Youtube daily have Nov 4 2018

On the November 3 episode of JTBC's "Carefree Travelers 2," HaHa joined g.o.d's Park Joon Hyung, Sung Hoon, Kwak Yoon Ki, Go Eun Sung, and Yoo Seon Ho on a trip to Rome.

At one point during the show, HaHa and Park Joon Hyung talked about children over dinner.

Park Joon Hyung has a 16-month-old daughter, while HaHa has two sons who are two and six years old respectively

Park Joon Hyung shared that he was already worrying about his daughter's future boyfriend.

HaHa responded with envy, saying, "I want to have a daughter, too, but I can't have one because I'd feel sorry to my wife

Because I know how hard it is [to give birth to a child and raise her]."

"Carefree Travelers" is a travel variety show in which celebrities travel around the world through package tours with other participating tourists

The second season, which premiered on October 27, features Park Joon Hyung, SECHSKIES's Eun Ji Won, Sung Hoon, and Yoo Seon Ho as fixed cast members.

For more infomation >> Haha Mong Muốn Có Một Đứa Con Gái (Haha Want To Have A Daughter ) - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

Kris, let me see what you have! (Delta Rune) - Duration: 0:04.

For more infomation >> Kris, let me see what you have! (Delta Rune) - Duration: 0:04.

-------------------------------------------

Top 5 app useful not have on play store 2018 - Duration: 6:10.

For more infomation >> Top 5 app useful not have on play store 2018 - Duration: 6:10.

-------------------------------------------

Rihanna & Hassan Jameel Have Split Again: Do Either Chris Brown Or Drake Have A Chance Now? - Daily - Duration: 3:04.

On and off-again couple Rihanna and Hassan Jameel are definitely OFF right now, HL can EXCLUSIVELY tell you! Find out if she's willing to rekindle her romance with the Saudi billionaire, or with an older ex-lover

   There's a reason why Rihanna, 30, hasn't been seen with Hassan Jameel since July

A source close to the Anti hit maker EXCLUSIVELY reveals to HollywoodLife that "Rihanna is totally single again

" Although the former flames have been on and off for a while, as our source points out, we've learned what led to this most recent split! "Things kinda fizzled between her and Hassan a while ago," our insider explains

"Their lives were really busy and it was hard for her because she often didn't feel like a priority to him

" Hassan presides as the deputy president and vice chairman of Abdul Latif Jameel, a family-owned operation that runs its diversified businesses (transportation, engineering, etc

) in 30 countries. It was once even deemed the "world's largest independent distributor of Toyota and Lexus vehicles" in 2017 by Forbes Middle East! Like Rihanna, the dude is busy

Still, she's "looking for something new," our source spills.    But "new" has a loose definition, in this case

"While she would never go back to Chris [Brown] or Drake at this point in her life, she is not ruling out working things out with Hassan," our source continues

After Rihanna split from Chris for good in 2013, she went on to briefly date Drake in 2016

Jameel then came into the picture when he was photographed kissing the "Diamonds" singer in June of 2017…and not to mention the number of times RiRi was spotted with a mystery "dark-haired man" earlier that year! We're now hearing that the songstress is reminiscing on this relationship just as much as we are

"She has been using the excuse that she and Hassan have bad timing so maybe one day, when they are less busy, things could work out between them," our source goes on

And here's why she's clinging on to that "excuse."  "They had amazing chemistry together, she was really attracted to him and she does miss him," our source tells us

But don't get it twisted — this is still Bad Gal RiRi we're talking about. "In the meantime, Rihanna loves being single but it is weird for her cause she also loves having a boyfriend," our source adds

"She has been fighting off feeling lonely lately and is ready for someone new, a hero to come rescue her

" Not that Rihanna needs any saving, but hey — it doesn't hurt to have a billionaire boyfriend, or at least a cute one!

For more infomation >> Rihanna & Hassan Jameel Have Split Again: Do Either Chris Brown Or Drake Have A Chance Now? - Daily - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

They have family too please drive slowly - Duration: 0:10.

they people are loved

Ahare! oh!

For more infomation >> They have family too please drive slowly - Duration: 0:10.

-------------------------------------------

Vegetarians more miserable, have lower self-esteem than meat-eaters: scientists - Duration: 2:04.

According to study, those who cut meat from their diet harbour more negative feelings,

have low self-esteem and see less meaning in life.

A new study now has researchers saying that vegetarians may be healthier than meat-eaters

– but they are also more miserable.

A MailOnline study cites the study, where according to experts; those who cut meat from

their diet harbour more negative feelings, have low self-esteem and see less meaning

in life.

The authors further say that vegetarians may be less 'psychologically well-adjusted'.

The study comes close at the heels of food critic William Sitwell quitting as editor

of Waitrose Food magazine after making a joke about killing vegans.

Researchers asked 400 vegetarians, meat-eaters and 'semi-vegetarians' to record their

feelings over a fortnight.

It turns out that of the three groups, vegetarians experienced the most negative feelings and

enjoyed social occasions least.

Speaking about the study, lead author Dr John Nezlek, from the SWPS University of Social

Sciences and Humanities in Poznan, Poland, said that sometimes unwittingly, and sometimes

intentionally, vegetarians may be excluded from social events or made to feel odd or

different because they are vegetarians.

He further elaborated that over time, such experiences can take their toll on a person's

wellbeing.

Furthermore, a survey analysed vegetarians and meat-eaters' self-esteem based on how

far they agreed with certain statements and found vegetarians scored 4.62 for self-respect

and meat-eaters 5.33, where a lower score was worse.

They were also more likely to be depressed and unsatisfied with their life, the study

found.

The authors, also from the College of William and Mary in Virginia, suggested vegetarians

may suffer because they are seen by meat-eaters as morally superior.

The study appears in the journal Ecology of Food and Nutrition.

For more infomation >> Vegetarians more miserable, have lower self-esteem than meat-eaters: scientists - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

Mexico Reports Nearly 3,000 migrants have Abandoned Caravan, Won't go on to US - Duration: 3:06.

On Thursday, Mexican government officials reported that thousands of people have dropped

out of the Central American caravan making it's way to the U.S. southern border.

Reports indicate the long journey has taken a toll on many of the migrants, however, a

lot of the migrants are now weighing the pros and cons of successfully gaining entrance

into the United States.

AZ Central reports that about 300 migrants from Central America are staying in shelters

here deciding whether to present themselves to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers

on Sunday to request asylum in the U.S.

After traveling more than 2,500 miles in a caravan that angered President Donald Trump,

the migrants must weigh the risk of successfully passing a credible fear interview, the first

hurdle toward gaining asylum or failing the interview.

According to the Mexican government, approximately three thousand people have called it quits,

while another seven thousand or so, have decided to make the trek all the way to the U.S. southern

border.

From Washington Examiner

Nearly 3,000 migrants who had been a part of caravans moving from Central America to

the United States' southern border have abandoned the group to either stay in Mexico

or return to their home countries in Central America, according to Mexican government officials.

Mexico's Interior and Foreign Ministries reported, as of Thursday, 2,934 people originally

traveling to the U.S. have stopped and applied for asylum in Mexico.

Of those, 927 have canceled their asylum claim with the Mexican government and returned to

Guatemala and Honduras, where the caravans originated, according to a government news

release.

The two Mexican departments said federal police and immigration officers are helping transport

those who chose to return home.

For the estimated 2,000 people who remain in Mexico as they wait over the next 45 to

90 days to learn if their asylum requests have been granted, 1,553 have been put up

in shelters in the southern state of Chiapas.

Mexico's Commission for Refugee Aid is overseeing the application process and fielding all requests

for asylum, not the U.N

Another 478 people are in three shelters being overseen by the United Nations High Commissioner

for Refugees.

Approximately 4,000 people are still traveling to the country's border with America, according

to the Mexican government.

The government said one the group was expected to arrive in the Matias Romero region of Oaxaca

by Friday.

The state is 1,000 miles south of South Texas, the most southern part of the U.S.

It's not clear which part of the U.S. the group is planning to travel to.

For more infomation >> Mexico Reports Nearly 3,000 migrants have Abandoned Caravan, Won't go on to US - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

How Humans Have Wiped Out 60% Of Animal Population | In My Opinion Ep. 4 - Duration: 4:22.

While we know there is a boundary and we've drawn out these natural parks and sanctuaries,

nobody bothered to tell the tiger or an elephant that this is your boundary and you can't cross.

Just last week the World Wildlife Fund put out this major report, where it basically

found that humanity has wiped out 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles since 1970

Now, just to kind of give you an understanding of what it really means, for example, if

60% of homosapiens were to be wiped out, that would be most of Asia emptied out and

that's a huge problem.

While conservation activities have might work, for example, there are some figures that say

that conservation efforts have led to a 20% increase in the tiger population in India,

but the problem really is that we are consuming at a level that is not sustainable

and with that high amount of consumption we are now required to clear out forest lands

to convert them into farmlands.

Similarly, we cleared forest land in Maharashtra to make mines or Special Economic Zones, so many things that we do.

And human beings and animals are now in direct war with one another for the resources that

exist and sometimes for the resources that human beings create for themselves.

While doing this huge amount of activity we are giving access to these animals

to a lot of high quality and high calorie food.

For example, when you grow paddy next to an elephant habitat, just put yourself in an

elephant's place, why would an elephant want to walk around all day in a jungle foraging

when it could just quickly come, take the risk, and raid a paddy field to get the energy

it requires.

Majority of the time we have people who write to us asking, 'What can I do?

Living in a city like Bangalore or Mumbai, what can I do?.'

Obviously, you could sign a petition or feel good by sharing something on Facebook or Whatsapp,

but the solution really is that for the long term sustenance of humanity and if we believe

the survival of humanity is extremely important then we need to ensure that we protect biodiversity,

there is a direct link between the protection of diversity and the long term future.

There is also a link between food systems and the depletion of wildlife, depletion of

forest land.

So, making an informed choice as to what you consume, as to what is the impact of that

particular consumption, so that what ends up happening is that you are pushing biodiversity

just by creating the economy for biodiversity.

At this particular point in time we have created an economy for monoculture, because we all

like to eat white rice, we all like to eat broiler chicken, so we are paying for people

to not necessarily take care of biodiversity.

A lot of this could be solved by consuming less animal source protein, just diversifying

the protein intake in your diet.

Going back and eating more native grains, adding millets to your diet.

If you are working in a corporate, go to your canteen and say, "Hey, can we diversify,

can we have some sort of a millet, ragi, bajra in our food

so that we are not just supporting monocultures!"

Similarly it could be with greens or the vegetables you eat, just adding that diversity.

So that's something that you and me as individuals can do and if we really want to sustain this

planet over the next few centuries or just for the future of humanity, we need to be

looking at long term solutions to these problems which are at a micro level and not get super

romanticised by macro solutions to the human animal conflict or even habitat loss as an

issue.

For more infomation >> How Humans Have Wiped Out 60% Of Animal Population | In My Opinion Ep. 4 - Duration: 4:22.

-------------------------------------------

Israelis: Have you read the Talmud? - Duration: 3:05.

For more infomation >> Israelis: Have you read the Talmud? - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

Most Expensive Midterms In History – Candidates Have Spent Roughly $5 BILLION On Races - Duration: 6:04.

Well, with really just a few more days until the midterms, we are faced with a staggering

reality here in the United States.

That is that these midterm elections are now the most expensive midterms in the history

of the United States with a projected cost, by the end of the midterms, you know, few

days away, it's going to be over $5.2 billion that were spent on races this year.

Now, I know what a lot of people are thinking, and we've seen this talk on social media.

They say, "Well, yeah.

A lot of individual donors have stepped forward, and they're giving a ton of money.

Everything is great and wonderful."

That's not true.

Yeah, small-time donors have given a lot.

They've given a lot more than ever at this point for a midterm, but that doesn't even

come close, that doesn't even make a dent in the amount of money flowing into races,

both Democrat and Republican, from dark money sources, super PAC sources, and direct from

corporation contributions.

Here's the number.

16% of contributions to Democrats come from individuals that total less than $200.

16%.

8% going to Republicans comes from people giving less than $200.

Everything above that is coming from these massive lobbying groups, these corporate groups,

these super PACs, all kinds of dark money.

A lot of it in many of the highly contested races, Georgia, Florida, Texas, outside money,

money coming from outside the state is actually outpacing money from inside the state.

No, most of that is not coming from individual donors sending Andrew Gillum a check from

the state of Michigan.

It's coming from corporations and right-wing organizations.

Yes, there are some left-wing organizations sending money to these races as well.

Down here in Florida we've seen VoteVets come in and attack Rick Scott.

They run some great ads, and I have no problem with that.

We've seen healthcare ... Excuse me, educators, teacher's organizations spending lots of money

to elect pro-education candidates, most of that going to Democrats.

Fossil fuel companies have actually given the same amount they've always given.

They're not increasing at all.

Here's the problem I have with all of these with the exception of the money coming from

the individual donors of under $200.

We're talking about $5.2 billions dollars, 4.7 already spent.

Could that money have done something better for this country?

The answer is absolutely yes, obviously.

There is no question about it that $5 billion could have done something better than running

these ads.

I know the intentions are good, you know?

But the money coming from the teachers is nothing compared to the money coming from

the healthcare industry, coming from big pharma, coming from the NRA.

So that money, essentially, becomes wasted.

You know the NRA, they're just going to get what they always get.

We have got to do something about the funding of our elections here in the United States.

I don't want to degrade, by any means, the money coming from the individual donors, or

from the teacher's organizations.

They do phenomenal work.

They need more pay.

They need more respect.

They need more funding.

So do not take this as an attack on them whatsoever.

The point is this.

We have a very real problem with money influencing our politics.

We do, whether it's left or right.

We can't just be mad at the money on the right and not say anything about it on the left,

because we still do have securities firms, big banks that are pouring a ton of money

into Democrats this year as well.

It's not all good-hearted, well-intentioned people like the teacher's organizations or

like VoteVets.

There's a lot of really bad players out there that give so much money that these good organizations

get drowned out.

We have to put an end to it.

We have to get rid of Citizens United.

We have to put a very firm cap on how much money any person, any group, or any company

can give to a candidate.

That should be capped at 200 bucks a piece.

No more than 200 bucks, whether you're the guy living down the street from you or whether

you're Exxon-Mobile.

That's your limit.

We should have public funding of elections to match whatever is raised, as long as it's

equal between the two candidates running for that particular election.

We are spending so much money on this crap, and we've got to tone it down.

The best way to do that is to limit the amount of money people can give, overturn Citizens

United, and come up with a fund that's going to help pay for these elections and my other

plan, make networks, TV networks, donate equal time to both candidates to run their ads.

Everyone gets five slots a week.

There you have it.

That is one very simple, very easy, very quick way to fix elections, but we cannot continue

to spend $5 billion every two years on elections.

Most of that is coming from massive corporations who pay their employees slave wages, and who

want to continue to do so.

So they're actually going to spend more money on an election than they would have to spend

if they just gave everybody a raise.

That's what's so messed up about this entire system.

For more infomation >> Most Expensive Midterms In History – Candidates Have Spent Roughly $5 BILLION On Races - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

Free Speech Case Headed To Supreme Court Could Have Huge Impact On Social Media - Duration: 4:47.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether users can challenge

social media companies on free speech grounds.

While the case has nothing to do with social media on its surface, it could have broader

implications for companies like Google, or Facebook, and Twitter.

RT correspondent, Brigida Santos, joins me now with the details.

Brigida, first, tell me about the issues at the heart of this case.

What are we taking a look at that might have a vast effect on social media?

On the surface, this case looks like a dispute between a local cable station known as the

Manhattan Neighborhood Network, and two videographers whose critical segment about the network was

banned from its airwaves, along with any of their future work.

However, the case is actually much more important than it appears because the videographers

are arguing that the network is a public entity rather than a private company.

Now they say that because it works with the local government to reach viewers, it has

to follow the rules of the first amendment's state actor clause, which bans true public

entities from censoring citizens speech.

Now MNN is fighting the claims, and accusing the videographers of twisting the facts.

They maintain that they are a private company, which does give them the right to exercise

editorial control over the content that they air.

So this is really about whether the operator of a public access cable network will be considered

in the eyes of the law to be a state actor that is subject to constitutional liability.

And they're also going to look at whether the courts aired in their previous rulings

on this matter.

Well, what were those previous rulings?

I mean if I look at this case objectively, the thing I come up with ... First of all,

not Google, or none of these social medias operate without the infrastructure that was

built by taxpayers.

I don't know why everybody misses that.

Yes, they took the infrastructure that was initially built, they added to it, they modified

it, but the initial structure was paid for by taxpayers, by everybody watching this program

paid for it.

So there's at least a quasi-government relationship here, and I wonder what the previous rulings

have been in that regard.

So this is where things get really interesting.

Now the videographers had previously lost in a district court where the judge ruled

that MNN was not a state actor because only two of its 13 board members were appointed

by the state of New York, rather than a majority as outlined by precedent.

But, two out of three panel members at the second circuit court of appeals later disagreed,

stating that when a local government contracts to use private property for public expressive

activity, it does create a public forum, and it does function as a state actor.

So we're going to see how this is going to play out, but these are two different opinions

here.

So a broad ruling from the Supreme Court could potentially open technology companies like

Google, Facebook, and Twitter, to their first amendment lawsuits, which I really do believe

were way overdue for.

I mean we see right now, you've got social media that's making decisions about even who

they're going to put up.

They're making decisions of what's acceptable speech, and what's not acceptable speech.

It flies in the face of the first amendment.

And I'll tell you this, once this ruling comes out, if it is one that I see provides the

vehicle, I will go after these companies myself because I think what they're doing is extremely

dangerous.

I saw an article this week where a Christian broadcast was taken off of the air.

Somebody made the decision to take them off of the air because they were talking about

an abortion issue that they disagreed with.

I mean where does that stop.

So the first amendment test have got to take place, but we got to get some rulings first.

I wonder, do you think it's likely that the court is going to issue a ruling that restricts

social media, and what they're able to put forward as far as making decisions in-house.

This is acceptable, this is not acceptable.

What do you think the courts going to do with that.

Look, that's definitely a concern, and in a petition on behalf of the network, the company's

lawyers wrote that the second circuits implications are incredibly dangerous because the decision

will apply to areas outside the public access televisions here.

And that they will reshape all state action litigation moving forward, but we have this

question right now of when is corporate censorship government censorship?

And that's ultimately what this is really looking at.

Brigida, thanks for joining me.

Let's cover this story more going forward.

I think we might be able to get a break to where we can actually go after some of these

social media companies, and I think it's long overdue.

For more infomation >> Free Speech Case Headed To Supreme Court Could Have Huge Impact On Social Media - Duration: 4:47.

-------------------------------------------

Really Weird Rules The Royals Have About Food - Duration: 5:14.

It seems like being royalty would be the easiest job ever.

Sure, you get to travel the world, never have any financial worries, and eat all kinds of

amazing food… but there's a catch.

It turns out, mealtimes are so complicated it's enough to make anyone grateful they're

not a royal.

Even if you know your salad fork from your main course fork, you're only a fraction of

the way through royal utensil etiquette.

Royals aren't even allowed to use forks like most of us do.

Diners hold forks in their left hand, knives in their right, push food onto the back of

the fork and eat from there.

And it's the way the rest of the British population prefer to eat, as well.

That's not all.

If a royal needs to excuse themselves, they're expected to cross their utensils to signal

they'll be back, and they expect their plate to still be there.

When they're done, utensils are placed with the handles at the bottom right side of the

plate, at an angle.

Technically, this is the proper way for everyone to leave their utensils, but it's definitely

expected at royal functions.

According to Darren McGrady, who was Queen Elizabeth's personal chef for 11 years, it

doesn't matter how fast or slow anyone else eats.

The only thing that matters is when the Queen is done.

He told The Huffington Post,

"As soon as she put down her knife and fork from the first course... the footmen come

in.

The course was over and they'd start clearing, even if you hadn't finished, they'd be clearing

the table."

So, when you're dining with the queen at a formal banquet, eat quickly.

How do you know when a Queen is actually done delicately chowing down?

Just look to her purse.

When it comes to mealtimes, it's often hung from the underside of the table on a convenient

hook she carries just for that purpose.

When she places her purse on the table, that's a sign she wants the entire meal to come to

an end within the next five minutes, and what the Queen wants, the Queen gets.

But it turns out that diners aren't the only ones who have to follow the queen's whims,

because when the Queen sets foot in the kitchen to see what's going on, all meal preparation

stops.

McGrady said that it didn't matter what sort of dish you were working on when the Queen

stopped by.

All pans are moved off the stove, the chefs take three steps back and bow to the monarch,

answering any questions she might have.

Something's burning in the oven?

It doesn't matter.

It's only after she leaves that cooking can resume.

There's a way to make Royal tea, and it's very specific.

The tea goes into the cup first, then the milk is added.

When you're stirring, in can only with a back-and-forth motion while never touching the sides.

There are rules that need to be followed when you're drinking that tea, too.

Royals have to hold the cup a specific way, and contrary to popular belief, the pinkie

should never, ever be held out.

And if you slurp, or make any sound when putting the cup in its saucer?

Sorry, you're unworthy of sipping with the Royals.

There are a ton of old traditions beyond tea ceremonies that are still followed in the

Royal Family, and one of those is giving Christmas gifts to staff.

George V was reportedly the one who first gave royal staffers a Christmas pudding for

the holidays, and it's a gift-giving tradition that continues.

The royals give out about 1,500 puddings every December to their entire palace staff.

For a long time, the puddings were sourced from Fortnum & Mason, the royal grocer, but

recently, the royals have started shopping at Tesco.

That's sort of like giving everyone a fruitcake you bought at Walmart.

"Fruitcake?"

"Mm-hm."

Like long-time employees and some staffers stationed at Buckingham Palace and Windsor

Castle get something a little extra, but Christmas puddings?

It might not sound like much, but they're actually pretty delicious.

A world without garlic and onions is a world most people wouldn't want to live in, but

that's exactly the kind of situation the royals find themselves in.

Camilla Parker-Bowles explained on an episode of MasterChef Australia that the reasoning

is partly about hygiene and politeness: garlic-breath doesn't make the best impression.

It's said that the Queen's personal dislike of garlic has something to do with the ban

as well, but there's a bit of good news.

The Daily Express says this rule only applies to ultra-formal settings like state banquets.

Still, if you're dining with the Queen even casually, it's probably still off-limits.

It's no secret: the royals like their eggs.

"I can eat 50 eggs."

"Nobody can eat 50 eggs."

According to Prince Charles's former chef, there was one unbreakable rule for preparing

his eggs: they needed to be boiled for exactly four minutes.

Eggs are served with every royal breakfast and for tea, but it's usually brown eggs for

the Queen.

She says they simply taste better.

The royal obsession with eggs goes back at least to Queen Victoria, who used to eat her

boiled egg from a gold cup with a gold spoon, which is possibly the fanciest way to eat

such a normal food.

"Eggs are easy as 1-2-3.

Eggs!

In the middle of the day, anytime, anywhere, any way!

Eggs are great!"

If you expect royal dinners to be all caviar and steaks, you might be surprised to find

that's not always the case.

Former chef Carolyn Robb revealed just what got served up to royals when it was time for

just small, private meals, saying that they preferred game they killed themselves in hunts,

vegetables from their gardens, and wild mushrooms gathered from the property.

When it came to what they actually wanted to eat, it was small portions of hearty meals,

and best of all?

There were no fancy dinner settings.

Meals also included roast chicken and fish fingers for the boys, who sometimes pushed

their way into the kitchen themselves to whip up some spaghetti.

And when it was just the family, meals were often on trays in front of the fire, with

presumably no rules about which forks were off-limits.

For more infomation >> Really Weird Rules The Royals Have About Food - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Ash and Misty Have a GOOD TIME TOGETHER!!! - Duration: 10:24.

hello how're you guys doing today my name is black Tarzan and today we are

going to be talking about Ash and Misty working out together alright so if you

don't want if you want to see Ash and Misty you know exercising and working

out together all you have to do is follow the four steps all you have to do

is number one subscribe to notifications turned on number two like or dislike

this video number three leave a comment on this video or and number four share

this video now I programmed the YouTube algorithm to

not show you a Shantz and Misty you know working out together and exercise it

together unless you you know do all the forceps I just said and just case you

didn't know what I just said I'll just repeat it so if you want to see Ash and

Misty exercising and working out together you need to number one

subscribe with notifications turned on number two like or dislike this video

number three you need to leave a comment and number four you need to share this

video anyway let's get right into the video

let's go

all right so misty which is pronounced Kasumi is an inspiring water pokemon

master and a former travelling partner of ash she is also the gym leader of the

cerulean gym handing out the cascade badge to trainers who defeat her she

specializes in water type Pokemon a stubborn tomboy misty is the youngest of

four sisters who live in cerulean gym in love water flowers of cerulean city

violet explained that misty left the gym with the goal of becoming a great

pokemon trainer misty debuted in Pokemon I choose you

fishing in a nearby rat river on route 1 as her fishing rod got snagged something

she managed to pull out not a water type Pokemon but ash and has injured Pikachu

who were being chased by a flock of sparrows after pointing ash in the

direction of the nearest pokémon center the one in the one in Viridian City he

borrowed her bike saying he would return it someday in Pokemon emergency misty

appeared in the Pokemon Center after ash dropped his Pikachu holding her charred

bike and demanding a new one right away she continued following Ash as he headed

for petrol city telling him in the shadows in petal or city that she would

continue to follow him until she was paid back for her bike and we honestly

don't know if she ever got her bike if a sharor pedra for her bike consequently

misty traveled around the Kanto region the orange archipelago and the johto

region with ash she mentioned several times the purpose

was to get a shore a place for bicycle however misty often seemed to have

forgotten about the bicycle indicating the real reason for her falling along

was simply she wanted to remain with her friends

they were later joined by Brock from shadow in petra city to pokeball peril

and again from the end of the rival revival a and tracy from the law school

a press and rivalry revival during her travels with ash misty

aside from training to become the best water pokemon trainer also acted as his

coach in many Pokemon battles although misty will block away by his ear when he

approached a woman in Kanto in the bridge biting

lights camera quacks as well as once in the orange archipelago and pokeball

peril she did this far more frequently to Brock while they were in jo toe in

the water flowers of cerulean city misty challenged edge to a gym battle after

her sisters at the Cerulean City at the cerulean gym nearly gave ash cascade

badge without badda without a battle and to prove she was a good pokemon trainer

as her sister's Ash and Misty each defeated one Pokemon but Team Rocket

interrupted the match when they tried to steal two gyms water pokemon misty

sister awarded ash a badge when Pikachu saved the gym with its Thunder Bowl

misty left the gym to continue her journey as a pokemon trainer

in tentacle and tech who rule while waiting for the next ferry to the

mainland misty saw a large group of tentacle and a giant tentacle attacking

porta Vista after human activity destroyed their homes may convince the

tentacle tentacle to stop attacking the port and the humans would no longer

occupy tentacle antennae cruise home in the reef in hook line and stinker misty

competed in the annual seeking catching day after misty and Andreas both caught

seeking that weighed 55 kg misty and and Jarrett andreas battled each other in

order to break the tie misty won the competition after her Poliwhirl defeated

Andreas Poliwrath misty participated in the World Cup along ash from awk to look

till Tillery the out yes

to the perfect match she defeated ash in the second round and made it to the best

eight of the competition before she narrowly lost a Trinity and got a catch

ya later misty returns of radiancy Oakmont Center

and learned her bicycle was repaired by city's Nurse Joy

misty was shown to be sad that she no longer had a convenient excuse to travel

with ash especially when she saw that Ash hadn't learned that and had assumed

she followed him because of her bike in addition her sisty her sisters Daisy

Lily and violet cold misty at this time to tell her they were going on a world

tour and needed her to return to civilians and watched the gym in their

absence however misty saw hash truly cared for her when she saved her from a

trio of Pokemon gangsters misty wanted to stay with ash but felt it was her

responsibility to take over the gym which would be shut down if it was left

unattended upon the return of her sisters misty remained the sole cerulean

gym leader since their return only Daisy appears to spend any significant amount

of time at the gym while working at the gym misty sometimes receives help from

Tracey when he is either visiting or running an errand for Professor Oak

advance generation series misty was first mentioned by ash in trees a crowd

she reappears in the princess and the togepi to a togepi mirage where she met

up with ash and Brock again along with meeting May and Max for

the first time in a Togepi Mirage her togepi evolved into a toga chetak and

helped defend the togetic togetic paradise towards the end of the episode

togetic decides to stay with other togepi to protect them sharing one last

tearful moment with Misty she made a cameo appearance in both Saved by the

Bell dome and shocks and bonds where she was shown watching Ash compete in the

Evergrande conference she also made more appearances in this series from the ski

team to a rival real cliffhanger as well as the mastermind of Mirage Pokemon she

later appeared in flashbacks in gathering the game before she was

mentioned by ash in the English dub Jiraiya jirachi wishmaker it was

revealed in cerulean blues that misty feared Gyarados having climbed into

one's mouth as a baby she doubted her ability to run cerulean gym alone it

wasn't until she selflessly protected her gara gara dose and poison sting

assault that she was not only able to conquer her fears but regain the

confidence to run the gym with now or beating it guru dose

all right that's pretty much it for today guys I really don't have any more

information about misty at this time I hope you guys enjoyed watching the video

thank you guys so much for watching my name is black Tarzan thank you guys so

much for watching I really appreciate it peace

beuse oops

you

For more infomation >> Ash and Misty Have a GOOD TIME TOGETHER!!! - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

Nancy Pelosi: People Have To Believe We Will Win And Act Upon That Belief | AM Joy | MSNBC - Duration: 16:25.

For more infomation >> Nancy Pelosi: People Have To Believe We Will Win And Act Upon That Belief | AM Joy | MSNBC - Duration: 16:25.

-------------------------------------------

Video Shows Migrants Clashing With Police – Trump Will Have Them Shot For What They're Throwing - Duration: 4:21.

Under Obama, our Border Patrol faced serious consequences if they chose to fight back after

being attacked by illegal aliens, cartels, and thugs.

They could even go to prison, not to mention getting killed by those attacking them.

Things have changed big time under President Trump.

There's a video showing El Salvadoran migrants throwing rocks and glass bottles at a police

helicopter in Mexico.

President Trump will not stand for these vicious invaders attacking our military, police and

Border Patrol like this.

Trump is giving the nod for our boys and girls to fight back if they are attacked and they

will be armed.

From The Daily Caller:

A video released on Facebook shows some in a new migrant caravan hurling rocks at a Mexican

helicopter at the Guatemala-Mexico border Sunday.

Reuters reports that migrants clashed with police when a group breached a gate, and that

one person was killed.

Guatemalan officials said the migrants threw rocks and glass bottles at police officers.

The video from Sunday, by Facebook user Chuy Saldana, shows young men throwing rocks at

the helicopter circling above.

One of the migrants also seemed to be carrying what appeared to be an unlit Molotov cocktail

on the bridge that connects Mexico and Guatemala.

The Daily Caller reached out to Saldana for comment on the video.

Saldana told The Caller, "It was recorded on Sunday, October 28, as at 5:30 in the afternoon.

This was on the border of Mexico and Guatemala I recorded that piece of video in a live broadcast."

The group behaving violently were part of 300 Salvadorans who left the nation's capital

of San Salvador on Sunday, according to Reuters.

The report details how law enforcement is struggling to deal with the new group.

According to Reuters:

A third group broke through a gate at the Guatemala border with Mexico in Tecun Uman

on Sunday, and clashed with police.

Local first responders said that security forces used rubber bullets against the migrants,

and that one person, Honduran Henry Adalid, 26, was killed.

Six police officers were injured, said Beatriz Marroquin, the director of health for the

Retalhuleu region.

Mexico's Interior Minister Alfonso Navarrete told reporters on Sunday evening that federal

police did not have any weapons, even to fire plastic bullets.

He said that some of the migrants had guns while others had Molotov cocktails, and this

information had been passed on to other Central American governments.

Guatemala's government said in a statement that it regrets that the migrants didn't

take the opportunity of dialogue and instead threw stones and glass bottles at police.

Thousands more Central American migrants are ahead of this group in another caravan that

is currently traveling through Mexico on the way to the U.S. border.

Fox News reporter Griff Jenkins reported Tuesday that the caravan was being chartered to the

U.S. border by tour buses.

(RELATED: New Images Show Exactly How Massive The Migrant Caravan Is)

"We've seen the 5,000-strong caravan walking to the border, but now they're waiting for

a ride to the border," he said.

"This is the first time I have seen an organized bus operation from the state of Oaxaca actually

getting volunteer buses to put people … on them and take them to their next location."

Getty Images has previously shown the migrant caravan traveling by raft and flatbed truck.

President Donald Trump has made the migrant caravans a key talking point of the 2018 midterm

elections.

Trump has also dispatched thousands of armed U.S. military members to the southern border

that will be authorized to shoot migrants throwing rocks, according to the President's

comments Thursday.

For more infomation >> Video Shows Migrants Clashing With Police – Trump Will Have Them Shot For What They're Throwing - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Have a Little Hell to Salt Your Heaven - Duration: 0:52.

Have a little Hell to salt your Heaven, A dash of horror in your well-whipped cream.

Love and joy are not all you've been given.

Let some unsavory nightmare spice your dream!

Open up your long-sealed inner dungeon Wherein you keep the monsters of your heart.

Enjoy one midnight just a rare smoked smidgeon, Exquisite taste of what you are, in part,

Night shades for your culinary art!

For more infomation >> Have a Little Hell to Salt Your Heaven - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Sam Bradford: Will Jaguars, Giants Have Any Interest? | Heavy.com - Duration: 5:25.

Sam Bradford: Will Jaguars, Giants Have Any Interest? | Heavy.com

Another year calls for another NFL team getting nothing out of Sam Bradford.

Once upon a time, the former Oklahoma Sooner was at the top of his game as he was drafted No.

1 overall, and won Offensive Rookie of the Year.

Now, his skillset is not much better than any other backup, but his salary has been ridiculously overrated for the past few years.

Somehow, the Arizona Cardinals thought it would be a great idea to sign Bradford to a $40 million contract for two year's, according to Over The Cap.

After an abysmal start to the season, Bradford was sent to the bench mid-game for rookie quarterback, Josh Rosen.

Then, the Cardinals held on to Bradford, as they kept him inactive for weeks to save money.

When the trade deadline came and went without a deal coming in for Bradford, the Cardinals decided that enough was enough.

And on Saturday afternoon, they finally got rid of Bradford.

Now, he will have to go through waiver claims to see if any team will pick him up.

While there are teams that could use a quarterback, Bradford comes with a steep price to pay.

How Much Is Bradford Worth?.

Seeing as though Bradford would come with a ridiculous contract that includes $20 million for next season makes it very tough to imagine that the veteran quarterback will find another team this season.

After all, though, this is Sam Bradford that we are talking about.

The same guy that cost the Minnesota Vikings a first-round pick just a few seasons ago.

Some teams could use a quarterback right now.

The Jacksonville Jaguars, New York Giants, Buffalo Bills, heck, even the Oakland Raiders could use one.

But will any team be willing to bring on Bradford? Specifically the Jags or the Giants, who could be decent teams that are at a roadblock because of their poor quarterback play.

Who Is/Isn't Interested?.

Automatically, Bradford was linked to the New York Giants as he has had ties with some of their staff.

For instance, Bradford's offensive coordinator during his tenure with the Philadelphia Eagles was Giants head coach, Pat Shurmur.

Seeing as though the situation with Eli Manning has gone sour over in New York, Bradford could potentially bring a different spark to the offense.

It doesn't look like he will, though.

According to ESPN's Dianna Russini, the Giants have "No Interest" in bringing Bradford to New York.

As for the Jaguars, it's unknown as to whether they have any plans to make Bradford Blake Bortles replacement in 2018.

Many speculate, and are open to the fact that Bradford and the Jags could a good match, but would it be worth it for them at this point?.

The Jaguars are currently 3-5 on the season, sitting at the bottom of their division.

And although Bortles has been wildly underwhelming, the Jaguars issues are more than just the quarterback position.

Bringing on a contract like that should only be for teams that are in the position to make a second-half run.

We'll see what happens on Monday, as teams will have the opportunity to claim Bradford from waivers.

For more infomation >> Sam Bradford: Will Jaguars, Giants Have Any Interest? | Heavy.com - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

When You Have A Target Set - Duration: 1:56.

hey what's up guys so I'm in Monte Sano State Park today and I started the

trail today I didn't know what the destination will look like for this trail

but I was just going you know dimensionless target less and I was

going towards that and I didn't have any speed or I didn't you know thought about

the end of this trail how would it look like because like it's fall right now

and it's like all colourful everywhere every leaf you know wherever you see

when I reach the end of the trail I was happy just keep this in mind I said

I was happy when I reached the destination and now when I was coming

back I was thirsty because I didn't have my water bottle with me it was in my car

and I walked like two and a half miles or more than that and I was thirsty

and I have something in mind I'll go back and I'll take that water bottle and

drink it I know the satisfaction which I'll get once I'll reach there started

started going back I know going back to the car in the end of the you know trail

when I was almost there to reach to my car I was feeling I don't know I was

feeling like I'm walking fast I'm finding this efficient ways to reach

there and it was funny I mean when I was going back to

the destination of this trail I was like I didn't know any target I didn't know

how does it look like but when I was coming back I knew I knew I'm gonna have

this water and and I knew my target right lesson from this video is you know

when you know your target you know where you're going you know your direction

you're going and that's why once you have a target

you succeed in an efficient way in a increasing manner in a progressive

manner so how do you take this part how do you like this talk tell me in the

comments

For more infomation >> When You Have A Target Set - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Introduction - Let's have a chat - Duration: 2:57.

Hi, my name is Nat Richards,

and I'm a consultant and sales manager

for Techs On The Move who are based here in Sydney Australia

as you can see over my shoulder.

The reason why I've put this introductory video out there

is because I would like to basically introduce myself

a little bit to you.

You've made contact with us and told us a little bit about yourself

which is really appreciated and I thought I would

do the same to you

My role with Techs On The Move is two sided.

I'm both a consultant, dealing with people like yourself

on the other side of the planet who are

interested in coming into Australia,

or want a little more information about it.

But I'm also the sales manager for this company

so that means I've got a direct link with you and

the Australian automotive industry all over the place.

I've got my finger on the pulse so whenever we're talking about

what options you might have here

I'm definitely up to speed on that.

So the whole idea here is really to encourage you to

make contact with us.

We often find that people reach out one way or another

to ________ just coming to Australia and then

and then it can be a little hard

to get much conversation happening after that.

The reason why that bothers us is not so that we can put our

claws into you and drag you down a wormhole,

but because we think it's very difficult for you to

weight up the options

and the decisions you might have to make infront of you

if you don't have the information to do that with.

Consultation for us is something we bang on about a lot,

but it's not there to pressure you, it's really so we can

give you all the tools and the info to make that decision,

whether it would be in the next couple of months or couple of years.

There is really no time pressure around this whole thing from us,

we're certainly not going to push you into anything.

It's all about you, you're very much in the driver seat.

So there is no obligations, no fees for

consulting with us through an introductory call like this.

It's all about making sure hat the information

you is personalised and specific to your circumstance,

instead of the same old generic stuff that you can get out of google

or perhaps learn from someone else who's done this before you.

Your circumstances might be different.

The steps should be really basic,

You're already doing step two,

from the page you've taken this link from

is to read our preparation ____________ .

It's short, easy to read and there is

at least one or two video in there,

and it will give you the basics around what

coming to Australia is all about

so that when we launch into a consultation call,

hopefully everything won't feel completely new to you.

The following step after that is to arrange time to make that chat.

You should be able to find your way into a calendar

where you can select your own time to talk to me.

My live calendar will be up there to pick from.

Hopefully you will be able to find a time that suits you,

might be a little early, might be a little late,

but I guarantee that I do my fair share of

out of office hours call as well

to try and make the time up across the time divide.

So by all means, click and tell me how you want to make contact

and we'll follow it up from there.

Once we've had that call, we'll figure it out.

There is no set way to do this, and it's entirely up to you.

Hope to hear from you soon, thanks very much.