, and they would occupy

points to fire at you when you crossed an obstacle like a fence.

And, they waited for the moment, and fired at you.

You want to look for skirmish markers on the battlefield?

Find the nearest fence, or the nearest creek and then back-up about fifty yards, and that's

where the line was.

They made the enemy pay for crossing that obstacle.

So, sharpshooters were out in "no man's land."

They learned how to fire a rifle with the advantages of that new technology.

The average soldier in the ranks just fired three shots a minute behind a wall of smoke,

didn't know what they were firing at, accuracy was reduced by the smoke, parabolic trajectory.

The sharpshooter went far enough out in front of the lines where the smoke cleared.

They separated sometimes 15-50 yards so that they would have the smoke clear, and they

would have one clear shot after another.

There were ethical problems with that.

Nineteenth Century people were very concerned about shooting at someone when they were not

defending themselves.

But, sharpshooters were introducing the rifle as a new technology.

Did you know that the Confederates used rifling to keep Union artillery from being as effective.

Do you recognize McGilvery's batteries there near the Pennsylvania Memorial and 1st Minnesota

Monument?

It is over on the far left in the Union defense against Pickett's Charge.

And, do you see the George Weikert Farm beyond that?

Okay, the woods to the right of the George Weikert Farm, a little bit farther to the

right, beyond our view, would be called Trostle Woods.

And, the Confederates after the fight in the Wheatfield on July 2nd, mostly the 18th Mississippi

sent their best squirrel hunters to climb the trees, not unlike someone working on a

utility pole, you know, working their way up to the top to work on the transformer box.

And, they just shot constantly at McGilvery's guns.

If you go over there today to the Pennsylvania Memorial, and you will see all those guns

aligned, and there are lunettes in front of them, these crescent moon-shaped lunettes,

they are earthen mounds.

And, why were they built?

They were to absorb incoming sharpshooting fire, as well as explosive shell.

Isn't that fascinating?

What were the sharpshooters trying to do?

They were not only trying to weaken the federals, and kill a number, and wound a number of their

artillerymen -- that would cut down on Union efficiency during the cannonade, where if

you have to sequester infantry, and do on-the-job-training to replace people that have been wounded,

you don't fire two shots a minute with artillery do you during the cannonade? -- so, the Confederates

were using sharpshooters to soften up the Union line, their artillery before they made

the charge.

Secondly, by positioning sharpshooters to continually shoot at McGilvery, the 6th Maine,

and some of those other units, received a message of don't dare think of counterattacking

with your artillery.

"If you advance with artillery, we'll take out every one of them."

In Napoleon times, you could advance artillery in a charge, but in the Civil War, there were

no artillery charges.

Why?

It was because of sharpshooters.

And so, we answered the "so what" question there.

And, this is the last portion of it.

My favorite point, we will fly through it.

It's the idea of the Art of War as it relates to field fortification technology.

It is Jomini versus Gay de Vernon.

And, these two thought processes competed with one another all throughout the war, with

arguably Gay de Vernon's concepts winning out.

But, before the Civil War began, there were two schools of thought on how you should fight

Napoleonic War.

The Jomini school of thought said you should mass troops on a critical point of mass and

overwhelm it.

That is, even leave parts of your line vulnerable to counterattack so that you overwhelm the

most important point on the battlefield.

Vis-à-vis, the continual Confederate attacks on Culp's Hill, and the Confederate attacks

"up the Emmitsburg Road," were supposed to sandwich the Union line at Cemetery Hill,

disconnect the federals, cut the head-off, and separate the Union in two, force them

to fallback across the logistical wagons somewhere closer to Maryland.

Alright, and that's why we have that.

Lee believed in critical mass on one point.

Grant did too.

But, that was the Jomini thing, put troops, mass them, overwhelm a point, and then all

of the other pieces will fall into place.

But, what was starting to replace that with modern war was Gay de Vernon's ideas that

– and you can see his book on the right, Science of War and Fortifications – he was

arguing, "no, leave a leaner, meaner, smaller force with field fortifications that will

make them larger.

So, instead of putting 5,000 troops in one location, for critical mass, put 1,500 troops

there and learn how to throw up field fortifications, which will turn them into a 5,000 man force

if you know how to build them.

You see what I am saying?

And, in that way, you can avoid putting all your eggs in one basket, all your chips on

the table with critical mass.

Instead, you can spread those troops out to cover passes, to cover pontoon bridges at

key river crossings, to cover symbolic places, to cover naval yards, to cover army headquarters.

You can diversify where you place everyone by just learning the technology of field fortifications.

And, by the end of the Civil War, his ideas were gaining traction.

Gettysburg is considered a pivotal moment.

Some of you heard me in my lecture a couple months ago say that the Battle of Gettysburg

is sometimes referred to as the "last romantic battle."

That's imperfect language, but last romantic battle is the last battle where people stood

out in the open to some degree, toe-to-toe, and fought each other like a gentleman's

duel on a grand scale.

And, you face your accuser out in the open, and you restore your reputation, and you fire

back and forth.

Gettysburg, though, like all historic events is more complex than that.

Larry, you know that field fortification technology was being subtly introduced into this battle.

It was not full-blown trench warfare, but there was field fortification technology.

As you look at East Cemetery Hill, for instance, this is a photograph taken a few days after

the battle, looking from the Baltimore Pike to the north.

And, where you see the trees and some fallen brush, if you look through a magnifying glass,

you'll see abatis and palisades there.

Abatis, in the era before barbed wire, were branches or small woods that you would cut,

and sharpen the end just like a pencil.

And, stick it in the ground to impale your opponent if they didn't watch their step

as they came towards the artillery.

It's a way of slowing them down, creating points where the enemy has to stop and you

get a clear line of fire at them.

And, if you read Harry T. Hays' account, he commanded the Louisiana Brigade at Gettysburg,

and he had charged up East Cemetery Hill.

He said, "we overran their abatis," he actually mentions the abatis in his account.

And, I remember the thrill I had in the book Gettysburg: A Journey in Time, the first time

I looked in Frassanito's book with a magnifying glass, and saw the abatis.

Do that yourself when you get home.

You know, maybe that's a little strange, but in this audience that's normal.

And, palisades are the same kind-of thing.

They are small woods driven into the ground that are sharpened.

You see this picture taken from the Evergreen Cemetery Gatehouse looking north toward where

the Hancock and Howard monuments are now.

And, there's a Union regiment there.

They were cleaning up muskets off the battlefield, burying the dead, and doing various other

things several days after the battle when this photograph was taken.

And, notice over on the far right side of their tents you see smoke.

They were burning palisades and abatis and using it for firewood.

So, East Cemetery Hill had field fortification technology.

This is just so fascinating.

If you read Isaac Seymour's account, he was on Harry T. Hays' staff, the Louisiana

Brigade that attacked East Cemetery Hill, and he said, "we could hear the federals

up there working like busy beavers all night."

Well, he wasn't talking about Culp's Hill, he was talking about East Cemetery Hill.

Isn't that fascinating?

And, where did they get the wood from, by the way?

There was a patch of woods where Georgia and Ginny Wade House is today, and you all know

where O'Rorkes is?

Did you know there was a patch of woods there?

GTC bus parking lot is there now.

That's the patch of woods where they were getting their wood materials from.

Okay, and embrasures were also part of the field fortification technology -- of this

1st Modern War -- that Gay de Vernon recommended.

Embrasures, have you ever seen a turret at the top of a castle, and it has dental-like

indentations?

That's so you can step behind, if it's an arrow or whatever it is you are loading,

you can step behind the denture, and then step back into the portal and fire.

And, those are called embrasures.

And, see how the federals built their redoubts around their artillery, and placed their planks

in such a way so they had walk-through points.

Lunettes, and you can see the Confederates attacking East Cemetery Hill, with the famous

Evergreen Cemetery Gatehouse as the focal point in the background.

And, you can see the Federal 11th Corps up there behind their lunettes.

And, this is what they look like, you know, today.

They were re-dug in the 1930s by the CCC boys.

And, then you have earthworks.

If you go over to, between McKnight's Knoll or Stevens Knoll, and Culp's Hill, and you

walk up through the woods towards Culp's Hill, did you know there are earthworks up

through there?

Yes, it's fascinating.

They are still there.

They are actually there.

I don't believe most people see them.

And, it's probably better that they don't.

We want to keep it a secret.

But, with the woods recently being cleared there, you can see them even better.

Just take your dog and walk through there at some point.

On Stevens Knoll, you can see the Iron Brigade's earthworks.

They are still there.

Again, they were re-dug, re-entrenched in the 1930s, but they are where the Iron Brigade

left them overlooking, you know, from Stevens Knoll out towards East Cemetery Hill.

And, then the breastworks on Culp's Hill, they were fairly elaborate.

Here's kind-of a caricature of the 149th New York from Syracuse on Culp's Hill firing

behind these fortifications.

If you read Edward O'Neal's account, he commanded the Alabamians that attacked the

Syracuse line on July 3rd.

He said they were like log cabins at the top of the hill.

The federals actually felled trees and did some master craftsman work.

You can see Color Sgt.

William Lilley being presented there on the relief.

What he did was, there were so many Confederate projectiles that flew through there that it

cut the flag staff in half, of the 149th New York.

So he's spliced it together.

Isn't that neat?

So, he using a splint and putting it together so that he can plant it back and show the

Confederates, discourage them from trying.

There were traverses on Culp's Hill.

That's all part of the Gay de Vernon idea on field fortification technology.

A bonnet traverse is like a bonnet you wear on your head.

That means it's a head covering.

But, the traverse is something that goes at right angles with the main line.

And, on Culp's Hill, you all recognize Dr. Fennel there, Charlie Fennel, one of our licensed

guides?

He's standing where the traverse is today.

If you walk over there on Culp's Hill, the earth is still risen up from the traverse

built there by David Ireland and the 137th New York from Binghamton.

And, but there's a mound there.

A traverse also indicates that there are compartments that protect you at right angles.

So, there would have been a little zig-zag to the traverse.

When the Confederates from Virginia, North Carolina and Maryland attacked that position,

they would have had trouble being able to approach the federals in any direction and

have a clear line of fire.

Traverses also tend to have boards that go across the forehead.

And, we don't have precise proof that this particular traverse on Culp's Hill had one,

but a lot of traverses have a board that covers the forehead.

You know why?

It's to protect against plunging.

The federals might have had these headboards as well.

It is like a football player who has a face mask.

It doesn't stop his eyes from being harmed, but it fends-off a lot of blows to the head.

In a similar way, a board at forehead level stops a Confederate on lower Culp's Hill

from shooting down into the ravine into the top of the head.

That's called plunging.

So it is with the traverses.

Big Round Top has stone walls that were constructed the night of July 2nd.

Did you all know that?

And, they run from the top of Big Round Top all the way to near the 44th New York monument,

not quite that far, but almost to Little Round Top.

Unbelievable, and they built them up there.

And, the Confederates said, General Longstreet told Lee, "You don't want to attack Round

Top again," he told him on the morning of July 3rd, "they have been building stone

walls up there all night."

They could hear the echoes of the rocks being put into place.

The 20th Maine, the stone wall that's been put into place to the 20th Maine, where Joshua

Chamberlain made his famous counterattack, was not there when the 15th Alabama attacked

them.

It was built after the attack, in case they attacked again.

And, that's field fortification technology.

Now, the stone wall itself would have been dressed up with abatis in front of it.

It would have also been built into natural rock formations already there.

So, by the time the Confederates get anywhere near the house, he's stumbled and bumbled

across all kinds-of natural obstacles that he stone wall enhances.

Yes, that was built after the famous fight.

The 13th Vermont rifle works, can you see behind the Sgt.

Brown statue and the 13th Vermont monument, along the fence there how the earth has been

changed?

That's over on the fields of Pickett's Charge.

Those are field fortifications.

The 13th Vermont would have dismantled that fence, and laced it in with the earthwork

to make it stronger and give it fiber strength.

Out in front of the Hancock wound monument, in the fields of Pickett's Charge, out on

that little plateau, in front of it was field fortifications built there too by the 13th,

14th and 16th Vermont.

It would have been about waist high.

It would have been laced with stone, dirt, dismantled rail.

And, it was one of the reasons why Pickett's troops had to march in front of the Union

line.

They couldn't flank it because of the field fortification technology.

Isn't that fascinating there?

You normally never hear that.

If you look at the Codori Thicket, and how rough that is, tie that into McGilvery's

lunettes, and then tie that in with the field fortification technology the Vermonters put

there, the Confederates were not, would have ideally wanted to flank Hancock's line,

and get reverse fire with frontal fire and roll the Union line up in the direction of

the Angle and beyond.

But, they were never able to flank, and then the federals turned the trick on them by pivoting

Stannard out into the field.

But, they were initially firing behind fortifications.

Where did those fortifications go? 1n 1887, a rail line was built across from Harrisburg

to Gettysburg, and then across the fields of Pickett's Charge.

And, that's when the field fortifications were leveled.

The whole National Cemetery would have looked like a hundred ground hogs were let loose

in it, before the cemetery was created.

The National Cemetery smoothed all that ground out, but there was all kinds-of field fortification

technology in what is now the National Cemetery.

And, in front of the 20th Massachusetts Infantry marker, see those field fortifications?

They're significant.

That's what Pickett's troops were up against.

If you read James Kemper's account, to John Bachelder, its 1871 or 1873, he wrote Bachelder,

Kemper was the Governor of Virginia at the time.

He had been in Pickett's Charge, was wounded.

He wrote Bachelder and he said, "I didn't allow any of my men, in the preliminary hours

before [we call it Pickett's Charge] the attack to leave their swales, and walk to

the top of the ridge where the artillery was," he said, "I didn't want them having a

look at the field fortifications."

He actually mentions them.

They must have been formidable.

And, then we have the stone wall at the High Water Mark.

How many of you have noticed the new stone walls that are being put up out there?

Okay, now they are not exact replicas.

There are some differences and people have raised concerns, and that kind-of thing.

Although, I think all of those concerns have been addressed.

The park has been real attentive to that.

But, they are meant to represent where the actual stone walls were.

We are trying to put back stone walls that were removed with construction of the Cyclorama

building.

But it's gone, the Cyclorama has been demolished.

We're putting those old, original stone walls back up.

But, occasionally somebody will look at the representation walls that we put up in the

last nine to ten months, and they'll say, "could they have been that tall during the

battle?"

And, the answer is yes.

Look at this hand shake in 1938 at the 'Angle,' where Pickett's Charge was repulsed.

Look at how high up they are.

And, the 69th Pennsylvania, they felled trees from the 'copse of trees' to create abatis

all out in front of them, that position.

The 'copse of trees' was not very tall, but they extended all the way out towards

the Emmitsburg Road.

And, all those trees were ground down like an orchard manager prunes down an orchard

to just nobs, sharpened knobs.

The Confederates called the area all in front of the 'copse of trees' the 'slashing.'

Slashing, have you ever been into a forest where they felled a lot of trees, and maybe

the trees have been dragged out of there, but there's still a lot of debris lying

around, that you better not walk through without steel-tipped boots.

You know what I'm talking about?

That's slashing.

The 69th Pennsylvania, the 71st, 72nd, 106th Pennsylvania, 59th New York, they put all

of those sharpened abatis obstacles out in front of the line.

Okay, our summary conclusion.

The 19th century has been compared to a driver who looks in the rearview mirror at what is

behind them, while they drive down the highway at 65 mph.

Similarly, generations that lived between 1800 and 1903 witnessed the steam train, steam

boat, steam factory, steam press, photography, telegraph, telephone, x-ray machine, electric

grids, combustible engines and first flight, even as they clung to the past.

With all of this rapid change, they still looked to pre-modern traditions for meaning

with their Victorian dress, manners, social values and class structure.

They fixated on the past, while charging full steam ahead.

The American Civil War represents the clashing of pre-modern and modern worlds in favor of

modernization.

The war became a testing and proving grounds for the modern world.

Thank you for coming out today, and coming out all winter.

For more infomation >> How Does The Civil War Qualify as the First Modern War? - Duration: 1:36:58.

-------------------------------------------

Preparations underway as Gulf Coast braces for Hurricane Harvey - Duration: 1:12.

For more infomation >> Preparations underway as Gulf Coast braces for Hurricane Harvey - Duration: 1:12.

-------------------------------------------

Packers legend Jerry Kramer picked as senior committee candidate for Pro Football Hall of Fame - Duration: 0:52.

For more infomation >> Packers legend Jerry Kramer picked as senior committee candidate for Pro Football Hall of Fame - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Soccer booming as school and city demographics change - Duration: 2:23.

For more infomation >> Soccer booming as school and city demographics change - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

Jordan Peterson - As pessoas não gostam da ideia de Q.I. (Legendado - Portugês) - Duration: 3:25.

For more infomation >> Jordan Peterson - As pessoas não gostam da ideia de Q.I. (Legendado - Portugês) - Duration: 3:25.

-------------------------------------------

Rain chances will increase as Hurricane Harvey races to the coast - Duration: 1:51.

For more infomation >> Rain chances will increase as Hurricane Harvey races to the coast - Duration: 1:51.

-------------------------------------------

#Chelsea vs Everton: Potential tactics and key men as the champs bid to tame Wayne Rooney - Duration: 9:12.

Chelsea vs Everton: Potential tactics and key men as the champs bid to tame Wayne Rooney

PREMIER LEAGUE champions Chelsea began their title defence in stunningly poor fashion, losing 3-2 at home to Burnley in their opening fixture of the 2017/18 campaign. However, they followed that up with an excellent 2-1 win away to Tottenham Hotspur.

Antonio Conte saw Chelsea recover form a 3-2 opening defeat against Burnley with a battling 2-1 triumph over Tottenham at Wembley.

Ronald Koeman has strengthened his Everton squad in many positions after selling Romelu Lukaku to Man Utd for £75m.

Antonio Conte's side dug deep, defended well and took their chances against last season's runners-up to clinch a crucial three points at Wembley Stadium, giving them confidence ahead of another big league clash.

Everton established themselves as the Premier League's best outside of the top six last term, but they want more than that this time around.

And, having reinvested the proceeds of Romelu Lukaku's sale to Manchester United wisely, they look strong enough to compete with anyone in the division.

This was proven in their most recent outing, a trip to face Pep Guardiola's Manchester City, in which they took the lead and held on for a good point against their ambitious, big-spending opposition.

That result came on the back of a 1-0 win over Stoke City to begin the season.

Chelsea and Everton meet at Stamford Bridge this Sunday, with kick-off  at 1.30pm. Both sides are resurgent and will see the match as an opportunity to build on positive recent performances. Here, our friends at Football Whispers break down the match.

Sunday's game will see two of the Premier League's best ball-winning midfielders meet, as N'Golo Kante faces Idrissa Gueye. Both enjoyed stellar 2016/17 campaigns, and their meeting will be vital to the outcome of this weekend's match.

N'Golo Kante was rated by many as the most important Chelsea player last term.

Idrissa Gueye has become a vital player for the Toffees in their engine room. The former is the engine upon which Chelsea's play is built. First and foremost, he is an astoundingly energetic player.

He runs, chases and harries relentlessly in search of possession. However, he is also an efficient passer and is capable of setting up quick counter-attacks.

Gueye is not dissimilar in style, with the majority of his best work coming in the defensive phase.

Indeed, last season he completed more tackles per game (4.1) than any other Premier League player, with Kante coming in third on that list with an average of 3.7.

The duo are the star players in their respective teams' midfields, which will arguably be the most important area of the pitch on Sunday afternoon.

Whoever comes out on top in this individual battle will undoubtedly enhance their side's chances of success on the day.

Marcos Alonso showed with his match-winning double against Spurs that Chelsea might not need a new left wing-back.

Throughout the summer window, Chelsea have been persistently linked with a move for a left wing-back. Juventus' Alex Sandro, Arsenal's Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Tottenham's Danny Rose have all been mentioned as targets, but there doesn't appear any real need to sign them.

Marcos Alonso has been superb in the position so far this term, building on a solid debut year in English football with a match-winning display away to Spurs.

After opening the scoring at Wembley with a beautiful free kick, he hit the winner on the break to seal three crucial points.   Moment of the Round: Wayne Rooney scores his 200th Prem goal for Everton against old enemy Manchester City.

  Marcos Alonso grabs an important brace for Chelsea as Antonio Conte celebrates winning goal against Tottenham. The Spaniard has been joined at Chelsea by his compatriot and fellow former Real Madrid youth team graduate Alvaro Morata.

The striker arrived to replace the wantaway Diego Costa up front and has shown plenty of good signs with intelligent runs and pace.

On his Premier League debut he scored one goal and set up another, while against Tottenham he defended well and nearly found the net with his only real chance.

He and Alonso have both shown match-winning capability and will need to do so again this Sunday. Alvaro Morata has shown signs of settling in quickly after his switch from Real.

Everton's best performer this season has, in the eyes of many, been Wayne Rooney who reached 200 Premier League goals. However, Dominic Calvert-Lewin has impressed with his direct running, ceaseless work ethic and aerial ability.

The versatile youngster has played up front and at wing-back so far, and his movement in the channels could cause problems for new Chelsea signing Antonio Rudiger.

Meanwhile, Ronald Koeman will be hoping for a resolute display from centre-back Michael Keane to stifle the champions at the other end.

Everton new boy Michael Keane will hope to stifle the big-name Chelsea raiders. While Conte experimented successfully with a 3-5-2 system against Tottenham, he may go back to his tried and trusted 3-4-3 in a bid to break down more defensive opposition.

Everton showed their fortitude against Manchester City, so introducing Pedro alongside Morata and Willian could be necessary. The change in shape should also see David Luiz drop back into a more familiar central defensive role alongside Rudiger and Cesar Azpilicueta.

David Luiz is tipped to revert to his usual role in the centre of Chelseas defence. But the trio could have their hands full, especially if Koeman decides to grant Gylfi Sigurdsson his first start for the Toffees.

The Icelandic creator could be called upon to play in an advanced central role supporting Rooney and Calvert-Lewin. Meanwhile, Everton could pair Gueye with home-grown starlet Tom Davies in midfield.

Tom Davies, seen shadowing Man City defender Vincent Kompany, is a hot, home-grown prospect in the Everton midfield.

Going into this Sunday's match, Chelsea are the least disciplined side in the Premier League. In two matches they have picked up six yellow cards and two reds. They will need to curb their tempers against their visitors this weekend.

Only four teams in the league have attempted more long balls than Everton's 74 per game. Those teams are Crystal Palace, Watford, Burnley and West Bromwich Albion.

Koeman's side will be hoping their directness and aerial strength will come to the fore against a new-look Blues back line.

For more infomation >> #Chelsea vs Everton: Potential tactics and key men as the champs bid to tame Wayne Rooney - Duration: 9:12.

-------------------------------------------

Harvey holding as a Category 1 hurricane but continually strengthening - Duration: 1:22.

For more infomation >> Harvey holding as a Category 1 hurricane but continually strengthening - Duration: 1:22.

-------------------------------------------

The latest on Hurricane Harvey as of 9PM Thursday - Duration: 5:27.

For more infomation >> The latest on Hurricane Harvey as of 9PM Thursday - Duration: 5:27.

-------------------------------------------

Your Role as CIO: Now and Tomorrow - Duration: 12:01.

In the world of digital transformation roles

are changing.

I had the opportunity to sit down with Norm Judah, CTO for

Microsoft Services.

I asked him what should CIOs be doing and

how should they be thinking about organizational change?

He says to think strategically about new business models and

the assets of an organization.

Almost as if they were mutual funds,

always making sure everything is operational and secure.

Enjoy this next discussion.

[MUSIC]

Today's guest is Microsoft's Chief Technology Officer for

Microsoft Services, Norm Judah.

Hello Norm, it's really good to see you in somewhere other than

the airport.

>> It is. Hi, Jacky.

Thanks for having me.

Great to be here.

>> Yeah, so you lead the services organization.

>> Well, I'm the CTO in the organization.

I've been in that role for many years,

and really have this most fantastic job today,

cuz I sit between products and technologies and customer and

solutions, and have this wonderful connection about

providing sort of feedback in both directions.

>> All right, so CTO.

Strategic adviser.

>> [LAUGH] >> Looking at technology,

advising customers, all of that.

How do you help customers prioritize

their transformation goals?

Or do you?

>> Many cases, the question is how do I start?

And actually the question that comes before that is

what are my competitors doing?

Out of that comes this notion of am I leading?

Am I lagging?

Where do I sit relative to the others?

And so there's lots of conversations

about where to start and how to start.

But the core thing to start is building capability.

You need to understand what you need to do,

how you need to do it.

And it doesn't have to be thousands of people.

It can be a core team.

And so I see around the world, interestingly enough this isn't

just centralized in big countries,

even in smaller countries with smaller companies,

you see an inkling of an organization forming.

They may have a chief digital officer,

a CDO, maybe somewhere in the CIO organization.

It varies where it sits, but

it's a small group that gets established.

I was recently in Canada.

I met with one of the banks.

And this particular bank,

what they have done is decided they need to differentiate.

This motivation to change came from them.

It came right from the top.

So they built out a facility called the digital factory.

They're 50 people there.

And their job is actually to build the facility,

provide capability, but then they'll pull in project teams.

So there's a project team working on customer services.

There's a project team working on credit card.

They will pull those teams in and innovate and

create with them together.

So having a different place is incredibly important and

gives you the freedom to unlock yourself from the chains that

you had before.

Bring them in, hold their hands, demonstrate, provide them with

capability if they don't know how to do something.

Get them to think about the change, and then they'll go back

to where they were and deliver the change there.

>> Do they also spend time thinking about

what the transformation should look like?

What success looks likes?

Or are they just innovating.

What are they doing?

>> It's actually a combination of them both.

There's a method that we've been using that actually is

a combination of design thinking, as well as some work

that came out of Microsoft Design called inclusive design.

So it's a method that we use that starts to give direction

and structure and solidity to the thing that you're trying

to do, but it's highly interactive and very iterative.

So you don't know what the answer is until you get there.

You may know that this prototype might take you down a great

path, or that path.

You don't know until you've actually done it.

Let me give you an example.

Let's say you're trying to measure customer sentiment in

a retail store of some kind.

How are you gonna measure sentiment?

And so, most people jump to a piece of hardware.

You see it's got these little buttons on it.

There's a smiley face and a red face.

And you walk up and you press a button, but

it is a piece of hardware.

Now you actually

have to get people accommodating to the hardware.

You have to get them to take the action of actually giving you

sentiment.

But if you look in most retail outlets,

you look up in the ceiling, you will see a security camera.

And that camera is actually scanning everywhere.

It's looking at everything that everybody is doing.

So we have video capabilities today, we actually demonstrated

it at the Build conference a couple weeks ago,

where we can look at that video stream, either in real time or

in batch mode afterwards, and

we can start to give you demographic data.

We can give you demographic data and sentiment.

And so that world that we're in there is actually taking

the physical world and putting this virtual map on top of it.

That gives you a map of the status.

Those are little things.

We can do that quickly.

We can have a prototype up and running in a couple weeks.

Transformation doesn't have to be massive new business models.

Those are great, and actually we do see companies doing very

interesting things with introducing new models, but

it doesn't all have to be there.

You can actually start small.

>> I think that's a good point, especially in a world where

things are going at the speed of light.

>> Right. >> And your competitors

just literally right next to you and every little bit counts.

When you think about the role of the technologist, CIO,

a developer, what changes in this new world as we think about

every company is gonna be a technology company,

every company is gonna transform and, frankly speaking,

everybody thinks they know technology?

What changes?

>> I would change a little bit what you said,

which was every company is a software company.

>> Right. >> Not necessarily every

company is a technology company.

If you're not a software company you just haven't discovered it

yet because, in one form or another, software and

data is actually core to what you do.

20 years ago, it was in MIT.

You had PhD students running around and

millions of dollars worth of hardware.

So the infrastructure will continue to

get deeper and deeper.

But from the CIO's perspective, the question is still

what are the digital assets that I can gather and

how do I operate on them?

In the past, it was ERP.

And the digital assets was customer, and order, and product

at a sort of a fundamental elemental level of the company,

these core entities of the company.

But now I actually wanna go higher than that.

And so I think that the CIO still has this role of

the identification of those assets and

the manipulation of those assets.

They're probably not gonna be running many servers,

I would think.

There's gonna be not that much plumbing running around.

But the sort of competency of the CIO is still gonna be

the orchestration of that.

Which means that the CTO still has a function of looking at

the underlying technologies, understanding where they are,

understanding where they might go to,

actually articulating a technology strategy.

Not that it's very technical, but a technology strategy for

the company that's forward looking,

reaching out to what's possible.

That cycle will just continue.

>> But it does put a different lens and a different acumen.

So we always talk about a seat at the table and

having that business acumen.

You put a whole new lens on that now because now, to your point,

you're not actually running.

You may have to integrate.

You may have assess providing.

You have to know who the best of breed is, and so understanding

your vertical, or where you're playing, is very different now.

>> I think it's a financial question for the CIO,

funnily enough.

Which is, when I think about architectural principles,

technology investment principles,

you have to look at it as if you're managing a mutual fund.

There's some long term bets you're gonna have and

there's some short term bets.

And the impact of short term bets is you're gonna spend

some money but know that it's gonna go away.

Longer term bets are you're actually going to

deeply invest in a technology set.

It's gonna be durable.

Measure of durable technology is interesting, 5 years or

10 years or 15 years.

I don't know.

So I think that the CIO owns that portfolio and

owns the investment model underlying that portfolio.

Gonna get lots of inputs.

The CTO's gonna tell you gotta go to this wonderful new thing.

And you're gonna get other people who are gonna tell you,

no, I need to stay with this old thing.

And so that's no different to your job today.

[LAUGH] You're still balancing all these things.

>> I would add, though, when you think about the leader, CIO,

CTO, whomever that may be, and your point about that

data culture, understanding the insights, understanding how to

include those digitally born young ones that you spoke to.

How do you think about how you develop the capability and

how you assess the maturity of your capability to transform?

>> So the maturity assessment is actually really interesting, cuz

you could look at that across the breadth of the company.

And you can look at it by industry.

You can actually look at it by technology.

And so the work that we've done is by the four pillars,

the digital pillars, which is around customer,

employee, product, service, and operation.

Looking at those pillars, what are the categories of maturity?

And then what are the maturity levels?

It's a fairly simple assessment, but what it does for

customers is really interesting.

Cuz they may see,

there's typically four levels that we define,

at one particular capability I might be at a level two.

But everybody else is at level two so I'm not that worried.

But I might find another one where everybody else is at

threes and fours, and I'm at one,

so there's a place where I have to take some action.

Let me give you an example.

We did some work with one of the big industrial auto manufacturers

in Latin America.

And we did this model with them, and one of the things that came

up was they called marketing insight.

And they could see that in that place they were kind of

weaker than others.

And the way they expressed it to us was how are they

projecting demand.

And so, like many companies even today, their sales quotas for

next year are their sales quotas of this year plus 7.3%.

Some random number.

There's nobody in finance who comes up with a multiply and

we go out with that number.

But they wanted to do better than that.

Those are all backward-looking historical based forecasts.

And so what they started to do,

in this trucking company, was go out and look for

construction contracts, road contracts, government contracts.

The beat of those is a signal to them about future demand.

Because if you're gonna be doing big construction projects,

a building or a bridge, they're gonna need trucks and

they're probably gonna wear the trucks out.

And so they learned, the first thing that they learned

here was that, A. they didn't have the capability.

B. The capability to them was actually about getting data that

wasn't theirs.

This was a major insight for them cuz every thing that they'd

done before was about everything that they knew,

and they suddenly realized that there were things that they

didn't know that was not their information.

And if only I could get that information and

bring it in, now I could be more accurate.

And it's a data marketplace where you have data,

not enough for what you need and you need to go pull data in, but

I'll bet you that you have data that somebody else needs.

And so this notion of the value of information, and being able

to aggregate mine with yours to give me a special result,

which I may or may not share with you.

But it has value, which probably means I'm going to pay for

it in some way.

There's a business model in that.

Back to the CIO.

Congratulations, you're the owner of this marketplace.

You're potentially the broker of the data.

And so this notion of maturity actually is about maturity of

the business, but it's also about maturity of IT.

So these models are super important.

>> I wanna have another discussion following on this.

>> I'll be happy to do that again.

>> I think there is so much we can discuss.

>> Love to come back, thank you.

>> Thank you.

Thanks for joining us.

I am keen to hear from you, our audience.

Please let us know what you've enjoyed or

what you would like to hear in future episodes.

I'm Jacky Wright.

Look forward to seeing you next time.

For more infomation >> Your Role as CIO: Now and Tomorrow - Duration: 12:01.

-------------------------------------------

Islam is for Fools as Hebrews owned allah 1,500 Years Prior to Arabic Script! - Duration: 9:19.

In terms of their platitude, the recent attacks (in UK) are not connected.

But we believe

we are experiencing a new trend in the threat we face as terrorism breeds terrorism.

And perpetrators are inspired to attack not only on the basis of

carefully constructed plots after years of planning and training. And not even as

lone attackers radicalized online by copying one another and often using the

crudest of means of attack. We cannot and must not pretend that things can

continue as they are things need to change and they need to change in four

important ways: First, while the recent attacks are not connected by common

networks, they are connected in one important sense they are bound together

by the single evil ideology of Islamist extremism that preaches hatred, sows

division and promotes sectarianism. It is an ideology that claims our Western

values of freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with the

religion of Islam. It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam and a

perversion of the truth. Defeating this ideology is one of the great challenges

of our time but it cannot be defeated through military intervention alone. It

will not be defeated through the maintenance of a permanent defensive

counterterrorism operation, however skillful its leaders and practitioners.

It will only be defeated when we turn people's minds away from this violence

and make them understand that our values, pluralistic British values are superior

to anything offered by the preachers and supporters of hate.

Peace be with you. British Prime Minister Theresa May did not dare to classify Islam

is meant for the fools in the world but I will. She has classified Islamic terrorists

are adopting the ideology of hatred and violence. Do you ever wonder as to why Islam is meant

for the fools in the world? The preception about Islam has changed dramatically after

Muslim terrorists engaged in attacking US by 4 hijacked commercial planes on September

11, 2001 with 2,996 deaths. The contributor at wikipedia has compiled a list of Islamist

terrorist attacks since 1970s. The total number of deaths caused by Islamic ideology in year

2014 was over 2,120, year 2015 was over 3,108, year 2016 was over 1,413 and year 2017 was

424 at the time of writing this comment. London Bridge terror attack on June 4, 2017 killed

7 civilians and on August 18, 2017 Barcelona attack resulted in 15 deaths. How could the

so called religion of peace, bring about over 1,400 deaths each year for the past 3 consecutive

years? The root cause is in the Book called Quran. There are many Muslims who did not

follow the teachings in the Quran closely and they have been branded as false Muslims.

I speak the message of love for the Muslims be they false muslims or true muslims, as

they are all lost in the world of civilization and of the internet globalization.

Gone are the days when the Arabs in Medinah and Mecca, spoke the word Allah which no one

challenges them but accepted them as the norms for the Arabs till today. It is time for the

Hebrews and Christians, to reclaim the glory of the Hebrew language and mock the encroachment

of the Hebrew word Allah written about 2000 years before the advent of Islam for an oak

tree in the land of Palestine. I will not bother about the word Allah which the Arabs

used it ignorantly for God instead of the Hebrew word elahh, with double H.

This research into the origin of the word Allah began in year 1999, due to Malaysian

government banned the word Allah from the non-Muslims in Malaysia. After searching for

the Hebrew words if there is any similar word Allah in the Hebrew Lexicon, wow!, there is

a word Allah used in Joshua Chapter 24 verse 26. So all Muslims should blame Malaysia for

provoking the Christians in the West to mock all Allah Oak worshippers.

Now is the time for the Christians to stay clear from Hebrew word Allah as the scripture

cannot be broken. God cannot be mocked for the stupidity of the Arabic language came

only after 250 A D by any archaeological evidence on the origin of the Arabic script.

All Muslims are fools in Islam as the word Allah was used by the Hebrews 1400 years earlier

before the existence of Arabic language. I challenge Muslims to refute Hebrew word codified

H427 allah was originally an Arabic word? Google for it and prove to me if the Hebrew

Lexicon says otherwise. Allah in Hebrew is meant for an OAK TREE, not for the Creator.

Nowhere Allah spoke to Muhammad directly, I am Allah and told him his name is Allah.

In fact, Allah spoke to Moses in the Arabic Quran for 3 times, I am Allah as it is written

in Quran Chapter 20 verse 14, Quran chapter 27 verse 9, and Quran Chapter 28 verse 30.

According to Prophet Moses, he declared about the revealed words of God: The secret things

belong unto YHWH our Elohim: but those things which are revealed, belong unto us and to

our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law. ' Deuteronomy Chapter 29

verse 29.

In Quran Topic Al Imran Chapter 3 verse 81, Muhammad himself said as nowhere Allah said

to him, I am Allah. Behold! Allah took the covenant of the prophets,

saying: "I give you a Book and Wisdom; then comes to you an apostle, confirming what

is with you; do ye believe in him and render him help." Allah said: "Do ye agree,

and take this my Covenant as binding on you?" They said: "We agree." He said: "Then bear

witness, and I am with you among the witnesses. '

A covenant is an irrevocable agreement between God and a prophet or prophets.

Quran Chapter 3 verse 81 is about Muhammad relating Allah is an eyewitness besides the

prophets whom he had chosen as eyewitnesses on the name of God in the scripture of Moses

and in the scripture of wisdom of Jesus Christ written before him.

As Allah had revealed to Moses about his name is Allah, then the Hebrews owned the word

Allah. All Muslims should be ashamed and be called fools, to hate Israel, and yet encroaching

the Hebrew word Allah, since the advent of Islam in 622 A D, as the first year of Islamic

calendar. With all due respect, all Muslims should cease encroaching the Hebrew word Allah,

for your own good since the Creator is never pleased with you for calling a name used for

a created oak tree is the Creator. Do not be so foolish to call the Creator by a name

used for a created oak tree. You can never find any race so foolish and barbaric as the

Muslim terrorists who shout Allah is great when Allah cannot even speak his own name

to Muhammad. What a shame? I speak as a prophet of YHWH and His Spirit

testifies in my spirit that Allah is an oak tree. The Name of the Creator is YHWH and

the name YHWH means the self existing Creator. I repeat YHWH means the self existing Creator

and Allah is the created oak tree. How wonderful is the Name, YHWH, the self existing Creator.

Take a good look at the unedited photographs of Muslims prostrating towards the Kaba house

of idols built before the Quran was fabricated by Caliph Uthman and his team of scribes using

Hasfa Codex as the catalyst. If the Muslims love Yahwah God of Israel, they will face

the holy Dome of the Rock which is believed to be the site where Isaac was placed on the

altar by Abraham to offer him as the sacrifice to Yahwah. But it was just a test for Abraham.

The greatest insult on the holy city of YHWH, is to turn one's back towards it during prayer

to another god called Allah. In fact, Arabic Allah not only encroaches the Hebrew word

Allah but it was used for the moon-god with three intercessors of Allah called Allat,

Al-Uzza and Manat during pre Islamic period. The Arabs also reckoned jinn demons are equal

to Allah based on Quran Chapter 6 verse 100. The evil spirits will never follow Lord Jesus

Christ as they knew who He was, prior to the incarnation or embodiment of the Holy Spirit

on earth. Yet the evil spirits became jinn demons and they had fooled Muhammad and Muslims

with Kaba idolatry and Hajj paganism till today. Nowhere is there a Quranic verse from

Allah for Muslims to prostrate towards the buttock of another Muslims in front of them

as seen in the photo, which is clearly the worship of men.

To conclude, Islam is for the idiots as the Hebrew word allah should never be encroached

by the Arabs. Firstly, Allah never spoke to Muhammad, I am Allah. Secondly, Moses the

Hebrew claimed full ownership of the revelation made to him by Yahwah. Thirdly, the hatred

and violence against non Muslims propagated by Muslims around the world, are against Lord

Jesus Christ who did not advocate to retaliate with hatred but with love and blessing.

I ask YHWH to bless and keep the Hebrews and non Hebrews alike, for YHWH is love and He

does not practice favoritism. Shalom.

For more infomation >> Islam is for Fools as Hebrews owned allah 1,500 Years Prior to Arabic Script! - Duration: 9:19.

-------------------------------------------

City Councilman Wants To Put Homeless To Work As Day Laborers - Duration: 2:05.

For more infomation >> City Councilman Wants To Put Homeless To Work As Day Laborers - Duration: 2:05.

-------------------------------------------

Hollyoaks backlash for Cleo and Joel tonight as Myra opposes their new relationship - Duration: 1:30.

Hollyoaks backlash for Cleo and Joel tonight as Myra opposes their new relationship

Hollyoaks newest couple Joel Dexter and Cleo McQueen face a backlash in tonights E4 first look episode (August 25). The pair finally got together last night as Joel (Rory Douglas-Speed) vowed to leave the church so that he could be with Cleo.

While punters at The Dog cheered in celebration when they watched Joel and Cleo (Nadine Mulkerrin) kissing, you can guarantee that Cleos auntie Myra wont be so supportive when shes brought up to speed tonight.

Myra (Nicole Barber-Lane) cant believe what shes hearing when she learns that Joel has given up on being a priest just to be with Cleo.

Shes also livid to spot them kissing at the McQueen house and isnt shy when it comes to showing her disapproval over the situation. In the end, Cleo gets tough by vowing to move out if Myra cant support her new relationship.

How will Myra respond to Cleos ultimatum? Will Cleo and Joel be strong enough to withstand this early hurdle?.

For more infomation >> Hollyoaks backlash for Cleo and Joel tonight as Myra opposes their new relationship - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

As AFD sends some firefighters to help with the state, back home will still have full coverage - Duration: 2:21.

For more infomation >> As AFD sends some firefighters to help with the state, back home will still have full coverage - Duration: 2:21.

-------------------------------------------

As these cleaning tablets for the toilet you can keep it fresh and clean longer - Duration: 2:15.

Keeping the toilet clean can be a very demanding task, but cleaning this is

something we should not let go of because of the amount of germs it can hold.

But as for everything there is a solution, today in todo en salud we will show you how

to make some pills that just adding them to the toilet will keep you fresh and clean

longer.

The ingredients needed to prepare these tablets are:

- Fragrant oil, in this case I will use lavender

- Hydrogen peroxide - Vinegar

- 60 milliliters of lemon juice about 2 lemons

- 160 grams of baking soda, about 8 tablespoons

Preparing this is very simple, first add the lemon juice to a bowl,

add half a tablespoon of fragrant oil, a spoonful of hydrogen peroxide,

1 tablespoon of vinegar and to finish the baking soda, then start to stir

until Obtain a homogeneous consistency.

It is important that it does not get very liquid, in case it is liquid adds more

sodium bicarbonate until it is allowed to mold.

Then we can start making the pills, in this case use a spoon if you want you

can use another type of mold, the important thing is to be in small pieces, when we have used the whole mixture,

let them dry for 12 hours and then we get our

pills Cleaners.

These can be stored in a glass jar, and added to the toilet water tank

when your bathroom needs some cleaning.

So if you are one of the people who care about keeping the bathroom clean,

do not hesitate to try this recipe and tell us what you think.

We hope this video has been useful, remember that your opinion is very important

so score, comment and share and if you have not subscribed, subscribe to the

daily upload new videos.

For more infomation >> As these cleaning tablets for the toilet you can keep it fresh and clean longer - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Japan to freeze assets of Chinese and Namibian firms as part of N. Korea sanctions - Duration: 1:45.

Japan is set to roll out new sanctions... targeting firms and individuals from China

and Namibia,... with suspected business ties to North Korea.

Tokyo's latest move is part of its unilateral measures to turn up the heat on Pyongyang,...

following its recent test-firing of two ICBMs.

Yu Joonhee reports.

Japanese media is reporting that Tokyo will blacklist six companies and two individuals...

from China and Namibia.

Citing government sources,... the report says the measures are designed to restrict the

movement... of North Korean coal exports and guest workers,... two of the most important

revenue sources for the cash-strapped regime.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's cabinet... is expected to approve the sanctions on Friday,

according to the report.

Tokyo's reported move is seemingly in tandem with that of Washington,... with the Trump

administration on Tuesday,... adding 16 mostly Chinese and Russian entities to its updated

blacklist.

These measures come... after the UN Security Council unanimously adopted a new sanctions

resolution earlier this month... that could slash North Korea's annual exports by a third.

The moves are likely to draw criticism from China however,... which opposes unilateral

sanctions by *any country... outside of the UN framework.

Chinese banks, trading firms, and individuals... have a become a frequent target of these sanctions...

over their alleged, intimate ties to North Korea's nuclear and missile programs.

The two firms based in Namibia, that have come into Tokyo's crosshairs... are believed

to be involved... in the overseas dispatch of North Korean laborers.

In recent years,... Namibia has been forging closer ties with the Kim Jong-un regime,...

with a senior North Korean official having reportedly met with the country's president.

Yu Joonhee, Arirang News.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét