Youtube daily we Nov 6 2018

Translator: Joseph Geni Reviewer: Krystian Aparta

There was a day, about 10 years ago,

when I asked a friend to hold a baby dinosaur robot upside down.

It was this toy called a Pleo that I had ordered,

and I was really excited about it because I've always loved robots.

And this one has really cool technical features.

It had motors and touch sensors

and it had an infrared camera.

And one of the things it had was a tilt sensor,

so it knew what direction it was facing.

And when you held it upside down,

it would start to cry.

And I thought this was super cool, so I was showing it off to my friend,

and I said, "Oh, hold it up by the tail. See what it does."

So we're watching the theatrics of this robot

struggle and cry out.

And after a few seconds,

it starts to bother me a little,

and I said, "OK, that's enough now.

Let's put him back down."

And then I pet the robot to make it stop crying.

And that was kind of a weird experience for me.

For one thing, I wasn't the most maternal person at the time.

Although since then I've become a mother, nine months ago,

and I've learned that babies also squirm when you hold them upside down.

(Laughter)

But my response to this robot was also interesting

because I knew exactly how this machine worked,

and yet I still felt compelled to be kind to it.

And that observation sparked a curiosity

that I've spent the past decade pursuing.

Why did I comfort this robot?

And one of the things I discovered was that my treatment of this machine

was more than just an awkward moment in my living room,

that in a world where we're increasingly integrating robots into our lives,

an instinct like that might actually have consequences,

because the first thing that I discovered is that it's not just me.

In 2007, the Washington Post reported that the United States military

was testing this robot that defused land mines.

And the way it worked was it was shaped like a stick insect

and it would walk around a minefield on its legs,

and every time it stepped on a mine, one of the legs would blow up,

and it would continue on the other legs to blow up more mines.

And the colonel who was in charge of this testing exercise

ends up calling it off,

because, he says, it's too inhumane

to watch this damaged robot drag itself along the minefield.

Now, what would cause a hardened military officer

and someone like myself

to have this response to robots?

Well, of course, we're primed by science fiction and pop culture

to really want to personify these things,

but it goes a little bit deeper than that.

It turns out that we're biologically hardwired to project intent and life

onto any movement in our physical space that seems autonomous to us.

So people will treat all sorts of robots like they're alive.

These bomb-disposal units get names.

They get medals of honor.

They've had funerals for them with gun salutes.

And research shows that we do this even with very simple household robots,

like the Roomba vacuum cleaner.

(Laughter)

It's just a disc that roams around your floor to clean it,

but just the fact it's moving around on its own

will cause people to name the Roomba

and feel bad for the Roomba when it gets stuck under the couch.

(Laughter)

And we can design robots specifically to evoke this response,

using eyes and faces or movements

that people automatically, subconsciously associate

with states of mind.

And there's an entire body of research called human-robot interaction

that really shows how well this works.

So for example, researchers at Stanford University found out

that it makes people really uncomfortable

when you ask them to touch a robot's private parts.

(Laughter)

So from this, but from many other studies,

we know, we know that people respond to the cues given to them

by these lifelike machines,

even if they know that they're not real.

Now, we're headed towards a world where robots are everywhere.

Robotic technology is moving out from behind factory walls.

It's entering workplaces, households.

And as these machines that can sense and make autonomous decisions and learn

enter into these shared spaces,

I think that maybe the best analogy we have for this

is our relationship with animals.

Thousands of years ago, we started to domesticate animals,

and we trained them for work and weaponry and companionship.

And throughout history, we've treated some animals like tools or like products,

and other animals, we've treated with kindness

and we've given a place in society as our companions.

I think it's plausible we might start to integrate robots in similar ways.

And sure, animals are alive.

Robots are not.

And I can tell you, from working with roboticists,

that we're pretty far away from developing robots that can feel anything.

But we feel for them,

and that matters,

because if we're trying to integrate robots into these shared spaces,

we need to understand that people will treat them differently than other devices,

and that in some cases,

for example, the case of a soldier who becomes emotionally attached

to the robot that they work with,

that can be anything from inefficient to dangerous.

But in other cases, it can actually be useful

to foster this emotional connection to robots.

We're already seeing some great use cases,

for example, robots working with autistic children

to engage them in ways that we haven't seen previously,

or robots working with teachers to engage kids in learning with new results.

And it's not just for kids.

Early studies show that robots can help doctors and patients

in health care settings.

This is the PARO baby seal robot.

It's used in nursing homes and with dementia patients.

It's been around for a while.

And I remember, years ago, being at a party

and telling someone about this robot,

and her response was,

"Oh my gosh.

That's horrible.

I can't believe we're giving people robots instead of human care."

And this is a really common response,

and I think it's absolutely correct,

because that would be terrible.

But in this case, it's not what this robot replaces.

What this robot replaces is animal therapy

in contexts where we can't use real animals

but we can use robots,

because people will consistently treat them more like an animal than a device.

Acknowledging this emotional connection to robots

can also help us anticipate challenges

as these devices move into more intimate areas of people's lives.

For example, is it OK if your child's teddy bear robot

records private conversations?

Is it OK if your sex robot has compelling in-app purchases?

(Laughter)

Because robots plus capitalism

equals questions around consumer protection and privacy.

And those aren't the only reasons

that our behavior around these machines could matter.

A few years after that first initial experience I had

with this baby dinosaur robot,

I did a workshop with my friend Hannes Gassert.

And we took five of these baby dinosaur robots

and we gave them to five teams of people.

And we had them name them

and play with them and interact with them for about an hour.

And then we unveiled a hammer and a hatchet

and we told them to torture and kill the robots.

(Laughter)

And this turned out to be a little more dramatic

than we expected it to be,

because none of the participants would even so much as strike

these baby dinosaur robots,

so we had to improvise a little, and at some point, we said,

"OK, you can save your team's robot if you destroy another team's robot."

(Laughter)

And even that didn't work. They couldn't do it.

So finally, we said,

"We're going to destroy all of the robots

unless someone takes a hatchet to one of them."

And this guy stood up, and he took the hatchet,

and the whole room winced as he brought the hatchet down

on the robot's neck,

and there was this half-joking, half-serious moment of silence in the room

for this fallen robot.

(Laughter)

So that was a really interesting experience.

Now, it wasn't a controlled study, obviously,

but it did lead to some later research that I did at MIT

with Palash Nandy and Cynthia Breazeal,

where we had people come into the lab and smash these HEXBUGs

that move around in a really lifelike way, like insects.

So instead of choosing something cute that people are drawn to,

we chose something more basic,

and what we found was that high-empathy people

would hesitate more to hit the HEXBUGS.

Now this is just a little study,

but it's part of a larger body of research

that is starting to indicate that there may be a connection

between people's tendencies for empathy

and their behavior around robots.

But my question for the coming era of human-robot interaction

is not: "Do we empathize with robots?"

It's: "Can robots change people's empathy?"

Is there reason to, for example,

prevent your child from kicking a robotic dog,

not just out of respect for property,

but because the child might be more likely to kick a real dog?

And again, it's not just kids.

This is the violent video games question, but it's on a completely new level

because of this visceral physicality that we respond more intensely to

than to images on a screen.

When we behave violently towards robots,

specifically robots that are designed to mimic life,

is that a healthy outlet for violent behavior

or is that training our cruelty muscles?

We don't know ...

But the answer to this question has the potential to impact human behavior,

it has the potential to impact social norms,

it has the potential to inspire rules around what we can and can't do

with certain robots,

similar to our animal cruelty laws.

Because even if robots can't feel,

our behavior towards them might matter for us.

And regardless of whether we end up changing our rules,

robots might be able to help us come to a new understanding of ourselves.

Most of what I've learned over the past 10 years

has not been about technology at all.

It's been about human psychology

and empathy and how we relate to others.

Because when a child is kind to a Roomba,

when a soldier tries to save a robot on the battlefield,

or when a group of people refuses to harm a robotic baby dinosaur,

those robots aren't just motors and gears and algorithms.

They're reflections of our own humanity.

Thank you.

(Applause)

For more infomation >> Why we have an emotional connection to robots | Kate Darling - Duration: 11:52.

-------------------------------------------

Hawk Zone: we recap last Sunday's Seahawks game against the Chargers - Duration: 7:48.

For more infomation >> Hawk Zone: we recap last Sunday's Seahawks game against the Chargers - Duration: 7:48.

-------------------------------------------

We played Pictionary with AI – and lost - Duration: 7:58.

(gentle music)

- What do you see in these pictures?

Objects, faces, or do they just look

like random arrangements of lines and blobs?

If you don't see anything specific it's probably

because you're not a computer.

These pictures were specially designed

to be recognized by machine vision algorithms.

You see blobs, they see a shark,

binoculars, explicit nudity.

But the algorithms that see these things

are the same ones being used

in more and more parts of everyday life.

They steer self-driving cars, they monitor content

on the internet and they even unlock your phone.

And the fact that they don't see the world the same way

you do it could be a problem.

(cosmic music)

The science of teaching computers to see goes back

to the 1960s and it coincides with the creation

of the field of artificial intelligence.

Early computer vision systems were very basic.

They could process only the simplest versions of 3D scenes

rendering the world in crude shapes and planes.

But in recent years a revolution in AI,

particularly deep learning, has created sophisticated

vision systems which can outperform humans

at a number of tasks.

To date we've used deep learning to create vision

algorithms that can identify cancerous tumors

better than a doctor or tell the difference

between a hundred different dog breeds in a millisecond.

Or they can just tell you whether the food

on your plate is a hotdog or not.

Okay, most humans can do that too.

But for all these achievements AI doesn't look

at the world the same way humans do

and that's what these bizarre prints

are meant to demonstrate.

They're the work of Tom White, an academic

and an artist from New Zealand.

He made them by essentially reverse engineering

a number of vision systems like those used

by Google and Amazon.

- So I started looking at these classifier networks

which knew how to classify or how to understand

an image and I was wondering if I can invert that process.

- [James] The prints are generated using a production line

of algorithmic programs.

First, a drawing system generates some abstract lines

and the image is fed into a machine vision classifier

which then tries to guess what object it might be.

Based on the classifier's guesses the drawing system

then tweaks the image and feeds it through again.

- I mostly take a hands-off approach because I really want

to know how the algorithms see the world.

And so after I set the systems up I kind of sit back

and let it run for a long time and see what comes out.

- [James] But if that's an algorithm's view

what does it look like to humans?

We asked Verge staff to guess which object

each print represented.

In essence we asked people can you think like a computer?

- Okay, you want me to say what I think that is?

- Like I'm just imagining like it's under water

and they're a bunch of fish or bugs.

- This one just looks like hot topic.

- A car?

- [Tom] It's a Starfish.

- It's a starfish, great.

- A train on train tracks, subway.

- This is someone getting pushed in front of a train.

- It definitely looks like somebody's conducting

with the wave motions.

- Like something on a stove?

- [Tom] It's a spider.

- Oh, for real?

- (chuckles) Okay.

- This is a dancing elephant.

- Like the wheel of a boat.

- An elephant.

- This was a whale.

Is that a whale?

Did people do good on this?

Like am I the, okay.

- Tom's work plays with the limits of AI

but in an abstract way.

So here's a more concrete example.

Let's say you're a computer scientist

and you're training a machine learning program

to recognize animals at the zoo.

You would collect a bunch of pictures of zebras, lions,

giraffes, et cetera, and you'd feed them into this algorithm

which would then look for patters in this data.

So after studying the pictures it might conclude

that if it sees something with a long neck, boom, giraffe.

If it sees stripes that's a zebra and so on.

There are problems with this approach though.

First, the algorithm doesn't know anything

about the world beyond that data.

So if you get a new edition to the zoo,

like a penguin, it's not gonna know what that is.

The second problem is that the way it makes decisions

might not be very sensible.

If it decides that all animals with stripes are zebras,

for example, what happens when it sees a tiger?

This is why researchers often describe AI

as narrow or brittle.

These systems only work in very limited scenarios

and when they come across unexpected data

they often break down.

This becomes really clear when you look back at Tom's art.

For example, look at this red print here (cello music).

The object it's supposed to represent is a cello.

You can see the curves of the body of the instrument

and the vertical lines with strings.

But there's also this other shape hovering

behind it in light red.

That's the person playing the cello.

Now the reason this figure appears is because the pictures

that we used to train the algorithm

included the cellos and the cellists too.

But because the program has no understanding

of what an instrument or a musician is

it just blurs the two together.

Or there's Tom's tricycle.

- [Tom] When I see a tricycle the first thing I think

about are the wheels and maybe in the back

of my head I count them.

- [James] But vision algorithms are terrible at counting

so the number of wheels is no help.

They lock onto the shape of the frame, a triangle,

and think that that represents the essence

of a tricycle at its best.

- To me this shape that it comes up with

doesn't remind me of a tricycle.

It looks like a bunch of lines but I guess I gain

an appreciation for the different ways of viewing things,

It's almost like visiting another culture

that has different ways of interpreting

or relating to objects.

- [James] To drive home the differences between human

and machine vision we decided to turn the tables

on the algorithms.

So we took the same objects in Tom's art

and abstracted them using a human algorithm.

We made the algorithm play Pictionary against us.

- So I'm drawing a spider, weirdly kind of intimidates me.

See what the computer thinks.

Well they said it was an invertebrate but I actually

can't remember now if spiders are invertebrates or not.

- The cello says text, black and white drawing, wing, joint.

The cellos are more complex so it didn't get that at all,

like anywhere near that.

- But why does this matter?

Well because despite the limitations of machine vision

we're trusting it with more and more aspects of our lives.

Take self-driving cars, for example.

In the future, the idea is that they'll rely totally

on what computers can and cannot see, no humans needed.

So teaching a machine to spot the difference

between a pedestrian and a stop sign will literally

be a life or death matter.

The first fatal crash involving Tesla's self-driving

self-drive, for example, was partly caused

by algorithms which couldn't distinguish

between the side of a white tractor trailer

and the bright sky behind it.

And when you think about the other places we're starting

to use these algorithms in CCTV cameras,

in military drones, it becomes worrying.

Now this doesn't mean we're building

completely broken systems.

Machine learning engineers are aware of these shortcomings

and most algorithms, like the ones we described,

still have humans in the loop somewhere making decisions.

And Tom, he takes solace in the fact that the algorithms

aren't any smarter than this.

He suggests that we should be thankful that a computer

still struggles to count the numbers

of wheels on a tricycle.

- I think it's kind of refreshing to see

even when they have very simple models of the world,

in a way that's comforting.

It's good to know how these things work.

It sometimes can give us insight into different ways

that we can see the world.

- [Lady] In this one I have birds, like it's a bird.

It's a bird maybe being crushed in someone's fist.

It's like a bird.

- [Tom] It's a butterfly.

- It's a but, yeah okay.

- [Tom] I like the stories. - I see it.

- [Tom] A bird being crushed in someone's fist?

For more infomation >> We played Pictionary with AI – and lost - Duration: 7:58.

-------------------------------------------

Stop Blaming Everything on Donald Trump | We The Internet TV - Duration: 1:40.

Stop blaming everything on Donald Trump.

Gabriel Sherman at Vanity Fair described Trump's America as a vicious and divided place,

where a man in his 60s walked into Sherman's 15-month-old daughter

knocking her to the ground with a bloody nose.

Now, that is awful.

But Donald Trump is not responsible for the actions of that rude man,

nor is he responsible for what happened next.

When Sherman rushed over and picked her up,

the old man casually walked away as Sherman's daughter wailed.

Sherman said, "Sir, excuse me. How about an apology?"

And then the guy's nasty rich wife said,

"Well, how about you apologize to us?"

Hold on, this old man gave your daughter a bloody nose,

and all you did was say, "Sir, excuse me. How about an apology?"

And you tweeted that story out?

You didn't even make something up to make yourself look good?

Like, "Yeah, man, it took two guys and the spirit of FDR to hold me back from annihilating that guy."

Who do you think you're winning over to your side, man?

Blaming Donald Trump for your lack of testicular fortitude?

Hey, a little toxic masculinity can go a long way when defending your infant daughter and appealing to voters.

Exhibits A through Z: Donald Trump.

Come on, bro, wear the pussy hat. Don't be the pussy hat.

Hey guys, thanks for watching.

If you enjoyed the video, please like it, share it with your friends, and subscribe to our channel.

Make sure you click the little bell to turn on notifications so you never miss a video.

And if you really liked the video, you can even support We The Internet TV on Patreon.

Check out the link in the description below.

For more infomation >> Stop Blaming Everything on Donald Trump | We The Internet TV - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Τουρμπίζουμε το παπί - We turbocharge our cub - turbo honda cub - Duration: 10:07.

we will supercharge the cub

with this turbine

I do not think it will succeed but

I imagine

many have this craziness

but never did it

because they did know how or not have money or anything else

either way

The point is that I do not have the knowledge of a mechanic, I'm not a mechanic

my brother is a mechanic

He clearly will help me

but basically I have no idea

I've read different things on the internet and we'll see what's going to happen

This is a turbine I bought the internet was not expensive had 130 euros

lets go to do the basics

we will come across too many technical problems

I'm thinking of some already

but we will discuss them as we go along

we will see what lies ahead

In any case now this bike If I remember well

we made it with whatever we had

a head from an Astrea, with a 51 millimeter piston

lets take out the carburetor

these things, I imagine you know them, so we do not need to record them so accurately

lets do a quick testfit

oh dude Something does not fit here

can get in the other way round

somehow it will fit

it touches the head valve cover

OH my good mother

it looks good

speaking about chinese... this can very well be the only reason not to run

It could work with another turbine but because it is Chinese

it might not work

I am eaten by mosquitoes

we can turn it a little this way

to put the oil in the turbine, getting it from an aftermarket oil cooler

run it from here, bringing it into the turbo

you will need a small spacer here

because it touches the valve lid

and here we have to put this screw

we have to clear the threads

and put this kind of screw

I think this is the smallest operation we can do

by opening a small groove here

in order to pass

such a screw

to do this all, we have to block all the holes

it is generally best to close all the holes until you ready all the parts and match them

we block them like this

with one leash we'll try to grind it down so as to fit the screw through

exactly as big as the screw

We're ok I think

I should do it 56mm(the piston) to work properly

this is the result

here where we want to pass the screw

we want to give it room to get the head of the screw

the other isue is that there must be room to put a tool to tighten the screw

happily there is room, or else.....

It is perfect we will do the other side light light when we go to put it here to screw

we will do the same on the other side

light

light

when we go to put it here, to tight it

like this

The problem here is

that probably we can not even put the exhaust

also

we can not put the oil supply

on the valve anyway

We have to bring it here to lubricate the camshaft and not the valve

It's not so easy

apart that it's not nice

one is sure that you will assemble them and disassemble these 800 times until they fit

we will put 2 spacers

one on the head

and the other on the turbo

and then find any holes match

Oh my mother what quality is this

lets see

we need to grow these holes

anyway, this spacer costs 3,5 euros

maybe it can fit the other way round

either here

the screw is a bit out

I'll eat it with the angle grinder

very hot

now we're okay

bit here bit there, it will fit, in theory.....

anyhow

this is the general idea

this is how it will fit

it just clears the valve cover

when I tighten it will fit better

and the oil will come out to go in the cooler

through here....

we will see when the time comes

i still dont know where to place the oil cooler, it depends on the exhaust...

it is a very convenient spot

For more infomation >> Τουρμπίζουμε το παπί - We turbocharge our cub - turbo honda cub - Duration: 10:07.

-------------------------------------------

Part 1: "We Done Without" - West of West Virginia - Duration: 8:39.

For more infomation >> Part 1: "We Done Without" - West of West Virginia - Duration: 8:39.

-------------------------------------------

Rep. Gaetz: We need Republicans to get out and vote - Duration: 4:56.

For more infomation >> Rep. Gaetz: We need Republicans to get out and vote - Duration: 4:56.

-------------------------------------------

Baxter Dury, Etienne de Crécy & Delilah Holliday : « We are the future ! » - Duration: 11:30.

We were talking anyway probably, we had mentioned it when we first worked

together on Super Discount that we would eventually work together at some point. I

was just in Paris and I think I text you, and we quickly...we met up.

No, no it was just like let's have time in the studio and see what happens. BD: With each other.

Actually like the first session we had two or three songs...really good, and we were like...wow.

The game changed I think actually when Delilah came on really, I mean that's what we were looking for,

we had these sort of ok skeletons and when Delilah came it really made it

something special. DH: Thanks. BD: It's alright, it's true though, I don't...you know, I don't usually say things like that.

Yeah definitely, I like that philosophily, philosophily?…

That's like a Turkish dish but um... it's, I like that... I can't say

that word, philosophy. Generally with music I find I like to strip it all back

down, simple is best, when it works without

anything really happening I think it really works personally.

Yeah, but actually when there is not too much that happens that works always.

Yeah, it's like a small engine supporting... I was about to say a boring story, but not

only because of some of the stories I made up. It's a small engine supporting

an emotional narrative. Does that?...That doesn't make sense, sorry, I'm going to stop talking.

I tried to put more stuff in the production but it didn't work, every time you know

it's one sound too much. Then we threw everything away.

It wasn't they made me feel very welcome and, yeah I've had a lot of fun making the record.

Because they were laughing at my accent, that made the

sessions really easy. BD: I had to translate quite a lot in English, no one spoke French.

You mean for this project? Yeah I mean we were working together and then...No I don't remember how we did...

I think some of them happened in different ways,

some of them were based on like backing track ideas you had already, had

a few of those, and then some we'd just invent on the spot. It was all very

spontaneous and if it wasn't spontaneous we became tired and

basically, not even joking, went for lunch. If it didn't... something didn't

happen very quickly whether it was a story or a melody or a voice melody or

musically we just sort of stopped and we'd go on about other... you know we would

concentrate on other things we were doing. So it was just a

very quick process I think. It took a while for it to take shape, for us to

make the right decisions about what we liked and then it started to be very

obvious, and then it was quite quick. I think when you go into song world unless

you honor the singer with the music it doesn't work. So if you try and honor the

music more than you do the singer, depending on the type of music, the

balance isn't right so something like this was very story led so you had to

kind of honor the voice, so it became the very dominant feature...aspect. EDC: Yeah, and it's

easier to me you know when... it's easier because the focus is not on the music, the focus

has to be on the voices.

That was where we...Etienne was more adamant, he was stronger about the

idea of finding someone that wasn't... it wasn't whether it was a female or male

voice or something, just someone singing more melodic things, just

finding somebody different with a more unique voice and trying to

get away from a tradition of what people do a lot, kind of this soft male/female

vocal arrangement which is very traditional. Possibly quite

traditional in France I guess, that thing.

Someone introduced me to Delilah... and I just... Delilah's band is pretty

ferocious, I mean it's a pretty hardcore band, so you're doing something quite

different here than what you had done over the last couple of years,

right? DH: Yeah, definitely. BD: So, we didn't quite know what your singing voice was going to be like

in a way, because she gives it quite a lot when she sings in Skinny Girl Diet,

you know it's pretty hardcore sometimes isn't it? DH: Yeah we scream a lot. BD: Pretty intimidating for a couple of old dudes.

Yeah definitely, it's so boring just to have a closed mind and just make one particular

music, like life's too short to just do one thing.

Transgenre, I mean we are transgenre. BD: We are the future. Full stop.

Well...I mean the B.E.D and the, you know... It's about regret and things...it's not quite as... DH: That's really

interesting though, I love that concept. BD: It's not quite as callous as that, you know, not quite as

unemotional. DH: It could be seen as that though.

Well, it could've been, yeah. DH: I like it, it's definitely interesting. BD: It's a good French view of it.

Two minutes is perfect timing for a song I guess. BD: Yeah I think so, I think it's about raw...

that minimalist amount of data, it only should happen that quickly, you

don't need more than two minutes otherwise it becomes a responsibility to listen to it.

It's interesting to step out of your comfort zone. I'm a dictator,

you know, I've set up my... not dictator but I've set up my world where

I can control it, you know, and that's what I do and it's all about me and my...

cups with... like things with my face on them or whatever, you know, and it's interesting.

To see how that works, dynamics between more than just you making decisions, I think that's very

interesting. It's relatively pain-free, the actual experience of making

it has been really easy, wasn't it really? EDC: Yes we were mostly agreeing on

everything. There was not like hours of discussion:

"I like this hi-hat sound, I prefer this bass", that was pretty fast. For me

anyway, all the music I've made in collaboration with people I always

prefer to my own music. You know it's better to me because it's something

that's not for me, I prefer collaboration. But I have to

stand alone at my studio also.

Well like Baxter said I came from a punk band and I was in the process of making

my own solo project, so it taught me a lot about vocals and using like a higher

register and yeah just experimenting and just being free. And I never really

worked with anyone before so it was really fun to just work and write and, yeah

I love Etienne's music as well so it's been a great experience.

We talked about the more... not particular albums, I think we talked about kind of sonic stuff from

the 80s and... you know I kind of like what it sounds like. We used some of the

equipment that was from that era so we talked about kind of more European

hip-hop from the 80s almost sometimes badly done, or well done, or you

know mute records, things like Suicide and all those kinds of records. It

was a vague outline wasn't it? That we had when we talked about it and we talked

about hip hop quite a lot. EDC: Yes, yeah, yeah. BD: Naive hip hop. EDC: Hip hop

without samples, hip hop with just synthesiser and the rhythm box, really early hip hop.

But we didn't listen to a lot of music when we were working, we didn't have really

strong references. I've been working with a band called the Sleaford Mods and they

have a very simple set up and I was always quite inspired by that.

Just love, for me actually. BD: Yeah it was mostly fun actually. I mean some of

the things... I'm really impressed by the sound of the album generally so

that's down to Etienne and Delilah's singing is probably the best thing

I've ever worked with really. I mean singers, you know, when you think about

singing you start to worry about someone going "BLAH", you know like drowning

out the room. But singing in its truest sense is about understanding

words and melodies, just...it's like a wine

its got history to it and Delilah's voice is quite incredible I think like that.

Exactly, the first time you sing, you know when we did the session

with Delilah for the first time and we listened to her voice and that was

exactly the point you know, immediately that was wow, okay it's done. And we didn't make

many takes. It was right. BD: No, no, not at all no. It's the person that makes a good singer not the voice

or not the bellity or how long the notes are, it's something to do with the person and

that's why it's mysterious, but it's very good.

Thanks guys, wow, yeah I agree with these two it's just a

dream team and we just all complement each other so well. I think the thing I

hate the most is the fact that I've got to leave Paris and go back to London.

For more infomation >> Baxter Dury, Etienne de Crécy & Delilah Holliday : « We are the future ! » - Duration: 11:30.

-------------------------------------------

We have negative unemployment effectively in US today: Rep. Issa - Duration: 2:35.

For more infomation >> We have negative unemployment effectively in US today: Rep. Issa - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #14 - Archie Patel - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #14 - Archie Patel - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

short & sweet | Q&A - S1 Ep2 - "Boys" | How did we meet? Is Sung Min a good/bad bf? - Duration: 4:39.

Hi! I'm Carolyn Yuen Marino, creator and writer of Sweet & Power.

Welcome to Episode 2 of Short & Sweet, where we do a quick debrief of the previous episode and answer any of your questions.

Today we have two guests with us.

We've got Yeji Sakoda who plays Yoona Kang,

and Burt Shin, who plays Sung Min, her boyfriend in Episode 2.

How do we all know each other?

Uh, we know each other from, uh,

the Hennessy days...

The real Hennessy days.

And we used to... we used to...

We used to study together actually. That's how we met. - That's right.

We were hardworking students.

Thanks so much for agreeing to play Sung Min, especially after Episode 1 "Proof".

In Episode 1, we find out that Cici and Noy don't like Sung Min very much...

probably because he sent a few choice pictures to some girls.

Never would have done that in real life.

So in Episode 2 "Boys", I wanted to delve into Yoona and Sung Min's relationship a little bit more.

How did you feel preparing for the role of Sung Min?

It was fun. I laughed a lot.

I had a lot of private laughing moments to myself in my car.

While you were running lines?

My brother would see me driving home, and I would be talking really animatedly in the car by myself.

And he was like, who are you talking to on the phone? - You were just getting into character.

Did you feel like Sung Min was a bad boyfriend?

No, I thought he was a good boyfriend actually.

A really good... he was a really good guy. I mean, he had his issues, he has vices... - Who doesn't?

He's got a lot of redeeming qualities though. - Exactly.

I think he really cares about Yoona, and obviously doesn't want her doing Addys... or anything else, I'm sure.

Why did you want Yoona and Sung Min to meet at a college party, like the way they did?

Well, it probably went down like that.

That's probably, yeah, based on actual events.

The footage was actual footage from 2008.

We dug it up from our Nokia phones or our Sidekicks or Motorolas. - Yeah, it was pretty impressive you guys found all that.

We're not that dated.

Well, I wanted all the college scenes to have the same feel.

You know, sometimes when you're in that party life, every night just feels the same,

or is all just a blur.

Yoona's also living it up in college right now, when she feels like her behaviors are acceptable.

So she's going out, getting with guys...

Plus, we wanted to shoot every scene with Yoona leading the guys up the stairs,

because we wanted to show that she was in control,

and that there is nothing wrong with women who are sexually empowered.

That's right.

Why do you think Yoona could be herself in college but not so much once she's graduated?

There is a line in the party scene where Cici talks to Noy about how

Papa Kang never lets Yoona out of the house.

She's just like really wanting freedom in college.

She has developed this pattern of hiding her habits,

and hiding a lot of secrets from her friends and family.

And now that she's in her mid-20s, she feels like it's really hard to break out of that pattern.

Plus, she just has like a lot on her plate.

She feels like she needs to be a forgiving girlfriend,

and she has to be a good friend to her friends like Cici.

Even though Yoona has a ton of work, she still goes out with Cici.

She's just a ride-or-die chick.

Yeah, she shows up. - She's a good friend.

It kind of compounds the stress on Yoona. It makes it so that she doesn't have anyone to talk to.

Plus, she's so busy and stressed out, and now she's resorting to some of these unhealthier habits.

Yeah, she's just kind of digging her own grave.

Plus, Cici is "hella judge-y".

We've all had these friends who are really protective of you,

and Cici is one of those friends to Yoona.

That makes it really difficult for Yoona to kind of be herself around her.

Cici has... - Good intentions, but is just a little intense.

Needs to lighten up.

Just a little bit.

Maybe take a hit.

"Maybe you should take another hit."

Cici really should.

Well, people keeping secrets is one of the themes of Episode 2.

We have Yoona lying to her friends, boyfriend, and really herself.

We've got Robin who's secretly engaged.

We have Noy who shared that she's had a longterm crush on Yoona.

We'll just have to see how this all unfolds in the rest of Sweet & Power.

Thank you for tuning in to Short & Sweet Episode 2!

We will have a Short & Sweet after every episode,

where we'll dive deeper into details.

You can also ask questions on our YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook page,

and we'll cover those questions in our next episode of Short & Sweet.

Bye!

I didn't say bye.

For more infomation >> short & sweet | Q&A - S1 Ep2 - "Boys" | How did we meet? Is Sung Min a good/bad bf? - Duration: 4:39.

-------------------------------------------

Baby #3 GENDER REVEAL! We're having a....... - Duration: 3:26.

It's a boy!

For more infomation >> Baby #3 GENDER REVEAL! We're having a....... - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Cher On President Donald Trump: I Don't Understand How We're America Anymore | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 4:00.

For more infomation >> Cher On President Donald Trump: I Don't Understand How We're America Anymore | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 4:00.

-------------------------------------------

4 Things We Learned as Chelsea Extended Their Unbeaten Run With a 3-1 Win Over Crystal Palace - Duration: 3:12.

Chelsea's stellar start to their 2018/19 campaign continued as they defeated Crystal Palace 3-1 on Sunday evening

Despite not being at their best, a brace from Alvaro Morata and a late strike from Pedro earned Chelsea all three points, bumping them up to second place in the Premier League - just two points behind league leaders Manchester City

As for Crystal Palace, they remain firmly in the bottom half of the table after the defeat and have only managed to amass eight points from their opening 11 matches

Here are four things we learned from the entertaining encounter.Ross Barkley has been enjoying somewhat of a renaissance so far this season, but things didn't exactly go to plan for the midfielder on Sunday

He looked off the pace right from the word go and was found guilty of giving the ball away far too often, particularly when Chelsea looked to be in threatening positions

As soon as he was replaced by Mateo Kovacic in the second half, Chelsea's play looked more dynamic and incisive and the Croatian looked much more comfortable with the ball at his feet

Barkley is a superb asset to have at Maurizio Sarri's disposal, but Kovacic should be the automatic starter in the midfield

Chelsea were finding no luck attacking down the left flank right up until Eden Hazard was introduced midway through the second half, which is testament to how well Aaron Wan-Bissaka performed at right-back for Crystal Palace

The youngster's positional awareness was sound and he looked completely unphased throughout the ninety minutes

He could have perhaps done a little better to stop the cross for Chelsea's third goal, but it has to remembered that he is still just 20 years old and that he has only made 20 first team appearances for the Eagles

Ever since Alvaro Morata joined Chelsea from Real Madrid last summer, he has found himself becoming the butt of far too many jokes for his poor form in front of goal

He didn't start the season brilliantly, but all of a sudden things seem to be clicking in front of goal for the Spaniard

He bagged a very impressive brace, bringing his goal tally to six in all competitions, which by all accounts is not a bad return

With Olivier Giroud out injured, now is the time for Morata to prove his doubters wrong and make the number nine spot his own

Ever since Eden Hazard joined Chelsea back in 2013, it was clear to see that the Belgian was a very special footballer

But this season he looks like a completely different animal all together. Maurizio Sarri probably made the right call by leaving him out from the start considering his fitness concerns, but bringing him off the bench midway through the second half proved to be a masterstroke

Hazard raised the tempo of the game, inspired the crowd and ultimately effected the outcome of the match

For more infomation >> 4 Things We Learned as Chelsea Extended Their Unbeaten Run With a 3-1 Win Over Crystal Palace - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

What If We Didn't Have Devices? - Duration: 4:09.

Devices, they're a crucial part of society and our daily lives.

We love them, we need them, and sometimes they can get a little bit addicting

But, what if we didn't have devices?

Our devices are like our parents we love them but we often abuse them.

Now, I'm not talking about beating up your phone, I'm talking more about how we take

our devices and phones for granted.

The average amount of total time spent by mobile users is 4 hours and 5 minutes per day.

Another study shows that U.S consumers spend even more time, specifically 5 hours a day!

We use our devices for entertainment, to connect with friends and colleagues, to stay informed,

to shop, and almost anything else you could imagine.

The reason that smartphones are so addictive is that when we get notifications on our phones,

we are compelled to pick it up because of dopamine triggers in our brains.

To device or to not device is the question.

In layman's terms, are we more progressive because we have devices or would we be more

progressive as a species if we didn't have devices?

As a society, we are getting more advanced, but as individuals, we may be gradually getting

Sibling: Jimmy you're late!

You're going to miss your test!

You're 20 minutes late Jimmy!

Alarm:RINGGSS!

Jimmy: Dad!

I'm leaving!

Dad: Bye buddy have a good day!

Jimmy: Dad!

I'm leaving!

As you can see in that film, that was waking up with and without devices.

In the first scene you can see that Jimmy would probably be woken up by a sibling or

parent if we didn't have any devices.

Waking up with devices tends to take us a lot longer unlike when we don't have devices

because we are distracted by social media on those devices.

This doesn't mean we are not productive because we have devices.

Because of devices, mankind has progressed faster in the last century than any other

time mostly to do with the advances in technology.

We definitely are better with our devices but it might be beneficial if we put our phones

or devices down every so often.

but wait theres more

For more infomation >> What If We Didn't Have Devices? - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #11 - Archie Patel - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #11 - Archie Patel - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

We asked Freddie Mercury and the Bohemian Rhapsody Movie. (Freddie Mercury'i sorduk.) - Duration: 10:10.

-Do you know who he is?

No. We don't know.

-Guess who he is.

Who is...

He looks like Ajdar (Turkish Singer)

-Does he look like Ajdar? -He looks like a crazy person.

He looks like a dancer.

-Do you know Queen band?

-.. a rock band. He is lead vocalist of it. Freddie Mercury.

-Do you have any opinion?

I know but, i dont remember his name.

Does he work in circus?

- Looks like that? -Yes.

Is he a dancer?

-Dont you know?

Musician.

-Musician? -Yes.

-I have no idea. -I guess he is musician.

-He could be an imposter. -Imposter? -Yes.

-Doesn't it remind you anyone?

But he resembles Tarkan. (Turkish Singer)

No we dont know.

I didn't like his style.

Maybe he can be a showman.

-Do you know Queen? -No.

-Queen? -No -Rock band?

-Lead vocalist. -Are you serious? -Yes.

Vallah, I dont remember.

-No we dont know. -Guess who he is.

Singer?

-Yes he is singer.

-Vallahi, I dont remember. -Guess who he is.

He could be a wrestler. Or something like boxer.

-Do you know Queen band? -No. -a rock band..

-He is lead vocalist of Queen. Freddie Mercury.

-Now a movie about him is playing in theatre. Bohemian Rapsody.

-I think you love him if you watch. -Yes, maybe.

-Thank you.

-Show must go on. Freddie Mercury. -They know. -Freddie Mercury.

-Do you speak Turkish? -A little bit.

-Do you know him? -Freddie M...

-Can you say again, please? -Freddie Mercury.

-Yes, true.

-We dont know. -Freddie Me... What was that?

-Mercury. -Yes, Freddie Mercury. -Bravo. You did.

-Do you like Queen?

-I dont listen too much.

-Now playing a movie in here about them, Bohemian Rapsody, you can watch it.

I will think later. Thank you.

-Freddie Mercury. -Freddie Mercury? -Yes.

-Bravo. Did you watch the movie?

I am planning to watch.

-Do you know him? -Who?

-Freddie Mercury. -Bravo for you.

-Did you watch the movie? -No, i did not. -You should watch it. Thank you.

Bohemian? Bohemian, name like this?

-The movie about him. -Yes.

-Bohemian Rapsody. Movie's name. Do you know his name?

-I dont know his name. -Did you watch the movie?

-Not yet. It was released a few days ago, isnt it? -Yes.

-and he is Freddie Mercury. You can watch movie in the theatre here.

Ok... But here is too expensive :)

I will not watch here.

-Thank you.

-Hi, do you know him?

Who was him?.. Queen..

I forgot the name.

-I remember why he died, but i dont remember his name now. -Freddie Mercury.

-Queen. -Yes. -Rock Music.

-You know too. You are super. Did you watch the movie?

-I didnt watch. -Bohemian Rapsody.

I didnt watch but, he is among my bests, my style is rock.

-It is playing in theatres now.

-What is the name? -Bohemian Rapsody. You should watch it. An impressive movie about his life and the Queen..

Definitely, i will watch. Everybody should do. Thank you.

-Can we ask you?

-Who is he? You know? -No.

-Queen? -No.

-Ok then.

-Who is he? Do you know?

No, but looks like a rock star.

..but is he Ajdar? (Turkish Singer)

-Do you think, he looks like Ajdar? -Yes, i do. Who is he?

-The lead vocalist of Queen Band. Freddie Mercury. -Ayy, yess.

-But he looks like. -Yes. Now the movie is playing.

-Bohemian Rapsody. About him.

I didnt remember because the picture is not clear.

Freddie Mercury. Ok.

-You. Do you know who is he?

-No. -I think you know.

No.

-Dont you know?

-Freddie Mercury.

-Who is he, do you know?

-Dont you know? Why?

-Probably, they think he is something bad.

-Hey guys, i will ask something. Who is he, do you know?

-Unfortunately. -Dont you know? -No.

-Guess, what can be his job? -Something like dancer?

-Do you know the band Queen? -No.

-rock band? -No. -He is the vocalist of Queen. Freddie Mercury.

-Who is he, you know?

I didnt remember but his armpit is bad.

-He says his armpit is bad.

-Girls, who is he?

-Guys, who is he, you know?

-Unfortunately. -Do you know Queen?

-Queen.. I heard it. -Rock band. -Yes.

-Vocalist of it.

-What will you think if i havent said who he was? -Nothing.

-Guys, do you want to answer? It is very simple.

-Do you? -No.

-Why? -What will you ask?

-I'll ask that you know him or not. What is his job?

-Musician. -You? Do you know?

-I dont know but, probably he is dancer.

-Vocalist of Queen. -I know the band, but..

-Freddie Mercury. There is movie about him now playing in theatre. You can watch.

-I'm sure, you will like him after the movie.

What is this, ya.

-Who is he, do you know him?

-No, i dont. -You?

-Do you know him? -My eyes cant see. Bring it closer, please.

-No, i dont. -He has a good moustache.

-What is jhis job, do you think?

I dont know but he can be musician.

-To whom does he look like? -I dont know.

-You?

I am thinking now.

Can i take it?

I dont want to blow smoke

I think he is musican.

I cant say anything about him.

He doesnt remind me anybody.

Can you give any hint?

-I can sing his song.

-(singing)

Yes we have heard the song before.

-(singing)

I remember something but not exactly.

-Lead vocalist of Queen. Freddie Mercury.

-Now there is a movie about him, is playing in theatre

-Yes

-We are advertising it for free.

-We love him and we make people to watch the movie.

-We make it our own.

-It's just for culture and art.

-Do you want to ask you? do you know him? -I dont want to know. -

-Which job does he work for?

-Singer? -Yes, a singer.

(he is speaking in Turkish)

-You speak Turkish? -Yes, sure.

-ahah I was speaking in English. -We dont know him. who is he?

-Freddie Mercury from Queen.

-Queen, rock band. Dont you know? -Rock?

-But you listen rap. Right?

-Yes, rap. We are like this. Yo yo yo.

-You are super. -Yes we are like this. We dont care rock music.

-Do you know the song, we will rock you?

-Does he sing this song? -Yes. -I dont know.

-We are the champions etc...

-Unfortunately, we dont know. -We listen rap.

-For example, you can ask us Ezhel (Turkish rap singer)

-Thank you.

-You know him? -Farrokh Bulsara

-Ohhh. Finally, we are in the correct place now.

-Freddie Mercury. Lead vocalist of Queen. -Did you watch the movie?

-I didnt watch, was it realesed? -Yes, it is playing now.

-Bohemian Rapsody. You should definitely watch it. -Yes, i will.

-You like him too much, dont you? -I am his fan.

Thank you so much.

For more infomation >> We asked Freddie Mercury and the Bohemian Rhapsody Movie. (Freddie Mercury'i sorduk.) - Duration: 10:10.

-------------------------------------------

الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #13 - Archie Patel - Duration: 0:36.

For more infomation >> الدببة الثلاثة We bare bears حالة طارئة #13 - Archie Patel - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

10 things we have learned from social media | #BattleCry s1e9 - Duration: 6:25.

Last week we talked about you and me; this week let's talk about us!

(selah – musical break)

Well, hello brothers and sisters!

Welcome to Mission: Zer0!

If this is your first time here: my name is Shawn, and this is Battle Cry, the show where

we give you a motivational theme that can carry you through a more positive week!

What we talked about last week was really all about self-image, and improving and sustaining

and edifying yourself, but this week I think we need to talk about interpersonal relationships.

And the way I want to do that is to talk about 10 things that we have learned through the

glory of social media.

Right off the top, I think the biggest thing that social media has taught us is how to

corrupt our priorities.

[the obsessive]: OMG!

Shawn Dawson has posted a new video!

Y'all can just wait!

[the vain]: Look at this dent!

This will just be PERFECT for my grid!

The things that we find so important nowadays are kind of ridiculous.

But, for that, I will also say that the second thing social media has taught us is what priorities

really matter.

We have gotten a global perspective and really felt the ability to downplay the drama in

our own lives; to really take a look, and attack, the problems that afflict the whole

world.

[Todd Phillips]: Number one, the first question, was: what's the greatest need in the world?

We realized it was water.

[people screaming and waves crashing]

Another clear victim of social media is our perspective.

I talk a lot about perspective, but is there anything, more than social media, that has

narrowed our focus, and narrowed our focus, and corrupted the ability to see what's

going on around us?

Number 4, the other side of that coin, is that social media has given us new perspectives.

This global reach has given us the ability to see how similar we are.

For all our diversity and all our cultural differences, we are SO the same people inside.

(selah – musical break)

The fifth thing that social media has taught us is how to destroy relationships.

[hardcore conservative]: Whatever, little snowflake!

Go cry on your participation trophy!

It is just SO easy for us to fall into the pit of judgement, and hate, and careless words.

But, you know?

The sixth thing that social media has taught us is how to identify the relationships that

really matter.

The people that will really support you, the people that will really cheer you on and build

you up.

(selah – musical break)

The seventh thing that social media has taught us all is how to exploit people.

But by that same token, the eighth thing that social media has taught us is what true humanity

is.

The ninth thing that social media has taught us all is how to cave to the flesh.

(selah – musical break)

But, you know?

The tenth thing that social media has taught us all could be the most important: exactly

what God looks like.

There are so many, SO MANY, professions of Love, and connectedness, and togetherness

in the diversity of social media that all shows the face of God, that all cries out

to the Creator: WE LOVE YOU!

(selah – musical break)

Well, well, well…

I'm sorry, I had to take the joke: there's a well out here!

Anyway, to wrap this: the power of social media is staggering, but all it's really

done is expose for us, very clearly, the duality of humanity.

We can use it or good or we can use it for evil.

But the question that you and I have to ask ourselves every time we post, every time we

respond to a post, every time we create something: is this building someone up or tearing someone

down?

Is this bringing people closer together, or driving them further apart?

Does this create more "us"es or does this create more "them"s?

Carry this with you this week; whatever piece of this, whatever item or items ring to you

in this, grab on to those and make a concerted effort to do better, to be more to celebrate

the diversity of humanity more, to build people up more, to build yourself up more.

And use it, use it as always, to be the you-iest you you can possibly be.

And may God pour out the blessings of good judgement, and perspective, and prioritization

to you to do what really matters, to focus on what really matters.

I Love you SO, so much.

Peace out!