Confirmed Liverpool lineup vs. Leicester: Lovren, Matip and Can all start
Jurgen Klopp has made seven changes to his Liverpool starting lineup for Saturday's crucial Premier League clash away to Leicester City.
The Reds have endured a miserable run of form in all competitions, with a loss and a draw in the Premier League, a draw in the Champions League and defeat in the League Cup.
Their cup exit came at the hands of Craig Shakespeare's Foxes, who again provide the opposition as Liverpool make their sixth league outing of 2017/18.
Having shuffled his pack to include a host of fringe players and youngsters at the King Power Stadium on Tuesday night, Klopp has restored his heavy hitters for Saturday.
Simon Mignolet takes over from Danny Ward between the sticks, despite the Wales international's assured showing in midweek.
In defence, despite concerns over their fitness, Dejan Lovren and Joel Matip line up at centre-back, flanked by Joe Gomez and Alberto Moreno.
Jordan Henderson keeps his place in midfield, despite playing the full 90 minutes last time out, with the captain joined by Georginio Wijnaldum and Emre Can.
Having provided Roberto Firmino with a much-needed rest for the League Cup, the Brazilian returns to the forward line, alongside Mohamed Salah and Philippe Coutinho.
Leicester City: Schmeichel; Simpson, Morgan, Maguire, Chilwell; Mahrez, Ndidi, King, Albrighton; Vardy, Okazaki.
Substitutes: Hamer, Amartey, Fuchs, Iborra, Gray, Iheanacho, Slimani.
Liverpool: Mignolet; Gomez, Matip, Lovren, Moreno; Henderson, Wijnaldum, Can; Salah, Coutinho, Firmino.
Substitutes: Karius, Klavan, Alexander-Arnold, Milner, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Solanke, Sturridge.
For more infomation >> Confirmed Liverpool lineup vs. Leicester: Lovren, Matip and Can all start - Duration: 2:35.-------------------------------------------
Can Yuce - Koştum hekime - Duration: 1:20.
-------------------------------------------
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future - Duration: 5:12.
Hello, ladies and gents, welcome to Luscid!
Today we'll start with a simple thought experiment.
Imagine taking a time machine back to the year 1750—a time when electricity hasn't
been introduced yet, long-distance communication took months, and horses were the main transport.
When you get there, you meet a random fellow, bring him to 2017,
walk him around and watch his reaction.
It's hard to imagine what it would be like for him to see shiny capsules whizzing with
160 km/h, talk to people who had been on the other side of the ocean earlier that day,
and capture real-life images with the magical rectangles in our pockets.
Then imagine bringing out the heavy artillery like explaining the Internet, the GPS or the
Quantum field theory.
Our new friend would be so surprised and mind blown by the progress humanity has achieved
that he might actually die of shock.
But here's the interesting thing—let's assume our friend survives the future shock
and decides to try the same thing.
He'd take the time machine, go back the same distance, get someone from around the
year 1500, bring him to his time, and show him around.
And the 1500 guy would be surprised by a lot of things—but he wouldn't die because
while the 16th and 18th centuries were very different, they were much less different than
the 18th and the 21st.
If our new friend wants to accomplish the same result, he'd have to go much farther
back—maybe all the way back to about 12,000 BC, before the First Agricultural Revolution
gave rise to the first cities and to the concept of civilization.
If someone from a purely hunter-gatherer world saw the vast human empires of the 18th century
with their monumental churches, ocean-crossing ships
and the enormous amount of generated knowledge - he'd probably die.
Two years ago Tim Urban - the WaitButWhy blogger, explored this unusual sci-fi plotline to illustrate
one common mistake that many people make when contemplating the level of progress humanity
is going to achieve in the future – thinking of it in straight lines.
Let me show you what I mean.
If I ask you, to make an educated guess about what's going to happen in 30 years you'll
probably look back to the progress of the previous 3 decades as an indicator.
