free xbox live gold or how to get free xbox codes and free xbox codes live New!!!
-------------------------------------------
How People Buy YouTube Views | Legal or illegal ? - Duration: 10:11.
subscribe
to
brown guy channel
by clicking
the subscribe button
click
the bell button
to turn the notifications
on
-------------------------------------------
How To Insulate Stone Foundation Walls | Spray Foam Or Foam Board | Crawl Space Encapsulation - Duration: 2:19.
Hey, Michael Church, CrawlSpaceNinja.com, and we got a great question from Greg in Virginia,
he's looking to do a D.I.Y. project on his crawl space, and he's got a stone wall foundation
and he wants to know how to insulate it.
Stay tuned.
Greg, we come across stone walls and even uneven brick, and even uneven block walls
from time to time.
And if you're trying to put a piece of foam board on these walls, number one, if it's
uneven, it's not gonna even stick properly, but number two, if you go to shoot a hilty
nail in there, or a masonry screw, or something like that, you could actually damage the foundation.
What we have found to do, is that we use a two component, close cell spray foam to insulate
the wall.
So, you take the plastic of the wall, maybe 10 to 12 inches, and then you take a two component
spray foam and you spray the plastic to the wall and then go up a little higher up the
wall, okay?
So, this way the two component spray foam, which is a close cell, is also a vapor barrier,
and it will join the plastic that you've already laid on the ground, all right?
So, that's one way that you can do it, it's probably the most effective and easiest way
that we have found to do it.
Now, what you don't want to do, is you don't want to go back and forth with spray foam.
Spray foam expands, so you spray it, you let it expand, you let it harden, and then you
spray it again, okay?
So, there's a way to do it, so if you can find some videos online about how to apply
spray foam, that would be probably a great next step for you.
Typically, you would get two component spray foams at either a local box store, like Home
Depot, or Lowe's or some place like that.
So, that was a great question from Virginia, we thank you for all of your questions, and
comments, and likes down below, we hope you liked this video.
We hope you make it a happy and blessed day, we'll see you later.
-------------------------------------------
how do mobile phone produce electromagnetic wave or radio wave in hindi - Duration: 2:46.
For more infomation >> how do mobile phone produce electromagnetic wave or radio wave in hindi - Duration: 2:46. -------------------------------------------
#аквариум Добро пожаловать! Или посторонним вход Разрешён! 😉Welcome! Or unauthorized entry is allow - Duration: 2:55.
For more infomation >> #аквариум Добро пожаловать! Или посторонним вход Разрешён! 😉Welcome! Or unauthorized entry is allow - Duration: 2:55. -------------------------------------------
Republicans Can't Decide If Democrats Are Delicate Snowflakes Or Violent Criminals - Duration: 4:29.
Donald Trump's got a new talking point out there right now.
Jobs not mobs, and he's been testing that out ahead of the midterms here because he
says the Republicans are the party of jobs, Democrats the party of mobs.
Right now, we have right wing media outlets and Republican politicians telling us that
Democrats are horrible, violent, angry people who are going to come beat you up, mow you
down, bang on your business' doors, bang on the doors of the Supreme Court.
They're going to hurt you, basically, because Democrats are so damn dangerous.
These are the same Democrats who just, maybe a month ago, were delicate little snowflakes
that needed their own safe space because the world was just so scary to them.
But now, we've all turned into superheros that are out there just waiting to pound the
crap out of any Republican we happen to come across while walking down the street.
My question is this.
Which is it, Republicans?
Are we whiny little snowflakes that need to be protected from everything the world has
to offer?
Or, are we these violent hulk-like creatures just waiting for the chance to smash in the
head of a Republican?
Because, you're talking points at this point, like most times, actually conflict with one
another.
We can't be both snowflakes and violent mobs.
Do you see how those two don't reconcile together?
What's really terrifying to you Republicans is the fact that people in this country are
now willing to stand up to you.
Hell, they're even standing up to some Democrats they don't like because too often they vote
in the interests of corporations instead of the American public.
But, Republicans are terrified.
They're the sad little snowflakes who don't want to be bothered, the people who need a
safe space, because they can't even go sit and eat an apple pie in a restaurant without
somebody yelling at them, because all the Republican tried to do was take away their
health care.
You know, like any decent American would do, and now this person's saying I'm mean.
I can't finish my meal now.
Box that up, I'll take it home.
That's not how it works.
Democrats are not angry, violent mobs.
Democrats are not delicate little snowflakes.
Democrats, progressives, liberals, whatever the hell you want to call them, they're people
who are pissed off right now, and they're going to make sure you know it.
They're going to confront you when you try to pass policies that are going to harm American
citizens.
They're going to confront you when you throw children in cages because they're a different
nationality than us.
They're going to confront you when you put a man accused, by multiple women, of sexual
assault on the U.S. Supreme Court.
You're going to have to answer for those things.
If you won't answer while sitting in a restaurant trying to eat a cheeseburger, then you're
damn sure going to answer this year in the mid-terms.
If you're one of the lucky few that's not up for re-election, then you'll answer in
the next election, because they're not forgetting.
I don't always approve of some of the tactics, banging on the U.S. Supreme Court door.
That was unnecessary.
That wasn't going to change anything.
But, making these people uncomfortable, confronting them on the street, in a restaurant, in the
airport, they need that.
They need to understand that people aren't happy.
These talking points that Republicans and Breitbart and Daily Caller and all these other
sites that low information voters read, telling us the Democrats are violent criminals.
Nobody's buying into that except for the people who will vote red no matter what.
The average person out there, the independent voters, they see what's going on.
They understand the anger, and they're not buying into these Republican talking points
that a Democrat's going to sneak up behind them and slit their throat one day.
That's only the Republicans who live in constant fear of any evil Democrats lurking out there,
which doesn't even actually exist.
Democrats want answers, and the only people who can give them those answers are the people
in office passing these horrible policies.
If they can't handle that, then maybe it's time that they find a new job.
-------------------------------------------
For Better or Worse: Uncharted 4's Best Minute | Game Score Fanfare - Duration: 12:50.
The Uncharted series is king of the set-piece.
The games are built around these exhilarating, impeccably choreographed scenes, each one
a new way for Nathan Drake to cling to falling objects, moving vehicles and his life.
They are among the most memorable moments in all of video games, but my personal favourite
Uncharted moment is not one of these grand spectacles.
The one part that I remember most is a quiet, single minute of driving through the Madagascan
wilderness in Chapter 17 of Uncharted 4.
A melancholic moment of reflection while a musical cue plays out called For Better or
Worse.
This scene particularly sticks in my mind because it does something quite rare for a
modern AAA video game.
It pulls back everything in order make space for its score to speak.
Before we talk about how it does this though, we should know what it is that the music is
saying.
In A Thief's End, Nate has retired from his adventurer's lifestyle and settled down
with his now-wife Elena.
He lives a normal life and keeps a normal job, promising that his globe-trotting, treasure-hunting
days are over.
But of course the lure of adventure beckons him once more, this time in the form of his
long-lost brother Sam who, in typical Drake form, has found himself in some trouble which
can only be solved by chasing hidden treasure.
So before running off with Sam to the Scottish Highlands in search of antique pirate booty,
Nate calls Elena up and instead tells her that he's off to Malaysia for a work-trip.
This scene is scored by a violin playing a somber version of Nate's famous musical
theme, which is accompanied by a simple piano ostinato.
That piano melody is basically just four ascending notes in the key of E-minor.
This is the first time that we hear this musical phrase, the second being when Nate's journey
unexpectedly takes him to Madagascar and he follows-up on the lie.
I
love the way it creeps in right at the end there, similar to how guilt does after being
dishonest.
This reinforces that melodic idea as a leitmotif representing the lie.
Considering it doesn't play in other scenes such as the initial set-up of Nate and Elena's
home life, I don't really see it being a general theme representing them as a couple.
When Elena inevitably cottons on and flies out to Madagascar to catch Nate in the lie,
we hear that motif for a third time, and again it's towards the end of their confrontation.
It plays for longer and more prominently here than it has previously, now that the lie has
been uncovered and blown up, so by this point the player should have made a connection between
the motif and the lie, even if it is subconsciously.
After this scene the motif doesn't appear for a while, not until Elena finds Nate injured
and reveals how close he was to losing her.
This quick re-introduction serves as a little reminder of the situation, of them and of
the melody, and it's soon followed up by finally, my favourite scene.
During an elevator ride the couple have a brief conversation, with Elena telling Nate
that he should've been honest with her so they could work out the problem together.
For once the charismatic Nathan Drake is at a loss for words.
When you get to the top, you gain control of the car and drive off, but there's something
different.
The sound of the car engine is muffled and the couple sit in silent contemplation, pulling
your focus toward the music - a fully fleshed-out theme based around the lie leitmotif, which
plays out for an entire minute completely uninterrupted.
This creates a space for you to dwell on the situation and share in the emotions of the
characters.
Because the game took the time to build a link between the lie and this piano motif,
the music is able to represent the unspoken thoughts on the characters' minds and it
allows you to enter their same headspace.
You can feel the tension between Nate and Elena, the guilt and the disappointment.
It's obvious that this section of the game was designed to encourage this introspective
mood.
The simple road you follow carefully winds through the jungle and while the scenery is
no-doubt beautiful, there are no incredible vistas that catch your eye, or secondary paths
with hidden collectables to distract you.
As someone who likes to scour every corner of the map that I can, during this section
I didn't stray from the road once, or stop and leave the car at all.
This is also a rare instance for a Naughty Dog game in which the characters shut up for
more than 20 seconds - in fact they go a whole minute without any funny quip, short story
or subtle guidance that would remove you from that intended frame of mind.
The very moment the music cue finishes, you get an info dump from Sully and hit a rocky
shicane in the road.
This scene wouldn't work nearly as well if it weren't for the other elements of
the game fading away to let the music take control.
You can tell because it was actually only implemented on the day one patch: if you play
straight from the disc and don't update the game, the car engine is at a normal volume
and the moment doesn't hit quite as hard.
And this actually highlights a trend in modern AAA games that I'm not in love with - very
rarely do they give their musical scores the opportunity to do their job.
Music was once the primary auditory component of a video game - there was almost always
a constant loop of music playing in the background and it didn't have much else to compete
with in the audio mix, outside of the occasional sound-effects.
It played a vital role in delivering the intended emotion and atmosphere of the game, and that's
another part of the reason why we remember the old soundtracks so fondly.
But as games grew more complex, music became less important to them.
The audio space had to make room for voice-acting, which replaced music as the primary emotive
performance in the game.
As graphics improved and environments became more detailed, less imagination was required
to understand where you were.
Environmental noises were needed to match the detail shown on screen and sell the atmosphere
in a much more immersive way.
The existence of any musical score runs the risk of obscuring that ambience.
As a result of these developments, I feel that music can often be ignored or forgotten
about nowadays as the powerful storytelling tool that it is.
So to pull back the environmental sounds and voice-acting and let the music dominate is
actually kind of a brave choice to make in 2016.
It's putting faith in the score, trusting not only that it won't break immersion or
remove the audience from the moment, but also that it's able to achieve the same atmosphere
as environmental ambience, the same emotional punch as the actors' performance, and tell
the same story as scripted dialogue.
And I think For Better or Worse is a success on all these fronts.
The developers trusted the music with the space to work, and it turned what was potentially
a forgettable minute of nothing much into one of the most poignant and memorable moments
in the entire series.
But this isn't the final time we hear that leitmotif.
A little bit later you briefly hear a variation of it, when Elena accepts Nate's apology.
Afterwards it appears in a quick scene with the couple joking around, seemingly suggesting
that they are moving on and returning to normality.
And then finally it plays twice during the ending, once when they're talking about
their inability to lead a normal life, but more interestingly right here.
You might've noticed that it sounds a little different this time though.
The second note of the phrase, G, is shifted up just a semitone to G#, which actually changes
the piece from an E-minor to an E-major.
This gives the motif a positive spin, providing a sense of happiness and hope for the couple's
future.
But what's interesting to me is that it's using the same leitmotif that is so strongly
associated with Nate's lie.
It suggests that while the couple have forgiven and moved past it, they have not forgotten.
That that moment is ingrained in their relationship now.
I am reminded of the Japanese practice of Kintsugi, in which broken pottery is repaired
using gold.
The philosophy behind this art is that the breakage is an important part of the object's
history, that scars of the past should be remembered and embraced rather than hidden
and forgotten about.
Using the leitmotif in a major key at this moment recognises that Nate's lie, though
wrong, was an important part of the couple's shared history together.
It's not that their relationship exists in spite of it, but rather was shaped and
potentially even strengthened as a result of it.
Something better came out of their worst.
Thanks for watching!
A quick announcement: Game Score Fanfare finally has an official Discord server!
Everyone is invited to join using this code, or you can just click the link in the video's
description box.
If you pledge $1 or more per video on Patreon, you also get access to exclusive Discord channels
with dedicated spaces for discussing video games, music and video game music.
I hope to see you there and look forward to getting to know you a little better!
-------------------------------------------
The Perfect Guy or The Perfect Cheater? (Full Episode) | Couples Court - Duration: 17:03.
This is Couples Court With The Cutlers.
This is the case of Briggs v. Maxwell.
You've been dating one year, is that correct?
Yes, Your Honor.
Yes, Your Honor.
And why did you bring your boyfriend here?
I brought him here
because I need someone to help me crack this case on whether he is the...
Perfect guy or the perfect cheater.
JUDGE DANA: And, Mr. Maxwell,
why are you here?
JAMAL MAXWELL: Uh, I wanna
prove to her that I'm not lying,
that I'm not a cheater.
And give her assurance, you know,
so that way we could just...
Move forward.
But you've only been together a year.
If it ain't good the first year,
I'm kind of concerned about
what it looks like two years from now.
JUDGE KEITH: Yeah.
MODESTY BRIGGS: I need to find out
if he's telling the truth.
He's very convincing.
Like, he acts like
nothing is happening. You ask him a question,
he knows nothing about it,
even though everything points to him knowing.
If I find out today that he's lying,
that's it. I'm done.
JUDGE DANA: All right. So what is on the line here
is your relationship.
Either you're in,
or you out.
It's either we right, or we not.
JUDGE DANA: And you understand that if it comes back
that you have cheated,
she's gone.
That's what she says, yeah.
(AUDIENCE GROANS)
JUDGE DANA: I know what she said.
I asked you did you understand?
BRIGGS: You see what I'm talking about?
You see how he answers questions?
No, I get it. I mean, I get what she's saying, you know.
JUDGE DANA: Well, Ms. Briggs, here's what I want to know.
How did you all become a couple?
Tell me about how you met.
I met him at a friend's gathering.
And I noticed him.
He had a nice little swag, or whatever.
He came over, we talked,
and one thing went to another.
We went out.
He used to pay me, like, compliments.
I mean, just the way he carried himself,
that's why I said, like, he knows what to do.
So, he just made me believe
that chivalry wasn't dead.
JUDGE KEITH: All right, Mr. Maxwell,
what do you remember about the first time you saw her?
I mean, it's exactly like what she said.
We met, like, through... (CLEARS THROAT) Through a mutual friend.
And when I seen her, I mean, she's beautiful.
I mean, just look at her. She's very beautiful.
You were a little reluctant to, you know, step to her?
MAXWELL: No, not at all.
I'm not that... I'm not reluctant to step to any female.
Look at this.
Oh, okay.
(AUDIENCE LAUGHING)
Of course!
MAXWELL: But it's more so, like, look at her,
I need to have her in my life,
so I had to step to her.
JUDGE DANA: Aah.
After, like, getting to talk to her
and getting to know her...
I mean, she's a really humble spirit.
Wow.
MAXWELL: She put a lot of people in front of her.
Um, and that's just, like, some of the qualities
that I really admire about her.
On our first date, like, he kind of planned this whole thing.
We went and we had dinner.
Um, and even during the dinner,
he was telling me how...
Like, I was wifey material and...
He's saying all the right things, and...
Right, right.
On the first date?
So, I could... You know, I was into that.
And then afterwards, we went to this reggae club.
And, you know, I'm, like, dancin',
doin' all this stuff, like...
Showin' him my Beyonce or whatever.
And he just...
(AUDIENCE LAUGHING)
He's just, like... Hey!
He is just, like, doin' his little two-step the whole time.
But, I mean, it was all good.
It was a nice little time,
and, I mean, that's really where we started vibing and...
Okay, so she said on the first date,
you popped out with, "You wifey material"?
That's strong, man!
(CHUCKLES) No, no, I mean, you don't understand, like,
she looks amazing, right?
JUDGE DANA: Absolutely.
MAXWELL: Standing next to me, I look even better...
Amen!
MAXWELL: Just having a woman like this next to you?
See? There you go!
Dude, I feel you.
MAXWELL: You know how good he look
just because you next to him?
Yeah!
I had to have her.
So, you know, she said it was a nice night out. Man, that night
was more than just a nice night.
It was, like... It was a magical night.
That's how I remember it.
JUDGE DANA: Oh!
AUDIENCE: Aww.
MAXWELL: I just knew at that moment, like...
All right, I gotta have this woman even more, so...
JUDGE KEITH: Okay, so, I mean...
JUDGE DANA: But when you...
Oh, I'm sorry, love.
Go ahead. Go ahead.
No, go ahead, go ahead.
Okay.
I see the smiles on your faces...
Mmm-hmm.
...as you talk about the past,
but when we opened this case,
you looked mad and you looked mad.
So I wanna know
what brought us to where we're standing here today.
I have suspected that he has been cheating.
He's done some things that has made me feel that way.
And it started by, um, last July.
We went to a club and afterwards,
everyone decided to go back
to his house. When everybody got there,
and my friend told me, she was like,
"Oh, you need to go check on Mr. Maxwell."
So I went into the room,
and there's this girl sitting on his bed.
And I'm like, "Is he in the bathroom?"
And so she was like, "Yeah, he's in the bathroom."
So I knock on the bathroom door,
and it took him a minute, he opened the door,
and, you know, I'm just trying to be, like, a nice girl
and just see if my man is okay,
and so, we both come out the room.
Me and him.
JUDGE DANA: Okay.
The girl is still in the room.
You found a woman sitting on his bed.
BRIGGS: Yes, like, by the headboard.
JUDGE KEITH: Is she dressed? Is she not dressed?
Is she partially dressed?
Yes, she's fully dressed.
I mean, it was a bunch of people at my house.
I mean, some girls there, they did like me.
There was some that liked me.
But, I wasn't obligated to...
But we need to know about the girl in the bed.
Right.
JUDGE DANA: Did she like you?
She liked me, too.
JUDGE DANA: Okay.
She did. I mean...
How did she end up on your bed?
She walked in there.
Where were you? Were you in the room...
MAXWELL: I was in the bathroom.
Okay, so you... Did you know
she was in the bedroom?
No, I didn't.
JUDGE KEITH: All right.
That wasn't the bad part, though.
So, we're in the kitchen, and this girl,
she says this comment like, "You're doing too much."
What did she mean by that?
BRIGGS: Exactly!
That's where all of this starts, okay?
So, I'm asking the girl, like,
what does she... You know, "Are you talking to me?
"Are you talking to him? Who are you talking to?
"Because I don't even know... Like, how are you in our business?"
Right!
BRIGGS: And I literally asked her
I was, like, "Are you sleeping with him?"
JUDGE KEITH: Oh, you just went straight there.
And she was like, "No."
I look him dead in his face,
and I said, "Why is she saying this?"
And I said back...
And he said,
BOTH: "I don't know."
"I don't know why she's saying this."
JUDGE DANA: Okay, but what does that mean?
"You doing too much."
What were you doing?
BRIGGS: Exactly!
What were you doing?
BRIGGS: Long story short,
she never explained that night, why she said that.
He never explained that night why she said that.
That other girl was making it seem like
I was in a relationship with the girl that was in my bed and I wasn't.
I mean, not at all.
But she was making it seem like, "Oh.
"You supposed to be with her,"
or, "He's supposed to be with her."
But I didn't get that news!
All right, so is this the only incident that you have?
BRIGGS: No, um...
He ended giving me his password to his phone.
I gave him my password to my phone,
so after that, it was cool. It was, like, back to how it was.
JUDGE DANA: 'Cause you're figuring if he's giving me the password
to his phone, he's an open book.
BRIGGS: Yes, yes, yes.
Then, all of a sudden, again, like...
Just randomly, I would walk in a room,
and he would clearly be on his phone texting.
And when he'd see me walk in, he'd just put it down.
Is it possible he was just texting his friends and just,
when he came in he wanted to turn his attention to you?
MAXWELL: Here's my thing with the phone, all right?
One, it's my phone.
All right.
MAXWELL: Right?
I pay the bill on this phone.
And if I wanna text somebody on it,
I text somebody on it.
If I wanna call somebody on it, I'll call somebody on it.
Was there anything in the phone that she shouldn't find?
No, there's nothing in the phone at all! She got
the password, she ain't gonna find nothing in my phone!
Ha!
Um, question.
How long have you guys been married?
Twenty-eight years.
We've been married 28 years.
MAXWELL: 28 years you've been married, right?
Yeah.
And I'm quite sure, those 28 years,
you ain't been happy the whole 28 years, right?
JUDGE DANA: Oh, I have been.
(AUDIENCE LAUGHS)
MAXWELL: Yeah, okay, right.
(MAXWELL STUTTERING)
The whole...
I'm teasing.
MAXWELL: So, the goal
to a successful marriage is to try to stay happy, right?
So why would you look for something to be unhappy?
JUDGE KEITH: So you're not questioning why she's looking
in your phone, you're questioning why
she's looking for something, anything!
MAXWELL: She don't wanna be happy!
That is one situation.
Another situation...
JUDGE DANA: All right.
I spent the night over there and it must have been about 2:00 a.m.
I see this light from the wall blinking up.
He's laid over the bed, like...
Looking on his phone.
Like, his head is clearly off of the bed.
So I'm like, I try to get to see what he was doing.
And he instantly, like, turned it down
so I can't see the light anymore.
But, I mean, I didn't say anything,
I just acted like I was just turning,
you know, like, in my sleep or whatever.
Right.
So a couple of days later,
I went in the phone and I opened the phone.
The password still worked.
And I see all these social media, like, different apps.
Okay.
And so, I tried to open the apps,
and he had it logged off.
So I don't know his username or passwords
to these social media apps.
But I have a friend that knows everything about social media.
JUDGE DANA: Okay.
BRIGGS: So she goes on there,
and less than 30 minutes...
MAXWELL: See, again,
we looking to be unhappy.
...she finds a profile of his
on a dating site.
AUDIENCE: Oh!
BRIGGS: And I have
the screenshot that she sent.
If I could submit it.
JUDGE DANA: Ron,
would you please pick that up for us?
RON: Yes, Your Honor.
Thank you, ma'am.
Oh, boy.
It says Max.
MAXWELL: Right.
JUDGE DANA: And do you go by "Max" at times?
MAXWELL: Yup.
JUDGE KEITH: Is that you?
That's me.
JUDGE DANA: Okay. Age 31.
MAXWELL: See? There we go, right there, I'm not 31.
It's old! That stuff is old.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
This looks very similar to some of the pictures
we've been flashing up of you all.
Your couple pictures.
AUDIENCE: Ooh!
It's me.
JUDGE DANA: This is you on your dating profile, right?
Mmm-hmm.
Can you put up one of the pictures
that you submitted to the court?
MAXWELL: Mmm-hmm.
JUDGE DANA: That's you two together, right?
BRIGGS: Look at the glasses, same.
MAXWELL: Them ain't the same glasses. They're both Gucci shades,
but they ain't the same one.
Oh, Jesus!
Look at 'em, go into close-up!
(INDISTINCT ARGUING)
...help us.
I got more than one pair of Gucci shades.
Look at the Gucci frame up here and then look on the side.
Go closer. Y'all ain't about to catch me up on that.
Okay.
But is that the same hat?
(AUDIENCE GROANS)
MAXWELL: Hey, you know how many hats I got?
JUDGE DANA: I don't know how many,
but I'm asking you about this hat.
Uh, no, it can't be.
Well, why still have it up all these years?
I don't have it up! They got it up! (STUTTERS)
When was the last time you used this dating profile?
I don't use it.
So, it's just out there?
MAXWELL: I guess so.
This guy right here,
he knows what he's doing.
He knows what he's doing.
JUDGE KEITH: All right. Mr. Maxwell
and Ms. Briggs, at this time,
the court would like to call cyber security expert,
Gregory Evans.
Ron, would you please escort
Mr. Evans into the court room?
GREGORY: Hello, Your Honors.
JUDGE DANA: Hello, how are you, Mr. Evans?
JUDGE KEITH: Good to see you.
GREGORY: Doin' great, yourselves?
JUDGE KEITH: All right.
GREGORY: All right.
Mr. Evans, you had access to
Mr. Maxwell's phone, is that correct?
Yes.
JUDGE KEITH: And what kind of things can you get from phones?
Oh, we can get text messages,
emails, videos, pictures.
Anything that's ever been on a phone can be retrieved.
Even if it's deleted?
Even if it's deleted.
That's where forensics comes in.
JUDGE DANA: What did you uncover, Mr. Evans?
If you go through the homepage on the iPhone,
and use your thumb and swipe down,
it shows the apps you use the most on there.
Okay.
That's universal.
On his, it showed
that he uses Mail, Notes,
Tinder, and a new one I never heard of, SoulSwipe.
SoulSwipe. Wow.
JUDGE DANA: What is SoulSwipe?
GREGORY: (STUTTERS) Their definition,
and here's the evidence for that, Your Honor.
Oh, thank you.
The definition is...
(BRIGGS CHUCKLES)
"SoulSwipe: Black Dating."
Whoa.
Mr. Maxwell, are you a participating member
in SoulSwipe?
JUDGE DANA: Or Tinder?
No, I'm not.
JUDGE DANA: Can you explain why they come up
as one of your top four?
MAXWELL: 'Cause he probably put it
on there, I didn't do that.
(AUDIENCE GROANS)
BRIGGS: Exactly!
GREGORY: Okay, so...
(CHUCKLES) We use forensics.
And we use forensic software.
See, computers don't lie.
It shows his device name,
his EMI name, the serial number to his phone,
the firmware in his phone.
So we were able to look at all the apps that was on his phone.
Okay.
So, and we're also able to see apps that were also deleted.
But these ones were not deleted,
and it still showed
that these were the top two on his phone.
If we were to add these apps, like he's claiming,
we would have needed his iCloud password to go into the Apple store
to download 'em.
Well, what was funny was is when I was going through his phone,
I had just received it from the court,
I did ask for the iCloud username and password.
He said he couldn't find the iCloud username and password, he forgot it.
So he gave us five passwords, none of them worked.
So I'm just looking through the phone
and I'm looking through his notes.
Now, an hour before he turned in the phone,
he had just put a brand new note in
of a restaurant, a popular restaurant here.
Right? I got out of that note, went back into
another note, came back out...
That note was deleted.
I was like, "What happened to that note?"
One of my team member says,
"Well, when I went in there to talk to him, it looked like
"he was logged in to his iCloud account."
And he might have been deleting... I just know one thing.
That note was there.
And then it wasn't there.
I had one note that said the name of a restaurant
because I wanted to go eat
at a restaurant and somebody told me about it.
I put the note in there to remember the name of the restaurant.
But Mr. Evans, if you had the phone,
how else could it have been deleted?
Where's the guilt in that?
By being logged in to the iCloud account
using the password he said he couldn't remember.
How can I log in if you got my phone?
Can you log in from another device?
Yeah, you can log in from anything, you just go to iCloud.com,
and just log in with your email address and your password,
to your iCloud account.
Mr. Maxwell?
Did you delete that information from the phone?
No. Everything that he said is hearsay, speculation
of what anybody could do.
No, the only person who gets to make that decision is me.
And him.
Mr. Cutler's question to you was,
did you delete it?
MAXWELL: No.
No, I did not.
It's a restaurant, like, why would I delete a restaurant?
JUDGE DANA: We don't know.
I don't either.
I, I mean, this is what I deal with all the time.
Every time we have a situation,
he's always backpedaling,
you know, skating around,
what it really is when all the proof is right there.
All right, Ms. Briggs, we're gonna get you
some additional information, because we had Mr. Maxwell
to sit down with a certified polygraph examiner.
Are you ready for the results?
Yes, Your Honor.
(AUDIENCE APPLAUDS)
Thank you, sir.
Here you go, love.
Mr. Maxwell, you were asked,
prior to July 2016,
"Had you had sex with the woman who was sitting on your bed during your party?"
And you answered, "No."
The lie detector determined that you were being...
Deceptive.
Oh!
(AUDIENCE GROANS)
What's going through your mind?
Just the fact, like, you act like
you did not know what was going on! Nothing!
I did not know her,
until after that.
BRIGGS: (SIGHS) Oh, my God.
What did she have a trash bag on? Like, really.
JUDGE KEITH: All right, well,
Ms. Briggs and Mr. Maxwell, we have a second question.
Mr. Maxwell, you were asked,
"Have you had any sexual intercourse with other women
"while dating Ms. Briggs?"
And you answered, "No."
The lie detector determined...
That you were being...
Deceptive.
Okay.
MAXWELL: No, I'm telling the truth.
BRIGGS: We're done.
We're done.
JUDGE DANA: Our court offers resources to you
so you can figure out how to move positively forward.
JUDGE KEITH: Because you need to change your ways,
so that neither one of you is cheated
out of an opportunity for a great relationship.
Court is adjourned.
(AUDIENCE CHEERS AND APPLAUDS)
-------------------------------------------
(eng) Matte Red or Glittery Pink 🚨❄️Two makeup looks for Winter Holiday - Duration: 5:16.
Today I'm gonna show you guys this Chinoiserie collection by Addiction
and I'll do these two different makeup looks for winter holiday.
There are 7 liquid eyeliners and 6 eyeshadows.
Then I'll show you the swatches.
The textures of the eyeshadows are various.
It's very pigmented even by just one touch.
It gets more vivid by layering tough.
The pigment is really good and it goes like this naturally and delicately as well.
Those colors were the hottest colors of the Empress Orchid collection which came out before.
The eyeliners have various textures as well.
It's also very pigmented and you can control the thickness easily
so you can draw eyelines without mistakes.
It gets hard after applying it, so it lasts long.
And those colors are same as the eyeshadows so you can put them on together and do some fun makeup.
Then let's get into the makeup.
The first look is red point look with a #empire passion.
I'll apply #empire passion widely.
It's matte and has a pure red shade.
It sticks well naturally even by several layerings.
And I'll put on #empress orchid as a point.
There are small pearls in it and the shade is really vivid.
I'll use the same color #empire passion of the eyeliner.
I'll draw thick and clean lines.
I'll apply the mascara a lot to make my lashes look messy.
I'll use the pure red color on the lips as well.
It's done for the first makeup look.
The second look is more wearable makeup with the #pink river.
It's glittery light pink shadow. I'll apply it widely as the base.
I'll use the #china club together.
It has a shimmer texture and dark gray shade.
Those two look good together and the combination is wearable.
And I'll use the #china club eyeliner and draw the thin lines.
I'll use this blush with a muted pink shade.
And I applied the glossy tint with a cook toned pink shade.
It's done for the second look as well.
So today I tried those totally different makeup looks with the chinoiserie collection.
It came out a few days ago.
tough it's getting much interest.
So I think you should go to test them soon if you're interested in it.
Thank you so much for watching my video.
I'll see you in my next video!
Bye!
-------------------------------------------
1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse EVO Swap or Evolution is swaped in Eclipse : #EVOclipse Review (part 2) - Duration: 19:21.
Hello! last video about this
the car I was told that
it made on the basis of mitsubishi evolution.
but not told about the technical
features of this conversion, and this time
I want to tell exactly this.
Well, probably the story about this
I will begin my work from where it began.
namely bodywork.
cars in these years are deplorable
condition and it was no exception.
we had to sandblast it completely.
we had to patch all the holes, weld the shock housing.
DSMers understand me.
then we covered everything with acidic primer.
processed
painted and coated "Raptor" on top.
"raptor" blue in body color
adds a certain charm.
about body repair for a long time
I will not tell - this is not my main hobby.
even not at all my hobby.
I will tell you about the SWAP and first
turn this swap on all-wheel drive.
Originally this car, like many
Eclipses, was front wheel drive. although in the line
There are all-wheel drive options.
we converted this car for four-wheel drive.
What did you have to do for this?
first and foremost of course
Install the rear all-wheel drive subframe.
options for such an installation
some.
have a OEM subframe all-wheel drive Eclipse.
the so-called gsx option and
it is possible to install
crossmember from legnum.
Mitsubishi Legnum - Japanese "bucket" and I do not remember how it looks.
but they have the same crossmember with the Eclipse.
most swapers who
there is access to the Japanese market closer than
American they use this particular
subframe, and in general all the back
suspension, rear arms, drive, hubs.
They all put bolton
on this car and not
requires special skills to rework.
many nuances of swap
can be seen in my videos. Now I do a lot of videos,
dedicated to just such alterations.
conversions on all-wheel drive cars
generation 2, 3, 4, dodge and chrysler.
In general, all that is built
on a common spar base.
2nd, 3rd, 4th eclipses.
the first and main reason for which
I chose a rear suspension from Legnum.
from Mitsubishi Legnum.
that was her location.
the location of the passage under the propeller shaft and exhaust.
in gsx version, in original
mitsubishi eclipse exhaust passes with
the left side of the propeller shaft passes from the right
parties.
but we have a engine
from evolution 9 and we are very
it is important that the exhaust passes
on the right side and
propeller shaft left.
that was the main reason for choosing this
donor for the rear all-wheel drive suspension.
suspension as well as fuel tank
taken from legnum.
About the back of the car, I think that's enough.
now let's get to the most important part
all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive
cars are a propeller shaft.
like many parts, of course the propeller shaft
There is in the original on mitsubishi eclipse.
on the all-wheel drive version of the GSX stands
your propeller shaft and you could put it here.
without bothering, practically in
regular mounting, but we have another
religion built cars.
we use the maximum EVO parts.
I like EVO propeller shaft more.
it is modern with a short middle section.
I wanted to put the EVO propeller shaft in this car.
I'm in all my
recent projects put EVO propeller shafts.
I like them.
made new mounts on the body
car.
such are the reinforced pieces of metal that hold the propeller shaft.
in fact, not without nuances.
now in the past
some run - there are shoals.
in this case, here it is
the distance is very small and it will be necessary
increase because
under certain loads propeller shaft
deformed and touches the mount.
general not without jambs.
we are all human, we are all wrong.
since we chose the direction of movement
from the back forward then
the next all-wheel drive element
installed in this car
is transfer case. transfer case from EVO6
with a gear ratio the same as
rear gear ratio is 3.312
main problem
in the whole swap it was exactly
installation of this handing out pass
in the stretcher, access to the propeller shaft.
all this swap is basic
his problem was precisely in all these ways
installation geometry.
because transfer case carries an axis
front end
front drive installation, direction
propeller shaft movement. all geometric things
The provisions of the handout depend.
it is the center of the all-wheel drive transmission mitsubishi.
there is a lock in it
central differential which
transmits the moment between the front and the back
axis.
there is a front axle differential in it.
there is this power
element,
which makes spinning
all-wheel drive car.
without hand-outs the car will not go at all.
transfer case is geometrically
main element.
so I had to redo it very much
front crossmember.
front crossmember remained native.
I tried the installation options
crossmember version with factory 4G63 engine.
there are a lot of problems with this
designed for the installation of the gearbox on the left side.
we have a gearbox with the right
parties along my way along for
cars are the opposite.
From the 420a motor crossmember it is very smooth
becomes with EVO motor because u
these gearboxes are located with one and
the same side.
do not alter the niche under the gearbox.
she is already there and only needed
make a tunnel for the installation of the propeller shaft.
this one has been made.
stretcher reinforced.
crossmember has new connecting elements
stiffeners and now it's completely
allows you to install the propeller shaft with
transmissions from evolution.
the next logical node is itself
Transmission. of course again from evolution.
it's a five-speed
manual gearbox.
why five-speed?
because the other 6-speed
will not go down the length.
prevent the spar and basically here
only one installation option
5-speed transmission or
machine from evolution.
geometry of the suspension and the whole
transmission set transfer case.
In transfer case attached gearbox.
gearbox attached to the motor.
in principle, geometrically transmission
part is all set, all aligned.
but the motor must be put geometrically even
geometrically correct.
actually swap on evo
I did not invent it, they did it before me.
in many swaps on evo
they were mostly front wheel drive,
all-wheel drive I have not seen, but it does not matter.
when they put an EVO motor,
for some reason he is with them
so low that even the lower mounts
crossmembers are taller than pallet
motor.
I wanted to do exactly
factory solution to make by car
could comfortably ride on the roads.
do not catch every pebble in the pan.
move around like a normal car
understated or overpriced.
the engine tray and the motor itself must be
located just like at the factory.
as a result, put the engine as I wanted
that is, the motor is now higher than
stretcher it is not the lowest
point in the car. by the way here
unusual pallet. on the evo 9 RS engine version
there was such a pallet.
it has a small defender.
in our case, very useful because
protects the engine from all sorts of
damage.
the next element about which I wanted
to tell, being under the car is
cooling system. aluminum radiator
It looks the same as on all tuned Eclipses.
in this case
The subaru part has been applied.
this radiator originally went on
subaru.
yes it is an universal radiator.
It is not the original subaru radiator.
we did not deliver parts from subaru to mitsubishi.
but nominally it is from subaru.
he went geometrically.
he allowed to put the crossmember mount, although in it
I had to make such a small propyl.
slightly deform but it
allowed to install the crossmember mount in its place
without global body alterations.
mitsubishi eclipse as in many
originally front wheel drive cars
TV, more precisely the lower part
contacts the crossmember
Here is such a crossmember mount. she happens to be
power element, it keeps the design
car. usually attached to it
motor mount. in our case she
go nowhere.
here is this crossmember mount from
lancer.
from lancer evolution. principle can
set the crossmember mount from lancer but from lancer
evolution is distinguished by its presence
hook and more reinforced
stand under the front.
The crossmember mount was also finalized, it is now a different length.
it connects the crossmember parts.
that have been trimmed and reinforced in these places.
original crossmember mount from lancer
ends here.
Eclipse crossmember mount ends on the back wall
crossmember, respectively, we extended it
and reinforced made additional
mounts. it is installed so it does not interfere
of course the transmissions. as in the original
All gaps are saved.
You can see that in principle, as in the factory
eclipse, as at the factory evolution left in those
same gaps and used the same attachment points.
front cushion used
also from lancer.
use eclipse pillow
there was no need.
crossmember mount from lancer
and geometric pillows are similar.
we used a standard lancer pillow.
from lancer evolution.
so that it could always be later
repair this car from
parts purchased store.
back cushion.
we won't see her,
she stands over the crossmember.
This is a standard pillow,
which was used in eclipse.
this is the only pillow
which remained dear.
all the other pillows are either altered,
or put others. This pillow is worth a dear.
What else can you tell while under the car?
also had to modify
oil cooling system.
radiator from 9 evolution installed, like many
details from the 9th.
standing here
spacer for sensors.
here
native exits to the radiator.
this is just a spacer for
Priborchikov, which stand in the cabin.
continuing the topic of radiators is also here
additional radiator installed
cooling power steering.
this is not a standard solution, usually
on mitsubishi machines used
simple pipe form.
we put a radiator to play it safe and
make some clearance for
performance and
for its reliability.
the next radiator is a radiator
air cooling.
yes yes this is the same intercooler its also a radiator, it just cools the air.
planned machine upgrades are great,
we will later remove more power
therefore, we also took a large stock.
huge intercooler.
76 mm I / O.
76 mm inlet.
turbine exit standard
50 mm goes into the pipe 76 mm
and on the intercooler size of 100mm passes into the throttle.
by the way - fans.
like most electricians and
electronics is also from evolution
here is the start block.
regular fan
evolution reworked mount.
all the same radiator from subaru.
he has a little
other mounts.
but this is not a big rework.
one more detail that can be seen
just below
This is a zero resistance filter.
it is installed behind the headlamp,
in the wing, the air intake comes from below.
cold air intake.
top he has a kind of house and hot air is not
comes to this
filter from the engine compartment.
he collects all the cold air
just from the bottom of the car.
and he will not be able to pick up the water in the rain
or in a puddle.
optimal arrangement of such
filter in this car.
the last part about which we have to
tell from below.
exhaust system.
This system of course had to
create from scratch. entire exhaust system
This is a 3 inch 76 millimeter.
she goes around
All bends of the transfer case.
runs parallel to the propeller shaft goes
in the back. basically the system is pretty
simple but at the same time
productive. it ends
beautiful muffler.
exhaust is not quiet.
machine used as a weekend car
and if you wish, there are places where
you can install resonators.
if you want
make it quieter.
now it sounds pretty loud
but beautifully loud. so we leave it
this version.
told all that is under the car.
Of course I forgot something.
if you forgot to write me
comments and I will once again make a review about this car.
but even so I want to go to the top and show the engine bay.
all the swap came down all the same
to replace the motor.
and the main node which
says that this evolution is a engine from evolution.
how much would I show and talk about what
is under the car.
the most important thing that she has under the hood.
let's go to!
Well, the hood is open and here it is
engine from evolution!
carbon fiber is no surprise!
We tried to make everything harmonious!
.......
-------------------------------------------
free xbox live gold or how to get free xbox codes and free xbox codes live New!!! - Duration: 2:56.
free xbox live gold or how to get free xbox codes and free xbox codes live New!!!
-------------------------------------------
Berlin parking: model or cautionary tale? (Reinventing Parking #6) - Duration: 29:03.
This is not one of those "wow look at Berlin! Isn't it so amazing! It's got
such fantastic parking policy, so why can't we do that?"
versions of the Berlin story. Welcome to Reinventing Parking, the podcast about
parking policy for anyone who wants a better city and better urban transport.
I'm Paul Barter. Today I'm speaking with Jos Nino Notz about parking in
Berlin in Germany. Parking people in my network suggested that I speak with Nino
primarily because of his excellent master's thesis at the Technical
University of Berlin, which looked at conflict between parking and public
space from various angles. Nino has been working for several years as a traffic
planner and consultant in Berlin before recently joining the Cities team at Buro
Happold Engineering. Jos Nino Notz
welcome to the Reinventing Parking podcast. Thank you so much for joining me.
[Nino] Thank you for having me, Paul. So today we're talking about parking policy in
Berlin. This is not one of those, "wow look at Berlin, and isn't it so amazing! It's
got such fantastic parking policy, so why can't we do that?"
versions of the Berlin story, because actually, when it comes to parking policy,
one thing that I found when I visited in September and talked to you and many
other parking experts in Germany, is that, surprisingly, parking policy in
Germany has quite a few weaknesses as well as some strengths. So what we'll be
trying to do is to learn from both the highs and the lows, I hope. But I think
what we do is we'll start with one of the strengths or one of the one of the
things that people outside Germany would be quite impressed by, which is the topic
of the abolition of parking minimums in Berlin. Right, so as I understand it, in
the 1990s at some point Berlin abolished its minimum parking requirements
completely could you tell tell us a little bit more
about that of course it's it's two parking minimums were abolished in
Berlin um the first city in Germany where it was totally abolished and I
have to add that it's not abolished for bicycle parking and parking spaces for
disabled people so there are still minimums for that but in the general
parking minimums were abolished completely and today a Hamburg for
example as the second city in Germany has also abolished its parking minimums
but Berlin was the first I can say some more to that and because I met people
who were actually involved in this abolition and it was actually originally
planned to instead of those parking minimums to actually set parking
maximums and or at least incorporate the possibility to do so in individual
developments but this did not happen so we didn't go the final step
to your knowledge is it is there any sort of backlash against this policy
since it was implemented it's now more than 20 years no there's no no backlash
I would say because liberation is pretty much good for for economy so they can
they can do what they want and it's actually pretty popular with builders
and owners because it provides them freedom of choice and for them what is
most important it provides the possibility to reduce cost in general
you could say it's about 10% of cost you can save if you don't build so much
parking this is also why the trend is kind of spreading in Germany but it's
mainly because of cost reduction when developers do build office buildings
residential buildings do they build significantly less than they used to and
is it common to have parking at almost zero except for the bicycle parking and
parking for people with disabilities yeah this is interesting there has been
some evaluation on that from from an Institute for urban studies in Germany
they looked at some developments that were made after after 98 and what we can
see is that especially in the context of housing as I said a lot of pillars
actually don't build excessive parking anymore because they actually do reduce
cost at parking but especially in the context of very big development so as
you said like office shopping centers and stuff even if the end of in the city
center it is still common to build large car parks just as we are we were used to
because these international developments usually they they work with
international standards and habits and also for them it's important to be able
to sell the whole complexes maybe afterwards and so they still build large
car parks that's interesting isn't it so for people who are in cities where
there's a debate going on about minimum parking requirements in some ways that's
reassuring because
the fears that there'll be a huge shortage and an outcry and a huge
backlash and problems in Berlin abolished as parking minimums and
there's no clear sign of any huge problems arising that's reassuring
but for those who want to see less parking it's perhaps slightly
disappointing there's somewhat less parking developers can choose and
sometimes they take advantage of that but very often from what you're saying
they still provide maybe too much parking even in even in certain
locations where the city would like them to build lesser yeah yeah that's true
I mean there's always the possibility for administration to negotiate the
amount of park and within certain contracts for for a certain development
so but in general there was no uproar or actually as I said economy pretty much
likes the liberation because they can choose and yeah people in the United
States or Australia New Zealand Canada would be expecting you to be talking
about residents in dense areas where there's redevelopment going on and new
apartment buildings going in because they're the competition for on the
street parking is acute is that part of the story in Berlin we have a very
special situation in Berlin that most people actually living in the dense city
already today don't don't own a car like if you look
at the whole city which is very widespread only half of the household
households actually own a car so we have the situation that for a lot of people
it's very common to live without a car and so the issue is not that big and the
second thing is that we have large amounts of buildings from the beginning
of the 20th century and within that time they will usually know no parking
included when the building was erected so and these people are used to parking
their cars on the streets anyway and they're not worried that new
developments a new building in the neighborhood would
add to the competition for that on street parking that is a topic you're
right but pretty much what it comes down to is people or residents saying we need
more parking or we don't want more more buildings it's all too dense it's not so
the conversation is not so detailed interesting big parking minimums are so
far in the past people don't even raise them as a possibility perhaps they're
concerned about parking competition for parking but the focus of the debate is
about things that are possible like stopping that building or providing more
parking in the area it's not about it's not about requiring these buildings to
have more parking right this general regulation the parking minimum or
maximum I think this is something that stays very much in the background this
is also why politicians had no problem actually abolishing those minimums
because only very certain people think about this matter but they were very
anxious to go one step further and publish parking maximums because that
would be something I think that will also raise higher waves you know like it
would go more out that there's a fundamental change so they kind of took
the easy part it's all written down it was just never rectified okay so maybe
let's move on to another topic so the first strength of buildings parking is
the above abolition of the parking minimums which is very impressive it was
across the whole of the city right it's not just the inner city and you know the
building municipality does not quite cover the whole metropolitan area but
it's most of it so that's quite an impressive reform the next issue that's
reasonably strong I guess is that in the very core of the city and as well as one
or two other areas there is fairly intensive parking management could could
you describe a little bit more about how that works well parking management and
the pricing of parking and public streets is the competence of local
authorities that is like city districts and so the city districts themselves
look at the situation okay Berlin is divided into several light
districts that have their own local government right the government the
local governments are not so strong but it's more about they have they all have
their own administration but if there's a big difference between the city
district some are very doing intense parking management some are doing none
so you might have been to the spots where for example in the very downtown
districts where there's a very pretty much the whole areas covered and priced
but there's also inner-city areas where there is no pricing or management at all
the very central area is has strong control and if you go to the North East
a little bit the old is part of the old East Berlin but reasonably far out I
forget the name of the district Prince lower Prince yes that's a lot about but
if you go directly south of the old city center I think it's Kreuzberg right you
find free parking that the main shopping street in Kreuzberg has free parking and
similarly if you go Northwest into more a bit you find free parking even though
it's a very similar area all three of these areas are very similar they're old
they're dense there's a lot of competition for parking but only one of
those areas has intense parking management the other two don't right so
this is this is what you're totally right this is what I just said that like
the Burroughs administration and also the political leadership the powers is
different so some areas are very far like the very central part Berlin Mitte
and as you said and also Prince lower back you mentioned that but for example
arts back is just starting and there they see the success in meters so they
want to also do the same and of course also because courts back is next to
meter and we have pricing and meter means that more people try to evade
pricing and put pressure on these surrounding boroughs that not yet have
pricing and parking management so of course those powers kind of also started
doing steps but some do some don't so that there's these three different
prices how do they decide which areas have two euros per hour in fact it's
actually 50 euro cents per 15 minutes 75 Euro cents per 15 minutes and 1 euro per
15 minutes how has it decided what price is the right price yeah when planners
traffic planners look at it and look at the situation make traffic counts they
also make feasibility studies for how expensive is enforcement how much money
do we need to cover all these expenses and with that they make a proposal to to
the borough administration which price they should set in the end the price is
politically said so I guess reading between the lines a little bit there
it's not it's not a completely objective scientific process like monitoring
occupancy tzer's as our friend Donald Shoop would suggest right but to some
extent demand is part of the story but as you say there's a political decision
has to be made the politician has to vote to put those prices in right you're
totally right it's not a dynamic pricing scheme and it's also not as what you say
but as complex in detail there was Donald Shoop proposes and what is done
in other places but the the evaluation there's also evaluation going on and if
they see that as mentioned that the parking price is not right they will
change it would it be a mistake to say that in those areas that have parking
pricing the enforcement of the parking rules is also pretty good or are there
some enforcement problems even in these areas I would say the enforcement is
pretty good and in the areas where we have pricing also because enforcement
and pricing is connected pretty strongly as I said it's when we plan enforcement
it's already there's a feasibility study how much enforcement we need so it's
like an integral part of the management scheme the big problem with the
enforcement is this in the areas where it's not priced Tom tell me about
with enforcement in the areas that are not cast the problem is actually very
easy in most areas where there's no parking management no pricing there's
also no enforcement that's just pretty much how it is it's not because we don't
want the enforcement but it's because enforcement needs a lot of resource of
course it's expensive and at the same time it's also responsibility of the
local authorities so if there is no local revenues from pricing parking that
directly funds the enforcement there is in general enforcement is neglected it
sounds like the penalty revenue does not go to the local government in Germany is
that correct to be honest I think they've changed something about it I
think part of it now goes to the local administration in former times it did
not it went to the city itself it was not considered part of the transport
sector but more like of the police work they changed something about it but
still if there's little enforcement there's also almost no penalties and
there's also no money so of course so it's a little bit of a vicious cycle if
a right right so if they started to enforce better then they might find they
get some revenue and they could it could be a virtuous cycle but there's another
problem that I heard when I was in Germany I there's a national rule that
limits the levels of some of the penalties or most of the penalties set
at the national level is that correct could you explain from that is right and
this is actually a big part of the problem I also identified traffic laws
most traffic laws are federal competence and also setting those penalties and
fees is the national thing and they are very low in Germany
I mean it's um they are so low that if you rationally calculate how much you
pay if if you don't park legally and how much time you say if you would probably
be better off in a lot of places just parking somewhere instead of looking for
a free parking lot all the time so this is actually a big problem the fees are
very low so in is inhibited by a national regulation of
course it's it's useful if there's some kind of standardization right at the
national level so for example parking signs
I shouldn't be different from city to city but it sounds like the the federal
government in Germany has gone too far in regulating too many things about
parking so the enforcement fines were one of one example I think there's some
other examples was residential parking permit fees was that another example
yeah right this is the second thing the residential parking fees are also like
kept on a national level there's a maximum set by by federal fees which is
30 euros a year hmm I guess it's quite common for residential parking fees to
be low but usually the decision is is done as a political decision at a local
level it's not something that set at the national level right in in Germany are
there local governments that want to increase the residential fee to a higher
level than 30 euros there's a big debate going on about this just just recently
of course traffic planners argument for this and also Tama city planners a lot
of people a lot of experts say we need to definitely raise those permit prices
but I have to add that the residents or a lot of people already already consider
this a ripoff like there is no in the perception because parking was free all
the time for decades there is no real understanding for for the value this
opportunity to park and the public space has continued to say a little bit more
about how the how the various actors in this story talk about parking and frame
parking as a political issue and as an economic good yeah what I would like to
stress is that in the federal traffic laws parking is considered part of the
traffic so we have this word station in traffic so actually a vehicle that
doesn't move and just stands there is also considered
traffic and in our federal traffic laws which are I would say very outdated
there's this idea that traffic needs to be possible for everybody everywhere all
the time and this is this also reaches out to the station of traffic so we have
this basic framework in Germany that says well we need to provide sufficient
parking for everybody everywhere and in general it should not be priced and if
we have bad situation in stationary traffic and we allow to take on measures
like pricing schemes we are restricted in how high we can set the prices by
federal law again that reminds me we forgot to mention something earlier when
we were talking about the pricing and you just kind of alluded to it is that
the on street parking pricing is seen as a fairly narrow narrowly framed issue
isn't it it's purely about managing the on street parking right in some ways I
I'm sympathetic to that because I think on street parking probably is best on
that way anyway but it does mean that the presumption is parking should be
free as you just said and so in order to have any pricing quite quite a strenuous
effort has to be made to prove that the pricing is necessary so that's kind of
an obstacle isn't it right because in Germany the approach cannot be to say
well we have little urban space we need more urban space quality for recreation
and stuff and therefore we need to change the use of public streets and
parts and therefore we need to set prices to lower the demand for parking
this is not the way it works Germany it works pretty much as you said it's a
technical issue so if we see that there is a lot of competition for parking and
people using cars cannot find the vacant spot only then we can use pricing to
soothe the condition and to to make it possible for car users to find a vacant
spot again so pretty much it's all about the parking itself and it's not about
all the other uses of public street space we could imagine or we were
one in the city okay so you mentioned the use of Street space and public space
and in fact that that was the reason I was invited to Berlin in the first place
because the event I spoke at what was it was an event all about the use of public
space and Street space and I was the only one talking about parking in that
connection right and so as I understand it that the the organization that
invited me Agora fakirs vendor which is a forum for transport transformation was
very interested in this possibility of street space reallocation and the fact
that parking policy and parking practices is an obstacle to that right
but I understand that in Berlin there this some progress is being made right
there there's a few examples of some good things happening but from what you
said it's not fast enough for or there's also some obstacles can you can you
elaborate a little bit yeah I think there is progress made and also
awareness is rising but there is no real holistic approach to it on on the city
level pretty much the cities say well yeah we want to we would like to have
more more pricing and enforcement more management in general and so they want
the local authorities in the boroughs to implement that some follows some don't
it's not seen as a basic component of like for example is sustainable urban
mobility plan or stuff it's not seen as one of the most important measures to to
work on travel demands work and model choice to work on on the
quality of urban urban relevant cities this is just not happening yet a graphic
has vendor presented some examples of some experiments of rearranging the
parking in local streets to true so that parking plays a role in traffic calming
there's some loss of spaces but small but a great improvement in the public
realm do you know much about those examples there
is of course also Germany in Berlin but also other places a lot of good examples
already how urban spaces are turned from from pretty much parking lots to maybe
areas with the recreational value and quality for just people to wander around
sit around and get in contact but of course it has an impact on parking and
also parking is very often a very big issue if it comes to working with the
public on those projects yeah that would be familiar to people in other countries
in other cities where you know that there's a your planners or urban
designers will come up with a lovely proposal but it involves losing a
certain small percentage of parking spaces in the district and those parking
spaces become the focus of the debate the street where the mayor of Berlin
lives them was actually changed there was a traffic calming measure within the
street where he lived six spots for parking yeah had to go which is not so
much I guess and he was how would you say he was not delighted he actually
made a statement about it in public that this was not that he does not like to
see this so bicycle lanes building has a remarkably high modal share for bicycles
considering that the infrastructure for bicycles is actually rather poor yeah
when you actually look at the bike lanes a lot of them are just paint and a lot
of them are not don't look very safe to me but nevertheless there's a lot of
cycling but I understand there's been some progress recently on creating much
improved bicycle lanes perhaps with protected bike lanes now including
parking protected bike lanes is there a story what's going on there
we start with parking and bike lanes yeah you're totally right the numbers of
people using bike rising and the the funding for bicycle infrastructure is
went up like by hundreds of percent so pretty much the political courage to
improve bicycle infrastructure is there the money is there but we really still
have a big problem spending that money and actually
changing the built environment because it's the same issue when it comes down
to individual projects and individual streets and we really want to change
something it's it's usually parking spots that would need to go to have more
space for this new infrastructure and when it comes to that politicians are
still very anxious we had like an analysis for like a a bicycle highway
network for the city of Berlin and and now it would be the time to have the
first bicycle highways be built and it so far it doesn't happen because no one
won in the boroughs wants to make the start no local politician wants to be
the first to say we are getting a bicycle highway and yeah we will get rid
of a few hundred parking spots yes so this is all somewhat amusing to me
because as a parking and transport consultant very often the German
technical assistance agency G Isaiah employs me and for example I might go to
China or India and often I'll point to Berlin as a place with pretty good
parking management pretty good parking policies I might port to point to the
abolition of the parking minimums and and so on but of course everything's
relative so Berlin from the perspective of a
Chinese city with with complete and utter of parking chaos in the streets
building looks very good but when you're actually in Berlin it could be so much
better and there's still a lot there's a lot of room for improvement
so I gather from your perspective you're looking to places like Swiss cities and
Austrian cities as examples that died a little better maybe Dutch cities is that
right yeah yeah yeah definitely and I just you're totally right it depends on
the perspective of course I mean in Germany as most pretty much most things
are very much in order and probably designed and there's a lot of
negotiations before something's implemented so the conditions are pretty
good and as I said not very many people that
without a car so also that the pressure is not too high this is maybe also why
not so much has changed in the past but now we're coming to a point where we
would love people would want more change and for for me I as you said I look to
Switzerland I look to the Netherlands or I also look to two other places in
Scandinavia where where they're much further and also they they're more
courageous to say that we want the the whole central business district to be
car free in five years and yet they're just going for it
right so thank thanks a lot you know thanks for being the reinventing parking
podcast thank you for having me Paul was a pleasure you've been listening to the
reinventing parking podcast and I'm Paul barter you can find out more at
reinventing parking org where you'll find ideas and tips on parking policy
you can also listen to other episodes subscribe or leave a comment
that's reinventing parking dot o-r-g bye for now
-------------------------------------------
Should you BUY your home, or continue to RENT?? Lets talk about it! - Duration: 4:52.
So, I'm at this open house and I'm scrolling through Facebook and I see an ad for an apartment complex pop-up
It was for a two-bedroom one-bath apartment for $1345.00 a month
so
naturally
I was curious and I put this number into a Google calculator
and found that the maximum loan I could get for a monthly payment of thirteen forty five is actually
two hundred and seventy three thousand dollars
So that means I could buy a home valued at two hundred seventy three thousand and pay right around
Thirteen forty five a month or I could continue to rent the apartment for thirteen forty five a month
I took this a step further and did a quick our MLS search for similar criteria to the apartment
so 2-bedroom 1-bath or two-bedroom two-bath
similar square footage and at a price under the two hundred seventy three thousand dollars and
Found that there were quite a few options out there in Clark County that you could buy
I found one in particular that was listed in Hazel Bell for two hundred and fifty nine
thousand dollars so under our budget of
$273,000 it is a two-bedroom one-bath
But it does have your kitchen your living room the two bedrooms and it also has a finished bonus room downstairs. The square footage is
1452 square feet which is much bigger than the apartment was and it's on the point two acre law in Hazel Dell it also has
plenty of parking with a garage slash shed in the back and then your parking strip buying a home is very
Possible. You just have to be connected to the right people to make it happen
Now there are pros and cons of being in an apartment and being in a home
So let's talk about a few of them. First the apartment cons some of these include having a shared laundry
There's hardly ever enough parking for two people
You can have neighbors above below and to both sides of you the apartments
I see have tiny bedrooms. Your apartment rent will likely
Increase once your lease is up and you're at the mercy of your apartment complex
They're going to have rules that you're going to have to abide by there are pros to living in an apartment though
you never have to deal with maintenance because that's the apartment complex is a
responsibility a lot of apartment complexes also have some sort of common area whether that be a pool a
basketball court a covered picnic table or an inside common area a lot of
Apartment complexes also pay for your water sewer and garbage, which is worth about $75 but depends on how much you use now
Let's talk about homes
There are some cons to owning a home you are on the hook for all of the maintenance and everything that happens on your property
So something goes out. You're going to have to fix it now
There are ways around this and different programs that you can utilize such as including a home warranty when you buy your home
but at the end of the day you're
responsible for everything another con is that you're going to have to pay more bills such as water sewer and garbage and an apartment you
Probably already pay for electrical costs the biggest pro to owning
your home is that you're gaining equity and building your wealth as time goes on property values are
generally going to increase
so even if you're making the minimum payment in two years
If you go to sell you'll likely have equity if you buy a single-family detached home
You're not going to have any immediate
Neighbors to worry about this means that you can pound on your walls stomp on your floor and no one's going to complain the biggest
Pro to owning a home in my opinion is the stability when it comes to monthly payments in an apartment
Your lease is going to expire and it's probably going to increase who knows how much it's going to increase
But you can count on the payment being higher with a home your payment is going to stay the same
Assuming you're on a fixed interest rate. What are the only things that's going to affect your payment is going to be property taxes
So if the property tax rate changes or your home is reassessed, that's when your mortgage is going to increase
But there's not going to be any annual increases like you'll see eight in an apartment now to top it all off
Nobody wants to move during the winter, which is coming up
This means that property values generally level off if they don't decrease a little bit
This happens every single year and it's nothing to be afraid of apartment complexes know that nobody wants to move during the winter
which is why they will offer you lower rates if your lease is set to expire during the winter if you're thinking about buying a
Home in the next couple years now is really the time to think about talking to a mortgage lender
There is no commitment and no pressure. So talking to them doesn't cost you anything
You can look at the Fed interest rate
And we can predict that interest rates will continue to increase for at least the next year
Probably by a quarter percent every single quarter
This means that if you wait a year to buy you're going to be able to buy
Less house for the same payment because there's gonna be more interest. There's no pressure when you go and talk to a mortgage lender
They're going to look at your credit
Look at your assets and find out if owning a home is possible right now
And the best ones will help you work towards your goal of being able to buy a home
So even if it's not some thing you can do now
They can help you plan for the future and put you in a position to buy
Next year or the year after as always
If you have questions
Please come with them down below and I will get back to you as soon as possible if you want to learn more about buying
Your first home
I'll include a link to some information that you should definitely take a look at if you're even thinking about it
please share this on whatever social media you're using and tag someone if you know that they're thinking about buying thanks for watching and I'll
Talk to you guys soon
-------------------------------------------
Trick or Treat Round (www.choralclarity.com) - Duration: 0:51.
sheet music available for instant download at www.choralclarity.com
-------------------------------------------
Building amnesty in Italy 2018, favorable or contrary? - Duration: 18:36.
online and this time you screwed me.
let's start this urban breakfast here with me andrea pantaleo and one day everyone
I can tag you split we cut it then tagged then then today 28
October let's talk about a thorny topic
we want to do in a policy way such a way to make a small painting
clarification without a vein of controversy ok for which we have also activated for
andrea along in the meantime the tag flame here is a survey condone building
you are in favor and 7 against and seen that this is coming back into the limelight
issue of building amnesty on ischia that even here it is a draft we do not know
well what happens we do not want I personally do not want to take
position on is right wrong season building a very, very many question
complex and can not be reduced to one bar or breakfast issue
urban protection but waiting we wait for other friends to connect
and a minute more if you can share this direct
also on facebook groups on groups especially for professionals
we thank you in advance for the book I advise you see it in reverse is
up the great art of war classic that serves a lot to clarify the
question of military strategy I repeat below you can vote on
you have already voted and a poll we also opened yesterday Andrea
we want to start we can vices starting this evergreen is a
argument of the ways that each time it is he always speaks
with carlo occasionally returns to the limelight then just mentioned
the the case of risk then we will see them one
well what will happen is more than anything else we wanted the survey was aimed
especially also to a question that it concerned a little the mentality of what it was
is rooted inherent in the 30 to the two amnesty polls we have parallel ra.gi
the first was on facebook and the find on my personal profile e
the other was on instagram then the first if I'm not mistaken is why
ie, to the ace both in progress the one on facebook, more or less given yesterday
it was 50 and 5 27 st on the draw instagram surprised us instagram and for
not for monterano contrary to condone on instagram then it is not a
significant sample seen the area is a mini age champion
let's say a hint instagram is recognized that it is a target
predominantly young and juvenile here above all it struck me on
instagram the comments they did neither we want to read someone
you keep voting and then at the end of this direct we give the result it
we see we do not know if you see it too you but I see it here I also see a
lots of comments that pass from this part how to read say veroli brian
bryan rise we salute or well alla brian says we must defeat the
culture of the amnesty and not to encourage it here this is because no to the amnesty
building there are other other technical colleagues
studies have given their vote and the own opinion
many are expressing the opposite opinion they justified it by saying that in
this way we go to stimulate the culture of illegality or otherwise of
reward the smart compared to whom respects the rules is not in addition to
this there are a series of analyzes from do urban planning instead what
it happens with the condono that is the damage it does in even in other videos
we had mentioned the question of how the building amnesty designed for
however, this is not exactly exquisite of necessity in rearranging the structure
urban then the reading that took place from part of the
on the part of the citizens was that alas in exploiting exploitation
like a real lever of speculation and also exact as one
real lever of speculation so perhaps when it was short he said
we need to change the level of mentality it is because we are heirs to a situation
urban planning that however much then comes the amnesty that the whole system
we also do a little one that was in actually an epic but it's a big one
difference we talk about the amnesties significant we talk about abuses they detect
those of those abuses they really have distorted prisoners and we do not speak
Let's call them the condonions by necessity let's say for the abuses of necessity
I can take a very short pic precisely then above all we would like to highlight
a small watershed between abuses so-called relevant therefore between whom
really builds a new home for the family and minor abuses that is
what maybe moves the partition or I repeat the door we do not want right
create in this sense rather we want to highlight one thing they do
necessary especially for abuses big building applications question mark then
here too there is a problem to realize these series of constructions
some parts the territory means also damage or affect the
territory there is a need for standards urban planning services
they are inhabitants at the end so they will have need kindergartens and schools will have
need all the drains because the problem is not the amnesty of the artifact
it's all that is brought with it all context within which that
manufactured that is then legitimized therefore it exists as beautiful said you
we also talk about a context territorial but also of services
collective because martin denied the the collectivity
also because then you are counted and you have to you have the right to have the same services
of the of the rest of the city, in short, exactly
poll is going on ha continued to vote we see the bar
here I do not know where you see it though piccate condono building favorable or
contrary maybe then because you do not write us in
comments because you are favorable because you're against so maybe you're looking for it too
to respond live on 1 I am a little more said to the director for they had
amorese if I repeat, checking what they are of the second condensation
answering very well another aspect of the amnesty is that much
it has often been conceived as a norm for have the state coffers put out
pay the oblations penalties and charges by saying
someone made budgets he said but here is more the damage of the gain too
collective terms the theme is now returning to the limelight
of the amnesty we said because it seems the proposal for an amnesty has appeared
circumscribed to ischia because there is a objective problem of rebuilding
properties that were the subject of applications for still pending even after 30
but really years as if they were rebuilding if the application for an amnesty then they had
studied a sort of acceleration of the application for amnesty, however, with one
little variation and I stop it here because otherwise you risk giving yourself to the
controversy is not our most objective absolutely rather it is to try to
reflect if the amnesty if a quarter condono because we already have in Italy
had three in fact we must not speak of amnesty
but of amnesties because they do not it was not a state of betting
that have followed each other but every amnesty he had some evidence they are going
by participating they are doing the bumper car we have real rules and
so we do not talk about a single amnesty but according to there also the survey is
addressed in understanding if it is a road right dari to resume or has
brought results that have not been and chelsea
exactly I repeat it for whoever it was connected now because there is also some
replacement we are talking about building abuses
those relevant to buildings widely elevations subdivisions
abusive eco monsters you are not talking about of the modest abuse or the discrepancy the
classic between means moving the door and so on
then there is the whole question of constraints that becomes them a sea baths
exact here is the question and the survey concerns building amnesty yes
but for substantial red big abuses then the problem of then arises as
to be able to heal we say modest abuses or or abuse some small entity on the
existing heritage we put that for some real estate reasons have been
treated in a certain way is a person who bought the apartment 20 30
Years ago it discovers from sail to sa longer 30
centimeters is an illicit busan yes though son dome there should be a choice
proportionality and a certain balance because indeed the problem for
we technicians who are going to do the regularizing the le
real estate trades then the problem arises continue to
vote I tell you that this also here in direct to the survey and update me that
we are missing for now at 53 percent favorable that say yes yes
for a few points that says stefano stefano everyone is very careful
against but at the time of the survey here we have 50 touched from 50
force serious guys in favor or against to the building amnesty
sin anonymously and that is not we will know if you have voted in one way or another
another ok and we will not be able to publish air data
they are the final data now a few minutes today the ten minutes i
we have not respected them not today because I'm really right now
comment a question on the fly so the we refer to instagram there by the way
they had done another there was a comment smart and interesting away
Marco says an example can be the maximum shack world born near
a torrent for residential use I can not read, I continue, he's right
there is also the problem of abuse done however where actually not
they can be remediable here there was not any condiments help
the smart ones but they are used to regularize previous three previous situations
precisely this was another point goes the fair removed the abuses those big ones
abuses even those speculative i need abuses
so I repeat the big abuse too a family of abuse let's call them abuse
but the abuse is what it is anyway criminally punishable
we talk about illicit deformities that however they are not so serious and that
they were made in the vintage ten dates remote and that however it is not proof
such as to affect the community e on the public interest effectively
antonio also antonio writes that for i for professionals it would be gold cast
or in a moment of crisis like this way would be sent to the air
however urbanism is true we will go to seeing antonio is very right then
we are still 50 and 50 more I think it oscillates from the favorable 47
50 favorable 50 beautiful contraries however, even here on facebook both on
Yesterday's poll is on that and we're going doing online there is always say the
balance on balance then how much do we give the last 60
second we are we do a little requisition the whole word we do the
summarized last minute then andrea we also greet friends of sight that
Yes I wanted to read a last one last
pietro message the rules must always be respected but it is
true exact that then it is repeated to be
favorable condono if I am also one philosophy
you are in favor of legality or question cunning, write it down
click here in the building amnesty overtaking 52 percent favorable 48
opposed you still have as much as 30 seconds I have the
recovery as you do as in football and recovery but in my opinion maybe it is
the interpretation of 55 percent surpasses still the fanta seven i
unknown abusers now now guys you joke is really a line you have to
pull a line to call it the jubilee line
then summarized to be favorable contrary to the amnesty does not mean
be automatically ana ha a philosophy of legality or of
illegality rather we said vuol say, maybe use some solutions a
some cases and others not, if anything, would go made a differentiated amnesty is this
that is perhaps coming out of this survey even if I repeat on instagram
instead the steering was more than the opposite and nickname is an impression is
opinion on a sample I repeat not not objective, not
as we say it is a champion, not not official non-representative official
however on instagram the probability one greater presence of young people makes us
think here above all young people are still against the logic of the amnesty
or better maybe not in the nature of the condone because it represents exact curly
that represents or how he entered also in the mentality then of the gods
guys because anyway they are condoning certainly linked to an illicit already already
happened weighed I can ask a question even half even half very well is like
if young people had a sort of desire redemption
according to me I think so because anyway there are so many arguments that now do not
we speak only on a level university I believe for those who took
addresses purely purely technicians, however, I think it's just for
a question of justice revenge of not living in the same
conditions negative in which he knows certain situations already
they are blondes they are broken balls of having to attend one more
A time to reward the clever compared to to the honest here this is the juice
let's close the direct request of the run-in the south ease here the survey in
direct we close it to 57 percent of the favorable and the 43 cover regarding
the contrary so this is we thank you that participation is
share I kindly ask you in this video so maybe even others
can continue to express themselves on go with comments or other exact ones
but what opinions do you share about the various social then what should they do
no, apart from sharing, comment more sing because I know these are precious
comments especially regarding also new ideas and new ideas
because no, there are also cases that there are kissed that are a lot
stimulating and that are not at all banal ok then other tips we have
said share comments subscribe on our youtube channels you look for us
name and surname carlo quaglia and andrea pantaleo and then what we do
we'll meet you on Sunday next 9 hours
what is the urban breakfast, however, we will do a formula in a different key does not exist
lose the topic we tell you in week if not spoiler no good there
we thank everyone for having a situation and for having participated
ok closed good sunday hello
-------------------------------------------
Jalen Richard Fantasy: Is the Raiders RB a Start or Sit? | Heavy.com - Duration: 5:14.
Jalen Richard Fantasy: Is the Raiders RB a Start or Sit? | Heavy.com
The Oakland Raiders will look quite a bit different in Week 8 of the NFL season.
Trading away top wide receiver Amari Cooper is just one reason for that, as the team also placed running back Marshawn Lynch on injured reserve.
Much of the talk around the Raiders at the position has been about Doug Martin, but he's not the player I have my eye on in fantasy football.
The name who's grabbed my attention is the electrifying Jalen Richard.
While Richard will almost undoubtedly see fewer carries than Martin, it's his ability as a pass-catcher and the increase in carries which makes him such an appealing option.
The 25-year-old back has totaled 31 catches for 253 yards through six games and will see an expanded workload beginning Sunday against the Indianapolis Colts.
Let's take a deeper dive into Richard's matchup and the situation to decide whether the Raiders running back is a fantasy start or sit this week.
Key Stats and Jalen Richard's Fantasy Outlook.
I'll break down the matchup along with a few numbers which jump out about Richard ahead of Sunday.
All information on fantasy points and statistics for defense vs.
position are from ESPN.
Indianapolis Colts vs.
running backs in 2018: 164 attempts, 669 rushing yards, 49 receptions, 384 receiving yards, four total touchdowns (No.
14 most fantasy points per game) Richard played 51 percent of the offensive snaps to Martin's 11 percent in Week 5 and 40 percent vs.
10 percent in Week 6, per Football Outsiders Richard has the second-most targets on the team this season with 37, behind only Jared Cook (43) He's caught at least six passes in four of six games this season.
The Colts are tied for the second-most receptions allowed to opposing running backs this season.
Based on the Raiders' usage of Richard to this point, there's no reason to believe his workload will decrease, even if Martin performs well on the ground.
It seems more likely the opposite happens, and Richard picks up extra work if his backfield mate struggles.
Should You Start or Sit Jalen Richard?.
Richard is about as solid of a filler in point-per-reception leagues as you'll find this week and beyond.
There's also a legitimate chance he could wind up carving out enough work on the ground to move into RB2 range.
How Jon Gruden and company choose to deploy their running backs will be worth monitoring, but Richard's role as the pass-catching back is secure.
I'd be comfortable using Richard in all PPR leagues with 12 or more teams and if you're incredibly thin at running back or need a flex play in a 10-team league, he's fine to use there as well.
Raiders quarterback Derek Carr has shown he trusts the young running back, and it doesn't hurt Richard has the potential to break a big play at any point.
READ NEXT: DeVante Parker Fantasy: Adding Dolphins WR Comes With Risk.
-------------------------------------------
수퍼비 억 가사, 사랑노래 or 돈자랑? 구찌백에서 벌킨백 과 롯데리아, 매드홀릭 아레나 와 3평 월세 이야기 구조 파트 - 쇼미더머니 777 창퍼비 음원 - Pence Linda - Duration: 5:02.
수퍼비의 첫 '사랑노래'라고 소개된 '억' 이 쇼미더머니777 8회 본선 1차 경연을 통해 나왔습니다.
그로 27일 토요일 오후 음원으로 발매됐고요. 아래 수퍼비&창모 억 가사(와 이야기 구조 관찰기) 담았습니다ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
프로그램에서는 '사실은 여린' 수퍼비와 프로듀서 창모 이야기를 하면서 아픔-슬픔을 내보이는 곡을 보인다고 했는데요.
그동안의 곡에 비교하면 수퍼비 과거 연인에 대해 말을 거는 형식의 곡은 새롭게 느껴지기도 합니다.
곡은 "이른 성공에 따른 허무한 내면"을 이야기한다고 하는데요.
"매일 밤 돈을 세다 잠에 들지만 꿈에 너가 나타나 잠 깨 uh"가사 단면에서도 볼 수 있죠.
반면 사랑 노래라고 하지만 가사에서는 "억이 있는데" "너무 바빠" "오데마 시계" "500 넘어 내 목걸이는"
"매드홀릭 아레나 버닝선 페이스" "구찌백 루이백 펜디백 샤넬백 벌킨백" "내 목에 icey"같은 여전한 머니스웩들이 보입니다.
사랑노래를 가장한 돈자랑 노래처럼 생각되기도 하죠. 클럽에서 잘생겼다며 거짓말을 듣는 상황마저요. 이 놓칠 수 없는 가사 속 스웩이 가사를 듣는 재미를 더해주기도 합니다.
이렇게 머니스웩인지 후회의 메아리인지 모를 가사가 지나가면서 듣는 사람이 혼란스러울 때쯤,
벌스 후반에 추억을 리얼하게 이미지화 해주는 소재가 배치되면서 감성을 삽시에 끼얹고 지나가주는데요.
첫 구성에는 창모의 "500 넘어 내 목걸이는 월에 못 벌어두 천이구 허나 내 머릿속 서리는 한 그림은 3평 월세 안 껴안은 둘"의 '3평 월세 안 껴안은 둘'로,
그리고 두번째 구성에서는 슈퍼비의 "우리 매일 가던 롯데리아 단품 말고 살 수 있어 세트 100개 근데 너가 없이 무슨 소용이야"의 '롯데리아 단품'으로요.
벌스 전반을 감성에 호소했으면 지루하게 흘렀을 가사였을텐데요. 벌스에서는 오데마 시계 그리고 매드홀릭 아레나 로 시작해서 감정의 구절 수가 늘어나며 배치되고요.
벌스 후의 훅의 감정과 연결시키듯이 벌스 마지막에 순정과 가난의 메타포를 툭 뱉어눕니다. 가사의 구조가 치밀한 듯 보이기도 하죠. 담백하게 느껴지고요.
이 3평 월세와 롯데리아 단품은 500만원짜리 목걸이나 벌킨백보다 많은 사람한테 다가가는 물질이기도 했겠죠.
더 보면 '매드홀릭 아레나'인 클럽의 공간에서 '3평 월세'의 공간으로 대비되기도 하고요. '샤넬백 벌킨백'이 '롯데리아 단품'과 가격으로 대비되기도 하...네요.
물론 거꾸로 생각하면, 경연을 위해서 표를 얻기위해서 '억'지로 짜낸 사랑노래라서 '억'.........?일지도 모릅니다ㅋㅋㅋ
+ f*ck에서 에프를 뺀 uck이라고 하네요
슈퍼비 억에서는 노래가 끝나며 "손에 억 싫어 두 손 원해"하는데요. 사랑노래로 다시 곡의 화자들은 억을 손에 잡을....까요?
-------------------------------------------
Kerryon Johnson Fantasy: Should You Start or Sit the Lions RB? | Heavy.com - Duration: 5:02.
Kerryon Johnson Fantasy: Should You Start or Sit the Lions RB? | Heavy.com
The Kerryon Johnson bandwagon is picking up steam and fantasy football players are jumping on board at a rapid rate.
We've seen the Detroit Lions running back burst onto the scene in recent weeks, excelling when given extended work.
He's played a big role in the team's back-to-back victories and should be busy on Sunday.
After Johnson's huge Week 7 performance in which he tallied season highs in rushing attempts (19) and yards (158), he now draws a matchup against the Seattle Seahawks at home.
The rookie out of Auburn has carved out a solid role and has plenty of upside, but there has been concern this season about Lions coach Matt Patricia holding back his workload.
So, let's look into Johnson's spot this week for fantasy football players and break down whether he's a start or sit against the Seahawks.
Key Stats and Kerryon Johnson's Fantasy Outlook.
I'll break down the matchup along with a few numbers which jump out about Johnson and the Lions.
All information on fantasy points and statistics for defense vs.
position are from ESPN.
Seattle Seahawks vs.
running backs in 2018: 129 attempts, 531 rushing yards, 33 receptions, 257 receiving yards, six total touchdowns (No.
15 fewest fantasy points per game) Johnson played his most offensive snaps in a single game of the season in Week 7 (59 percent), per Football Outsiders Johnson has averaged 5.8 yards per carry or better in each of the past five games and has at least 10 touches in each of those games He also has at least 12 carries in three of the last four games.
Johnson's workload is finally starting to get there, and it seems Patricia can no longer avoid giving the 21-year-old the touches he deserves.
Whether he was just bringing him along slowly or trying to preserve his snaps, the Lions back has officially turned a corner.
Should You Start or Sit Kerryon Johnson?.
While the matchup against the Seahawks is no walk in the park, it could certainly be worse.
I don't expect to see Johnson's workload or impressive play to slow down this week either.
On the season, Seattle has given up the No.
9 most rushing yards per game with 120.7.
The only way Johnson's fantasy outlook takes a hit this week is if the Lions fall behind early and are playing catch up most of the game, and I can't envision that happening.
This game should stay close and the rookie's upside is high once again.
I'd recommend starting him in all formats and leagues with 12 teams or more, and he's a fine option in 10-teamers depending on your roster.
READ NEXT: Keke Coutee Fantasy: Impact of Texans WR Will Fuller's Injury.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét