Youtube daily google Aug 9 2017

Was Google wrong to fire anti-diversity memo author?

Google has fired an employee who wrote a controversial memo opposed to diversity programmes and hiring

practices.

The company's chief executive said the "offensive" text advanced "harmful gender stereotypes".

Did Google do the right thing?

First things first: What did the memo say?

A senior Google employee, named in US media as James Damore, argued in an internal memo

that perhaps tech companies that try diversity programmes to get more women in to the industry

are looking at things the wrong way.

It's not just because of recruitment practices or education or discrimination that more men

than women work in the tech industry, he argued, but because of biological differences.

Women are "on average more interested in people" as opposed to things, he said, "more co-operative"

and "more prone to anxiety" - all things that stop them going in to the tech industry or

rising to the top of it.

And he said this couldn't usually be said by people who worked for Google, because of

an "ideological echo chamber" and a "shaming culture and the possibility of being fired".

You can read the full memo here.

After the memo received a few days of international attention, Mr Damore was fired.

He is reported to be considering legal action.

The memo and now his sacking have been much discussed on social media, with some agreeing

with him, some offering him jobs, and others aghast at his views.

Google was wrong to fire him, say some "I think it's wrong for a company to fire

someone for simply expressing their opinion," said Jodie Ginsberg of the Index on Censorship

pressure group.

Asked whether Mr Damore being fired was censorship, she said yes.

"Yes, in that the message it's sending is that people are not free to express their

beliefs and opinions.

The message is we should just shut down the views with which we disagree.

"A much better way is to discuss those opinions openly."

Geoffrey Miller, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of New Mexico, said Google

had gone down in his estimation when it fired Mr Damore.

"It was reasonable of this author to expect that his argument would be respected, that

he would be able to air it with some safety," he said.

"It's just embarrassing for Google," he continued.

"I used to think Google was one of the coolest companies on earth.

I use a lot of their software of all kinds and now I just feel like I'm supporting this

ideological juggernaut.

"If the reaction to being told that you are an ideological echo chamber is that kind of

defensiveness to me it's pretty strong evidence that it probably is biased."

Google was right to fire him, say others On the other hand, says technology writer

and broadcaster Kate Bevan, the memo created a hostile environment for female staff.

"I'm not very keen on the mob going for people to get the sack," she said.

"But in this case he was acting in a way that was detrimental to his colleagues.

"If you stand up and declare in public that you think a large number of your colleagues

are unfit to do the job because of their chromosomes, you're telling your colleagues 'I don't think

you're good enough'."

That echoes the argument made by Google's CEO Sundar Pichai in a letter to staff: "To

suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to

that work is offensive and not OK."

Ms Bevan continued: "The best engineers are not necessarily male.

If you continue to restrict your hiring pool to one type of people you're going to get

some mediocre people in there."

She argued that a more diverse workplace would be better for business, too, saying: "If you've

got a limited workforce you're going to limit the products you make."

So the science he cited - was it legit?

Geoffrey Miller, the evolutionary psychologist, told the BBC that Mr Damore got "most of the

science right" and showed "pretty good judgment about what we know and what we don't know".

He wrote that the memo "would get at least an A- in any Masters psychology course".

But Gina Rippon, the chair of cognitive brain imaging at Aston University in Birmingham,

England, disagreed.

She told the BBC: "The key thing for me is that he's got quite a lot of the science wrong.

"The basis of his argument is wrong.

I don't know who he's been reading."

In fact the author of a study mentioned in the memo has responded to the furore, saying

that using someone's sex to work out what you think their personality will be like is

"like surgically operating with an axe".

Professor Rippon said: "It's one of those areas where science moves on perhaps more

quickly than the communication of it.

"He seems to be suggesting that because something is biological it can't be changed."

She said ability at spatial tasks - often cited as a way in which men and women's brains

work differently - can be affected by how many videogames the people being studied have

played.

And playing more videogames or getting a different environment can influence an individual's

brain.

She continued: "But even if you accepted the idea that there are some biological differences,

all researchers would assert that they're so tiny that there's no way that they can

explain the kind of gender gap that's apparent at Google."

Just 20% of Google's technical roles are filled by women, according to the company's own figures.

Nearly half of non-technical staff are female.

Angela Sain, author of Inferior: How Science got Women Wrong, agreed: "The differences

aren't as big as we think they are and the gender gap as it exists in society is not

explained by biological differences."

But the fact remains that there are many more men than women working in tech companies like

Google.

And a 2016 study of women in Silicon Valley found that half of the women asked had repeatedly

been told they were too aggressive, and nearly half had been asked to do low-level jobs their

male colleagues weren't asked to do, like taking notes or ordering food.

These are issues that Google will undoubtedly turn its attention back to once it has come

down from walking the PR tightrope in the wake of the anti-diversity memo.

For more infomation >> Was Google wrong to fire anti-diversity memo author? - Duration: 6:22.

-------------------------------------------

YouTube ve Google Chrome Geçmiş Temizleme - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> YouTube ve Google Chrome Geçmiş Temizleme - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Facebook Ads Dashboard with Google Data Studio | Lesson 3 - Duration: 29:07.

- Alright, so now that we have prepared our data

in Google Sheets, we are ready to visualize it.

We'll first calculate our metrics,

then lay out our dashboard, and then, finally,

implement our data in Google Data Studio.

All and more coming up right after this.

(upbeat music)

Today our journey starts in Google Data Studio

where we're finally gonna visualize our data

in our dashboard.

Let's start out by clicking on a blank sheet here,

blank new sheet,

and then choosing our data sources.

So we can create a new data source

and we'll choose our Google Sheet.

Now, from our Google Drive account,

we'll pick the sheet that we had prepared

in our last lesson.

Let's do that.

Now we can see that we can actually

choose the different worksheets as a source.

This is actually something that is unfortunate

because you can only choose one worksheet

as one data source.

So you couldn't say okay, I wanna choose

the GA data from here and the Facebook data from here,

and combine it all into one data source.

No, you need to have them on one sheet

in order to make this work.

That's why we prepared the data this way.

Okay, let's go over to Google Sheets

and choose our combined datasheet,

and then we can choose under the options

to use the first row as headers.

That is fine with me.

If you look at the datasheet,

this would describe our data,

so we can pull that in.

And we can include any kind of or filtered cells,

which is not the case in our sheet,

so I can untick this.

You can also choose an optional range

if you have data on that sheet in a special range.

This will be all for us under the configuration.

Let's connect this all.

And we will pull in our different dimensions

and the different metrics.

Now, as you might remember, in our last lesson

we actually prepared that and looked

into the metrics and dimensions

that we want to pull.

Unfortunately, first of all, these are

not exactly the same name that we want

to display them on the actual dashboard,

and therefore I would recommend

to actually rename them right here.

It's pretty easily done.

For example, link clicks should just be clicks.

You can just click on that and change the name around here.

The amount spent will just be our ad spent.

Our transactions are just our conversions,

and our transaction revenue is actually the revenue.

The campaign name, let's rename that in just campaign,

and the ad set, and the ad name can stay the same.

All right.

So now we have renamed our dimensions and metrics,

but we also wanted to calculate some metrics.

So for example, here's the CTR which is

impressions divided by our clicks,

and we can easily input that by going into Google Data.

So we're clicking on this Plus button,

and it will let us input a name,

which in our case was the CTR, the click-through rate,

and then the formula would be impressions,

and it already pops up, our impressions

from down here, divided by our clicks.

Alright, let's create this field,

and it's now part of our dataset.

With calculating metrics, these are custom,

so Google Data Studio doesn't always know

what kind of type it is, and this is actually

a number but it's actually a percentage.

So you need to make sure that you choose that correctly.

We'll auto-aggregate that, that's actually

something we can't really change.

So let's go ahead and do our other calculated metric, CPC.

CPC is the cost per click.

So let's click on the Plus button here,

CPC, and this would be the ad spent

divided by the clicks.

Alright, create this field.

This is a number, that's correct,

but it's also a currency, so we can choose that as well.

Let's pick US dollar here.

And we have all CPC metric.

Let's go ahead and calculate the CPO,

the cost per order.

So let's click on the Plus button,

cost per order, that would be the ad spent

divided by the order transactions.

We called it conversions.

All right.

Create this field.

And we have one more left, return on ad spent.

Return on ad spent.

This would be our ad spent divided by the revenue.

Alright, that should do it.

Now, we have a few more left

that are actually manually inputted.

This is something we could put into our sheet

but it's actually easier to update it manually

in our sheet.

Because sometimes Google Data Studio

can actually pull the data from a sheet

for certain cells.

Okay, we have our data sources ready,

let's add this to our report.

And here we go, now we have that available

in our data sources if we choose to visualize anything.

Right we you see our data range

and our metrics, these are now available here.

Okay, before we start out visualizing anything,

let's get clear on what we are trying to do.

Fortunately, we have prepared a wireframe

in our first lesson, so we know

what we want to build and have an idea

of what elements should be on our dashboard.

So on this dashboard we have kind of like

a three column layout here, and three columns here.

Let's mock that up really quickly in Data Studio,

and we can choose the rectangle tool to do all this,

just so we can get the proportions right.

Because we don't wanna mess with all the layout

later on once we have our data together.

This will make this whole process a whole lot easier.

So let's just mock this up.

So now we have laid out our information,

what goes where, and this is actually also

a great template that we could use later on

if you would like to build a new dashboard.

So you can go ahead and actually make a copy of this

and rename this in some kind of fashion to template

so you have that available later on as well.

Okay, let's continue here with our report.

Let's fill this all with data now.

So we'll go ahead and fill out these panels.

Up here we would have our controls,

so that would be our campaign but also our date picker.

So let's put that in place.

Date picker and filter control.

Right here there's actually a new filter control.

This is for the different views of Google Analytics.

That's not something that we would use here.

Okay, so we can get rid of the panels in the background,

and this should give us capabilities of showing us

the right campaign and the right date.

Let's view this and here we can see

our different campaigns.

There's null.

That is something we would investigate

with our raw data again.

And then we have our date picker,

so that is all working as expected.

Alright, let's continue with these metrics groups here.

Before we start out, I want to actually select

the date range so we are working with dates

that actually make sense for us,

and in our case it would be the July date range.

So I'm just gonna change this to this week here,

and that will make all our data appear

in that realm, and if anything goes wrong here,

we can also adjust it later on.

So let's go ahead and build these metric groups.

Now in our wireframe we see that we have

these groups of acquisition, cost and conversion,

and inside of them we have

these different metrics that are represented

by the actual impressions, the CTR and the clicks,

and then also the comparison if it went up or down

over the last period.

So how do you implement this?

You can do this with the scorecard elements.

So we'll just draw on the canvas here

our scorecard element and choose the right metric,

so in our case it would be impressions.

And we can actually, this is a pretty big number,

go into Style here and press on Compact Numbers,

and this will make this a bit more compact

so we can actually read it.

We want to have our comparison metric,

and for that to actually appear we need

to implement this second date range

so to compare date range, and this should

compare to the previous period.

This will give us this little number.

Now you don't see this actually,

so I'm just gonna change this around

and make the inside transparent.

Okay.

And before we move on and copy this over,

let's style this a bit so we don't have

to do this later on.

We can easily copy it over

and change the data around.

So we want to have our CTR.

That doesn't make any sense so maybe

there's something wrong in our metrics.

Let's create a new metric or go

to this menu and we have here our CTR.

This should be not clicks, impressions,

but clicks divided by impressions.

Okay.

Let's update this field.

And we see our data also changes.

Now we also need to change

that this is actually percentage.

Alright, nice.

So we have that data point and let's copy this over,

and we want to have our clicks.

Alright.

We can go ahead and, again, style this a bit more.

Already have our invisible box here.

Let's style this a bit.

And we have built our first metric group.

Now we can go ahead and just copy that over.

And change labeling and also the metrics.

Here I see we don't have our conversion rate yet.

That's actually something that we overlooked,

so we'd need to go and create a new metric,

and this should be our conversion rate.

So this would be conversions divided by our clicks.

Let's create this field.

And we can choose it in our metric picker.

Oops, we forgot to change the field type.

That would be a percentage.

And here we want to have our revenue.

Notice that the actual panels here have

the description name of the actual metric,

and that's why it was a good idea

to actually rename them at the beginning.

Alright, so let's proceed to these three panels here.

Now the first panel being a goal section

where we would have our ad budget, CPC target,

and CPO target in here and the respective goal reach.

This is a little bit of a manual approach.

Unfortunately you can't make it too dynamic

because you can't actually change the targets

inside of these sections

via Google Data Studio dynamically.

Let's go back here and we'll choose

our bullet chart here that we can just draw in,

and that's about what it will look like.

We can style it a little bit more,

and give the whole thing a name.

And then we can style our bullet chart.

So here's the data point we want to have, our spent,

and we can choose the ranges as well.

So let's do that.

We have three ranges available.

I will just use two ranges here,

first one being from zero

to our respective budget that we wanna hit.

If it goes overboard, so in our case

that would be 15K, and then we can choose

our target, and we have a target of 10K.

That's our monthly budget.

That's why we put it up here as well.

Now we can style this again with a few colors.

We can show where is right now

and the background of that, if it's in a green area,

and just use this green bar.

Unfortunately, you can't change this dynamically

if it is still under the 10K or over the 10K.

Okay, let's build the same thing

for our CPC target and CPO target.

We choose our current CPC as the metric.

Obviously we need to change the scales.

And this is way over budget

so let's change the style here to red,

and give this whole section a name.

And voila, we have our monthly targets now.

If we try this out in the View section,

we could change the date range here,

and we can see for the week what is our budget,

how much did we spend, are we on target here,

is the CPC under our target CPC of 80 cents,

and as we go overboard with the actual acquisition cost

on our orders, which is a bit too high,

so that's something we would need to work on.

Okay, let's go on, we're back here,

and implement our two graphics

for our click versus CPC

and the spent versus the revenue.

This will be a mixed bar and line chart,

so we can choose it up here.

First of all let's choose the metrics.

We had clicks and CPC.

Let's get rid of these metrics,

and that would be clicks and CPC.

And then we choose the scales.

So as a dimension we want to have our date,

and then we just need to style it.

So the first one would be a bar chart,

and the second one would be a line chart.

Right here, now the scales are off

so we choose here that we want to have this,

no, we want to have this on the right,

and now we can see already that it takes shape.

Last but not least we wanna put on again

this title here we have built before,

so let's just mock that

and transfer it.

And again, this should be viewable here

and we can see, when we hover over them,

that what was our CPC and our clicks,

so does that actually correlate,

if we go higher with the CPC, do we get more clicks.

Apparently that's not the case.

Okay, let's go ahead and build our last chart here,

which is our spent versus revenue chart.

This will, again, be a bar chart with a line chart

so we can just copy that over,

and change the metrics around.

I'm gonna change the styling here a bit.

We actually have the spent as a line,

and the revenue as our bars,

and I'm gonna mark them green so we see

okay, this is the money that we made,

and red is the money that we spent.

That looks good.

Now let's put the title on top of that.

The axis here a bit off so, let's see,

let's put this to the right,

and this to the left.

We only need one really, on the left, yeah.

That should be the US dollars here,

and here's the date range.

I would like to have a number so we actually

see the return on ad spent for this week.

So we could just take a panel from here

and change the metrics around.

We want to have the return on ad spent.

We have that right here.

So 0.9.

Hold on, that can actually not quite be

because we have a revenue here of 2.2

and ad spent of 1.9, so it should be actually positive.

Probably I have messed up the metric again.

So let's just go back into our metrics here

and see, that should actually be

revenue divided by ad spent.

So update this field.

This should not be a number but a currency.

No, number's right.

Let's finish this.

And we have an ad spent of 1.2.

Not too good but something that we want to have

on a chart, and this really shows us nicely

how much ad spent we have and how the revenue

went up and down according to the ad spent as well.

Now ideally our revenue would be

much more above this line and the ad spent

would go down accordingly.

So that's not the case but something

we could see in this chart really easily.

Alright, let's go into our last two tables here.

We wanted to have tables

about the campaign overview and the actual ad set.

Whereas I would say this would be better

to make this as an ad set and actually break down

the ads because that's the dimension we would have.

So let me adjust this in our plan right now

and put in our breakdown charts.

So first of all we would again have a title.

This would be our ad set breakdown.

And we would draw in a table here.

Now what data do we want to have in those tables?

As the campaign we want to have actually

the ad set, so let's put that in,

and then we can put in the metrics as well.

We want to know how much clicks

were generated, what conversion rate was,

and then also the orders

and how much money was made.

So we have that now all in one table.

We can adjust a bit of the rows here.

Could even put in more of these metrics.

Also adjust a bit of the styling.

So if you wanted to have some styling in the rows,

you can adjust that here.

Okay.

And so we have a nice ad breakdown

from the ad set basis, so which ad set

performed well and where do we have to adjust.

The same we'll be doing with the ads.

So let's copy over this,

put that into place as well.

Now here we'll actually have ad breakdown.

But with not the ad set, but the actual ad name.

Okay, so these are much more but again,

we can see the conversion rate, the clicks, and so on.

If you wanted to reorder these

'cause actually you wanna see the clicks first,

you can always do it by dragging and dropping that.

So here we go, we have the clicks,

conversion rate, CPO, revenue.

Now, if you want to have a little bit of analysis

in here, you can actually put in some indicators.

For example, if you wanted to know

what is a good conversion rate,

or, let's say, if you wanted to have

instead of the conversion rate actually the CTR,

let's get rid of that and type in our CTR.

Move that upwards.

So we have CTR, the clicks, the CPO and the revenue.

We wanted to know what is good CTR.

We can actually mock that up in our dataset here.

So for the first column,

that's actually the second column,

the first column, we wanted to have a heat map.

So this would mark it up with our default color.

Since the CTR should be something positive,

I would go with green.

To compare that you actually need to have

the impressions as well, so let's put that in.

So here we have impressions that would need to go up.

Alright.

The impressions should not be heat mapped,

but actually the second column here.

Alright.

Let's go with the green color

to indicate positiveness.

And then, we can also put in some

bar charts, as you see in here, bar or pub.

Let's do this for the revenue, so our last column.

A little bit of a comparison.

We can also show the numbers if you choose

or if you have more space here.

But this would give you a quick overview

on what ad is performing well and makes also

a lot of money, and that way you can also

dig deeper into the ad campaign.

This should also work if you go to our view here,

with our actual campaign picker.

So if you only wanted to look at one campaign

and only go on Only, this will change

all the numbers on the whole dashboard

and, hopefully, also our ad set breakdown here,

so we would have that data only on the ad set.

And we could obviously change this around.

Now this is all dependent on the target audience

and how they are using the dashboard.

If they go through and say

I want to dig deeper into my campaign,

we would break it down in this way.

Okay, that's it with the data set up.

Now, we can change a bit around, make this

a bit nicer, so let me do this really quickly.

And we have our completed dashboard.

Now we'll give this all a name.

Share it to the people you want to share it with.

And you are now ready to view this on your account.

(upbeat music)

Alright, so we have made it and now we have

our dashboard ready, outlined.

Isn't that a good feeling?

If you wanna take a look at the finished product

that we have just produced, then you can head over

to MeasureSchool.com/facebookdashboard.

We also have that link up in the description below

and we'll send you a link where you can access that,

copy it, and then implement your own data.

Now in the next lesson we are actually

gonna answer your questions.

So please leave them in the comments below.

We're also gonna recap the course and I'm gonna

give you some more resources to dig into.

Now, if you haven't yet, then you can

consider subscribing right over there

because we'll bring you new videos

just like this one every week.

My name's Julian.

See you in the next lesson!

For more infomation >> Facebook Ads Dashboard with Google Data Studio | Lesson 3 - Duration: 29:07.

-------------------------------------------

Chị Google Xem Video Của Linh Ka Và Những Phát Ngôn Gây Sốc - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> Chị Google Xem Video Của Linh Ka Và Những Phát Ngôn Gây Sốc - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

FIRED! Why Google's Controversial Firing Has Blown Up! Harmful Sexist Stereotypes or Free Speech? - Duration: 15:37.

Sup, you beautiful bastards. Hope you had a fantastic

Tuesday welcome back to the Philip Defranco show and let's just jump into it the first thing we have to talk about today is the

Google Manifesto story that has just blown up

So this story revolves around James D'amour a google engineer who published a 10 page anti Diversity manifesto titled Google's

Ideological echo chain the document shared as an internal memo by D'amour in detailed how the company should focus more on?

Ideological diversity and less on initiatives to hire more women and people of color

Now links to the full Pdf in the description down below

But let's go through the highlights of this thing that has spawned such outrage the document starts off by stating I value diversity and inclusion

I'm not denying that sexism exists and don't endorse using

Stereotypes if we can't have an honest discussion about this then we can never truly solve the problem at Google

We talk so much about unconscious bias as it applies to race and gender

but we rarely discuss our moral biases political orientation is actually a result of deep moral preferences and fuss biases considering that the

overwhelming majority of the social sciences Media and Google Lean left

We should critically examine these prejudices adding only facts and reason can shed light on these biases

But when it comes to diversity and inclusion google's left bias has created a politically correct

Monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence neither side is 100% correct and both Viewpoints are necessary for a functioning

Society or in this case comfort and going on to say on average men and women

Biologically differ in many ways these differences aren't just socially constructed because they often have clear biological causes and links prenatal testosterone

Biological males are castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and Act like males no

I'm not saying that all men differ from women in the following ways or that these differences are just

He then goes deeper and deciding specific differences and challenges for women

Stating women on average have more openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas

women generally also have stronger interest in people rather than things relative to men also interpreted as

Empathizing versus systemising men in a section titled men's higher drive for status. He says we always ask

Why we don't see women in top leadership position?

But we never ask why we see so many men in these jobs these positions often require long

stressful hours that may not be worth it if you want to balance and fulfilling life status is the

Primary metric that men are judged on pushing many men into these higher paying less

Find jobs with a status they entail in on average look for more work-life balance

While men of a higher driver status on average the male gender role is currently

Inflexible any chart offer what he calls non-discriminatory ways to reduce the gender gap saying women on average you a higher interest in people

We can make software engineering more people oriented with pair programming and more collaboration women on average are more cooperative

allow those exhibiting cooperative behavior to thrive James venn lists several discriminatory practices

He says Google is guilty of saying

Programs mentoring in classes only for people with a certain gender or race a high priority queue and special treatment for Diversity candidate hiring practices

Which can effectively lower the bar for diversity candidates by decreasing the false negative rate James also explains?

Why it feels like conservatives are alienated from the conversation writing and highly progressive?

Environments conservatives are a minority that feel they need to stay in the closet to Avoid open hostility James also saying Google should focus on

Psychological safety not just race Gender Diversity writing we should focus on

Psychological safety which has shown positive effects and should not lead to unfair discrimination

Having representative Viewpoints is important for those designing and testing our products

But the benefits are less clear for those more removed from ux user experience design and James also saying he wants google to reconsider making

Unconscious bias training mandatory for promo committee saying we haven't been able to measure any

Effect of our unconscious bias training it is the potential for overcorrecting or backlash

Especially if made mandatory let's spend more time on the many other types of biases besides

Stereotypes and as you'd expect there were many different responses to this some like Haley Ellis tweeting

I experienced this at Google and was frustrated that they did nothing about rhetoric

That was harming employees others called for James D'amour to be fired and for no one else to hire and others like emily

Gorski taking it a step further tweeting. I started reading that googler email and honestly at this point

If I worked there, I would just walk to his desk and beat the shit out of him at this point

I take the assault charge if only for the fucking garbage

biological essentialism

The other side of things you had people

Supporting James even before people knew who wrote this anything that this is just freedom of speech there were articles coming out saying that many

At Google don't actually disagree with James any saying that at Google fired him that this is censorship that the idea of having an open

Work place would be bullshit. That's kind of where the story remained for a minute, but then Google respond Google's Danielle Brown writing Googlers

I'm Danielle Google's, Brand-new VP of Diversity integrity and Governance

I started just a couple of weeks

to go And I had hoped to take another week or so to get the lay of the land before introducing myself to you

I've given the heat of debate we've seen over the past few days

I feel compelled to say a few words so versity and inclusion are a fundamental part of our values in the culture we continue to

cultivate we are

Unequivocal in our belief that diversity and inclusion are critical to our success as a company and will continue to stand for that be committed

To it for the long haul, so essentially google says we're looking into the situation

We want to have a place where people can express their opinions even if we don't agree with them

Well we also need to make sure that no anti-discrimination laws are being violated any of our code conda

I have to say looking to me outside and Google was put into a tough spot here

No matter what they did they were going to get hate so what happened?

Well Google Ceo Sundar Pichai told employees that the memo

Violated Google's code of conduct and from this it sounded like James may have been fired

Which is saying first let me say that we strongly support the right of googlers to express themselves and much of what is in that?

Memo is fair to debate

regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it however

portions of the memo violate our code of conduct and cross the line by Advancing harmful Gender

stereotypes in our workplace our job is to build great products for users that make a difference in their lives to suggest a group of

Our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not okay

it is contrary to our basic values and our code of

Conduct which expects each googler to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment

Imitation is and unlawful discrimination soon after this happened James d'amour did confirm that he had been fired saying he was fired for quote

Perpetuating gender stereotypes adding that he's currently exploring all possible legal remedy and actually on that legal now people have started

Raising money for his legal case one of the fundraisers that has been launched is seeking

$60,000 that has raised at the time of recording this video just under five thousand and then at Left-field

Julian assange pops into the situation and offers James two more a job leading

Censorship is for loozer wikileaks is offering a job to fire Google engineer James D'amour also providing a link to a wikileaks

Article Written by assange title Google is not what it seems then going on to say women and men deserve respect that includes not firing

Them for politely expressing ideas

But rather arguing back then providing a link to an article where four scientists actually agree with James D'amour on the situation

It's around the story

I would love to know what you think do you think that James should have been fired or no?

This is ridiculous you think that James crossed the line here, and so he should have been removed, or is his room

Oh, just an example of what he said at the beginning of his post

I'd love to know your thoughts on this I've seen some really interesting argument but from that. I want to share some stuff

I loved today and today and awesome the first bit of awesome today

I just have to send some love to miss gunn to Chris who oh my God the nation's sometimes very talented

It's created a filly the amiibo with packaging and everything and this isn't just a massaging of my own ego today awesome

Because I found this I went through her archive of photos and she's amazing

She's done a ton of other custom amiibos if you were even remotely into this

I highly recommend you check her out and follow then that youtuber by the name of chet Rio who gave us that fantastic

I am a live remix of Rick and morty

He's back at it again with this week's remix of pickle Rick and an awesome on the dodo

I just had to share that locked himself in a hot car for 30 minutes and videotape the whole thing to show people what happens

To a dog when they're stuck in that heat satur, this is apparently not common sense

But it's good to see people putting this out there then we got a trailer for the movie Mother which Stars Javier Bardem

Jennifer Lawrence Ed Harris, Michelle Pfeiffer

And it looks freaky as all hell if you want to see the full versions of everything

I just share the secret link of the day anything at all

Links is always on the description down below and let's talk about the update around the hBO hack if you don't remember the hacker said

They had 1.5 terabytes of data from HBO some of that included episodes of HBo show the script for game of thrones

Then on Monday the associated press report the hackers had released more internal documents this including around a month worth of emails from Leslie

Cohen the vice president of film Programming odds are at least other Data Admin passwords some contact information

according to the guardian that included personal phone numbers home addresses

Email addresses for game of thrones start along with that the hackers who were going by the name, Mr.

Smith demanded a ransom of at least six million dollars to prevent the release of more files

so demand reportedly reading hBO spends 12 million for market research and 5 millions for games thrown advertisement so consider us another budget for your

Advertisements, I will say even with that threat. I highly doubt that hbo is going to give in to this ransom

I mean there is the argument that once you pay a hacker you that entice other hackers to attack you

I think it's also because we're talking about stolen data something that is digital something that is not tangible

I have this one thing. He gave it back to me

I know 100% that after I pay you you can't still release the same thing. I mean, there's no security for them

That's a it'll be very interesting to see how the story continues to develop. Let's talk about a story

I feel like I've gone out of my way to Avoid

Despite there being a new element to it pretty much every day

And that is Jake Paul a lot that's happened since the stories about him

Maybe getting kicked out of his house

And him definitely not getting dropped by the Disney channel a lot of the things that happen don't necessarily fit into my news show there

Were two things in the two weeks that we have not talked about Jake wood stood out

So the first being that jay Paul got even more backlash because of an interaction

He seemed to have with a fan fan sounds foreign to the United States

He said he's from Kazakhstan and Jay Paul says it sounds like you're just gonna blow someone up

Thank you

Somebody like send the new Corolla outraged, but then Jake Paul also continued to grow through then obviously I mean grow in subscribers

Not as a person

I know is something that actually kind of bothered me on august 5th jay Paul released a music video that definitely wasn't a diss track

According to the title was a diss track. I was at the news or anyone else

He has deemed the hater which I don't know why he's singing

I thought he just dabbed on them in this video Jay Paul one of the fastest growing

YouTubers one of the top YouTubers when people think of youtube more and more people are thinking of him asked the haters where was y'all?

At when I was on email trying to stop the press fans from killing themselves

And here's my favorite where was y'all at when Make-a-wish, hit me to meet my girl Kaley, and that shit changed me

I was lenny most disgusting things I have ever witnessed Jay Paul

just used this little girl who is sick and her wish was to meet Jake Paul for some reason as

Moral capital in my opinion

I understand why people are saying it looked like he used this little girl as a prop

We actually made the video of meeting haley. That's fine

I bet that made her day it brought more awareness to the Make-A-Wish foundation

Which is a fantastic organization, then you use the fact that you did that to show that you're a good person

Why is the news not talking about that hey jake? Maybe it's because you literally met her

24 hours before you released the music video you write that line before you met her or afterwards

You're like wait a second it'll show I'm a good person. That's

Disgusting and I kind of hate that we're even talking about it because it's like obviously it's on a different level this feels like talking

About Jake Paul is kind of like if there was a zombie epidemic and every time I talked about the zombie epidemic

More people became zombies like 98% of people on the same page

But 2% of people would be like but being a zombies savage though

He just add up all those two and three and four percents of audiences, and you have a monster

I don't know how it's gotten to this point

I used to think Jake Paul was just cGI creation to make Logan Paul

Look even better

and then I want to talk about a design studio that has blown up in the news recently because they are trying to reclaim the

Swastika a design group by the name of Ka design launched a line of t-shirts and sweatshirts

featuring the new Swastika with Rainbow colors in the words

love

Peace and Zen they announced this in this fantastic

Video that they released on July 12th on face book called the new Swastika the video knows that the swastika has been used in numerous

Cultures to symbolize peace love luck infinity and life until nazis took the symbol and turned it into hatred fear

War racism and power it goes on to say the nazi stigmatized the swastika forever

They limited our freedom or maybe not and introducing their new design to reclaim the symbol video urging people to wear the freedom closing with

the design studios motto

Questioning boundaries in the immediate response to this some people thought it was a joke others were quick to call the design insensitive

disgusting ignorant somewhere on the fence trying to understand the creators and

10-1 comments

Or writing I get what they are trying to do because the swastika was always a symbol of peace until the nazis started to something

Terrible and the idea is to reclaim it back to what it was so they no longer have the power I do not think slapping

A rainbow on a sWastika is going to do that

I think the damage is too much to ever reclaim another writing trying to reclaim the swastika to be Edgy is an insult to all

The people who lost their lives during the war

I hope you take down that video and issue an apology or your company is going to end up crashing and burning we get what?

You were trying to accomplish, but some things need to stay in the past and be burnt not everything can and should be reclaimed

So there was the initial backlash and then days after K design rework the shirt to include a circle with a slash

over the swastikas

But even after this design change people called for the shirts to be scrapped and many were confused by this complete U-turn the brand went

from reclaiming the Swastika to now selling anti Swastika Merchandise

Then in an attempt to defend the original design idea an unnamed

representative of Ka design spoke with days magazine over the weekend and there they said we really like the symbol and its shape and

Aesthetic so we would love to share the beauty of the symbol detached from the hatred

Associated with it

This project only represents the first step of our master plan and we are excited about what the future will give us we don't consider

Ourselves as skilled fashion designers

But more as artists and free thinkers in general you have some plans for the future that we are not going to reveal we

To be able to extend our swastika last buckets. Sorry. I have to stop. I can't believe I'm reading what I'm reading right now

We hope to be able to extend our swastika line to new design

concepts and colors while keeping our current peace message and the representative also explained that they wouldn't care if mounties purchased the shirt saying we

think the message of our apparel is clear peace love and freedom went over hatred war and prejudice if some kind of

Neo-Nazi goes out wearing our shirt. He will raise the same kind of questions and discussions as a communist wearing the same shirt

that's why we don't care about who buys the shirt then at this point, the

Anti-defamation league gets involved and they took to Twitter writing

This is an offensive use of Nazi imagery action can't reclaim the symbol from Hashtag hate and soon after all of this the shirts were

Taken down and Ta design released a statement where they said hatred and nazism have one we brought out the worst in people

We believe in a world of infinite forgiveness. We forgive everyone and we hope to be forgiven let love prevail

That's the story I'd love to know what you think and I just have to throw out my opinion here the first being that

Apology didn't really seem like an apology hatred and nazism

Have one why because your horrible idea failed also your forgiving people that aren't

Apologizing this apology just reeks of I'm better than you

But I'm going to let it slide because I'm such a good person

I understand the idea of trying to reclaim something take the power away from something that is so negative

I don't see how you're going to do that with clothing that you are going to profit from let's be a part of this movement

That shows love trump's hate and also. It makes me incredibly rich

It seems like the only way that you have got a little leeway here is if all of the profits from these shirts went to

all the different organizations

Of the people that were the victims of hitler and the nazis and so to me that just looks like a disgusting not well thought

Out cash grab. I also feel like the swastika doesn't need to be reclaimed

It does serve a purpose and our time still you see someone wearing the swastika

That's like a giant sign that says hey

I'm the fucking worst, but of course all of this last part is just my opinion

And that's why I passed the question on to you

what is your thought you get what they're trying to do the support or you against that is there a

possibly to try and reclaim the swastika is it something that anyone should even do I've know your thoughts on this that's actually where I'm

going to end today's show remember if you like this video you like what I try and do on this channel that lack button if

You knew where hit that subscribe?

Button also if you missed and want to catch up on yesterday's fill up to Frank will show you can click a tap right there

To watch that or if you want to see the newest behind the scenes blog click a tap right there to watch that

That said of course as always my name is Philip Defranco. You've just been phill'd in. I love you faces, and I'll see you tomorrow

For more infomation >> FIRED! Why Google's Controversial Firing Has Blown Up! Harmful Sexist Stereotypes or Free Speech? - Duration: 15:37.

-------------------------------------------

War Robots 3.0 on Google Play! - Duration: 1:13.

New battle UI — sleek and tidy!

Beacon Rush — new game mode is finally here! Choose where to deploy for even more tactical flexibility!

Fury: +10% durability, +10% speed

Zenit: reload time 22->15 s, min range 300m

Fujin: +10% speed, +10% energy shield durability

Natasha: +10% durability, +10% speed

Rhino: +20% speed

Raijin: +10% speed

Boa: +10% durability

Vityaz: +10% durability

Gl.Patton: +10% durability

Golem: +10% durability

Ecu: durability increased

Jesse: +10% durability

Carnage: energy shield strengthened

Nashorn: +5% damage

Butch: +10% speed

Kang: +10% damage

New paint jobs for Cossack, Gl.Patton, Fujin & Fury!

For more infomation >> War Robots 3.0 on Google Play! - Duration: 1:13.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 AMAZING FACTS About GOOGLE - Duration: 8:27.

Hey YouTube, Jim here!

Welcome to Top10Archive!

Back in 1997, Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed a life-changing program that, within 20 years,

has become a household commodity and the cornerstone of an impressively successful multinational

technology conglomerate.

Google is in our homes, on our phones, and even driving through our neighborhoods, but

do you really know the internet company?

Well, we're happy to provide you a little extra info with these top ten incredible facts

about Google.

Oh yes, and if after watching you find you enjoyed this video, then give it a like.

Leave a comment below, perhaps about another interesting fact related to Google.

And search for and click the bell to be notified automatically whenever we upload a new video.

10.

World's Most Valuable Since 2011, Apple had dominated the world

of branding with an approximate brand value of $145 billion.

After failing to impress the market and consumers with its line of technologies, by 2017, the

multinational technology company dropped to the second most valuable brand in the world

with its value slipping to $107 billion.

With $109 billion backing its name, Google delightfully stepped in as the world's most

valuable brand, for now.

9.

Employee Benefits You may think that your bi-weekly company

lunch is just the bee's knees, but it may pale just a little in comparison to the benefits

Google bestows upon its employees.

In fact, there are so many that we won't get to cover them all, but Google employees

are known for enjoying a dog-friendly work environment, free massages, gym access and

fitness classes, 18 weeks maternity and six weeks paternity leave with bonuses, access

to financial advisors, and family death benefits that pay out for 10 years after the employee's

passing.

Maybe even more important is the constant access to food and free Google-themed condoms!

8.

BackRub No, no.

We're not referencing one of the company's many employee perks.

Before Google was, well, Google, it was a much smaller company, not even on the radar.

It also wasn't even called "Google".

Fans of wordplay, Page and Brin opted to call their newly formed entity "BackRub," referencing

how their program evaluated "back links" to determine a website's reputation and

filter other related sites.

In 1997, the Google name was born – but that's a story for a different time.

7.

What's in a Name Okay, so that time is now.

If you've ever wondered where "Google" came from, it actually stemmed from a slip-up

by Stanford University student Sean Anderson, who stepped in when the minds behind BackRub

wanted a name change.

Anderson initially suggested "googol," or the long-form number of 10100, but while

searching the domain availability of googol.com, slipped and typed in Google.com, which caught

Page's attention.

On September 15th, 1997, Google.com was official registered.

Fun fact, Google hates when the term "googling" or any variation of it is used to refer to

the act of performing a web search unless you're actually using Google.

6.

Goats of Google Back in 2009, Google was making headlines

for its unique method in lawn care – goats!

At its Mountain View, California headquarters, Google's director of real estate and workplace

services Dan Hoffman enlisted the services of local company California Grazing to tend

to the property.

Rather than send a team of green-thumbs, California Grazing provided Google with 200 goats, a

herd of natural lawnmowers that spent a week at a time grazing and fertilizing the surrounding

property while at the same time providing a cleaner and quieter alternative to typical

landscaping companies.

Of course, PETA involved themselves, raising concerns about transportation, shelter, and

veterinary care of the goats.

5.

Selling Google Before Google was worth billions, Page and

Brin weren't intending on it being a long-term project.

Instead, the two were ready to sell off their creation in 1999 to what was then the number

two search engine, Excite.com.

With a price tag of $750,000, Excite had shown interest in Google, but when Page mentioned

the stipulation that all of Excite's technology would need to be replaced by Google's, the

deal fell through.

A year earlier, the Stanford students approached Yahoo with a $1 million offer for PageRank,

which became the meat and potatoes of Google.

Ultimately, Yahoo declined… and has regretted it ever since... evident by their failing

YouTube channel..

<Oh, the irony..>

4.

Company Acquisitions In the beginning, there was just little 'ole

Google.

Then, in 2015, the internet powerhouse went through a restructuring to form the parent

company, Alphabet, Inc., with Page and Brin filling the seats of CEO and president, respectively.

You may be wondering why the need for a blanket company, and the answer lies within the some

200 smaller companies that Google has acquired over the years.

Boston Dynamics, reCAPTCHA, Owlchemy Labs, Jetpac, and Motorola Mobility were just a

few of the notable purchases, though the robotics company, Boston Dynamics, was put up for sale

in March of 2016 for lack of revenue.

3.

Calico In 2013, Google joined forces with Apple chairman

and former chief executive officer and chairman of biotechnology corporation, Genentech, Inc.,

Arthur D. Levinson to form Calico.

Since its success, the web tech company has invested in many ventures, but Calico, short

for California Life Company, may be one of its most notable shifts away from search engines

and the internet.

Calico's main focus has been combating aging and age-related diseases, focusing heavily

on cancer and neurodegeneration.

Research performed within Calico's facilities is done within a secretive fog, with reps

for the company remaining incredibly vague about the actual science behind its anti-aging

efforts.

2.

Google Failures Even the greatest of minds are bound to fail,

and for every genius implement Google has, it also must face its collection of missteps.

One of its most notable failed products was meant to give Facebook a run for its money,

but Google+ never took off.

Despite having over 2.5 billion registered users - most of which being forced registrations

from YouTube - an estimated 90% of them have never used the program's more social aspects.

Google+ wasn't even Google's first attempt at social networking as it struggled to launch

Google Buzz, Dodgeball, and Orkut.

Google also attempted to revolutionize wearable technology with Google Glass, a pair of smartglasses

that showed promise but failed to deliver on the consumer level.

1.

Lunar X Prize Everybody wants to know more about our Solar

System, but Google is willing to pay over $20 million to actually get results.

Launched in 2015, the Google Lunar XPRIZE competition sought to pit a series of teams

against one another in a privately funded space race.

Each team was charged with launching a lunar robot that could travel across the moon's

surface for 1,640 ft (500 m) and transmit high-def imaging and video.

Thirty-four teams entered the competition but by 2017, only five remained and were under

contract to launch.

The teams have until the end of 2017 to launch their craft in order to be eligible for the

$20 million first prize.

For more infomation >> Top 10 AMAZING FACTS About GOOGLE - Duration: 8:27.

-------------------------------------------

KHI CHỊ GOOGLE XEM VÀ PEWPEW DIZZ LINH KA TRẤT VCL - Duration: 10:18.

For more infomation >> KHI CHỊ GOOGLE XEM VÀ PEWPEW DIZZ LINH KA TRẤT VCL - Duration: 10:18.

-------------------------------------------

¡Un empleado de Google despedido por ser machista! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> ¡Un empleado de Google despedido por ser machista! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Despiden de Google al ingeniero que publicó un comunicado en contra de las mujeres - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Despiden de Google al ingeniero que publicó un comunicado en contra de las mujeres - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Hey, ladies! Google wants YOU! - The Feed - Duration: 2:02.

For more infomation >> Hey, ladies! Google wants YOU! - The Feed - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Gender Memo - Duration: 0:23.

For more infomation >> Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Gender Memo - Duration: 0:23.

-------------------------------------------

Google Fires Engineer For Women In Tech Memo - Duration: 17:32.

EXECUTIVES AT

GOOGLE MADE THE DECISION TO FIRE AN ENGINEER WHO

WROTE A MEMO, QUESTIONING WOMEN IN TECH.

NOW, I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE WAY THAT THIS STORY HAS BEEN

REPORTED IN THE NEWS, AND I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT EVERYONE

ACTUALLY READ THE MEMO THAT HAS BEEN CONTROVERSIAL, BECAUSE

YOU MIGHT HAVE A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE THAN WHAT THE

MEDIA IS TELLING YOU.

BUT I DO HAVE THE RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THAT MEMO FOR YOU,

AND THEN WE WILL HAVE A DISCUSSION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT

HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED.

THE ENGINEER IS JAMES DAMORE -

THERE HE IS ñ AND AGAIN, HE IS THE ONE WHO PUT OUT THIS

MEMO INTERNALLY, AND GET FIRED AS A RESULT.

THE MEMO DID GO VIRAL, AND IT SPECIFICALLY HAD TO DO WITH

DIVERSIFYING THE WORKPLACE, AND TRYING TO BE MORE INCLUSIVE

OF WOMEN IN TECH.

THE MEMO, CALLED GOOGLE'S IDEOLOGICAL ECHO CHAMBER, RELIED

ON CERTAIN GENDER STEREOTYPES ñ LIKE THE NOTION THAT WOMEN ARE

LESS INTERESTED IN HIGH STRESS JOBS BECAUSE THEY ARE MORE

ANXIOUS ñ TO RATIONALIZE THE GENDER GAP IN THE TECH INDUSTRY.

SO, LOOK, THAT IS ñ I'M GOING TO KEEP IT REAL, THERE IS

RESEARCH INDICATING THAT WOMEN ON AVERAGE SUFFER FROM ANXIETY

MORE THAN MEN DO, AND IT'S BECAUSE OF HORMONAL DIFFERENCES.

I CONSIDER MYSELF SOMEONE WHO IS IN FAVOR OF EQUALITY, SOMEONE

WHO WAS IN FAVOR OF DIVERSITY IN THE WORKPLACE, BUT I DON'T

BELIEVE THAT IS NECESSARILY A STEREOTYPE, BECAUSE THERE IS

SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO BACK THAT UP; HOWEVER ñ WE'LL HAVE A

DEBATE ABOUT THAT IN JUST A 2ND.

LET ME GIVE YOU MORE OF WHAT HE WROTE.

HE WROTE THAT, "OPEN ESTIMATED TOWARD FEELINGS AND STATICS

RATHER THAN IDEAS.

WOMEN GENERALLY HAVE A STRONGER INTEREST IN -- "

SO, HE LISTS THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN, AND

HE DOES SAY THROUGHOUT THE MEMO, THESE ARE GENERALIZATIONS,

SO IT'S NOT TO SAY THAT EVERY WOMAN IS LIKE THIS, BUT

GENERALLY SPEAKING, HERE ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND

WOMEN, AND IT IS PLAYING A ROLE IN THE GENDER GAP BETWEEN

MEN AND WOMEN IN DETECT INDUSTRY.

LATER ON IN HIS MEMO, HE DESCRIBED WHAT COULD BE DONE TO

MITIGATE THE DIFFERENCES, SO YOU CAN BE MORE INCLUSIVE OF WOMEN,

BUT AGAIN, HE SAYS THAT, YOU KNOW, WOMEN ARE MORE INTERESTED

IN THE AESTHETICS, AND BEING PEOPLE PLEASERS.

THAT, I THINK IS A STEREOTYPE, BUT WE WILL CONTINUE.

HE SAYS THAT WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT FROM MEN IN THAT THEY BELIEVE IN

EXTRAVERSION EXPRESSED AS GREGARIOUSNESS , RATHER THAN

ASSERTIVENESS.

ALSO, HIGHER AGREEABLENESS.

LOOK, LOOK, WE ARE GOING TO THE WORST PARTS HERE BECAUSE I

THINK THAT IS A LOAD OF CRAP, I THINK THAT WAS THE WORST

PART OF HIS MEMO.

I THINK THE MEMO WAS MORE INTERESTING THAT PEOPLE ARE

LETTING ON.

I LIKE THE MEDIA TELLING ME WHAT I SHOULD THINK ABOUT IT.

I READ THE ORIGINAL MEMO, AND I READ IT WITH AN OPEN MIND

BECAUSE I WANTED TO SEE WHERE HE WAS COMING FROM.

THE WAY THE MEDIA IS COVERING IT MAKES IT SEEM AS THOUGH IT

WAS THIS MEMO THAT IS JUST INSULTING WOMEN, AND MAKING

THEM OUT TO BE BIOLOGICALLY OR GENETICALLY INFERIOR TO MEN.

THERE ARE SOME GENERALIZATIONS THAT I DISAGREE WITH;

HOWEVER, HE IS TRYING TO SHOW THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENCES

BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN, AND IF WE WANT TO BE MORE INCLUSIVE

OF WOMEN IN THE WORKPLACE, HERE ARE SOME THINGS WE CAN CONSIDER.

IT WASN'T THIS MEMO WHERE HE WAS LIKE, WOMEN SUCK, I WANT

THEM IN THE TECH INDUSTRY, AND THAT IS THE WAY THE MEDIA

IS REPORTING IT, AND ADVOCATES UNFAIR.

I'M MORE MIXED ON IT THEN YOU ARE.

MANY FIRST TALK ABOUT THE POSITIVES.

HE TALKS ABOUT LEFT-WING BIAS, BUT HE ALSO TALKS ABOUT

RIGHT-WING BIAS.

HE IS NOT AN UNSOPHISTICATED THINKER, RIGHT?

SO WITHOUT A KNUCKLEHEAD ONLINE GOING, MEN HAVE IT SO BAD, YOU

KNOW, JUST ñ

NON-INTELLECTUAL ARGUMENTS, THAT ARE STEREOTYPES, ETC.

AND SOMETIMES HE CITES STATS, LIKE, MEN, BY THE WAY, SUFFER

90% OF WORK-RELATED DEATHS, SO THEY ARE PICKING JOBS THAT

ARE IN SOME WAYS, CERTAINLY DIFFERENT THAN WOMEN.

THAT IS AN INTERESTING POINT, AND THAT IS A STATISTIC,

YOU CAN INTERPRET IT IN DIFFERENT WAYS BUT YOU

DON'T FIRE SOMEONE FOR CITING A STAT.

HE SAYS THINGS LIKE, FEMINISM HAS MADE GREAT PROGRESS IN

FERRYING WOMEN FROM THE GENDER ROLE, BUT MEN ARE STILL

VERY MUCH TIED TO THE GENDER ROLE.

IF WE ALLOW MEN TO BE MORE FEMININE THAN THE GENDER

GAP WILL SHRINK.

THAT'S ANOTHER INTERESTING POINT.

HERE'S ANOTHER INTERESTING POINT FROM ONE OF HIS FOOTNOTES.

MEN ARE RESPONDED TO BE STRONG AND DEAL WITH PROBLEMS ON

THEIR OWN.

MEN'S PROBLEMS ARE OFTEN SEEN AS PERSONAL FAILINGS, RATHER

THAN VICTIMHOOD.

THIS DISCOURAGES MEN FROM BRINGING ATTENTION TO THEIR

ISSUES.

PERFECTLY FINE POINT, OKAY?

SO, IT'S AN INTERESTING MEMO, IN THOSE REGARDS, BUT, I THINK THAT

WHEN HE GETS INTO THE SO-CALLED BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN

MEN AND WOMEN, THAT'S WHERE I THINK HE TOTALLY GOES OFF

THE RAILS.

SO, IT'S ONE THING TO CITE THE STAT ABOUT WORK-RELATED DEATHS,

THAT'S A PERFECTLY FINE STAT, AND MAKES SENSE, AND IT'S

AN INTERESTING CONVERSATION TO HAVE AROUND THAT STAT.

WHY ARE MEN USING CERTAIN JOBS?

AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS ON THE SHOW, THE $.77 THAT WOMEN

MAKE ON THE DOLLAR FOR MEN IS NOT FOR THE SAME JOB, THERE ARE

A TON OF FACTORS THAT YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT HOLISTICALLY, BUT

WHEN HE STARTS GETTING INTO THINGS LIKE, WOMEN LIKE

THINGS AND GUYS LIKE IDEAS.

THAT IS NOT BACKED BY OVERWHELMING RESEARCH.

YOU CAN'T GENERALIZE LIKE THAT, BASED ON WEAK SAUCE.

THERE WAS ONE STUDY I KIND OF THOUGHT THAT THAT.

THAT IS NOT A CONCLUSION YOU CAN REACH.

BUT WE JUMP IN, BECAUSE, THE THING IS, YOU ARE RIGHT, HE

MAKES GOOD POINTS THAT I THINK SHOULD HAVE LED TO A

DISCUSSION WITHIN THE COMPANY, AS OPPOSED TO GOOGLE

FREAKING OUT, AND THEN IMMEDIATELY FIRING HIM

BECAUSE THEY GOT A LITTLE BUT OF CRITICISM, RIGHT?

HOWEVER, I DO AGREE WITH YOU THAT THERE WERE GENERALIZATIONS

THERE THAT ARE NOT BACKED UP BY EVIDENCE; THERE WERE POINTS MADE

ABOUT THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN THAT ARE BACKED BY

EVIDENCE, THE ANXIETY POINT BEING ONE OF THEM.

HERE IS ONE THING THAT I CAN REALLY DISAGREE WITH.

SO, HIS ARGUMENT IS, WELL, MEN ARE JUST MORE ASSERTIVE

THAN WOMEN, WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO GET PAID

MORE, THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO GET HIRED FOR THESE

POSITIONS, AND LOOK, THAT IS NOT A BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN.

THAT IS A SOCIAL CONDITIONING ISSUE, BECAUSE WHEN A WOMAN IS

ASSERTIVE, WHEN A WOMAN IS STRONG, WHEN A WOMAN IS

AGGRESSIVE, THE WAY SOCIETY TREATS HER IS VERY DIFFERENT

FROM THE WAY SOCIETY TREATS A MAN WHO IS JUST AS

AGGRESSIVE OR ASSERTIVE.

AND SO, WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT THAT IS AN ISSUE AS WELL.

AND BY THE WAY, I'M NOT DENYING AT ALL THAT THERE IS AN

ISSUE WITH SEXISM IN THE TECH INDUSTRY, I ACTUALLY

EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND WHEN I MODERATED A PANEL AT A

CONFERENCE CALLED COLLISION, IN NEW ORLEANS.

I HAD TO MODERATE A PANEL WITH TWO SILICON VALLEY CEOS, AND

THEY WERE HORRENDOUS TO ME, ON STAGE; WOULD NOT LET ME

SPEAK, INSULTED ME IN FRONT OF A CROWD OF PEOPLE, AND I

CANNOT BELIEVE THE WAY THAT THEY TREATED ME THERE.

SO I'M NOT GOING TO DENY THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE, BUT WHAT

I WANT IS A DIALOGUE, AND UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU

IMMEDIATELY FIRE HIM, AND DON'T HAVE THAT DIALOGUE, I DON'T

BELIEVE THAT LEADS TO REAL PROGRESS.

DON'T GET ME WRONG, HE IS NOT A MODERATE, HE IS DEFINITELY

ON THE CONSERVATIVE END OF THE SPECTRUM.

HE CALLS HIMSELF A CLASSIC LIBERAL, WHICH MEANS

CONSERVATIVE, THAT IS AN EXCUSE PEOPLE USE.

HE'S, IN ESSENCE SAYING WOMEN ARE PERCEIVED TO BE WEAK,

AND NEED TO BE PROTECTED, HENCE WE DO ALL THESE DIVERSITY

PROGRAMS FOR THEM, ETC.,

AND ALL THAT IS AS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

WHAT COULD BE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED.

NOW, THAT IS CONTEXT, AND IT SHOULD BE SOMETHING

DISCUSSED AND DEBATED AS TO HOW TO ADDRESS THAT.

SO, FOR EXAMPLE, WHY DID WE DO CIVIL RIGHTS AND

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE FIRST PLACE?

BECAUSE WHITES HAD ALMOST ALL THE JOBS, AND

UNDERSTANDABLY THEY WOULD WANT TO GIVE IT TO THEIR KIDS.

SO YOU ARE A LONGSHOREMAN, AND YOU WANT TO GIVE IT TO YOUR KID.

IN ORDER TO DO THAT, THAT LET BLACKS HAVE A JOB BECAUSE YOU

WANT TO GIVE IT TO YOUR KIDS.

AND THEN YOU CAN SAY, YOU ARE LETTING MY KID HAS A JOB,

YOU ARE IS COMMITTING AGAINST ME.

NO, THERE HAS BEEN HISTORICAL DISCRIMINATION, AND THERE

HAS BEEN AGAINST WOMEN AS WELL.

SO I DON'T AGREE WITH HIS FRAMING, AND HE TALKS ABOUT HOW

SAFE SPACES CREATE A PSYCHOLOGICALLY UNSAFE

ENVIRONMENT FOR MEN.

SO, OKAY, THAT'S FASCINATING.

AGAIN, I'M NOT SAYING THE GUY IS A MONSTER, BUT IF I'M THE BOSS I

HAVE TO SAY, HEY LISTEN, IF YOU WANT IS NOT A CONVERSATION ABOUT

THE DISPARITIES THAT COULD LEAD TO A DIFFERENT PAY SCALE, AND

HAVE A CONVERSATION AROUND WHAT JOBS WOMEN SEEK, ETC.,

THAT IS AN INTERESTING, INTELLECTUAL DEBATE, AND

I'M NOT ONE TO FIRE YOU OVER THAT, EVEN IF IT'S AGAINST

OUR COMPANY POLICIES, ETC.

BUT WHEN YOU IMPLY THAT WOMEN ARE WEAK, AND ANA, YOU

KNOW, THERE IS A TINY BIT OF RESEARCH ON THE ANXIETY

THING, IT IS NOT CONCLUSIVE, SO I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU

THERE, AND THE WAY HE FRAMED IT IS EVEN WORSE.

HE SAYS, NEUROTICISM AMONG WOMEN.

SO, NOW, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?

IF WE SAY THAT IS AN OKAY THING TO SAY, NOW AT A MEETING,

WHEN A WOMAN SAYS SOMETHING, AND WE HAVEN'T TAKEN ANY ACTION

ON THIS, THEN, OKAY, ARE PEOPLE WONDERING, IS IT BECAUSE

SHE'S NEUROTIC?

IS IT BECAUSE SHE'S WEAK?

OR IS SHE JUST BEING AGREEABLE?

RIGHT?

I KNOW, BUT HERE'S THE THING, I THINK UNFORTUNATELY THE WAY THAT

COMPANIES REACT TO THESE TYPES OF MEMOS, OR THESE TYPES OF

COMMENTS, AND NOT BEING COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

BECAUSE I AGREE WITH YOU, THERE WERE THINGS WRITTEN THERE THAT I

DISAGREE WITH, BUT I MUCH MORE INTERESTED IN HAVING A

CONVERSATION ABOUT IT, THAN GET HIM OUT OF THAT CONVERSATION,

THEN PRETENDING LIKE THAT TYPE OF IDEOLOGY DOESN'T EXIST,

BECAUSE IT DOES EXIST, AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WORKING AT

SCHOOL RIGHT NOW WHO COMPLETE THE AGREE WITH THAT MEMO.

IF THEY THINK THAT PROBLEM IS NOW GONE BECAUSE THEY FIRED

HIM, THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG.

AND BY THE WAY, I LOOKED INTO THE ANXIETY THING, BECAUSE

I WANT TO ACCEPT IT, I'M A WOMAN, I DON'T WANT TO

ACCEPT THAT I'M MORE LIKELY TO SUFFER ANXIETY COMPARED TO MEN.

BUT IT WAS NOT JUST SOME MAYBE RANDOM STUDY, IT WAS A

STUDY DONE BY A RESEARCHER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

CAMBRIDGE; THEY FOUND, THROUGH THEIR RESEARCH, THAT WOMEN

ARE PLACE AS LIKELY TO SUFFER FROM ANXIETY, AND IT IS

SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE OF HORMONAL DIFFERENCES.

BUT IS JUST ONE STUDY, ANA, AND I'M NOT DISMISSING THE

STUDY, BUT YOU CANNOT DRAW BACK INTO CONCLUSIONS, AND THEN

BASE YOUR HIRING DECISIONS, OR ARGUE THAT YOUR HIRING

DECISIONS SHOULD BE BASED ON JUST ONE STUDY.

I AGREE WITH YOU ON THAT, BUT AGAIN, THAT'S WHY IT'S

IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE CONVERSATION.

I KNOW, LOOK, BUT IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT.

I ARGUE THAT RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOULD NOT BE FIRED WHEN HE

SAID OUTRAGEOUS THINGS.

I ARGUED EXACTLY, BRING THEM IN, LET'S HAVE A CONVERSATION.

WHETHER IT'S THE RIGHT OR THE LEFT.

AL SHARPTON, I DISAGREE WITH HIM PLENTY, I DON'T THINK HE

SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED.

BUT THEY ARE NOT DOING TALK SHOWS, WHICH IS THE WHOLE

POINT OF A TALKSHOW, IS TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS.

THE WHOLE POINT OF MEDIA IS, I THINK, TO HAVE THESE

DISCUSSIONS.

WE AGREE THAT CONSERVATIVE SPEAKERS SHOULD COME ON

COLLEGE CAMPUSES, THAT IS AN AREA WHERE WE ARE OPEN TO

HAVING A CONVERSATION.

THIS IS DIFFERENT, THIS IS A PRIVATE WORK ENVIRONMENT

WHERE IT IS SUPER IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO BE ABOUT TO ATTRACT

TOP LEVEL TALENT, WHO ARE BOTH MALES AND FEMALES.

IF YOU DON'T TAKE ACTION ON THIS GUY ñ

NOW, LET'S THINK ABOUT IT THIS WAY: LET'S SAY IT'S NOT MEN

AND WOMEN, BUT HE WROTE THE SAME MEMO ABOUT WHITES AND BLACKS,

AND HE SAID I HAVE THE EVIDENCE THAT BLACKS ARE MORE EROTIC.

HE DID NOT SAY THAT, SO I'M NOT TRY TO HAVE YOU HOLD THAT

AGAINST HIM, I'M JUST GIVING YOU AN ANALOGY FOR WHAT WOULD

YOU DO IN THAT CIRCUMSTANCE?

NOW, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN ARE MORE SIGNIFICANT

BETWEEN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RACES, SO I'M NOT IMPUGNING IT

ON HIM, BUT IF YOU WROTE THAT MEMO, YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO

FIRE HIM, RIGHT?

YES, OKAY, BUT, THERE ARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND

WOMEN, RIGHT?

THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS THAT WOMEN HAVE, YOU KNOW,

AND THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS THAT MEN HAVE.

SO, FOR INSTANCE, WHEN IT COMES TO IQ, ANYONE COMES YOU AND SAYS

THAT MEN HAVE BETTER IQ, NO.

IN TERMS OF THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE FACTOR, WE ARE THE

SAME.

BUT THERE ARE DIFFERENCES.

SO, WHEN IT COMES TO SPATIAL REASONING, MULTIPLE STUDIES

HAVE INDICATED THAT MEN ARE BETTER WITH SPECIAL

REASONING, BUT THERE ARE OTHER THINGS THAT WOMEN ARE

ACTUALLY STRONGER THAN MEN ON.

AND SO, LOOK, I THINK THAT WE ACTUALLY DO A DISSERVICE WILL BE

PRESENT LIKE, MEN AND WOMEN ARE COMPLETELY THE SAME.

THERE ARE DIFFERENCES, AND IF WE WERE TO HAVE A GENUINE

CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW TO IMPROVE THE WORKPLACE OF THAT

THERE IS EQUALITY, WE NEED TO KEEP THOSE DIFFERENCES IN MIND.

THAT IS NOT TO SAY THAT WOMEN OR MEN ARE LESS THAN, BUT WE HAVE

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES THAT WE SHOULD CELEBRATE AND TALK ABOUT,

AND UNFORTUNATELY WE DON'T TALK ABOUT IT, AND I THINK IT IS A

DISSERVICE, AND IF YOU GUESS THE REASON WHY COMPANIES LIKE GOOGLE

HAVE NOT SOLVED THEIR EQUALITY ISSUE.

IT'S DIFFERENT SITUATIONS.

THAT COMPOSITION SHOULD BE HAD HERE, IT SHOULD BE HAD ON

CONSERVATIVE TALK SHOWS, IT SHOULD BE HAD ON, YOU KNOW,

ON TV AND COLLEGE CAMPUSES, ETC.,

BUT GOOGLE IS A PRIVATE COMPANY, AND THEY HAVE AN ENORMOUS

NUMBER OF WOMEN WORKING THERE, WHO NOW FEEL LIKE THEY ARE

GOING TO BE JUDGED AT EVERY MEETING, IF THIS IS

CONSIDERED WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE IDEAS.

NOT BECAUSE OF POLITICS, BUT BECAUSE THIS GUY IS SAYING THAT

WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICALLY NOT RIGHT FOR THESE JOBS, AND IF YOU

SAY, YET ACCEPTABLE, THAT'S TOTALLY FINE, THEN WHAT

HAVE YOU TOLD THOSE WOMEN?

AND EVEN IF YOU THINK THAT IS AN OKAY IDEA, WELL, WHAT HAVE

YOU DONE TO 40% OF THE WORKFORCE?

OR WHATEVER IT IS.

AND BY THE WAY, IF YOU ARE RUNNING A COMPANY, HOW

ABOUT YOUR CLIENTS, YOUR CUSTOMERS?

WHO ARE 50% WOMEN.

YOU HAVE TO TAKE THOSE THINGS INTO ACCOUNT.

LET ME BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR, I DO NOT AGREE THAT WOMEN ARE NOT FIT

FOR THOSE JOBS, SO FOR ANYONE WHO MIGHT THINK THAT, I WANT TO

MAKE SURE I CLARIFY THAT, AND I GET YOUR POINT; THERE SHOULD BE

SOME CONSEQUENCE, ESPECIALLY IF IT IS DISCOURAGING WOMEN IN

THE WORKPLACE, IF THEY FEEL LIKE THEY ARE BEING JUDGED, OF

COURSE, BUT IMMEDIATELY GOING TO FIRING HIM, I THINK IT GOES

TOO FAR.

YES, IF YOU WANT TO SUSPEND HIM MAYBE, THAT MAKES SENSE TO ME,

BUT I DON'T THINK WHAT HE WROTE WAS MEANT TO LIKE, DESTROY WOMEN

IN THE WORKPLACE.

I JUST THINK THAT IT'S BEING PAINTED THAT WAY, AND

UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE OF THE WAY IT'S BEEN HANDLED, I DON'T THINK

THAT AN IMPORTANT CONVERSATION THAT SHOULD HAPPEN

INTERNALLY IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

WE CAN AGREE ON THIS: IN AN IDEAL WORLD, IF I'M THE

CEO, I PULLED HIM IN, AND I HAVE FEMALE EXECUTIVES THERE AS

WELL, AND WE HAVE A CONVERSATION, AND WE GO, HE

LET ME UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WERE TRYING TO SAY, AND DRILL

DOWN, WHAT RESEARCH ARE YOU BASING THIS ON?

AND CAN YOU SEE HOW CALLING WOMEN ñ IT APPEARS THAT YOU ARE

CALLING WOMEN NEUROTIC IN GENERAL, AND THAT THAT IS

SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD REASONABLY TAKE OFFENSE AT.

YOU ARE ASKING FOR A PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFE SPACE FOR

MEN, BUT LOOK AT WHAT YOU JUST DID TO ALL THE WOMEN WHO WORK AT

GOOGLE.

WHATEVER CONVERSATION, AND MAYBE HE'S GOT GREAT ANSWERS, AND

THEN YOU GLAD YOU DO THAT BE IN FRONT OF ALL OF GOOGLE.

BUT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE GREAT ANSWERS, I THINK YOU'VE GOT

TO TAKE ACTION.

THAT'S FAIR, I AGREE WITH THAT.

For more infomation >> Google Fires Engineer For Women In Tech Memo - Duration: 17:32.

-------------------------------------------

Kyra Kyles: "Diversify or Die: Why News Outlets Must Mirror Their Audience" | Talks at Google - Duration: 55:55.

For more infomation >> Kyra Kyles: "Diversify or Die: Why News Outlets Must Mirror Their Audience" | Talks at Google - Duration: 55:55.

-------------------------------------------

Google Software Engineer Dismissed After Comments - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> Google Software Engineer Dismissed After Comments - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

Technology News : Pixel 2 leak: Google's 2017 flagship phone belongs in 2016 - Duration: 2:42.

Pixel 2 leak: Google's 2017 flagship phone belongs in 2016

When HTC announced the U11 back in May, BGR had a chat with the company about one of the worst aspects of the phone's design.

Rather than adopt a newer configuration that maximizes the display-to-body ratio, HTC's new flagship phone still had massive bezels above and beneath the screen.

When we asked HTC why it stuck with the dated design, the company explained that it was due in large part to the fact that HTC doesn't have its own display arm like Samsung and LG.

These companies can develop new display technology that is custom tailored to their needs. Meanwhile, as a small phone vendor, HTC has no choice but to stay behind the curve a bit when it comes to certain components.

The huge bezels on the U11 are a bit of a disappointment on an otherwise stunning smartphone. And now, Android fans will get to relive that disappointment when Google's new Pixel 2 hits store shelves in the coming months.

As has been rumored, it looks like the new HTC-made Pixel 2 will have huge bezels just like last year's model.

Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL leaks have kicked into high gear lately, which makes sense as we draw closer to the phones' unveiling in the coming months.

Just yesterday we saw real-life photos of Google's Pixel 2 for the first time, though they weren't the best quality since they were spy shots.

Today, a blog called Phone Arena has taken what it claims are "CAD blueprints and leaked live photos of the device," and used them to create renders of the Google Pixel 2.

While the blog does concede that some small details might be off, these new renders likely give us a good idea of what to expect from the Pixel 2 once Google releases it this fall.

The phone is also shown in several different colors including black, silver, blue, and even red, though it's not known at this time exactly which colors Google has planned for the Pixel 2.

Here are a few of the renders posted on Tuesday morning:.

For more infomation >> Technology News : Pixel 2 leak: Google's 2017 flagship phone belongs in 2016 - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Diversity Debate Sparks At Google Headquarters - Duration: 1:46.

For more infomation >> Diversity Debate Sparks At Google Headquarters - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo on Women in Tech - Duration: 0:56.

For more infomation >> Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo on Women in Tech - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

Technology News : Google Pixel 2 - Latest leaks give us best view yet of upcoming Android phone - Duration: 3:18.

Google Pixel 2 - Latest leaks give us best view yet of upcoming Android phone

Google look set to unveil the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 later this year, with an October launch expected - mirroring last year's big Pixel reveal.

Leaks have already given a good idea of what features the new Pixel will bring, with both phones expected to drop the 3.

Google are rumoured to be preparing a minor upgrade of the Pixel 2, and a more significant revision of the Pixel XL 2.

And following on from the first real-life image of the Pixel 2 emerging last week, more leaked images have dropped yesterday.

The Pixel 2 has been the focus of most leaks, and that's no different from the most recent shots which appear to be of pre-production models.

The most recent leaked pictures give us a clearer look at the front of the upcoming Android phone. The images show the front-facing speaks and front-facing camera of the Pixel 2.

The backside of the image shows the top-third glass on the back of the screen has been changed to top-fifth glass. It no longer covers the fingerprint scanner either.

The images also shows a number of stickers with barcodes, that have been blurred out to protect the identity of the source of the pictures. The person who provided the images to GSMArena also said the Pixel 2 does not have a headphone jack.

This was also reported by renowned tipster Evan Blass. If Google do drop the headphone jack for the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2, it would mark a surprise design U-turn for the Mountain View firm.

Apple last year sparked outrage amongst a section of fans by dropping the 3. 5mm headphone jack in favour of wireless technology for the iPhone 7. The design move gave Apple more space inside the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7's Taptic Engine.

The Cupertino firm did include a dongle with the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7S that plugged into the lightning port and let users still use 3.5mm headphones.

The iPhone 8 is also expected to keep this design feature, however it did spark anger amongst some Apple fans who favour the ageing port.

Google, with their original Pixel, seemed to try to capitalise on this anger by highlighting how their phone kept the 3.5mm headphone jack.

The launch trailer for the Pixel highlighted how "new" the phone was and all the "new" features it brought with it.

It mentioned how the Pixel "doesn't have a version number - new" and how it was "built from scratch for VR - new".

GSMARENA Google Pixel 2 has been pictured in new leaked images.

GSMARENA The Google Pixel 2 and XL 2 is expected to drop the 3. And - in what could been seen as a cheeky dig at Apple - the trailer highlighted the "3.5mm headphone jack - satisfyingly not new".

The original Google Pixel was announced at an event last October and went on sale later that month. So Google Pixel 2 release date seems likely to happen again in October.

Sources have told 9To5Google that the Pixel 2 price is expected to rise by at least $50, which would translate in the UK to around a £50 increase.

And it's been rumoured that the Pixel 2 could be the first to feature the brand new Snapdragon 836 processor from Qualcomm.