This would be the same mistake our 1750 guy made when he got someone from the 16th century
and expected to blow his mind as much as his own was blown going the same distance ahead.
In order to think about the future correctly, we need to imagine things moving at a much
faster rate than they're moving now.
This pattern—human progress moving quicker and quicker as time goes on—is what futurist
Ray Kurzweil calls the Law of Accelerating Returns.
This happens because more advanced societies have the know-how and the technology to progress
at a faster rate than less advanced societies.
Kurzweil actually suggests that the progress of the entire 20th century happened between
the years 2000 and 2014 and that another 20th century's worth of progress will happen
by 2021.
But what's really mind-bending is his prediction that till the end of the 21st century we will
achieve 1,000 times the progress of the 20th century.
If you're having trouble grasping this, it's not your fault.
Decades of research in cognitive psychology show that the human mind struggles to understand
nonlinear relationships.
And it's not hard to see why.
For the vast majority of human existence, it was safe to assume that the world in which
you were born would look pretty much the same as the one in which you are going to die.
Actually not much change occurred even between generations: we used pretty much the same
tools, our menu didn't change a lot, life was not so different as a whole.
As a result, we've developed an intuitive outlook of the future as moving in a straight line –
steadily and slowly.
But if we want our predictions about the future to be more accurate we need to think about it
exponentially.
Exponential thinking is still a relatively unknown concept.
It is not just about thinking big; it is about the steps from small to big.
Here's another way to think about it: Imagine you are walking down a road taking steps a
meter in length.
If you take 30 linear steps, you'd end up 30 meters away from where you've started.
But, setting anatomy aside, if someone asks you to take 30 exponential steps
(one, two, four, eight, sixteen meters, and so on),
where would you end up?
The answer is a billion meters away, a distance equal to twenty-six trips around the planet.
Pretty amazing, right?
Now, if you consider the implications of exponential growth in relation to the progress of humanity,
it creates a very different picture of the future; a picture that our intuition struggles
to understand.
Problems that may seem intractable now could become eminently solvable in the near future.
Soon, things which we could barely have imagined decades ago might be just around the corner.
So, yes, we should expect mind-blowing changes in the near future!
But the bigger question here is: are we ready for them?
-------------------------------------------
[HD][VOSTFR] G soul - Can't - Duration: 3:38.
-------------------------------------------
#VisitorVoices - You Can Rise Above - Duration: 1:41.
My name is Bridget Cabande and I am from Mansfield, Ohio. Would you allow your
loved ones to participate in a dangerous activity for a larger cause?
I remember just participating in a protest outside my school and I came back and my
co-workers, my older co-workers, they were so worried that I was out there blocking
streets off with my peers from college and I thought like wow I would be
worried as well if my little brother or my parents were out there, and my
cousins were out there as well, but I think what I have to remember is
that with faith, it's worth it. It's worth it because you're defining what's
dangerous. Yeah it is dangerous being out there blocking streets being around
people who hate what you're doing, not having much protection, but I think what
could be even more dangerous is living the rest of your life allowing yourself
to be put down allowing your race to be put down, not
having the faith that you can rise above being put down. That's dangerous because
that can eat up away at you inside and cause us to not be who we were called to be.
-------------------------------------------
YENİ CİVCİVİM - Can Your Pet - Duration: 3:44.
-------------------------------------------
Can Yüce İnstegram Şarkıları #1# - Duration: 11:40.
-------------------------------------------
How Osteopathic manipulative treatment can compliment your current treatment plans - Duration: 3:19.
-------------------------------------------
Street Food Vietnam - Ninh Kieu - Can Tho Night Market | Toon Tube - Duration: 14:24.
-------------------------------------------
Pastor Leslie Pinto - Faith Can Do Wonders - Duration: 3:43:51.
-------------------------------------------
LAPD Hopes Public Can Help Them Find Missing Teen - Duration: 0:25.
-------------------------------------------
10+ Times JB Proved Breathing Can Be Sexy AF - Duration: 4:39.
10+ Times JB Proved Breathing Can Be Sexy AF
GOT7s JB doesnt have to do much, even so much as breathe, and his whole existence itself is already beautiful.
Forehead Galore .
Sexy Side-Profile.
Absolutely Breathtaking.
This Is What Art Is, Perfectly Sculpted.
Slight Smile, Instant Kill.
-------------------------------------------
Can I leave my Budgies home alone? - Duration: 2:07.
Budgies Home Alone
If you don't replenish your budgie's food
and water supply for a day, he won't keel over and die.
Similarly, a budgie left in an empty house for 24 hours will survive.
Indeed, you would be very unlucky to meet any problems in 48 hours home alone time.
Leaving him for more than a day is still pushing it, though, and you shouldn't take the risk.
The main issues are food and water.
A single budgie or a pair might get by on dried food for 48 hours, but it will depend
on your cage set-up.
A seed hopper replenishes as the birds feed; but it might become blocked due to a damp
patch.
Water might become contaminated with droppings.
If you keep several birds in an aviary or large cage, do you actually know how much
they eat?
You will have been putting fresh food out every day, but won't necessarily know if
the bowls and feeding stations can last 48 hours if unreplenished.
There are other reasons why indoor birds should not be left alone.
For example, you might cover them at night, or at the very least they might rely on the
opening and drawing of curtains to define their day.
And a single budgie will pine for interaction after just a few hours, as budgies crave company.
-------------------------------------------
WHY U.S BOMBER FLEET CAN DESTROY NORTH KOREAN MILITARY IN A SINGLE DAY? - Duration: 8:55.
North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un said President Donald Trump will "pay dearly" for his address
to the United Nations General Assembly earlier this week.
In the statement, Kim also said North Korea is considering the strongest possible response
to what he called Trump's provocation.
Kim according to The Associated Press said, "I'd like to advise Trump to exercise prudence
in selecting words and to be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in
front of the world".
President Donald Trump, in his first speech to the United Nations, had slammed Kim Jong
Un using his new favorite nickname 'Rocket Man'.
Trump said, referring to the regime of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un:
"No nation on Earth has an interest in seeing this band of criminals arm itself with nuclear
weapons and missiles".
He added, "The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend
itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea."
The US Air force fleet as of 2017 has 3 strategic bombers B-52 Stratofortress, B1B Lancer and
B-2 Spirit "Stealth Bomber".
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes WHY US BOMBER FLEET CAN DESTROY NORTH KOREAN MILITARY
IN A SINGLE DAY?
Lets get started.
The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is American long-range, subsonic, jet-powered strategic
bomber.
The B-52 was designed and built by Boeing, which has continued to provide support and
upgrades.
The B-52 has been in active service with the USAF since 1955.
As of now, 58 are in active service with 18 in reserve.
Superior performance at high subsonic speeds and relatively low operating costs has kept
the B-52 in service despite the advent of more advanced aircraft.
With regular upgrades, it is expected to serve into the 2040s.
Over its sixty-year lifetime, the B-52's avionics, flight hardware, and weapons systems
have been upgraded.
In 2006, the fleet received a "mid-life" upgrade to its avionics, adding modern processors
and navigation systems.
In 2014, the Air Force gave the B 52 their first new communications system since the
1960s, including full-color LCDs to replace the old cathode ray tube screens.
On the weapons front, the airplanes are due to receive weapons-bay upgrades, enabling
them to hold more smart bombs, and radar enhancements, potentially including the Active Electronically
Scanned Array Systems technology.
The bomber is capable of carrying up to 70,000 pounds (32,000 kg) of weapons, and has a typical
combat range of more than 8,800 miles (14,080 km) without aerial refueling.
This combination of outstanding range and high payload capacity and ability to incorporate
modern weapons makes B 52 apt for strategic bombing missions.
The B1B Lancer is a supersonic variable-sweep wing, heavy bomber used by the United States
Air Force (USAF).
It is commonly called the "Bone".
Most airplane wing designs are tradeoffs.
Wings are set for low speed stability or high-speed performance, or some middle point.
But even with flap systems and leading edge slats, fixed wings are compromises.
A multi-role aircraft needs more flexibility.
Having variability in the wing configuration has huge advantages in making a single aircraft
adept at multiple missions.
U.S has 100 of these.
B1B has an excellent range of Range: 5,900 mi or 9,400 km.
It has a Service ceiling of 60,000 ft.
The bomber has many design elements, which makes it hard for the enemy radar to detect it.
B1B has 6 external hardpoints for 50,000 pounds (23,000 kg) of ordnance and 3 internal bomb
bays for 75,000 pounds (34,000 kg) of ordnance.
Hence it has a massive payload of 125,000 lb (56,700 kg) internal and external ordnance
combined.
This makes B1B deadly.
For example it can carry
84× Mk-82 Air inflatable retarder (AIR) general purpose (GP) bombs or
81× Mk-82 low drag general purpose (LDGP) bombs or
24× Mk-84 general-purpose bombs 24× Mk-65 naval mines
The B-2 Spirit was developed to take over the United States Air Force's (USAF) vital
penetration missions, able to travel deep into enemy territory to deploy their ordnance,
which could include nuclear weapons.
The B-2 is a flying wing aircraft, meaning it has no fuselage or tail.
The blending of low-observable technologies with high aerodynamic efficiency and large
payload gives the B-2 significant advantages over previous bombers.
Stealth capability provides greater freedom of action as the bomber can evade enemy air
defenses.
U.S has 21 of these.
The U.S. Air Force reports B2's range as approximately 6,900 miles or 11,000 km.
It has an excellent payload too.
B2 has 2 internal bays for ordnance and payload with maximum estimated limit of 50,000 lb
(23,000 kg).
It can carry 16 B61 or B83 nuclear bombs on Rotary Launcher Assembly.
The B61 is a variable yield, kiloton-range weapon.
Tactical versions can be set to 0.3, 1.5, 5, 10, 45, 60, 80, or 170 kiloton explosive
yield and the strategic version has a yield 340 kilotons.
The B83 thermonuclear weapon is a variable-yield gravity bomb.
It is the most powerful free-fall nuclear weapon in the United States arsenal with a
maximum yield of 1.2 megatons of TNT.
For comparison, the Fat Man atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki had a yield of 20 kilotons of TNT
North Korean air defense are good in numbers but not in quality.
The missile defense like SA-2 Guideline, SA-6 Gainful, SA-5 Gammon are all designed in 1960s
and have vintage technology by today's standards.
These systems also may not be in proper working order and the missile availability is expected
to be low.
The B-2 and B1B were designed specifically to evade such defenses, and the relatively
low tech B-52s can simply fire AGM-86 cruise missiles at North Korea from well beyond the
range of the country's air defenses.
North Korea has a fleet of different kinds of fighters, which even includes Chinese derivatives
of very old fighters like Mig 17 and Mig 19.
The MiG-29 is the Korean People's Army Air Force's (KPAF) most modern fighter and it
operates approximately 40 of these.
Though the Mig 29 is a proficient fighter but North Korea has been isolated for long
with very little access to spare parts and other maintenance infrastructure.
Also with no access to foreign air-to-air missiles, because of sanction and no in-house
designs; the Mig 29 is equipped with old weapons technology.
These will be easy prey for US fighter jet escorting the bombers.
With little challenge from air defenses and enemy fighter jets, these bombers can operate
with impunity and the massive destructive power is capable to bring down North Korean
military to its knees in a single day.
-------------------------------------------
GST RCM INPUT UTILIZATION MONTH, When ITC can be utilise ? - Duration: 3:46.
PLS LIKE & SHARE & SUBSCRIBE OUR CHANNEL
PLS LIKE & SHARE & SUBSCRIBE OUR CHANNEL
PLS LIKE & SHARE & SUBSCRIBE OUR CHANNEL
-------------------------------------------
The one annoying friend you can't argue with!! - Duration: 1:18.
Abey earth flat hai
earth gol hai
kaise gol hai, haan!!
C#*tiye bachpan mein science nahi padha kya?
abey tu abhi mera logic sun, mera logic sun
theek hai
earth flat hota, ummm
gol hota toh pani
aise niche nahi gir jata
flat hai
pani waisa hi rehta hai
samajh!!
aaeee!!
acha ek baat bata
sawal puchta hu main tereko
theek hai
ek aisa word bata
jo age se or piche se same ho
jaise?
jaise malayalam
ma-la-ya-lam
ma-la-ya-lam
are BULB huana!!
bulb kaise b@nc#od
bulb ka ulta karega
BLUB ho jayega
arey, ba-la-b
ba-la-b
B#anC#oD!!
-------------------------------------------
Lisa Can't Stand Watching BLACKPINK's Music Video For This Reason - Duration: 2:11.
Lisa Can't Stand Watching BLACKPINK's Music Video For This Reason
BLACKPINKs Lisa admitted she couldnt watch their music video for As if its Your Last for one reason.
In a recent radio program, BLACKPINK were asked how many times they had watched their own music video.
Jisoo revealed she watched it over 20 times to help fans raise the view count.
I think I watched it around 20 times.
I strongly want to help with raising the view count, so I tend to watch it more. — BLACKPINKs Jisoo.
Jennie said her mother always has the music video running in the background, so shes constantly watching it while home.
My mother turns the music video on at all times, so whenever Im at home, Im pretty much forced to watch it.
I think I watch it at least once a day every day. — BLACKPINKs Jennie.
Rosé revealed she watched it around 6 times, while Lisa said she couldnt really watch it because it was so embarrassing.
Image Source: Amino Apps.
In this music video, I just felt really awkward so I couldnt really watch it.
— BLACKPINKs Lisa.
How many times have you watched it?.
-------------------------------------------
Liza Manelli Proves She Can Still Sing | TMZ TV - Duration: 1:19.
>> LIZA MINNELLI.
WE WITH GOT HER AT CRAIG'S.
SHE'S AMAZING.
WE ASK HER ABOUT ALL OF THESE
RUMORS THAT APPARENTLY SHE CAN'T
SING ANYMORE, SHE LOST HER
VOICE.
SHE'S SITTING IN A CAR --
>> WE WANTED TO KNOW HOW YOUR
VOICE IS DOING PRETTY MUCH?
>> PERFECT.
>> IT'S GOOD?
YOU STILL HAVE THE TOPS?
>> OH, OF COURSE.
>> SO SHE ACTUALLY SINGS FOR US.
♪ DEO ♪♪
♪ DAYLIGHT COME AND WE WANT TO
GO HOME ♪♪
>> OK.
>> SO SHE LOST HER VOICE!
SHE'S UPSET.
>> GUYS, SHE'S THE BEST!
>> THAT'S WHAT LIZA MINNELLI
ALWAYS SOUNDED LIKE.
HARVEY: PLAY THAT AGAIN.
PLAY THAT AGAIN.
♪ DEO, DEO ♪♪
[LAUGHTER]
>> SEE, I LOVE IT.
SHE ALWAYS SOUNDS LIKE SHE'S
TAKING TWO PERCOCETS AND WASH IT
DOWN WITH A MARTINI.
LET'S GO.
[LAUGHTER]
♪ DAYLIGHT COME AND WE WANT TO
GO HOME ♪♪
-------------------------------------------
Planet x Nibiru update September 25th, 2017 is Very Close and Can Cause Catastrophic Disasters - Duration: 28:26.
-------------------------------------------
Nasa Warning September 24th, 2017! Nibiru Planet X Is Very Close, We Can not Help You, Please share - Duration: 28:39.
Thank you for watching videos Subscribe to channels - LIKE - SHARE to track channel
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét