If you are suffering from depression or anxiety it can feel like you are all alone
with no one to turn to for help.
Telling someone how you feel can be difficult and scary,
and talking to your parents can be especially hard
if you're worried how they'll react or if they believe what you are saying.
It can be difficult, but telling your parents how you feel is a very important step in recovering from your illness.
Your parents can show you the love and support you need to feel better
and help you get access to professional help, so finding the courage to tell them is always the right thing to do.
Before you start the conversation, try to work out exactly what you will say
and write it down on a piece of paper.
Think of specific examples of times you have felt sad or anxious,
or when your mood has affected your ability to do well in school or with other areas of life.
Having a good idea of what you are going to say will help you stay calm and get your point across
even if you get nervous.
You might be worried your parents will get angry or upset when you tell them about your illness.
You may even imagine the conversation going terrible and ending in an argument.
These predictions and expectations are all part of your illness because depression and
anxiety cause you to see the world in a negative way making you imagine the worst possible situations.
Try not to listen to your worries.
The truth is, your parents care about you and want you to be happy.
When you are ready to speak to your parents, make sure you pick a good time.
You want them to be in the right mood to listen.
If they are stressed out, too tired or sleepy, then wait until tomorrow.
You should get straight to the point and say, "I need to talk to you"
Explain that you have been feeling sad or anxious for a long time
and you are worried that there might be something wrong with you.
Try to give them as much information as possible.
Tell them what you have been feeling, and for how long.
Don't worry about explaining everything perfectly, or if you can't find the right words.
Your parents don't need to understand exactly what you are going through.
They just need to hear and know that you want help.
If you've been having suicidal thoughts or considered ending your life, you need to tell your parents.
If you think your parents won't understand what "depression" or "anxiety" are
then start by explaining that you feel very sad or anxious all the time
and you think it isn't normal.
To help them understand, you could show them descriptions of your illness from trusted
sources like the APA, NHS or whatever is available for the country you live in.
Try to help them understand that depression and anxiety
are more than just being in a bad mood or feeling down.
They are real illnesses caused by changes in the brain
that you can't fix simply by "getting over it".
Once you explain what you are going through, your parents will probably be very concerned
and will want to know what they can do to help.
Explain that just having their support will mean a lot to you, but you would also like
to go to a doctor and get professional help.
Your parents will probably believe what you are telling them and they'll want to help you,
but it's also possible they'll need some convincing.
They may try to tell you that you shouldn't be feeling these things.
That you're just a kid and you should stop over-reacting.
Your reply should be "I KNOW I shouldn't be feeling like this.
It isn't normal to be feeling this way all the time.
That's how I know I need help."
If they don't believe how you are feeling and see it as normal part of puberty,
try explaining that you feel sad or worried ALL THE TIME.
While your friends and other people your age have ups and downs, you only have downs.
Sometimes, it can take a while for what you are saying to really get through to your parents.
They really care about you but it's easier to think that you're just going through a bad phase
than to admit you need professional help.
Don't be discouraged.
Your feelings are important even if your parents don't understand them right away.
If starting a conversation is too difficult or if you can't find the right words to say,
writing a letter, email or message to your parents is a great way to get the conversation started.
If speaking to your parents is difficult, you could try talking to another adult
who could help you.
A school teacher, counselor, religious leader, youth worker or close adult could offer you valuable advice,
put you in touch with a doctor and even speak to your parents for you.
If you are really having trouble you could wait until your next regular doctor's visit
or when you're ill with a cold, and then talk to them about your depression or anxiety
while you are there.
Keep talking to your parents and try getting them to understand what you are experiencing.
Your feelings and well-being are important!
So don't give up until you make progress.
If you feel afraid or discouraged by what they say, try to focus on how much better
life will be when they finally understand and are able to help you.
Telling your parents about your mental health issues is always scary,
but in the end, it will be worth it.
We've put links to great resources for mental health in the description so please check that out.
We also have professional psychologists answering in the comments,
so please leave a comment if you have any questions at all
or if you have advice for other's who struggle with this issue.
If you liked this video, please click that like button below
and don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more helpful explainers.
Thank you for watching! :)
For more infomation >> How to tell your parents about your Depression and Anxiety - Duration: 5:46.-------------------------------------------
Saudi Arabia Vs. Coachella pt 2 | Everybody's Lying About Islam 6 [Rob & Ray React] - Duration: 19:32.
Everybody Jump!
[Electronic Music]
...in Saudi Arabia...
So you're saying, we are protecting the one country that is not only spreading the fundamental,
radical version of Islam, but also financing terrorism to a great degree... and we are
protecting, ignoring and pretty much letting them run roughshod over the area because of...
Because they are useful.
And why are they useful?
They are useful in a very old school sort of Imperialist way...
So you still don't think it's to access their resources...
Oh, of course, of course, but actually this gets back... so you had mentioned that like
Saudi Arabia had the... had the resources, had the...
The Resource! In the region that matters...
There's... but...
Can I ask you a question, can I ask both of you a question?
If there was no deposits of oil, under any country in the Middle East, do you even think
it would even rank and register on the global scale on which it does, for the number of
wars, number of conflicts, and the amount of time that we invest in this region of the
world?
Absolutely not. I think we'd just let them simply be in the desert doing whatever they
want, practicing whatever they want...
I think, I think a good comparison is any sort of Northern Africa, or these other regions
where you have
Resource rich regions...
Where you have a vast rural population, not as educated, large unemployment, conflicts
that are happening over territory
And then a diamond mine pops up...
...between tribes, just a resource poor nation that nobody wants to deal with. Is that the
analogue?
There's the concept of the "oil curse" and it's uh... if you look at some of the healthiest
countries in the Middle East, it's uh.. I would still include Turkey in that number,
and I think Jordan is... with very little in the way of resources... I mean they've
got the... they've got Petra, they've got the Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade place.
I still want to go there. But, so these countries that do not have significant oil resources
are in better shape than the rest of the Middle East.
I think that actually Oil, derailed Middle East development in very serious ways.
Yeah, because when they went from just another kid on the block to the most baddest kid on
the block, then you're saying, that's when they started to spread the radical ideology.
Exactly! And it's a very... it's a controversial thing to say, but I do think it's fair to
say that it is a kind of... OK I won't use the term Medieval... It's a pre-Modern context,
the way that Saudi Arabia governs itself. Because it is a, it's an absolute monarch,
with a relationship with a religious hierarchy, that is troubled and that's how they control
the country.
How much is it that the religious hierarchy controls that country?
Well that's, that goes back and forth. It depends on how powerful the king is. So the,
the first kind of modern Saudi Arabia, in the...I guess he... it was sort of a long
rise, they took Mecca and Medina I believe in the 1920's and he ended up having a very
long reign, didn't die until the early 1950's. He was powerful, he could pretty much dictate
to the religious hierarchy. But actually it was a very ISIS like group that helped him
come to power, and then they came into a dispute... I think over British subsidies, but don't
quote me on that, and he was able to crush them, because he was a more powerful Saudi
King.
It's a give and take...
So recently you're saying the religious component has been taking over the country.
The relationship between the Saudi family and the religious hierarchy actually goes
back almost 300 years.
So currently what is it at? Well currently it's the same give and take... in that the
Saudi kings, and there are elements of the Saudi royal family that are very interested
in modernization, further industrialization.. they're going to build innovation cities and
theme parks and yadda, yadda, yadda, but they can't go... they can never go too far. They
can never go to the point where they are ... where they are offending the religious hierarchy.
And the problem... especially since the late 1970s the kings have been in a weaker position,
because they have needed US power. They needed the Western... the evil Western infidel powers
to protect them from actors like Iran and Saudi Arabia. So they've already been in a
weaker position, and also the... the oil, since the beginning of the modern oil industry
in Saudi Arabia, in the 1930s there's been a ton of money coming in, but it's also involved
like Western engineers, and like subdivisions, like cloistered subdivisions of Westerners
living on holy Saudi land, so they have to spin a lot of money towards that religious
establishment.
So we've talked about how this came to be. And there's certainly, there's no doubt that
the relationship with Saudi Arabia was useful in the late 1970's against the Soviets in
Afghanistan, and everybody knows that story. And we've talked about how it's become dysfunctional
because of oil, and we've talked about where it's at and with the Saudis involvement in
9/11. So let's move forward now. Past today and let's say this. Let's say President Trump
did follow through with his promise to normalize relationships in the Middle East and go after
ISIS like we should...
So Let's say we de-emphasize the relationship with Saudi Arabia, and by virtue of that we
stop our support of what's going on in Yemen, and we pull out of Syria to an extent that,
I don't even know what to do there, but either way we get the hell out, then what happens?
What does that world look like, is that the right move? Like, is that what we should be
doing right now?
I would argue, I would argue it is, because especially from... would it be, short term
great for the region? Possibly not. Would it be long term great for the region? Absolutely.
Because less western involvement would be...
Who should control?
The actual countries there, the actual... throughout he history of the Middle East,
post-independence, like since the 1950s and 1960s, there have been very serious ideologies
and approaches towards development and what not, and they've all sort of gotten derailed
by the cold war and also by Saudi Arabia. Which I
So if it's not them, it's someone. It's never going to be just a complete even playing field
in this region of the world.
Of course not.
Who is going to take the lead. From what you're saying, and if I'm to believe everything that
you've put down in video and in writing, that Saudi Arabia is our puppet essentially, and
we're not going to spank them, we're not going to take away their money, we're not gonna...
We should.
Sure we should, we're not, we haven't, we're not doing that, and as a result you're saying
that that has helped spread fundamental terrorism through their extreme religious beliefs...
Who should run the show? Who should be getting the support?
Someone in that region has to take a
For, for...
I think it should be the same people who organized Coachella, because they did a hell of a job.
That's a good point. That's a good point.
Out in the desert, they know how to throw a party...
Open up a a dew lab right in the middle of it.
Yeah, dude! That'd be sick!
That is a good point.
Lady Gaga would break all their fucking feminist issues wide open.
There you are.
Fuck yeah dude.
Get a little nipple slip by Janet, those fucking guys would be going crazy.
I mean, who knows, could be that simple...
But there are clearly cultural differences between what goes on in here, and what goes
on in Saudi Arabia, and that's... they're a sovereign country, and that's like... we
might disagree, and we might think that their social order is backwards and their women's
rights are near the bottom in the world. While many of those things are and are probably
true, those reasons aren't necessarily enough for us to keep involved and try to shape who
they are as a country.
Yeah, I agree.
That's my opinion, just like I think State's should have rights in the US, over their own
decisions on social policy, I think sovereign countries should too, and that seems like
a no-brainer to me.
Well, Ray asked a very interesting question about who would be the power in the MIddle
East, and I think it'll be powers for... 500 to 1000 years depending on who you are talking
about, certainly since the 1500s...
Iran Israel?
Well... Not Israel! But...
Those two can't even fucking talk to each other! How are they going to run shit?
But it was Iran and Turkey. Iran and Turkey ran the Middle East for 500 ... I mean, Iran
has been present in some form some way for thousands of years. As Persia or what have
you, and the Turks have been very serious powers in the Middle East since about the
1510s... I do think that they would come back, and I think traditionally Egypt was sort of
the seat of Arab power, and Arab ideology and culture what have you. I would love for
more of that to come to the fore again. I mean Egypt currently is a big mess, but that...
I think Egypt, Iran, and Turkey would be the people who would control the region.
Ok What about Russia?
I was just going to say, because with each one of those countries there's a problem...
They have a large Muslim population, they've got borders on there, they, I haven't looked
into this, but my guess would be that they have issues with immigration now, and people
fleeing the Middle East. Particularly into Georgia, Chechnya etc. Do you think they have
enough of a vested interest to become a large regional player.
No. I absolutely don't. And that gets to something that I talk about a lot, I think that the
threat and power of Russia is dramatically over-sold. I think why they are going so hard
for Assad is because that was the sort of thing they liked. He was reliable... He let's
them use a naval base, He was one of what two or three countries that Russia can seriously
rely on in the world. But as far as taking a more serious control... It's....
They're not into nation building is what you're saying.
No. They don't have the.... You need a lot of resources to go in...
Because Vladimir needs his 20% off the top...
Their economics are tied to the same economics that... Saudi Arabia's economics are tied
to the same economics as the Russians.
As much as of you know... I think any problem in the world can be solved by more education,
but I think in this region of the world, I think the two problems at play here, most
likely won't get solved. One is religious rights, and religious freedom, and the other
is money, resources, oil money, basically the power associated with that resource.
You have two things here that started pretty much every war that's ever been waged in this
world. Religion, and power and money.
Yes, power and money, power and money.
Give me another example! Of course, they're the same things. We equate Basically they're
interchangeable at this point. So my point is, you're never going to solve, like I said,
with the like Iran and Israel... it's a religious... at base it's a religious problem. In the Middle
East this is a... Sunnis, Shi'ites, certain sects of Muslims, you're not going to tell
someone who believes something their entire life, for entire generations... no, no, no,
you can't believe that anymore, this is the same issue we have in this country with religious
issues, is that we think we can dictate to other people what they believe religiously,
in our laws. You can't do that, this is not going to be solved. By any one entity.
I would argue that religious conflict to a degree is a given, yes people are not going
to agree on certain things, but I really don't like the well it's been centuries of conflict
and millennia of yadda yadda and there's nothing we can do, because that's simply not true.
As far as the current
Sure there's something we could do...
The current like tempo of Sunni shia anger is something we have not seen in that region
for quite some time, well actually since the foundation of Saudi Arabia.
But it's these tensions always exist, like in Yugoslavia, you had these tensions, but
it's all about the politics, and the money and the power, of that moment. It's about
the politics of a given moment, that can make these things become bad.
But aren't politicians religious and represent religions when they run? I, mean...
What I'm saying is it's like, if the political control isn't invested in that sort of politics,
in religious politics, then things will be OK, like Yugoslavia fell apart in a horrible
ethno-religious thing in the 1990s, but for the 40 50 years before that, Serbs and Croats
were getting married. And I think in the MIddle East you have, it depends on the region, it
depends on the country, it's a tremendously diverse area, but the Sunni, Shia issue was
nothing compared to what it is today. If we hadn't gone into Iraq, Sunni and Shia would
not be killing each other... I think that is.. It's the politics.
I disagree dude. Saddam Hussein as a Sunni, and they were a minority in that country,
and they ruled with an Iron Fist over another section of that religion, Shi'ites. And the
Kurds, they were killing, it was bad, for a long time. So of course, as soon as he gets
de-throned, the Shi'ites are like, oh it's our time now, to lay down the fucking noise,
to lay down the rain. This isn't something that like... This is in every government and
institution, it is completely to the core of an individual what your religious beliefs
are... right now, in the middle east you have tons of conflicting religious dynamics. And
how is this...
But they wouldn't. I would contend, I don't want to minimize the conflicting religious
dynamics, that they simply would not be expressed on this level, with this violence, with this
anger... if it weren't for politics, if it weren't for Bush's invasion of Iraq, if it
weren't for Saudi Arabia, which puts a shit ton of money into enforcing and driving diversity
out of Islam. I think that is a very real problem. Islam...
What's their benefit? What's the benefit for the people of Saudi Arabia to spread this
fundamentalist extreme view of being a Muslim. I would say extremely limited, and they are
victims of this. The benefit is to the royal family. The Saudi royal family gets its legitimacy
by being the defenders of the faith, and by being the...
This extreme version of the faith.
Yes.
So who checks them on their version of the faith?
Well they check the religious establishment. So the religious establishment... This is
a deal that goes back, as I said, 250 to 300 years between... you've heard the term Wahabi?
It actually comes from a guy named Wahab. And the great, great, great grandfather of
the Saudi king.
I thought that was something you ate with Sushi?
No that's Wasabi...
Ooooh. Sorry.
That's a deal that they made, and in a tribal society, it was actually a very powerful deal
to make. And it was intermittently very effective. It was effective for about a 50 year period
in the 1700s to the 1800s, and then more developed countries like Egypt and Ottoman Turkey smacked
them around. And they spent 100 years in the wilderness. And then it was the British, and
the Americans that brought them back.
Once we discovered they had a super important resource.
I think, well, with the British, it predated that...
British Petroleum?
Ah, that's an important.... but actually it was actually Standard Oil of California that
tapped that first well in 1938.
Sons of bitches!
Y'know.
I'm fucking looking at you Standard Oil. Alright, so I think we've probably, I don't know if
the camera's about to run out, but anybody got any final...
Yeah, let me throw this out there. There's some news stories being thrown out about Saudi
Arabia maybe developing some alternative energy sources, and they're on board for the big
green win. Ray, any impact there, do you think it's a...
I do, I think you just mentioned 2014 as being a time period where you saw them lose some
of their power, I think that's not a coincidence, that as a country, not only the United States,
but Europe is ahead of us, by like 20 or 30 years, we're seeing a shift dramatically from
fossil fuels to renewable sources of fuel, trying to create a more stable, sustainable
society. There's no question that's going to help. If you take the influence of their
money and their power away from them? People are going to start caring much less about
their religious wars, and what they feel and what the relationships are with warring countries
around them. At the end of the day I fear that what's going to happen is we're just
going to leave. All the foreign interests are going to be like, oh no more oil? Good
luck. And they're going to take off, and they're going to be back in the wilderness, and fending
for themselves.
I would be OK with that.
See, I like to see all humanity move forward. I don't want to see anybody be put into that
situation. And if it's so important to us now to spend billions and billions of dollars
waging war and installing dictators and doing this, and wanting to protect their the women
in those countries, and giving them the ability to go to school to be educated and have rights,
and all of a sudden, when there's no more money, and no more ATM, we don't care anymore?
Well I think that, look at Latin America...
I think it's too late, we're vested, we have to continue to support and try to figure out...
The great thing about Latin America is... if you, if you picture Latin America in the
1980s, it was the Middle East but worse. Because you had, you had the exact same dynamic. In
that case it was great powers, it was the Soviet Union, the United States, competing
different you know competing dictators, we're going to support this guy, you're going to
support that guy yadda yadda, and now that's over. With the end of the war in Columbia,
I believe that the entire Western hemisphere is completely free of war, which is extraordinary
to a child of the 1980s
Well there's still a war on Drugs...
Oh yes...
The most fucking, the most pointless, bullshit war ever.
Sounds like a good talk for another video.
How about South America as a talk for another video, because I can't co-sign that statement,
but I'll let...
So, Rob, thanks for having us out, Ray...
Thank you guys...
Coachella 2018, see you there baby,
Be there or be square.
T-lab.
Indeed. Thank you for watching, please subscribe. I hope you'll watch the rest of this series.
This discussion, I think did a great job of illuminating some of these issues. And please,
give my essay "Everybody's Lying About Islam" a look. It's available now on the Amazon Kindle,
and I think it does a pretty good job of laying out these issues in a way that you won't get
anywhere else.
It does do that.
Thank you travis.
All right.
More Freedom Foundation. The Straight Dope.
Yes...
Michigan, Ray...
Go Blue!
There we go... I was waiting for that. Go Blue, Go Blue...
-------------------------------------------
Prince Harry Gets Candid About Future Fatherhood. - Duration: 1:15.
Prince Harry Gets Candid About Future Fatherhood.
'I, of course, would love to have kids' Prince Harry might be ready to start a royal
family of his own.
In a new podcast interview with The Telegraph, the prince spoke eagerly about becoming a
father.
"I've actually had a lot of practice for that," Harry said.
He explained that he's currently the godfather to five or six of his friend's children.
Plus, he's also uncle to Prince William's children, Prince George and Princess Charlotte.
He revealed that his key to developing those relationships is being able to "grow up but
also to stay in touch with your childhood side."
When asked about starting a family of his own, Harry was confident in his response:
"I, of course, would love to have kids," he said.
The royal's relationship with Suits star Meghan Markle is reportedly getting serious (with
proposal rumours already on the table), though it may be a while until we hear about new
additions to the royal family.
But when the time does come, Prince Harry seems fully prepared for daddy duty.
THANKS FOR WATCHING.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE MY CHANNEL.
-------------------------------------------
Lucid - Duration: 2:21.
In the depths of the mind,
Lay the wishes and hopes kept secret,
A life one lives only in the imprisonment of unconciousness
Release by thoughts, memories, concepts, and at last one is freed,
when they dream,
Lucidly
except apparently I just have a better imagination
than everyone else,
because I have never seen the appeal of lucid dreaming.
like... at all.
sure the world's an open canvas, every bottled up expression you have is released
but... can't you do that while you're awake?
I don't mean in reality!
because your dreams would be
squandered as fast as you can say them
but just close your eyes imagine a world
you want to live in.
think about the characters the cities the landscape the
fashion sense of nearby
sentient cybernetic ducks
and that one guy down the street that you don't like
being imprisoned.
By cybernetic duc-
The world is your oyster,
literally if you like
because as much as people may say it
the mind isn't at all constricted to the rules of reality.
We have a word for this by the way.
it's called being creative
What's more, because you're not asleep
you don't forget the dream every time
only a few moments before you're going
to tell someone about that awesome dream
you just had and now it's just really
awkward because you look like you're
gonna say something and now you're not
and all I remember about the dream is
there was at least one
sentient cybernetic duck
*clears throat*
if you're having trouble thinking of your own world to live in
because you're not creative
then steal someone else's
plagarism isn't illegal within the mind
favorite TV show?
BAM you're a character now favorite
favourite movie?
BAM there's a sequel!
Favourite Sci-Fi Western series canceled after
the first breathtaking season!?
Bam.
Burn down their headquarters.
it's easy to forget the power of the mind,
when so much beauty is outside of it...
but if you close your eyes,
even for a second
are there bugs in here?
is there something I'm forgetting?
the world's going to end one day and I might be on it
the probability of my existence is nearly infinitely small
my future is undetermined
it's entirely possible I will ruin everyone else's lives
in the process of one poor decision
I might go nowhere
nobody will know my name in a few years
my online presence and offline presence are both minuscule in comparison to -
*breaths in deeply*
You know what?
nevermind.
just distract yourself with like... video games or something.
*Duck quack*
-------------------------------------------
World Famous Psychologist Just Said One Simple Thing About President Trump And Made Libs Insane Vide - Duration: 3:11.
World Famous Psychologist Just Said One Simple Thing About President Trump And Made Libs
Insane (Video)
No, Donald J. Trump is not crazy.
He's "crazy like a fox" as indicated by incredibly famous psychiatrist Keith Ablow.
Donald Trump may do things another way than anybody has ever gotten things done, yet it's
not simply "off the cuff" as it might look.
Trump has a virtuoso personality, and all that he does is by the plan.
Commonly the CLM (Crooked Liberal Media) may think they are outgoing President Trump, however
as a general rule, they are doing precisely what he foresaw.
By what other means do you think a presidential competitor could burn through 1/2 as much
as his rival and win?
"WE'VE GOT A GENIUS IN THE OVAL OFFICE, AND IF WE THINK HE'S GOING TO SUBSCRIBE
ENTIRELY TO PROTOCOL AND BE FLAWLESS AND POLISHED, THINK AGAIN!"
DR.
KEITH ABLOW In the event that you agree with Dr. Ablow please SHARE this.
The liberal media is doing all that they can to bring our new president down.
We must get the TRUTH out via web-based networking media.
Partial transcript (Dr. Ablow's words):
You can not run a multinational corporation, enjoy the respect, and love of your children,
and your wife, and recruit to your administration, which by the way, you happen to be occupying,
because you defeated 16 Republican primary opponents, and the heir-apparent to the Democratic
administration, and then be called unbalanced.
He's quite balanced!
He's achieving things no one else has achieved.
That does not mean he's usual, he can be extraordinary, and he can have a very different
approach, but to call him crazy, would be well, craziness you know.
When I trained in medicine, part of my rotations were through surgery.
Some of the best surgeons had some quirks, right, an errant word, something yelled out
in the OR.
You know you'd want doing your surgery?
Those very guys!
They were not the polished ones, they were the geniuses man!
And, we've got a genius in the Oval Office, and if we think he's going to subscribe
entirely to protocol and be flawless and polished, think again!
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
Share the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for reading.
-------------------------------------------
North Korea US nuclear threat all about - Duration: 2:43.
For more infomation >> North Korea US nuclear threat all about - Duration: 2:43. -------------------------------------------
YKC Wadiyar speaking about MYSURU MEMES & MYSURU - Duration: 1:30.
I congratulate MYSURU MEMES on their 4th anniverasary
I think MYSURU is
one of the most dynamic cities in the
world in blends our history our heritage
very well with the modern 21st century
India and this blend of modernity in
history is reflected in I think MYSORE's
Most , foremost
Online page which is MYSURU MEMES
MYSORE has a lot of things which
one person would like about it for me
especially it's the pace at which one can live here
It can be very fast moving like
Like DASARA
most festive season, festive cities and
during a festive season and it's also
one of the most slow moving cities and can
be very relaxing when you needed to be
I think what I'd like to see in mysuru as a
young citizen is a continued effort of
citizens to commit to cleanliness and
also to commit to upholding our
collective heritage which all of us
share and not only me but all of us
together because all of our ancestors
who produced the golden era of MYSORE and
it's our duty to uphold it as far as
MYSURUMEMES is concerned I'd like them to
use it now very wide audience to further
very many good causes which can be done
and also see to it that the page is used
for the good and keeping within the
ideals with which every MYSURIANS lives
-------------------------------------------
Tanks - Cars FULL EPISODE ᴴᴰ About 1 hour ★★★ Best Funny Cartoon for kid ► SPECIAL COLLECTION 2017 - Duration: 59:16.
Tanks - Cars FULL EPISODE ᴴᴰ About 1 hour ★★★ Best Funny Cartoon for kid ► SPECIAL COLLECTION 2017
-------------------------------------------
Responding to Jesse Wellens: What Makes YouTube Great - Duration: 7:58.
Hello YouTube. It's Chase here
Today I wanted to do a video response to Jesse's newest video on PrankvsPrank.
Hi guys.
Sitting here in my car, in a parking lot over at Menchie's, the frozen yogurt chain, here in town.
Going there with some of my friends
They followed me here, but they're dropping someone off at their house who lives really close by.
So, they're going to be back here in a few minutes. But, I'm here just waiting for them. Chilling in my car.
I had planned to film parts of today's video at the college. I was going to have some people help me
But, I'm just going to be doing it on my own this weekend. I'll probably have to have some of them help me with future videos
But for this video, just gonna be a one man team again. So
Just waitin for my friends and then we'll get frozen yogurt.
Hello YouTube. It's Chase here. Today I wanted to do a video response to Jesse's newest video on PrankvsPrank.
I was one of the first people to watch his new video on YouTube as soon as it was uploaded.
I got the notification on my desktop and I immediately clicked on it.
And of course, he used a clickbait title called "Quitting YouTube."
Now, even before I clicked on the video, I knew that he probably wouldn't actually quit YouTube and there'd be some reason he uploaded this video.
So, I clicked on it. And, of course, after a few minutes of watching, he is pretty serious about wanting to quit YouTube
if his views on his channel don't improve.
So, I mean, you can go watch his video if you haven't watched it already.
But basically, he says that like the views on his channel are down, you know, and why spend so much time
making these great videos? He's such a talented creator. Why make these huge videos on YouTube when people who used to watch his videos aren't watching them?
because it's not being pushed out to people through YouTube.
That's what many large YouTubers have been saying lately. Is that, their videos are not getting viewed by their existing audience.
because of the changes in the YouTube algorithm.
I also feel like it's possible that these big YouTubers have lost touch with their fans. They've lost touch with how they actually became popular.
and, they need to, kind of, remember why they became famous on YouTube. Why people started watching them.
After two years of wanting to make videos on YouTube, I decided to invest in my passion for creating.
I've come to realize and understand that it doesn't matter how many people are watching my videos.
What matters is that I'm experiencing, I'm learning, and I'm always creating,
isn't that what YouTube's really about? Creating content that you're proud of in that very moment?
I've really come to love and appreciate Jesse's videos. I've been watching his channel for a long time.
I've been watching his channel longer than I've been watching any other channel on YouTube.
I wouldn't say that he inspired me through BFvsGF and PrankvsPrank, when those two channels were very popular.
I'm not saying that he inspired me to do YouTube, but he definitely gave me that final nudge
during the year that I started uploading videos
His editing style, his filmmaking style is so unique. It's so different. it's such a breath of fresh air.
If you watched like his Burning Man video, there's something so unique and so cool about them, especially now that he's kind of been losing
that Casey Neistat influence now that he stopped vlogging. He's been making these big production things in his goal to become a filmmaker.
And it's really great stuff. However, Jesse's complaining in his newest video about not getting very many views and potentially leaving YouTube shows that
he has forgotten the essence of what actually made YouTube great. It's about the product, not the views. There's so many videos that
we would call "trash content" get millions of views. And, I'm guilty of watching them. I love watching videos like that.
However, there's so many of them out there and quality videos are no longer being made. The essence of YouTube is making videos that you're proud of
Views shouldn't affect that. I'm not slamming Jesse. I still look up to him as a creator. I still think he's one of the greatest YouTubers.
I will follow him whether he stays on YouTube or not. I will always follow whatever he makes.
And I'm not saying that I have all of the answers. I'm not saying that I'm great at making YouTube videos. However, I'm driven to make better content.
Every time I make a video, I try to make it the best that I can in that particular moment.
Yeah, you'll hear me admit that it wasn't that good or I might've done this differently or that differently, but in the end
I made the best video that I could in that moment in time when I hit the upload button.
Trying to always make my best video yet is what keeps me going on YouTube. Not the views. Not the subscribers. And not the money.
I've spent more money on camera equipment for this channel than I'll ever get back from it.
And that's because I love what I do
I'm doing this because I want to be a good filmmaker. I want to make the best content that I can
So the number of views, the number of subscribers is great. I celebrate that when I reach these milestones.
it really makes my work feel recognized and appreciated and it does give me a boost to keep going
However, the main reason that I upload videos is to always make better content. I am continuously trying to improve the videos that I make
and I will not stop making videos until I am satisfied with where I'm at. I know where I want to be, but I don't know how to get there.
and the only way I can think of getting there is to continue making videos and continue practicing what I'm doing.
So, putting your YouTube career in the balance because you're not getting enough views and claiming that you want YouTube to be great again
it just doesn't add up. Views is not what made YouTube great.
It's the creators who put their soul into their work and don't expect anything in return.
Thanks for watching. I hope you all have a fantastic day or night, whenever you are watching this
As always, continue to follow your dreams and don't let anyone stop you
As always, I'm Chase Charaba and I'm exploring life through moving pictures.
-------------------------------------------
All About Mee - Duration: 6:26.
hey guys this is Tommy Weir um guess
what mine my new YouTube channel my
first video hey um so hey what y'all
doing huh
I just got home from a track meet I
don't run track but I was watching my
friend she did live honey
so um from my first video I decided to
UM just do a little all about me all
about me pinky so um yeah so um a little
bit about myself um my name is Tommy
hmm um I live in Iowa we love corn and
potatoes and um I'm so to be a freshman
oh let's go and um yeah like to say I
like to add a little bit and um I like
to hang out with my friends
yeah I'm talking to you Lea home and um
and my best friend
Makayla I'm talking to you
so um yeah a little bit about me oh I
have one brother and one sister
uh yeah my grandma my grandma my cousins
that's what I have a motorcycle room oh
yeah oh yeah and a little bit about me I
like to get distracted shorted extracted
I get very distracted yeah I like to get
distracted likes work but oh no yeah I'm
I like to listen to music I love music
oh and things I hate I hate I hate
things yeah I do a very gleeful person
but I hate things too
this is right here this this right here
this I ate sit sit sit
you ate
huh so yeah something I hate the most
and I hate it when my brother is so
annoying but he can be like you gone
devil Satan sometimes I think on Satan
like tonight in this double chin a hint
uh-huh sure see I don't like that things
I love like a natural lighting and
that's my fault that's right here mmhmm
yeah why screw sucks sucks I'd like to
let you know I am Christian yep
Christian I believe in God Jesus Christ
I marry my the Father Son Holy Spirit
yeah so yeah I like to be goofily hit
together
why is the sky blue so yeah another
thing I love is I love my phone and I
love YouTube and another love is my best
friend
Mikayla yeah I love you I love you
shoutout to Mikayla well yeah and um I
love to take pictures too um yeah um I
may get a bit too oh yeah
oh and I love youtuber Liza shoutout to
you I like my friends at school I like
reading so much and I love Grey's
Anatomy yeah let's go yeah it's really
weird how I get so distracted oh yeah so
like it's weird how I get so distracted
like I don't know like I just like stare
at something over wall and yeah and I'd
love to smile so yeah
about me meow another thing I love is I
love to make characters and like I can
make like
of all like and Ashley like a shout-out
to my friend Taylor um another shout-out
again a longshot tonight my friend Lea
so yeah this is my video I guess
it's done yeah my first be pretty boring
I know for watching thanks for clicking
on it at least um if you cringed thank
you because this is crunch vest if you
didn't know front row seat yep
so um yeah leave a comment like it leave
any negative comments I swear I won't
leave punchy yeah pick that thumbs down
button I'll live with it but no negative
comments so
you
-------------------------------------------
What is THAAD Everything you need to know about the US anti missile system - Duration: 4:34.
For more infomation >> What is THAAD Everything you need to know about the US anti missile system - Duration: 4:34. -------------------------------------------
日本の好きなところ ベスト10 THINGS I LOVE ABOUT JAPAN (#5-1) - Duration: 10:43.
I'll make English subs on May 1! Thx for your patience ^^
-------------------------------------------
Five Facts About Wolves - Wolf Facts, For Kids - Duration: 1:00.
Hey, everyone!
Here are five fun facts about wolves!
Wolves are the largest of the dog family.
Wolves function in packs of six to 10, living and hunting together.
The wolf pack is led by the alpha male and female.
They are the only wolves in the pack that breed.
Wolves are carnivores.
Their meal of choice are deers, elk and other hoofed mammals.
Wolves are famous for their howls.
This can be used to unite pack members who are separated.
-------------------------------------------
Much a do about nothing (eng. subs) - Don John (Honest Villain scene) - Keanu Reeves - Duration: 1:07.
What the good-year, my lord.
Why are you thus out of measure sad?
There is no measure in the occasion that breeds.
Therefore the sadness is without limit.
You should hear reason.
And when I have heard it...
...what blessing brings it?
I cannot hide what I am.
I must be sad when I have cause and smile at no man's jests...
...eat when I have stomach...
...and wait for no man's leisure...
...sleep when I am drowsy...
...and tend on no man's business...
...laugh...
...when I am merry...
...and claw no man in his humor.
If I had my mouth...
...I would bite.
If I had my liberty...
...I would do my liking.
In the meantime...
...let me be that I am and seek not to alter me.
-------------------------------------------
Is English a Tonal Language? - Duration: 9:29.
Many of you have probably heard of the phenomenon of "tonal languages," languages where
you need to say things with just the right tone, otherwise you'll wind up saying something
completely different.
The most famous tonal language is Chinese, but this category also includes plenty of
other languages, especially in southeast asia and Africa.
In these languages controlling the pitch of your voice while your saying something is
just as important as getting the consonants and vowels right.
For instance in Chinese, ma means horse while ma means mother.
Compare that to English, where "horse" "horse" "horse" "horse," all of
these just mean "horse."
So there you go.
If a language uses pitch it's tonal, if it doesn't then it's not.
Super simple.
Until you start to think about it, for even, like, a couple of minutes, at which point
everything breaks.
Because here's the thing: tone might not change the meaning of this particular word,
but we do use tone to communicate meaning.
In fact, I can think of at least three different ways to communicate different things in English
using tone.
Firstly, you can use pitch to emphasize certain words.
"HE didn't steal the money," "he didn't STEAL the money," and "he didn't steal
the MONEY" these three sentences communicate completely different ideas, and the only difference
between them is the tone I said them in.
Secondly, you can use tone to signify questions.
Compare "You stole the book?" to "You stole the book."
The first might not technically be a question, but at the very least it does make it sound
like I'm expecting an answer, whereas the second doesn't.
Lastly, it seems like differences in tone is the main way we figure out which syllable
the stress of a word falls on, and we use stress to distinguish between different words.
Permit is a noun, while permit is a verb, and you can actually experimentally show that
the main way we tell the difference is by looking at which syllable has the higher pitch.
Situations like this are rare in English, but there are more, like incline vs incline
or intern vs intern.
If you're anything like me, you might easily look at all this and get the impression that
English is actually a tonal language.
Or at least that this whole thing is a lot more complicated than people generally let
on.
Well, I'm hear to tell you that it's the second one, but people don't usually go
into the details because it gets really confusing and difficult to talk about really quickly.
So, on that note, let's dive in!
Buckle up everyone because we're about to get technical.
Let's start by defining some terms, because I've been using the word "tone" kind
of sloppily this whole video.
On a piano, which key you press determines the pitch of the sound, while how hard you
push it controls the volume.
Pitch is basically the frequency of the sound wave, while volume is the amplitude.
Now, you might notice you can play a note on a piano and then play the same note at
the same volume on a violin, but they'll still sound different.
This is because of timbre, which for are purposes is basically the texture of the sound.
Pause the screen now if you want to get into the physics of it, but for the rest of you
we can just move on.
Now, almost all of the time in language it's the timbre of the sound that's communicating
information, which is why you can take an audio recording and raise the pitch or lower
the pitch or make it louder or quieter and most of the time it'll mean exactly the
same thing as before.
But as we noted earlier with these three things, pitch also sometimes communicates information.
So, if your definition of a tonal language is just "a language that incorporates pitch
somehow," then, yes, English would be a tonal language, along with probably every
language ever.
But usually when linguists say that a language is tonal, they mean that it uses pitch to
communicate lexical information.
All that means is that pitch is used to distinguish one word from another.
"Pink and FLUFFY" might mean something different from "PINK and fluffy?", but
those differences are post-lexical: above the level of the word.
The pitch changes things like which word is more important and whether the phrase as a
whole is a question or not, it doesn't change what words there are or what order they're
in.
Which lets us deal with these two, but there's still a case to be made that English is tonal
because of "accent."
What I mean by accent is that within a word some syllables feel more prominent or important
than others.
In "permit" the accent is on the first syllable, while in "permit" it's on
the second one.
It looks a lot like the main way we tell which syllable has the accent is the fact that the
accented syllable has a higher pitch, so English uses pitch to distinguish between words, so
that must make it tonal.
However, there are two huge differences between what English does and what true tonal languages
do.
The first is that pitch isn't always the main way we tell where the accent is in a
word.
Thing is, in English, when a word is the focus of a whole sentence, we usually give the accented
syllable of that word higher pitch, and when we say "permit" and "permit" all on
their own like that we're kind of saying them as if they're making up a whole sentence
all on their own, so of course they're going to have the focus, so of course we're going
to make the accented syllable higher pitched.
But listen to the way I say them in context when they don't have the sentence's focus:
"I didn't permit that."
"I didn't give him the permit" And if we cut those words out of the surrounding
recording and play them back… "permit" "permit"
Suddenly it doesn't sound like pitch is the main thing we're using to tell them
apart.
In this context you can show that it's actually the relative length of the two syllables,
or which of them you spend more time pronouncing, that's doing most of the work of getting
across which syllable has the accent.
That length difference is there whether or not that word has the focus of the sentence,
which makes it seem like it's actually the main signifier of stress and not pitch.
The second reason English accent doesn't count as tone is that English accent is syntagmatic
rather than paradigmatic.
I told you we were gonna get technical.
Alright, let me try to explain.
If English really had tones then it would be natural to ask "ok, how many tones does
it have?" and the answer would seem to be two, one for when a syllable is accented and
one for when it's unaccented.
But that would imply that a two syllable word could have one of four different tone patterns:
one where the first one's accented, one where the second one's accented, one where
both are and one where neither are.
But that's not allowed: each word needs to have exactly one accented syllable: no
more, no less.
Permit and permit are both valid words, but PER-MIT and permit aren't.
This makes it look like English accent isn't really an innate quality of the syllable,
but rather, which syllable is accented is a property of the word.
If the accented-ness of each syllable varied independently then we could call English accent
paradigmatic, but the fact that they can't and that each word has exactly one accent
means that it's syntagmatic.
With this in mind we can say that a tonal language is a language that makes paradigmatic
lexical distinctions based primarily on pitch and English pretty clearly fails that definition.
In fact, there are cases of languages that are even closer to being tonal but still don't
meet this bar.
Japanese has syntagmatic accent like English, but unlike in English this accent is primarily
distinguished using pitch.
Languages like these are called pitch-accent languages, because, well, they mark accents
with pitch.
So, I hope that clears up why English isn't tonal, but for me at least, all of this kind
of raised more questions than it answered.
Like, if English uses pitch to communicate post-lexical information, like which word
is most important or whether the sentence is a question, then can tonal languages not
do that?
Like, if Chinese is already using pitch so much to distinguish between different words,
it sounds like they wouldn't be able to use pitch to emphasize words or mark questions
like English speakers do.
But that's not actually true.
It works differently than in English, but Chinese uses pitch to communicate both lexical
and post-lexical information.
One way that linguists used to think about this was basically in terms of adding functions.
You start with a function for the overall pitch of the whole sentence, which communicates
post-lexical information, and then you get another function that describes the tone of
each word, and then you just add the two functions together to get the way the pitch will vary
over the course of the sentence.
This is called the overlay model, because you're sort of overlaying different things
that affect the pitch, and it's pretty similar to the way a lot of people subjectively experience
how pitch works in tonal languages.
I think it's also a good way to introduce someone to the idea that in tonal languages
you can use pitch both to distinguish between words and to communicate all the stuff the
rest of it use it for.
Only problem is, it's kinda wrong.
Thing is, if you actually use the overlay model to make predictions about how the pitch
of someone's voice will change over the course of a sentence, and then you go out
and test it, the results aren't great.
It took linguists a long time to figure that out, in large part because it hasn't been
very long since the equipment necessary to measure this kind of thing objectively was
invented.
But once it was invented it wasn't long before there were a lot of tech companies
who wanted to make computers that could communicate with humans with normal spoken language, and
these tech companies suddenly got extremely interested in getting this kind of thing right,
so all of a sudden there was both the means and the pressure to do some actual science
to this area of linguistics, and the main result of that was the Auto-segmental Metrical
Theory.
Whereas the overlay model makes it sound like the speech centers of our brains are generating
two or more functions and then adding them together to produce the pitch we want to make,
the AM theory says that it's much more useful to think of a chunk of speech as containing
a linear string of tonal events.
Each language will have a limited number of possible tone events, rules for how tone events
are actually realized in the pitch of someone's voice and rules for which tone events happen
when depending on what words we're saying, the syntactic structure that they're in
and whatever post-lexical information we want to communicate.
These rules might be very complicated and they're going to be different in different
languages, but this basic model has proven to be very useful for modeling how different
languages deal with pitch differently.
For instance, with Mandarin Chinese some words in a sentence will be more important than
others, and a lot of the time this is marked by an exaggeration of the tone it would have
otherwise.
Low tones get lower and high tones get higher.
This can be described within the AM framework reasonably easily, you can just say that the
string of tone events is different depending on what lexical tones there are and also depending
on which word has the focus, and that when the tone events mark a word as having the
focus it winds up getting realized as an exaggerated form of the normal tone.
I'm not entirely sure how one would explain this with an overlay model.
There's a lot more I could get into.
Each language has its own unique system for combining lexical and post-lexical information
to create variations in pitch and volume and timing, but I hope that now the idea of tonal
languages at least makes a bit more sense to you.
See you soon for more linguistics videos!
-------------------------------------------
Everything You Need to Know About These Upcoming Sequels - Duration: 5:24.
Hollywood loves its sequels.
We're constantly bombarded with trailers, posters, and concept art for franchise films.
But there are quite a few Part-Twos in the works that have successfully stayed relatively
under the radar.
From Biblical epics to nineties nostalgia-fests, let's take a look at some of the sequels you
didn't know were being made.
Edge of Tomorrow 2
The Groundhog Day of alien invasion movies, 2014's Edge of Tomorrow is one of the best
sci-fi films in recent memory.
Starring Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt, this Doug Liman flick focuses on a cowardly major
who finds himself reliving the same day over and over.
Unfortunately, that day involves an army of extraterrestrials dead set on conquering Earth.
While the film earned rave reviews ...
"Have you ever felt this way before?"
… it was a major financial disappointment, so it didn't seem like the Edge of Tomorrow
story would live to see another day.
But according to original screenwriter Christopher McQuarrie, Cruise started pitching a sequel
while filming Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation.
Soon, the screenplay took shape and Blunt and Liman were on-board for part two.
Sadly, Bill Paxton was also set to return as the mustachioed Master Sergeant, but the
beloved actor passed away in February 2017.
Liman says the film will be a "sequel that's a prequel," that is "going to revolutionize
how people make sequels."
Whatever that all means, it sounds like it won't just be deja vu, all over again.
The Resurrection
With the success of Hacksaw Ridge, Mel Gibson is enjoying something of a comeback.
And his next big project is a throwback to his most successful film: 2004's The Passion
of the Christ.
Passion focused on the last hours of Jesus Christ's life as he endured torture after
torture before his death on a cross.
Despite the unusually gory take on the well-known tale, Passion became the highest-grossing
R-rated film in U.S. history.
In August 2016, Gibson announced he was working on a sequel, a "huge undertaking" called The
Resurrection, with Braveheart scribe Randall Wallace writing the screenplay.
In November, Gibson went on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and took a few questions
about the follow-up that he says is "likely still three years out."
"No, no bad guys?"
"Well, there are."
"Yeah?"
"They're in another realm."
"Oh."
As Colbert notes, the bible does suggest Jesus spent three days in hell, so it sounds like
Gibson might have the Messiah tangling with some literal demons.
2020 can't get here fast enough.
The Equalizer 2
In 40 years of acting on the silver screen Denzel Washington has never starred in a sequel.
But that's all about to change, as Washington is set to revive Robert McCall, the literature-loving
hit man from 2014's The Equalizer.
Officially announced in April 2015, The Equalizer 2 is getting the band back together.
Washington, director Antoine Fuqua, and screenwriter Richard Wenk are all back in action.
So why is Washington finally agreeing to a sequel?
Producer Todd Black says the Jason Bourne series inspired Denzel to finally take the
franchise plunge.
And he's not the only one on the project taking big risks.
Black says Fuqua has a new "effect" planned, which he can't talk about, but it's "frickin'
so cool you won't believe it."
Not even a hint, Dr. Evil?
"Throw me a frickin' bone here!"
Guess we'll have to wait, but it sounds "frickin'" amazing.
Look for The Equalizer 2 in 2018.
The Girl in the Spider's Web
David Fincher's 2011 adaptation of the Stieg Larsson novel The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
didn't earn enough to impress studio executives, so the next book in the series, The Girl Who
Played with Fire, never made it to the screen in the U.S.
However, in November 2015, it was announced that everybody's favorite hacker Lisbeth Salander
would finally return — only this time, Hollywood would adapt The Girl in the Spider's Web,
the latest novel in the Millennium series, written by David Lagercrantz after Larsson's
untimely death.
A year later, it was revealed that Spider's Web will be helmed by Fede Alvarez, the director
behind Don't Breathe and the 2013 Evil Dead reboot.
The studio also plans on recasting the lead role, and rumor has it the producers are considering
Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson, among others.
Spider's Web is scheduled to hit theaters October 2018.
The Rocketeers
Released in 1991 between Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves and Terminator 2: Judgment Day,
the two highest-grossing movies of the year, The Rocketeer crashed and burned at the box
office.
killing Disney's hope of establishing an Indiana Jones-style franchise.
But over the years, this World War II-era adventure has picked up something of a cult
following, inspiring the studio to finally revisit The Rocketeer universe.
In July 2016, Disney finally announced The Rocketeers, a follow-up taking place about
six years after the events of the original film.
Our new Rocketeer — yet to be cast — is an African-American female pilot who finds
herself in the middle of some serious Cold War intrigue with an evil rocket scientist
trying to get his hands on the all-powerful jetpack.
Interestingly, the film is being co-produced by NBA star Blake Griffin, who must have a
thing for rocket packs, considering he sported one in that Gamefly spot …
"Do you guys have a bathroom?
Thank you!"
Hopefully he'll have a cameo.
Thanks for watching!
Click the Looper icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Plus check out all this other cool stuff we know you'll love, too!
-------------------------------------------
Michelle Obama Went NUTS After Melania's Announcement About First Family's VACATIONS, You'll Cheer - Duration: 2:44.
Michelle Obama Went NUTS After Melania's Announcement About First Family's VACATIONS,
You'll Cheer
Americans are now seeing the HUGE contrast between Michelle Obama and Melania Trump.
It's not just about style but rather about family care and class.
Melania is a genuine Christian.
At the point when Melania Trump refered to the Lord's Prayer at the opening of a Trump
rally in Florida, religion will be front and first in the White House.
Melania has additionally chosen not to WASTE citizens with any overindulging and pampered
stream setting get-aways like the previous First Lady Obama did.
While the Trump's are in the White House and the First Family, they will fund THEIR
own vacations.
People, did you read that?
Let me says it once more… the Trump family will fund THEIR own vacations.
We as a whole know how Michelle is presently notable by Americans as the 'Vacationer-in-Chief.'
Melania has promised to keep her own staff to a base, and will just contract the same
number of staff members as are significant to her occupation as First Lady.
THIS IS JUST AMAZING, TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE!
"I think that Melania's going to be outstanding," President Trump said of his wife.
How about we include that President Trump's taking just $1/year rather than a $400,000/year
salary.
The First Family will likewise finance their very own vacations.
That is as of now a HUGE measure of dollars and funds for the persevering, taxpaying Americans
and that is simply looking at Trump's pay and travel.
The Trump First Family is specifically controlling waste and spending which is a little begin
towards paying off the robust shortage that Obama left – near a $20 TRILLION debt for
America.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
Share the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for reading.
-------------------------------------------
Tom Gold Run #108 TALKING TOM AND FRIENDS - cartoons about lions educational games for kids - Duration: 10:38.
For more infomation >> Tom Gold Run #108 TALKING TOM AND FRIENDS - cartoons about lions educational games for kids - Duration: 10:38. -------------------------------------------
Top 10 SECRET WAYS Companies Are RIPPING YOU OFF! - Duration: 9:05.
Hey YouTube, Jim here … welcome to Top10Archive!
It's all about the money.
For you, the consumer, it's all about saving as much as you can on every purchase.
For the company you're handing your hard earned cash over to, it's all about emptying
your wallet, so why should you trust there aren't underlying and hidden truths that
make them more money?
You shouldn't, and after this Archive of the Top 10 Secret Ways Companies Are Ripping
You Off, you'll never look at your favorite companies the same way again.
10.
Wasting Electricity Unless you unplug your cable box at night,
there's a good chance your cable company is draining you while you sleep.
Though they're not directly profiting from your loss, according to former United States
Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, the "always on" set-top boxes needlessly consume approximately
$12 billion of electricity every year, a figure contested by National Cable & Telecommunications
Association vice president Brian Dietz.
In 2014, for a California household, the estimation was about $8 a month, and while that may not
sound like much, a penny saved is a penny that can buy you a few lattes.
9.
Paying for Air It's funny to hear people complaining about
the air in their potato chip bags when there's a far worse offender out there.
You know that gallon of ice cream you've been nursing?
Would you believe that a rather large portion of that creamy goodness is actually what's
called "overrun," or air added to the product to achieve maximum creaminess?
Ice cream requires some air to be creamy and light, but just how much of your dairy treat
is air?
Well, the Food and Drug Administration regulates the amount of overrun a manufacturer can use
in their ice cream to 100%, which would allow them to package two gallons of ice cream from
one gallon of mix.
While name-brands allegedly stray from higher overrun, it's the cheaper store brands that
are said to hover close to 100%, allowing them the chance to offer much lower pricing.
8.
Hidden and Unnecessary Charges When you sign up for something, are you confident
that you know exactly what you're getting into?
Hidden fees are a common business practice, one that's pretty difficult to get away
from.
Cell phone companies are one of the worst proponents with what's been called "Cramming."
Essentially, third-party companies approved by the company tack on additional costs to
customer bills, which is why it's imperative to check your bill each month and the terms
of any contract you sign.
Cable companies are just as guilty of unnecessary charges.
How many channels in your 140-channel lineup do you actually watch?
Even if it's only half, you're stuck paying for channels you don't watch as cable companies
are not often inclined to offer an "a la carte" menu.
A third offender is banks who aren't always upfront about overdraft charges and increase
in ATM surcharges.
7.
Brand Name vs. Generic They're plastered all over our televisions
and scattered throughout the magazines some of us still read.
It's impossible to avoid name brand marketing, which conditions us to look for that specific
brand as we shop, but do we really need that specific brand?
In most cases, absolutely not.
Generic versions of many name brand products, from cereals to medication, offer a cheaper
variety without a decrease in quality or effectiveness.
In fact, if you compare the ingredients of many name brand and generic products, you'll
find very few – if any – differences.
In regards to generic drugs, the biggest difference will be in the inactive ingredients, or the
dyes and flavorings that alter color and taste.
The point?
You can easily save if you don't let name brand marketing get the best of you.
6.
Thicker Glasses Unless you're extremely anal and untrusting,
you likely haven't required a bartender to measure out your 16 oz pint in front of
you.
You just take their word for it, but after hearing this, you may think otherwise.
When you order a pint at a restaurant or bar, the likelihood that you're getting a full
16 oz is pretty slim.
One method to avoid giving you what you paid for, many locations turn to thicker 14-ounce
glasses, or "cheater pints."
It may look like a pint but the thicker glass takes up about 2 oz of space where your beer
should be.
In 2007, beer blogger Jeff Alworth started the Honest Pint Project to praise establishments
for giving an exact 16 oz. 5.
Sell-by / Use by Dates You wake up on March 3rd, craving a nice cold
glass of milk.
Low and behold, you grab the milk and are faced with a March 1st expiration date.
Clearly, it's time to get rid of the remaining half gallon and go buy another, right?
Sure, if you hate money.
Truth of the matter is those dates aren't even for you as the consumer, not that they'd
tell you.
The "Sell-by" date is meant for grocer management while the "Use by" date is
just the last day the food manufacturer will guarantee the freshness and quality of their
product.
More often than not, the food is still good days, sometimes weeks, after those dates.
If you're ever concerned about your foods freshness, don't go by the date.
Signs like rotten smells, slimy coatings, and change in consistency are better indicators
of when it's time to go shopping again.
4.
Convenience Shopping We're all about the convenient things in
life.
You walk through a grocery store, see a package of pre-chopped pineapple, and you buy it.
Find that same pineapple in its solid form, all you can think about is having to cut it
down and the urge for pineapple passes.
While convenient, pre-chopped food also comes at a cost – more money from your pocket.
The average difference between, say, a whole pineapple and a prepared package is around
$3.
Consider that it takes approximately 5 minutes to chop a head of lettuce, the grocer is essentially
getting $36 an hour to chop your fruit and vegetables, even more considering what they
deliver is likely not a full pineapple.
Chances are, if there's a more convenient form of something, you're paying more for
it.
A lot more.
Another example would be at Wal-Mart, where you can buy a warm 2-liter of soda for $1
in the back of the store, and a cold 20oz soda for nearly $2.
3.
Plumping When you buy $8 worth of chicken breast, you
want $8 worth of edible poultry.
You can bet, unless you go directly to the source, you're not getting that.
It's common practice for chicken producers to inject your packaged chicken with liquid
and, if the wording on the package is any indication, most aren't ashamed to show
it.
Your poultry could be injected with enough liquid to account for 15 to 30% of the weight
you're paying for and seeing as how that liquid will evaporate, you're essentially
throwing money to the wind.
The practice has been labeled as "plumping" and is usually done with salt water, chicken
broth, or seaweed extract.
In the Chinese market, shrimp gets the plumping treatment with a gel-like substance.
2.
Pre-Sale Price Hike When it comes to shopping, it's all about
the sale.
Black Friday, Cyber Monday, President's Day – you name it, there's a sale for
it, but what if we told you those price drops you're anxiously awaiting aren't really
anything special?
Back in 2013, department stores like JCPenney and Kohl's were found engaging in a rather
uncouth practice of raising the prices of products before putting them on sale.
Independent investigations into the matter performed by multiple newsgroups found that
many of the "sale" price tags were hiding a gross secret: underneath the sale sticker
was the progression of pricing that showed the item started out at a lower price than
what it was on sale for.
While some increases may have been the result of a rising cost of materials, most are likely
a ploy to place an item "on sale" without the same loss.
1.
Prepayment Penalties Are you in a mortgage with a high-interest
rate?
Did you find another company that will offer you a lower rate?
Sure, you can refinance, but don't expect the process to be as simple as that.
You see, if you try to pay off your debt with your current mortgage company early, you may
incur a "prepayment penalty," or a penalty for paying off your loan early.
They're not present on every mortgage, but the typical penalty can be as much as 80%
on six months of interest as homeowners are typically allowed to pay off up to 20% of
the loan balance each year.
The point of the penalty is for the lender to recoup a portion of the interest they're
losing with the loan being extinguished earlier than anticipated.
-------------------------------------------
6 Things You Should Know About Spirit Guides - Duration: 5:42.
6 Things You Should
Know About Spirit Guides
by Missy Marston
If you�re thinking about getting to know your spirit guides, or simply want to know
more about them, check out these need-to-know facts!
1.
You Have More Than One!
Most people have about four primary guides, who stay with you from birth, and around seven
guides that come and go as they�re needed.
2.
Some Stick Around, Others Come and Go
Throughout your soul development, some guides will swing by to help lead you through tough
life lessons and dark times.
When they are finished, they will move on to others who need them as well.
Think of them as a friend who seems to always be there when you need them, but you barely
talk in between.
It doesn�t hurt your friendship when they�re not around, but you know they will be there
for you in your time of need.
Other guides are there to watch over you as you grow, both physically and spiritually.
They are lifetime, protector guides, and are often the first ones you will meet.
3.
They�re Always There
If you ever feel alone or in need of guidance, always know your guides are there for you,
all you need to do is ask!
Just as your soul family sends you love and light, so do your spirit guides.
4.
They Aren�t Specific About the Future
First off, your future is always changing based on the decisions you make.
Secondly, your guides want you to fully experience life � its faults and celebrations.
Telling you what the future has in store won�t only ruin the surprise; it may change your
future.
For these reasons, your guides will usually give you teasers or hints about future events,
but will never reveal them.
And take those hints with a grain of salt!
Everything is constantly in motion, and your future can always be affected not only by
your decisions, but by others decisions as well!
5.
Spirit Guides Can Be Anything and Anyone
Spirit guides come in many sizes, shapes, and forms.
They even be your passed relatives and friends (my little sister is one of my guides), although
this is very atypical due to the fact that guides have to be unbiased and neutral, which
is hard for family members and friends.
Spirit guides can be half man half animal, they can be faeries, animals, plants, pure
energy, or simply human.
So don�t be too surprised if your guide looks way different than you!
6.
They Have Feelings, too!
Spirit guides genuinely love and care for you.
They will give you tough love when you need it and are always available to offer you help.
Many guides have past life connections to those they guide and want to give you help
and guidance as you may have done for them.
They feel proud, happy, sad, and really care about your well being.
They also have their own unique personalities!
Don�t forget that many of your guides were once human and living the human experience.
You picked out your guides before you were incarnated, and therefore have a personal
connection with them.
This is why guides are often the first spirits to come through; they are the easiest to connect
with because, in a way, they are a part of you and
your soul.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét